Zevachim 102

We've all learned Kish, maybe even thought we understood. But now with his trademark depth and clarity and his signature uptempo daffomi style, Repsuri Bournestein uncovers the layers beneath the words, revealing a world of meaning, relevance, and beauty in every line. Where the deraim of the bass medish meets pushup shot. Discover the shear that's redefining how people learn Kumish. Reprly Bournestein's Kishar. Find it on the Lakewood Dafomi app or wherever this shear is being heard. Today's daff is and we have 13 lines from the bottom of was a classic daf. It discussed the beginning of parini specifically after burnt one of the carbonas that were brought on that very special day. They burnt the was really upset. He got angry at them. explained to Mosha what he had done. Moisha realized he had made a mistake and the primary topic of the daff was on the one hand on the other hand and the question was why in fact burnt the carbonas said had discussed it in great detail. There was one nuance that the Gmorrah had mentioned which the Gmorrah is going to get back to in a moment. But for now we digress from this morning's topic to another very very classic. So are both classic for different reasons regardless unbeknownsted was a god. So if you ask your kid who was a god aaron if you would say when I was in yeshiva I'd get a fr. But the truth is Rav said no was also a and he ate that's only was able to eat this p is in par and the truth is that if you take a look at the context of then what is saying at first glance isn't such an incredible par discusses the and as we mentioned this morning was the that served as during the it was only on the eighth day from that the torch was handed from but this idea that mobu would be a kayen isn't so foreign because it's it's thatu served for the seven days stating that was saying rab was saying that you could have thought that when did the during the he did so as a zar it was an that Kasha bazar kamashon that that wasn't the case says Rav he did it as a kay not just that god and not just that and this is really the kicker rav held as we're going to see in the course of the thatu never lost his status as if to say and once was for the seven days of the moherenu would remain a for the rest of his life as if to say if he wanted to do the avoid at some point year 38 in the midbar it was something that he had a right to do either way had previously said and that's why the is digressing into this topic that one of the three kashes is how could you say that the reason that the was burnt was it's true that and wasn't because he lost his two sons Allah because they lost their brothers. But Pinas was a and wasn't an because were uncles to Pinas and there's no when it comes to an uncle. So the gar was one of three kashes that why they have to burn the why couldn't they now if you're going to tell me that is right that was also why only ask from why didn't they also ask from wasn't a it's a says it could be really and from that standpoint he could have eaten but at the same time it's not a Why the Gamaru didn't ask Mosher Rabenu should have been the one that ate the carbonas because it was understood that it wasn't practical for Rabenu to eat the carbon was busy. What was he busy with? Rashi says that's referring to the days leading up to where was the in between. He was the messenger between. So when said nasma said one second let me go up to let me notify that he said when told that for three days you have to separate from your wives came down and told them and when was going up and down the mountain he'sash and the garra seems to suggest if that's the way it was then that's probably always the way it was. So was tired was tired. It's for that reason despite the fact that he was a cayenne couldn't eat from the carbon and that's why the kasha was should have eaten but there was never au incidentally the speaks out that that's probably why according to never did the meaning if holds the was how come you don't find that decided one year he's the he's going to do the we probably heard about that had that ever happened never happened you know why because he was tried was to in he's giving up says the yes the of was greater than the of and for have decided to go do the would have been a downgrade for him as a result being actually made sense regardless there's no I'll ask you a second that's a real and the is describing is not to do the butum is allowed to eat kchum And the Pik says he's allowed to eat and now kadashim is self-explanatory. That's a that's the that's of course the no one's allowed to eat. So the is allowed to eat. He's also allowed to eat. What's the other? So by process of elimination it obviously means but the Gar asks why does the P have got to single out that is allowed to eat both and says the price had it only said and not said I would have thought because you find a even though more than I will find you a a ka that kachik kadasham has that kacham kum doesn't have and that is it's mut to azar that's not true but there was a time in history that it was mut to aar you find historically for a zar with kach but you don't find that by kachum so that's why the has to say that the eat kachum even