Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Heat. Heat.
[Music]
Today we're going to discuss one of the
most common questions asked following
Pur. Uh probably every major Jewish
courthouse gets asked this question
after Purim and that is very simply like
this. Mrs. Cohen is just shued out the
last
drunkards. He's
left and it's time to clean up. And as
she's cleaning up, she notices on the
floor there is a smashed vase. And this
is not only
a cheap vase which you pick up in
Walmart or Tesco. This is a this is a
nice vase. It's an expensive vase. And
how did it happen? She finds out that
her neighbor from down the road was very
drunk. And whilst he was drunk, he
smashed the vase. These things happen.
It's very sad. What do we do? What do we
say to Mrs. Cohen? She's dragging along.
That's a good Jewish name. Mr. to
Goldberg from down the road who was
drunk and he smashed the vase. What do
we say to them? Do we say he's drunk?
What's he do? He's drunk. He wasn't
aware. He didn't know what he was doing
then. Or do you say
net be a man? If you're drunk, you got
to be reliable. Got to be responsible.
Can't just throw it away. You can't just
throw up responsibility like that. This
is question number
one. Question number two, this is a true
story. It happened when I was in yeshiva
in
America. A bunch of guys a bunch of guys
who went and pur to a party and they
came there. It was a big party. He was a
wealthy man before the story happened.
And they were having a great
time and this man really liked the bak
from my yeshiva. I wasn't there at the
time. They really liked him. And after
being there for a while, he says, "Guys,
which is Shiv from?" So they told him,
he says, "Wow, I love you guys." And he
takes out his checkbook and he writes
$50,000. And he gives it to my
friends. 2 days later, Marisha gets a
call. He says, "Hi, this is Mr. So and
so I had your boys over. Such nice boys.
I'm so impressed.
Um I you know I was a little bit drunk
on Purim. I love gaming stalker but I
wrote $50,000. It's a lot of money. I
never meant
$50,000. It was a mistake. It was it was
it was an accident. I never in my right
mind would have given
$50,000. Then I don't know you guys. I'm
sure you're a great yeshiva. What do we
say to Mr. Richman? Let's call him.
We've used Goldberg. We've used co Mr.
Levy, what do we say to Mr. Rich Man,
Mr. Levy, who wants to go back on
his pledge of
$50,000. These are common questions
which
occur every year, each in a different
format. Every year different format.
What we're going to do about this, let's
have a look. It starts with the garra in
Sam
658. It's four lines down. The garra
says like
this. Somebody who is
drunk, his business dealings are
meccal. His sales, things he sells, they
are considered sold.
If he was over our very he transgressed
a sin which for that sin we kill Shabas
um many
others if you're over them
you are liable for the death penalty
misos even if he's drunk we still kill
him malus malos if he's over a he
transgresses a sin which you are of
malus you get 40 lashes.
39. Then even though you're
drunk, he receives every single lash he
deserves. Cla the rule
is he is like a like a wise man as
opposed to a somebody who is mentally
challenged. We don't let him off the
hook even though he's drunk. Hello. With
one
exception when he is drunk, he is potter
from Davening has a special den
because you need to concentrate. You
need to come in front of the
king, king of all kings. So, he's part
of we're going to skip one line.
says that that we say somebody who is
drunk he has he's got a he has the
responsibility of all the mitzvah and
all the except
for we didn't teach
it only if he doesn't reach the da the
level of drunkenness of light we
explained in the last sh that in hala we
categorize drunkness in three levels.
One level is called shui. Shashu means
you've drunk. You've drunk. Not necess
it's generally it's less than a review.
Sometimes it could be more than reviews,
but generally it's a small amount
something like that of this style cup,
you know, somewhere along here, you
know, for illust illustrative purposes
only. Um that's shi small amount.
