Zevachim 36

Today's is and we are 12 lines from the bottom of the two dots. Today's being learned as we learned in a over there where is there says as it relates to moment holds that it is going to be cautioned. Now the Mishna in Hamzbadesh is discussing the predominant of peric madesh and that is the idea that there are times that if a do ple goes on the misbu so that it's possible where you could have dam that's pleim that are where really they have no business being on the m and have no capacity to and in the event that they are on the stating that there's a concept of sometimes we don't take them off we leave them there and in base brisk it doesn't just mean once it's there leave it there it means there's a forle a little different than the traditional it's what's known as thear but either way the mish there is discussing which is and which is and the truth is in kachum very often you find that the measuring stick to know how ple something is one of the themes of the beginning of sed kachum is that not all were created equally all the limudim and the piras really shout that idea but one of the measuring sticks that are used to determine how poss Something is is this something that's means that it's not that ple because even though yeah it's ple but it's to that type of we are something is that means it's so distant from the law of that even if it touched even if it was put but you have to get rid of it you don't even have a of so the mishna There is discussing what type of is what type of is the mentioned the of and included in is that a carbon that has a bal the is that is something that's so puzzle that even if it goes on the you have to take it off says commenting on what says I agree with everything that you said with the exception of balaka was of moment said that if you take a carbon that's mo and you put it on the is going to be says who was a so he said in the name of his great the only time said that when it comes to a that's if the was in the literally in the cataract of the eye the point is it's not true for all mment it's true for What's unique about because the is that an is not subject to the of the saysamos. So in as much as kachum 101 is that an animal can't be a but it's true if it's an animal if it's an o if it's a bird then you don't have that stating that as much as an doesn't have the regular of but that's a it's missing an entire limb then the is not let it on the in the world of lust there's a is the in that it's a more severe and that type of or is that really an is not subject to the but there's a that's called is it a and that type of even or is it a but either way the is that there are certain moment that would make an apostle and there are certain moment that would not make an apostle. So said in the name of the great that this said when it comes to that's only true if it's a that's such as a that's a without a question and a behemoth that has such a condition you would never allow to put on the but it's because it's not that has a sad cast albeit when it comes to a knife there we're lenient Even when it comes to the additionally the only time when it comes to is if first the animal was hacked and afterwards it developed the if however the animal had the first and then it became hctish later and the reason is because if somebody's it doesn't have the ability to ever become so So we know that all hectish could be divided into two groups. It could be divided into and it could also be divided into right depending on what you're learning that would determine how you may want to slice and dice all the different types and subcategories of but in order for an animal to be able to go on in order for it to be shinar even in it has to have the requisite which means not only is it holy but it's it's not just that it's value It's it's an animal that was kadesh and developed the maintains its anes being that it's sort of dead on arrival this so it's for that reason even though it becomes it becomes it doesn't become so that in as much as said when it comes to m but it's only if it was but if the was there first and the came second then it never There's no way in the world is going to be additionally if somebody is an female animal that the is because that's similar to an animal that has a where the came before the soil. always had to be a right. There are certain rules and regulations when it comes to what gender a carbon had to be an always had to be a with very very few exceptions always had to be able to be a or a right depends on what carbon you're bringing that determines what type of animal it had to be. If somebody would go and would be mish in a cave. So that's a dead on arrival digger type of problem because the minute you tried giving it to it was already initial because has to be it was not allowed to be in a cable. sounds like from the wouldn't even be stating that it's not so positive that it's not but it's a for sure and said the name and that too would be a situation would be that in the event that it went under you're going to have to remove it's like said that is included in stating that number one it's only true if it's or something similar to it's that is going to be number two it also has to be a situation where the hect came first and the came second and by the way as a derivative of point number two would also hold that if someone was as it and the would be so it's on that Last note that the Gar now is going to ask Aasha Rabzer asked Aasha from the Bria that the Gumar brought earlier on the Mishnad said that in the event that you have an animal and this animal had a schl this animal had a like a fetus and somebody now takes from that fetus and is mil. So putter you're going to be putter. Now the assumption is that means somebody took from the buser of the so took from the buser of this fetus was mil the is that it's not considered and the reason it's not considered is because we don't look at the as being part of the and as a result he didn't bring a says there's a very obvious here let's say you would take the buser not from the you would take the buser from the mother it sounds like for sure you would meaning the schl is not considered part of the as a result it's not subject to the but if you would take the mother itself it certainly would be subject to the of now let's just think about the case for a second we're