though thera already said that you're eat and had it not said kach kadash Meaning it would have only said that that's easy. Maybe dad is not allowed to eat. Bottom line, the puzzle to eat. He can't do the but he could eat. Which kachum could he eat? Kachchim kadashim. The ter had to say both says the brace. The fact that it had to say kachim kach kadashim even though it already said kachum kum. That's easy cuz you would have thought had it only said that which has a kadusha but which is more maybe that is now. Why did the have to say? Let it just says the kach that you don't have by kachumazar. You find a kachar that you don't find says the what is that? Where in the world do you find that is allowed to eat kadash? Even the wives of kachashim once upon a time there must be somewhere a a where is that says the mo maybe it's referring to during the ate from kach kadashu must have been aar so you see that once upon a time a was allowed to eat from kach kadashim you don't find that ate kachum you only find that he ate kach kadashim must be that's the kuler that thear is referring to what do you see then that mobu had a dinner of That's not what the price means. It's referring to a then on a even is allowed to eat but you don't find anywhere that he eats. explains it's going to man the mother holds that a ma was brought on if a was born speaks out that how would you have kadash on only a why you could bring an oil on but wasn't eaten that could never have been brought on and the carbon obviously wasn't brought on either so the only form of that could have been brought on was the m and it's like this whether you can bring a mama But if the bal brings this carb eat from it. So you see that could eat kachadashim whereby you don't find anywhere that he could eat kach rashi. Why not? He can't eat from a carbon says rashi. That's true. He could eat from a a carbon but only the of the was anyways. What about the of the supposed to go to the truma of the carbon? There was no so you don't find anywhere that aar is allowed to eat that had the trad but you maybe like that was you don't find anywhere that it was eaten by because it wasn't eaten by maybe over there the to eat it that he's allowed to eat and bottom line is is that you have no from this thus strike two we don't have a kasha on the gar asks a third kasha we know that miriam in the end of parish was a mitzvah in order for someone to be a mitzvah you need a k to pasin that this person is a mitzvah so who was the ken that presided over Miriam a It wasn't maybe a car is also now gave Miriam tremendous coverage said I'm going to be bottom line is what did the B say that it could have been Moisha that presided over Miriam cuz Rav said that who became a during the retained his status of not just an ordinary here that says that maybe really the agrees with that. What does it mean? because in order to preside over it's not enough to be a so because wouldn't necessarily give him the right to be involved in he was a it's only clapp I think the obvious question is then what about Hashem said I'll be either way so this is referring back to this morning's And on that day, Elisha also known as Elisha also known as also known as wife. So Alishba on that day had five. She was Bima because she got five levels of number one. This is an interesting her brother-in-law meaning her husband's brother. She would be the in the event that it played out as Melik who was her husband's brother's brother was Melik is her husband was the bin her son Rashi says he was the scan Allah son was he was the m and her brother he was the she had five but unfortunately she also had us times two she lost two of her sons what do we need from this her brother-in-law was if was also why does it only say so the gmorra says not melik you could always add it to and say regardless really this sh of whether or not was a kod or not a kodalle and we asked kasha from bryce after bry after bryce after bry And we deflected theas on all these braces stating that it says the it's really the says and the context is revealed to by the burning bush for the first time right the rest is history. So is told bye I want you to be the you're going to take the inanimate refused back and forth forth and back. Who am I? I don't have a good finally gets angry at made an observation. He said every time you find in the something bad happens afterwards. Take a look at Rash gives examples. Sometimes there's a sometimes there's anifa. Sometimes there's a there's always something that goes down. But this is the one exception to the rule. Nothing bad happened. Hashem got angry at but at the same time nothing happened to it's not true. There was a says knew everyone knows that wasn't a ley was really a what it means is told after went back and forth for a week. My initial thought was that you would be a and your brother would be a ley but now because of the way things played out who he's going to be a instead you're going to be it's not true said that when it says that there was a what was the was supposed to be but because now's going to be going So never became the say it's not true for seven days that became a not like and he was a for seven days but even more than seven