There's another level which is
called which is
that you can't talk in front of a meal
in front of a king. If we'd have King
Charles from England, our beloved king
um then if he walks outside now and you
have somebody drunk in here and you said
you want to meet King Charles, you say
King Charles, he can't he won't be able
to hold himself in the proper man in
front of a king. That is the next level
which we categorize that that part is
part of if he's at such a stage he
exempt from davening. The next stage
which is a very very extreme case of
drunkardness is shik is being drunk
like lit which is basically the stage is
that he's not aware of his actions. He's
just no clue what he's doing.
um if he wouldn't if he'd be aware he
wouldn't generally he wouldn't do what
he's
doing. Um okay.
So we didn't say in the
before that you're going to be in all
the mitzvah and all the and you get any
punishment which we give for these
only that is before he reaches the
extreme measure of drunkenness of
light
a
but if he reaches the level of being
drunk like light which is the very
extreme case. Pot mullum he is scot free
he walks off crazy you know guy can get
drunk and he's potter from all mitzvah
if he does a mitzvah he ain't get it guy
shakes love when he's very drunk he
davverns he does wherever it is if he's
drunk to the stage that he's not aware
of his actions doesn't get the mitzvah
doesn't get that ver
scotfree unbelievable
Okay, let's now so if we think about the
Shiloh, let's start with the first
Shiloh with we've got a very frustrated
Mrs. Cohen dragging in Mr. Goldberg, her
neighbor, who has smashed an expensive
vase. If she'd come in after seeing the
Gamarra, what what would you think? What
would we Pascin? What would be the the
correct way to pass? We've seen the
Gomorrah
says he's for everything except he's if
he's
shik. So coming up this kumar you could
say or dying would stroke his beard and
you
say if he was shika he was drunk but not
to the level of shik shalote you'd
be but if he's drunk to the stage of
shik shalo he's part that's what I would
say from seeing the garamar it seems
like a pretty straightforward
he's still obligated to pay or replace I
don't know let's have a look at the
gamarra what does garamar say garamar
says if
it's potter but if it's not
shal all his business dealings are kayam
they they are valid I would think from
coming out of the gar at this stage
don't jump the gun we're building up
here we're building up the gar from this
stage of the garra I would say he'd be
he'd be potter if it's an extreme case
but if it's not an extreme case and he's
aware of his actions but he's just drunk
then he'd be that's what we would seem
for the gumar at this stage.
Let's go to the shar and see how he
quotes it. The next one number two
there's a box there and there's a little
says the last two lines on the page.
Hashik one who is
drunk. His business dealings are
valid. His
gifts they are
valid. If he reaches the level of
drunkenness
of he is the one who does something. He
does an
action. He's not aware of what he's
doing. He doesn't know what he's doing
because he's so
drunk. His actions are
nothing. He is like
a is
that somebody who's me mentally
challenged. He's he he's not liable.
It's a gar. It's a mishna. I think it's
pes or
madalof.
Um of a cotton is brought later. Let's
have a look at it.
That's the
law. Pigosen raw. Meeting them is bad
news. Why? Someone who damages
them. He's liable if he damages somebody
who's a is deaf and and anti and mute.
Deaf and mute. Shan who's me mentally
challenged. Cotton. Someone who is a a
minor. He's under 13 under 12 for a
girl. So if with them if you
damage
the if they damage others the potter
says
the that the den of somebody who is very
drunk to the stage of light he has a d
of a someone who's mentally challenged
he's not aware of what he's doing.
