Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
The in explains that the ongoing
existence of the world that we see that
we observe all around us right now is a
greater miracle than the most iconic
miracle in the Bible which is according
to univer universal city studio tour
>> parting of the Red Sea. Yes, of course.
>> Parting of the Red Sea. Um the ongoing
existence of the phenomenological
universe is a greater miracle than the
iconic
kusamsu the splitting of the sea. How
so? So he explains very simply the
splitting of the sea. We know the
mechanics of that. The Torah tells us
that there was a strong east wind that
was blowing all night and the wind was
powerful enough to act upon the water
and to push the water and to cause the
water to stand like a wall.
In other words,
the mechanics of the splitting of the
sea was something from something. It was
a manipulation of the form of a
something into another something.
For instance, when and this is the
metaphor that the the the alterb himself
uses. When the silver smith takes a hunk
of silver and he melts it down and then
he makes a vessel out of it. What has he
done? He didn't create silver. He
manipulated the form. He changed the
shape of this chunk of silver into a
into a cup.
Now, here's the thing. When you change
the external form of something,
it tends to stay put. It tends not to
revert to its previous condition.
And the reason is because it's not a
major imposition to change the external
form of something.
You know, you could take this podium and
you could take it apart and collapse it
into pieces and it'll it's not going to
reassemble itself. It's not going to
strain to come back into this shape
because you just change the shape. It's
not a big deal. Or you could even burn
it and turn it into ashes. You can take
this whole podium and turn into a little
clump of ashes. This you're just
changing the form. It's not going to
revert. It's not going to reassemble.
Okay, you you're saying I know that.
What are you what are you trying to get
at? What are you explaining? Okay, so
let me tell you what this is in
contradistinction
to
when I say when you when you change the
form of something, it tends to just stay
changed
as opposed to what? As opposed to what?
As opposed to when you change the
essence of something.
When you change the essence of something
as opposed to the form which is an
external or superficial or secondary
quality, when you change the essence of
something, then
it doesn't tend to stay put. In fact, it
tends to strain to revert to its
essence. In fact, that's kind of the
definition of essence. Essence means
what the thing is.
So, for instance, and this is just a
metaphor. It's just a metaphor and it's
a crude metaphor um in the sense that
it's the best I could approximate here
in this very uh informal laboratory.
But let's say this pen, okay, this pen,
the shape of the pen is not essential to
the pen. And I mean I could prove that
pretty quickly just by disassembling the
pen, right? Okay. And it'll it'll stay
that way. Okay. But or I could melt it,
could turn it into like mush. But what's
essential to the pen? One thing that's
essential to the pen, at least according
to Newton, would be that it's inert.
Objects at rest tend to stay at rest.
Right now, I could override that
and I can impose
movement upon the pen,
right?
But it doesn't want to keep going. It
wants to revert to being inert to not
moving
because essentially it's not moving. It
doesn't move on its own. It can be moved
but it itself doesn't move.
And that's sort of again it's just a
metaphor but that's sort of like an
example of what happens when you try to
override the essence of something. So
it doesn't want to stay put. It wants to
go back to what it really is.
So you think about it like this. Every
something was once nothing. However long
ago in your narrative that was, but
every something was once nothing. It
wasn't always here. Existence wasn't
always here.
Okay. So it was nothing.
I don't know a lot about nothing.
But I'll tell you one thing I do know
about nothing.
Nothing doesn't exist.
And therefore
to make nothing exist
you following
what I mean is to force nothingness into
a state of somethingness is not a minor
change. It is not a change to a
secondary or superficial characteristic
of the nothingness. To force nothingness
into a state of somethingness is to
override its very essence.
And as such, nothingness is never
comfortable in a state of somethingness
and is always automatically straining. I
don't want to personify this, but
forgive the the anthropomorphism, but
it's it's straining to go back to its
true self, which is non-existence.
And that's why creation per se is
ongoing. It's not something that
happened. It's happening. And as the
Cabala teaches us, if the Holy One,
blessed be he, were to stop speaking the
world into being, that's how he creates.
He creates through divine speech. If you
were to stop speaking the world into
being,
the world would disappear without a
trace.
It would be gone.
It would leave no
it would leave no empty space behind
because even that is is a is among the
trappings of existence.
In fact, not only it would no longer be
here, it would never have been here in
the first place because it would lose
everything including its history.
That is how totally
dependent
created existence is upon the creator
imposing it into its state of
creation.
Therefore,
tells us that really only God exists
because
the world although it exists
it doesn't really have its own existence
not in the absolute sense
it is completely dependent
upon
Hashem's existence imposing it into a
state of existence
at at every single moment.
Which means not only is it totally
dependent, meaning it depends on being
forced into existence, it depends on
being forced into existence for
everything about it. So that's total
qualitatively speaking, but also
quantitatively it's always it's
constantly dependent
completely and constantly.
You follow what I'm saying?
qualitatively and quantitatively
everything that exists depends on being
forced into existence and it depends on
that for it's everything and it depends
upon that all the time there's no lag
time if if if God stops speaking the
world into being there's no there's no
lag time it's not like
if you you pull the batteries out of a
out of a toy how long will it keep
moving before uh before it stops moving
after you you know after you cut the
power there's no lag time
because every single second I a second
is too big but I don't know what time
unit of time to use
every created being is dependent upon
being forced into creation
so if that's the case
then really
everything at this moment
is being created
exactly as the creator in his infinite
wisdom has decided to create it
and if so it follows
how can I be distressed
you know what I took a long time to
learn in life just because things are
not in my control doesn't mean that
things are out of Control.