he was a cayenne for his entire life not like the what then does it mean when a got to not aaron but was a cen and his children working as well. Whereas for himself was a but his children would never be meaning was number one the says it's only his sons will be but he himself will be another everyone knows the what does the mean was and was a coin. Why do you need to tell you what maybe the first not such a good ride because the first is in the over there is describing it's describing family. So it says oh on the topic the Mosha's family they were maybe had we been talking about Mosha we'd mentioned that Mosha was also a ley from the fact that the Pik says Mosha's children were but it doesn't say Mosha was a it's not a ra that mo wasn't a le maybe we're just describing his children therefore we mention the other to tell me that no bottom line is is a big time regarding the status of says says that mosh was supposed to be a but because of it was became the meaning was never was the say was but only for seven days after the seven days he was a zar there's a third that says became during the and he remained for the rest of his life says that says that is going the third that was in fact a he was in for his entire life. So even though there's a bunch of bryes that the had a force to make work with we don't have to say that at the end of the day it's really has a it's not like it's not like but it's like and is going like thus at the end of the day whether it was or maybe it was just an ordinary is really it's in a big says the So the B again with comment that every time it says in the there's always a this is the only time where there's no that was responses no also it says was supposed to be the he ends up being the true I'll find you an example where it says and there's no Russian nothing happened it says that left angry nothing happened said it's not true you have to know the rest of the story says he slapped him in the face and he left so there was a Russian say that would have slapped a par in the face but the says told when he went to parro for the first time how you going to find parro so he says just go to him by the he goes to the bathroom no one thinks he goes to the bathroom. You're going to find him there and you should go. What does it mean? Go and give him cover. Stand respectfully because the end of the day is a king just the opposite. Go with go with an L is the one that said that he had to have cover. So how could say that slap Harry in the face? say seems to be of the opinion that even a Russia like parad it's that said the opposite understood that was telling me was go to him with a said that slapped in the face and that's the the person should always have for the The says that is telling at the end he says you're going to see your slaves are going to come crawling to me. They're going to come and they're going to say just leave already. Why did he say not is not going to do the same thing must be because he wanted to show that is running in front of he's giving is one of the kings that have no of fame. So why is the why is he glo and even though he was a Russia like at the end of the day there's an idea of will speak out about this tomorrow said wanted to be king but they didn't give it to him tells you you can't go past this The word is referred to. You find that word in the context of this talking. Who am I that I'm king? See, you see the word is in the context of of king. So what did he tell? What do you mean when he said apparently was lobbying to be king and hashem told you can't be king? One of the five that in other hand was that her brother-in-law her so to speak was king. Seeu was king. It's true was king. What we mean is that he wanted that he should be the king of Israel that his family should be the kings like and that's what wasn't given to him. Meaning when Hashem said what he meant to tell him was that your family can't have the meaning he's suggesting that the word doesn't just mean it means really was what he couldn't get was the who in you find this word referring to his and we know only he was king his family never got the the malus it was David's family that got the same either you can say it's not true his son is also king for a very short is different meaning because really was supposed to be and his family was supposed to be. So when got it was it was for his family. He lost it but it was supposed to be that way. And the says, "I'll prove it to you." Who gives to a person always gives us he loses a muchdeserved and a much needed. The bottom line is what the Gmorra is saying is is that really really wasn't of it was just because of that ended up losing the bottom line is exhale. So there's really two things that I mean there's so much here in this in this but I think two things that are worth discussing. number one what we saw at the end of the previous staff which was the segue into this staff which is and when exactly became a and number two this idea of being a so let's start we'll start with so there was on the one hand on the other hand why exactly burnt said they burnt it they were in it and even though there that that on that day was allowed to eat but felt that it was only true for the it wasn't