Zevachim 43

Today's D is and we are at the Mishna two lines from the bottom of Bid's DS being learned as and so the topic of today's is going to be more related to pickle specifically the Tyra says that if Somebody eats from the buser of a carbon that is piggle, he's going to be cars. The Mishna is going to say that it's not only true for the buser of a carbon, but depending on what exactly the was in the event that it was done with a man, it's what's known as the real piggle. Then if you eat part of it, you're going to be stating that not every part of a carbon that's pigled that a person eats from carries with it this very severe punishment of cars. And the Mishna is going to lay out what parts of a carbon are subject to the of the event that one ate from them when they were piggle and what parts of a carbon are not subject to the carus. Now the Mishna is going to give examples of when there is carus when there's not carus. The Mishna is even going to explain a little bit what the two stadium are tal just to precap the Mishna and give away the punchline and that is any part of a carbon that is nether al something else meaning this is a part of a carbon that was asser what does it mean it was oscer needs something else to be moderate then is in the event that the carbon is pickled and one eats from that he's going to be if however you have a aspect of a carbon that is not a it's not something that was user that required something else to be mate rather it's just part of a carbon maybe it's m other things maybe it's not m or it's not a nether the point is in the event that you have a part of a carbon that you can't classify as being even if the carbon is pigle and one eats from it he will not be cars the following are a list of things that even if they are part and parcel of a carbon pigle meaning if one would eat that they would not bears here's the list so if you have a that's pigle and one would eat now from the of that he would not be cars or in the event that the was brought with a machel and one now ate the he wouldn't bear the leav which was part of the if somebody would eat from the of that's he wouldn't be the kayan was the regular ma that the khanim would bring. So in the event that a cayenne brings a even if it's a min or the that's the special that the used to bring every single day known as the those two if one would eat from any component of it is he wouldn't be if somebody eats from the blood of a carbon that's big or if somebody would eat from the of a carbon but specifically that were bond meaning were part of a carbon. Sometimes they were brought together with a carbon. Sometimes they could even be brought. If somebody eats from that brought in all of these cases that not only is one not if he eats from the but even if one would eat from the bun together with the are excluded from the of as it relates to the sheer as part of his complex had to bring a whole bunch of different that were done with this says in the event that the carbon of the was brought with pickle as a result now it's pickle and one would then eat the he wouldn't be says yeah and the reason gives this because the is as we mentioned in the introduction uction to the that really what's going on over here is is it a is it not a becomes the carbon that came along with it. It's a being that it's a it's going to be subject to the says the any part of a carbon that has meaning it has something that's whether it's something that has something that's meaning it's but if you do something else now becomes or it's to be put on but if you do something else it becomes to put on and really this line is the the punchline of the Mishna and then the Mishna gives examples of when you are. Really the first part of the Mishna were examples of then the in the middle told us the rule and then the gives us examples of when you are the dam is the thus the are considered an so here you don't have the but the dam is m and it's misbeh Thus the buster of is also the we know was and the is also considered because the dam of the isim as relates to the and so what are these are the and the was brought on the where the says that on the however the as opposed to it being eaten had to be burnt right not on the not part of the but rather it had to be burnt. So as it relates to the and as a result is considered it sounds a little bit from the Mishna that the buser that is going to be burnt is really not a Remember says any that's not brought on the meaning any whose dam wasn't on the like the and the reason is because the to the pigle is mentioned by the carbon and held it's for that reason that which is the tole was brought and so too you could only that brought on the if you have a carbon that was brought on the such as the last two mentioned in the near just to be clear we saw this already earlier in the holds by the and the carbonas that were brought would render the carbon to be unfit. It would be a plec of carbon but as it relates to the one has for eating from the of that carbon says it has to be and was born and it's for that reason those carbon which were not brought and would not be subject to the of course either way so much happened in this mission a whole sport of carbon there's a lot going on over here there's really a lot to discuss you see rashi is almost a whole here alf this as well. We are going to jump right into the and again just being mindful of the and that is that as much as it's true that if a one of the critical of you have it corresponding avoidance by you have its corresponding avoidance etc etc etc. The is that the carbon would be possible and it would take on this new that if somebody eats from it he would be not always if you eat from a carbon that's big what does it depend on really the cloud was tucked away in the middle of the in between the list of and the list of the said and that's really the rule of thumb if this is a it has a That's mate. So now it's subject to the pigle if not not the and this next is a classic said piggle if would take the of a carbon pickle and he would put it on the pickle would go away from it. Unbelievable. So you have a carbon that was brought with a ple of carbon. If the coin takes the co of that carbon and he puts it on the misbeha said I'll