Zevachim 113

Today's isim and we are five lines from the top of the learn and so yesterday we began the 14th and final per of which we saw picks up very much as a continuation of the 13th par and that is dealing with the laws of now the first of the was if somebody would bring the or meaning outside of the place that it was supposed to be brought he would be from the laws of because The says and we know this. Only time a person's for doing an is if he did the with a carbon that was the was not brought it was brought on the wasn't brought it was brought in the midbar as a result these two things are not so despite the fact that they have a that the designates where you're supposed to do the if you do it from that they're not included in the of today's is going to discuss this first we're going to talk about the then we're going to talk about the now the daf is not proportionate because 98% of the daf is going to talk about the paras the remaining few points are going to talk about the hamish Another anomaly of today's daf, there's a digression. You don't get that every day in kachen. The digression is actually type digression. But first, we're going to roll our sleeves up a little bit and the Garra is going to discuss. It's interesting if you look back at the Mishna. There seemed to have been two gis that the had. What the Mishna even says the way we have it is Rashi says that the proper is you take a look at says. So some others would truth is that it really is just a matter of semantics because of course they're both true. or is going to be because the says which is something that governs the laws of the is of it's just interesting depending on the is this in or is this either way what does it even mean when we talk about the being brought away from its proper place. What is the place? What is the that the had to be brought in that were even having a conversation? What would be in the event that you brought in? Meaning when we learn what does mean it always meant outside the but these were things that were not brought in the anyway. So what's the definition the first means that the avoid of the parad was done not in a place that had been inspected to make sure that there was no caver there were no mason that it was tar. So one of the is of the is that had to be brought in a place that was tar. We'll see more about that says the t of is it wasn't done in a that's the proper place would have had to have had a proper there was no that's the maybe it should be subject to the laws of that it's not said and he told him can't be called there's no place in that's That's not that is no there. So there's no such physical place of element said I'll give you an example of what the means where the clearly going with the gear or if you want to go with the gear of again it's just semantics but where the parad was brought inside the line because that's the it says that the paratuma had to be brought outside we know it was brought on now didn't have to be brought on mish But it did have to be brought outside and you want to know it was done. Why did have to say that it's talking about where the was done could have made it different. He could have said it's talking about where it was done outside. However, it wasn't done. Now we know that the of the had to be done. Now we're not talking about the we're talking about the or if you have the ga we're talking about the but let's go with our we're talking about the stating that says that it's that is that just like the of the so the had to be as well how do we know that because wasn't connect. And then the says the two had to be done. So we see already that said that okay but who said holds that you'll tell me maybe it's true that it's not we're going to read the parenthesis if says it's because of this that has to be like has to be said it's why because when The talks about the says he doesn't buy into the also what would be if the of the was again it was says it's possible said it's says it's possible because after it says it says and then it says so when And just like the has to be so also says it's going to be the reason is because the says means the excrement of the animal but wherever it's killed wherever the is that's where you could do this and holds that there's no that has to be also doesn't have to be. But what do you see from this? That just like said also said it. And by the way, he said it sard and he said it regarding the if that's the case. What did say now? Why is this and not also didn't make that? He said it's because clearly holds that if you would do it because only the has to be but doesn't have to say that could have been says answer that is true could have would have and even should have said that stating that he wanted to bring out a that's would be satisfied if it was because in that case if anything if you're doing it outside of your and it's not connected you're actually in a sense being from the where it's supposed to be. So that's that would be considered is that even if you're doing it inside we're over there you're actually being if that's the case I would have thought maybe that's what wanted you to know that even if it's that too that would also be considered in other saying is could have said that means that it was outside almost like he wanted you to know that even if it's where it's you would have thought maybe that's not really is but the truth is there's two definitions that could be satisfied with either it's or it's gave two said either or it was outside but the truth is what say sounds a little bit like this is a mush of what it could be, but maybe there's a another of what it could be. He didn't say he said because that emerges from the there actually is another of how it could play itself out. But the bottom line is means two different things. Why not like so he told us we don't have to guess called because what do you mean it wasn't in a whole obviously is of the opinion that is not that's the more right pondering what is the husband Sounds pretty fundamental according to is not according to it is what is the says hold that the descended upon added he said that they both formulated their positions from the same it's says the as follows. The is talking. Are you not? What did the waters actually land on the day of the m? They didn't. And as a result, of