Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
The Inaugural Torch
2 views
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
The very end of the mission that we
learned on that test of a love. So the
mission of pivoted.
The mission began to meet the main and
the
mission and the mission etc. etc. And
then the mission said
which involves
which is the beginning of tomorrow's
but
all of this is
for the whole of the whole
of the whole of the whole of the whole
of the whole of the whole of
the whole of the whole of the whole of
the whole of
the whole of the whole of the whole of
the whole of
the whole of the whole of the whole of
the how
the had
had to be
the camera in the base of
another words you couldn't just go ahead
and start using a camera in the base of
it required a
right
come ask me
there's some
process that required
the camera to go through before the
camera were able to be used and the
mission that goes and delineates how
exactly they were
each one of the camera in the base of
truth is this is very much the topic of
tomorrow's but we're preempting a little
bit of this bridges today's
and tomorrow's
you know over the years we mentioned
many times that he Frank in his heart
wrote
a true related to the Hirsch Kalisher
movement in the 19th century about
bringing a carbon in
and his
his in
that he brought to the was this right
here says I don't understand how in the
world it's going to be possible to bring
a carbon
because in order to bring a carbon
you're going to have to have a bear
and in order to have a
you have to be
the
and the mission that says the only way
you can be the
only way you can be the is with the
the
was a carbon
which had to be paid for by the the
so basically
you're suggesting that we're going to
have
it's going to be impossible to have
and it's for that reason he said
he
said he said he said he said he said he
said he said he said he said
said that it's going to be impossible to
go ahead and bring the carbon
really the background to this is that
even
knew that it was only the carbon he was
able to bring but I'll come back and
bring the carbon
right because everything had issues but
the carbon he thought he could bring but
he said
that you can't bring only the carbon
because you have to first be
and the
is the
is something that has to be done
you did the and as a result he held the
whole movement was was dead on arrival
again this is a that we spoken about
several times over the years nothing I
just want to mention one
and that is
that
the
in the Yuma
discusses
the
summer night
and the says
and that is
love of you would thought for sure that
accounts as an
so we know love of
had the love of
in fact the says
I would
have to have a
there's four that if would do them you
would be high of so
what are they is
actor and the and
and the goes through every other in the
world and tries to figure out why would
do them he wouldn't be high of
and then the comes to the
and the says
it's not even
because it's
possible that if would do
he wouldn't be high of now the truth is
is
whether
means that the
is allowed to go ahead and do
or means
that the
if he did it he won't be high of like
the says holds he's allowed to do
the says
not allowed to do
right he tells the you're taking way too
much out of this
all the said was in response to why is
not high of for doing the
but to go be all
and to say that could do
that that that this is
has a and on it something we spoke about
in the past but the income of the is
if you take a look on the side of the in
the in the
says to him it's a player how could it
be that the says the love of
the of the of the
that the holds that the
of the of
is allowed to do the there's no in the
when it comes to the of the
this cash is most obvious cash in the
world
cash is the of right
who's supposed to do the of
the
is the one that's supposed to be the
of
so
that I don't understand how's it
possible how's it possible that the says
and she does is that
even allowed to
as long as
there's no
for a to do it well if that's the case
about
the
of it's a
it's a
how could anyone hold that there's no at
the very least it should even be but for
sure
for a
to be the
what happened to the
of
the
in a classic
right in the beginning of the
he says
a double
says
I would say
that when the
says
about
you know what the was referring to that
was not
that every single time
the
was going to be lit that it would have
to be lit by a
that says
I think it's talking about a that's
tucked away in a
in the in the that
the mission talks about how they were
the different in the base of
in
in this of of of
of
of of of
of of
of
of of of of of that the way the
of the took place it happened the
it happened
with the of
so
this
of
about
that's talking about the
of being
and in
of
so
that required a it's the
that would happen afterwards had love of
share the
of
I feel
about
this about
is talking about how they were the and
that was something that had to be done
and
I think
that I think that's the
in the that everybody knows that in the
beginning of
says that why did right here in about
immediately following
the of the tell
about
the
so the says
because was very sad because
the
because the
was
are you
who is
because he wasn't involved because he
wasn't involved in the
who not him who is not a
I'm like
so
told him you have nothing to worry about
yours is going to be bigger than theirs
automatically you made
you're going to be
the of this is a
he wasn't involved in the of and he
tells him you're going to light the of
but it's a what
his issue was that he wasn't involved in
the
so you're giving him a
you're telling him that he's going to be
the
of very very you can do what the says
that what he was referring to was the
that was going to happen the
but it's because the problem with this
obvious question stares you in the face
he has that
he wasn't engaged in the
so what's the over here that you're
going to be the of
the
was that
you're going to have a
of of that's going to have to be done
you did you and it won't be able to be
done
because
that's
and if that's the case just like the of
could be done
the of could also be done
but the
was
he told him you feel bad that you missed
out on the
I'm going to give you a of only is
allowed to be done you
this
mission in the
in the
that says
it's this is the of that was the that
got and that's the
was
why because he missed out on the
what was the
that you're going to be involved in the
that
the
of the
that
really happened
it's
but it's the
that's what this was that's that's
so the
that
I think you can say
in something that
if you think about it a little bit it's
something we've heard a thousand times
but
he's asking a very question and that is
what is
the conclusion of this of
the
of the of the
right this was the of the famous of
Cutler right we all know the right the
of the of the
how could the be made the of the of the
it's being
stated in real time right now
about the
what's the I don't know it sounds like
Aaron's going to have to Always light
the menorah. So if Aaron's going to
always have to light the menorah for the
next 39 years in the midbar, Aaron's
going to be lighting the menorah.