Okay. So it seems like the is going
along with this. We have a
clear which says somebody who is drunk
but it's not an extreme
case for whatever you do all your
business
transactions. But if it's shik shalo if
it's a very extreme case you're like a
sh you're like a mentally challenged
person who a mentally challenged person
if he
um damages another person he is going to
be
potter okay so we've worked from the
from the gar to
the now there's a safer a very safer
important safer on
babakama it was written by the yamash
Schlommer many years ago and he speaks
about a drunk person who
damages. Let's have a look. It's number
three says the
schlmer a drunk
person even if he's at the stage of
drunk to the stage that it's like the
shik of light very extreme case this is
in number three mo
however I'll
Alzheimer even if he's in the most
extreme
case. Unbelievable. It seems like it's a
contradiction to the garra and to
the but don't worry he addresses
it that that we say in the garra
imper the one which we just quoted
before the shik someone who's drunk to
the stage of light pot misusden he's
potter from the death penalty malconus
you don't give many malers we said in
the in the Gumar before somebody do even
if it's even if he's to a very very
extreme case the is he's going to be so
he says how can I tell you that you're
going to
be
says that is
the
he's
from the heavenly
um the heavenly laws of on that specific
ific sin or we call mock.
However, he
will receive
his punishment, his his um judgment.
Judgment. Yeah, that's a that's a good
word. He'll receive his judgment on the
fact that he didn't stop himself. He
didn't stop the the basic self-control
that he not to get so drunk to the stage
of light.
The answer says something amazing here.
Even though we let you off the hook in
Bezon, they can't kill you. They can't
give you
lashes. You've done this guy was on
Shabas. This person I say killed. Yeah.
This person killed someone. Even if he
kills someone, you don't kill it.
Intent. It's all done on intent. in yeah
even intent
remember the lion of the shak the
language of shar he says he does
something but he doesn't know what he's
doing think of try and get this drunkard
in your mind you have to like paint the
picture a bit the guy's just being put
in it's not so hard you know you walked
past and there was a guy on the bus stop
and he's lying like flat out there and
then he slowly staggers off the bench
and it's
shabusman he I don't know what's is
shabas he plants a
I don't know how he manages to do that.
He plants a tree. He drives a
car. He's He doesn't know what he's
doing. You knock him on his head. He
doesn't know that anyone's there.
Nothing. You have to understand the
level of drunk. It's talking about very
very extreme level. But says the true
you don't kill him. But the abish to
Hashem after 120 is going to say, "Mr.
Goldberg, why didn't why couldn't you
control yourself to the level that you
you are over something at Shabas? You
can control yourself to such a
thing that he's going to be called um um
um called
to judgment on Rabbi Poston. Can I ask
you underneath my Tillin bag over there
I have a paper? Do you want to pass it
to me? There is a very famous story with
Winston
Churchill. I checked it up so that no
one checks it up after me and says it's
not true. So, it's actually highly
disputed if it's true. No, it's not
disputed if it's true. It's disputed if
he was drunk or not. But this story for
sure happened. There's many different
versions of the story. I will bring um
the one that is befitting to say in a
maj I'll read it out. It's from the
international Churchill
society. This world famous encounter
occurred late one night in
1946. As Churchill was leaving the House
of
Commons, Bessie Bradock, Bessie Bradock,
an MP saw Winston walking out of the
House and Commons and she says this,
"Winston, you are drunk." And what's
more, you are disgust disgustingly
drunk. Churchill said to Bessie,
"Bessie, my dear, you are ugly. And
what's more, you are disgustingly ugly.
But tomorrow I shall be sober and you
will still be disgustingly ugly. This
was Church Hill's sharp line. It's very
famous. That I may be drunk, but you're
ugly. The next day I'm going to wake up.
I'll brush off the foam from my mouth,
clean up the sick, and whatever else
happened. And I will be fine. I'll be
the good old charming Winston Churchill.
But the next day, Bessie, you will be
ugly. Now I want to discuss after seeing
this Yamasha Schllaymer is Winston
Churchill all
right. Is it true that the next day you
can just say you know what's history is
history or do you say it comes with you?
You say if you're drunk and you're dis
disgustingly drunk as Bessie Bradock
says then maybe Mr. Churchill we love
you dearly. He goes through the Second
World
War. Now, if you're drunk and you wake
up the next day, you can't just wipe the
foam off your mouth and you can't just
clean up the sick. You were drunk. And
as you're going to
be the fact that you couldn't control
yourself that you got to such a
degrading stage, that's what the says.
