Zevachim 18

Today's is and we are on about 10 lines from the bottom the two dots. So we're moving along and came in the beginning of the second per and the theme is that as we're said and therefore bizarre the other and are avoid and as a result someone that's not a would not be able to do the avoid in fact if he does the avoid the aoid is going to be possible but the Mishna mentions other in addition to if the was done with the's left hand whether that would render the unfit or not regardless. So we have a Mishna that discusses the avoid and specifically who it is that would be considered possible to do the avoid in terms of what the definition of ple is that we spoke about this morning the of the mikt in perv where he discusses does ple mean that the avoid is as if it wasn't done but to the extent that practically it's possible to redo the avoid idea of culture that would be okay or maybe when we say ple it means more than that ple means that The carbon is now possible and as a result even if it would be possible to redo the and do it could be it wouldn't be okay meaning doesn't just means the mdash that it's as if the avoid wasn't done but you could redo it could be a positive right now the carbon's ple it's unfit and there's nothing you could do about it regardless the the garra methodically goes through each one of the mention in the we went through zar we went through we tried going through And now we're up to the next puzzle mentioned in the Mishna thankfully a lighter soul and that is a so we know that the had to wear when he did the head when he did the Mishna says that if the was wearing less than the or the was wearing less than that would render the how do you know that does the makes apostle said and some say it in the name of the it's based on the following the says how to wear they wore a hat and by wearing the begotten the affformentioned begotten the and the through that through that the is going to be a says the when the is wearing the he's considered a it's then that he has but if the is not wearing his he doesn't have if he doesn't have when he doesn't wear the bead then it's posh says that does the is going to be because to the extent he's not wearing the he's not a he's not a it means he's a we had a whole already that gave us the how you know that does the it's a says you want to know why is because when aim he has a vazar and if he has a dinner it's posh that it's going to be poss but is that the would seem at first glance to suggest a different how do you know that how do you know that a that drank over the limit how do you know if he does that is going to be ples the says that a that's and does he's a possib wants to know how you know that in addition to him being for doing the in this way how do you know that the itself is a poss says and if he does the in that state where he's going to be meaning itself is going to be so the price it says that's the possible the continues how do you know that that's or if he didn't wash his hands and feet from the and he does as well. We know from says what's the says the word by the big says and by the mitzvah that a has to wash his hands and feet before he does that. The says we have the word with regards to we have the word with regards to thus once we know that is going to be it's going to be possible. So too we know that is going to be the same thing but the price says how do you know that that's the part of this price that we need right now for our issues was only but the Reason that does is because a that's not a doesn't have he has a it's very nice but it's connect doesn't the same that the mar is we learn it from so the garra says it's true but really we need two because had we only had the mean I would have thought I would have thought that the only time is that uh that does the avoid avoid apostle that's if it's an avoid that if a or any other apostle for that matter would do the avoid he would be and the reason you would have thought that is because being that we're learning it from and in the context of the says that does the avoid so I would think that the only time you have this past in the avoid is if it's an avoid with in fact is going to be meaning the Tory says that then the says that through the of the parish of and that does the issu and in that parish of the said that I would think that the only time is if it's for which he would be thus I could only learn for that type of as well that is not for I would think that maybe there you don't have that is going to be possible that's why we have a second what's the second to tell me that if not wearing the begotten, he's not a kite. If he's not a kite, it doesn't matter what type of avoid he does. At the end of the day, he's always treated like a a zar that does the it doesn't matter if it's one of the for which is or if it's any other for that matter. Either way, the is that the is going to be possible. The obvious question is then once we have the of why do we need the bright? So the answer to that is going to become clear in the hemorrh. verse. So the Gomorrah mentioned this idea that there and then there are so what's the definition of a says if there are four that if or any other apostle for that matter would do the and what are they so throughout We've been talking about the we've been talking about the unique the four avoid that were done with the dam. The avoid is what's in the thus you always have the dollar avoidance. There's another these are the avoid that if a ple does those avoid such as any ple that does any one of these he's going to be meaning is not allowed to do any but there's a if a does these it's so that he's going to be and what are those it's a different this morning we spoke out with The garra mentioned and then the gumar said and the other 15. So the days is a list of 16. So you have the one of which is which by the way. Then you have the that apostles such as and you have plus the other 