tell you how I know that the hak of uh carbon piggle has the ability to make the carbon pickle then certainly ly it should have the ability to make itself pickle. So it says if you take the of a pickle and you put it on the but the pickle's going to go away. You know I know that because of pickle that goes on the makes the ma pickle. So if it makes the pigle certainly it should make itself pickle. So the gammor says I can't even read the words right what does my mean is trying to prove that if you put the piggle on them and he says a nice like that would seem to prove that that it would be pickle says this is what meant to say if the which is pigle doesn't lose its status of piggle when it goes on pickle. How would it have the ability to go and create that this should be a ma pickle from the fact that the on the has the ability to make the ma into a pigle it has to be a has to be a real how could it be a real if it's pigle or must be what does this mean actually makes a little bit of ankim to try to understand what is saying is what says and that is that we know in order to have a carbon pickle you have to have that all four right there's a whole bunch of ideas that permeate these that all seem to say the same thing which is a problem by the way but there's a bunch of ideas that seem to say the same thing and that is that in order for a carbon to become piggle if it's a carbon a regular animal you have to do aita kabala And if it's a you would have to do a and you'd have to put it into the right you always have to do the which means that in order for a carbon to become pigle you have to take the you have to put it on the and you need that that should be a real it's what refers to as ple on some level it's what does it mean it's clap pickle right it makes the carbon into a carbon pickles to the extent that putting the carbon pickle on the has the ability to be but it has ability to well if that's the case it must be that this is a and it must be also that because to the extent that this is a real nice well then that in of itself would remove the status of pickle again this is something that requires a little bit more there's I'm sitting here on the desk. We're going to get into this a little bit more, but these are the words that says I don't even know what the is because seems to be saying, right, what's the punchline of how he got there? You have is a little tricky, but what's the punch line of? Did he mean to say that if the co would take the kits and he would put it on the misbe what's the is that all of a sudden now he would not be of if he ate from the right that's what it means that there's no if one eats from it that's our talk about that right and that's true even if the didn't go on meaning being that it's a it's not a just based on the rule of our Mishna it's really the first example that the Mishna gave of a of a carbon pickle that's not subject to the we know is never subject to it so if is never subject to it I don't need to tell me that there's not going to be of Maybe was saying it with regards to another meaning he's not saying it with regards to the cars because there's anyways no of maybe he means it with regards to so we know that there are certain times where if somebody would take a carbon that's ple and put it on the is you have to immediately take it off. There's also a concept that you're not supposed to take and put on the but and as a result if you take you put on the is going to be so maybe that's what meant to say the pickle goes away but the says I don't need to tell this to me it's when it discusses examples of it says a carbon that has If the carbon that's what we need anytime you take any of that's possible because of because of so that can't be the maybe what is is the maybe that's what he meant to say what he meant to say was that if you take a pig and you put it on the menu as a result if it goes off the mb you'll have a D to put it back on. But it's not true. The Mishna says regarding that affformentioned list included in which was that even though it's true, but so what's going on over here? What is being it sounds very fancy. It sounds very very intense. What is coming to be? He's coming to tell me that there's no it's coming to be on he's coming to bead. It's not true. Says you have to say what was talking about was where this pickle didn't just go on the but rather what happened was it actually went into the fire and being that it went into the fire. So it could be over there it's going to be more than and near the would be not just but would also be that in other words that thus it's not true is talking about where it didn't just go he's talking about where it It was in the fire. Once it's in the fire, then already could be is not only but the says this is takurishna anywhere. He can't ask but already said it. And the garra says it's a little funny to think that would have to say the same thing twice. What did say this of with regards to those is only true if it didn't go into the fire once the fire has some sort of over it then is already so why would have to tell me the same twice says is telling me the same twice you want to know why he had to say it meaning he said it like and here he's saying regarding the I'll tell you why cuz I could have thought when is it true that is that if it's only an the meaning what would be if you took of the carbon and it was but not the whole carbon so let's say you took an a part of it is in the fire the other part is not in the fire so it could be over there the is that the that was if now it was going to And even that was and the reason is because it's all one as it relates to the miffris is flower right so if one part of the flower touches the fire and the other part doesn't the part that didn't was not to the part that did and I would think that what I would think that there should be no even though of that was that what does it mean that it's what it means is that when it's didn't say it already once the answer is yes but wants you to know it's true even for the why would you think the is different because the you would think maybe as individual parts from's original statement I would know that the that but was that you would think maybe you don't have wants you to know that you