החקירה של הגרי״ז בענין הפסול נעבד לגבוה

Going back to Daf Nun Daled Amud Aleph the Gemara that discussed the halachos of Nevad bonus. So, taking it from the top. Four lines from the top of Nun Daled Amud Aleph the Gemara brought a brice. Ton, Nevad sh'lo oser sh'l chaveiro moter. If somebody's oved his own beheima, it becomes a Nevad, it becomes posul l'korban. That's the judgment in a baki in a Nevad put on the mizbeach. But, if somebody would be oved somebody else's beheima, sh'l chaveiro, it would be moter. Poshet, because it's always that way. If somebody would worship somebody else's thing, it wouldn't become avodah zarah. In other words, it doesn't shail a shailah. When it comes to Nevad, you have the same halacha. But, Reb Zeira had a kasha very many. Eizehu Nevad? Kol sh' oved oiso bein b'shogeig, bein b'meizid, bein b'ones, bein b'ratzon. And the Gemara thought that what does it mean, bein b'ones? It means k'gon anas b'eima sh'l chaveiro. Reb Shach would say and if that's the case, it's m'forash in this brice that if somebody is oved somebody else's beheima, it does become a Nevad. It's a flat-out stira. And the Gemara gave two terutzim. The first terutz was Amar Rebbi Bar Chama. Rebbi Bar Chama said, "Lo." The second brice is talking about something completely different. It's talking about when somebody was forced into being oved. And being that he was forced into being oved, so he al korbono was oved his own animal. And being that he was oved his own animal, it has nothing to do with the first brice. First brice is talking about where you oved somebody else's animal. The second brice is talking about WHERE YOU OVED YOUR FIRST ANIMAL, your own animal. I, why is it called ones? Cuz you were forced into it. Very good Gemara. Maseches Avodah Zarah 22a. If you're forced into it, then you're an ones rachmana patrei. D'chazal and I realize that Reb Zeira said that it's true, but there are times that it's oser even b'ones to be oved avodah zarah. Rebbi said before Reb Zeira and Reb Shimon said he could have gone according to the halacha that avodah zarah is always your avodah zarah, but the bottom line is being that it's sometimes oser or maybe always oser. So, for that reason, you don't have the heft of a ones rachmana patrei. That's why it would make sense that really it should be oser. But, the point is the two brice are talking about two completely different things. The second terutz the Gemara gave was Chizkiya. That really both brice are talking about the same thing. They're both talking about when somebody was oved somebody else's avodah zarah. One brice says moter, one brice says oser. Yeah, one's talking about where you did a maiseh, the other one's talking about where you didn't do a maiseh. Other amora'im also said this chelek. What's the makor to it? We know from Achas and Chizkiya, right? That's pretty much the the shortest recap of Daf Nun Daled Amud Aleph. Rebbi Bar Chama's terutz to the stira was that the two brice are talking about two completely different things. The brice that says, "Sh'lo oser sh'l chaveiro moter" is very clear. It's talking about where somebody would worship his friend's animal. The halacha is the animal would be moter, not even oser l'korban. The says, "Eizehu Nevad? Bein b'shogeig, bein b'meizid, bein b'ones, bein b'ratzon" is talking about where he worshipped his own animal. But, on tzu oved k'chafen and he was forced into it, which is why it's called an ones. BUT, IT'S HIS OWN ANIMAL. SO, it has nothing to do with worshipping somebody else's animal. When Rebbi Bar Chama said his terutz, Maseches Avodah Zarah, Reb Zeira stormed in. Right, Maseches Avodah with a kiefus. And he said, "What's going on over here? It's written in the Torah, "V'lo sa'aseh davar." Ones rachmana patrei. If that's the case, how could it be that if somebody is oved avodah zarah b'ones, it's now going to be a Nevad? You're now going to be able to take this animal and put it on THE MIZBEACH. ONES RACHMANA PATREI. SO, IF ONES RACHMANA PATREI, THERE'S NO WAY THAT THIS animal should be This animal should now be a Nevad. It should be oser l'korban. At first glance, Reb Zeira's Maseches Avodah is mamash mechuseres havana l'gamrei. Says, "Why? What does it mean, eizehu Nevad?" We're trying to determine what's an animal that's considered to have been worshipped, as a result of which it would now be oser to be brought as a korban. Says the brice, "Kol sh' oved oiso