Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
בענין רובא וחזקה רובא עדיף
2 views
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
The daff was made up of two parts,
right? First part of the daff will be
the shorter shorter part of the daff was
okay. The second part of the daff, the
longer part of daff was
zila.
What emerged from the end of the second
part of the which is something that we
already know is that not everybody even
holds that you go buster rub the lemon
is
there's a
here
discusses whether a mayor that's
or is only
maybe we'll talk about that tomorrow.
But for now, everyone knows that is that
the prim
on
right here on our
he makes the following observation. He
says we know say
so anytime there's a face off between
the first part of today's daf and the
second part of today's daf you have uh
this mano between the idea of
and the idea that we're the rule is
always better than kazak
if that's the case it should come out
that raor who doesn't go arrive
at the very least
he shouldn't go and
shu that there should be a mayor in that
doesn't go
and he says
that's what come because
doesn't go so if he doesn't go you
shouldn't go either over the years we've
mentioned
from the Yeshua in his in the first
and the when he asks he doesn't just say
that
that doesn't go he says it's
where goes
so you see does go and he's not
to say that we shouldn't go
that how could it be that
doesn't go that he goes by IF
SO HE doesn't hold up the better one
which is right but he holds up the
lesser one which is
says over the years we found that this
is already mentioned in the
end
that why is it that you don't find
anywhere that there's a
mayor holds you don't go bust but the
bottom line is the bottom line is the is
that if
andor doesn't go
arrive then
come out there may or shouldn't go
either and I was thinking just well we
learned we mentioned that from it's and
from it's a little bit mash that there's
a
who you don't go and we left it off with
a first of all how could it be a mandama
that doesn't hold and fr how could it be
an am that doesn't hold that you go
bazok how many
how many sugas are predicated on the
concept of if there's a mayor who holds
that you don't
from the
if there would be such a well then
would have a
and if that's the case he could always
say I hold like by the way this is a
heluto
so it's not a do under that also but the
bottom line is if you going to tell me
that from the fact that there's a in the
WORLD THAT'S IT'S THAT ALSO DOESN'T GO.
SO WE FOUND a we have a that doesn't
hold that you go maybe that's a to
understand
the fact that there would be that would
hold you don't go but either way are not
happy with this and if that's the case
it's
how's it possible that mayor doesn't go
yet he does go buster so maybe you could
Okay.
The second place on the ask the said
and the br and then the said
once we establish that you goba
certainly you should gobuba.
Once I have a for why do I need a for
why don't we say that once I know
soak where it's rife should work meaning
is meaning I know for sure is better
than okay so perfect
once you know works you should know
works as well I think
says
that's the we mentioned in the that's
question is
that didn't have a for
what was his where the speaks out it's
and we know
so even though it's true if I know I
know but there's a lot of limitations to
one of them is you can't learn uh from
something that's
for that reason it's not going to it's
not going to be okay but according to
according to the
is and I know it from a
the concept of and the reason is I know
it from which by the way let's revisit
what is the
that's only one
Rashi came out that what is it really?
It's not even the one or any of the
either it's
or it's learned from we have a over here
tucked away on the top of it could be
it's learned from because once I know
which means is not only the
is also the another that I think is good
to mention and that is we mentioned in
the introduction to the that a little
bit why is it that we're even talking
about
this is a
says
first
because the whole question of
it was only it was only from so once we
mention who was very much a part of the
tal oh I didn't know the such
You tell me who doesn't hold that
there's any in the whole world
that hasn't even
oh
he must have a new could be the
mention of
that's first second terrorist he brings
from
who said that the idea that is actually
not learned out it's actually not
learned out. What then is the mar to
it's learned that from the because the
although there's a that the animal's not
a tra as we saw in the but says that is
really going to and you see that you go
bust that's the
but the bottom line is without going too
much into that
what is saying in the second ter is is
that is not a if it was a once I know I
would know
if I goof And at this point in the gamar
the doesn't know that after you learn if
it could be at that point the wouldn't
ask [laughter]
but the bottom line is in real time the
gar doesn't know yet the doesn't know
these are two
in
this is in
and it's also inact
it's
says a it to but I think it requires a
tiny bit of an introduction that is
discusses the following case
there was a woman that went together
with her husband she comes back from
without her husband and she says my
husband died so
she's allowed to get married even is
allowed to get her Why I thought of the
terret is
that [snorts]
is believed to say even a woman is
believed to say and a woman is even
believed to say about herself. If a
woman would go with her husband and come
back without her husband she'd be
believed to say that she's allowed to
get married.
This is right. So in the event that
there was a her husband had a another
wife so the would be awes
the reason is because the back in the
day didn't get along very well. In fact,
that's the primary reason made his
forbidding and answering polygamy. But
being that we're concerned that this
woman doesn't like the Torah and maybe
she wants to get back at us. So maybe
she's going and lying because she wants
the Torah to get married, have another
family, and they're going to be as a
result. She's believed for herself, but
she's not believed for the
in the event that was a
but the husband was a meaning she's
someone that based on
how she was born is not allowed to eat.