look at the as one unit you look at it as one and therefore if part of it touches the all of it is going to be as if it touched the all of it is going to have a for it to go on said it's for that reason meaning based on the way we just explained pickle if you would have the of a carbon pickle the part of it is sitting on the or and the other half was on the it was on the top of the and it actually went into the fire you'd be able to take even the that's on the floor and put it on the this sounds like a huge I mean there's part of it that's not even on the it's on the floor but says at the end of the day if we say that we look at the whole as being one unit I don't think it makes a difference if the part the part that wasn't is within a sheer love of the fire or if it's sitting on the floor who cares at the end of the day to the extent that we view it as one to the extent that we view it as one unit. So it's one and the same and if that's the case just like said his with regards to where the other part of it is on the not in the says the same would be true if it's on the floor. Either way, we're going to now move to the next part of the we're going to get back to this, but what's the very very short recap? How does he know? He knows it from because the going on the is considered piggle could only become bigle if you have a and this of pigle going on the you see creates the sauce. creates. If that's the case, it's what that you wouldn't be if you eat it. If you eat it, it's anyway. So many and this is included in it. It's not would be if it was going to be and even though he said this once already, he wanted you to hear it. He wants you to know it here in this as well that the is considered one unit and even only went ahead and touched it really it's going to be for everything as well. What emerges just is that this idea of is talking about not when it was simply right's words areas it's not enough that it went on it has to be so it's really that's when you have this of and then of is going to be again. I'm going to get back to this at the end of the that's either way. Moving along in the name. If somebody has a carbon that's pigle a carbon that's noiser or and he put it on the putting it on the removes the said means right what kind of business is that you take something that's possible you put it on the and then all of a sudden it becomes what the mikvah had become a mikvah said it means when it went into the fire. Once it goes into the fire, then it's already different. What changes when it goes into the fire? It's right. The or the fire of the is by the way, fire is a right. Anything that's used with fire, the way you do the is by putting it into fire, right? So fire actually is a fire. I would say what is fire a yeah right yeah it's actually a better than but the bottom line is this of in the name of is really with the of says asked on this kasha was from an excerpt of a bry we're going to see the full bryer by the soon but for now it's just the excerpt of a that's discussing somebody that is where the is that he's not allowed to eat in fact if he eats kachchen he's going to be now we spoke about this in one of the previous where the had a so we know that this mikt and this kalumas is really made up of two components it's made up of someone that's the is not eat kach. There's also an idea that if someone's he's not let that's but there's a huge meaning between those two ideas. If someone is and he eats so that's the comes along with etc. If somebody's and he eats, that's then it's the says you're not allowed to do it. But at the same time, he's not going to be this is an excerpt. In fact, it's one of four sheetas in a bracer that discusses how we know that the tumas that carries with it is talking about with the kachar and the kades that's is talking about where the person is but he's eating that is meaning as much as we take for granted that that's the way it is but the bryer was Not so sure and in fact there's four sheetas in the B. So how you know that's the case? Now the relevant PK for this excerpt of the BR is you see where the ambiguity is because an improper pronoun right of who is it on the person or is it on if but maybe it's so it's not 100% clear. So again, that's the background of the price and that's where comes in says it says and we learn from there. It sounds like we're talking about a situation whereas like it just so happens that right now the is there but maybe the can go away must be that it's not because there's no way of making the tum go away. Right? The tum on a person could go away. how you go to the mikvah. If however the buser is telling me there's no way to make that go away sounds like it's fleeting and as a result says I think just the seems to suggest that we're talking about where it's a what was if you're going to tell me that there's an idea that if you take that's tom and you put it on the fire of the msbak what happens to mus Right. Well, if that's the case, it's the same idea of as it relates to the said that the of sounds like not only could the tum go away, it can go away. A person goes into the mikvah, becomes tar. You take bus, you put in the mikvah, it doesn't become tar, but says medi mikvah. Don't say the word mikvah anywhere. Where does the suggest that it has to be a situation where not only is it temporarily but the way it would be removed is now I'll tell you what the is the is because what type of carbon is this talking about we're talking about you're talking about you ate of has no den to be burnt on the it has no den to be And being that it's so if it's not so therefore the can't be the it's true there is a carbon that you could say is that it's fleeting right but it's not true for and being that we're handling it must be the is referring to the it's not referring to the ra different sounds like the word sounds like that it's going to be intact. It's going to remain the way it is. Which is as much as it's true that could be, but when's it going to be? When you burn it. What happens when you burn it? It's going to start breaking into pieces. So, it's not going to be all and being that it's not going to be all of that's how we knew that the must be going in this case. Either way, and the Gumar is going