course, you're meaning are you going to tell me that you're certainly that's not the case for says just the opposite. The is not talking but he's learning the why you making the whole fancy over here. You read the way you're supposed to read the you're not tired. You know why? Because did the rain not affect you just like it affected everywhere else? But the bottom line is the traces itself all the way back to almost the beginning of time to the if the affected then you have to assume that there's going to be different components of human beings that are going to be shak in the of the land and as a result you can't just assume is right this now you have to worry about all these in as opposed to according to there was noble to assume that there's dead corpses and bodies oh the holes based on there was no marble in so if there was no marble in this is definitely not something that you would have to worry about so the now this is going to be good of the from here literally until the end of the is going to have some back and forth between and trying to prove their respective position s the did go to the didn't go to gets the first crack at it asked the following question. This question that he asked is from a Mishna that we haven't seen together recently but it's an often quoted Mishna should sound somewhat familiar. There were certain courtyards in the holy city of Jerusalem and they were built on top of rock that they were able to determine traced itself back all the way to Shish the beginning of time underneath the rock they made sure that there was a little bit of a gap meaning between it and the grand underneath it because they wanted to be 100% sure that there was no caver underneath. Okay, so we know this is a 101 that if there's a caver and then there's a little bit of a a gap or even of space between the kev and somebody that's on top of it, it's mik. So if someone's mah on top of that, there's not going to be a problem. So they took this huge cell, they built aer on top of it. underneath it there had to be a little bit of a so like this there's 100% sure that nobody's being mal on top of any they were being pregnant women there the would give birth there and they would raise their children for several years seven eight years the and the purpose of raising the kids in this way was for the avoid of the because we wanted to make sure that these kids were 100% pure they can be involved they can engage in the of okay now when it came time to take water for the for the would bring and they would put doors on top of these ax and the children would sit on top of these doors and they were holding made of wear they would go to the place that they were supposed to get the water from and they would go and they would bring it back. This was all done to make 100% sure that there was going to be no trace, no ounce of that in any way was going to penetrate the avoid of the parad. So think about what they do. Number one, they built a in a place where they're making sure there's going to be no issues. Additionally, they literally have women give birth to children there that are never going to leave this place. So like this is giving no that they're going to be. And even when they had to leave, they had to go off grounds because they had to go to a specific place to go get the water. They sat on top of like this. They're not going to be mal and maybe someone's going to fall out a little bit on the side. They have dice over there. The use which has a unique status of the laws of so it was done with such a but look he says I don't understand if you're going to tell me the entire so why we making ourselves so crazy. So why are you so worried about ah you see it's not so positive if it's not so passionate that means you have to be so when I hold means I'm saying good I must be right of he answered on behalf of he said really this whole over here was a this is like a that's what this was because really this is not something you would have to worry about. But went out of their way to make of what's the hes in this? So we know the hes it's because one of the was that they used to be yeah they were then he would go to the would be at and that's when he would do it. It was being that they used to go out of their way to be so they felt they had to counter it. They had to have some balance of power. So the way they countered it was by making all these. But the bottom line is chalk this up as one of these irrational that you find. There's nothing you can spar from here. Now's turn who holds that did not go to the dead from the following. This is one time the were in the is one of the chambers, one of the rooms in the mikdash and they found human bones and they got very nervous. They said maybe the whole is you know we always took for granted that was taught maybe we got it wrong. This must have been from Yeshua is talking right? So Yeshua got up and he said, "Wouldn't it be a that we should decide that the may and then he said I'll prove to you I don't have to worry about I'll prove to you that is you know why because otherwise people would find the me actually says in they used to find the me how come we don't find me anywhere in how come you don't find the meim all the corpses of must be IT'S BECAUSE IT'S SO if it's you don't have to worry about it from the fact that said wasn't he trying to say that the m never fell there because if the m was there you would find the me is his way of saying that the m was never there but the gurus says right it's hard to even articulate the gasha because the comeback is so obvious and by the way not only Is the comeback so obvious? We'll see the Gar is going to have this is not an this is actually an which it actually sounds a little bit more like but first just following through with according to you going to tell me that weren't there? Of course they were there. So what then did Yeshua mean when he said the point he was trying to make was that was always under scrutiny and the always made sure to keep it in a state of tyrant. That's because we're almost questioning our forefathers. Of course they all did the right thing but the bottom line is the mason were there here too. They were here and the zas they must have gotten rid of it. But says the if you're going to tell me that even is going to concede that Yeshua says