Stating that right this second in
Parshas Beha'aloscha,
you go ahead and you tell Aaron that
what? You tell Aaron that you should do
it. Aaron lights the menorah. If I ask
him Aaron
if the tzeevi was to light the menorah
always, then where's the
because right how we did it? Okay, let
me explain. 39 years from now we'll
revisit this and we'll figure out. Was
Aaron shina was he lo shina? How could
the Torah be made right now like
the lo shina? So Remes Simcha, it must
be it must be that really the
Beha'aloscha is was not that Aaron was
always going to be the one that was
going to light the menorah. But the
Beha'aloscha was was that he was going
to be the menorah. By asking Aaron like
he was the one that went and he lit the
menorah for the first time. He was the
menorah. The words of Remes Simcha. The
gain. By asking Aaron
should the lo shina
also be like
I will
allow you to
also
do it myself. The call of
this is
the this has to be the
Remes Simcha the answer to the
question is shina. He said that even
though
she
said that it's even as shina. But there
was a that had to be done by Aaron. And
that was Beha'aloscha
it was the
it's this that's tucked away here in the
Mishnah at the very end of Menachos daf
mem tes
I also saw a nice
there's a sefer it's called Parshas
Chodesh
on Menachos. Incidentally, if you're of
Remes Simcha's Torah and who isn't and
you're learning Menachos now it's good
idea to track down the sefer. But either
way right here in Menachos daf mem tes
so the
on this sefer he's different pieces from
Remes Simcha on Menachos. Then he wrote
a whole sefer on the bottom
divrei
every that I went through. But either
way so there's a little called
Torah.
And in the
Torah it claims a nice
it comes out that
Remes Simcha's
at the first time that the was lit the
of the that had to be done by he said
that of that first
is that the
because that is
meaning in as much as it
that's only every
after the first but the has to be done
by
so he said it's Torah. If it's not
if it's not
I but Aaron
the Torah says that told Aaron this is
going to be done by you day you and if
it's going to be done by you day you
this is going to be a
but just because there's a
doesn't mean that there has to be a
what's the
example of we need a
but it's not an example of it has to be
done by you day you but at the same time
it's not necessarily
he claims this is
that the first of the
of the first
this
was that
was together that it had a that was an
or it wasn't an
required but
on number one
if it's an
so obviously has to be
otherwise he's
if it's not an
he wouldn't need to be
another maybe it would be
because really the said that should be
when he's the menorah. What was the
but for Remes Simcha's
at the first is an
so maybe he would even say that
it would be I mean said
it would be very if that was the case
but
nice in terms of understanding the
of this Remes Simcha the bottom line is
this Remes Simcha
his
that there were two
there was one of
the
and then there was the
that initial of
the truth is this is really
in Parshas Tetzaveh I know but this is
really Torah in in Parshas Tetzaveh
because really the whole end of Parshas
Tetzaveh the Parshas of Miluim it talks
about different
that were done that seem to be part and
parcel of the Mishkan and this Torah
from we're going to get to the space
where the
said that those that are being discussed
in Parshas Tetzaveh it's not
but the of those
are it's the
and that's the safe of this Mishnah over
here in Menachos daf mem tes
either way we're going to stop here.