to do now what it feels like it's been doing a lot lately. And that is we mentioned an excerpt of a bryer an excerpt of a longer. So let's bring it up. Let's now discuss the entire bry again. What's the background to this? The says means on the person or means on the boss. If you eat if you eat when the kachum itself is everybody knows that when you eat it. The question is where exactly do you see it in the it would seem to be not so clear says the it says in the means you think it's maybe right and you know what all of is or is it on the it says regarding this parish of the word and it says That's regarding or the word of just like it relates to and the says what does it mean? It means not when the mikdash is. It means if the person's tongue and he enters the mdash it's so over here where it says what it means is says I have a different it says the word and it says that's means this line of requires is going to explain it rebi says it says the word is going to explain this that sounds like it's and it remains intact. It's by the right that's that we just went through. Either way, we had one sliver of this which was we brought it for a reason because from the of the day and that is but once we mention that one of the we mentioned the entire B and we saw it's four and now the Gar is going to go to work said it says says and the word is mash that we're talking about says where do you see that from the word it means right what were words were doesn't say anything any that wasn't explained by and any that wasn't explained by explained meaning there was a that explained and he explained it so not shy that if you didn't explain a p like he explained that I imish didn't explain the and there was a that's explained and it was so not shy that if you didn't explain a ways explained the explained in other words this is Just a dramatic way of saying once said so first and then believe it or not we're going to digress from our digression and the is going to bring what the is who was once so says I'll tell you what said what he said was being that the starts and it ends and there's a middle that's how you know that the is talking about so after explain this we have no idea what he even means so Rashi explains what's going on over here what's going on over is like this that really rebi said the past in the pik should that the PK's talking about that should be the and the reason is because if you just look at the context of the PK that's what it sounds like the problem of why the were unsure and the reason they're entertaining it of referring to the baser is because if you look at the PK the PK starts Basha ends Balasha and in the middle it says the let's see It sounds like the is right. It's not an it's like it's an it ends. That's straight up. Right now, right? So the in this is clear. It started in a cave end. If that's the case, when it says, it sounds like it's because if it was referring to the or the it would have said, right? It says Allah love. So that's really what was throwing the for a loop said. But look at the next. The next says as follows. That is not ambiguous. There's no part of that when you're not sure. Is it referring to the person? Is it referring to the boss? Everything is straightforward. Yet that PK also starts ends and we inject in the middle. Again, right? That's a that's so rebi said that from the word I know that because the really is it should be that's the kite in if you look at the that's probably the way they would be in depos I didn't look but probably that's what reby's saying anyways right What was throwing for a loop was how do you go from from oh must be that is not referring to the must be it's referring to the as much as that's true look at the next the next there's no ambiguity and you see it goes that's the sometimes the p will do that it's the next p SO IN THIS PAR go you see for sure the terra is doing that so if the ter is doing it in that It's you're talking about the terrorist knowing it and this Pik as well either way says this was his very in cryptic sentence that Rabbi said either way. So we mentioned that once said and in the same vein theor says robi but we know it's zeri throughout. So in the same vein, Zeri or maybe Rav Zeri did the same exact thing as it relates to Bryce. So again, we're digressing now from our digression because the is going to bring Zeri. So why we digressing from a digression? Because the sug is a pickle right and asked the kasha from a what did the bryer talk about the idea that if someone's There was one line in that was very hard to understand. We needed to say the was so dispelled with his that said any that wasn't explained like this is and oh by the way there's a price that we once also didn't understand any wasn't explained like explained that price is on that same level it's so now we're going to mention so this is I think a digression from a digression already from a digression regards what is this price and this is a fun All right. So what's the background over here? So it actually says the background is this price is a kayim and this kayan is discussing the of somebody who is and he eats. Okay. So it's really in the same as specifically specifically it's discussing two one is the says that if somebody's and he eats not the real doesn't need but he eats my if someone's and he eats Now we know if he eats but this Bryson is discussing not the not the part of the comes with that's discussed in the first 15 or so he's talking about where someone was tell if he ate the and again is if he eats if he eats he's now the says in memory If in these paras the said what does mean that's where the is going to come in says the bra had it said I would have thought as relates to the but as relates to that's why I had to say so you should know there's no and it would have said I would have thought but it doesn't say anything about maybe when it comes to the going to be that's why it says this is again a very cryptic price that's going to open itself up to some here again it says and it says I need I need I'll tell you what had it I would have thought is but is miss all there is is when it comes to and it said I would have thought maybe there's no at all when it comes to so says let's try to give us some