that the me and the were they were removed then every place is means the was never there. was there but good. But at the end of the day this was talking about over there it was but was from the rest and the of the was outside. As a result, outside Jerusalem, there is a musk of a makabik and a notab. Some had this affformentioned exchange like we just said, not asking the but the other way that so according to this got the first word and he got the second word, right? He asked the first he even asked the second right those were the words of Yeshua might laugh. Doesn't it sound a little bit what was trying to say? do worry that there might be think about the me and the mason they should have been there where are they must be and that's for sure by the mason it's probably for sure also when it comes to the even if it's a little bit more like at least seems that way but it's not so whether it's at the end of the day There is no raya one way or the other from this price a third. Now who is the we'll have to wait to see the but if you look in the union they bring it's another that is asking and this is already going to be from that actually talk about the marble the says what does it sound like every single human being that lived on dry land died. So he said according to me that's why every single person died even in the why did the people in die. So again is saying it's for sure saying the everybody died. We can argue if the Mabel was there, the Mabel wasn't there. But that every human being died, that the only people alive when his wife, his sons, and their wives dead. Everybody knows Kar every child knows that no one said that there was that were living in Of course they weren't. There's no such cuz that's a isn't that the biggest in the world to me. What else is the reason that all the people in would have died? Wasn't my gay all of a sudden? They must have died because of the marble. This is the biggest ria ever says the but according to you why did they die and for the you want to know why they died said not because the m was but they died because of the heat of the boiling water that was the water of the m how do we know that the water of the m was boiling said this The was it was and as a result they were punished in that'sak that's boiling how do we know that meaning what's the is there rem the answer is yes the says this is already after the marble it says what does it mean so I'll tell you what it means specific it says by the mill And what does it mean over there that the anger of the king cooled down that means means it also cooled down the coo down that it must have been very very hot before meaning it was here's the point on the reason the or the people I should say died it was because of the he was because there was so much heat in the world some global warming of sorts that caused them to die said according to that the m So the people in died for the same reason the people in the rest of the world died. According to there was no mit. So why then the people in died? It wasn't mas but the reason they died was mas. Either way this is the first version of this exchange between where it's what was the call. So it certainly sounds like the must have been had in the reverse. This too was said according to me that the never descended in it's for that reason. So I understand the word what does it mean? So it's referring to there was dry land but according to you my there was no dry land. Why? Because the entire world was consumed by water. Meaning in this is proving that there must have been a place in the world that was dry because the says it must have been that there's dry land. They died anyways. Why they died? But the bottom line is there's of dry land according to you that the entire world is submerged in water. There's no what does it mean? It means the land that had been previously dry but now it's not. Why is the P go out of its way to say the reason we're going out of our way to tell us is to tell you there was an area that was dry because according to say the place that was once dry must be somehow it's not the regular way to talk should have said everybody died. So why are you telling me the word also like that? It was only the people that had previously lived on dry land that were included in the of the but not so everyone that had previously lived on dry land as opposed to the dog. Either way, this concludes the third exchange between and again whether it's or whether it's another this is it seems to be doing the talking. It's not an exchange between it's a in the but doesn't sound like they're talking to each other as far as their exchange. So we had these three different uh things that they brought up right from the fact that they went so far out of the way by the and etc. Sounds like there are places that are not. We had that referring to Is that a is that the marble was never there or that's a right that the was there? Those were the the two and then on the one hand sounds a little bit like the for sure was init that's the but then again it also sounds like there was a place that remained dry the entire time. That's the gears of but that's their exchange. Now the gmor is doing what the bishop that holds that the never descended on. And we could put a name to the face. Who's that? I understand how there could be aim. So the reaim is one of the mythical creatures that is discussed in Tanakha. It was the unicorn above my pay grade. But in our what we're going to see is that whatever the was it was very very very very very big. So the gar says like this that the did not descend in that there was a post the marble how it was init but according to the holds that the marble did descend on which means it descended everywhere in the world so how did the survive the marble what do you mean maybe it survived together with all the animals too big says thear too It's impossible. The elephant, the giraffe, the hippopotamus, they survived. But the is physically too big. There's no mit. There's no way in the world that it could have survived the marble. And after the cactus must be arrived, there was a place where there was no marble. If there was a place that there was noble maybe it survived in that place. Oh says no right said maybe and that is that the was all over the world maybe they brought baby res. So you're thinking