הפשוטו של מקרא של ובשר בשדה טריפה לא תאכילו

I think it's Kadai to pick up a little bit where we left off yesterday and do a little bit of a part two. So in yesterday's d we saw a very big theor says which means this something called an what's that was the last month of that's pericus but we saw that learned another from this very same kazal said that from this we learn that if you have baser that has a and the basel leaves its at that point it's going to be user to eat from that boser again what are examples of that what example is even though the mission says but the bottom line is it's the game Another example like we saw on which we saw is really a brings inf and that is that as it relates to if you would have that would leave or that would leave or that would leave would be that at that point you wouldn't be allowed to eat the food that left its respective and not just that if somebody would eat from it, he would be of which the Raam says very clearly is the bottom line is two distinct at first glance completely disparit that are both learned out from the same number one number two this now the isra has learned out from the word. It's because the word thought was super and what if you found it in the what if you found it in the barn? What if you found it in your house? It would be the same. Why did say the word a second as if to say that's teaching me that's teaching me the this is something that is that emerges from school the truth is here's another this is said it says in theor and we learn from this is the love in the that a person is not allowed to eat when it says in the meaning not only are you not allowed to eat an you're also not to had to learn the according to is the According to both we always thought it was the from the if you take a look at Rashi and inus Rashi and both I'm going to read it's the we know we saw it in today's that is and doesn't just mean that you go and you take a live animal and you just bite into it. If an a of the animal is taken off of the animal itself and you go ahead and eat that, that's also if you stick from a live animal, you eat it, that's also it's the means the supposed to be on the animal. YOU FOUND YOU FOUND it sitting in the field and that's where learns from the as the word that's already in other words saying learns like that is a learned out from you think didn't know that of course and he knows is the but hell that there's another that's learned out from this boss. Again, that other lab is is it says and what is basada teaching me? It's teaching me that busar that was supposed to be on the you have this live animal and it should be part of the bus of the animal and now you found it lying around in the field that but it's that is that's what we know as from well both learning the same way that because he was bothered with the And that's how we came to to this truth is just looking at this I thought this doesn't look like but the bottom line is what is going to do he learns it to teach me a similar but something else not that's not what is coming to teach me out of But it's off the go that is not out from but rather it's out from but the bottom line is whether that is could be it's that but either way we have over here three that are learned out from the same because the regular is We mentioned that was that and as you would expect that we learned this of so there's three that are learned out from the three level fascinating thing the is that everybody knows additionally the is And additional to that these are three and they're all learned out from the same are over because this is going to segue into the next part of this. How do we learn that but didn't have to say so if it said and really it left it that's what means it was and that's what this means over here stating that if you take a look at the Rama inuro paric says the if somebody chops off a piece of from a live animals, that buser is a tra and if somebody goes and somebody eats a from it, you're going to get malus for being over because this bus came from the Rams. But the Ram says one thing that didn't say and then says but the Rambam holds that if somebody eats he's actually eating that means the in the world of the Rambam the in the world of the Rambam is Bam that is what it is it's the is the seem to learn and seeing to learn that the gather of how learned his and this is not that is of the ra no the says when someone eats eating and if that's the case it's that the ra had a definition of tra that doesn't uh I think at first glance but murish reconcile so well what we thought we know what a trafer is we learn parake with traers we saw all the pictures so we have an idea of what a a trafer looks like SAYING AT FIRST GLANCE what is SAYING just like is not but the ra saying no that is he says it twiceer So the Ram is referring to it as if to say it's one shem if it's one of the if it's at first glance what is you have to do it's it's very very he says I'm going to tell you what I think I'm going to tell you what I I think in this Rama is the Rama must have learned that the T of is when you have a a live animal and you removed a little bit of Basa from that live animal that is what's referred to as you saw a lying around on the ground. If you go ahead and you're a little bit of that that's sitting there you eat it that's what the definition of ta is tra is like says that is the t of what a tra is but it doesn't matter if that buser was pish because you went ahead and you were pirish or if it was because came and he was tired and that's what caused it to be pirishak at the end of the day if there's buser lying on the side of the or lying in the field that was that's what a tra is and the says and really says is the from the live animal if the happened an animal but here's the point said [snorts] there are certain times where if