bein b'shogeig, bein b'meizid, bein b'ones, bein b'ratzon." What does ones mean? Say Rebbi Bar Chama. A person at gunpoint went ahead and he worshipped an avodah zarah. Very good, Reb Zeira. IF YOU DID IT AT GUNPOINT, YOU'RE POTER. What does it mean you're poter? It means you're not going to be punished. On the other hand, if someone's oved avodah zarah, he's chayev skila, he's chayev kares. This guy's going to be poter. Who said he's going to be chayev? The he's going to be chayev? What did the brice say? The brice said, "Eizehu Nevad?" All the brice said is that you're going to take this animal, you're going to want to bring it as a korban, you're not allowed to do it. It's going to be off-limits. Who said anything about this person being chayev or poter? Maseches Avodah Zarah, ones rachmana patrei. D'chazal and I realize that Reb Shimon WHAT DOES IT HAVE TO DO WITH "V'LO SA'ASEH DAVAR"? "V'lo sa'aseh davar" says that if you do something b'ones, you're poter. If the brice would have said, "What's an example of an oved avodah zarah that's chayev skila, he's chayev kares?" And you would tell me, "Bein b'ones." And Rebbi Bar Chama would have said, "YOU WERE FORCED BY A DAY'AN AKUM to go ahead and do it." Oh, you'd have a good kasha. Maseches Avodah Zarah, ones rachmana patrei. What did the BRICE SAY? THE BRICE SAID, "This animal is a heft of a Nevad." You want to take this animal, you want to bring it as a korban? You're not allowed to bring it as a korban. Who said that that has any What should What does it do with "V'lo sa'aseh davar"? You're right, the guy was an ones. And you're right, he's going to be poter. BUT, HE WAS OVED IT. AND DON'T LOOK AT THE BRICE. The brice is saying that if you oved it b'ones, even though "V'lo sa'aseh davar" this person m'tzad hagavra will not have any invoice that he needs to pay, but at the same time he was oved avodah zarah. And if someone's oved avodah zarah, the avodah zarah becomes a Nevad. And a Nevad halacha is you're not allowed to put on the mizbeach. K'tzad pel? What's the terutz? The terutz is the Cham D'Shlomo. And you know who says the terutz is the Cham D'Shlomo? The Cham D'Shlomo. Which Cham D'Shlomo? Of Kesubos Daf Gimel Amud Aleph of the Sugya of Yeish Ones B'Getin. In Ones B'Getin, which Reb Chanan brings b'shem Reb Chaim Brisker, that all the Gedolei Ha'Achronim run with in their Yeshiva Shiurim when it comes to ones. And that is not merely you learn. What does it mean, ones rachmana patrei? That if a person does something b'ones, the halacha is he's not going to be responsible, he's not going to have to pay for what it is that he did. But, it's m'vorer in the Sugya that ones rachmana patrei means more than that. That when a person does something b'ones, it's not even considered that he did what he did. Now, there's different shitos how you say it, but the easiest nosach is that a maiseh b'ones is felt in the ikar maiseh. It's not considered a maiseh either. Right, what's derived from Yeish Ones B'Getin? Cuz it's m'vorer m'vorer over there that if somebody gives a get al t'nai and he was m'kayem the t'nai b'ones, it's not considered a kiyum t'nai. Because "V'lo sa'aseh davar" is a grashin Kesubos Daf Gimel Amud Aleph. "V'lo sa'aseh davar" means that if you're m'kayem the t'nai b'ones, you aren't m'kayem the t'nai. It means you don't get malkus if you ate CHAZER B'ONES. WHAT DOES IT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING? The terutz is because "V'lo sa'aseh davar" Yeah, what it means is don't punish the n'arah. But, the oimek is because HER MAISEH IS NOT CONSIDERED SHE DIDN'T DO A MAISEH of giluy arayos b'chalal. That's the oimek of how every ones works. Says the Cham D'Shlomo, this Gemara with Avodah Zarah Daf Nun Daled Amud Aleph is a rayan of flaw to my side. And that is that ones rachmana patrei doesn't just mean I did the maiseh, but I'm not going to be punished. As if to say there's meizid, there's shogeig, there's ones, there's m'saseik. No. It means much more than that. A maiseh b'ones is not considered a maiseh b'chalal. And if it's not considered a maiseh, that's the oimek of the Gemara. The Gemara is saying that "Eizehu Nevad? Kol sh' oved oiso bein b'shogeig, bein b'meizid, bein b'ones, bein b'ratzon." Amar Rebbi Bar Chama, what does it mean b'ones? K'gon tzu akum. Maseches Avodah Zarah. WHAT? IF AN AKUM FORCED HIM TO DO IT, IT'S NOT A MAISEH OF AVODAH ZARAH. IF IT'S NOT A MAISEH of avodah