0:00 / 0:00
The Jewish Story: 1949 Boundary Issues - part I
442 views
In 1949 Israel was in the dangerous position of winning the battle and losing the war. Though ceasefire agreements were in place, peace remained elusive. This episode opens an examination of the questions of international legitimacy, national cohesion and border conflicts which characterize the state even today.
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
daring to set boundaries says brené
Brown is about having the courage to
love ourselves even when we risk
disappointing others well I'm not afraid
to this point I've got a fair bit of
self-love and I like to push boundaries
because I'm Roth Mike Feuer and this is
the Jewish story episode 5 1949 boundary
issues the ongoing struggle for
statehood so when I was growing up my
dad used to say to me all the time be
careful what you wish for Mike because
you might just get it and I know it may
be a little bit scary to contemplate or
at least sound somewhat cynical but
seeing as so many people today Jew and
non-jew alike are starting to cast
doubtful glances our way here in the
state of Israel we have to consider the
question is this what we wished for and
before I get started
cuz frankly it's a conversation that
will follow us through much of season 3
I want to put my cards on the table
we've come a long way in the Jewish
story 2500 years in fact and there's no
period we've discussed so far that I
would want to live in more than the
present and it's actually because I feel
that way and because I actually believe
the best is yet to come for I'm Israel
and the world that I need to tell a
challenging story because redemption
looks very neat in the abstract and I'm
sure that in the depths of exile the
return to being a sovereign people in
our land look like the answer to all our
problems but I'm confident you've begun
to sense at this point of season 3 that
the Jewish story is not exempt from the
fact that every solution comes with its
own host of challenges now Zionism in my
eyes is the movement for Jewish National
embodiment and the State of Israel its
most concrete product and as such its
subject to the problem of embodiment in
both its primary manifestations we've
spoken about it before the first issue
with all embodied phenomena is the edge
it may sound obvious but anything
embodied in the real world has edges and
that means on some level it's absurd you
know this is an example I've given you
before that when my 11 year old daughter
first began to push back against the
rules of modesty in my house which I try
to hold at the elbow in the knee and she
held her shirt there and she pulled it
down over the elbows and she said really
Ava that's okay and pulled it back and
said but this isn't that's okay this
isn't I looked at her and I laughed and
I said you've just uncovered one of the
fundamental problems that we all have
because a value is nothing but worthless
abstraction until you embody it in the
world but once you do someone's always
going to be able to challenge it about
the absurdity of where is the edge I
mean if that doesn't make sense you just
think of a municipal boundary the city
of Jerusalem ends here why I can stand
on one side the other what's
fundamentally different and the answer
is if it's going to be a city it has to
have edge or a country and that very
edge is what forces us to fight to make
our value real in the world because I'm
not willing to point and say crossing
this line is a violation of whatever of
a value or a border and I question
whether the issue at hand is really a
value for me and whether the country is
actually real and as you're probably
beginning to sense we as a people and a
nation state have major boundary issues
the second manifestation of the problem
of embodiment is course life is messy
because only philosophical abstractions
are perfect anything organic and growing
is bound to make a mess and in fact it's
our imperfections that allow us to grow
and evolve but we can only do so if
we're able to hold the tension between
accepting ourselves for what we are
while simultaneously committing to be
what we can be there are lots of people
out there who want perfect or nothing
and so when they look at the state be it
now or back in 1949 they chose nothing
because it wasn't perfect others are
willing to settle for what they have now
and they'll never see Redemption this is
good enough never got us anywhere but an
organic embodied people that wants to
not only survive but thrive has to plow
through the messiness of life toward
that vision that were meant to birth in
the world in this episode
I want to begin a discussion of the
boundary issues that mom Israel has now
really there are three ways that we can
hold that boundary one is international
legitimacy and we'll touch today a
little bit on the United Nations in the
cold war and international context of
the new state
another one is national cohesion the
formation of a character that is truly
Israeli but you see this person they're
Israeli that one is not that's one of