definitions here what's the t of the word what's the t of the word maybe means why is mer because there's only malus why is true because then there's already but says the if that's the case what's the brighter say now why did it have to say micer and truma because had it said micer and not truma right let's see if we could do this by ourselves I would have thought that for me there's but for truma there's mis that's why the said truma to know that all there is is alive and had it said truma and not messer I would have thought that for truma there's mis but for meer there's nothing that's why I need and that's why I need it says if this what means the first part of the has absolutely zero havana why because you're going to tell me that again my kis You're telling me that the reason it had to say and I can't learn truma from because I would have thought that truma is yeah you got it right it actually is bisa how could I have thought that if by there's malus then by truma if it doesn't say anywhere in the tyra And the home is to learn it from well there's no way that it could be. There is no way that means micer and even though there is a parish of that would represent itself well as but it can't be that's what the B is talking about because that first part of the B that makes no sense number one because that's the masc sounds like by saying now I know it's not it is besides how would I ever know that it's from Allah says maybe something else maybe means and means to me okay so what does this mean so again if you go back to the par of someone that's to eats my or someone that's Tommy and he eats chum the Tyra says it doesn't matter if this person became tom by coming in contact with a sher or if this person became by coming in contact with a mace in either case the is that if he ate my sashain he's going to get malcus And if he ate truma he's now you could hear that the two of how this person became tomas and m respectively would be treated as kalos and because we know in the world of ao as opposed to m which is so maybe what the means to say is if it says why does it have to say and again what be the had it said would have thought that there's by ostensibly by right but to know that it's only and if it would have said only I would have said to right that would be the how you learn this price in this way but the says how you going to make this work meaning are we talking about this price if is so then I don't know if the price is talking about is talking about if talking about both but if is really shar so what then is the price talking about is this happening in the world of micer or it's happening in the world of let's try both is this going on in the world of how do you start the I would have thought it's not true what does the say regarding it says right the doesn't distinguish between the between so what do you mean it's not true and more so that's why The saiduras by Truma to tell me that it's beloved right the punch line. So it can't be if that that's what's going on over here that means okay so let's try the next case maybe it's talking about that's what's going on over here. Well then so what's the B is saying? Had it said meaning had it said that if someone's and he eats my then he gets a lot BUT MAYBE IF HE'S AND HE eats then he's going to get miso. How would you know that the would be you would know from so says I have no idea how you supposed to give over here with this if means I don't understand it and if it means and m whether you say that it's betrum or whether you say it's I don't understand it. This is where the came to the rescue said. You want to know what ko means? It means to you want to know what means means to okay we had a problem with that. We said if you go the truma route it's not going to work and if you go the masheni route it's not going to work. So what's the karma? This is what's going on over here. said if the Torah would have only talked about meaning it would have said that if someone's taught me to share and eats he gets and if somebody's taught me to share and he eats he gets meas and I wouldn't have said a word about I would have thought that I would have thought that If somebody eats the which is he gets malus and you see if somebody eats the which is truma with the misa he gets misa right if it says tum share it only and it says it by my says it by truma so what's the masa you're going to reach that if I have a tumacala and you go ahead with that tummakala and you eat the you're going to get malus. If you have a and you eat the what are you going to get? You're going to get mis. This is punch line. Here's the but to say that just like if somebody has a and he does he eats if somebody would have a such as Tomas and he would do an such as the mis says well that's why the had to speak out to teach me that Just like if someone has the tumalo and he does the he has which is the tumali he does the which is nice all he gets is malus so too if he has the which is and he eats the he's going to get only malus why is it a kadesh because if somebody has the heamur someone is someone is and he eats trum he gets miso so you would think that if there's one sad kamura tumo So maybe that's the that's not what is going to be the case. Again, let's revisit the BRA for one last time just to appreciate a little bit the historical meaning. Why does the have to mention Tomas and also Tomas in the parish of aaser and in the parish of cuz had it said only regarding right regarding I would have thought in the event that somebody eats my sheni with a tumalo then you get a laugh if somebody would eat my he would eat it with Tomas. you would be that's what the says no if you eaten even with the you're not going to be or you be what was the cash the WAS WHERE WOULD YOU COME UP WITH SUCH an if the says that you eat how could you come up with an that if you eat it with what was the ter is I actually have a rale I have a good because I seem to flourish in the that if I would eat so to say that's the I would have had that's the what's the only said that if you eat but it would have said that for I would have thought for the be that's why the additionally we're talking about the love is exhale. So as it relates to raid going back to the first part of today's