0:00 / 0:00
הם טוענים שה' החליף את עם ישראל - הרב סינגר משיב אש!
378 views
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
So go right ahead.
>> No worries. Okay. So yeah, my brother's
a trinitarian and he sincerely believes
that Christian theology is not
replacement theology. But when you read
it at face value, it seems that it is.
So how can I clearly show him from the
Tanakh that the New Testament itself
that Christian theology replaces
Israel's covenantal role with faith in
Jesus? How do you know that Israel
cannot be replaced and never be
replaced? So, it's very easy because
Tanakh says that the nation of Israel is
eternal. So said the Lord who created
the sun to illuminate the day, the moon,
the stars, the night. If these laws
shall pass before me, so will I cast off
the children of Israel as being a nation
before me. Moreover, you see explicitly,
there's so many answers to this
question, but you see explicitly in the
end time prophecy, and I want to be very
careful to select texts that everyone
knows is an end time text
like everyone everyone's on board. Let's
go to I'm just picking one because the
passage is all over that Israel cannot
be departed that Hashem is with the
children of Israel and in fact in the
in the chapter of the blessings and the
curse Leviticus chapter 26 it says there
that anger Jews and they sinned but I
will have mercy on them because of the
promise I made to Abraham and Isaac and
Jacob they will return I'll have mercy
on them. So it can't be means all these
texts that talk about the eternal
covenant with the ch physical children
of Israel acknowledges the sins of the
past. This is very transparent. So I
want to there are many ways to address
your question but I'd like to address it
in a way that's a little different and I
think it's novel and I think in a very
transparent way
completely blows up replacement
theology. And what I'm going to present
to you is a a passage which talks about
the restoration of the Jewish people to
the land. It's end times. Everyone has
to agree because everyone doesn't agree
then it doesn't make sense, right? And
the text itself says that this is the
very same people that sinned. Why?
Because of their faithlessness and
therefore they were ex off in the land
but at the end of days they're going to
be restored. Do you follow? So we're not
going to like normally a person who has
some even superficial knowledge of
Tanakh, we just go randomly into
hundreds and hundreds of passages and my
covenant will never pass away. Never.
Never. I could do that. But I want to do
is I want to dance with you in this one
type of passage which is all over Tanh
like Amos ends as an example. It was a
very harsh book. I mean, almost begins
with tremendous criticism of the
children of Israel.
But at the end, he says ultimately
you're going to be replanted and never
be uprooted. See the last two vers. I'm
not going to tell you the verse number
because I don't want to overload you.
The last two verses 94 and 15. But what
I would like to do is enter approach
this question at a certain uh trajectory
of attack. That's so critical that's
immutable. It can't be upended. And I
want you to join me in Ezekiel chapter
39. And the reason this is really very
germanine to us is this is end time
prophecy about the time we're in right
now. It's the war of gumog.
So Ezekiel 39,
everybody knows this is messianic. This
is the grand war between Israel and
Persia. The end days it's there. Okay.
Why is there a war that immediately
precedes the coming of Messiah? When I
say precedes, I mean, it's part of the
messianic order of events, but this is
the the last event that triggers the
coming Messiah. So, we're actually told
explicitly, if you would, if you can,
please open up Ezekiel 39
and verse 21. And I I read it in context
but I assure you it is very very much in
context. It prior to that explicitly we
are shown with a very powerful im not
even imagery of the utter destruction of
the enemies of Israel. Okay complete hor
they're all destroyed. 39:21 I really
want you to read it inside.
and the wisest to display my glory among
the nations that all the nations will
see the punishment I afflict and lay
upon them. Verse 22 is very interesting
because sometimes you have Jews go what
happens now like what am I supposed to
do? Verse 22, that day forward Israel
will know that I am Lord. Now look at 23
and this is where you start dancing. So
right now is the time you stand up. This
is where the the dancing begins. Verse
23. And the nation will know that the
people of Israel went into exile for
their sin. What did they do wrong? It
continues, "Because they were unfaithful
to me." What did I do? I hid my face
from them and handed them over to their
enemies and they fell by the sword.
