Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Zevachim 49
0 views
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Today's DA is
and we are six lines from the bottom of
today's being learned as a
so we're moving along in the beginning
of perk
which as we saw seven and a half years
ago is
technical from the standpoint that the
relate to the carbon are based on dres
and limudin. And as we mentioned so many
times, the only way to fully appreciate
these gimmar is by understanding the and
really having some level of mastery over
the terix. But either way, the first of
is that
and the has to be soften as well. And
really the avoid pun intended of
was what is the mur to the idea that
kadashim
and kabalas do
specifically the gumar focused on the
carbon katas and the reason the gumar
focused on the carbon katas is because
that's the way the paric begins the
first carbon mentioned in mikvahim is
the carbon katas In other words, there
are three general groups of
that were kadashim. You have the you
have the and you have the schlman. Now
there's a and you have the asham. Now
there is a that also was kadashim
was kadashim. But if you want to speak
in broad strokes you have the kas you
have the and the asham. Those are all
aim of kach kadashim. When we say
and the cabala has to be as well, it
means that it's true for the true for
the true for the which means in the
process of figuring out the we're going
to have to find the we're going to have
to find the for and we're going to have
to find a for the as well. Now focus on
the murus for the carbonas and what
emerged is that it actually doesn't say
anywhere in the murish that the carbon
is or has to be done. In fact the only
one of the carbon that are the
had to been is the carbon the says.
So how do you know it by the so the said
because as much as it doesn't say the
foolish suffering regarding the
but the does say regarding the
okay so
and the is
so if the is that means the is going to
be as well The Gamarra said, "How do you
know that the cababola of the had a be
bit of soften as well?" So the Gammorra
said that the immediately after
again it's talking about
says
right after the
says
the means. So not only
but also
that should be biten as well. The Garra
said, "Okay,
so whenever you see that, what you're
waiting for is to find a place with the
that was really the whole said all the
different have some sort of mention of
doing and at the end of the day
there's a
so we know now the
suff
for the and the
we even know that it's
where today's is going to pick up is how
do we know that the is that the and the
has to be by and it's and then we're
going to go to the carbon which is the
third category of how do we know that
the and the is something that has to
by a carbon and again not only
as it says
we have a that of a carbon
has to be in soften what's the that's
the easiest
in this whole world
referring to the carbon
by the way if you remember from
yesterday's daf theor said that really
it only says it by the carbon that's
being brought. How do you know the
carbon that's brought? So the Gmorra
says it says
the
para to the par on top of it
refers to it as a heckish. But the
bottom line is I know for sure
I know as well that the of
bits of
how do I know that the and the as it
relates to the carbon is now this line
of is actually a very very tricky line
of
mascul
And
says
the reason it's tricky is because in
yesterday's d we had no anywhere that
the of the carbon has to be buten. It's
also not a pos anywhere in the so it's
not like if your major parishes and all
the other tucked away in the you're
going to find it. It's not mentioned
anywhere in the Tyra. So the question is
after yesterday's said
it's not true. we didn't have a mar I
think the easiest is the of the makubat
says and that is that although it's true
it doesn't say anywhere in the
cabala
of the carbon had to be biten but the
did say that the of the carbonus had to
be biten and how did the say that the of
the carbonas has to be biten the said
And the next words were
so we say that just like
so
it's mashma then that the
would have to be where the of the has to
be and that is bits of either way if you
look at even suggest maybe there's a
different gear
because really just piphat usually and
ashkan segways and flows very
beautifully from everything we saw up
until that point and in this case really
we didn't have anywhere that mitzvah by
would have to be but the bottom line is
what's the now of the
how do you know when it comes to the
both going to be
some
we know it
with the whole D soften. I only know
from the what does it mean I know from
the says you should check the and you
should do the of the
and still you see it's
the it's the place where the soft
then certainly it should be meaning
we're looking at the almost as and the
which is
is so
itself certainly should have to be but
the says I don't think it's
because
maybe at the end of the day is more than
and the reason it's more than because
and it's not only it's
as opposed to which is not so maybe
which is
it has that so and soften is going to be
as opposed to the soor said
you didn't understand
right he wasn't saying
in the traditional sense so now you can
go and you could ask
meaning the traditional sense would mean
that I could say no maybe because
what the meant to say was a little bit
differently
Where do you find anywhere? Where is
there a precedent that a tuffle should
be more than meaning where something is
learned out from something else or where
something is considered on some level
subsidiary to something else something's
a to of something else that the should
be more than that's not something you
find. So it's not so much the of so that
you can ask a on it. The point is at the
end of the day is learned from Katus is
the proverbial
is the proverbial and if that's the case
if you find by anah or you find by a
that's often as then certainly
in the sense but proverbially speaking
certainly without question then should
have to be
is that so and this is going to really
take us to the first third of in other
words the saying that the
is
based on the fact that if the which is
to it requires
certainly the as well and it's based on
this assumption
so on this the says is that so I'll
bring you three rias and we're going to
jump all over shas Now to find these
rias and try to dig up precedent for the
idea that maybe could be
let's take the case
is something that you could be right
everybody knows that
stating that if you buy something with
you can't be it's a
if somebody buys something
became
you want to be ped go ahead and be said
you can't be something that's both with
but rather what you have to do with is
you have to go ahead and bury it but
what do you see from here that in the
laws of
it's more like to be
than something that was bought with
money of now that's posit that the micer
is to the miser and yet you see a in the
over the
no such thing that you're going to find
the you see it by says
it's true this of that
you cover that you can't be is a it's a
it's a in something that was bought with
but that comes and the reason is because
in order to
The kadusha has to be on a certain you
have to have a certain level of kadusha
in order for pion to be if something's a
little bit kadesh you can't be ped
because it's not kadesh enough to
facilitate opinion you actually need a
higher degree of kadusha in order for it
to be now subject to the concept of pion
the reason
and not
is precisely because of the fact that
the sheni is moreish because it's the
and the
is only
it's less kesh as a result it's not
subject to opinion. You're right. It's
manifest as a
over the but really it's the opposite.