zarah, of course it's not going to make him into a Nevad. And if that's the case, how could you say it's a Nevad? Rebbi, what was the kasha? Very nice, "V'lo sa'aseh davar." But, what does it have to do with the cheftza? There was a maiseh OF AVODAH ZARAH OVED AT THE PLACE. And as a result, the animal now is a Nevad. The terutz is "V'lo sa'aseh davar" means it wasn't a maiseh. And if it wasn't a maiseh, so you don't have a cheftza of avodah zarah. If that's the case, you don't have a Nevad. It shouldn't be a problem. This is the poshet tzu shteil. And again, it's the Cham D'Shlomo himself that makes this tzu shteil. He doesn't just make the tzu shteil. This is really one of the big building blocks on which he bases his famous chidush. But, the truth is it's not poshet at all. It's not poshet at all. And the reason it's not poshet at all is because look at the hemshech of the Gemara. Maseches Avodah Zarah, ones rachmana patrei. D'chazal and I realize that "V'lo sa'aseh So, who came to the defense of Rebbi Bar Chama? Rava did. And what did Rava say? Rava said, "Don't shteil tzu "V'lo sa'aseh davar." Cuz we're dealing with avodah zarah. And being that we're dealing with avodah zarah, avodah zarah is different. Avodah zarah is different cuz avodah zarah halacha is your avodah zarah. And even if you hold it's not your avodah zarah, let's go with Reb Shimon. That's the way we learn the Gemara. Reb Shimon says this is not your avodah zarah. But, Reb Shimon says however it's your avodah zarah. So, Reb Shimon for sure it should be a problem." And the world was fine with what Rava said. L'chora, what's What's Rava's terutz? What's Rava's terutz? Rava's saying, "If someone puts a gun to your head, the Reb Shimon, and says, 'Be oved avodah zarah.' Or the halacha of Reb Shimon says, 'Be oved avodah zarah.' Don't do it. Don't do it. It's oser to do it. Right? Even though it says "V'chayevan." But, over here it's going to be different. Over here it's going to be oser." Beseder, it's oser. But, at the end of the day, when you do it, you weren't supposed to. But, if and when you did it b'ones, it's still "V'lo sa'aseh davar." Every k'naitch of the lomdus of the Cham D'Shlomo and Reb Chaim and Reb Chanan is going to be in play. Cuz at the end of the day, you did it b'ones. So, l'chora, we understand Maseches Avodah Zarah. It's the Cham D'Shlomo. By the way, it's in Orach Chaim Siman Mem Tes. That's what the Cham D'Shlomo is. So, we understand the Maseches Avodah Zarah. But, what's Rava's terutz? And for Rava, that being that Reb Shimon, it's oser. Who cares that Reb Shimon it's oser? At the end of the day, you still did it b'ones. And if you still did it b'ones, then l'chora then l'chora there's still a problem. Emes is, if you look at the Cham D'Shlomo inside, the moves just a little bit. Says, "What's Rava's terutz?" He works with Rava I'm sure. But, the Brisker Rav And this Brisker Rav is in Sefer, it's in Hilchos Avodah Zarah. He also asks this kasha. He doesn't quote Cham D'Shlomo, but he also asks this kasha. And he suggests the Musar Rishon, Maseches Avodah Zarah. It's based on this lomdus. The being that it was done by so Kayla said kind of my sir. But the problem is the follow up. If that's the case, what's Rava saying? What's Rava saying? Rava saying THAT BUT IT'S ALSO WHO CARES that it's also. Who cares that it's also? But if it's done, it's done by and if it's done by so then felt in the my server is all so felt in the my server is all that would be reason it shouldn't be a never. In other words, the this tomorrow over here on that one of even after knowing the slomo is still a dying over all the same. So the screw up said it was a but just to be but really the whole is going to come together a little bit and that is the Rambam in Hilchos is the mistake. This is in period of so [snorts] the Rambam asks in the that was discussed very much in today's staff regarding if someone goes and he worships his friend's animal. Does it become a never? Does it not become a never? Says the Rambam a never been a been show of a bear. Whether the person worships with his own animal or his friend's animal. Been in this rotten been rotten been rotten been rotten. Been with me dish been after dish I raise a sir. Rambam says if someone's over his friend's animal, let's focus on that part. I raise a right and never been show of a been show of a bear but in your nano the Rambam's psychological is that