true for the dias they ate the that they brought on that day they ate the the the ate but the was that they foiled that they they weren't allowed to eat and that's why they bring as three kashas the we need for now was if the reason they didn't eat it because they were eaten. Well, they the only kayan in the world. There were the kay there was pinas and being that pinas was also a kay why couldn't pinas eat it and the garamar gave two tuts in the garra's ter was that pinas wasn't a kay at that time and being that pinas wasn't a k at that time mean it's true of course pas goes down is one of the great kayam of all time but had not yet been when did become a so that's where there's two truths from the law says that became and that's how you stand up say that Hashem says and he gives him the why was he it was only because of the fact that he had killed Zim but at that time which is right in the beginning he wasn't a being that he wasn't a yet should have eaten it said that even after the mice of even after the mice of Zim wasn't a he didn't become a kay until Yeshua either way that's the the garra at the end of bottom line is is that when you walk away when you walk away from this you walk away with when exactly became a according to their was it can't be could have eaten it they obviously held was a held he wasn't when did he become says in paras Raashi says so we have three shas in this right here when became a either he was a right away that first day was already a he becomes a after or he becomes a it's interesting that if you learn with the beginning of it's clear that it's as well in other words the rash asks aasha he says that how was pinas allowed to kill zim pin was is not in the maze. So how in the world was Pin able to go into the Koopa and kill Zim as a as a he wasn't allowed to be in the maze and the rush grapples with the question to the point that the rush ends up saying that probably what happened was is that when Zimry went and pierced Zimry when Pinas went and he pierced Zimry he was a he was but he hadn't actually died and mean that he hadn't actually died so at that point he wasn't to me yet because Pinos was a cenos was a kayen He had no right to go out the valley and the say the cash is a take that wasn't a became a after or maybe even became a later on in Yeshua and the bottom line is when you learnish it looks like a it's confusing it's a big as if no one saw when became a why the confusion bottom line is that when you learnish is really it's right over here with but I'm going to tell you what that is in brings from he brings it from the guri and and from others as well again above our pag but says he says that say that when zimry went to kill when pinas went to kill Zimri Shim saw what was going to go down. Zim was the ni of Shim and they got up to kill him and was very very scared and and Hashem gave him back but he didn't give him back his own. He gave him back the of had in him the of that was the that he got back right after he had lost his because of the fear that he had because was about to kill him says what's the what's the chief kite what's the he says based on a well-known the when it describes who married it says that are he took away from and says what's this? So her was that she came from Isra and she came from she came from Israel. She also came from Pitbra who was involved in his in his was very handsome. And was was say again quoting that that had in his and he had in his of he had to be macking the fact that was that's the emphasis that put when we describe And the swarm say that with the of the zer came out from from between his fingers. That's he came from the zer. That's why that lost 10 sons. The 10 sons that he lost were the 10 of zer that were me. But the bottom line is the bottom line is is that now had to be in his from he had to be and on some level there was of that he needed to be as well from this idea of of the but but alopon had to be maken both things. How was he machining these two things? He was making them by killing Zimry because Zimry was involved in Gilead. He was a boiler but we know the rest of the story. We've spoken out rain on this so many times that really the took place was very much intertwined with go through the bottom line is is that zer was engaged in two aas of and was engaged in a of soil needs to be macked in these two things he goes ahead and he kills he goes ahead and he kills but says the that's the tie kite in the nish of Because a also had to be mak in these two things. We know the says that one of the reasons that died prematurely is because they didn't want to get married. We always speak out for why they didn't want to get married. But didn't want to get married. So because they didn't want to get married, he had to be m they require tick on at the same time the says why did au die? Because they brought in a zor and a zoro is is an Indian of a zoro. So views also need a tickle in these two areas. How did they get tickled in these two areas? They come into the right when is about to kill. So now could be at the same time he's being for these two things on the one hand and the fact that they they brought this on the other in another piece says similarly that say