It's it's a that comes but in its
foundation what it really is is a as a
result it's not a
suggest bring you another case. What
about again what's is when somebody is
makish an animal and then he has sellers
remorse. He says you know what why was I
makish this animal? I should have been
makish the other animal. What's the when
he says that
not only is the original animal going to
remain kadesh but this other animal that
he thought that he wanted to be Makdish
instead is going to end up becoming as
well. Now is that when it comes to
even on an animal that has a even if
this is a very big because if somebody
wants to be an animal that has a
now to be clear it's
right
but we know that once an animal develops
its
underlying
status of hectish changes. It's not just
that a pun has a and as a result I can't
be mak
it it's something that affects the DNA
the essence of the actual
you can't be something that has however
that develops you could be p and the
reason is because it actually it's
becomes altered and now it's at the
point that if you want to be p it's
known as and if you want to redeem it
now be able to redeem it. The time is
we know that is on an animal that has
yet
that if you want to go ahead and you
want to do a
on well you're never allowed to do a but
if you do a this is the of right if you
go ahead and you do a on an animal that
has
is the is going to be so what's the ta
the is that That's posh that
of being makish is tough to the oen of
being mish. So if I want to be mish
something in the traditional sense and I
do it to an animal that has a hish is
not. So how could it be that if I take
an animal like that and I make it that
the hish is going to be and the reality
is that it is. So he's saying there's an
idea that could sometimes be more than
the but says it's not a and the reason
is because
you're making an assumption that is
tough to the I could actually make an
argument that on some level if someone's
something it's a better form of hectish
you know why because if somebody goes
and he makes something hectish so the
hectish is coming from the right
you're being the kaduca that right now
is going to rest upon the soul of this
animal. As opposed to if you make a
you're not creating a new form of
hectish. What you're doing is you're
leveraging an existing hectish. You're
just transferring it
right. You're taking that hectish and
you're moving it over to this other
thing. So there's an argument to be made
that if I want to be a on a that has a
that's something I could do but with a
hect already is and all I want to do is
I want to transfer it could be it's
easier to make a transfer than to go
ahead and to something says I don't
think this is a to the idea that a tough
can't be more than says let's take a
third stab at it
what about a carbon
had to be treated like a carbon but
here's some that don't relate to the
carbon doesn't require doesn't require
and there was no mitzvah of with
but let's say you have of a carbon so we
know from the first par there's
different types of
either before or
a that was set aside and then you lost
it so you another one and then you found
it right there's a whole bunch of
different examples
of what do they all have in common we
know is right now if
that means the of the
but what do you see from here what you
see from here is that at the end of the
day uh is in ways more than a p because
a p doesn't require the p does the p
doesn't require p does The pes doesn't
require
the does. Now what's the and what's the
tuffle when it comes to the pes and the
this sounds very easy the is the yeah
you see that the is the itself says
you're going to tell me that
is a great example says
now we knew that right so what's the
beingadesh in the terrace but the
that as much as we refer to aer as a
really
it's a that's what it is and if it's a
so has certain dem that doesn't have
certain that doesn't have and that's
fine the point is if
would retain its
status of nor
so you would say the pes doesn't require
these dim of the
that does it's impossible because the
can't be more than the gather
is that it's not anymore
of the it's not now it's that it could
happen and it happens when it's a but
here's the bottom line this second when
you're doing and you're bringing you're
doing but you're doing it is not on a
you're not doing it on a you're doing it
on a so the fact that you have that
That's neither here nor there. The
bottom line is the took three attempts.
Strike one, strike two, strike three. At
the end of the day, the holds up and
that is
we have no and if that's the case, this
is the first that the brings.
What is the that
is going to be when it comes to the
what's the first of the
point is
and
why not
but in this
because
when it comes to It's
so in this world of there's no question
is the says it with as opposed to the
it's wherever you do the that's the yeah
wherever you do that do this oh clearly
it's the
that's the first the second is a much
shorter it's one line says the says
where does it say so it's that
At the end of the day, why did the just
say
it's often right? Why did it say
you could always ask these cases? But
here the asks it and that is why does it
say
for and again this pos not only for
we went with the
says as well because the next words
after
right so the bottom line is I have and
the fact that the mention
in the par of the if it's a that's how I
know It's going to be when it comes to
the according to the first I know it
from the according to the second I know
it from
that I have by the so we address
yesterday we addressed
first 20 minutes of today's and now
we're going to shift our attention to
the carbon again the carbon is also
kadashim and as a result it's included
in the of the kados and both have to be
biten the question is how do you know it
now it's not anywhere in the that take
the
only time it says that clearly is by the
question is how do I know by the
how do I know the requires says the
says
that's pretty good right the said like
this
But the bottom line is again just like
by the says
which means by the says the same exact
thing says
okay.