talking about a situation where you're taking the boser of an animal you're being and we're saying that you're going to be for okay we also know that this animal's in a cave how do you know the animal's in the cave has fetus. So by definition it's a ka. Now if you do a little bit of back of the envelope arithmetic this case is almost then on arrival. It almost can't happen. You know why? Because when is there an to take the the of a carbon only by because the whole is comes from the fact that you're supposed to bring it in the you're supposed to bring it in the and if you went ahead and you brought up that was supposed to be eaten if you decided to grill on your barbecue as long as it's in that would be fine right that wouldn't be a problem of that's something that would be go ahead and do Right? That's why you're supposed to eat it. But the point is that we're dealing with an the problem is if we're dealing with an then how does it have a baby and by definition has to be a right says the let's see it inside. So what is the animal of this? It has to be right that's obviously what it is. Has to be has to be in a cave. Has to be because we're ding regarding the boss. Has to be ina because it has a baby. So says, "How could you have an says I'll tell you when it comes to an even though but holds when it comes to right and if you'll tell me that holds that even despite the fact that it was then I could explain the cuz I could say I could say that this price is going to okay and being that according to if you would take this and you would put it on the would be that means it's so I understand how it could be now to the of but if you can tell me I'm also terri even going to but he holds that it's only if it's called as and as a result command. Well, if that's the case, then who's the T of this B? Bryce doesn't make any sense. Who holds au right again? who holds a mal when it comes to it's tells this is a very very how are you going to explain this says the you can explain this you can explain it by doing a little bit of surgery you know what you have to say the said that if somebody would take from Baser of the Shilia and would go now and be at so the is that you would be potter. What's the dick? It sounds like if you take from the bosser of the mother you would be you would be it's not the right. You know what the is not meaning if you would take from the mother. If you take from the imm of the mother, you would be there's a dick to be had. But the dick is that if you take from the mother, not any piece of from the mother, the imm of the mother. Oh, you took from the imm of the mother. You would be what's the punch line. You don't have to say that the bride is talking about you could say it's talking about you could say it's talking about and if that's the case there's no at all. You don't have to come on to you don't have to come out. It's not gonna be a cash. But the gim says that I hear what you're saying, but it's very very dark. You know why? Because when the bra said that if you take from the fetus, you're gonna be there. It doesn't say from the imum of the fetus. It said if you tooken and the is mean if you take from hen, right? Which means the bosser. It doesn't say, it says the bosser. It's but if you take from the bosser of the mother it sounds like you would be if that's the case must be it is an it's an invest We're not talking about an we're talking about this has nothing to do with moving along as what would be if someone did a cotchum of course and he did it with the to leave the blood around until tomorrow or the imm around until tomorrow or he had in mind not to just leave the until tomorrow but to take the and to bring it meaning outside the aaruda place says this is a say that it is going to be now this rahuda that we just mentioned didn't explain yet is a very famous rabhuda in the sugis that we're learning right Now it's known as that if someone has a it's going to be a so let's explain this a little bit. One of the carbon is ava's piggle. Piggle loosely translated comes in two forms meaning is doing or even if it's and has a mind to eat or to be or to do this or even so let's just pick one case. So the does the and he has a mind that he's going to be. So this man is to do it today and tonight he's going to be tomorrow to do it is in the mdash and he's going to do it outside of the mdash. He's going to do it somewhere. That's what's known as a piggle. If it's if it's poss but the point is that is the that's going to pass and says you don't have to think so far in order for it to be as long as the would have in mind not even to be not even to be just to leave it around meaning you have to be at just to be mighty at that in of itself would be enough for and it's true for the it's true for the says that in of itself should be a problem. Now the Gmorra is going to have a whole lot of resour but let's just give it away a little bit and that is that rahuda holds being that in the event that the dam was left over until tomorrow the dam would be posal or if the dam was taken outside of the azor it would be poss if the was left until tomorrow it would be posser if it was taken out of the azor it would be possible you say having to make the carbon ple is in it of itself a you don't have to have the fancy of actually being that I had a to put a critical part of the carbon in a situation where the carbon now would become that creates a reality we'll see the gar is going to say well the speak out right that's how this works and the itself of doing something like that makes the carbon a ready puzzle. It's only had a mind to do that's going to be a problem. But just he knew to just leave it around even though if I left it around it would be a problem. Okay. What does that have to do with having just because I had that in of itself doesn't necessarily mean anything. The mish continues and says what would be if the was done with the intention to do this on the ramp. So with all the different of there's never a carbon where the mitzvah is take the dam and spritz it on the rampid or it was done with to do this on the side of the m that didn't have a underneath it or the had a mind to do a carbon that's supposed to go or a carbon that's supposed to go Or he was bringing a carbon with his supposed to be on the he had a mind to do this or vice versa. Or in the