Zevachim 21

Today's is and we are about 10 lines from the top of so the has been discussing the mentioned in the Mishna theim that cannot do any that was other say as well one of the mentioned was that didn't wash his hands and feet from the he's possible to do the avoid if he does the avoid the avoid is going to be. And we had a whole a few that digressed a little bit that discussed the mitzvah of also known as the mitzvah. This idea that a had to wash his hands and feet before he did the he would go to the k the would wash his hands he'd wash his feet. Once he did that he was ready to do the sh that we discussed in yesterday's and that is if comes to the mikdash on Monday and he stays through the night it's now Tuesday morning he's continuing to do the does he have to again or does he not have to again said as soon as the sun rises The coion is null and void and as a result he'd have to wash his hands and feet all over again from the said and is had to understand the describes the it says on the one hand is the emphasis on meaning every time he enters the he has to wash his hands. That's what Shim holds. Whereas the emphasis on and the definition of gisha is every that was on the was considered a newish so that every morning when there was a new would have to wash his hands and his feet all over again. Regardless, we had a little bit of a complex that discussed this is going to continue on this theme and by the end of the we're going to be back knee deep into discussing this. We mentioned yesterday that that's partial that if the co was from the he would have to all over again the was only when the wasn't but to the extent that the hadas at that point for sure he would have to be again from the king. Question is if the leaves the aar does he now have to wash his hands and feet again or not says even if you hold that is and that's only that's because he never left the but if he leaves the it could be leaving the in and of itself constitutes or perhaps even though the left but being that he can always come back and it could be his intention is to come back. So that we don't necessarily assume that because he left he was again that's if the was then he has to be again when he resumes doing the the question is leaving the does that constitute in of itself or does that not constitute in itself then he became he has to nowad and it doesn't have to again. You would have thought that if it becomes and he has to wash for his maybe he should have again the bottom of the is going to clarify this statement. But what we need is the next part. If the leaves he's still meaning he doesn't have to be isn't that if he's he doesn't have to be say that is not discussing where the person's g became or the person's g left the azara. We're discussing where his hands became tom or where his hands left the azor and the bra says the part of it that we need that if a's hands become or if they leave the azor he doesn't have to be again but our sh was where his goof left maybe over there he does have to again so we will p that if the kan stuck his hands out of the zor then he does not have to again that's that wasn't the shil the shil was where his entire Does that constitute does it not constitute said that a who wasn't is considered unfit to do the so how does the wash his hands and feet but the says it doesn't have to be the any is going to be if he was but it wasn't rather it was it was outside the or he did it in the but he didn't do it in he did it. So the price is said that if he was in a that's the part that we need is it's a problem the has to be from the it doesn't have to be from the but at the same time it has to be from the has to be if it would be in aut says the it sounds like the whole issue is if the kdes itself was but kes But let's say and then he would leave that would be because if you're going to tell me that any time the outside that in of itself is an issue then obviously if he's a problem forget the fact that the is an issue it sounds like being is not a problem. The problem is just doing the so isn't it that is not an issue. In other words, does not constitute says no. When we say it's possible, we're not talking about where his entire if his entire I don't need a B to tell me it's possible. It's possible. It's possible because the minute the leaves outside, he already has to bead again. When the was inside, he just stuck his hands outside and he was mad outside. And there the is it's possible because his hands and feet need to be inside while he's doing the kdush and you can make a that had the kdush been inside and afterwards he would have stuck his hands or his feet outside it would have been kosher and we don't have a problem with that. We saw that in a price a moment ago and that wasn't the sh the sha is where his entire go left it could be again that price is not discussing where the gof left the azor there's no mention of that in the b is discussing where his hands or his feet left the azor but that wasn't the sh was where his entire left a left the walls of the azor in if he went He's going to spend some time there as when he comes back if he went for a short period of time as pretty clear, right? It says if he leaves even if he goes temporarily he left the for a couple of minutes when he comes back he again. Why? Probably because he'd see a constitute. So it's been told I don't hear the whole told him. Now I'll tell you why it's not from there. Could be when we say he went he didn't just leave. Could be he went to use the facilities. He went to use the bathroom. The reason he again is not because he left. It's because of what he did when he left. But the says it says It's a separate line item in that. So you can tell me both lines in the mean the same thing. When it says that he went he means he went