Could this be Christian? The church
can't be. It has to be Israel. Literally
the text is not whitewashing anything
here. It's it's painful to read this as
a Jew. And I dealt with them according
to their uncleanness and according to
their offenses and I hid my face from
them. This can't be the church to the
church did the right thing. They're the
believers. Verse 25 that I'll restore
the fortunes of Jacob. Could be the
church. It can't be the church. And have
compassion on the people of Israel. My
zealous holy name. then their sin and so
on will be put aside will be shamedly.
Now you have to tie this to Isaiah 40
verse 1 and 2 comfort ye comfort ye my
people declares the Lord why should they
be come? So it tells us there because
Jerusalem has taken double for the
Lord's iniquity. The Jews are punished.
And then it says when I had brought them
back from the nations that have gathered
from the countries of their enemies, I
will prove holy in them in the sight of
all the nations openly. This can't be
the church.
This is all you have to do. You follow?
Because if you the There are many ways
to address this but this is a
an approach which is it can't be
anything else because the text is saying
that the Jews are restored that the Jews
Israel defeats his enemies that's the
context and it's the physical
descendants of Abraham Isaac and Jacob
who went into a very long exile because
of what? because they're unbelief. No
one is whitewashing anything here.
Then and you want to know why this all
happens? It's the same as the end of
Ezekiel 38 of chapter 4. Then they will
know that I am the Lord God. And
although I said them look at the look at
this and start kissing Hashem. I look if
you don't do truva at this moment then I
don't know then I don't I can't think of
anything that will bring that about
literally because I sent them into exile
and then I assembled them into their own
land and they will not be remaining
among mani they will not be found in the
five towns they will not be found in Los
Angeles they're not going to be found in
London they're not going to be found in
man trust. I hope you're all listening
to this. They're not going to be found
there. Unbelievable. And we have the ina
exalt. Therefore, I would say
that this cluster
of passages just can't be it cannot be
speaking about the church. And again,
there are
texts everywhere that Israel cannot be
destroyed. Everywhere. It's an eternal
covenant. It's not that the Jews will
not go into exile because they do go
into exile. In fact, we're told in Hosea
that they go for a long long time and
they lose the temple, they lose
everything. It was all there. The
prophets are very harsh towards the
Jews.
No one. But at the end, look at 3:5.
They'll return to God and David, which
is Messiah. So that I would say is is
just the most
simple, transparent. It there's no
possible response to this by someone who
believes in replacement theology or
called covenant theology or
supersessionism. They all mean the same
thing which is what the Catholic Church
believes, what the Orthodox believe
church believes. And the Protestant
church is divided.
That's it. Um this was the view of the
church fathers. It was the view of the
reformers. But there are many Christians
today that utterly reject this. They're
called dispensationalists. It's not
really the proper term for them. But
they they're very often called
dispensationalist. It's an inaccurate
term, but it became conventional. Um
that's fine. There are incidentally one
thing is there are many Catholics,
many Catholics who believe that God has
restored the Jews and reject this
personally. Not the view of the church.
Although some popes have made statements
like Benedict that came close to it,
they were trying to be ecumenical. But
there are Catholics that believe that
the Jews, physical Jews are restored
according to God's providence. And what
that woman, Catholic woman, screamed
like a lunatic that Catholics can't be
Zionist. She's a complete idiot. And
I'll say it right now, a total
There are many, many Catholics that
believe that God through his providence
has restored the Jewish people, physical
Jewish people land. That is not the
consensus. But there are plenty of
people like that and the Orthodox is
less so because they never had a second
Vatican council. I rest my case. If you
enjoyed this program,
please like and subscribe.
[music]
[singing]
>> [music]
[music]
[singing]