15 back to the envelope arithmetic 16 avoid that were done in general included in that is so that Bryce has a much looser a much broader definition of what exactly in a but regardless says the true there's a B says that aid is pos from from stated that still needed a new reason still had to tell me a new what was wrong with the first makar I'll tell you what was wrong with the first the first limited to and those are only for had I have was that a that's not wearing his begotten has a but the continues okay so which is an add-on to the tells me that when we say that doesn't just mean the that is for but it means all the question is how do you know that au that does the other that he is going to be meaning why would you have thought is limited to the because we're learning from and is mentioned in the context of and there's only by those but for we have another to tell me that the will be possible even if it's one of the other because when a he has a okay that's true from nobody says that a that's inebriated or intoxicated or driving over the limit all of a sudden he doesn't have he doesn't have a so we need now to tell me that is going to be possible even if it's not one of the says once I know now I could learn from but the says That wasn't the reason that the Bryce gave meaning if you're going to tell me that I can learn from so then why do I now need the of meaning was a to tell me that is going to be possible and then it says so we're being the with the word to tell me that if someone does but now that you're telling me that I know that all can't do and if he does I know that for and I have that allows me to learn from so why then did the Bryson need the what's teaching me so the that mentioned was before it knew the but once it knows the we don't need anymore it's not necessary cuz now I could learn from but the garra says the itself when it mentioned still learned from so you want to tell me the original time was before the bry before the tan knew the shava it's writing the bryce in real time so to speak HE DOESN'T NOW ALL OF a sudden the T knows. Okay, I'll I'll buy that. But the problem is when the introduces how does it use not to learn from to learn from from says the that's true. If you read the BA the way we have it, but really that's not the way you're supposed to read the BA. The way you read the is not teaching me that if he does is going to be possible from because the is a very limited all I would know is the so the says I have to come on to a new what's the and the says like we spoke out once you know you don't need anymore. In fact, not only don't you need from you can learn from and say you have to learn from anyways. Why do you have to learn from anyways? Because itself only teaches me the how would I know and I'd only know it from so what's in the B. So the Ber seems to have a and learn. That's true. If you read the price the way we have the way you read the price as follows. The price off the bat said you want a pos. I'll give you a says and it says between the word and the teaches is going to be. Now it's true. It's a very limited only for the that but I have that at that point the Tana didn't know the then the Tana became aware of oh once it became aware of then the T said once you have it's already a game changer now I can tell you that we can learn from and once we learn from I'll know not only the but in fact I'm going to know all the I when you read the price it Doesn't the BC seem to be learning from not the other way around? Yeah, that is the way the BRC seems to read. But for that says we have to edit the BC so to speak and we have to clarify exactly what the BR mean. So the bottom line is how do I know that? I know it from I know it. How do I know that does? I learned it from the of I doesn't the B say from that was before I knew about but in the same breath the B mentioned there's like a before and after in the BC itself once it knows you don't need that anymore. says, "So what then is why did the right says the ra is coming to teach me something that used to observe the used but he wouldn't the reason is because there's a mitzvah to eat there's to drink and Rab used to drink wine. Once Rav drank wine, Rav felt that he wasn't in a place of to be able to pass in chilas and he wanted to get up in D. Rav didn't want to pass in and therefore Rav felt that when he was in a state of and the reason was how did Rav know that what was Rav's to say if you drink wine you have to stay away don't pass. So it's not teaching me it's not a this is more of a that's important for rabbis to know that if you're under the influence can't pass because you have to be in a in a clear state of mind in order to be able to pass either way. So what's the then is going to be possible it's the says I have another it says so The PK describes that the Bahar had a mitzvah to put wood on the and then to light a fire that had to be a fire in order to do the all the now the P says and the Gmorra is bothered. We know that was a so why does it have to say the he has to be what does that mean that if the was wearing the clothing of the and he did the that the emphasis is he's wearing his royal garb he's wearing his big but if he wasn't wearing his big he doesn't have a what's he says come to teach me that that was wearing big day. This is already he's wearing big. He's just not wearing his big kuna. He's not wearing the he's wearing the still is going to be have a over here that is not allowed to do the say because had we only had the first I would have thought that it's true but then maybe that's only for that's that had to be done the way Rashi explains it is that putting fire on the was a Rashi quotes because was on the anyways. So it really wasn't necessary for the to go and facilitate a fire cuz the fire was there regardless. it was. So had we not had a special in this I would have thought that maybe the only time you have this is if