to it says it's two lines in the B. They both mean the same thing. The first line is a little sum. It's not clear. At first glance it sounds like he just left. Really that's not true because if he just leaves maybe he doesn't line. When does he need only if he leaves and he does something of significance. For example, he goes to the bathroom. The second line in the B is the first line in the B. The bottom line is we don't have a we don't have a we're not sure yet regarding the did the avoid of the he had to wash his hands and feet. He needed before he was prepared to do the said where did he wash his hands and feet he did he did it the same place every did he went to or in any other and that's where he did his and then he left the was different being that the par we know wasn't it was like the says throughout it because it never went on the B on the where was the so to speak of the was it was on but it wasn't physically this is different so even though there is but it doesn't have to happen it could be it could be you can even do it out of you do it out of a cup you can do it out of a spoon you could do out of a a bowl you could do it out of out of anything but the bottom line is holds that it had to bear and it had to be the frag doesn't make any sense. If you're telling me the lion has to be and then when he goes to do the he's going to be so the second he goes he lost the he lost the lion. So the if you're telling me that every time the and he left that he should have to do all over again. So how do you understand the parad wasn't or didn't have to be. So there's no concept of with the parad but according to who holds that the was with him and then he goes outside to do the the so the second he goes outside isn't there this so shouldn't we be able to be said there's no right from the possible was different isn't going disqualified the sha is a regular they had to be done the went outside temporar now he comes back so the question is being that when he went outside he wasn't going outside to do the because so maybe over there it's different you're telling me that doesn't have a real it was or so why then does the lion have to be done with if avoid was certainly the red line should be able to be done. So I I hear says the what you're saying you're telling me don't bring me that there's no because that's why the could go but is the to the extent that the is being done. So now how do you understand his entire position that has to be but I hear but on some level we know that the was always treated like a regular carbon says throughout by the way one example one application of the is that if the garra says was having while he was bringing the paradma the paradum was possible be possible. So here even has to be but at the end of the day there's not going to becomes does he have to be all over again or not? If you're going to tell me that there's no if he goes out you could say what was the that if a leaves he should have again was because when he leaves he's so could be here he's not because just because he left nothing happened to him that he's suddenly disqualified from doing the he has to come back he plans on coming back maybe he was having over here where the so right now he's in a state where he cannot do the maybe there he is being that even though he's not going to be Tommy forever he's soon going to be in a in a classic case he can go to and by night already be able to do the so could be maybe he's not from the bright that we brought on the top of the when he became what do you see from here that even though he became he doesn't have to again say from the beginning of the you know it's not we already explained that that is talking about not where his entire became but when his where his hands became his hands became a you have to do is It's not so complicated. Two times, three times four times. It's it's each hand. It's not a big deal. That's not considered something that you would think would trigger what what's called became tom. Now he's really now he has to go to the mikvah. Now he can't do the now we're dealing withis. There's already a whole different deal. That's the do you say that will trigger or not? By the way, it sounds like it's meaning we know is a problem when a leaves is heas or is he not? I don't know. Ask him. But that's really the right does it trigger or does it not trigger? But regardless, you're telling me the I don't think that's a typically mean that he's going to have to wait until the sun sets. certainly he can't do the before. So meaning he's going to have to wait till before he's able to do the so it's so thear is flipping now the is saying of course it constitutes you have to wait until night who cannot be for an entire day that's an incredible amount of of self-control of your thoughts that a person would have to have to assume that maybe this person wasn't mas I think the This is he he was says you're right if he became in the morning and now he has to wait 10 hours before that's true but the sh is going to be okay that's a very different shil maybe it's not such a long period of time till the sun sets when the sun sets he's going to be ready to do the but right now he's not do we say that in and of itself triggers or not from the same place that we brought previously when the to get ready to do the mice of the so where did he wash his hands and feet said the same place he always washed his hands and feet by and after he goes out to do the we know the that was involved in doing the we would be the we went to the would go out of their way to take the co that's involved in the and make him and then they would so if you've never heard this this may sound a little surprising and the reason they would do this is because used to say that In order for someone to be able to do the mice