that why did they mean they needed and an art says that really all they have there is tribute to another all stem from the fact that they were take a look but says the so has to be the the what did they need for cuz they were when they weren't supposed to be how was he by being by being when he was supposed to be the bottom line is a little bit of interesting rage some of the rest of the rest of the story as it relates to pinas regardless a little bit more and then we'll come back to the to the second part of the raid and we'll do some we'll do the third part of the raid if we have time either way so the Mishna had said balm that even though is not allowed to do the but is allowed to eat kach not only is he allowed to eat kachum but he's even meaning you would have thought that maybe he's allowed to eat it so a kind that's not he has a when they divvy up the they give the kuka of the kachch so this kasher can get it and if he wants to give it to his friend that's a balum he can give it to his friend that's maybe the bum doesn't have a to be involved in the actual the said he does not even say so it says and this is describing the it says movement what's called if it's coming to tell me that eat it we had the earlier in the right? We know he's allowed to eat it. It must be this is coming. Then not only is allowed to eat, but he even is able to be it says by the possibility that's the call that it says by the is coming to teach me a third. I would have thought maybe only a kan that was born and later he became a he know someone that was born that he too is allowed to teach me that even if he was born even he is allowed to eat another and this is regarding the so the first one is by the second is the third is the rabbis we already checked off all those boxes must be what's is the last one coming to teach me I would have thought only meaning I would maybe someone that's he has a that's never going away but someone that has a transient maybe he's not even right that's what means in ENGLISH RIGHT YOU WOULD THINK JUST THE opposite no it's not English but you would think that should be more cool than a kav I would have thought only kav could eat gacha So the says I'm right flip it. Meaning I would have thought only I need another to tell me about he tummy. I would have thought that is like a tummy just like a tummy. as long as he's not he's allowed to eat. He's not allowed to eat. You would have thought that mean that he's going to be for the rest of his life. So we let him eat but maybe look at him like a to right. So right now he's on the disabled list literally and as a result we can't give him but maybe later being that he's going to he's going to be okay afterwards maybe it should be okay. The Mishna continued and the Mishna said any person that can't do the doesn't get from the and really as we'll see in the you see two things in this number one if you can't do the avoid but you also see that if you could do the avoid you're always at least the thinks that's what you say Frank Is that true? Number one, how could you tell me any person that's not is not it's not but if you are you are that's if it's a because it's but you can't eat because we know even though but doesn't give you a right to eat says the change the gears on the mission not is that so because it would come out then same that if you're I have an example of someone that's says the I hear meaning you can't make the dick what the Mishna says is based on the editor of the garlic. You thought that there was a nice but if you are scratch that dick that's not a real if that's not a can then you don't have to change the gear in the mission we can go back to the original ga the original was not rather we had twoas the first was the second was it's says I'll answer both second First, as it relates to the second, what do you mean? Is not doesn't say that. Meaning it says if you're not it doesn't say that if every single time you're with regards to someone that's not over there. Then the mission continued and the Mishna said that if somebody is somebody was Tommy at the time of then he was so he was at the time of this and then afterwards he became it's not enough to be you have to be at the time of this says the it's what if it would be in the reverse not he was Tommy he And he became it sounds like he'd be you have to be by both. You have to be a royal and what would be if he was he was but he became Tommy in between do you say mean that he was Tommy in between or maybe he has to bear the entire time says the so before we go and we learn a rather complex daft a little bit or complex gumar I should say just a little bit of moray that is so the in its discussion was hear asked how could say was a says who was break the mash the obvious kasha for the same price that the garra says that a har couldn't be the one cuz was a kar was also a kar so ifra was also a karif so why does say mish was a zar a haram was a kar once you have to say to explain a who was not a zar so why didn't just say that the reason couldn't be mas is also because was a says could have said that but a better reason had to being maser. It wasn't a kaya. If you're not a kayen, you you're not at all to do the scar. But the