event that would have in mind that the buser should be eaten right everything is going to be fine but it should be eaten by a Tommy is not allowed to eat or should be done by Tommy Tommy is not allowed to do the or not rather or let's say he was bringing the carbon that he's going to break the bones of the carbon everybody knows this decided he has a he is going to Make sure he breaks every bone of this carbon bas or to eat it. We used to touch it, right? to eat it half roasted where he had in mind to take the dam of his carbon and to mix and to make a with so in all these cases it's going to be even holds this is going to be and the concludes does not by the way highlight that line the only time is if it was if it was What about but as it relates to being it would only be true. Now that last line, I saw in the brisk they struggle very much because it sounds like that line is coming to explain everything that we saw in the Mishna and almost everything that we saw in the Mishna was right. The Mishna introduced the of who holds that having a to put the carbon in some compromised state where it's going to be possible that in of itself creates a reality the carbon now becomes possible. Then the Mishna gave 10 to 15 examples where you would have thought that should be in effect and it's not. And then explain those lines are true according to it doesn't have to be it doesn't have to be and it doesn't have to be even is going to be possible in the applied but I saw some say that it could be that line is true as well because even though holds that the of doesn't have to be to do an But still there's a concept of means I'm going to leave it until tomorrow and as it relates to even though the was not to do or but it's still which is so yeah every single person in the world that would these words would say is big but you could be appear that would work either way on that note again hold it's the first line of says it's going to be the talk about One, by the way, is by the carbon that's in Paris. And the other one is with regards to the carbon where it says the first. That's by the carbon. Now I don't need two to tell me the concept of because one would be enough if I don't need a second to tell me that if you leave over the buser and you make iter that it's going to be possible. So I'll tell you that extra is coming to teach me that if you even have a to do that to leave it until tomorrow is that it's going to be possible. So you want to know my time? It's from an extra of which I don't need for the realer. Now the gar is going to go on now for a bunch of lines. Let's just mention in case it's bothering you and that is this would be a to literally where it was the says also said at this point we didn't explain that is going to ask this as a on but interrupts and said is it true theuda holds that thiser is extra and it's coming to teach me already used this or it's needed for the following. So again the says talking about the carbon this is what the PK sounds like if you read it from beginning to end essentially what the T is saying is the carbon had to be eaten on the day that it was brought. This is a kadesh because the was a schlam and usually had two days and a night to be eaten but the is different has to be eaten on the day that it's brought felt that there was a big dick here because really the seems to be very very wordy says the could have said three words they and I would have known everything. There's a lot of extra words here and from all these extra words the following let's see we learn from here that's the how do you know the says the is if somebody was he lost this he was then he found the original one so now you have an extra or the vlad of aid is a schlam and it could be in a ka or if somebody made of a tida how do you know that the buster of those animals also have to be eaten that day. Okay. How do you know that must also eat from the word right? We saw this already earlier in the that the fact that has to be eaten ironically is learned out from it's learned out from the sher. How do you know that the Schlomman that the Nuzer used to bring and the Shia Pesak also eaten for day and a night? Now Rashi speaks out the regular Schlomman we know was not eaten for a day and a night but the Xiaomi no and the Shia pes maybe are different. Now why would you think that the shami no and the shami pes are different the shami pes first of all what is the shami pes the shami pesak is the right that's the special that was brought not on pes but what was the purpose of the we've seen this already as well so that the person should get to a point where he's almost full like this when he eats the carbon like it's going to be so that is what's referred to as the shami test the shami is one of the three carbonas that had to bring the reason you would think these twoas are The Xiaomi Pac you would think is maybe like the Pesak. The Pac was also eaten only right by the next morning it was already nicer. The Xiaomi Nazer is similar to the carbon because it too came along with breads and being that it too came along with breads. So they could be a mean maybe it should be like that. So the regular schlom we're never going to ask how do I know regular schlum and the terrorist has you have two days and a night to eat it. But I could hear if there's something extra in this there are certain that maybe would be similar to the the or the be similar to the and maybe the result but either way I mean that okay how do you know the breads that came along with the carbon and the breads that came along with the two only eaten for a day and a night says carbon. So again all these extra words a whole bunch of and here's the punch line the way you read the is is that regards to all these things I just told you is half of regarding all these things of but here's the bottom line when it says this is not extra this is coming to teach me a whole bunch of very important is in the world of eat says how could you tell me is from the extra mention I need it for this says true but you could learn both you know like MK if all this was coming to teach me was that you're not allowed to eat these different parts of carbon beyond a day and a night the Tyra should have said the word and the reason it should have said the word because every single time the talks about niser what does it say the word niser or