it's that has to be that mean doesn't do it no one's going to do it but this where it's coming anyways maybe that's a you don't have that no that's not even such an where is anyways coming it doesn't matter Mubis brings fromu as a nice maybe the first is telling me that that's not wearing big at all is going to be possible. this price said the price said and we made the is that even though the god's wearing big day but being that it's the big day not the big day that's enough for to be possible but maybe there's a kadesh maybe the first tells me that if a kayen would walk in he's wearing regular clothing that an ordinary person wears but maybe a despite the fact that he has a but if he's wearing maybe that's enough maybe that's a I hear but if you look in the original and then it says so the mentioned so this is going on and vanov meaning all the andarin So you see clearly that is true for and it's true for the I have a third it says it's talking about the carbon that had to be so there was hatchet and then they would take all the and they would put it on the and there too it says again is and it teaches me the same. So this teaches me a third. What would be if the where's the of the he walks in with the with this tells me that that's also going to be possible. Why do I need another? Why wouldn't I know that if he's wearing more begam it should be possible just like if it's soar gives the answer so I would have thought if he's missing a bag that's possible but how do you know if he has an extra bag of that makes him possible as well that even in that case he's going to be possible to if the was big kahuna and the big day kahuna were too long says they were sleing on the ground was simply too or they were too short. Rashi says they were removed from the ground simply because they were too short. If they were old, they were worn out and did with any one of the affformentioned scenarios. He was wearing big but either they were too long or they were too short or they were worn out. It doesn't disqualify the is going to be cautious. What's the says and we know says that the big had to be custom fit. They had to be tailor made to fit it perfectly. So you would think if it's too long or if it's too short. So the cayenne is violating this of so maybe that should make it possible. It's true. is apparently it says it once maybe not twice. We have to see maybe but the bottom line is it's avah and being that it's a mitzvah. So therefore it's not that's the B continues what if was wearing two pairs of pants or if he was missing a bag or he had an extra bag or he had a wound and he put a bandage on his wound is or if the were dirty or they were torn and he did over there the is already going to be possible. So any one of these cases the is going to be possible. So if he's wearing two he's has an extra bag or he's missing a bag. So that was the and we saw doesn't just mean but it means as well. you're missing. You have one begged too little or one begged too much. Either way, the is it's going to be possible. Additionally, if he has a wound, it's possible. Rashi says cuz that's going to be a between his body and the beodum and it wasn't allowed to be a and finally if the big day kuna were dirty or if the big day kahuna were torn and he did the is going to be puzzle. Why is he going to be puzzled in that case? It's a very important rational. We'll get back to that soon with the raid because when the Tyra talks about the big it says it was it was supposed to be royal and if the clothing are to be dirty and clothing going to be torn it's not and as a result it's a this is then it has to be tailor made no that's a fit perfectly but if it's a little too long it's a little too short it's not the end of the world but that's and that's if it's dirty or if it's torn it's going to in the name of if the big were too long it's going to be if it's too short it's going to be apostles again the said if the were too long says shleing on the ground too short doesn't it have to be made to tailor but it's okay it's going to be caution that's a brym said if it's too long if it's too short it's going to be possible not allowed to argue with a price how could say that if it's too short it's possible doesn't the price say if it's too short it's too short and the price is too short with two different when said that if it's too short it's possible he meant if it's literally too short if the beggar is too short, his pants don't come to his his ankles, wherever it's supposed to go to. So, uh, whatever's in style. So, then it's going to be ple if it's physically too short, it's going to be ple when the says, it's talking about where really the pants fit perfectly. Some you wear a belt, you wear gle, your pants come up a little bit. So now it's too short, but it's too SHORT BECAUSE OF THE AD OVER THERE. The is it's going to be cautious. If it's too short then the is it's going to be that's what went when he said I the says the Bryce is talking about where it's continues said both if it's too short too long and if it's too short in either case it's going to be possible so the explains was once Giza that's a place and he was staying in some inn and one of the people that was in the inn came over to Rafa he noticed him he recognized him and he told him I have a sh I heard the name of that said so he asked how could say that he asked in the just as told him that's that's not a Rami Bakama, you should have known Rami Bak's ter said there's two types of short pants. There's pants that are really too short. That's possible. That's what was talking about. When the braces says too short is kosher, it's talking about really it fits. But when the wears slaps the pants up a little bit, it's only in that case that it's going to be cauter. But in but really it fit. But he told them back. But I heard that Rav said that and are both Apostle now the Bryer said they're both kosher. He said if you're