the defining characteristics of a nation
and the third one will just be the raw
fact that if you're a nation-state you
gotta have borders you might remember
that in the discussions leading up to
the Declaration of Independence back
there at the end of season two Ben
Gurion refused actually to define the
borders of the state that he was about
to declare and he did it by pointing out
that the UN which did nothing to
implement the partition plan of
resolution 181 and the Arabs who
declared war on Israel had basically
torn up any map to which Israel had
committed he said we don't know what
will happen if the UN stands its ground
we won't fight the UN but if the UN
doesn't act in the Arabs waged war
against us and we fought them and we
then take the Western Galilee in both
sides of the corridor to Jerusalem all
this will become part of the state if we
have sufficient force why commit
ourselves and so ben-gurion set his new
state on a path to establishing borders
through the fortunes of war and not
through a sense of international
legitimacy math going to have a lot of
consequences in the episodes ahead one
wonders how he'd feel to know 71 years
later that the pattern still holds true
because as we're going to begin to
discuss the State of Israel has boundary
issues you know I remember when at the
height of the Second Intifada also known
as the Asda War the US government sent
yet another special envoy to the Middle
East in hopes of bringing about peace it
might have been George Mitchell I can't
exactly remember who and I was sitting
reading about it in a Jerusalem Post
newspaper and I saw that there was a
cartoon along with it it showed Mitchell
a stack of papers in his hands trooping
with
undue optimism toward the Middle East
and about this step in a big pile of a
dog poo and that's because there's a
long history to the hopes that a foreign
negotiator could somehow broker peace
here in the Middle East it was always a
healthy dose of the colonial attitude
that we in the region could never hope
to get it right without some American or
European to hold our hands or spank us
when we wouldn't obey and really that
history began before the state was fully
board already on the 20th of May in 1948
less than a week after the outbreak of
Israel's war independence and the
declaration of independence there was a
UN resolution which appointed count
folke Bernadotte United Nations mediator
in Palestine now you have to remember in
1948 the UN itself is a relatively new
body and it's looking to establish
itself as an alternative to war and
international power politics and frankly
has already succeeded in giving the
sample of legitimacy because the United
Nations means that anyone who is a
nation is legitimate in the world and
anyone who's not part of the club is not
so there's a feeling that it was UN
resolution 181 that had actually created
the State of Israel now that was a
feeling that the Arabs might have shared
in the sense that well one resolution
can create another one could destroy but
it was a feeling that Israel rejected
it's not just the whole history of the
relationship between the Jewish people
and the Land of Israel don't forget that
the partition plan and the war of
independence were preceded by more than
a decade of Jewish struggle against
foreign rule in the land and whether it
was the British or the United Nations
Security Council we weren't interested
in repeating that folly
so Bernadotte was actually a Swedish
diplomat originally he'd made his name
negotiating the release of Allied
prisoners from German concentration
camps including by the way several
hundred Jews from Tracy and Scott and
he'd been chosen right after World War
two before the outbreak of the war by
the newly formed United Nations Security
Council to be a mediator in the Arab
Jewish conflict that everyone saw on the
horizon and he was asked to dedicate
himself to a new model of pose
colonial international politics and with
net dedication he couldn't possibly know
that he'd pay with his life and already
during the first truce in June of 1948
Bernadotte identified the barriers to
peace and they haven't really changed
since number one he said that the Arab
world's rejection of the existence of a
Jewish state was a major barrier to
solving the conflicts whatever its
borders would be number two he said that
what he called Israel's new philosophy
based on its increasing military
strength of ignoring the UN sanction
bounders in conquering whatever
additional territory it could I would
point out to him that it's consistent
with the entire Zionist pattern of you
know redeeming the land of Israel number
three was the Arab refugee problem which
already in June of 1948 he saw as a
critical issue in the time ahead now
that first truce as we know proved to be
nothing more than a chance for both
sides to catch their breath and fighting
resumed and a few months later another
truce came about and this time count
Bernadotte brought a comprehensive
proposal to both sides of the battle he
ditched basically resolution 181 that