of the he had to be held at and not only did he have to bear he couldn't be at so if he became you would have to wait until she till the sunset. So he's no longer at full in order for him to be able to do the but the way it says we actually had the here one of the hard that we had in the beginning of the week where the said is actually the rabbis even at so even at was allowed to be involved in the so between the and the held that when it says it means he can't be at the were the said no he's a the rabbis even if he's not a full-fledged even if he's merely a he's someone that can't do the he's somebody that can eat but is different over here it's going to be okay so what did they hear this the that's being involved in the they take a sher and put him on now you're going to the mikvah before sheish get involved in the m so while he was at fully why would they do because held that it wasn't okay. So the living that's what they did. Now the problem is is this was like a tremendous a tremendous zoo in the whole concept of of tum specifically as it relates to the paradum. So what the did is they countered this ka with incredible there's a lot of hum that are mentioned in sh made certain mile and in the laws of par so that you shouldn't think that because we're being that that means that there's some of the specifically as it relates to so they went and they imposed this phenomenal but the problem is now they're worried about the so they they counter that with a whole bunch of bottom line says that the did the was he was right because that's what they did. What's the if you're telling me that the was involved with the par had to go to do and according to he even had to do it in the now that he became so shouldn't we say he needs another if creates then every single that's involved in the of the we have a major issue because he had then we made and were not aware of another that took place is different. The fact that that's pretty big. Okay. So the fact that then became doesn't have to do another that shouldn't bother you so much either. That's not the biggest in in par even a bigger kan could do it ordinarily a fully can't do it. So the whole parish of par is different being that the parish of par is different. says, "So why do you do it in the first place?" If he told me that to usually knocks out and this we're going to be so then why do the because that again like we said earlier so you walk this fine line whenever you deal with the laws of on the one hand you treat it like and on the other hand you don't treat it like on the one hand you have all these different we've compiled some over the years like 10 or so where you find and then again you find all these different with is is from the basic laws of so right here you have two number one the fact that can be involved in the is never allowed to do the can't even certainly shouldn't be able to be involved in the number two usually after if we came to like in the previous that should not over here it's different why is it different because the is going to be different another so the way the kan used to wash his hands and feet from the k is the water would come out of the faucets of the k meaning the k would stand by the k water would drip out his hands his feet the explained a little bit on just practically exactly how it happened but the bottom line is is the wasn't in the k right the k wasn't a a bathtub it wasn't a little swimming pool he would stand outside of the k and the water would come down from the kar what would be if the kayen jumped into the k he's physically in the k his hands and His feet got wet. Is that considered or not? What's the it says in the meaning the water should come from it? Meaning you shouldn't be in it. Maybe even if the goes into the actual care, it's going to be okay. So one of the things mentioned in the that was mentioned that discuss what is okay and what's not okay for is if the in he'd go into a lake of some sorts is he the would be possible it wouldn't it sounds like the gumar is going to say that in it of itself the fact that the coin goes into the body of water doesn't bother me what bothers me is it's a main But the fact that he's in the water as opposed to the water coming on top of him is not an issue. It sounds like if you'd be in the in a way that's similar to being in the meaning would be immersed in the it sounds like it would be okay. But it says maybe really if he goes into the K it's not okay. And still there's that would be okay. You would have thought when a person he would be taught I would have thought that if the works for that's why that price of that has to speak out that the mayor is possible which doesn't work it's not a mikvah. So if someone that's really tummy couldn't go to the K and so it could be over there it's part that it's not okay meaning really as it relates to the water has to come from the has to come from so what's not coming from you would have thought it works certainly it work here's the hard part of the So a three-way how to understand the we discussed in yesterday's and that is yesterday's we had was that the diddesh And now it's a new day. He did it on Monday and now it's Tuesday. Does he have to do again or does he not? Says a new day as soon as the sun rises from yesterday is null and void says no. Just because it's a new day doesn't mean anything. Discuss that this is ramifications. If the May was in the K meaning the didn't do the line but rather the water was in the K and now Lena and the Gmorra discussed in that context as well whether Lena for the make that the water should now be possible or not and the Gmorra presented it as false said according to Rebi that holds Lina for that actually did the lion certainly it's poshit to the gumar that if the water is in the K and now there