that's always the the word that's the word is throwing us for a loop over here and it's telling us and that's what we're going to do. So it's from the fact that the use the word and not the word that's how I know an extra. So right now the is that it says it's actual maybe not the whole is actually but the word is different and it's for that reason I know but asks all going to help you for half of right so we have a for half of that but what about The second half for that I would need a car in the parish of I don't have such a we know for a fact that that time is now you know that are you not that in the event that would leave over the tomorrow being so too if he didn't leave it over the only to leave it over. It should be personal as well. So number one, the doesn't work because it only helps you mass and number two I know it's not himself told me what the is. So the says you're right is and what's the is like HIMSELF EXPLAINED IT THAT IF YOU WOULD DO it would be possible if you only have a to do it it's going to be possible as well. Okay. So we now know time of the time. Now we have to go back to the Mishna because the Mishna mentioned the cases holds and then the Mishna gave a whole list of cases where it's going to be. Now if the anytime I have a to do something that puts the carpet in a compromised position that creates a reality and now all of a sudden it's puzzle. So I don't know it sounded like the Mishna mentioned a lot of things that are problematic. All those things should potentially be issues. Now which one of those things? We don't have to do the work ourselves. The Gar is going to do it for us. So let's just go through the now that you tell me time. I think should have argued on all the other cases in the say slow down. Right. That's a big word. Let's let's let's work this through together. Which one? Let's take the case where a was bringing the carbon and he had in mind that he's going to take the bones of the carbon he's going to break it or he's going to roast the carbon you want over there to say no way right let's say you would do it let's say you would do it you did the and then when it came time to the bus you put it on and when it was half roasted you quickly took it off you ate it mama's rear that's not going to ple the carbon. Are you over love? Oh yeah. But is the carbon pos? Oh no. Right. The carbon is not possible. So there's no you don't have the so that's not a maybe the next part of the the case where the had in mind that should eat the or should be of the bad thing. So if you have to do it should be a problem. missile. Let's say he would do let's say to would eat from the bus or it as long as you have a good the carbon was a good carbon so it's not going to pass the carbon so there's no maybe the going to eat it is going to be again it wouldn't pass the car this by the way we have a lot of raid on from the we're going to get back to this at some point in different another listener to answer these last two of why according to or should not be a problem is because of two words what does he have a a basis is he in control does he have an ammonus so to speak to be able to go ahead and do it in other words in order for to be ava you would need that The that you had, this very bad thought that you had was something that is at least bey to be able to do. This person who's doing is not a he's not an right and he's going to have a mind that au is going to that you have a mind that is going to go ahead and do something is not a for a different reason. Forget about because it's not something that's beyond to do. It sounds like from this gamarra the only time you could ever have a would be if it's something that's in your control right just to bring out the point the Mishna says in the beginning of the paric that if would do and he would have avi the carbon would be possible oh if does the he has in mind that is going to be sounds like it would be what right how far he's supposed to take so this from agri is that the of kim is only true by rabbi who does mash It's not true by read something that we're going to get into. But moving along in what about the case where had in mind to take the dam of the carbon and to mix it together with dust, right? That's one of the case that Mich said the coin is going to be kosher. Why is a kasher? If you would mix it now, the carbon would be possible. Right? This is a problem because here you're handling the dam. If you don't have don kosher now you have no way to get a read. This is not like the previous cases we were talking about the buser and which anyways in the worst case scenario even if it happened this this terrible thought that you had if it played itself out exactly good bad even if it happened nothing would happen to the actual carbon but this would be a problem because if you don't have then you don't have a carbon but not anyways I'll tell you why is this is another who holds What about this case? In the event that the have a mind to do this in the wrong place. So what the mission say that's not a bad it should be a problem here as well. The not either. So that's the case. That's not a problem either says theor. What about this case? Raud should argue in the case where did it doesn't have to be we're just picking a case and he had a mind to do this on the wrong so the was supposed to go and he has he or vice versa in that case this new that it should be possible now why should it be possible why should it possible. We just said holds. So doesn't matter if you did or did it or vice versa. So Rashi asks the and Rashi says the is asking from one piece where the was supposed to be done on the and you did it on the that should be a problem. And you know why? Not because of this even. It's because there's just like we know there's now take out of the there's also something called you can't take dam that belongs in the and bring it into the is why is it that was not in the case where it's over there if it would really happen it would be a problem. You know why not the dam itself became possible based on so bas right seems very consistent and they should argue in that case again has okay you only have the but if because if it would happen it would be a problem but for it to happen it's also a What about just like as well that's also not audited is if That bad place is a place that you were allowed