if somebody would go and he would worship his friend's animal, the animal would be a master. Talk to over the master of and over the cool. Show of a bear over the show of a bear over the master. The man a bigger than the Rambam with it. And that is it's true there's a concept of making your friend's animal into a never but it's only if you did a master. So the Rambam needs to be master right obviously clean out he needs to be master on the Rambam and that is that the Rambam says that if someone's over the image of a bear it's going to be ALSO THE RAMBAM FORGOT THE MOST basic master. The master of a bear over the show of a bear over the master. Now we did the Rambam make this was it the second of the everything over right which is the whole thing over. The price said that if someone's over the image of a bear over the it's motor. There was a stereo there's another price that seems to say this also. There were two one is that something completely different when I saw over. The other I came to was that price WE DID A MASTER. ACCORDING TO THE first of the tomorrow you're always off the hook if you're over your friend's behavior. You're not the whole thing over but the animal's never going to be a never. According to the second came to there's a sad where never by the show of a bear is going to be a problem but even that it's only also a master. Time is the right what's going on with this Rambam. A never been show of a been show of a bear also without came to over the show of a bear over the master. What do you mean without came to over the show of a bear over the master there's no in the world that it should be also. According to the first in the over always motor. It's according TO HERE'S THAT'S WE HAD IT that it's going to be also but even that it's over the show of a bear over the master. Right over it from over the we brought from it from the with HIS SKILL. BUT IT'S OVER THE SHOW OF A BEAR OVER the master. At first glance a very very cash. If you look at the Mishnah the Mishnah says you have to say that the Rambam learned our the bottom part of it a little bit differently than the way we learned it I saw. But says the that I hold that there's a show of a bear over the car. To this Rambam and this is in the the is in period of the show of a bear over the car. The show of a bear says it's false. A never as it relates to a never is Tony there were those that taught been show of a been show of a bear over the that it doesn't matter if the person worshiped his own animal or if he worshiped his friend's animal either way it's going to be also. This Tony Tony and there were those that taught show of a show of a bear over the that if it was your own animal it's going to be also but if yes your friend's animal it's going to be motor. I haven't bought me master these two they wanted to say like this man the been show of a also. The man that held that been show of a also over the it's your man over the what is over the whole thing if you're holding there in the seventh period of the show of a bear over the I looked it up but if you're holding there that over the whole thing over that I look is over over the show of a bear over the show of a bear I mean that a person could be over the show of a bear over the show of a bear so therefore been show of a been show of a bear is going to be also. Man over the show of a over the show of a bear over the the one that holds that never does motor when it's over the it's over the show of a over the show of a bear who holds in over the show of a over the show of a bear if in over the show of a over the show of a bear when it comes to never you're going to be motor. Right so far so good. Over the show of a over the show of a bear over the show of a over the show of a bear over the show of a over the show of a bear I hold that the man over the holds that show of a show of a bear is also could be going according to the even according to the man over the in over the show of a over the show of a bear. If in over the show of a over the show of a bear how could you make your friend's animal into a never? Come over the come on so said over the show of a over the show of a bear just like we said over here that over the show of a over the show of a bear over the whole concept of a never is a the whole concept of a never is a because a never does not also over the yet it's also right that's the a never over the so too over the show of a over the show of