was Lina it's going to be possible was the one that holds what about if the water was in the do you say the same or maybe if it's in the in that case it's going to be different so the Gmorra had different say what they had heard in the name of Allah the was that seemed to have come out that the same shil regarding the co that physically did the condition you would have with regards to the make that remain inside the k so if the water was in the k it wasn't touched no co used and now it's a new day you have to recycle the water you have to get rid of the water and bring fresh water or no there's no just because that in of itself is not going to be a shared discussing according to the that holds when the water is in the so this from yesterday's that is ready because if you assume that when the physically washed his hands and free from the K the same thing is going to be true if the water remained in the so that when exactly does a the water become light now to understand this you have to have one piece of background information. We mentioned yesterday that the definition of that's the classic definition sends us to that discusses the with regards to the one of them and was that you were able to be the entire night but once the morning came these were possible you couldn't bring them the next day or the next night there's something called Lena to avoid Lena you could put it on the there's a mandama that holds But the point is is that there was and Lena said that once it's you can't use these anymore that's as it relates to the am there's with regards to the as well that's a whole another by the way that is the to the famous with regards to and et comes from a few had one of his either way so some nice raid to come in the next few weeks but the bottom line is is the gmorra says that as soon as the Sun sets if there was any dam any blood of a carbon the dam became possible. So let's say a carbon was brought and the k didn't have a chance to do. He looks outside. That's it. It's over. He can't do this anymore. There's no way to do now. Obviously at night you can't do this. Anyways, the is that is a so to speak. As a result, the d becomes ple and you won't even be able to do it the next day. In other words, the there's a between the as it relates to the and the as it relates to the as it relates to the is is in the as it relates to is theor wants to know what's the with regards to the make here when exactly did they make according to that holds which means whether the or K or whether the water is simply sitting in the K. There's when isolina is in the of the which is in the of the which is let's see inside it depends why the is going to the K. If the client's going to the K to do to do. So then the of the is what of the that he's doing the with would be. So then if it was during you're done. If it wasn't during you're not if the is going to do the which is not but rather then the lina of that is going to be based on that. So it's will also be so if the water was out during was that in the middle of the night but it wasn't out during you want to use it for the dam it's not good because itself was absol you can't use it anymore if you want to go do with it's okay because theself is and being that their is so the of the that is going to use to make himself now to is going to be in that as well. So here is always the opposite in that they used to take the wood of the K like we had in yesterday's and cotton patent and they would put it underground time and they wouldn't take it back up until the next morning. And the reason is is at first glance the Gar is going to think because he's a third he's just the opposite is is that is a problem both if the wants to use the form or if the wants to use the for the so threeas three sheet is when exactly the mind becomes possible just one thing to clarify and that is there's a between lina of time and of lina means if the the for example were around not on the as soon as came it's possible is the it's the moment of is not the moment of but at if at any point during the night the dam would be exposed or the in this case would be exposed that would be enough for there to be absolina right it's an important distinction so as it relates to the of it's the moment the sun rises as it relates to the selena at any point in the night. Bottom line is so it depends on why the coin's going to the if it's for then the Mayan according to Rabbi would be in the mat which is at any point in the night what we'll call if it's says it's always ambiguous says at first glance says saying is it's always and even for which is which you were able to do the whole night. It doesn't matter. But the water that you're going to use to make yourself to do can't be exposed that night. It's interesting could be around that night. But the water that the going to use that can't be around by night. But the has a problem saying yesterday in the name of that wasn't brought underground time. You can use it. But the bottom line is didn't he say you can use it for? So if he said first you can use it for it sounds like it's at the very least it's going to be okay. So theor says you have to say we didn't mean this is going to be okay. He meant to say that is definitely not what he meant was says. So then he's saying what said in other words he's distinguishing between using it for using so he's saying at the end of the day essentially is the first isn't that says the way Rashi explains it first long rash on the is that said that there's a real on the forash never said there's a real said was it's it's a much softer term says it really is an absol but it's okay and that's why he never used the word. That's why he changed language said never said because it's not possible. It's just do it leave it there at night. But it's only