So the Gamarra says what does it say
right after
the next words are right
and we learn from the even though is
talking about the right
that the
has to be in as well says
how do you know that the himself has to
be so that's also something that the
garra had addressed in the previous
staff regarding
How do you know regarding the auction
that the macabo has to be soften? So the
gar says it could have said
what does it say instead
would being
sra and the boy of s is coming to be
marba not only the but theo
as well. So the bottom line is how do
you know the
had to be soften it says
the next words of how do I know even
so I know how do I know that it's so
says this is another now this other that
we're about to mention now is going to
be malava us for the majority of the
remainder of So we have to get this P.
This P is in
it's in Paris and it's talking about
so the when he
became Tar including in his purification
process was a set of carbon one of which
was a carbon ash. And the Tyra says
regarding the brought
an interesting
lot going on here. So the Torah says
that the
should be where it should be.
Wow. Till now it was always
right.
of the
okay and then the says do it in a in a
very very holy place right we know what
that place is
that this is like right
but either way says the is another that
says that the
talking about a specific type of but had
to be done in the place where you
know you had a
mitzvah and it had to be soften. So if
that's the case, that's why I know the
now I already had a for a that was the
original
that's about the general
here
to teach me that it's going to be says
could I really that
the second mention of regarding the from
the par of the
for the Halloween price and this price
that we're all familiar with
if there's something that was included
in a
to me about this
you're not allowed to return it to its
cloud
until the now is going to give an
example of it and the example of it is
so it's not like we're even telling that
talks about something that we think is
relevant to this. We're talking to a
price that talks about this and that's
how we're asking the gospel. Let's just
explain the concept. The concept is if
you have a
and based on that you would assume that
oh it's included in a right
it's included in the
so you would think it should be a
regular ash if something now is
and it's there's some about this now
that doesn't really pertain to the rest
of the so for example in our case if I
would tell you that there's something
unique about
that is not something that it shares in
common with all the other. Well, now as
far as I know, you can't treat it like
an asham with regards to anything
unless someone says, "No, I want you to
treat it like the cloth." Now, as the
Bryce is about to demonstrate, this is
not only an example, it's the example.
It is the example Kazal gave for this
rule. And as a result, there's nothing
we're going to be able to learn from
this says. Let's see. What's an example
of
what's an example of this?
Didn't have to say
why did have to tell me. Why does her
have to tell me that this is like a like
it's it's it's an every is like a just
learn the fee I'll tell you why
because you find that
was singled out and it has a certain
that other don't have what is that
because they took the dam of the carbon
and they put it on the thumb of the hand
of the mats on the thumb toe of the mira
on his
ear, right? So, you would have thought
being that the was all these new related
to the
room. Maybe this is shocking. Maybe
there's no I don't know. Maybe that is
the maybe the of the mitz is put it on
the maybe you don't even put anything on
the maybe there's no even on the
requires blood to go to
but what's the bottom line what you see
from this price is that is the classic
example
In other words, as far as we know, once
the said this
boy
with the dam of the
at that point everything you know about
a carbon is null and void and the only
way I'm going to now know even the most
basic as basic as I have to do with all
those things I'm only going to know if
the is going to tell you before. So
what's the gimar timing that you want to
know how I know that the
and the
of the
is because the tyra said it once by a
and the
reason the had it repeated by the m is
because had the not repeated it by the I
would think it doesn't apply to the what
do you mean it's true for all no because
the
so maybe that's why the
but it's not and it's not
so if that's the case there is no mart
but the says I think I still have a mart
you know why
once the says that you
in the place that you
so why does the have to say
you're right from the fact that it says
I don't know the reason I don't know the
is because maybe is different and
therefore the has to tell me about but
the was just the opposite tell it to me
by the ash which you have to tell it to
me but once I know by
I'll know it by so
and you want to know how I know it's
from the original one. So the says like
this if that is really tall enough
that's good.
If you are going to tell me that anytime
you have uh
when we say that you can't assume
anything regarding the actually
that's true could be only with regards
to the pr but what about if I want to
learn the cloud from the prat that maybe
I could right let's let's take a a step
backwards for a second as it relates to
this
something was it was
I can't assume anything of the as it
relates to the prat
what about in the reverse could I assume
something about the cl from the pr I
can't assume anything about the to the
pr but could I assume something about
the pr to the cl I everything about the
cl is null and void clapp the pr but
let's say there's something unique about
this pratt I think I can maybe suit to
the cloud. Could I or does this meter
get in the way? So says
that as much as it's true once something
was
and I can't learn anything about the
cloud to the prat but I could learn from
the pr to the cloud then it's very good.
What does it mean then it's very good?
So then why the have to tell me by you
told by the
so that's your but if you're going to
tell me
but if you're going to tell me that this
meeting goes both ways that once it's
I can't take anything from the over to
the and I can't take anything from the
over to the clu
it's then I need it but says the so
again so then we're stuck where is my
second for the asham I don't have one.
And if that's the case, then
the says, "No, I'm not getting past
this. This is where the mar is going to
be. We're going to find it somehow."
What does that mean? What did the say?