a bear as it relates to something that's not yours over the show of a over the show of a bear even though it's not also over the a never over the it's going to be also over the So said over the show of a over the show of a bear I hold you could hold that in over the show of a over the show of a bear but there's still a of never over the when it comes to because the whole never every never every behavior is not also over the but it's also over the so you see when it comes to so all of a sudden the the is different. Behavior over the motor over the over over the over the over the show of a over the show of a bear also over the motor over the over over the show of a over the show of a bear could be is going to be also. So too although behavior is motor over the motor over the also means in over the show of a over the show of a bear but at the same time when it comes to maybe over there it's going to be different. Says first things first over the show of a over the show of a bear these over here is the Rambam's it's true when you learn over the over the and then you want to look up the Rambam so you're going to say what's going on over here. The is being master over the show of a over the show OF A BEAR HAS NO IN THE WORLD. THE RAMBAM'S A doesn't do with any permutation in the over the show of a over the show of a bear is Tony also no over the show of a over the show of a bear in fact the addresses why would there be a problem because of in over the show of a over the show of a bear but that's even the sad why you would need a master all trying to address in over the show of a over the show of a bear over the show of A OVER THE SHOW OF a bear WHEN IT COMES TO WHY SHOULD THERE BE A problem with in over the show of a over the show of a bear just like when it comes to over the show of a over the show of a bear ordinarily motor suddenly becomes also so too something that's not yours in over the show of a over the although ordinarily it's motor and over the in over the show of a over the show of a bear but when it comes to over there it's going to be also. This is the to the Rambam the way the explained it. The main Rambam over the been over the over the over The show of a over the show of a bear over the said over the over over the over the over made the same over the show of a over the show of a bear over the second period over the over the man over the over the over the said over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over The show of a over the show of a bear a show of a bear. Just like over the over that somebody worships is motor over the but it's also over the over So too when it comes to somebody else's behavior. It's motor over the in over the show of a over the show of a bear but when it comes to over the over there it's going to be also. Said over the over the over the over the in over the over the over the over the this over the doesn't become also over the that's the over the the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the over the OVER THE OVER THE OVER THE BUT IT'S REGARDING that we counter with the over the over the over the over the over the over that there's something called never when it comes to over the over the OVER THE OVER THE BUT WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH OVER THE OVER THE THAT'S A OVER THE OVER THE OVER THE OVER THE OVER THE OVER THE OVER THE OVER THE OVER THE OVER THE OVER THE OVER THE it's a pillar over the over the over the is the no question in the world that there's no problem with in over the when it comes to and as a result there's no reason it should be between your behavior your friend's behavior even if you didn't do a master not like the not like the over the over the But at the end of the day the came to it out. He made a the just like just like when it comes to a it's motor over the but it's also over the so too when it comes to in over the it's motor over the it's going to be also over the over the the fact that over the motor over the IS A IT'S A RIGHT IT'S OUT FROM OVER THE over the right there's a that over the OVER THE IT'S A NO OVER THE OVER THE THAT SAYS THAT THERE'S no over the OVER THE THERE'S THAT SAYS THERE IS OVER THE IS CONSIDERED NEVER OVER THE BUT IN over the is not BECAUSE IT'S A IT'S NOT YOURS SO IF IT'S NOT YOURS IT'S NOT YOURS OVER THE OVER THE SO WHEN IT COMES TO NOW THIS ONE IF YOU HAD A YOU HAVE A YOU HAVE A ONE TIME MASTER different okay you have a for master but