to do. You were allowed to be and you were allowed to eat. If however that So, and it's for that reason it doesn't pass to have the sheet of as it relates to now this really requires a little bit of beer. It requires a lot of bit of beer. We'll just give it a little bit of beer. And that is there is an idea that in order for it has to be but we're not talking about what are we talking about? We're talking about Yehuda's quote unquote and the Gomorrah is suggesting that we should apply to the and the Gmorrah seems to be answering you can't have because that of is the and the is not a that's in the probably can't either maybe you could but that's not something you're supposed to do. So the point is it's not and as a result it's not again it's right the learn it out from the word right has to be okay so I have a lim that teaches me the of the but this is a new that is learned out it's not even learned out from above that anytime I have a mind to do something that if I would do that it would render so now it should be possible as well. So you're telling me that there's no because at the end of the day the is not what does it have to do with let's just explain this a little bit better that's if you take the dam and you bring it into the right it's only by the way we know that but if you take the dam of and you bring it into the we're discussing however that because there's such absole there should be that if you think about doing it should be a problem as well. The Gmorra is saying that just like you find by the has to be that's so also has to be a why in the world would that be the case the does not explain it but either way says the that's the you want to know why was not as it relates to the minute you take the dam into the it's going to be so it should mean from a and from a answer is because the is not a that's true that it has to be says it says in the so the says So says don't bring a carbon that's but then it adds not only so what's coming to be says it's coming to me two things number one number one that was brought number to additionally it's coming to teach me that if you did a talking about but you had in mind to take the is that it's going to be possible. You see clearly doesn't hold this far. In fact, in this price taco holds that just like you have so that's going to be a problem. But the says one. So if you look at the changes the word from right the first was now the say but we learned inn and this is said we're talking about that was born into if it was born it's going to be amazed but if it's going to be a problem stating that said that was true only bishop keeper if there was a that was with it. But if wasn't done with it, it's not going to be a problem. In other words, ready for this doesn't even hold the is that if you bring the and you do that's when it's going to be a problem. But now over there where you actually brought the inside only if you did this is going to be a problem. If you didn't do this, it's not going to be a problem over here. was was a like certainly now this clearly is a contradiction to the previous because the previous said if you had in mind just to bring it inside it's going to be possible. Now we have rabuda that says that even when you physically bring it in it's not possible unless you actually do this if you don't do this not. So we're a little bit uh confused over here again, right? We have three that we're trying to juggle because in our Mishna seems to hold there's no when it comes to the cash is why not has an eight. Maybe the only time you have is we don't really understand it so much is if it's a problem somewhere else actually said that if you have a it's going to be a problem which is not like and it's also not like the gave to explain obviously doesn't hold you have to have a that's then the said I have another says there isn't even such a concept of there's not even such a If you do this, that's when you're dealing with an issue keep but if you didn't do a keep that it's not going to be a problem. So a little bit fat over here inud and the gets out of it by saying he had to say this two right just to come back to what we need is clearly said only said right those are the two cases what emerges is that's only there's another which is one of the braes that just brought that holds that if you would have a to take the and beas with it and bring that too would be a problem. So really this last piece of is a very important addendum to the because in it sounds like only if the was or really according to that would be a problem as well but the is going to continue. So we just bought a Bria that said it says and from the word two things number one that's number two that's also going to be a problem. So now we're going to digress a little We're going to focus on the first of those two learn. Is it true to the is going to be you would have thought it says in the third literally this and then it says literally those words and in this price is for a bad thing. Now what does it mean? So Rashi says top line but the bottom line is I have a blatant contradiction between twoas in one is and in the other specifically says means not it has to be a real like but something else not. So how do you reconcile this? says again I'll leave it to the bottom line is this which seemed like a very innocent right turns out this is like a super controversial you wouldn't expect it you didn't see it coming but that's really what it is because both halves of this both said not that way and said not that way so both of these These Yehudas are really very very big. Anyway, let's uh come back to where we are and that is has a very big in our and that is what are the words in the even if you have a mind to eat it to be to spritz it to pour it all those things that it's not necessary is it's going to be possible in the we have a hold that if it was and you had a mind to bring it into the that would be an issue as well. So the gumar now is going to bring a a statement that was made by the abba a comment on it's a lisha comment and I think it's kadite just to refresh ourselves from a gumar that we learned about a week ago and that is the Mishna had said that as much as it's true if someone has it creates not only a carbon but a very unique type of it's known as pickle. What's unique about pickle? If somebody eats from the bosser of pickle, he's