The said
and then it said
once the says
why does it have to say
you're going to tell me it's a
and therefore I need to tell you bearish
that all that of the are going to apply
to this as well. But guess what? The
told it to me. The said
what is
meaning are going to apply to this. If
that's the case,
why the have to say
you'll tell me because I can't learn
that from don't have to learn it from
you can learn it from the end of the
concludes and says
no in this itself in this itself the
told me twice the told me twice that the
has to be said
And then the
time is even if you're going to tell me
that this is
and therefore you can't assume anything
from this. But once the says
well at that point I know the was just
to the cloud. So now that me is off the
table. Why does it have to say
if it would say it once
that's
I need to say but the said it twice
the one time the general one
that's to be
but in terms of now why do have to say
in other words
once the
now it's already back in the cloud of
why have to mention
still you could always argue
even though it says but isn't there mock
to say that that's not referring to
every last regarding the carbon that
should always be treated like the maybe
it means the mean
the things that require
but as relates to that doesn't require
by itself and require
soften. So maybe that's why the had no
choice but the are over and say
to teach me that not only is the treated
like a regular ash regarding things that
require kahuna but it's treated like a
regular ash even regarding things that
don't require kahuna such as but the
bottom line is the pk is v not extra if
the pusk is vit not extra How do I know?
So the says I'll tell you because if
when it says
it's only being things that require not
then
we're talking about we're talking about
that is a very very inclusive word. It's
coming to say that it should be like is
regarding every last not only the
require even the don't require such as
the bottom line is once it says so I
know already that even though
is we treat it like a regular and a
regular I know needs soften so why is
the same by the you should go ahead and
you should check it bit soften that's
the bottom line is what's the regarding
the carbon
that
has to been
regarding that's
as well. Next words are the rabb
also has to be. Okay, that's only
how do you know that it's going to be is
because the tells me a second time that
the had to be where does it say it? It
says about the what does it say about
the
a second time that's
how could that be a second extra source
to teach me that's talking about the and
the is the prototypical example it's
literally
of
with the rulers
and being that you find that is so
unique, right?
So maybe you think there's no and that's
why the had to tell me that you should.
It's not necessarily extra.
It is that it's true what you're saying.
This is the prototypical example. But
believe it or not, as it relates to the
terrorist did it twice because this same
P it goes and says
and in words I know that this asham is
treated like a regarding everything not
even only regarding the things that
require but even regarding the things
that don't require kahuna
the extra emphasis on but the bottom
line is is I know from there already
that it's treated like a regular asham
So if that's the case I already was
have to say
it's extra if it's extra it's
so now from here until the two dots the
next uh 10 to 15 lines the garra is
going to pivot a little bit and really
this pivot is going to take us into
tomorrow's daff and even into the
following daff and the gumar is going to
discuss a that we've encountered already
several times and that is
when it comes to there's a dinish
anything that you know only as a result
of
does not have the ability to go now and
teach
something else.
So if this is something I know,
you can't take another hesish and pay it
forward apply this
even further. Now what about if
something's
could I now use it to learn?
We're going to see this all in
tomorrow's. What if something was
could it be? We're going to see that in
tomorrow's as well. Right now we're
going to be very very focused.
We know the rulershar
is going to pivot to this right now. Now
why the pivot? Because what we're going
to see is two to this big cloud of
the first of the two is this of the and
not only this the words of the
everything that we've been talking about
for this last segment of the says the
right jumped off the page when it comes
to the
why is to tell me do In the place that
you shacked the katas and you shuck the
oil. We do shack the katas and soften.
Where do you shake the oil and soften?
Why is the ter to tell me in the place
that you shack the kas and the place you
shack the oil? just to make the the cash
a little bit stronger. Says in the place
where you says that in multiple places
where should you the place that you but
when it comes to the
it's not to just say in the place you
should in the place
and in the place
and asks the obvious question again.
said it's tell you why.
And just a little bit of a disclaimer,
this next
is tricky. It's tricky.
The first time you learn it, it's
tricky. The second time you learn it,
it's tricky. The third time you learn
it, it's tricky because it's a hard gim.
It's just it's not hard hard. But as
we'll see, but either way, I'll tell you
why.
had the only said that the should be
like the meaning in the place as opposed
to the place meaning had that been what
it said I mean I would have thought how
do I where do I know that needs often I
learn it from the okay if that's the
case
it's
and if it's a how could it go now and
beam
so I wouldn't have even known that the
has to be its
I know but what am I supposed to do
and
can't be
so it's for that reason
said ra right away that you want to know
why the had to be
because had the only been and not
I wouldn't have even known the didn't
soften when it comes to cuz I would have
said
but
told you answered half the question.
What about the other half the question?
Why you mention so you explain why you
can't just say okay but just says I'll
tell you why. Because had it said and
not said I would have thought
I would have thought that
is
you'll tell me we'll explain this in a
minute or at least we'll try
that if
so why did have to
could have said in the place that you'll
tell me I wouldn't note. No, I would
know it's often because
you're telling me is
so from
that is right the let's just say that
so the fact that the would say that I
would know already that
just by virtue of the fact that we're
mentioning as opposed to so why do you
have to mention and so that I should
just say
because otherwise why even mention just
mention the but says it's not a because
I will always say
because it's not you want to know why
the say
because what's the right coming full
circle to the beginning of the is the
and the is it makes more sense to make
the
reason
The went out of it was
again what does this mean
was a very straightforward theory says
in the place
and in the place now and both and this
is the way of saying that you
the question is why did the have to say
and either says or say someone says I'm
going to tell you why cuz had it said
and not said let's
have thought that even though the said
but I can't learn a toughen from there
why because how do I know I know because
is learned out from it's
so I wouldn't know what the ter is
trying to tell me so to just say is
immediately completely off the table.