draf and that is mela said algabo and was likear didn't understand what that even means and the gar tweaked from the fact that the of a pigle has the ability to be it has the ability to be must be it's a and if it's a pa was shakar a little bit in terms of what the is and even what the mitas is and what came out was talking about not when the pig was held But whereas and is that although ordinarily anytime you have pickle that goes on but that once it's already then the is not only is it but at this point it's going to be as well as didn't say this already once said once it's already at that point is it's going to be ready said yeah did already say it once that's 100% true but at the same time there's a as it relates to the because you could have thought that all the different components of the are viewed as individual inim and being that they're viewed as individual so you could have thought that maybe you only have the that actually touched him as that went into the fire but as it relates to the that didn't touch. So maybe over there it's going to be different. And that's the that wanted you to know that this is true even as it relates to this is true even as it relates to the covenants in in this is in has a very intense on this of just to be knocked and that is said that there's another sugn over there says this is a well-known Mishna even though it's a real but it comes up a lot it's possible for a person to eat one yet you're gonna be four and one so you ate one and from that one kazay that the person ate He's going to end up having to bring four and even going to have to bring. What's the mist? The somebody was and he ate and it was also which means it was hackish and on top of that you ate it on kipper. So again there was a person that was he ate the of a carbon that was noiser on this person has to bring a times four. He has to bring an asham as well. What's the of bringing four? Number one, he ate you at eat. He ateer says no. He ate on if you and he was that ate. If you tell me you're going to be Why does he have to bring asham because he was milish and because he was act so you have to bring a carbon fashion is trying to come up with this case. Why couldn't the time of the mission come up with where you would be? What would be the case? the let's make an it's talking about with a person ate a kaz of pigle meaning let's be it was also pickle and if it was also pickle if you eat and if that's the case I have five so says it doesn't work like this is talking about where the person ate from and if it's onehe You can't have one that's going to be around pickle. Either it's nice or it's but it can't be both. Why not have maybe the case is talking about where the carbon was pickle and then you took of the carbon piggle and you when you the piggle went away. state that if you take pickle you put on now once the pickle goes away so now if you leave it around too long now it's to become nicer so when the says it doesn't mean only that it's from the same carbon, but it means also it's the same a and it's impossible to have one a that's going to be pigle and one a that's going to be noiser and it's for that reason you had to mention one of the two the picked nicer could have picked pigle I guess but I picked nicer but the bottom line is that and it's for that reason it's impossible to have one a that would be nicer pickle that of is true not only with regards to the of and that is but it's also true with regards to the that is of goes away for a minute anyways has no you see even from that of the that would remove the it didn't work in of because that anyways has no and if that's the case must be coming to tell me something else but the bottom line is you saw it already in the that and that is that is true also with regards to removing the pickle in In other words, there's two applications in shas where you find this den of pakabulu. One place where you find the concept of pakabulu is with regards to yu. Another place that you find is with regards to removing the issam in this is emperic giml. It's says the Any soul that's quote unquote whatever that means the says the is there's certain that any if it goes on and is and says This is the we really need the next what would be if this apostle didn't just go on but rather it went into the fire was even if it went down you can put it back up and you can go with the what's the even though It's true when it comes to carbon that has really but there's an idea of now is going to be this is empiric. If you take you put it on the once the fire of the consumes the majority of the pigle at that point the is going to go away. What's the mart to that? It's it's the same idea that once it's at that point it's it's and we even said that it's not only true for it's true for Tommy as well and that's that the idea is that if you take and you put it on the and it's at that point it's going to be in other words as it relates of which is and as it relates to the iss being removed the of which is if you look at the ra seems to contradict himself very subtle but very profound why because when the ra brings the ra's is as long as it was at that point in the brings the his one it's which happens once it's sounds like that in the is that it was not yet in the of is that has to be at first glance it's just two applications of the same if the of is then the should have been consistent and if it means okay so then should have said it in both cases seems to suggest as long as it's and as it relates to the idea of the iss going away it sounds like it has to Emma says that brings it to me already was on this and he says says if this which is mentioned right here in is mentioned a little more on if you look at that. So over there says the same exact and that is that if you have a pigle so is that it's and it's over there that the reason it's is because that says what's this idea idea of just explain this a little bit better. There's an idea that you find in where you take something that really has no mock to go on and it's makes it and now that it becomes so now it's allowed to stay on the so what's the he said I get two one said is that means that any soul any issue that This this carbon head once it's and it becomes that goes away meaning