like eating onion keer. It's like eating on pes, right? Just to put it into perspective, he's going to be it's very very the only time that's true is if there was no other that was done in any one of the meaning if other than this pickle everything else was done perfectly that's when there's a pickle. If however there's another problem then not right. It has to be where without this everything else was fine. Obviously, this is anything but fine. This is the worst case scenario. It's pickle. But we actually take into account what would have been had we not had the pickle. And it's only if the answer to that question is this would have been a perfect carbon. Then the is now it's going to be pickle. Now there was interestingly enough. What would be if first there was a piggle and then afterwards you had that other say I don't care at the end of the day once at some point there's another like that makes this carbon apostle a carbon at that point this will never become pickle says no I actually care about what comes first if the other comes first and then by the time you add the mash's pickle this was already not a perfect carbon so then it's not going to be the pickle but if you had the mak's pickle first then not is going to introduce what would If someone had a who holds that is aval and then afterwards would have a mach would it be pickle or would we say that it's not pickle at first glance what would you think for sure it shouldn't be pickle it's like so you would think Hey, it's now another problem that this carbon has you don't have. This carbon is going to be a not a carbon is going to be now that it could be even though Yehuda holds something called but it's not treated the same as a regular if one would have first it's so actually have to technically be first based on the previous but if you would have av and then afterwards have avas the pickle would still be avle. Says the said the in the event let's say was done and then afterwards there was that the would be pickle. You would have thought what do you mean once you had a so that's like a at this point it can't be pickle anymore because outside of the pickle this carbon anyway is problematic when it comes to it's different that is not going to be said I'll prove it to you I actually have a the pigle because every pickle right every pigle in the world until you do a it's not a machev pickle Right? Why not? Because pigle requires in order in order for it to actually become a pickle. Yet the cover of a pickle. But once you do this, at that point it does become a pickle. Says Raa, how's that even possible? So this is a little bit of a heart shila. I think it's cuz I to read Rashian inside. So is five lines from the bottom from the top. I'll prove to you that is not like a regular pickle. the piggle. What would be if someone had a piggle and the pigle that he had was so pickle can come in one of four shapes and sizes. It could be is going to be from the case where you had in mind to do the in other words means right. So you have in mind to do this he did this before the actually does this. It's not right because you have to have because we know every pickle is not doesn't really have effect until you do this rec today. However, this before it became a piggle cuz it doesn't become avig. Why was it? Because when you had a mind to do this tomorrow, you had a mind to leave the d around tomorrow. Now doesn't need that doesn't need ONE NEEDS PICKLE NEEDS. SO really this that you're having in mind tomorrow it's second and it's not going to be until you actually do this yet when you do this that's one of the cases when you do this we don't say we don't say that once it At that point they can't be called a must that doesn't because then every time you do you are dead on arrival because you have the before the pickle that's pickle 101 because doesn't require said I'll prove to the so it must be this way says over there over there it was one is saying even by two it could be there's enough where the is the versus where there was and it could be the of material of is not here's the punch line is not that there's no soul that was in the carbon before the pigle was that's not the nuda the nuda is that there's no soul study other than the mak's pigle that created any carp understood that the of means that you need a kasher carbon at the time that the pickle's going to be that's what you need again the soul pickle and that That has to be the mat theor is being could be that's not the criteria. It could be the criteria is not that the carbon has to be kosher. The criteria is that there can't be any soul in the carbon THAT'S COMING ABOUT FROM SOMETHING other than the pickle. Meaning just explain this a little bit better. Even though this car as it relates to pickle that's posit that the carbon is possible as soon as you do the you do the carb's possible right we know the carbon is possible. What is the pigle the but it's anyway right away right so you'll tell me it's not called because it's ready puzzle the ter that's the piggle so we're just extending that a little bit more the fact that it's doesn't bother me because came about through the pickle being that it came about through therefore it's not initial but as rel and pickle It could be over there. It's going to be different. In fact, not only do we not have a right is going to ask we're going to give it away is going to end up. So we thought is so it's from every is actually going to knock out says and the question was actually asked right sometimes happens already knew about it. from a in the event that was done with you to do a that's supposed to go or to do that's supposed to go if it was done with a to do this today it's going to be meaning you would have thought according to obviously right who else according to maybe it should be possible it's kosher oh and we know this right for the mission This is one of the examples of there's no problem over here. What would be if after the had a mind had a mind to do this or something else? Because the first did nothing first did nothing. So now you have a white board essentially. It's a regular carbon with a weird mash but that's fine. It didn't impact it. So as a result if you had what would be I'm sorry what would be if he had in mind to do not but to do then ready possible. So in this case he had in mind to do a a he had