they brought these massive resur right the guri these are the gur res. So maybe what that's what they brought but the is not going to work. You know what Barbaran Rabbar said and if this sounds familiar because this takes us back to the beginning of this is one of the travels the life of times of those it actually is an excerpt from and that's what you said I saw a baby it was so young it was one day old it was the size of mount The kamav you want to know how big is it's arbon pari it's 40 par the length of its neck was a pari was three para marb the area that it would need to have in order for it to put its head down was para was a par and a half as a matter of fact this baby went to the bathroom and the whole Jordan River boom all of a sudden it was completely stuffed the whole thing was was completely clogged. What do you see from here? Even the baby raim is so so big. Now, it's quite interesting because we're in the middle of a it's an aada to dig a discussion, but it's like a discussion, right? And we're telling Suana with Rabbi Abra. I mean, if there's anything we remember from going through those gumar, it's a big tombo whether those gar are meant to be taken literally. They're not meant to be taken literally. The guy wrote a famous pish on that. Here we're bringing the of that into a which is an interesting sidebar but the bottom line is the answered and said that what must have happened was is that the head of the was put in the and that's how it was able to survive. So the m was everywhere. How did the raim survive? First the gamar thought they were baby raims. That's not the terrets. The terret says it was only the head. Maybe it was a baby's head. But the bottom line is it was only the head and that's how it survived. But the Gmorra says even the head is too big. We did the math. The marb is part of the by the way just to state the obvious. What's the kasha head fit in? It's because we know the dimensions of the right. We know exactly what it was. This is way way way too big. And even the head if the go was too big. Soar says what it means is not the head but it means the the spits of its nose something out the word depends on how big the nose was but the bottom line is it was just the nose that was why the nose it's like this would be able to breathe through the nose but all it was was the nose but the says I don't understand just one thing who just said this this was talking's coming to defend how theim could survive if you hold that was true. We're intellectually honest. Just because it would help him doesn't necessarily mean, oh, let's make believe doesn't happen like this. I'm going to win the argument. Maybe that's how we roll. But that's not the way are going through this. But ask another says they still don't understand it. So basically you're telling me you have this this massive creature his nosemanl is stuck inside a hole of the ta for a long time by the way and the marble's going up and down this current I mean talk about a roller coaster right I mean that's a a ride if you've ever been on one but the bottom line is there's no way I could survive this I'm a rich luckish and this is already rich luckish I had to defend luck you're on your own here I'm not defending you for this came he defended he said the ta that what it did was it took its horns and it lodged it into the ta so the horns must be very big so it's it stuck to the he's able to breathe cuz his nose is inside the that's how it was able to survive another catch said what happened to the boiling hot water right it should have burnt and disintegrated everything remember from the it's a long time ago the empire If you remember from the learn how everything disintegrated talks about but how was it able to survive the soar says that's your I mean how did the ta survive the forget about the it was hanging on for dear life but how did the t itself survive ask you another everyone knows survived the marble had it survived the I mean now you know the rest of the story he is hanging out with the raim. But the bottom line is they spent a year together. But he's right next to him. So if that's the case, how did he survive? What do you have to say? There was a miracle that happened to them. They must have gotten cool from the means the itself remained because otherwise there was no way it would have survived and they hung on to the sides of the ta and that's how they were able to survive. Either way, at first glance from the fact that this would seem to support the must have been in during the but says after further review there's no it could be really the survived the m how would it have survived the m it's way too big it doesn't with the dimensions of the tava you have to say that his nose was inside the tava his horns were lodged into the etherin The city was very very cold and it even cooled him off. But the asks one final even though we'll make this that went but the people didn't stay in how do we know that himself said why is called literally means the depths. Because all the me they roll down there. Why was called me? Because all the me ended up getting to over there. But the bottom line is we need not clearly holds that all the me ended up in what's the cash is said. Right. Let's come uh back to where we started. What's the type of and the explained it's holds that there is a is because he holds that the wasra even if the was himself said that all the me ended up in the it's true but he actually it's inevitable that something didn't get stuck and that little something is what would be and that's why you could have That's not bad. A little postcript to today's the reason is because it basically causes its not to be wealthy anymore. Why would that even be the case? says didn't properly get stuck and as a result they used to lose their what do you mean there's lot of bubbles there's g third generation money old money that was not something that you found very often in said if somebody eats from the above it's like He's eating the because all the me were there. It's as if they ate because the also right is like more of a a touchy feely thing. you're eating your like thing and now that that's the but the bottom line is either way don't eat the buffer or don't eat the buser one last this is the short we finished the 98% that we talked about in now the