Let's hit the pause button right here.
First of all, why we talk about hkish?
Who say anything about where's the heck?
The say
so it's interesting that refers to this
as a heckish. What
the
is how could it be that if the Tory
would tell you
in the place that I would say no I can't
learn anything from here because how do
I know is and you want to now learn
from a second
that's very nice if you have a
generalish right
I don't know this part should be like
that part you have this general heish so
you want to Now learn a a from a
bag that's the but
so how could it be that I wouldn't know
of
I don't know figure out what to do with
the but what's that option that if we
would have only said I wouldn't have
known this
are very bothered with this which means
we can go right and just say iron but
it's But
that's why the couldn't just say because
again had the just said believe it or
not I wouldn't even know that requires
okay but was let it just say if it would
say not say how we know everything is
not
how we know everything you're right but
you want to know why the terror said I'm
going to tell you why the reason the
said is because the wants to teach you
the of
That's why the because the
because the wants you to know this
that's good for what the is objective is
there's a very important critical that
permeates
the is trying to find a place to fit it
in this is where the decided that is the
appropriate place to teach us this where
do you see this in in this because what
Tyra is doing is the Tyra is telling you
in the place that you and in the place
that you can just tell me the place why
do you also have to tell me the place
that I'll know everything that there is
to know is true you would you would not
soften if it only said but wants you to
wants you to realize you if I would have
just said and I would have said you
wouldn't have known the why because it
would have been a
package. That's why Moses are telling
you that's how you know the package.
Couldn't you just have said for that
price? That was the follow just say
because if you could learn from the
backage. So why say so why do I need and
to like see it as in blaring lights just
tell me and why you say oh that's not a
argument because you said because that's
the that's the right it makes more sense
to focus on the than to focus on the
says the if I tell you and I tell you to
tell me that you don't have to tell me
so must be there's something else I want
you to know yeah I want you to knows you
can't learn from. That's what I want you
to know. I want you to know you can't
learn from. How do I know you can't
learn from Katus? By telling me and
either ways
says from here. What does it mean from
here? I have a different says
we just said that the
is the parish of the fact that the says
that the should be in the place that you
and the place says I have a different
the says and this is talking about the
of the
so we know that there were a lot of
different types of right there was the
good old fashioned
you're a regular person doesn't have
that amaz
then you have the
who is
he brings a right you have the par of a
mistake that made you have the that's
when the makes his mistake what if the a
was so that's a special in terms of if
the does it what animal he brings and if
the zebra does it they have to bring the
par and the right there's a lot of
nuance when it comes to the different
that's why the are exceptionally tricky
from the perspective going back to the
disclaimer in the beginning of the d
because of all the different types of
you have all these talking about and
they could all be talking about
different types of so you always have to
know what kas am I talking about that's
like the first thing that you always
have to figure out when you go through a
gar like
The says
this is talking about the
it says
that you should take the of this and
you should lift from it. You should
remove
there goes to all the different body
parts of this animal that are going to
end up going on the
and these are all the same parts that
you took from the when you're bringing
and you should go ahead and you should
bring it is
that the Tyra went and the Tyra tuk long
went through different of this animal
that are included in the of the
and then the Tyra says that this is
going to mirror the
says the words of
why write it
if it's to tell me that mirrors is of
the
is what the terror said laid it out
already had not told you what the just
says do the way you do the I got it but
the tells you exactly what you're
supposed to do why does the have to
mention the furish that it should be
like
says the ra talking
this is it's because the wants
that you should know that just like the
we're jumping now from the
so the
should be the same way. The reason the
told me
by the
is because we need to learn the
having this from the
therefore the wrote in an extra time by
the
okay what's the point there the point is
and the
is
as it relates to the
it's not something that's mentioned
how do I know it from the power which
poses a problem and the reason it poses
a problem is because if it doesn't say
anywhere by the pariah that the way you
do the is including the
then I have no way of being malam to the
because the
itself I only know from somewhere else
that somewhere else is the
by the way if you remember from
Right? It's burnt down from
have no ability to go ahead and to teach
it.
You ready? That's why the road
by the
command so that it should be as if the
wrote not by the Mia because it says it
there but by the now the Tyra wrote an
extra sentence by the Mia. beh
but the bottom line is if it's now
so now you're not stuck with
and that's why the went ahead and the
wrote it but says but what's the bottom
line what's the bottom line you know
what I see from here what I see from
here is a
why write these words regarding the
it's an extra phrase the terror says it
must be let's do this again it must be
the reason the wrote that extra phrase
by the
I have already a heckish that is always
treated like the par that's a general
heish that underpins all these the is
because I want to learn
from
and if I didn't have an extra mention by
the
to make it
I wouldn't be able to learn
from you know why cuz how you learning
How do I know
from
that to circumvent this issue? What the
went ahead is the wrote these words of
to make
not merely
but to make it
if it's so now it's not anymore as a
result but the bottom line is from the
fact that the said these words
I see what I need to see and that is
but continues used for a few more lines
again is the one that said this, right?
So
and he asked him the big why the just
tell me the of
the why have to tell me
some terror is being okay being the
terror is being terror doesn't want to
say it I'll tell
but write to this
to that.