that whatever was there is gone and as a result now there's a that you're allowed to keep it on the mean that's the punchline of says doesn't mean that whatever issue was there goes away but rather means you have all the issues you have all the problems OPPOSITE OF NOW YOU'RE AND once you're at this point now there's a new with all your problems with all your issues with all your baggage there's a that's called says have two to the second the first is whether if somebody would take of a carbon and you would put it on the fire of the whether there would be a because of says in the regular that you have with a carbon there's no place to ever be m there's no place to ever be m there right yet if that is touched the fire now all of a sudden says if the of is a new al it's a new so you'll tell me that this terrace includes in it even the regular doesn't but this maybe would but if you're going to tell me the whole gather of is that it removes any problems all it does is it reinstates its kosher status the way the carbon was well never had a never had a how's all of a sudden giving it a m is true forb. Now what's nishb means where the cen didn't do a a proper first the nishbah and then you put it into the so is that the carbon ple however if would go into now what's the so that's really another right but without getting involved in that that's the includes in it that it's missing you can't do a you can't do with D that was has to have a proper in order for you to be able to go ahead now and do a so he's embarrassed even on aim that never had a so if the is that it removes the soul that's here so that's very good if you have that's possibility to make it go away now that it makes it go So now you'll be able to have A TERRORIST BUT OVER HERE THE PROBLEM is don't HAVE to the it's mu from here it's from here said that what it's together that together is that you don't meet the criteria for what you would need in order to be able to twerk but at the same time this is a Yeah, you need you have to be you can't be but we're not handling we're handling a whole you have to it's a paradigm shift so a whole new THIS doesn't this can be a double THIS but the point is from the fact that you see as it relates to and you find the concept of as it relates to as it relates to even a carbon that's ple that's missing as such as where it's from there that the of isoid of is that it's new well if that's the case if that's the case I don't understand that right? What's the is it goes on the fire of the way the explained now all of a sudden the pickle goes away. Why did need that? It's paigula you'd say needed. So there should be a dim now of because if it's piv how you putting it back ON THE BUT SAID THAT'S clear of and that's clear that the of is that it's where do you see that it's said from the fact that it includes from the fact that includes that means there's a new par that happens when when it's as soon as it's it's now there's a new so So why do I need why did say I don't need a menu? It could be all day EVERY DAY. IT'S NOT AND WHAT IT'S not at that point. It's going to have a no and there's no where you find the also shouldn't. So why do I need just say a little over there? It's says that Because if it's a pickle, it's like eating. So you have to come on to a needs because that's once it's art. You find throughout there's an idea of and that works with the baggage with all the so for that there's no reason it shouldn't be able to for SOMETHING THAT'S POSSIBLE WITHOUT THE concept of and if that's the case why is mera of once it's predicated on it should not be that was said a little bit of a hard vart to explain this and that is said that that's the and the fact that once It doesn't require. Okay. And why did say because the only time the only time it's that if something goes under and it's that it's going to be considered is if it didn't touch the fire. It has to go on the fire. It has to go on the fire. But if it touched the fire, oops, I I burnt myself. Right. If that's what happened, that wouldn't make it. So said that once the becomes at that point there could be a on the even if it has its status of pigle where's getting into the weeds and where is to engul is because understood that the only way it could become in the first place is if it was And that already requires that already requires that on some level it should be a proper. So came to and said that if somebody would take a piggle and he would put it on the fire of the it would be but he said one second you're putting piggle in the fire and it's becoming no way. It's so and so from and from that there's no way in the world that that would be able to be new of that would say go ahead and be despite the fact that it's possible. It's for that reason that said that the is that when you put the it's and being that it's when it's considered when it's considered a considered it's a therefore now it's a regular now ready you're going to you're going to be subject to this new said how do I know right how do I know that if the is said I'll prove it to you because you need that in order to CREATE THE PICKLE SO IT'S it's considered a that can create and once it creates at that point you're going to be okay in In other words, the reason needs in the is their imish needs it. If you don't have so you have nothing. He's trying to say that when you take the or any of you put on the now all of a sudden the pickle's going to go away. The noise is going to go away. The tum is going to go away. Where you see that is if the pickle goes away so now all of a sudden you're going to be okay. where needs the is not to say that there's a he doesn't need it yo could be even with piggle you don't need here's the punch line you don't need to have au because the yalo is based on that is not governed by And if you find it with regards to regarding with there's no reason it shouldn't be true where then does need the fact that it's he needs it for it to become once it's needed it to become because the way it becomes is when it's and the has to be a And for that you would need that it should be paig because if it's in a state of pigle that would be a problematic that being that you find that that octur is if you find that it's then it means it's