it's only now the Gumar is going to come back later and ask if that's the case. Then that's the second shar because then you're telling me that holds that really there's no soul at all of even for the it's all that was the second opinion is going to ask that but for right now the Gmorra said you're asking me is it says meaning according to it's not it's a real it's according to it's says remember this the end of yesterday's so theor said when the would do which was dummy which was still he didn't have to wash his hands all over again it was a little bit of a kadesh because if being that this was which is before when it comes to technically there should be a problem is a little bit of a nuance So does and it sounds like he leaves the water out. The is if there's a that you have to keep the water submerged. It has to be on the ground then after the did the shouldn't he have had an obligation to bring the water back down? Shouldn't he have had to have done that? So like going to who held again this is all from yesterday's that was going that whole member of was who holds obviously holds and over here is explaining so you can't ask me aashan is worried about this shika here and over there he doesn't seem to be worried about it it's not aasha There he's going in the world of that holds. Here he's going in the world of that holds. But according that said was going according to if you tell me and that is that there's a mitzvah. There's a mitzvah that the water is supposed to be submerged meaning as long as it's underground for that's going to be a fine but the whole night there's this that the water is supposed to be on the ground. So if the water is supposed to be on the ground there's this Mr. Shik said how come when the took the water up the he wasn't forced to put it back down right away. So the Gmorra says who said he didn't do it. We assume that he didn't do that because the Bryce didn't say that he did it but maybe really he did do it but the Gmorrah says he tell me now that is that the of the both for the m and for the is what happens during the night there's no even if you're going to use the make for the that usually then themselves would be possible it doesn't matter the of the is always going to be in stating that there's a that the water should be underground during the night. There's like just keep it there ideally but it's not going to be possible. The water is not going to be possible unless so let's go back to the name of the name of you but the next day why can't you have to know where to put the commas in this am I period am I in so right am I am I throwing myself off so luro What's the big deal? What happened? Nothing happened. There's no You have to say notades. You can't be that ain't you don't need new water because there is no because there's no there's no of the bottom line is that even for the it's okay as long as it wasn't meaning is that the of the is even for the mater I didn't say that's all that's all but it's okay. Isn't that never said there's a mitzvah to go ahead and do is the one that said to do so just before we go ends on a lighter note but just before we go vit is just to make a just have a little bit of a recap. So this last piece of Gar is going in Reb's world rebi that holds and the question is what is the moment that the make becomes at what point would there be when it comes to you find on the one hand you find the at the same time you find the dam the exposed at any point during the night that's the so the of the alo or the of the matey. So what initially looked like three opinions the garra verified is really only two opinions. There's two real shittas in the gum. The first is the who holds it depends why the is using the mik. If he's using it for a m if he's using it for something who is then the of the for that thing is also going to be if he's using it for the is going to be says well the of the which is also holds that no of the is always going to be stating that there is a where there was to have the m submerged at night. Well, there was no said there was an that's what they used to do. They didn't do that. It wasn't necessary to do that because of the who cares what happens. You didn't have to worry about it. You did you did have to worry about this is referring to the first that's going to do the every day. who what was that he was going to do the so it was very dark in the base of nobody was able to see him you couldn't even hear his voice this is dramatic until they heard the sound of the wood they heard his wheel and all of a sudden he starts pumping and the starts coming up and everybody starts yelling the is starting to do the everybody wakes up this was the alarm in the B English they hear the starting to take the water up from It's it's it's coming. They're getting ready to do the so they said what did they hear the heard the water coming up. Isn't that a that the water was submerged during the night? It's a bish according to it was according to it was on the night. They needed to keep the water okay because you're worried about and they need to use it for the materina is only by and there's not even a mitzvah during the night. So why is the water submerged? What do they hear? So the gor says no. You know what they heard? It was just the opposite. You know when they used to wake up they used to wake up and they heard the water going underground meaning when the water was coming uh there was no water coming up it was exposed the whole night of going to so the client that's doing the is going to wash his hands and feet for the mad she doesn't have to do anything but the problem is that moment of creates so right before what did they do they would take the water and they would bring it underground so if they would take the water and they would bring it underground