in mind to do a that was supposed to go but on the next day. So there it's going to be possible if he had a mind afterwards. If he had a mind whether it was or it's going to be in either way it's going to be by now there's one piece that we need in order to understand this. Rashi quotes it. that it's really but says that the ready earlier in the was this of that hold not going to go into this now but it's true only sole and what is the price of that's what we need bold letters that could be in small letters in bold letters. So if you have in mind after it's why it's not because there's a problem over here you don't have a this is checkmate a similar Now the way Rashi learns the gam this is only do this is talking about a regular pickle where someone had a mind to eat the but was that a to eat the so he had in mind that a tom is going to eat the baser what's the is that being that is not eat you would have thought it's not a good is maybe not ano that creates said I'll prove it to you. meaning I'll prove to you that if you have in mind to do an that's not a good it's still the because really before you do this is not yet if you have a mind to eat the before you did this it's it's possible I right now right now you're not allowed to eat it so you see clearly even though you can't eat it now it's fine doesn't have to be roy meaning that as long as it's enough. So just like an is considered regarding soil of would be as well when you do this it's going to be and you're going to have to do this anyways for in order for it to be so it's inevitable that you're going to end up doing this it's going to be so then even though it's going to be okay but there's no way to make him be allowed to eat it. So it's for that reason that maybe would be different. Wow. So this was this is not something one time said. This is must have been a fest brisket, right? If this was marume but either way the carbon that wasn't roasted or the from which the truma was not taken from if someone is and he eats from it he's going to be now the background to this is which we went through already and that is if someone's and he eats is stating that the only is is if it's a situation where had he been he would have been allowed to eat the but if had he been to would not have been allowed to eat the for example it was so then is that he's not going to be of so used to say that you could have thought a carbon that wasn't roasted yet from you didn't take you can't eat has to be roasted that's the way you have to eat the carbon pes right and told you that you have to take trauma from, right? We know there's like a real type of trauma. So, you have to take trauma from it. So you could have thought that it's not in a situation of and as a result if a Tommy would eat from it he wouldn't be so it's not the case that in these two situations and the the is that being that the and those are the real mater of these things even though there's still something that needs to happen there's finish that's required but that's not in this right we talked about it's not that only if it's something that you're allowed oh my will prove it to you the time we learn to it says and this is said in the parish of the it's marble that in the event that a would eat of is he would be of course what do you see from here right you're never allowed to eat either it's or it goes on you're never allowed to eat still even though they're not yet ready to be eaten so too you're going to be over here in other words you see as long as you do this and it's me that could be eaten that it would be enough for you to be I right now the mice I can't eat it. Yeah, you can't eat it. There's no And the reason there is no is because what does it mean? What was the of it says so is that even if it's not something that's but as long as it's something that's so that in of itself would be enough for you to be able to be that's true didn't go to the and carbon is going to be eaten by the so there you don't have the papay And it's also notem. So you can't include it in that word. You can't say maybe it should be like no is not a that it doesn't have to be something that you're allowed to eat. And is that if it's that if it's something that and you eat it then you're going to be but this is neither here nor there. It's like it's for that reason it's not going to be an issue. It's not every day that you skip the last line of a paric but it's in parenthesis and on that note by the way just like the high level like what just happened in the last like 10 15 minutes of the so it was a digression right was a digression but if you look at the sign of the digression it started in as much as but doesn't have the ability to stare a pickle and was then two other places where said something they're all but they're all not they were all digression. The second one was regarding and the last one was regarding the and the was and the said he exhale. So, as it relates to raid, just to lighten it up a little bit, this week's para is parasyak and there's a kum component to parasyak. So I thought in the spirit of it's maybe just to talk a little bit some of the caution that's tucked away in par the pulk says almost immediately after and his family emerged from the those words I mentioned a few times in the but specifically this is The very next and he took he took from all the kosher animals, all the kosher birds and he brought carbon. What type of carbonos? smell the says, "I accept the and as a result swore." The first thing that did when he emerged from the was the very very first thing and after he built the misbehave who said that why is it that the very very first thing that Noak did was is he built him as Bak and he brought carbonas and he said based on something that he heard from Marag his father the brisker of who said that it's the inic of he's talking about the says the was very very precise and then he says there's a that everybody had that the place that built their That's the place that built the and that's where he did the that's the place that built his when he emerged from the carbon and that's where brought his carbon when he was born and that's where he was born from. And tell that why did the ram say what there would have been a maybe brought the carbon there before he was born or after he died obviously it's when he brought it when else could he have