You might not be liable for various
different aus you do when you're in a
stage of shikalit a very extreme stage
of being drunk but you're going to be
held accountable that you let yourself
to get such a place so if I can if
they'd ask me if I can go back to 1946
and I was at the house of commons when
Bessie Bradock made that comment to
Winston Churchill I'd I' I'd pull Mr.
Churchill aside if if the secret service
uh would let I say Mr. Churchill that's
not right. Maybe I'd wait till the next
day until he sobered up and I tell him
that no if you're drunk the next day
you're also a drunkard. You may not be
drunk then but you're somebody who
cannot control themselves to the stage
of being so
drunk. Let's carry on. The
yams the yams says what about mazic?
about the stage of doing Hezek until now
we've discussed
being over Isra being doing
transgressing sins when under the
influence well what about says
the toy yourself from the laws of
damages it's so simple there's no
question about it you are liable. Why
says the word a person is always liable
for his actions? Whether it's a mistake,
being amazed, whether it's on when it's
whether it's on
purpose, whether he's
awake, whether he's asleep. A person is
liable for his actions. Even in his
sleep, somebody goes to sleep and whilst
he's sleeping, he has a very bad dream
and there's somebody trying to get him.
And so he kicks him in order to get him
away. And he wakes up and he sees the
light bulb next to him, his little uh um
bedside table light is smashed and it's
a hotel room. What is the hal? Do you
have to pay? And the hala is he has to
pay because a person is liable for his
actions even when he's sleeping. It's a
fascinating fascinating hal this one. Um
they they do make one exception for
somebody who's sleeping cuz if you think
about it somebody goes to sleep he's not
he doesn't know what he's doing can't
blame him you know man's got to
sleep. So in halaka it's already brought
in the Xiaomi makes
one one case where it's different and
that is one
exception if somebody goes to sleep and
when he's going to sleep the light bulb
is there before he went to sleep there
is somebody puts on his bedside table an
expensive vase and as he's going to
sleep he knows the vase is there and in
his sleep. He hits it and it falls on
the floor and smashed to
smithetheriness. He gets taken to basin.
He's going to
be But if in his sleep somebody comes
along and puts a vase next to his next
to him, then he's potter. Yeah, you know
this one. I understand. Yeah, you can
understand it, right? Yeah. Cuz it's not
his fault. How can he be liable for
something that got placed there when he
was sleeping? It's not his fault. No.
So that's one exception we have for
Yoshan Bane owners bane roson a person
carrying on the line from the yamash
he's quoting a
Mishna a person is always liable for his
actions whether it was a mistake whether
it's on purpose whether he's awake
whether he's sleeping whether it was aus
is a complete accident onus is somebody
who there there's just like no way in
the world it was on purpose sh is a
mistake you know You could have you
could have looked you could have been a
bit more
careful. There's nothing to do about it.
Bane wrote some on purpose. This is the
line. Even
as he should also be why because he's
not worse than he's not worse than the
worst type of mistake that there is out
there. And then he adds on another line.
If you don't tell me that a
like you won't be able to let anybody
live that won't we won't be able to have
a society a functional society.
Every person who has an enemy, he'll
drink and get
drunk in his friend's property in order
to damage him, right? It doesn't.
Unfortunately, these things happen. You
know, let's take a business partnership
that's been known for many years and one
of them does something to upset the
other one and they end up bitter
enemies. It should never happen. Let's
say it happens.
says, "Mr. Goldberg, who was best
friends with Mr. Levy yesterday, and
they become worst enemies, he doesn't
want to pay if he goes and smashes up
Mr. Goldberg's brand new Lamborghini."
That's not something he wants to do. It
will get him into big debts. So, what
does he do? He goes just outside his
Lamborghini, 2:00 in the morning, drinks
an entire bottle of vodka. He waits five
minutes and then he's totally totally
hammered. He smashes up his Lamborghini.