partition plan we spoken about and
rather recommended that the final
boundaries should reflect the military a
letís on the ground the Galilee should
go to the newborn State of Israel and
the Negev would be awarded to Arab
Palestine but contrary to the partition
plan this Palestine was no longer to be
an independent state it would be annexed
to Transjordan along with the mountains
of Judea and Samaria that's the West
Bank that the Jordanians had seized
right at the outset of the war and
bernadotte's plan calls the repatriation
of all refugees in the
internationalization of Jerusalem
finally in recognition of the bad blood
that existed between the warring parties
he recommended that a Palestine
conciliation commission be established
to oversee and carry out any UN plan it
sounds like a lot I know but documents
that were unearthed much later show that
the Israeli government the provisional
government at that point never intended
to accept the plan
they were unwilling to sacrifice at the
peace table what they've won on the
battlefield
nevertheless they may
show of considering it it's not so easy
just shrug off the institutions of
international diplomacy meanwhile the
radical elements of the former
underground had labeled the UN mediator
as an agent of Britain's ongoing
colonial aspirations and as overly
sympathetic to the Arab cause and
finally as a deadly threat to the
survival of the new nation and we know
that wouldn't end well and that's why on
Friday September 17th bernadotte's
motorcade was ambushed by a four-man
team of latvia assassins as it drove
through jerusalem and burn enough murder
is actually a complex story in its own
right maybe someday I'll get a chance to
tell it but for now I just want you to
know that his death didn't stop the war
or halt the peace because he was
replaced by his assistant American Ralph
Bunche who in his wisdom shifted away
from the idea of a comprehensive peace
plan to negotiating separate armistice
agreements between Israel and the
so-called confrontation States that's
Egypt Lebanon Jordan and Syria all the
borders around the new state remember an
armistice is not a peace it's basically
a glorified ceasefire and that's why the
lines the so-called 1948 borders of
Israel on borders at all their ceasefire
lines they're basically where we managed
to fight to and they managed to fight to
and where we all ground to a halt the
so-called green line that separates the
West Bank Judea and Samaria from the
rest of the State of Israel is green
because that's the marker they used to
draw it on the Armistice map even though
bernadotte's vision for a peace plan
didn't succeed nevertheless it didn't
disappear because remember one of the
ways in which any state then and now
gains its boundaries it's through
international legitimacy and so only a
few months after his assassination the
United Nations voted on UN resolution
194 they haven't come so far from 181 I
guess it consists of 15 articles and
we're not going to go through it all
because most of them focus on the sort
of substance and process of that
Palestine conciliation commission that
he recommended in which indeed created
the Commission
actually eventually convened the luzon
conference from April through September
1949 in Lausanne Switzerland right it
was a the first in many attempts failed
attempts to pursue peace through
international diplomacy there's no need
to go into all the details of luzon but
a couple of critical issues did come out
of resolution 194 and the process that
it birthed first was the codification of
an international claim to Jerusalem one
of the Articles resolves that in view of
its association with three world
religions the Jerusalem area should be
accorded special and separate treatment
from the rest of Palestine and should be
placed under effective United Nations
control now I have to say at this point
in the Jewish story the idea that the
nations of the world had any claim to
Jerusalem much less that I was going to
trust them I in the figurative of course
to be impartial protectors of the
so-called three religions just kind of
sticks in my throat and apparently Prime
Minister David ben-gurion felt exactly
the same way because his response to
this once again international claim to
Jerusalem was simple and direct
soon after lose an peace conference
broke up in failure he just moved all
the Israeli government offices from Tel
Aviv to Jerusalem and when voices some
from within his own party protesters the
new state couldn't afford to alienate
the whole world by rejecting a decision
that had been taken by a majority of the
General Assembly of the UN this is what
he replied in his Knesset speech as you
know the General Assembly of the United
Nations has by a large majority decided
to place Jerusalem under an
international regime as a separate
entity it is to be hoped that the
General Assembly will in the course of
time amend the error which is majority
has made and will make no attempt to
impose a regime on the holy city against
the will of its people in the stress of