brought it said it's pos what the rama means when he says kisha is not after he was born 10 years later but literally literally in other words the first thing that did when he was born was is he brought a carbon and that's what the means of carbon and was because we know there's three pillars on which the world stands and but one of the three pillars is and the perfect world is to bring carbonas was the first person to be created the world was just created it's the sixth day of creation and he understood that in order for this means without breaking that carbon. So the first thing that he did was the minute he was born he went ahead and he brought a carbon. So emerged from the table and right now is the only person in the world and he comes out and the world is being restarted from but the point is no is person number one in this world right now as it relates to the second version of the world. It's all starting from Noyak. So what does Noyak do? He does exactly what Marishian did. What was the Marishian's first move when he was born? He went ahead and he brought a carbon. So no followed in his footstep. What was the first thing that he did? He went ahead, he brought a carbon. Now in the we have a whole on this idea the premise of Rome. We bid it from many makers and kazal that when no was born it wasn't be a continuation of the previous world but rather no emerging from the ta was in many ways his but the point is said that's why the very very first thing that did was because that was the first thing that did and it wasn't punct that was the first thing did it was something that had to be done first cuz the only way the world could have a is if there's going to be carbon is the first person in the world. So the world should have a he brings the carbon right now through whom the world is going to regenerate. He's that first person in the world as well. This is the first moment of this new creation. So what does Noyak do? He does exactly what Marishian does. He went ahead and he brought a carbon. That's the first. The second is and I saw this also in the shurim from Rome Levy. And this I saw also in the from and that is if you take a look at the on the says the what was this built this is the built when he was pushed out of and he brought a carbon on it and when the water of the m came it it got ruined went and he rebuilt it. He was he fixed it up and he went ahead and he and he bought a car. It's in the this misbeh. rather he took a misbehav that the brisk said that what's sounds like this was like important like what's the significance of it and why couldn't just build his maybe that's what the means when it says Then he went ahead and he built him says that's not what it was. Where's this in coming from that didn't build his own misb from scratch but rather he took a mb that had already existed the misb from no less and he went ahead and he and he built on it said the brisk that the in the beginning of the second parag when he talks about the so he talks about how precise had to be the way he opens the place is very precise and you're never allowed to change it. Skipping to when the came from back there. So there were three that came along with them. One of them. He was made with the measurements on the carbon. But the Rambam says that when the Yidden came back to they needed a no to tell them where the was said to build and to get the mos right is something that had to be done ali. If it wasn't done ali you can't go ahead and do it never had a nvu as far as we know where he was told this is where the mame is and this is the place that you should go ahead and you should bring your carbonus so how would have known where the makame is said that's why it had to be that the place that brought his carbonus was a place that already had an existing misb and it was really done al from who knew where Misb was when he built his misb and that's how was able to be and that's how was able to know where to build a misb but it's not that is going ahead and he's renovating the because is in the mik and the only way you're going to get it right is and as far as we know and it's for that reason it's for that reason said mara says means that he went ahead and he just fixed up the was already made by other this is what the rish said over in the name of maragris but I think that it could be it's very very muy in the rama I'm sure this always bothered me and it could be this is you go to the raom again in days and read it carefully I think we've read this together in the a couple of times right carefully the place that built the misbeh which was in the of right that was the place that built his and that's where he was and that's the place that's the place built his when he left the AND THAT'S DOESN'T SAY. What's the It's going back on what he said in one line earlier. It's not the same as it's the is just building on the already existed. It's the I think in this we've seen so many times there's a grace to this from that's the second the third and this is a classic the says takes from all the kosher animals and all the kosher birds and he brings Frank all the kosher animals can't take all the kosher animals. We just together there's only three animals that are to go on the right. Those are the three animals that you're allowed to put on the a sheep, a goat or an ox. All the other animals are not okay. They're kosher to eat, but they're not coaching to put on the So what's so said that there's a that tells us the reason why it is that picked these three carbonas to be the carbonus from where you're allowed to bring a carbon. I gave you 10 behemoths. Three of them are in your domain. They're easy for you to catch. Some of seven of them are not in your domain. They're hard to find. The three that are in your domain. The seven that are not in your I'm not going to be to go ahead and try to find the ones that are not the ones that are the reason these three animals are the animals that were chosen is because these three animals are in the of a person. The other seven would be very hard to come by. And being that they'd be very hard to come by, said that was all true was in the he already had all the animals together for him there was no for him there was no to have to go ahead and take all the ANIMALS THEY WERE MAMISH with him so That's we're going to do a part two. There's a lot more.