swarms say a swarm say that Rabenu was a brother. Mosher Rabenu was Miriam's brother. But then Mosenu changed. Mosher Rabenu reached levels. Mosha Rabenu was nak to such a madrega that he lost his physicality to the point that he was no longer able to be considered Miriam's brother and to the point that was not a hire's problem. So there would not have been of soul kurva the she was a he had no sh to being able to to presiding over but as far as the kurva being thatu had reached such a level it's for that reason it wasn't an issue the obvious question is you find throughout the say even though there there's no that that maybe they're going to be lying because the end of the day you're crazy so you have to say that it's just like a bal it's not that it's it's a real life shar coming together saying Maybe they wouldn't be maybe mish would be we're trying to make a point. We're trying to make a point that mish are brothers and if he had brothers where but the bottom line is the bottom line is save the reason the gar didn't say that was Miriam's car wasn't Miriam's car and biologically they were brother and sister but raenu had reached a maj and as a result of that maj that he had reached you no longer view them as just I'll just share with you a nla that I recently heard and that is I don't think we spoke of yet And that is that one of the most sus most ambiguous parishes in the is the parame right is is is very very confusing and everybody grapples what exactly was you would think it'd be straightforward. It's not and the stakes were very were really really high. The repercussions were that because of the was not allowed to lead the Jews into but what exactly the a was no one knows. There's a lot of there's a lot of confusion. There's a safer called ashtos that was written by raising no relation as far as I know but it was written by by raising the safer was unique in that it had a khim brrisa brriska didn't give many as briska gave a hama on the safer and in that safer this magn asked this he says why is this par so it's probably the most parish in the so he said it says the says in that was the says that he was an he was a malik. So it said that theu did happened in the it happened in the part of that was a malik and being that we have no in it's not something that we can even begin to comprehend. It's for that reason why we cannot be what the was because it's something that took place in a realm that's so the reason we don't understand is because it was done by it was done by that was what came to mind what came to mind was the tom where the discusses the fact that was the he was the one that was and he has an thatu became a malik. Mishraenu lost his and that's why the how do you know maybe was going to do an a maybe a time would come where people wouldn't believe inu anymore had lost his wasn't possible anymore for to do a real the way we understand because had had lost his that's why was able to to stop the sun and and he was able to be mgab on top top of it's classic we've spoken up bits and pieces of it but the bottom line is it's became like a malik in the sense that he had lost his was also like a malik in the sense that he was really a malik was a malik the point is he's a malik he lost his toiam and that's why the didn't say that was a what the said was something else I was thinking maybe you know say that was and if you think about it's very very difficult to understand how could have not been it would seem to be aos maybe again way above my pay grade but maybe if if Mishraenu had gone above and beyond his kurva he had reached a level as much asu's sons were his sons maybe they weren't his sons meaning if Miriam wasn'tu's sister that maybe weren't sons either says 52 it's coming to teach me that had a son I'm sorry for we know I'm sorry we know had a son what's what's going on we need is 52 Benon is 52 52 52 oh had a son we know had a son says the par is right after right after the and by the was a he was the kurdish kadashim he was became so cadesh that he lost his he lost his brain. So as much as technically biologically was a rau son really wasn't his son. So says the that even though maybe on some level doesn't have a son anymore but 52 he had a son but it's not on the same level of because on some level says that he he wasn't his son anymore cuz he was in Scottish regardless a little bit more. So the per began and again I caution you this next is a little challenging. So the the peric began with the changes to I heard the following and I'm about to tell you and he said it over in the if you look at the last line on the think is going to ask I thought you're not allowed to be in the we'll get to that but said The following exchange, the following I heard from a blessed in says would come over to a regular and he would tell the I want you to give me of a carbon I want to tail in the carbon he could tell him that we learned in the beginning of the par the gor said that a is not so once we know that a doesn't get the is going to be able to deflect the and tell him you can't get from the either I was able to push you away from taking the carbon then certainly I should be able to knock you off from the and that's based on the fact that