Potter I'm shiko. I'm potter says we
can't have such a thing. Society can't
function like that. It has to be even if
he's shik is
fascinating.
Okay, let's recap a little bit. We
started with the gumar. Gomorrah says
somebody who is drunk but not an extreme
case he is for all the mitzvah and all
the everything he does except
for that's only if it's a general
drunkenness but if it's an extreme case
then he's going to be we saw
the says what that it brings down the
mecc
um
mechan all his business dealing is valid
but if it's
potter adds on the words that he has a
den
of he has a d of a mentally challenged
person then we saw the amma and explain
the garra that says he's when it's what
does it mean
he's med from paying
but he might be part but he he's going
to have to din he's going to have to
give judgment that he couldn't control
himself and we explained on that that
that proves Winston's Churchill Winston
Churchill's line famous line to be wrong
that a person who gets drunk cannot put
it in the history person who gets drunk
it's because of a lack of control and
the next day you are still a person who
doesn't have control you can work on it
you can get rid of it then And says that
a person who damages is not included in
the Gomorrah that says your potter from
everything you're going to be for Hez
for damages you're going to be. We're
going to have a look now at the
Shilabach. This is box number four. Uh
excuse me for the print. This is what it
looks like. There is one newer print. It
wasn't on this computer program I was
using.
Uh the
Bach not the one who made all sorts of
lovely music that's a different Bach. Um
this Bach was a big many years ago. He
wrote in the side the sh but this is in
his sh this is in his response. It's
number 62 and this is the middle of it.
Somebody asked him a question and this
question went very similar to the
question we did asked today. There were
a bunch of friends by a wedding. They
were around the table having a lovely,
lovely
time. And slowly but surely, some of
them got
drunk and it happens from time to time.
There's usually good alcohol around. You
know, when's the last time you've had
a Macallen 21? It's an exciting moment.
And they started, sorry for those who
don't know which scotch I'm talking
about, but it's a lovely, lovely one.
And they started to drink. It's a very,
very nice occasion. And they started to
drink and they became very very drunk
and one of them in his drunkenness
smashed something and a little piece
went into his friend's eye and cause
lots of damage as a shot of glass would
do in somebody's
eye. So they asked the bach is he liable
for his
damage? And this person who was drunk
said what do you want? I'm drunk. How
how can you tell me I'm drunk? I had no
no type of control over any of my
actions when I was so drunk. This is the
argument being put forward by this very
drunk person who hadn't seen Macallen in
too
long.
So the Bach says if you think that's a
good argument, think again.
N why he asks it as a casher he asks it
first says like this I the Gmorra says
that somebody who's drunk a shik shalo
he is totally totally hammered he has no
idea he's not aware of his actions
that's the way the shenan puts such a
drunk then he's got a dinner of a shita
he's got it's gone the mere fact of his
statement then it shows that he was
aware of his actions why rea his
statement when he made a statement. He
was fine. Let's get the date line. A
date line. What's a good day for a
wedding? Tuesday. Let's go Tuesday.
Tuesday's a good day for a wedding,
right? They get this guy gets drunk on
Tuesday. He smashes a glass thing, goes
into his friend eye. The next day, yeah,
I'll give him a date to sober up.
Thursday, right, Wednesday's still in
bed. Poor fellow.
Thursday, Mr. Levy calls our drunk
fellow and he steps in into Bdon. He
comes into the
Bzdon. Mr. Levy says, "You see this eye?
You can't see it. Neither can I because
it's not
here. It's because of him. A piece of
glass went into it." And this guy who's
he knows how to walk now because it's
been a day or two. And he says, "Do you
know how drunk I was? Do you know how
drunk I was on
Tuesday? He's putting forward this
argument. I wasn't aware of my
actions. You're not happy.