But here the said it a whole sentence.
So for the same price instead of saying
just tell me that there's a by the
and if the would tell me there's a by
the
so I'll know what I need to know. says,
"No, what do you mean?" Ra said,
"Had the said it and never told it to me
through this roundabout way, I would
have thought
I would have thought that
is really meaning you're right. If my
whole goal over here is to know by the
and the wants me to like really know it
even in a way. Yeah. The would have just
told it to you. But the whole objective
of the is to learn the
of
and the only way I know that is by the
not telling it to me and having to come
on to that says what do you mean? will
tell me
you'll tell me that what do you mean why
did the have to save the of
requiring this I can know it anyways
from
and if
I'd be able to be mamitted forward now
to
in other words even if the would have
by
the fact that it requires this I would
still
and the reason I would still it is is
because I would argue to myself why the
to tell me by
why is it necessary to be told by
I know by the m and anything that's true
by the power of is true by the through
the so why is the telling it to me you
know why the is telling it to me because
the wants you to be able to pass it
forward to
And
that's why I have to tell you. So what's
the difference? If I tell to be
if I tell you and it makes more sense to
say by the so tell to me by the you're
going to tell me because I needed to
know
and know it because why does have to
tell me anything? It's when you wake up
in the morning without an extra P. So
says it's not true because I would argue
that
if all the Tyra would have done is the T
would have said don't know where to put
the commas here. If all the right try to
say that a h 100 times but if all the
terra would have wanted was to if all
the terra would have done is told me
that there's a special when it comes to
you can't make any what's the deal why
do you have to tell it to me by by learn
it out from the
wants to tell to me
wants to tell me it's not a you're going
to buy a den that's going to alter 50
Because why
that's not going to work. Therefore,
that's why the did this whole
the went ahead and the told it to me
again, but didn't tell it to me.
Pun intended. But rather the terror told
it to me where the terra told it to me
in the par of the
that's not like a situation where
didn't say the said the words
I know it anyways the is if all I have
is a I can't pass it forward to see
that's why The Tyra has to tell it to me
again to make it as if it's now that
it's if it's now I could be but what's
the bottom line you see from here.
So we're going to obviously stop here.
But in terms of what the is the
what's the short answer 50 into
either it's learned out from the or it's
learned out from the
more specifically either it's learned
out from the of the or it's learned out
from the of the and even more
specifically either it's learned out
from the fact that the said
that of the of the has to be in the
place that the was the could have just
said
why the terra say and to teach me that
had it only said I went to because
that requires
that's how I know that's the
or it's learned out more specifically
from the words in the par of the parsiah
where after the tar details exactly how
you're supposed to do and all the body
parts that are included specifically the
and it says
the same exact way that the
already told me what you're supposed to
do and if I mirror it with what you do
with the I know that that's what you do
with the why tell me that'll
I anyways know the there's a general
heish from ago. So why do I need this
again the terrace because
has a double fate. You have to know it's
but it also was put in this world for a
purpose to be the how that is going to
be done and it teaches it via had I only
known
I would never be able to pass it forward
to
that's what had to tell me a second time
now it's like it's oh if it's like it's
now it has the ability to O and
again we're stopping here
exhale. So as it relates to raid so two
weeks ago parasyak
we went through in the raid bites some
of the crim
says that when emerged from the table
the very first thing that he did was
And
we went through different
that
discuss as it relates to the carbon the
in general the
this week's parish is par
and I think it's
to continue on that theme very much
and focus on the para uh that's
mentioned in vira and that is of course
the aa so the story of the aada which is
a a story that literally is blighting us
through the has so many components to it
but there's a very component to it and I
think
to go through different we'll start
tonight and we'll try to be with a part
two and a part three during the course
of the
Raisetic
in his shir mala
asked a bombasha
on a med
in Paris. The med says that when told
and I want you to go
and you should bring him as a carbon
says the magic
and he said
is it possible to bring a carbon without
a I'm not a how am I supposed to go now
and take my son and bring him as to
bring a carbon you have to be a
told him
I already took care of that I preempted
your question I already appointed you as
a
that's what the means when it says in
you are a forever it's in this medish
that Abrao's first reaction to was how
could I bring my son as a carbon I'm not
a in order to bring a carbon you have to
be a and said you're saying good however
truth is this idea is expressed in other
as well it's an it's
that
had to be established as a co in order
for him to be able to execute his
mitzvah of the and ali asked that I
don't understand. We know the Mishna
says then
that as much as it's true that in order
to bring a carbon on the MSB you'd have
to be a coen but that's only true on the
misbay. However, bishas had their balm.
When carbon were brought on balm, there
was no requirement for the person
bringing the carbon to be a in fact the
Mishna says
who used to do the
used to do the it was
it was
that moving forward now the is going to
be done by a coin. So may he said what
was Abrau's Tina and was mim to the Tina
that how could I do the I'm not a a why
do you have to be a this is not in the
mdash this is not the isk
is being brought on a b if is being
brought on a bummer you don't have to be
a now if anything what should have asked
was am I am I not a you have to know but
this is not to write what's the
right
and to the extent that this was
not something that requires a and said
that the emphasis is the catch is even
sharer because that's this is not the
first time ever brought a carbon the
beginning of par the says that built
rightem
now says what does that he was being
but
that was meant for so it's
this is not the first time is bringing a
carbon and never seemed to have an issue
about the fact that is not a pump now
it's a bombash so a male lady had
shot based on something that he heard
from a great gagyan who was a muik of
the brisker ravel chatekch
is incidentally featured very
prominently in this forum of the mishier
he always refers to his uncle the great
[ __ ] ravelik and in fact in mishar alvi
inv this is a madur kamo it's at the
very very end of the cafer It's not the
last tickle.
