Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
בענין פסול יוצא ובשר שיצא חוץ ממחיצתו
0 views
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
So as it relates to raid just one
foundational
maramakim
which is really more but very very very
much related to the first staff over
here.
So the P of
is a P that two months plus into we're
all very familiar with this is the P
that teaches us the to these
are the ideas that underpin
the to the of is that of
but in today's we saw a another
completely unrelated to that learned
from this as well and that is that
at that point it's going to be and we
saw really two very distinct
applications to this one is in the
sugasha
the other is in the world of kachch as
it relates to makasha there's a kesh
that's learned out from
the latter part of parishi that if you
the mother that has an ubber inside the
of the mother is going to work for the
as well stating that being that the
of the mother is the for the because as
long as it's there at the time of the
mother it's going to be there's a
concept that if the was
going to be why because it left it and
ONCE IT LEAVES IT at that point it's
going to be Another application for this
is
bas has
to be eaten but it has to be eaten
has
that once leaves it at that point
there's this lab in the of
okay the
means that that's a tra eight tra 70 all
the numbers of is going to be but
there's another
that really has nothing to do with and
that is that has a
at that point why is it together with a
very important part of this that's
once The tra always a traa. So too as it
relates to something that left its
makita once it leaves the it's as if it
always left the
in
this is
says
that left
becomes
And it's something that you're never
allowed to eat.
And even if it came back in, you're
still not allowed to eat it.
And if somebody eats a
gonna get maltus says the how do I know
that
says
once leaves it's
becomes like
we explained already.
So the Rambamar
of the most in the world and the
Rambam's telling me about which IS LIKE
THE MOST BASIC IN HE SAYS YOU WANT to
know why Ber of whether it be that goes
outside of it even if it comes it's
going to be IT'S
what does it say over there you know
what IT SAYS
SO BASED ON THAT says
that's going to be true in as well.
What's the mart?
If you want another take a look at
these
to this truth is if you think about this
for a second it's a it sounds like it's
aesh right is somehow related to
right does that ring a bell from
could be not right so uh what's over
there so let's take a step backwards
what's the shy right somebody asked
what's the gonna who saw the
better a little bit before you say that
the
is
believe it or not
these are the
but this really is the Mishna says
outside
says
I understand why if a carbon becomes or
the carbon would become it would require
it's a
how do I know that
this
but it's really all that requires so
says it's learned that from the
following
This is in the beginning of parish. It's
the we mentioned earlier
and the explains the whole
turn and he said
why didn't you eat this?
Did it have
Maybe it's because it was maybe the D
LEFT AND BECAUSE it left that's the
problem
says what do you see from this had it
left
or had it been it would have been so
verses you want to know the is something
called say the is the beginning of the
beginning of in other words the basic
elementary answer to the what's the
is
learned out from
by the way take a look
what the
is in terms of
that happens to be but it's for sure
learned out from is in this talked away
stating that it's and brings it in
that there's another and this is it's
learned out from
in other words there's two there's a
there's a
from
the par of the in the beginning of
parishes
And then also from
just to say this a drop better
carries with it a malus. It's a
just like if someone eats a trade he
gets malus if somebody would eat that
was in this instance you would get
malcus as well. fact that Ram says that
Ram says
so it's clear it's a lie really without
if somebody would eat from a
based on the he would also get malas
because it's a general that if somebody
eats
he also gets malas so really there's two
that are almost telling me the same
thing I I have
and then I have
which is the par of but both tell me the
same concept and that is that leaves it
is that it's
and if somebody's going to eat from it
he's even going to get malus just to
bring out the point if you take a look
says
what would be if
And it was right. It was jumping around.
This is breathing its last breath. And
it was when it came back is it's going
to be possible says Rashley
because
which for a lot of people that learn
Kachchum this is an introduction right
because you do if you learn Kachchum you
start second regardless of what's being
learned first this is The second
learning already
has tot
this concept of the stating that
the briskerv in his first piece and
safer on the rail
miktosh says that as much as it's mour
from the suggest that this
and
starts with this
gave us these two right here.
But at the same time
the two that we have over here
the
place what exactly the from where we
learned from the between
from that we learn that there's a gabul
called meaning we know there's a whole
regime of kachum the gabs you learn
kachum your lina and the pigle and all
the different that you have are you
holding. So you're just going to give
you know about that.