that was the noise that they heard but the says did it make noise when it was submerged says Because they used to use the wheel. Same thing. They used to use the wheel. And the reason they used the wheel is that's good for why they did it. They did it because they wanted the car up to here. They wanted the car was a good opportunity to wake the kahan up. But the gar says, "What did they need?" Well, there was a vector. His name was he used to wake people up. So why did we need the wheel to submerge? If you're taking the water up makes noise, but apparently to bring the water down didn't have to make noise. Sounds like they went out of their way for it to make noise. Why would they have done that? But the says, "Wasn't that job?" The says, "Yeah, right." Exactly. You have to set your alarm twice. Sometimes you have to have two times in case you missed the first one. You're going to end up getting the second one. The bottom line is that's the way this worked out. So either way before we end I had prepared three Haras but we'll only be able to speak out two. one # light raid and the other one a little bit of that. We had of one of the themes of the last two was this and or maybe it'll be concentrated or can't leave a brisk on the table or there are two bryes that discuss this between the second says that even if the is doing the 10 days. He does an he brings from a safer called said asked two kashes on this. The first kashi asked was it's that that's according to everybody if the was and then he was there was a real he has to be all over again disqualify the it would require him to do again his question was how is it possible for to go 10 days without being and his was based on what theor says says the person says I swear I'm not going to sleep for three days they give him immediately because he was it's not possible for a person to go three days without sleeping if you can't go three days without sleeping how is it possible and even say such a it's impossible to go 10 days without you know how I know that it's It's a you can't go three days without sleeping and when you sleep that was his first the second was a very if during every 10day period there's a shabas now in chabas you were allowed to do the but Friday night you couldn't do the avoid you know why because Friday night you couldn't do ordinary you couldn't do for example you couldn't do you couldn't do the only avoid that was the Problem is is the only you could have been able to do on a Friday night would have been from that were brought on Friday and the gar says that you could be on but you could be on that means Friday night there was no to do if there was no to do. So the was he's not doing any what's the saying and was as long as he's doing from now up until 10 days it's not possible to go 10 days straight doing the because Friday night there's going to be no to do so he brings this the he says that he was in this is before the war and he went to the imm So when he went to the he showed him his safer and he asked if he could take a look at it during shabas and he wanted something back from the after so the told him you know he was looking through the safer and he saw that you asked I saw two days number one you have to sleep isn't sleeping and number two Friday night what kind of you going to do Friday night craving so he told him like It's regarding the first sleeping he says then who said sleeping constitutes he says it's true it's but of the he said as it relates to so Friday night how's it possible to do where says that even though you couldn't go do but if the was already it was exposed to the fire you So where the as a result it's physically possible for a person to go 10 days without being is like this the is that said that this is a what's this says The next morning it's a problem. We mentioned this yesterday like but at the very least from the morning until night you can go 24 hours without having to be but then you have to read the fine print says there's four caveats. Number one this morning you shouldn't fall asleep shouldn't go to the bathroom and you shouldn't be if the did any one of those four things he has to be today's but the one thing that the adds that we didn't see in the is he shouldn't sleep that's what the said true it's but the iss What the says is because sleeping constitutes it's not on this brings the I quote it's good to hear this he fell asleep he asked became that way. What was Ra's law? Four things. Number one, if he left, number two, if he fell asleep, number three, if he used the bathroom, number four, if he was if sleeping is then two or four, the same thing is over. It's four. It's it's not four. It's three because sleeping is just a way of what's the difference between you because you went to work because you slept it's not sleeping is not considered for that reason. The reason a person is not allowed to fall asleep in his fillin is not because of the reason fall asleep in his fillain is. So the bottom line is like that the reason a that falls asleep has to again is because of it's something else. So what's the reason? Why can't you fall asleep? Or why if the falls asleep does he have to again I think that the reason sleeping is a problem is because it's if he left the because when a person falls asleep his leaves his body goes up to right we every morning we get on again but the nephesh itself when the person falls asleep leaves his body if it leaves his body it left it left there's says that's an issue. They say over that the used to say that he never believed that the of is the same as the until he saw says this is the one in the just to preface that by saying that in Brit they say that the brisk always had a on his table. said you walked into the bisc there was always a sitting there but regardless so the