something was pish from an animal meaning something happened to an animal where We say that the existing animal is not going to be able to live anymore. When we see that then the way we deare the pisha is not just I have a and something was pirish the way I see it up over here is is that the two when each other and it's not only the you remove that we look at as being the traa but the remaining animal is also deemed as being a traif However, but if the entire became [snorts] so then the way we look at it is as if the came and he chopped the animal into two parts. And it comes out is literally the tra in other words the t of a tra is when you have that was it was from a live animal that you're not and I don't care if a person did it or if an animal did it call it call it TRA WHATEVER YOU WANT THAT IS WHAT traa is. There are times if you go ahead and you do that, what's left is also going to be considered as if it was ripped apart. Now the way it was ripped apart was you took A from B. But when you took A from B, you didn't just tear A from B, you tore B FROM A AS WELL. It's from because P was holding on to the left ear. You tore the left ear away from the right ear and really you tore the right ear from the left ear. I don't care what side of the animal what a it was that the z physically got his teeth and put his clenches into at the end of the day you ended up tearing it apart. So really just like the that was torn apart is tra the that's remaining is also considered a tra and that's what the general idea of trai and and took this and expanded it a little bit that just like if you take an animal you chop it into two if it's a that's also going to be included and if there's a hole in the in the etc etc etc but the bottom line is from the fact that the calls it's to me that the of That was the way you visualize your classic. That's usually the way you visualize the of and the point of the traus is is that when what was separated is such that it made such a profound difference on the live animal. Then I look at the live animal is also being torn apart. they were torn from each other and just like this piece I wouldn't be able to eat even if a person did it would be that part also not because it's viewed as [snorts] viewed as again it's all one shem it's all going to be one thing so really the t of tra this is the tricky part the type the t of tra is not an animal that has some wound that's not going to be able to tra is is when you tore apart a piece of an animal that's why fits right into into the said what was the mar to the raom to learn this way first glance it sounds a little bit like Rashi must have learned it a little bit more right what was the what was the to learn that is not just included in the of but rather he says you want to know where I think got it from he got it from if you Take a look at [laughter] what does mean that was torn from a live is the ultimate you know what about doesn't say A WORD ABOUT DOESN'T SAY A WORD ABOUT ANYTHING HE SAID WHICH IN OF ITSELF IS a he doesn't make sense that he is because really is and is one and the same thing but alopon saw in that we're not just from the extra word of it is that is what the T is and being that that's what the T is that's why that's why said must be that isn't just from the but really is that we just mentioned is on really talks about this a little bit in the beginning of a piece and over there he says that he found that his infe and then he goes hand. He says something beautiful. He says, "I believe that the issue with the says, "What do you do with the regarding the either give it to the shop or sell it to the and Rash already asks the why Is it that the you give to the and the you give to the in fact says that really the and if you want to go ahead and you want to give the tra to the letter give it so why does it says but the bottom line is is that was BOTHERED WITH THIS WHY by the does it say like and why is it that when it comes to the over there The Tyra says, "What do you do with it? You give it to the guy I WAS BOTHERED WITH THIS." HE COULD UNDERSTAND. Why here? And why there do you give it to the guy? You know what the must be? Because you know what this is saying? What this is is saying is not just a parakeet. It's saying is one of the and being that it's he can't give it to the guy. That's why it had to be was bothered with this. This is what was driving. What was driving him is is that why is it that when it comes to the trade yeah when it comes to the you go ahead and you give it to the guy must be it's over here it's being that it's over here it's going to be different I saw in the from this beautiful on this raid says right this is the ramson we have from on paracius and chamoy brand new maduras that the mia is yidi But either way, he says as follows. in parenthesis. It belongs to the group of But there are other extrapolated from this. Why we mention that's usually where it happened? There's another gave for the mitzvah and then concludes. I don't know why the said this now in his over here brings a little bit of a tuml like what he meant what was bothering but he comes out and I think it's posit that what was bothering is there's three there's three that we learn from this AND I DON'T KNOW. Why did the feel that in the you know what it's referring to not the OTHER TWO concludes with a he says I'm not sure why this is the but I think the terret is the that's the says why do you have to go ahead and give it to the make a profit off of it maybe give it to THE GUY THE SAYS BY THE SO WHAT DO you do the is the saw that the posit must be that we're dealing with something that even a must that's why the who's the most shot in this how is he was with regards to this office could be the terret to That's the either way. Three tremendous that I learned out from this L.