war when Jerusalem was under siege we
were compelled to establish the seat of
government in hoc area at Tel Aviv but
for the State of Israel there has always
been and always will be one capital only
Jerusalem
the eternal thus it was 3000 years ago
and thus it will be we believe until the
end of time so the other fundamental
concept that it's worth mentioning from
resolution 191 is the refugee issue it
resolves that the refugees wishing to
return to their homes and live at peace
with their neighbors should be permitted
to do so at the earliest practical date
and that compensation should be paid for
the property of those choosing not to
return now the Arab states showed no
interest in absorbing the hundreds of
thousands of their brothers who'd fled
and were driven out during the war
unlike as we detailed in the last couple
episodes what Israel did with the
refugees from Europe and the Arab lands
but let's be clear they also had no
interest in creating a state of
Palestine for them either and that
obvious from the nature of the
negotiations that took place at the
loosen conference I mean Egypt was
demanding that Israel cede the Negev to
them to them not to create a separate
state in fact the only real attempt at a
compromise was around the Gaza Strip
which even in 1949 was filled with
refugees and political hot potato that
no one wanted Egypt was unwilling to
annex the strip and its inhabitants
explicitly stating that they were
uninterested in creating a separate
political entity between them in the new
State of Israel it was actually
ben-gurion who proposed absorbing the
strip and it's refugees into Israel an
idea which eventually collapsed and
sounds quite interesting in the light of
everything that's happening today but
add to that
Jordan's eventual annexation of the West
Bank and the extension of citizenship to
the populace and you can see a very
important point that from luzon on all
the way through the aftermath of 1967
war the goal of the Arab states was to
expand their own territory not to create
a state called Palestine that was a
tactic that they would come up with much
later but nevertheless politics aside
there are still hundreds of thousands of
refugees that Israel wouldn't accept
back and the Arabs refused to absorb and
so Unruh was born the United Nations
Relief and Works Agency for Palestine
refugees in the near
another mouthful just call it unruhe it
was established in December of 1949
right after the breakup of Luzon
conference and Unruh actually the only
UN agency which is dedicated to helping
refugees from a specific region or
conflict it exists separate from what's
called the UN High Commission on
refugees because the UN High Commission
has a specific mandate to aid refugees
by integration into their country of
residence resettlement in a third
country or array paid through Asian when
possible under on the other hand
provides relief and social services in
place not only that but it allows
refugee status to be inherited by some
descendants as opposed to being lost in
the case of UN High Commission of
refugees I don't want to get into the
controversy over Unruh right now if
you've been following the news during
the Trump administration it's taken some
serious blows but it's symptomatic of
the take away we need to have from Luzon
conference and that is the setting of a
pattern of zero consequence warfare it's
an idea that dominated thinking about
the region ever since basically the Arab
world could wage a war of aggression
lose and then insists that Israel
returned to status quo ante without any
consequences and the major victims of
that of course were the hundreds of
thousands of refugees who were frozen in
place you know in a speech before the
Knesset actually during the Luzon
conference Israeli foreign minister
Moshe Sharett
warned against the consequences to the
international community of accepting
this kind of thinking he said why indeed
to the Arab states be considered
entitled to territorial compensation
whoever wittingly or unwittingly
encourages the Arab states to believe
that they may succeed in squeezing
concessions from Israel and getting by
political pressure what they failed the
game by a war of aggression will not be
serving the cause of peace in the Middle
East that's a headline that could have
been printed yesterday that being said
it's also important to recognize how
Israel hardened its stance in the
process of luzon there gonna be a number
of other efforts at peace public private
domestic international that
we made all through the 1950s and every
single one of them will fail and each
historian blames who they will for that
failure but all of them recognize that
Israel was unwilling at this point to
compromise on any territorial or
demographic game it had made in the 1948
war as I said why lose the peace if you
feel you won the war so you add that the
inflexible position that the Arab states
were largely unwilling to accept the
Jewish state in their midst no matter
what it's boarded and throw in the
instability generated by the refugee