So all the different
but
that's not a
when he brings he says
sends you outside the bounds OF HE SENDS
YOU TO HE SAYS THIS IS VERY MUCH it's
and the iss clearly says that this
IT'S TRUE BY
JUST LIKE IT'S true by
that these two that we have over here
whereas
is like from and if
that if it has its and it goes from you
wouldn't be allowed to eat it. So why
because it's
and if you should have the same but
agrees that as it relates to that's and
that follows the
as it relates to
this is very much NOT THIS IS VERY much
it's the first
that said you have to see when you go
through this in the second which is just
as obvious and that is as it relates to
the
so that's true for the buser it's true
for theim it's true for the right that's
the big but on the fats that went on the
dam if it was subject this says
It's that's only true by like the
where the says
this is a in that has a
where the is
in the event that it goes outside of the
so
is true for
et
That's
and that's something that's going to be
true only with regards to the it's not
going to be true for anything else said
that it's to me this is the
which at first glance is a little bit of
a
we're not going to go through the whole
but just the
if would eat from
before this
is one of those fun
outside
she would get five malus
ate it was an it was before this outside
malus five times is not allowed to eat
an oil no one's allowed to eat you're
not allowed to eat and if it was outside
you get two malus number one because it
was outside of the kach had to be eaten
in you get another malus because it was
eaten outside
you get five and asks kashes if it's
five you're saying good say Maybe it's
more than five. One of the Mars caches
is
what about
you getus and for the honey you know
when you get malus
that's only true if you were allowed to
eat it inside the now if I ate it out of
the I'm going to get malus
but over here IT'S AN
SO THEREFORE IT'S NOT GOING TO BE A
PROBLEM. WHAT WAS THE SHOCK OF IN THE
GAR? THE GAR AND THE KASHA THOUGHT THAT
if there's a toad it's not let it go
outside and now outside of the you
is that
and it's when there's a
and it leaves THOSE
there's no bias in proverbally speaking
when it comes to an has
because it's but that's the second
between the general that everybody knows
about that comes from
versus this
and that is number one one is a one is
number two number two one is true for
all the of the cuz the of it is that
something with kadusha that leaves the m
of kadusha is now
the other is a whole different something
that has a if it leaves that it's going
to be a problem if that's the case it's
only true by buser
and even then only that has and that's
why the said
doesn't make sense shouldn't be subject
at all
says the brisk this is the second part
of the piece I want to say there's a
also in parad
it's on the over there what would be the
if you had a who sat down to eat the
carbon p and now the ber of the carbon p
left the kabur or left the bias where
the kabur is would the bey say would it
not
And it's a whole very very
every single person ever that sat down
to learn this learned that the ising
we know that there's when it comes to
has to be within there's outside
if it's going to be the what about the
with a concept that it has to be eaten
has to be eaten. So if it leaves the B
if it leaves the maybe it should be as
well says
the is a very big because
where the area that it's being from is
not more than the area that it's going
to
is more than and is more than you're in
this mim of kadusha where you're
supposed to eat it if IT WAS IT'S THE
BIAS DOESN'T HAVE more than outside the
bias. This whole of the should be when
it comes to the CARBON IS SAID to
that when the declared over here that
does when it comes to the carbon
ironically the didn't mean to what the
meant was
because once the says that the has to be
eaten with it has to be eaten within a
certain area. So it's like FROM
it's like any type of THAT HAS
if you take a look at the when the
brings the general. So we read the
says number one it becomes possible
and it's forever
because it says
if you take a look at the
carbon and this is empiric
Vanessa in his apartment didn't say his
only it's LIKE
THEIR DOESN'T EVEN TALK over here.
says the you know what is BECAUSE
THAT'S
NOT
it's
comes from the and if that's the case if
that's the case
We're benisive to the fact that there's
an
there's also a
but
like the intuition of the there really
is no leaves
but to say this
where DO YOU FIND SUCH A GOOD that's
over
the
is
the ra doesn't even say ple. Does that
mean it's not ple? I'm not sure how far
means it. But the bottom line is the
ramen didn't say could be the just means
it's
maybe from the I'm not sure but the
bottom line is is that the ra was
because when it comes to regular that
was
it's
based on as opposed to when it comes to
the carbon that's
it's coming over here and if that's the
CASE WHAT IT IS that's why the rab
saying all the said is that it's the
said they have one more one more is
not actually the
it's pericute the end of
he lists all the types of a for which
you get malus right so we know there's
rain
and there's uh sh lavin within the lav
The Rama makes a count. He says
there's 207 times you can get malus.
If you remember, we once spoke at a
rabbi with from but there's 207 times
that you get malus. And the goes and all
207 times that you get malus. Number 75.
If someone is
if somebody would eat from the carbon
outside of the
says you would get malusk
brings from the
on I think that's the
but the brings from the
on that he asks that if you go through
the entire the does not mention anywhere
if somebody eats a
that say the only one of the that were
that the Ram brings you would get malus
for is
referring to the carbon
and it's a PLEADUM SAID WHY WOULD THE RA
only mention carbon now the is like he
did in carbon based on his mas of
that if somebody eats from a carbon pes
that left it some
gonna get malus but here the ram
counting all the times to get malus. So
the Rama wanted to say you get malus for
eating of a carbon that was say why
would he only bring the carbon
that's the most obscure abstract example
of this should have brought the basic
any carbon that leaves it said the brisk
I'm going to tell you the reason is
because if you look earlier number 54
in one category any single time you have
that's ple that's the ra counts that as
what in the ra's of 27 Seven ord
count as what? If that's the case of
that's push that any of that was
included in number 54. It's included in
miktosh. SO THE RAH DIDN'T HAVE TO
MENTION THEM SEPARATELY JUST LIKE HE
DIDN'T MENTION any separately but
there's one said that's not you know
what that is it's the
like
it's because not it's not
it's not
it's NOT
if that's not included
That means its own number. That's number
75.
And you want to know what the tool.
So again
is
there's no question in the world. It has
a
and that is
from the beginning.
But at the same time there's a
component as well to that is the first
over here in perash
two between these two rash brings both
of them by the way the rubb is in that
rash but two both of these are brought
down in that but two one is ach
the other one is true for all kachum
etc. The other one is only with regards
to because it's all rooted in a baser.
The second half of this briskov is that
the
leaves that was only
it's only the second brings in
the
two
one in
and the other one in
Sanra