going to tell me he tells Rafa my says it means meaning we have to answer not only we have to answer mush as well. So for we had an answer we had Ramy Bak's ter but we need to answer Rav's in Musham. Rav said Miralam is possible. The Bryce said is cautious. It says the gum maybe Rafa said that we're going to answer Rav in a similar way to the way we answer when the Bry says that is it means that really was too long but he's wearing a g and being that he's wearing a g it pushes it up a little bit. Now that it pushed it up a little bit. So when he wears it, it's not too long and it's for that reason it's when Rav said it's talking about even after the or it's it's too long and in that case it's going to be meaning the same methodology we're going to be between so that's the way we're going to answer the that's the way we answer the said you're going to answer the as well meaning of why is because although it's too long and if it's too long it's possible but has a to be made as a to somehow cut the pants and make it so that although it's too long but being that with the it's okay the problem you can't have your cake and eat it too why because we said to answer Miss that I look at the pants we they are batsome are they If they're too short, it's a problem. If they're too short only because of the the GTO, that doesn't bother me. What I care about is what they are. And now you're telling me just the opposite. You're telling me that if they're too long, but with the gau they're okay. That's when it's going to be. So to answer the steer, you're telling me that what matters is what the pants are. As long as they fit, even if they're too short with the gar, I don't care. It's still going to be caution. And you're TELLING ME JUST THE OPPOSITE to answer you're telling ME THAT NO I could look at the way it is with the and if it's too long but the makes it okay then it is going to be okay. So you can answer but you answer you can't use the this methodology of to answer because you're going to end up with a said the way you have to understand Rab was saying something else said the way Rab understood the again the says and are both kosher he understood it as follows it's one It's not two and because if that's the case these two would contradict his two and wasn't although he's allowed to argue with a but he never intended to argue with a so the way he must have understood the was in fact what is is of so that although itself is possible and itself is ple but if you have the and now the it fits perfect the is we look at as if it somehow cuts the pants it tailor the pants somehow and as a result that becomes the size and if that becomes the size it's going to be cautious according to rav if it's too long it's possible if it's too short it's also possible why I this braceer too long and too short a kasher it's not two cases it's one case and what it means is is that if it was too long but it was cut it was cut not as the second case but and in that case it's going to be if the was wearing his and they were too long the pants for example were too long is iter or is it possible that definitely the theme of the last said I think it's a we learned in Not a braer that discusses the laws of but rather a discusses the laws of again another classic example of is going to literally go to another part of to try to help us out here a little bit. It says so there's a mitzvah of we know the parish of the parish of we say in but we also have there's another it says that where do you put the where do you put the say you put them on the four corners of the bag means only if the bag has four corners. But not if the beggar has three corners. Maybe the way you're supposed to read the P is if it has four corners, not five corners. Meaning a beggar that has three conflicts. There's no it says why? Because it says four. Four and not three. Maybe the is not four and not three, but rather is four and not five. When it says those words are extra why does it have to say it's coming to be what's it coming to it's coming to so it says maybe aggro how do I know to be agg that has five corners and to be a beggar that has three corners. Maybe if I can maybe say that is coming to me that has three I'll tell you why it makes sense to be five. Why? Because is so if the criteria to have a is there has to be when you have you have conf however I'm going to be a bag that has only three conf because over there when you only have three so you don't have four the brings So the first price is said meaning the beet has to have dollar conf there to be of but if the begg has three conf there's no what if it has five convoys as the if it has five convoys there is going to be of at the same time the garra says another that says it doesn't matter if it has three Or if it has five either way, it's this might have or is there not what's maybe the is the says you have to have four confidence. What if I have more than four? What if I have five? Does the extra bother me or does it not bother me? Is it commanding me? Do I see what's extra? So I see five and not four. Thus or no I say I have to have four. I have four. I got to have four plus one. But the plus one is command is as if it's not even here cuz I don't need it. So being that I don't need it. It's if it's not here. So what does it have to do with our same sh is wearing the fit. It just so happens it's too long. So that extra part that's too long. Is it command or is it command? I could argue he has enough material. Well, he has what he needs. He rather has more. Okay, that's like the so if the big kahuna were shim they were too long it's going to be just like the we see it as a beg and the extra is command. So so too with regards to the biguna I look at the begot as if it fits the and what's extra what's more is command but according to the says and then no you don't look at five as being four plus one that's command five is not four just like three