He brings this as well that he heard
from his great [ __ ] his uncle.
So revel was once a mismed and it was
and he went over to the grizz and he
asked the grizz everyone knows the says
after the told
so looks up
he sees an
Why does the have to say that he brought
obviously it was right just say
why have to say that that was brought
says the reason is because
every one of the avoid that did with
this ay he said a he did an avoid and he
recited a he did an avoid and he recited
He would say,
I really was so ready. I was so prepared
to be my son. No, I'm going to instead
bring this but I'm going to do the
right. He asked me
that's what he said when he did the and
then he did this. He said
and then he did and he said
and then he did the
and is a borious it's also a sovel as he
said that I don't understand one of the
things it's that did with the was he
See he said that what's why did Abrau do
he [ __ ] with this the reason is because
it was an
one of the unique related to a carbon is
that it required and then after
that the
was no din he on a carbon that was
brought on Obama and being that this
carbon was being brought on Obama right
there was no Mishkan there was no Bikto
so if that's the case if that's the case
the chic asked the briskov why is there
a he going on over here what's this
is
that not only did
he but he took the skin and a gau was
made from it and years years later
generations later centur Later, Elio
Yoani would get a hold of that gar and
this would be his magical gar that the
novi talks about. It came from the skin
of this aisle. But the bottom line is
that was his kasha. Where is the hid
over here? So the brisker told him so
the briskar told him that if you take a
look at the infernom
a few times
right the
is very very precise
and you're never allowed to make the in
a place that's not in that very precise
placeto
says is
then continues there's a that everybody
has
that that the place that built when he
bought the from
that's the place that
that's the place built his
when he emerged from
That's the brought their carbon
that's brought his carbon when he was
born. That's the place he was born from.
So the said that if you take a look at
the
says twice that the took place in the
Why does have to say it twice?
The first time the Rambam says it,
what's histogram
saying that as much as
took place
and as much as you would think in that
the of the was on a bomb and if that's
the case of the
was
that really the together of the was it
took place in mik it didn't take place
in mikdash it took place in mikt of then
it took place in mikdash and if that's
the case it's governed by all of mik if
in the mikdash would go and he would
bring a carbon there be a mitzvah of if
there'd be a mitzvah of there had to be
a mitzvah of as one of the I saw in May
doesn't bring this but this of it's a
unbelievable in the world of
that said over
he said that take a look at
this is so good the Mishna over there is
discussing the of
so how do you make so one way to do it
is you say that I want this to be
another way to do it a mundish way to do
it is that I want this to be like that
right the whole word which is the way of
referring to an is a kino for the word
carbon what does carbon have to do with
somebody says I don't want any fruit
what does it have to do with a carbon
the ter you say I want the fruit to be
like that thing that's
I want this to be aer as well so the
mishnas and the furs and second parad
talk about different phrases. If
somebody would say this, would it be a
would it not be a right there's a whole
bunch of actually
if you say
right there's a whole bunch of different
says if somebody says I want this to be
like
it's going to be considered a what does
it mean
sheep I want to be like sheep what does
sheep mean says
If somebody says like the sheep with the
you know what that is it's the
it's that
is
that if a is if you have a carbon it's
not there's no so how could it be that
if somebody says I want this to be like
it's
not even there's Call me evil. So said
that from that talked away
that it had a den of regular
and that's this Indian said that I've
always said
that this went with
if that's the case it's
when the were being brought on what was
the
was at the was done by the Frank
if that's the case. So what's going on
here? How comeing
he's saying he says I'm not a says
you're right. I preempted I already made
you a coin. It's because
this one being that went with a miktosh.
So it's for that reason miktosh you have
to have a ken he would have to have a
coin as well. But I just want to say two
before we go there. Number one, this
vert sounds eerily similar to what we
spoke about the other week from the as
it relates to the carbonus of right very
very very similar right
based on the same here in it comes from
we said it's a mural that the
Being that was done in the mik for that
reason the governed it was not the
governs but rather was the governs
saying
remember we mentioned it many times
all was able to prove from all those was
that
was built on the mikdash
I'm going to now take a leap of faith.
If it was onto
as far as I know didn't say it by
this is talking about the by the
screams at you
that's a you have the notion that you
have as it relates to as it relates to
so really the
iser
has to be true by the but
is not necessarily as it relates to
that's the first the second is that the
said this
was asking on the of the wasn't
discussing
he was discussing the Right?
