Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Who Really Is the Antichrist? Rabbi Singer Reveals the Truth
14,210 views
Help us combat aggressive Jewish evangelism in Israel: https://outreachjudaism.org/partners/ Let’s Get Biblical Study Guide (Volume 1 & 2) https://outreachjudaism.org/shop/lets-get-biblical-expanded-2-volume-study-guide/ https://outreachjudaism.org/ www.videvo.net https://www.youtube.com/user/tenaktalk Music: https://www.purple-planet.com Use in accordance with Israel's Copyright Law 5768-2007 section 27a. Music at the end: Adon Olam https://youtu.be/a6oS9N0hJTY http://www.toviasinger.tv/ #toviasinger #Judaism #Christianity #Messiah #joerogan
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
There will be a person before Jesus
makes his second coming who the Jews
will set up as the Messiah in a temple
and then they're going to worship him,
but he really is Satan. I beg you
regardless of the Bible you have in
front of you, whether it has a cross or
a star of David on its cover,
read Zechariah 8:23 and they'll worship
him as a divine being. Isn't that
exactly what the church did with Jesus?
>> [snorts]
>> Okay, David, you're live on air. Go
ahead and present your question to Rabbi
Singer.
>> Yep, thanks. Hi, I'm uh David from
Detroit, Michigan and uh so my question
is um basically
I was a Pentecostal for most of my life
and I realized
um recently
that some Christians believe, you know,
the third temple, they say is the
quote unquote synagogue of Satan.
And then other Christians will say, "Oh,
well, it's just symbolic. It's not a
physical real thing." So, my question
would be, which I
feel like I should know this, but
um if they're referring to Revelations,
are they like overriding Zechariah? I
mean, are they trying to fit Zechariah
into Revelations?
Or are they
just kind of saying that Zechariah
doesn't matter anymore and this is all
going straight to Revelations?
>> This is the problem of the church. Its
core teachings are incompatible with
Tanakh.
But as it turns out, the Book of
Revelation, as an example, was probably
I wanted to say almost certainly,
but that's very strong, but I'll say it
was probably written about 94.
What is um germane is that the when the
Book of Revelation was written, we don't
Well, we know his first name. His name
was John. We don't know who was.
But whoever wrote it, there was no
temple during his time.
When he referred to that the Jews are
not
Jews in the synagogue is a synagogue of
Satan, Revelation chapter 2 verse 9 and
3 verse 9. He wasn't talking about the
temple.
The problem with the teachings of the
church is again, they're just they don't
They There's no point of contact between
its teachings and Tanakh. In Tanakh,
we're very much told that there will be
a temple
in Jerusalem. We're given its
boundaries, its its dimensions, its
windows,
exactly where it will be built. It's the
most
There's no question that the end of the
book of Ezekiel
is the most contains the most saturated
copious details of the Messianic Age in
all of Tanakh, and there is no parallel
to it.
That's a big statement. Just the way it
is. If you want to know about the events
that will occur in the Messianic Age,
you can just start reading Ezekiel 34 to
the end,
and you will realize what is happening
now. And it's easy, very easy to
understand. And we're told told about
the Messiah, the prince himself, who's
going to be a sin offering on behalf of
himself, and they pay for unintentional
sins. Ezekiel Ezekiel chapter 45 verse
20 and 22, the full resumption of the
sacrificial system in full order in
these pastures. These are not
If you read it for yourself, and won't
take a lot of reading, this is not a
symbol or sign any of those things. This
is very literal, material, just as the
war between Israel and Persia.
Very literal and it's unfolding now is
kind of been put on some kind of a
pause, but it's real the restoration of
the Jews to their land and I find it
unattractive
when these Christians will take the
Hebrew Bible literally
when when the Bible prohibits
homosexuality and cross-dressing.
Then they take it literally or when the
Torah talks about giving ties so then
churches love to take ties and they take
that very very little literally and that
the church loves but other things they
sort of spiritualize.
So
this idea is complete nonsense. Now the
idea of an Antichrist
is nowhere in Tanakh. I didn't say the
word Antichrist. I'm just the idea of an
Antichrist is nowhere in Tanakh. What is
an Antichrist?