I look I I can hear such an argument. If
somebody's to a state he doesn't he's
not aware of anything he's doing. I can
hear such an
argument. And he asks he asks it in a
question. This question is the
says that somebody who's has a den of a
his way evaluate his intelligence and
his halas his laws the way we treat him
is like a sher somebody who's mentally
challenged somebody mentally challenged
we quoted the mission before pigosen ra
if you meet a cotton a minor if you meet
a sha somebody's mentally challenged
pigosen ra bad news it's not a good
meeting. Why? Cuz if you damage them, if
they damage you, they're potter. Why?
Cuz they're not. So they're not
responsible. Whatever the reason is. So
ask the if the says he's got a
dinner, we said the mission
is somebody who's mentally challenged.
He's potter from all damages. So this
person the shar says he's he's got a
dinner of a he's got the law of a. So
how can you how can I now tell you that
it's not an argument the fact that you
were so drunk the itself says he's got a
dinner this is the question which he
challenges his ruling and he explains
like
this that that it says in the brier
sorry where are the it is 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 lines up. It's in the middle of the
line. It
says as after he's asked the question,
excuse the print. You got it? Yeah.
And it is not. So this is not a good
argument to ask a question from the fact
that the says he is a why says
the gar doesn't
say that when someone reaches the level
of drunkenness like
he's only to
those that it says clearly In the
bryer
mecha it says business dealings misa the
death penalty or malus and the penalty
that you get
[Music]
lashes damages it never spoke about in
the garan it was never it was never a
discussion says you're for sure you're
for sure liable he's got to answer the
question why he's different to
a
says he was liable before he became a
before he became the person who's not
aware of his actions at all. He was
liable then and he should have made sure
not to get drunk. He's not like somebody
who's mentally challenged because before
you became a shik shalo which you then
we say you are mentally challenged. You
should have been careful
then.
Timeline 6:00 in the evening at the
beginning beginning of the wedding. This
guy's walking straight. He looks like a
respectable individual. He's saying
hello to people he hasn't met in a long
time. 7:00 he sees the Macallen. He
starts drinking. 8:00 he's a little bit
tipsy. 9:00 he's shiko he's totally
unaware of what he's doing says the b
who who asked you to get so drunk who
gave you the permission to get so drunk
true now you're like a but before you
weren't like a that
responsibility before is what's m that's
what says that you're liable it's what
happened before at the time it's true
what do you want from me I'm a shiko
what do you want comes into saying I
wasn't aware the back turned around him
says no. It's true at the time you
weren't aware but beforehand you had
responsibility for your actions that
makes you liable even when you're like
a cuz you in yourself have
responsibilities. So even at the time
you're not you're not able to make
decisions you're not aware of your
decisions doesn't make no
difference. Beautiful piece from the
back. Let's let's finish it inside. He's
he's he's going to take it to the next
level. Let's see
it. We should have this is five lines
up. He should have been careful at the
beginning that he doesn't get drunk
like and damages the
public who forced you who who encouraged
you to get so
drunk so
much that you don't know what you're
doing. The
given since this extreme accident,
extreme out of control incident that
your shik happened because of
yourself. This is what we've just said.
You are the one who put yourself into
the situation. It's your problem. What
do you want? This is where he he says a
he says a extra level here.
Even somebody who's
sleeping that it's not possible to be
alive without
sleep. Even this fellow who's asleep is
liable for his actions and says that
somebody who's sleeping, he's got to
sleep. Before he goes to sleep, he's got
an expensive vase next to him. There is
he has no option but to go to sleep
because he's he's got to have kus guy
doesn't sleep how long can you not go
for sleep for a day two days 3 days if
you want to get in the Guinness World
Records maybe 3 weeks but after that
you're just falling on the floor it's
not possible says the back the guy who's
going to sleep he has to sleep he must
sleep but he's
still says the says
the it's
All the more so someone who's drunk to
have a pusher go, he's totally totally
negligent. Somebody somebody who's
getting drunk, he has a choice whether
to get drunk or not. I could I could
not. It's up to me. I can choose whether
to get drunk. I could choose whether or
not to get drunk. But somebody who's
going to sleep, he has to go to sleep.