what was the for master you had a to say no problem you had him A CAR FOR THAT. BUT OVER HERE THERE'S NO MCCARTHY. YOU SHALL BE JUST SAYING LIKE A SWORD THAT JUST like the dinner vet. I don't care about it when it comes to the buyer. Meaning the tour of doesn't apply to the buyer. SO DO IT. THE DOESN'T apply when it comes to the buyer. Frank agrees. What the hell that about is not a never is a new day. I HAVE ANOTHER ONE OF THE MOST of the NIGHT SERIES OF IT'S A COLOR OF THE DAY. SO IF I HAD A COSTUME I CAN do it. But I don't. What do I have? I have a tooth that I can bring you enough. I have a big enough. That's what I have. I have a precedent. What's the precedent? That there's no never that's based on the costume. How would that be my the color of the day again of in other words finished life. Said the scarf. You say God is classic. When it comes to the of never. So if somebody worships an animal the animal does not become also. Right? It's not also the idea. It's not also stating that it's also like right. Why is it also like right? Is the that although there's a half car in the of this animal clapping head yet. But clapping the buyer say history of the Tsar. Say so so when a person worships the Tsar says a lot of things happening. Say me say the God say me say the actual of the Tsar the me say the God you're even of the Tsar you're doing the worst of imaginable. I see the cars and if you do a this all the carbons that have to be brought if the Tsar does it this parallel of it. There's so much that goes on me say the government me say the also. Right? Deals with the the Tsar becomes also by right the that was brought that becomes also. In the about I state. There is a costume in the of the way the Tsar that even though when a person worships about me say the God he's a regular of the Tsar. But me say the of the is not considered of the Tsar. WHERE IS THAT OF THE TSAR? It's not even also by there's no there's no of right about itself this is not going to be considered of the Tsar. That's the case said the it could be that's being that when it comes to the way it's different is saying that clapping the way it is a of the way the Tsar. Clapping the way you say yeah of the Tsar. Oh yeah I say the Tsar. It could be that's not if it's not of the Tsar clapping head yet that it's not of the Tsar clapping the way. And again that is not being a shame of the Tsar clapping the way. So if that's the case what then is this what is the that of is considered right never clapping the way. Said the Tsar I think there's a whole another day over here. And that is. We know that is a that's or never is also like right. A that's a of the of it. Is something that's also to be put on the what's the word? The word is because of the should never be a right that's the side of a should never be a is something that's also like right. Said the the reason a never is also like right is not because it's of maybe. But rather the reason it's also is because it was never by a WHICH OF THE OF AND REMEMBER CLAPPING the of the Tsar clapping the God is a regular of the Tsar. And if that's the case. Then that in and of itself would be the reason that would be awesome. So said the I can is the reason that never is a problem like right because clapping the way we look at it as being a shame of the Tsar. Oh yeah it's not of the Tsar. It's not a shame of the Tsar. IT'S THERE'S NO BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY EVEN THOUGH IT'S NOT OF THE TSAR YOU CAN'T DENY THE FACT. WHICH FACT? THAT at the end of the day there was a of the Tsar that was done with it. I mean that there was a of the Tsar that was DONE WITH IT. SO IT WAS NEVER BY A IT'S NO DIFFERENT THAN A THAT'S AND AT THE END OF THE DAY in that theme of should be also. So said the if you're going to go with the second side that's what's going on here in the what the was saying is as follows. The is saying that you see from about about is yet it's also like right. What's the it makes no sense. Is it of the Tsar is it not of THE TSAR? THE SAYS IT'S NOT OF THE TSAR. NEVER IT WAS a new day. What's this new day? There's a day that once it was never by a the what let it be that it was a or let it be that it was a or let it be that it was used as of the Tsar. But once it's never by a at that point it takes on a life of its own. Something that's never by a you can't PUT ON THE IF THAT'S THE CASE as the is with those that help that if I go AHEAD AND