a regular if it's a regulator so now this octur is going to be able to work for this as well says You can explain the very beautifully. I'll read this paragraph inside. All you need is but as relates that it right is when it happens a little bit or is when it happens most of it. You know why? Because at the end of the day because the fact that it's saying is not what's that as it relates to that's going to be enough. But as it relates to the for that you have to be what do you mean said that it's only when it's hold only happens when it's at least we just explained it directly that's only with regards to so that it should be considered are so that it should become but once it's that this is a each one gets its own at the end of the day the end of the day the whole reason why said is not because he needs the pickle to go away he doesn't need the pickle to go away. He just needs that the pickle would go away. And being that the pickle would go away, that's just a sim, right? It's not a C, but it's a sim. It's a sim that it's a regular it's a regular. If it's a regular consider even a little bit, this is also going to be again's point is there's no direct link between The only reason is connecting them is because at the end of the day they're tied by the time speaks this out clearly earlier in the it's just because at the end of the day if we view this as a then it's going to be and if we view this as a well then it's going to be a that makes it a so then now you can go ahead and have but you don't need the puck in order to have the all you need is the which would also make it aime but is that there's a so at the end of the day for that you need to have a what's the definition of a that's always what it is the is what do you mean you're handling pickle over here how's this a no that's we know for sure that when you put pickle on them It is a it's so it's considered it's considered then it's also going to be able to become as it relates to you need the meaning that you need the raost the only time it's ever going to be is if you're going to remove it 100% or that's why the rakoy so again at the end of the day what is saying is is that in as much as said you don't need the in order to have the when increases your says that regarding the regarding the yeah there you need the you have to remove the in order for you not to be but you don't need the reason is being this how why don't you need it because once it's and it works with all the baggage with all the you're going to have it why then does say because needs needs the s of why it's BECAUSE IT'S THAT PART OF THE equation needs for this as well needs the fact that this is The fact that it's a marata rather beget that's the but he doesn't need the doesn't need the punchline he needs what got him to what got him to is the fact that it's and that he needs for this but at the end of the day in all he needs is that it was for that any little is going to be enough. He needs that the pickle should be removed. In order for the pickle to be removed, you have to remove you just have to touch the fire. You need the whole thing to be removed. What's in the talking about the definition of talking about the definition of didn't seem to say that? Yeah, it seemed to say that said it's really not. They're not. It's in the sense that they're bound by the hip. And that's why when makes you end up with if putting the is a is a is a well then it's a which is going to be and it's also going to remove the it's two things that are going to happen. But at the end of the day, it's going to become when it's only that's and it's going to remove the piggle when it's already the one thing that comes out of this is that just notice it became before it was right because what emerges just from the album that's once it was you tell me it's not but it's not until it's That never bothered me. Forget that's what we want. That doesn't bother me because of that could be all day. That was never an issue. Why? It sounded like you needed in order to be in order to sh this. But the fact what comes out is is that it's already before it was that's beautiful. That's part of why this is because that's the way it SHOULD BE BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT'S from that you could become even even when you're in a state of it being possible. Either way, this is just to bring out one point. Again, we're stopping here, but just to bring out one point, you know, the ninth parac that's the where the are discussed, right? Something that underpins the entirety of of if you look at the first right the begins. What does it mean? from ages that the learned of this rash. What's Rashi saying? Rashi is saying that the leoty so that later it should be able to become the way the R said it it has a to now make it. In other words gave us a gift and love this and that is the idea of is when you think of the of a carbon. So you think of to go ahead and be of a carbon was that there's two daon there's the carbon and then there's the of a carbon that is non-discriminatory right it could be even aish right it could be a pigle it could be that it doesn't to the regular of what's the gh of that it's what's referred to in as how does it happen once it's once at that point it becomes so the said what is saying right in the beginning of what does it mean if you take a ple you put it on you go on the fire it's not you just touch the it gives it a what's the get what's the it gets a to be which usually is it happened ALREADY means it gives it a now TO HAVE A NEW WHAT'S the it's not because it's first going to become when it's but it has a this is 101 as relates it flows from this now again this is the that we walk away from the what's the but the of the is that's the you want the that's the is that is not that removes all the issues together is it has you have issues but I'm coming anyways right there it's still a to put me on the with all my imperfections I still have a mus of becoming now I much if that's the case Why didn't you pull? That's with but the bottom line is the is that there's a new brisk called and with that from that even the whole of it gives it a so that now you actually have a usually you don't have once is madesh now all of a sudden it gets that den