is not four so just like the be would be too short it would be a problem if the gmor be if the beaver would be too long it' be a problem as well so it says the gar maybe this shila of big kahuna they weren't cut not even with a whether it's a shouldn't be told in that says I could tell you could be in everybody holds that just like four is not three four is not five so just like big duna that are too short are possible big duna that are too long are not possible either you don't say if you're wearing something that's two sizes too big yeah I understand but it's just it's still not going to be the coveted is you're not going to look very good. So the point is really in you don't say what's the sh over there what's that says that even though it says still is okay what do you mean the price already said it's learned from a says the price that holds that it's and it's The other price had a reo from what is the time of that price to do with the says that the only time there's a if it's a bag that you can physically see that is worn at night where people cannot see there's no even if the bag is a dollar still there's no Maybe not. Maybe it's what's and says maybe we should be. So the says makes more sense because even though the himself the one wearing the he doesn't have the but everybody else that season has nobody could see being that it's that night it's nobody could see it. It makes more sense to be Dr. The man that uses to teach me that a bag that has five corners is so he doesn't have to teach me that is how then does that know that he learns it from because could have said the word is extra. So in I have two I have one limma to tell me five corners and I have another limma to tell me that and that used to teach me because he holds that if it has five conflicts it's excluded. So what's the second that he learns from aren't there two drases? The T one T had two number one five corners and number two. So this number that doesn't hold that if you have five corners. So he used it just to be what's the second she doesn't think there's two over here. It says you're telling me there's an extra because of the word. No Asher is not asha. As a result all you have is one exhale. It's just a little bit of rate. So we discussed the of mentioned in the Mishna as one of the where the iso is would be possible. What's the it says And we learn from there when the is wearing his big he has a but when he's not wearing his big day at those times he doesn't have a den of a kay the only time a kayen is considered a kayen is when he's wearing big duna when he's not wearing bigun he has a d of aar oh if he has a d of aar he doesn't have a of a kayen then it's posh why the is that the is going to be possible because for that we had already a whole that is that does the is going to be possible asks and so the context over there is a that mentions people that one of the things mentioned the is that while he was in a state of says no how do you know The says, "And we learn from there." So the says very a related to the that we just learned that just like you see that does the possible. Why? So does the he's also going to be by definition is if he's if he does the other he's going to be why because then is going to be well brings the from Rabakov to Orleans. One of the balas he said it's a plea to me the needs a how I know again but how I know that it's a it's a it's says the context over there is the big has to make sure that he wins the begotten him when he enters the or when he goes to the says the and if he does that heard he won't have an and he won't die the says that if the is going to do what he's supposed to do specifically he's going to wear his big when he does the then he's not going to It's clearly that if he went with the big also known as he doesn't understand it's a why does to tell me that it's very nice it's I don't need that releans that the em is that that is in the context of the biguno But it's actually talking about a specific begg says that you should make for the that was one of the one of the one of the the next has to make sure to be wearing his has to be wearing his pants when he does the and if he's not wearing the so then is going to be so says from the itself all I know is that if the does the without wearing the then the is going to be but how about the other that I don't know what if he wasn't wearing his what if he wasn't wearing the what if he wasn't wearing the how do I know if he does then he's going to be says well for that already I need the course from the says that's if you Look one earlier it's talking about the said would have been to say that the mention is referring to the the question is why why would I think that the should be any difference I saw says he says in the beginning of par when the introduces the big so the says the purpose of the big was these were royal garments and and the purpose of them were to make the coin look good. Matter of fact, if you look at the Ramban says if they're going to wear these special clothing, they're going to be comparing the to the He's supposed to look like a he's supposed to be in a state of because the big the royal guard says something unbelievable. He says that the kings in the time of the terra used to wear these and that's why the instructed the and the to wear these unbelievable wouldn't say such a thing but that's what says the purpose of these were that's where the kings used to dress it was true with regards to what does the say about the purpose of the wasn't the purpose of the was simply because the coin wouldn't be wearing then his would be exposed with the purpose. So if he doesn't wear the he's doing the so I would have thought but if the wore he just didn't wear he wasn't dressed like a king okay he was dressed like LIKE A WELL-DRESSED MAN BUT NOT LIKE A MEL HE WASN'T HE WASN'T ON that level so maybe that wouldn't be enough to say that he's the But if he's not wear