There's no two ways about it. So if we
say somebody who goes to sleep whilst
he's asleep, he's liable for what he
does. All the more so somebody who gets
so drunk that he doesn't know what he's
doing just like someone who's sleeping
he's going to be he's going to be
liable. Why? Cuz who asked you to get
drunk? It was your choice. It was your
choice whether to get
drunk. That's what the B
says. Later in the B ch he talks about
even even even if you want to say that
you're not liable for damages. Let's say
if you want to argue to me, no, the gar
does mean it. And somebody who's so
drunk, he's like a even if you want to
say such a
thing, then you have to bring a proof
that you're so
drunk. So, it's a fine line. It's a very
fine line between somebody who's drunk
and extremely drunk. That's the times
when a person is drunk. I'm not talking
from experience, you Oh, that's why the
police officers are walking in a
straight line. There you go. If a police
officer sees you, he's just walking a
straight line. He's got to make sure I
see. It's the reason they have to they
have to they find some kind of
uh they have to they have to they have
to determine if they actually you're on
the right you qualify to be a real
drunk. It's not. It's not. So, and even
if you can't walk in a straight line,
shiko is more than that. Shik shalo is
could you crawl in a straight line? All
right. If you can't crawl in a straight
line, then you're probably
shikoy. So, the back says you're going
to have to bring a proof even if even if
it's not true. So, let's go back to the
two questions we started off
with. First question is, Mr. Cohen, Mrs.
Cohen,
sorry. Mrs. K is very
upset. Somebody has smashed a vase
whilst he's
drunk after seeing this. I think it
would depend.
No, actually think he wouldn't depend.
It wouldn't depend. If he's drunk,
you're
always you smashed it. You're always
nothing to talk about.
Let's go to the next
case. What's the next case? We have a
rich Mr. Levy who gave my friends
$50,000. And he says that I mean it. I'd
never give Braim that I've never seen
before to Yeshiva that I don't know
about $50,000 is a lot of
money. So he called up Morash and he
says, "I want to go back."
What do we tell such a
fellow? So the gamarra before was
discussing
matis actually the gar doesn't bring the
brings it
into it says matis if he's drunk a
regular drunk then his matonis even
though he's drunk is cayam nothing to do
about it he gave something you were
drunk doesn't make a difference if he's
shikit then he's potter if he's shik
he's got dinner it's not like azuk It's
not like damage. Matonis giving a
present is different. Why is it
different? You're not damaging. We don't
have the reasons of the
Yammer things are going to get haywire.
Um we don't say by matonus that you for
like an extreme accident. We don't say
we don't say you're still going to be
liable. Matonus are different to
Hezek. So those those is is going to be
the answer to those two questions
seemingly. Oh, you're like, "Oh no,
what's he gonna do now?"
Seemingly. However, we're not going to
go into this. There's another entire
discussion about
doing damages on purin. When one does
damages and purim
there's a special pure there's a special
exemption because it's called the pur is
mma sim if somebody damages because of
exha but this simka has to be that it's
a regular simka we don't have time to go
into this then he's going to be potter
and it depends the magnav brings down
that if it's a hezigle so it's a really
expensive vase then it won't be
included. You'd have to pay for that.
Some some posts say that if it's it only
means if it's a if it's a damage to an
item, but if somebody knocks his eye out
or something like that where it's a to
somebody's body, he's going to be That's
right. That's right.
That's a good job. So, that is what
Yeah. So that is today's discussion come
to a close. If it's not on Purim, it
seems to be this guy who gives a
donation even though he's drunk would be
to keep to it. If the secret he's part
of keeping to it if somebody damages
when he's drunk he would always be. If
it's on por it's another discussion
depends on all different things. Thank
you.
Sure.
My
[Music]
birthday
sh Oh my n my