Okay.
An Antichrist is the height of dualism.
So I'm going to explain this to you in
the following way because the term
Antichrist actually appears in the
Epistles of John. It does not appear in
the Book of Revelation. The term
Antichrist doesn't appear in the book of
but the concept is in the Book of
Revelation as an example chapter 13.
The Antichrist not by name but is in 2
Thessalonians as a son of perdition
chapter 2. A very significant chapter of
the church and I need your attention.
Just focus very carefully. The term
Antichrist could be used in the
Christian Bible just to refer to anyone
who is against Christianity, okay? And
that's the Epistles of John strikingly
is using it that way and speaks about
Antichrist in the plural, Antichrists.
So,
to make this point,
when Christians use the term Antichrist
in a way, a rhetorical way, they just
talk about anyone who's against
Christianity like Luther and Calvin said
the
the Pope to be the Antichrist. They
didn't mean he was the Antichrist,
just he's against the teachings of
Jesus. So, in that case, the word
Antichrist
is not capitalized. So, the word
Antichrist in the English language can
either be capitalized or not
capitalized. When it's not capitalized,
it means anybody who is Antichrist.
So, we're going to set that aside, but
Antichrist can be capitalized.
And when it's capitalized, it means
something more specific. It's important
to understand this. Again, this is
nothing to do with the Tanakh.
When the Messiah comes, everybody gets
it. That's the whole point of Messiah,
that that all the nations will know that
Hashem is Lord, and all nations will
serve the Messiah. See Daniel chapter 7,
verse 13 and 14. So, everybody's going
to recognize that the Messiah is king,
and God is going to give him what he
didn't have. He's going to give him
sovereignty, and he's going to give him
honor and so on. And that means he's not
God cuz he's receiving this from the
Ancient of Days. This is very, very
critical, okay? So, you will like
Okay. So, there's no such thing of
Antichrist. The whole idea is that
and especially this
um
is um 2 Thessalonians. This comes This
comes in It's This idea is going to be
developed and developed further,
further, further by the church fathers.
So, I'll tell you what a um a large
number of Christians believe. And that
is that there will be a person before
Jesus makes his own coming who the Jews
will set up as the Messiah in a temple,
and then they're going to worship him,
but he really is Satan.
Okay? So, this comes up loosely in 2
Thessalonians. The
final battle between Jesus and the
Antichrist, you'll find as an example in
the book of Revelation, for sure.
This is going to be spun heavily by the
church fathers. Irenaeus is example. The
person who takes this next level to the
full
iteration of the Antichrist as
Christians, both Catholic and
Protestant,
view it is um
Cyril of Jerusalem. He was a a church
father, venerated both by the East and
the West. He lived in the 4th century.
He's a contemporary of of the Council of
Nicaea, of all that stuff. So, he's
living at a very critical juncture in
Christian history, and he was fiercely
anti-Jewish.
Like all the church fathers. What makes
some people who are anti-Jewish very
dangerous is they're they're prolific
writers, and then if or
speakers as John Chrysostom was. These
are people, unfortunately, who wrote a
lot and wrote well, and made up stuff,
and the church was really seized by
their teachings. In this case of a
a orthodox
a Christian I'm using the word orthodox
here lower case. So, an orthodox
Christian
Catholic church father who's revered
also by the
by the Eastern Church. The key point is
this is all complete nonsense in that
when the true Messiah comes, the Jews
aren't going to worship Satan. The whole
world is going to
embrace the truth of the God of Abraham,
Isaac, and Jacob. And 10
people who are not Jewish of different
languages and nations will recognize
that the Jewish people all along had the
truth. I beg you, regardless of the
Bible you have in front of you, whether
has a cross or a star of David on its
cover,
read Zechariah 8:23.