issue will see that Israel may have won
the battle for independence but the war
is far from over
so we touched in the last segment about
the failure of un-led diplomacy in the
Middle East and I'm sure it bruised some
egos but the breakup of luzon conference
and the ongoing instability in the
Middle East didn't threaten the
existence of the UN the Western powers
however saw things otherwise because the
UN wasn't the only new global reality
that was born out of wolf work - on
March 12 1947 u.s. President Harry
Truman appeared before a joint session
of Congress and in an 18 minute speech
laid out what became known as the Truman
Doctrine I believe it must be the policy
of the United States he said to support
free peoples who are resisting attempted
subjugation by armed minorities or by
outside pressures I believe that we must
assist free peoples to work out their
own destinies in their own way I believe
that our help
should be primarily through economic and
financial aid which is essential to
economic stability in orderly political
processes it sounds great in fact only a
year later the US Congress approved
what's called the Marshall Plan that was
the American initiative that devoted 12
billion dollars to the reconstruction of
Western Europe but the fact that I said
Western Europe should tip off to you
what this was really about the Soviet
Union was offered but they refused any
of this assistance they even blocked
many of the newly so-called Eastern Bloc
countries from
leaving the American aide that's because
the Truman Doctrine was the opening shot
in the Cold War and the world was
quickly beginning to choose sides or to
be placed on one and the Middle East was
no exception if the content between is
only Arab States couldn't be resolved
through an international peace treaty
then the Western powers felt it needed
to be managed through Cold War politics
and so in 1950 the United States the
United Kingdom and France issued what's
known as the tripartite declaration
which was their commitment to guarantee
the territorial status quo that had been
determined by the 1949 arab-israeli
armistice agreements and this is how the
ceasefire lines of 1948 became sacred
the failure of the international
diplomacy of the United Nations didn't
stop the reality of Cold War power
politics from solidifying the situation
in the Middle East because the Western
powers were looking to maintain
stability above all and of course the
free flow of oil out of Middle East and
perhaps if possible to convince Arabs
and Israelis to make common cause with
the West against the Soviet Union and if
not at least prevent any part of the
Middle East from being taken by force
and that last piece the fear of force
was what led to setting up what was
known as the Near East Arms Coordinating
Committee in 1942 here there's a whole
story of arms in the Middle East we
could tell Albert Einstein once said one
has to realize that the powerful
industrial groups concerned in the
manufacture of arms are doing their best
in all countries to prevent the peaceful
settlement of international disputes it
may sound a bit cynical but you have to
take his words seriously I mean can you
really believe that the major powers of
the world are a wholeheartedly dedicated
to peace in the Middle East when they're
making so much money off of selling arms
to both sides and that's without even
going into the domestic arms industry
nevertheless the control of arms is one
way to control a conflict or at least
manage it if not
solve it the u.s. at the time was
selling almost no arms in Middle East
it was Britain in France that owned the
market and they had considerable
competition between them both an
economic and political fronts in many
ways this was just a new form of
colonialism the client state replaced
the colony and each would periodically
withhold arms from their rivals within
the Arab in Israeli conflict mostly when
someone took action that threatened
either British or French regional
interests and this branch of that
tripartite agreement even had a clause
that stressed that the three powers
would sell arms only with an assurance
that the purchasing nations could not
use them for acts of aggression against
other nations although what exactly they
were gonna use them for I'm not sure
meanwhile at least in the first few
years of the 1950s this chokehold on the
arms flow helped to keep the conflict
from erupting into full-scale war
that'll hold until the confluence of
Israeli security needs and European
colonial interests come together in the
Sinai War of 56 but the struggle between
is only Arab States is one of the most
malleable conflicts in history racial
religious territorial colonial
post-colonial Cold War you name it it's
basically a doppelganger it just takes
on whatever form is readily available
and I think I'm gonna push off the
conversation about full conversation at
least about infiltration till next
episode because it's gonna have the most
impact going forward in the 1950s but
for now let's just end with a word about