She's a basis, but because she's married
to she's allowed to eat,
she's allowed to continue to eat.
meaning
we don't trust this woman
that we assume that if she wants the
continuing truma that her husband's
alive then himself is going to be okay.
So the Mishna says that a woman that
comes back from and says my husband died
the way we treat it from perspective is
very
as it relates to herself
is
as it relates to the
she's even
says
when the Mishna said that the isuma in
the event that she was about
Is it true?
Is it true even the said, "I'm having a
big problem with this Mishna." How do
you go ahead and mish treat one woman as
if she's
and the other one if she's
I can't fathom it. My I think what's
going on over here is is that
she has an ammon there's an idea that
maybe she's trying to be.
So it's for that reason we're going to
be
when the Mishna says that she's allowed
to eat Truma, it's only that she'd be
allowed to eat because we're treating
her as if she's married. But if she
wants to eat, there's no way IN THE
WORLD. YOU CAN'T SAY THAT THIS WOMAN'S
ALLOWED TO GET MARRIED AND THIS woman is
100% not allowed to get married.
You have to make up your mind. You can't
have a disaster. You could say
and you could even carve out and say
only being for one and not for the
other. But as it relates to saying that
she has an ammon for herself but she
doesn't have an ammon for the
but he says I'm not sure maybe
at first glance I think I have a and is
from the famous case of
what's the case? There were two roads.
One of the roads had tum there was so
much to that road that if a person
walked down that road it was inevitable
not possible that it became to either
way two people walked down the two roads
and then they were both Isaac and Tyrus
anymore is that in the event that the
two people went to a sh but they didn't
ask it at the same second they didn't
ask it at the same time the is
that each person is going to be
considered to be tired why because each
person was tired you have a suffix now
whether something happened so YOU HAVE A
IS EACH PERSON IS GOING TO BE OKAY.
Don't you see from here? Even though
it's impossible that they're both tar
one of them is but as long as he didn't
ask the kashi in the same second they
didn't come to the rub ofas. So this
person is going to walk out tar. That
person's going to walk out t now
over here and we're splitting the baby
in half and we're saying that yeah
you're going to be tired and you're
going to be TY
and if that's the case
as it relates to this could be yeah this
woman's allowed to get married and THIS
WOMAN IS ALLOWED THAT SHE'S still
married
but then says but I'm not sure. You know
why? Because it's
that when it comes to
in the event you would have two people
that have the same
where it's inevitable
it's inevitable that one of these two
people are it's that both of these
people are over there you wouldn't say
they're both Tommy so
but what if Ruben and Chim both have
And we know for sure one of them is you
can't say they're both because you know
for sure that one says I'm very confused
over here. I'm not sure what to do. I'm
thinking that when it comes to you, you
can't just go ahead and be and therefore
that when we say
if she was
maybe it's only true with but then again
I have on the one from I see if they
don't ask the question at the same time
they're both going to be assumed to be
but again from I see that even if they
ask the question at different times
being that one of them is you're not
going to say
so which one is it That was the resop
that's why he wasn't sure what to do
over here
and Zion B says let me explain to you
what's going on in this and let me tell
you what the pes is
that that's
if wants to go ahead now and issue a
they WANT TO SAY I'M TELLING YOU THIS IS
the way it is they can't issue a mid
where it's going to be a disaster for
two people and that's why the re I here
that this woman stands in front of a
court and bezen is going to say you're a
puny you can go ahead and get married
you're married 100% you could even eat
because how could be bestd issue
that's going to affect two people in two
contradictory ways I can't hear such a
and it's for that reason said
what do you see
it's not True is not a because what
happens by what happens by is is that
you have a suffic I'm not sure did the
person come to me did the person not
come what do we say
here's the punch line
it's
I have no idea WHAT HAPPENED SO IF I
DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED YOU LEAVE it
the way it is
needs that you go bust to the status quo
and being that I don't know what
happened. I have no idea how it how this
whole story played itself out. So just
leave it the way it is. But when bezdon
pass your because I have a safic if you
ever became tar your because you ever
became in those SITUATIONS IS NOT PASING
JUST SAYING I DON'T KNOW SO LEAVE IT THE
WAY IT IS. THE FACT THAT BEZDON would
have a titer in terms of how it's going
to play itself out that doesn't bother
me because it's not
that's not in fact if you wanted
I'm going to tell you what is that
when it comes to
you can't have a disaster WHEN YOU HAVE
THE SAME CASE like but if it's you're
not going to say what's because
that we treat the person as if he's
Tommy.