cash that the is going to ask is not a cash on the it's a cash on the of the Right. The classic it says oi carbon and we learn from the earth. So what does it say? This is this is this is talking about and it says carbon right it says carbon not carbon it says carbon so it says carbon is so you would think that the laws of relate even to it carbon you find that they're called carbon what do you find carbon and the over there is talking about look at the end of the ish So it was talking about it's not. So you see that the word even though usually you associate it with but really it could also be appish of. So, are you going to tell me that if somebody would have an animal that's or some other form of and you would bring it that you would say is not by you could bring it to but it's not something that has a that's why it's going to be excluded. Okay. I know to be these things, but I don't know to be. So, how do I know that the is excluded as well? It says in the as opposed to the that's by the way, if it's not, who is it for? This of course takes us to the famous Ramb to all those raites how was and the other one was actually note it was when you'll be 33 years old you'll understand it but either way what's the excluded from the and that clearly does not exclude it from but rather I need the extra word I mean that this was brought note so it's for that reason that it's going to be excluded It depends on when the was if it was so then you'll be excluded because of because for the where was the done? It was done in so that it was I need a separate mute to go ahead and beam at that point where it's not anymore there you could be from say the is talking about and the Mishna is talking about but says that even the had to be right he took all the ais of and He put it on top of the that's why the says what does mean of and that happens through the process of which happened in theor so even when we know this is the guy but still he's going to have to go through that's going to be done in theor it's the same just have to tweak it a little bit it's but rather what it is is or hell. So just two Haras related to today's dath. The first is that we had in the garra it took up the majority of the of the is between and whether the mabel was lar or whether the mabel was lar. Believe it or not, this had to learn a the first words of the very very longishna in the beginning of paras. Now what emerged from the gum this is very important certainly when you learn pious is that according to and according to all the people that were living in at the time died there's no sh whether the people living in survived the nobody survived the marble it's a it says every single human being died what's the shila the shila is did the physical marble descend upon on or did it not descend upon holds it did holds it didn't said that according to that the physical descended upon you understand why the people in died but according to that the physical did not descend upon then why did the people in die and the said the reason is because of the he the reason is because the of the was it was boiling hot water and as a result the heat carried over into and that's why the people living in Israel even according to who holds the physical never descended there ended up dying. It's interesting the Ramban Alra in Paris. So he discusses this in of whether or not the Mabel descended upon Israel or didn't desend upon Erit Israel. He quotes this discussion from a it's a bracious rabbid gim if you want to look it up the bracious rabb over there is discussing that when he wanted to figure out whether the mabble was still alive or not alive. So we know that he sent out the dove and he sent out the raven and then the bird comes back with a zas right there was an alias that was and the men over there is discussing where did this come from said you want to know where it came from the dove brought it from because the land of was never affected and never was mush from the waters of the makers This is what the meant when he told that the quoted in today's but the point is that the way and that is that says no you want to know where that zas came from it actually came from. Either way, skipping a little bit reading the essentially what the med is saying is is that the reign of the never descended upon. Additionally, we know that the Mabel was a two-prong attack. Water came from the heavens. Additionally, water came from him as well. But to think that there was no water in is a colossal mistake. The water spread throughout the world. Even in it has to be that way. You know why? Because ain't get there. There's no fence surrounding to protect the water from being able to come. But the bottom line is says the Ramb that even though the says that it doesn't mean that the water of the m never had any ashit. Of course it had what it means IS but to say that there was no water there. Of course. So there would have been no physical way for this not to have happened. Either way, it's mour in the Ramban that the Ramban is learning that the Mandar that holds that the Mabel never descended upon Erit Israel agrees that the waters of the Mabble descended upon Erit Israel and it created a tremendous a tremendous amount of damage stating that there was no gash and stating that the never went and the never overflowed. At first glance, it would seem a little bit like the Ramban almost forgot. The Gmorra that we learn today. Why? Because in our theasha according to who is the that holds the never descended upon say how come the says why did everyone die and what did the Garra say? The Gmorra said the telling you a different terrorist. The rabb says even in because there was no G surrounding Israel. So you want to know why EVERYBODY DIED? EVERYBODY DIED because they all drowned in the water. It's because of the fact that there was nay. It didn't rain didn't open up. So what the water came from everywhere else. But the bottom line is the Ramban is learning up in the PK that the entire world was all the people were killed because of the fact that the water dispersed even says at first glance it's now he says So it's that's true. But the bottom line is that in over here and at first glance haram even though he has a mar from is somewhat but just to make a little bit of a a summary of what emerges is really these three