doesn't have he has the first the second is a is a very mar and that is this is in the in the end of so the if you want to look it up it's he brings as follows there was a story with the kayaken. So was the god and there was a that was pouring water for and one of me were there and this turns to he says I don't understand that if somebody is he benefits from a he uses for his own personal benefit it's like he's a how could you tell his have from told him today and being that this wasn't wearing his big didn't have if he didn't have kadusha there's no doesn't apply but the continued call so he shouldn't have any you shouldn't give him the first He shouldn't he shouldn't have anything that he needs his in order to have then he shouldn't have any at all says didn't say anything he was quiet he was stumped by this Peter was there and he said no it's true you have to say but at the same time it's Okay. The Reb is the Rebi has a right to benefit from this. I I thought and you're telling me even this man when there's no begotten reason is because he has a right to be and he brought a and it's the reason that that's going to be okay. A very interesting exchange over here between chimes in where initially that it could be the don't apply his so even though it's true he says is a problem. Yeah, but that's all true if it's big day. But being that today ain't big day, but the T can't be because if that's the case, then there's no sense. The whole of a is is ble today because there's no big day was quiet. He didn't answer. Him didn't respond and had a get up and say no, the reb has a right because the has a right to be. So when he decided this to be he had a right to be on his brings this and he discusses it a lot. That's interesting. This morning we mentioned and that's the was not supposed to. We spoke it out specifically because says anointing. What was the bas? one of the other it's one of the 16 avoid so we said it's one of the also one of the 20 it's the 25th is not allowed to do the that's the high time shouldn't be able to either it's not true about that so we spoke out some then we spoke out in the raid discusses why is The meaning of the iss that they don't do because you be in a good place in order to and then we're not in a good place. We don't we don't feel it. When do we feel it? Only by the end of that's when you start feeling the a little bit and that's why. So that was this is the very last says I quote unless he was the is this initially said that maybe it's okay but it's not possible said hey you could There's an idea that you can be. So the asks it's not really our but the ask from the days doesn't have a right to be. So the question is could he be or could he not be that's meaning this is that a could be he could be with a if he's on his bas the problem is you have to say as follows the reason that in the mentions which is brought down is there was different because The clay was having an was that he was being mishamisha. He was serving the god. Who wouldn't take advantage of an opportunity to pour to a glass of water for he was yakenu? If the has he has a right to bear that says that a can't be he doesn't have a right to be that's talking about where he doesn't have is he having or is he not having says if that's the case you could understand why didn't answer for himself what Peter answered didn't know this rau pet knew And didn't know. But what was going to say? What do you mean? Of course, I'm allowing him. He's having a He's serving me. Says he didn't want to suggest as if when it comes to me, this is not gonna fly. And then the says I'm going to tell you flying all over the place. Now from all places the context over there is somebody lent somebody money. We know there's an what if there was a mashkin. So it's a big problem for the malva to eat the mashkin. So ruin lent shim $1,000 shipment post collateral. It's a field that is worth $1,000. So far so good. The field is isoparis. The malva right now has the field in his possession. Could he eat the paris? Could he not eat the paris? A very big problem because if he's going to eat the pis you're running into major ribbus issue stating that there is a way where the malva could eat the pis. It's called the mashkanto very not us right now. So we're not going to go into it. The basic concept is is when a certain amount of the loan gets amortized every year, if it's a fixed amount every single year, then allow to pay us stating that says the only type of but when it comes to even if should be he should be he shouldn't eat the pay even from the all the way on the bottom of the says as follows would lend money he would take and he would eat the parisuchi he had a different meaning he would lend money have he wouldn't eat what's going on over here it's a how Raven have eaten it. was and this good was true only for says is not allowed to eat from so how could eat wasn't ra says this doesn't bother me not even a little bit you know why I understand perfectly I understand perfectly what was didn't think it is I know this is not supposed to I'm not saw it with such a why wouldn't be by because he said who am I it's he need to come up on his behalf and explain what was going on. No, you didn't think that this was having enough or from serving me. Who am I that he should have enough from serving me? What we see from this with this with this light raid is a we see that this of again was unbelievable with Ramban says that's the way the used to dress back in the day. But it's ideas when it comes to the there's even an idea of but there's a big what's the and we have two number one we have that we learn from that's the we have the says that why one of the however wanted to apply it not only when it comes to that was discussing something that related to but you have to know it's a big wanted to apply it even outside the context of the that maybe a that's not wearing the biguno has a dinner vazar I