economic war the Arab League was formed
in 1944 and one of its foundational
purposes was to frustrate further Jewish
economic development in Palestine by
means of a boycott against Zionist
produce in resolution 16 only prohibited
the purchase of Zionist goods less this
lead to the realization of Zionist
political aims resolution 68 actually
said that propaganda should be carried
out to make the boycott of Zionist goods
a Creed of the Arab nations
so that each Arab might preach it
enthusiastically to all with the end of
the 1948 war and the signing of those
armistice agreements and
there's solidification x' through the
Cold War politics of the tripartite
agreements the chosen battlefield of the
Arab states became economic and a
central boycott office was established
in Damascus with branch offices in the
other Arab states economic warfare
officially replaced military
confrontation though like I said we'll
talk about border infiltration in an
episode to come now this wasn't simply
economic cold war where countries were
either on the Arab side or on the
Israeli side a blacklist was created for
individual companies that did business
in Israel and considering the size of
the Arab purchasing block versus the
Israeli one it meant that many
voluntarily complied with this blackmail
I remember growing up and we would come
to Israel you couldn't get Pepsi only
coke it wasn't until the Madrid peace
conference of 1992 that Pepsi entered
the market here because of the boycott
and beyond black listening the Arab
states surrounding Israel cut off all
land routes connecting the countries
including severing the pipeline between
Iraqi oil fields and the hyper refinery
import they'd been built by the British
furthermore during the interwar period
and world war ii Israel's economy had
begun to thrive driven largely by its
historic role as a hub transportation
and trade and travel between East and
West but in 1948 Israel became the only
non island nation in the entire world
that could be reached only by air sea
the Arab states closed their ports in
air field to Israeli carriers and third
party carriers transporting critical
goods like oil for Israel were kept out
as well the Straits of Tiran
which gave the new Israeli city of a lot
at its southern extremity access to the
Red Sea and therefore the whole world
was completely blockaded to Israeli
shivering until 1956 choking the new
port city and serving as a primary
trigger to the Wars of 56 and 67 the
surrounding Arab states even banned
holders of Israeli passport or visa
stamps from entering their nations
Israel seemed to be cut off now I know
from the perspective of today's start-up
nation whose economy rivals any ones in
the world certainly in the region we
might be attempted to see the boycott as
no big deal or even as a case of the
Arab nations coming up their nose to
spite their face I mean who really lost
out it's clearly been a failure either
way but nobody knew this in 1948 and
when you add the boycott to the picture
that I painted in the last two episodes
about the austerity measures and the
mass emigration you can imagine that the
economic outlook in Israel was downright
grim it really seemed to be as author
Barbara Tuchman called it the land of
unlimited impossibilities and we haven't
even touched on the most painful
challenge which at pace Israel in 1949
was a strategic nightmare as ben-gurion
said our border is the worst conceivable
extremely long and meandering a land
border lacking any natural defenses if
you look at the map or I should say the
armistice lines it was surrounded by
hostile states all of the major cities
were with an artillery range and not not
only that the country had a 10-mile
waistline between the Tonja and the West
Bank which meant that one successful
armored thrust could cut it in half but
that's not all there's a major issue
that we have to discuss and I want to
start the discussion now but I'll leave
it's deeper analysis for another episode
because the sudden increase in land area
which was emptied of its Arab
inhabitants in 1948 was followed by a
massive demobilization of the IDF forces
at the end of the war they had to do it
in order to try to save the staggering
economy and what that produce was large
parts of this new frontier completely
undefended not just undefended
unpopulated and that meant the
infiltration or he sustained a newt as
it's called in hebrew by the Arab
refugees began even before the war had
ended Israel was fighting to maintain
sovereignty over the lancet conquered
from day zero in essence in the eyes of
many generals and politicians the war of
independence never ended it just shifted
tactics from classic confrontation to
infiltration
now the Lebanese and Syrian borders up
in the North were relatively
straightforward and therefore easily
sealed and the border between the Negev
and the Sinai desert all the way down
itself was wide open but that was the
realm of the Bedouin they were crossing
back and forth for their own grazing and
raiding purposes but they were transient
and even sometimes to be relied upon