And by the way,
so you see that's
what's going on in this
on the one hand I have on the other hand
I have the two cases. But the way the
learns it up in that what was saying was
that is not
is the case of
because you don't find that ising a case
of direct disaster and the reason is
because all it is is just leave it the
way it is as opposed to
you're allowed to get married or
which that's a that's a ding that we're
invoking and that we're using over
there. [snorts] You wouldn't be able to
do it when it's
and really listen
is that is fundamentally different
fundamentally different than a regular
when Bezdon says
and when they say let's leave this at it
it's
the together of what is doing is not
that they're saying we'reing this the
way it is even though it's
but gather of the and the gather of the
is not is not that we have a
but rather there's a that when we don't
know what to do what we do is we leave
it at right you know in the real world
if you don't know what to do you have to
do something right the theoretical world
but bez has to do something you know
bezels getting paid the BIG BUCKS TO
THEY GOT TO DO SOMETHING BUT THEY HAVE
NO MAHAL THERE'S
THAT WHEN WE DON'T KNOW WHAT TO DO, JUST
LEAVE IT AT THE status quo. But
is not based on any it's not it's not a
bearer of any sorts because how in the
world is just think about it for a
second. Things change all day every day,
right? So just because something was
some away yesterday that means that's
the way it is now.
It's not being it's just an hug. I don't
know what to do. YOU HAVE A BETTER IDEA.
YOU HAVE A BETTER IDEA. TELL ME. I'm I'm
willing TO LISTEN. BUT THE END of the
DAY IS IF WE DON'T HAVE a better so then
what we go ahead and what we do is we
are that's the either way
that says
that's true is better than you know why
is better
The reason is better than is because the
holiest of IS THAT WHEN I DON'T KNOW
WHAT TO do
but to the extent I have a I know what
to do and being that I know what to do
that's what I am going to go ahead and
that's what I am going to do the reason
IS BECAUSE ONLY WORKS for there's no
bearer when there's a bearer there you
At the end of the day from
what you see is that is avar
there's no way to learn from that would
be mav from you could learn if there's
something called a kaza there would be
something called a but at the end of the
day when I have the that I have works
better than the kazaka because is mavar
and the kazak is not m and I can't learn
being a mavar from kazaka because kazaka
itself is not a mavara So
that's why even though we know we still
need you know why we need we need we
need to know that has the ability to be
we need to know that has ability and by
the way the reason
is
from the fact that I know that has the
ability to be once I know
the
is that
is when I don't know what to do I know
There's a beer called so now I do know
what to do. But here's the bottom line.
The bottom line is
not the t that the beer of is better
than the beer of if that's what it
meant. If I know the I would know the
beer of that was
based on this that really
is that I only work with
I have no bear. And that's why when I
have a roy and I have a beer, there's no
mark for but at the end of the day
and are fundamentally different. One is
a mav and the other one is not a m. It's
for that reason even though I would know
I would have no way of knowing because
how could I learn that something is
from something that in itself is not
either way I think it's pos
and I'll pee this red it's
from the
and from the in the beginning of and
it's really
and that is
that means doesn't go bus doesn't go
either because
that doesn't go the ter is the ter is
two different things NO WHERE SAYS I
DON'T go what is saying is I don't think
has the ability to be to me there's a
PHILOSOPHIC
>> [laughter]
>> BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS AT THE END OF THE
DAY I still see A SUFFIC BUT DOES THAT
MEAN THAT in Ra's world there's no well
if there's no kazak WHAT ARE YOU GOING
TO DO when you're not sure what TO DO
WHAT WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ALSO HAS
TO HAVE A fallback option what mayor's
court when they didn't know what to do
they said I don't know go kill
yourselves call him governor I don't
think that's what they did but and that
you GO BOS IF I'm both and one is a
better and you find doesn't hold OF THE
BETTER. YOU CAN'T hold up the last
two completely different tracks. It's no
sh it's true doesn't hold the RIGHT
still has to have a par of that's the of
why even though he's but at the same
time also holds a pit I think it's
this which is based on
we just mentioned but there's other as
well that you see this idea that
are completely different so again what's
the what's the takeaway today's daf was
really a tale of two
[snorts] zilbased
day even though come together how much
they come together even says
because how could you learn one without
the other the two
they're literally literally literally
one and the same but at the end of the
day as much as they're one and the same.
They're fundamentally different
because
and says that when in doubt, this is the
way you should GO ABOUT IT. BUT THERE'S
zero beer taking place when you have a
is they're both tools that were used by
to go about and to tell what you're
supposed to do,
but at the end of the day, they're not
one and the same.
>> [laughter]
>> that doesn't go bus
yet DOES GO BAZ DESPITE THE FACT THAT IN
THE WORLD of wins all day every day now
the truth is does really win all day
every day no there's one that is not
better than that's but right
but either way again this was just a a
short the shortest version possible with
a little bit of ra of olive as it
relates to the rest of the raid. Again,
every single line here is a by the way
just appreciate a little bit better. We
had 10 m, right? 10 m. If you look at
and they have caches how come we have
mentioned this, how can we mention that?
So let me buy all the sugas that we
spoke about just from going through the
gar if you went through the gamar with
tas you throw in another 25
and all the red and all the different
permutations of of when you go and is
the rash and the takuk this touches on
and all the
but for now we are going to stop Yeah.