That means that this vert that we're
saying over that it went with is not
just true with regards to the component
meaning
how could I bring the on the I'm not a
that's
right now maybe the minute he knew he
was an at that point he didn't have to
be a but it'sn't just true
That's that's and it's because really
we're coming to that's talking about the
of the and if you see that it's true
even regarding the of the so it's that
it's true not only regarding the
component but it's true with regards to
it's true with regards to the
component as well the truth is I hear
from
and really this
and The kachum of the aada is something
that permeated and underpinned it
underpinned the entirety of the sh of
shabas. I went through the for mayor. I
went through the fordavid
and it's really
different and different based on this
idea
just want to be Messiah with a few
each one is so short. The first one that
is told take
right bring him as a carbon. So the Pik
says that tied up and he brought him on
top of him and he takes out the and he's
about to go ahead and check him and at
the last second
incidentally I saw in the briskish room
they say what's
like why twice because when you want to
stop someone from doing something that
he shouldn't do you say right you scream
it you don't say it once you say it
twice it was at the last second the
knife Mama had his neck
right but the point is the is taking
place where it's happening on on top of
the right
and this is where he's going to go ahead
and and and and do the but the was going
to be on top of the misbeh and in they
asked why did the have to be on top of
the misbeh
had be on top of the that's
will be done on the but why is the being
done on top of the so they say over in
the name of the briskov that the
biscarov said because was an right
should bring them as an isen that was
today's anah has to be in soften now
there was no real right we was soften
the md but the says on
that If
is
on
it's a and the reason is because is
treated it's treated like the
so being that and always requires soften
so it's for that reason it's for that
reason they had to make sure that it was
going to be that's one another I saw in
the brisket they bring from the brisk
that the briskov
So one of the things that tells
is we're going to go
we're going to bow down and after we bow
down we're going to come back what's
see why he wasn't told to bow down like
why is he bowing down he said it's posh
because
and we know the is that any person that
ever left the BT there was a you always
had to bow down. But that's what we talk
about when
because every person that ever left the
Bikto had
was leaving the BT and being that he was
leaving the BTO there was a and because
there was a so it's for that reason he
said
first and after one last they bring in
and that is so the Pik says that are now
walking right they left and Ali
behind and they're walking now
and they're walking now to
do the Pik says that
turns to and he tells him
he said where's the where's the right
when you read the it sounds like at this
point doesn't that he's the one that's
the right so he says I see the I see the
I don't see the sheep where exactly is
this where exactly is this carbon and
they ask two cautious number one so
obviously doesn't have all the
information about what's about to happen
right he assumes though this is going to
be a cell so two cautious number one any
so you could say that according to the
mandama that holds that only allowed to
bring it's good but there is a mandama
that
You can only bring right but
doesn't have to be a first of all it
could be a bucker right it could be a
goat and the frat the frat if you're
dealing with carbonus of the benoyak if
you're dealing carbonus with a benoyak
it could be any kosher animal right
that's the gamaru we spoke so much about
the other day in paratas so they ask in
cheer how did ye know to assume that
there was going to be a
making two big assumptions, right?
You're being very presumptuous over
here. This is the way this carbon is is
going to go down. So they say they say
because they understood that was going
to have to build a misbehav.
The Mishna says
if you have the only way you could be
you have to be a
that's going to be used always had to be
a being that it had to be well
it was a
there must be it must be there's going
to be a cell and if that's the case he
What's going on over here? Oh, but they
say that's only true if you hold this
with some that's following.
But if this is a bomber, there's no
mean that this had to take place in the
Bikto. If it had to take place in the
Bikto, so it's for that reason, it's for
that reason. This was his question
with the assumption that this was going
to be a lust maybe for one and we're
really going to end with this and that
is
in
he asks
and by the way
on this specifically in the brisk so
from Yeshua says over this and does and
because has a lot of fun with this kash.
So this is a kash that comes from the in
the he asked the kash the says
right it was already the the third day
and leaves
and behind and he starts walking
together with he starts walking together
with
so asked that why Didk first ask for
they've been traveling already for 3
days, right? This is going on for 3 days
already. So if it's going on for 3 days,
why did he wait now until day three to
ask this question? Some say I saw that
at this point wasn't sure that he for
sure like he didn't know what was
happening. Maybe is going to be the car.
I he didn't know exactly what was
happening. But now he right it's just me
and my father and I don't think it's me.
So stops getting a little nervous.
you know it was the three of them but
you know now it's it's already only him
but
why did he wait until the third day
right this was his why so said
that till now for sure he was the carbon
he assumed for sure he's the carbon
there's no question about it right but
what happened after leaves the behind so
the
puts it
with a carbon. So with a carbon at this
point said what's going on over here?
It's probably uh it can't be me. If it's
not me, it must be a
he wants to know where the oil is. But
he first on day three. This is what said
in the but I was thinking that last vert
that we said from the from brisk maybe
you could say that until this point
I don't know if he thought he was the
carbon didn't think he was the carbon
this is already something that
right that's already an Indian that
already talk about but in his mind this
was going to be a regular carbon it was
going to be a carbon of bama like any
other car but what happened
On the third day,
they looked up and they saw the mo and
they
and now
we're going there. Now, you know where
this is going to take place? This is
going to take place on this is going to
take place in Mikto. If this is going to
take place in Miktosh, one second. Now
we can't just build him as now you have
to have a until this point I don't know
maybe's going to find the carbon maybe
he's the I don't know it's not the point
but now it was
until this point how's this carving
going to play out is this going to be or
is it going to be the third Hey
all of a sudden the smoke is there now
till now he doesn't know where he's
going. That's the whole point, right?
But now he knows where he's going and
now he sees a smoke. And now he that
it's gonna be
we have to have a I am the carbon. I'm
not the carbon.
Maybe he thought he was the carbon
said he thought he was the carbon.
So now when he saw it on the third day,
it was
But that's why he first asked the kasha
on the third day and we are going to
stop