I WORSHIP MY FRIEND'S animal it's also GOING TO BE ALSO. WHAT'S THE IN OTHER WORDS HERE IT GETS A LITTLE SAID means I can't impose A ON YOUR THAT'S GOING TO SUDDENLY MAKE IT ALSO. I can't make it I can't make it I can't sell it. I'M NOT ABOUT ON YOUR BUT OVER HERE THE IS NOT ME SAY ANY THAT'S BEEN HELD ON THE ANIMAL. IT'S BECAUSE IT WAS NEVER BY A AND GUESS WHAT IT WAS NEVER BY A IF SOMEBODY'S SOMEBODY else's animal you're going to tell me of course not. At the end of the day IT WAS A THIS IS WHAT IT IS. SO HERE TOO SAID THE THAT'S THE TWO STEP. Once we see a partial of never so you know what we see we see A WHOLE NEW DAY A WHOLE ANOTHER WAY TO VIEW EVERY ANIMAL that was worshipped and me say OF THE TSAR BUT ME SAY THE fact that it was never by a and if it was never by a that's what the issue is going to be. But said the the state on the it's the only way to learn the saying is that every never is also me say the never by a it's not the clapping the way it's of the Tsar. The is that it was never by a. And being that it's never by a being that it's never by a and now already what's the difference if it was the that did or somebody else did it. End of the day the was done because clapping the God you're regular whether it's your whether it's someone else's and it's for that reason said the you shall be able to make the that he made. So said the if that's the case the that's in the over here and after again never a very is never of the Tsar. And the how you say isn't it a isn't it talking about when somebody worships his friend's animal? So what did the say? No going over there it's talking about where went and ask for so what was the I feel I of the Tsar. Maximum the of the and everybody what do you mean? Feel of the Tsar. That's just the but at the end of the day you were of the Tsar. Said the if never was also me say of the Tsar so then I can hear even if you of the Tsar by at the end of the day it's a of the Tsar. OVER THE FROM WE LEARN THAT really about can never become a of the Tsar. FOR WITH WHY IS IT ALSO LIKE RIGHT? BECAUSE IT WAS NEVER BY A. The of the Tsar. What do you mean I'M BETTER? I'M BETTER IF I'M BETTER THEN IT'S BETTER. I HAD A RIGHT TO DO IT. SO IF I HAD A RIGHT TO DO IT THERE WAS NO THAT WAS DONE. IF THERE'S NO THAT IT'S ON HOW COULD IT BE ALSO? SO I'LL TELL YOU WHY. Because there's a of and speak out that that's only because REALLY IT'S ANYWAYS. OH IF IT'S AND IT'S GOING TO BE ALSO THAT MEANS IT WASN'T never by a. YOU HAD NO RIGHT TO DO IT. NO. AND IF maybe you'd be better from the of the Tsar but YOU HAD NO TO DO IT. SO IT WAS NEVER by a if it was never by a or not be a never being totally in whether it was it's not EVEN TOTALLY IN FOR THAT WOULD BE SUFFICIENT. BUT IT'S NOT EVEN THAT is it is it also? Right? BECAUSE WHAT WAS THE YEAH BUT YOU CAN'T DO IT. WHO CARES I STILL DID IT BY THIS. THE THIS IS NOT ABOUT or what it's about is or also. That's what it's about. The wanted to say that should make it a never. But also it's better if it's better you can't be a never because never is also me say the fact that it was never by a and if it's better it's not a never by a and it's not true. When it comes to certainly over there even by it could be considered a because of said that the state on the of the Tsar the bottom line is. What's the clear clear take away? Again this is touched on almost the entire but besides for all the but it really touched on everything. What's the what's the bottom line take away the classic that if somebody worships an animal the it's not of the Tsar it's going to be of the it's going to be also. What's the of that of the Tsar? Is the of that of the Tsar that clapping the way we look at it as a of the Tsar where is the of that or not that a it's not of the Tsar. It's not of the Tsar. It's not of the Tsar. It's not of the Tsar. Not clapping head yet not clapping the way but clapping the way there's a new that if it was never by a that makes it also like right. You see over. Not all the things that come along with never are all in that theme. So there's an idea that if it was never by a it's going to be also if we take on the second side then it's mayor in a you shall be in the seventh of which is the the sheet in this whole in of the that the the Ravidan in his Sugya didn't understand. It also enlightens the Shaka of the tire between Rami Bar Chama and Rab Zeira and Rava in the Gemara of the Zera daf nun dalet amud alef. The daik.