a has more than he has in a ifra brings a the gets if a I'm sorry if brings a the gets of it if brings the also gets of it. If brings a gets a but if a brings a known as it's like the he doesn't get of it. So it comes out that has more of a than so ordinarily have more in the doesn't have a so certainly a where have less is not going to have any. So the way was played it out was in rather dramatic form was if the was going to approach the give me from I could take I cannot give you certainly I don't have to give you a but says can respond you know what you can push me away from because you also have just like I have most you have so you have a to knock me out But doesn't mean you could push me away from the mah because although it's true from my perspective I don't get the I certainly shouldn't get the but from your perspective I can flip it that maybe you can push me away from the because you have more in the but just like I have less in the you also have less in the so although I'm in the you're also in the so maybe you can't push me away in the way the bottom line is although the the that's not doesn't have a real but at the end of the day he could knock him away based on the you tell him you want go bring the carbon and he you can't bring the carbon because you're says that doesn't get the carbon mainly had we only had this that says that doesn't get the so what about the now we know from the beginning of the peric that aim doesn't get the katas but is playing this out in real time. So in this part of the price is making believe we don't know yet the doesn't get the soy would come over to the he would say where I have less in the why do I have less in the because I don't eat from still I was able to knock you away and tell you you can't have from my the certainly I should be able to push you away and not give you the tell the same thing we said in the previous you know why you're able to knock me out from the it's true you don't have that much I don't need to have that much of the so being that I don't have that much of the I'm easily deflected doesn't mean you can push me away from the Because although you're going to tell me if you can knock me out from the certainly you can knock me out from the that's from your perspective. From my perspective, you could only knock me out from the because I have less in the doesn't mean you can knock me out from the bottom of said only someone that can do the gets to eat but someone that can't do the doesn't get if he tells him if he comes to him he says give me from the carbon so the telly you're not getting the meaning we just established that the doesn't get from the he could tell him you're not going to get from the either got less meat with the he got from the so ordinarily you get more meat you have more I was able to knock you out certainly by the I can knock you out but says maybe the could respond you think that I have more than I could spend it differently I could I can tell you a lesser that I have in my wife and my slaves can't eat from the but said so maybe I'm more of the you're telling me I less in the so if doesn't get from the certainly shouldn't get from the schlam maybe [ __ ] maybe the has more in the schlam than the katas cuz no he gets less meat in the schlam but he can share it with his family as oosed He can't show his bottom line it's bottom line is that in this in drama tried getting he tried getting from the he tried getting from the and he couldn't get anything so he walked out of court with the all the on his head is on his right is on his And then he walked out just like don't get doesn't get eaten as why did stop there. He could have continued because just like doesn't get from the and the he shouldn't get from either. So he could have played out the same exact regarding the should have told him give me from so what's the target I'm not giving you from the from the I don't have so much because I can't give it to my family I was able to push you away I can chew with my whole family not just that it's all mine Well, certainly I should be able to knock you away. But what's the I'm going to respond. You were able to push me away from the just like you don't have that much in the you can't share with your family. I don't have that much. That's why I'm very easily deflected. Then maybe you can't push me away from the because as much as you have more in the I also have more in the So again, there's a that says the only time you get from the is if you're doing the bottom line is so why did not add this fourth part to his. So the Gar says he's going to say it actually says we learn from there that even that you would have thought ordinarily cannot eat he still can eat meaning that's a again a that's a is allowed to eat from a bottom line is Rav said over this this very interesting he said that he heard this from when was in the bathroom frankly tomorrow. How was he allowed to do this? You're allowed to think anywhere except here. It sounds like he was even talking and learning. So the says you have to say was okay last because used to learn so much he couldn't stop himself from learning that he couldn't stop himself from learning. It's for that reason that it was okay for him to