bisc tremendous for the lus and the of the but he said the one is this so why if the falls asleep does he have to again it's not because of that way it's go anywhere is that's going to be the issue that's the first the second just to end the on a light note and that is we're talking about the K. So the K is mentioned primarily in parishes but it's mentioned again in parishes. So when made the he made it from what mirror tells us the rest of the story they had mirrors they used the mirrors when they you know were wanted to look nice that's what they used the mirror fork and they were so willing to give up everything even their mirrors that they used to make themselves look beautiful even that they were willing to give away. But when got the mirrors, he didn't want to use them. He was might he was disgusted by them cuz they used for the went to and he said, "Take them." Because I actually like these mirrors more than everything else that was donated to the Mishkan. You know why? Because it was through these mirrors that there was 600,000 Jews that left because what were the men doing in they were concentration camps and they were tired? The women would go and they would bring food and water and they would give them to eat and they would take the mirrors and they would make themselves look beautiful with these mirrors and they would try to entice their husbands, give them a little and a little and through that they were able to in the husbands and it was in that way that they were able to have children. And that's why the rabbis, that's why 600,000 Jews left Mit. The men, they weren't really in a place to have those kinds of families. But it was all the women what they did. They fed their husbands. They gave them to drink. They gave them. And they used the mirrors to make themselves look beautiful and to entice their husbands. And that's how this all came about. That's the mar these are THE MILITARY FROM THE 600,000 JEWS that left what the mirrors because it was through the mirrors that they came about the was made from them why the is the because the k was made because the ma came from the m that's the rest of the story didn't want to take the mar he felt that it I'm befitting to use I like these mirrors more than anything else came out through the mirrors. I was just thinking one. So we have mirrors. What do we use the mirrors for? We use them for the care. Why do we use them for the care? Why the Kash says with the the was ultimately going to come from the K? So I was thinking maybe the and that is is that we mentioned that the K was different than all the other mikdash all the mikdash were used for the function of there was a that was done with the there was a was done with the there was a that was done with the there was a that was done with the there was no avoid that was done with the k what did the k do by the k washed his hands and feet he was himself he prepared himself so that he should be fit now to be able to do We said that's why the par the key is mentioned the parisha it's not mentioned in those are the parish that deal with the and the and then tucked away in parisa in the parish that talks about the eagle about the you have the parish of shabas and parisa that's the place that's paris what's the par doing there IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN A PARISH TRUMA WHY IS IT A pariso the ter is because the k was different than all the other caleb all the other [ __ ] were used by themselves for a k wasn't used for a k was used for a so I was thinking the woman's role in kai's role is very different than the man's role a woman doesn't count for a minion she doesn't count for she doesn't have the mitzvah of of she has her own role but at the same time even in the that the man does within his avoid there's a woman standing behind him cheering him on and supporting him because if a woman doesn't support a man then he's out of Right. Says the for taking care of their children, putting them on the bus, taking them off the bus, preparing food for them, taking care of all their physical needs that they need, allowing their husbands to go learn and and do what they need to do in that. They have a tremendous just one other says had a very difficult wife. He had a he had a hard shi his wife used to give him a very hard time stating that the says was always buying things for his wife. So Rab once told him why why you being so nice to your wife I mean you know she's not that nice to you quit proquo maybe you know so why you being so nice to her she said it's true she's she's not the finest of women but at the same time I have a to her for two things she raises my children she's the bottom line is I don't have her because I have because of my wife and for that in itself I have to go ahead and I have to be archetype. So the bottom line is yeah the man is maybe the primary participant in a he counts the minion but lamesa behind him there has to be a supportive woman because if there's no supportive wife behind him he's out of business the k represented not there was no avoid that was done with the k what was the k the k was the k needed in order for him to be able to do the k represented the that's what they Behind every great man, there's a great woman. Behind every great, there was a K. There had to be a K. Behind every you couldn't do the without the K. So where was the woman's contribution going to be most represented in the not in the she doesn't do the doesn't learn. She doesn't have a in the in the it's in the she's behind the scenes. That's what she does. She's the she's what allows it to happen. A that does the without going to the A that does the without going to the K the is going to be possible. For that reason, the woman is represented in the kar, not in one of the other caum the bas.