it was the borders with the Gaza Strip
in the West Bank then as now that were
completely porous and therefore the
source the problem between ten and
fifteen thousand infiltration incidents
occurred per year between 1949 in 1954
now some were simply refugees farmers
crossing over to work the land that
they'd abandoned to maintain their
family connections or just simply to
return to home after the trauma of war
others were thieves looking to steal
crops irrigation equipment farm animals
or anything else that wasn't nailed down
in the bordel settlements and in the
wake of a brutal war one might try to
stop them but you could hardly blame
them and of course smuggling is always a
major industry and then there were the
small but deadly percentage who came to
spy sabotage and kill and in the period
between 1948 and 1956
infiltration slowly but surely became
the defining issue in arab-israeli
relations even more than the economic
boycott that we discussed previously
more than 200 Israeli civilians and
scores more soldiers were killed by
these infiltrators these are painful
losses but not ones that threaten the
stability of the state I mean six
thousand had to hide in the independence
war but beyond the loss of life and the
economic damage it was the fear that
infiltration generated that almost
undermined the young state's efforts to
resettle the waves of Jewish refugees
pouring in that we discuss in previous
episodes now security officials and
policy makers agreed that the military
presence along the border was not enough
even if the state could have afforded to
maintain the forces only a settled
population could actually seal Israel's
borders it's what's known as no hoot
widespread presence and so a policy of
population dispersion began
we touched on this idea from a different
angle in the last episodes but not only
did this dispersion ease the crowding
from Israel's art a settled coastal
strip he aimed to establish new
settlements populated by these new
immigrants in order to prevent era
refugees from coming and returning to
their own homes and lands if in the
early days of the conquest of labor back
in the second a liao the model had been
where the plow stops the border begins
now the modern the sovereign state
became were infiltration stops the
border begins and settlement was seen to
be a far more effective tool than
military presence in putting an end to
it from 48 to 54 only six years 350 new
settlements were founded almost all of
them collective agricultural you know
Moshe Feiglin kibbutzim located on or
close to the borders the Zionist
leadership called it Jewish mama the
conquest of the wastelands the classic
Zionist phrase and they called it that
despite the fact that everyone knew much
of it was cultivated land whose Arab
inhabitants at I have been driven out or
simply fled during the war some spoke in
biblical terms of settling the refugees
of Europe and the Arab lands in houses
which they didn't build on fields which
they didn't plant but it was Ben Gurion
who has always expressed the pragmatic
goal the best he said in his
introduction to a book which was
praising the settlement of each region
that area now called the la Hache region
lies at the gate to the Negev the
immigration waves of the last century
could not penetrate this region and
after its conquest in the war of
independence he remained for several
years empty and abandoned because of the
severe security danger it split the
country for years and enabled bands of
smuggles and infiltrators to pass
through even in peacetime no one could
imagine ten years ago what is today
visible places that were scenes of
combat in the war of independence have
now become strongholds and outposts in
the south and if you have a sharp ear
you can surely hear how these factors
set the stage for the narrative conflict
to come
Zionists land theft first build in the
country for the sake of a secure life
and we're still in
argument now but constant infiltration
actually threatened to put an end to all
of these efforts the issue was more than
tactical it was cultural because many of
the new immigrants had no experience in
agriculture and certainly none in
settling a hostile frontier in fact from
48 to 50 fully 46% of the population
that had been dispersed in these new
settlements left some were completely
emptied of their inhabitants there were
efforts even put up guards to keep
people in as opposed to keep the
infiltrators out lady ash Cole who was
then head of the Jewish agencies
settlement department wrote to
ben-gurion in April 1950 sounding the
alarm about the security of these new
settlements he said we're putting up
dozens of new immigrant settlements
throughout the Jerusalem corridor on the
galleys borders and in other areas just
hundreds of meters from any lines these
immigrants as a natural salt of their
wanderings rootlessness and infirmities
are like autumn leaves that tremble even
in an imaginary wind time will have to
pass before they acclimatize and are
educated to be confident of themselves