We find the exact opposite that the
nations will come and grab a hold of the
Jew and say, "N'halcha imachem, ki
sham'anu Elohim imachem. Let us go with
you for we have heard that God is with
you." So, everything they're saying is
completely the opposite. Now, this
notion of an Antichrist
sits well and is
compatible with the dualistic beliefs in
the pagan world, with Gnosticism. A
world which was filled, saturated with
the powers of light and the powers of
darkness. That's what Zoroastrianism
is.
Gnosticism. Well, that was the This is
the way people thought in the ancient
world. That there were And it's
understandable cuz in the ancient world
people
encountered
horrible things all around them.
And they
>> [snorts]
>> encountered blessings, a good harvest
and a dead wife and
uh rain and animals that won't give
milk. And they didn't understand why
this was happening. So, they figured
there must have been a a good god and a
bad god. There must have been a
the great god and the demiurge using
platonic thinking. This is the way this
is there's no such thing as an
Antichrist. But the notion that the at
the end of days the Jews would build a
temple and would
have a Messiah but that Messiah is the
Antichrist capital A and Jews would
worship but he's really the devil he's
really Satan. That's second
Thessalonians. That's why there have
been Christians that said um
that said that the Antichrist will be a
Jew which Christians believe. But that's
where it comes from. There's really this
idea is in second Thessalonians full
disclosure.
Although second Thessalonians purports
to be written by Paul many people think
it wasn't really written by him.
Not germane. Christians believe that he
wrote it. Whether he did or not is not a
subject of this topic because that's a
big part of the this picture of the
Antichrist. The question we need to ask
as people who love the God of Israel
want to worship in truth is what does
Tanakh say? What does the Hebrew Bible
say? The Hebrew Bible says that the
Gentiles will come to the Jews and say
we made a mistake. Now we know God is
with you. Well, if we're worshipping the
Antichrist and we're wrong about
everything including the Trinity and the
doctrine of the incarnation and
vicarious. We're wrong about everything
and our father is the devil John 8:44.
Why at the end of days pray tell
why would the Gentiles come to the Jews
and say
we're we're wrong and now we know you're
right. The Jews should be coming to the
non-Jews to the Christians saying now we
know that God is with you. So I always
say my dear brothers and sisters
go back to the original. Go back to the
Hebrew scriptures. They're accessible to
you in a way they haven't been in
history in that in the ancient world if
you want to read Tanakh you would have
to have one that was written
by hand. That's what the word manuscript
means, and there was no publishing, no
There was no books that were printed.
That didn't start till about 500 years
ago. Now, you can go online and read it
for yourself. Do that. If you read the
Hebrew Bible, if you are filled with the
spirit of Hashem that
that rests on every person that's
devoted to Hashem, if you bow before
him, if you praise only him, if you need
bend stand alone, then Hashem is with
you. Just go to the original scriptures.
Then no Christian can rob you of your
faith with God or claim that the Jews
are going to worship the Antichrist. I
got to say one more thing.
Okay? This part is crazy.
This part is nuts.
But I might as well say it. Okay,
there's no First, I must say, so there's
no Antichrist.
There isn't There's no such thing.
However, I would be remiss if I didn't
say this.
This is such a projection
of a sort that
I hope you can wrap your brain around
this.
The Jews, the Christians say, will
worship a false Messiah, and they'll
worship him as a divine being. Isn't
that exactly what the church did with
Jesus? It's so striking that what they
blame us for doing or what we're about
to do is exactly what they did. Now, I'm
not claiming that Jesus is the
Antichrist. I'm just saying you can't
You'd have to be blind, deaf, and dumb
not to have noticed that
what the core teachings of the church is
to worship a man who's not the Messiah,
to hold him up as the savior,
and to worship him as a god, and saying
he's our temple.
Look, if you've never heard of
Christianity and you've been living in
Borough Park, so this will be unfamiliar
to you.
But, if you're familiar with any of the
teachings of the church, you say, "Wow."
So, I'm not saying that Jesus is the
Antichrist, but it is odd that what they
blame the Jews for, again, is precisely
what the church is guilty of. I rest my
case.
If you enjoyed this program,
please like and subscribe.
>> Adonai [singing]
asher malchuto
>> [singing]
[music]
[singing]