ideas in terms of why the people initi from the because the was just like it was everywhere else according to the really wasn't in but they died they died because of the because of the he because of the smoke and according to they died because there was no m there but the water spread there and it's for that reason that they ended up dying I saw in the safer naseresh. So the naresh is a perish that was written by a kadmo the was miguga we've quoted from the saresh in the past it's a classic work it's written a little bit as well many people have gone to his cave maybe not even realizing he's buried in one of the oldest is in Vienna it's a place that when you go to the there people visit his caver and say we'll say from him but in the over Here in parak he has a tremendous where he discusses the between and this shil of whether the m was or whether the m was not init and he says what would be theor to say that the m was again this is not a midi he said but what would be the rationale what would be the reasoning behind it so he says he says everybody knows that says in the beginning of parishes what does it mean that there were three of that got destroyed together with the so says that the emmes is it's a big that something like that could have happened why because we know the Ramban talks about this throughout his that every single and has a kov and a mazle and a mal and a there's layers of metaphysical beings that govern the land and there's no way that the of any particular land would have ever allowed something like this to happen. So how did it even happen? I'm going to tell you why. Because it's the says destroyed. What does it mean that even the to destroy in fact says that the way that the m happened and the way that it sort of played itself out was that WENT AND HE TOOK OUT THE ON TOP, RIGHT? HE went ahead and he took out the president and the prime minister and then he was able to control the rest of the country BECAUSE IF YOU TAKE OUT THE LEADER NOW all of a sudden the country's been handed to you on a silver platter and you could run it or do whatever you want to do with it and that's exactly what did what he did was he took out all these and these and by him going and taking them now now all of a sudden it was OPEN SEASON NOW we can take all the people now all of a sudden we can take gim everything was able to be absorbed. He says we know is the one land like says over and over and over again that's not the of a maz of a of a and it's for that reason it was impossible for the LAND TO BE AFFECTED BECAUSE THERE WAS NO TAKING OUT THE LEADER ON TOP AND BEING THAT YOU CAN'T TAKE OUT THE LEADER on top there was no way for this to be impacted that the of understanding why the wasn't your is the same of the Indian It's understanding the difference between it's on the deepest and on the most fundamental of levels. Then he goes and he starts tightening up a lot of the just mentioned too comes to and he tells him Right. It's wordy. All these by the marble are a little bit wordy. So he touches as follows. He said I'm going to bring on the is going to destroy everybody. But you know where that's going to go? It's going to be limited. It's going to be it's only going to go to the parts of the world that are they're underneath the of the underneath these and they're underneath these mazo. He quotes the in. So all these lands that are over there it's going to be because there there's going to be the and the is going to go the is going to wipe it out. Stating that. Don't think that if you're not in over there you're going to be potter because every place that's on earth even if you're not even in where it's where but there it's going to be as well over there people are also going to die says also the lion is means total annihilation total destruction because they're dying from the as opposed to a much softer lion the dying because of the heal over here. He touches the again. He says, "Why does the Torah keep on saying that it was?" Of course, it was. This is where it's that the only descended on the parts of the land that were shay. Now, what does it relate to everywhere else? Yeah, they ended up dying. And that's why you find the and that's this of that's a separate Indian. But the May the May is always associated with the from the Beresh over here in his uh classic work on the I was just thinking to put the beginning of the DF in the middle of the D and the end of DF al together what was the primary topic of today's daf the right it was the is you could have had you know maybe should be subject to the laws It's not really it's not going to be said what's that but my came out it's tell not hence the much welcome digression but the subject of the daf were the laws of the paraduma the laws of the paras where was the paraduma brought So it's very much the topic of today's the criteria is that it had to be outside and maybe also had to be said is a of where the was brought right it was brought on the haramish it was brought on it was brought on why was it brought on why was it brought on har I don't know but maybe there's a little bit of a that when ya send not yina when nyak sends the y not when ya sends the but when sends the still holding in shabas. But when Noyak sent the ya to go see like what's going on. So the ya came back with an alias of and where did he get the alias from? He got it from he got it from Har and like the med says what's the of the fact that he took it from haram because was not affected by the m and what does it mean that wasn't affected by the m that means is it means that is a of so when they went and they did the and the had to be brought on a mo of right like you don't find anywhere in the entire there's no precedent for this there's no comparable you'll never find something like this when we talk about The went ahead and suddenly when it came to the parad they had to find a place that was they took that place that place that symbolized the place that symbolized the fact that was it was the that it was never affected because the never went ahead and had any impact on it that place where there was a misus that that's where the ya wasak and that's was able to find Ali it's in that place again a little that the parad was brought just to be the lish part of the daf and I got at the part of the daf and we'll stop