and defenders of their settlements now
veterans of the second alia like
ben-gurion and ash Cole knew that life
on the frontier had the power to
transform that it could take these
frightened immigrants from being leaves
that tremble in the wind
too strong trunks rooted in their soil I
mean they themselves had experienced the
healing power of coming to land leave
note Willie Heba no to build and be
built the problem was they needed a
chance to strike rude the army who
stretched too thin to maintain the whole
border in force and we'll have to
discuss I think at this point in another
episode how they dealt with the problem
so the immediate solution seemed to be
to go back to that classic Zionist model
of having a plow in one hand and the
rifle in the other and for some just
receiving a weapon was enough of a life
changing experience this is this letter
one new immigrant wrote back to his
family and I've now received a rifle on
my land to protect my home I cleaned it
and hung it by my bed i lying gaze at my
rifle and I feel my confidence rise in
expanding inside me
like yeast dough filling my heart my
blood and all my bones from now on I
will not be afraid there is a way to
defend ourselves
it's a powerful expression of what for
many may seem strange those of us who
come from peaceful countries but to
someone who is a product of 2,000 years
of wandering and oppression it seemed to
be an instant solution but for others
there was a lot more required to undergo
the transformation into Israelis but as
opposed to the new settled immigrant
motion beam there were plenty of kibbutz
and moshav being that were populated by
old-timers or youth movement members
which were not abandoned during these
difficult years and because of this they
had the survival skills the experience
of hardship and an ideological clarity
that allowed them to overcome all
obstacles now encouraged by the state
many of the veterans left their homes
and moved into the immigrant border
settlements as youth leaders community
organizers are simply new members and
their impact in stiffening the result in
holding the border can't be
underestimated and beyond the specific
question of infiltration or even a
specific question of immigrant
settlement in many ways these portal
settlements became a crucible this is
where a new Israeli character was formed
one that could fight and win against all
odds because of the sense that we had
come home it's just like ben-gurion said
during a debate over a civil defense law
in the Knesset in 1951 it's not the army
that is decisive
what's decisive is the entire nation the
material and spiritual capacity that
beats within it it's not the rifle the
artillery and the airplane that battle
and win but the living person who uses
them and the capability of a man to face
gun fire in death his ability to fight
to win depends not only on his technical
abilities but rather on the spirit that
beats within him and so this is the
second source of national legitimacy we
talked a little bit about the
international context and will pursue it
down through season three I mean after
all the international community is still
trying
Forge peace in the Middle East but here
we see another element which is national
cohesion the way in which the adversity
economic military cultural that the
young state face actually caused a new
Jew in the sense of that Zionist dream
to emerge and one who was capable and
ready to fight the battles which lay in
the decades ahead and we're not gonna do
it now but I'll give you a teaser for
the next episode because if there was
one man who in the eyes of the nation
embodied that Israeli spirit that beats
within who shaped not only the national
policy toward infiltration but also was
able to fill the nation with courage in
the face of its threat it's going to be
Moshe Dayan
but his story lies ahead I just want to
thank a few people now that I'm done I
want to thank all the folks that give
their hard earned money help make this
show happy to keep it free and widely
available and I want to invite you to
join them go right now to my website
Jewish story dot Co in the upper right
hand corner you'll see a button that
says be a patron you can click on
through there for a little bit of per
podcast support I also wanna remind
folks that I'm happy to dedicate a show
to anyone living or dead just send me an
email and I'll shoot you back the
details that's Rob Mike foyer at
gmail.com or you can contact me at
Jewish story podcast and Facebook or Bob
Mike for on Facebook so I'm thanking
folks I also want to thank the Land of
Israel Network that's the Land of Israel
comm for creating a platform that allows
me to reach so many amazing people and I
want to put a little shout out coming up
on Shavuot are doing an amazing four-day
program at design hotel in Jerusalem be
there I'm gonna be speaking I think I'm
a last day it looks like I also want to
thank the partes Institute dar DES org
dot al for creating an educational
institute that allows me to teach so
many wonderful Jews and I want to thank
you for listening