Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Okay, good morning friends. We're
continuing in mission
is we're middle of
the in the beginning of said if you
washed one hand and you rubbed it on
your head or a wall and then you then
touched that water that was on your head
or on the wall it's t because the t
water is and is mame the hand that
touched the water mu explained we're
talking about you only
So even though the hand is tar, the
water is tame, then you contact it. So
your hands are tame
and bro explained we're talking about
where you only wash
um and you didn't use take a look in
then the water is
Okay,
now
back to the
sharim.
Even though before you rubbed your hands
together, rubbing your hands together is
of the hands.
Now that you went back and you touched
it, it's worse.
who pours at once
is not included in this.
There is no t water at all.
Now
what does the mean? What's
he bothered by? Says
Had you not gone and touched this water,
your hands would become completely
just by wiping it without
because you wiped it off.
In other words, Mish is bothered by like
this. Let's say you only pour on each
hand. So your hands are the water is t
and then you rub off that water. So what
is the status of your hands? The status
of your hands are now they're tahar. The
hands became tahar and you wiped off the
mayam.
But now that after you wiped it off, you
touched it again. The hands become tummy
again. So it's worse. Had you not
touched it, the hands would have become
through the process of less than a and
then of but now that you retouch that
water, your hands became tame again.
Okay, it's worse.
You need to dry them.
Here's a million-dollar question.
Why doesn't the mishaba tell us whether
you need to make a braha or not?
You wash again. Okay. No. What's and and
and and
do you make a braha? Do you not make a
braha?
>> Doesn't koi include the braha?
I would say maybe not.
You just follow the of washing.
But do you make a braha
second? I don't know.
>> Perhaps not. Otherwise, he would tell
you.
>> Yeah.
Yeah. Do we ever learn like what the
final mechanism is that would break the
last that would force us into a new bra?
I
>> mean we had ink measur
said
if you wash there's no problem
that you have to be careful that's once
you wash the ra be careful that no one
else touches it.
But if you already made
you wash again
um
I don't know I would say
>> in this case the washing is being
completely invalidated.
>> What
>> isn't that true? In this case the
washing is being completely invalidated.
>> It is true. So why wouldn't you make a
braha then you want washing?
>> So why doesn't the mission say to make a
braha
means to wash again
unless you're still in the middle of a
process if you're still you bro that's
what you're trying to do if you're
trying to tie your hands of bread in the
middle school.
I would I'm inclined to agree but I'm
not I'm troubled why the mission bro
didn't say you make a braha
>> that could be inherently what the is
saying in that that's one of the
underlying points of him bringing down
the was that this would be a indicator
to say a new
>> I agree but the only thing is everybody
has stopped short of saying that you
make another braha and we've had
situations where the mus said no you
don't make another braha
so
why
you would think this would be worthwhile
to point out you ask and you make a bra
you even make a braha okay I I and
logically I agree I don't see a reason
not to other than the fact that he
didn't say it okay I'm not
test.
When you pour the first words on your
hand,
be careful that there's no pebble, chip,
or something else.
The water will only be
water on a hand,
not water on a pebble. In other words,
the is
only
on your hand
but not not water on something else.
So this is not a sul of katita. This has
nothing to do with katita by the way.
This is not a den of katita. He's not
saying make sure there's nothing on your
hand because it'll be the problem is if
there's something on your hand then the
will not be the
we'll see you in the mission. starts
if you're not careful
and you see after a pebble or a chip
your hands are
and you have to wa you have to dry them
you have to wash one time the second
time
is definitely different than karoy
take the um the only thing is in the it
says
it's just like we said earlier you know
so that means he's saying it's the same
you know
Now,
what if after let's say you caught the
pebble after
or what if the wash away the pebble?
What if by rinsing with you rinse the
pebble or the rock?
It's a question.
Maybe it works.
They're not so sure. Now, I don't know
how many times the quotes
in the You could do a search. I don't
have that answer right now.
Again, we still haven't seen what the
problem is.
and in and uh we'll see tomorrow the
problem is not
in we'll read it quickly you have to
make sure there's nothing on your hand
even if it's loose and the water is to
come underneath
is nothing to do with the problem is
only
Let's quickly see the
what would the be if you didn't discover
it after you discovered it after
maybe it helps. Why would it help? So
says it's a mash from the that it helps
because said
um
the said he said
that implies if you would have caught it
before it would
because of
the language of you have to make sure
implies that it doesn't remain there but
that that's if you got it before
you would be okay
or maybe no if it remained there
immediately after
maybe the water on the pebble will be
the And
maybe doesn't mean after the
means even after
and then he says
as opposed to if the first pouring
washed it off then there's no problem.
So the sh is when say is it only a
problem that it doesn't remain after
or imply even if it remains there after
it says
beginning of is talking
So he's saying it's only a problem
>> clearly otherwise he wouldn't he would
just say
>> so that by the way that doesn't mean
only when you're
because certainly
>> that's culture but here it's
>> one second
again the shila of the is what if you
remove the afterm
And then you poured on it. Is that a
problem or not? So the the is busy with
the shine of
is only a problem after
or is it
even a problem after?
So you're saying the
isma it's even a problem.
So the says
that it says
that it doesn't work even if you removed
it afterwards.
So then the is bothered.
Right. The of the is
if you remove it after and then you pour
the
or if the washed off the chip,
how do I know that would also work? So
the says the truth is the tana disagrees
with me, but I wrote my opinion.
So the bottom line is if you find the
afterwards, you're for sure up the creek
without a paddle. The question is if you
removed it immediately after
would that uh be sufficient or is there
still
Okay, we'll hold over here.
>> Recording stopped.
