Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
The Day that the Spirit of the Beis HaMikdash Died
1 views
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Going back to the beginning of the
Sugya,
the
part of the Sugya that discusses Uva Uva
Peritzin that we've
talked about many times over the years
of the
below
Mishnah.
And that is as follows.
The Gemara in
Daf 71, this is still
105 says I'm
a Molly
Had I been a wife in the generation
that instituted the Tainus of Tisha B'Av
like
a Siri I would have not been
the fast on the 9th day of Av, but
rather I would have been the fast on the
10th day of Av.
Because the majority of the
was burnt on the 10th day of Av, not on
the 9th day of Av.
And as a result, that would have been my
vote. I wasn't there, they didn't ask
me. And of course, the fast goes down in
history as being the Tisha B'Av and not
a Siri B'Av. But said Rebbe
What's the Rabbanan's response to that?
At
the end of the day, we don't go based
away the time that the majority of the
was the majority of the was destroyed.
We go based on the
and being that the happened on Tisha
B'Av it's for that reason this fast goes
down as being on Tisha B'Av.
The
Sofer in many places in
Tshuvis
Orach Chaim
Siman 34 and in Tshuvis Yoreh De'ah
Siman Resh Lamed Gimmel
and in Tshuvis Yoreh De'ah Siman Resh
Samech Daled U'va'ois Makomous
says a beer flo in this Gemara that the
decided to impose the Tainus on the day
that the started, not on the day that
the
of the
took place.
It's based on the Gemara in Daf
Nun Beis Amud Beis where the Gemara says
that there's an idea of
Peritzin V'Chilulu that when the
Peritzin entered the
they were the
and they turned the
into Chulin. Says the Sofer, it's true
that
the
took place when? On Yud B'Av. But when
did it start? The
of the was on Tes B'Av.
>> [laughter]
>> The
of the
Tes B'Av doesn't just mean oh that's
when it began. If that's when it began,
that's when the
Peritzin V'Chilulu took place. And if
that's when the Peritzin V'Chilulu took
place, that's when it became Chulin.
That means the
became Chulin. The of the
happened on Yud B'Av. But said the
that was Avodah Zarah. It was a bias
that at that point had already been
Chulin. Because the
didn't
of the
that departed as soon as
Peritzin was happened already on Tes
B'Av. And that's the of the Gemara. That
the Rabbanan held
because
that was the
Peritzin. And at that point it was
already Chulin. And if at that point it
was Chulin so that of course is what it
is we're mourning. That's why the Tainus
is on Tes B'Av and the Tainus is on the
is not on Yud B'Av. But I was thinking
this Sofer
is so compelling when he is dating that
I think we need to now pose the question
on Rebbe Nachman.
Rebbe
Nachman, why did you feel that it was
more appropriate
to make the Tainus on Yud B'Av, not on
Tes B'Av? The of the
that's Avodah Zarah. Aren't we concerned
about the
spiritual the spiritual dimension of the
not the physical? And if that went away,
if that departed 100% not 100%
on Tes B'Av then the Rabbanan are right.
Meaning I think this Sofer is such fire
that we need to be
a little bit of Nachman. So I looked
around a little bit and I found a
in the floor Amish. And this is in the
Torah from my going to
Nachman. It's an often Nachman. It's in
Tainus in Perek Aleph. But I think in
order to appreciate it because the
Nachman is written so short we need a
little bit of an introduction. And that
is
we learned the Gemara together, spent a
considerable amount of time
of Uva Peritzin V'Chilulu. This idea
that's thrown around a lot. As shared in
the
today's Daf
or really the end of yesterday's Daf
here in
Daf Nun Beis Amud Beis.
The
on this Gemara asks a bomber on the
Gemara. So let's just over the Gemara.
It began with a question that Rebbe
asked Rebbe. that were used in
the matter of my
was not a of Avodah Zarah. Are you
allowed to use those in the
and not allowed to use those in the
Meaning if you didn't if is not a
for sure you'd be allowed to use those
in the What's What's the question? The
question is did make a not to use them
or not?
>> [snorts]
>> So Rebbe said I have a Raya. First he
had forgotten the Raya, but then he was
reminded of it. Said I have a Raya. I
have a Raya from a Parsha in Nach.
Divrei Hayamim Beis Perek Tes Pasuk Yud
Tes. The context over there is Achaz who
was the father of who was a terrible
Rasha. And he had the defiled the
by using
for Avodah Zarah. After Achaz dies,
comes and he wants to clean up the
He He takes those and and what does he
do with them? He hides them. Said Rebbe,
why did he hide those Oh because they
were used for Avodah Zarah. No. They
don't become that were used for Avodah
Zarah, they were Kodesh. So there's no
way Achaz has the ability to defile
those Kodesh. Why did he hide them? Must
be because there's a sensitivity that if
it was used for something that is
reminiscent of Avodah Zarah, we're not
going to use it for Avodah Well, if
that's the truth of for those says
Rebbe, I think I didn't that should be
the case as it relates to the that were
used in I feel
that Avodah Zarah. Right, that was
Rebbe's response. Good. Then the said
I think we have a Raya to Rebbe from
another episode in Jewish history. And
that is the Chanukah story. And we know
the came into the
and they defiled the
And one of the things they did was is
they brought abominations. They brought
Avodah Zarah on the And
when
took control again of the
he said what are we going to do with the
We can't go ahead and bring
on it. That's off limits. Maybe we
should break it. Can't do that. Maybe we
should break it and clean it. We can't
do that. Maybe we should use it. We
can't do that. So what did they decide?
One of the
would house it. It was put in the
That's what they did with the Says the I
understand. What was the problem with
using it? Shouldn't have been a problem.
In other words,
so when the defiled it, they didn't make
it Avodah Zarah. So what's the issue? Oh
it's a
So
you see again another
to Rebbe. Rebbe brought a Raya from
Divrei Hayamim Beis Perek Achaz and
Says the I mean to say we could have a
Raya from here as well. But the was
The said no, that when the went and did
their thing to the they actually defiled
the
And the And the reason they were able to
defile the is because the Pasuk says Uva
Peritzin V'Chilulu. And being that they
defiled it, they made it They made it
was If it was
they were
right.
And if they were
now they have a right to make it
So it's real
Avodah Zarah.
As a result, this is something that's
going to be off limits. It's for that
reason there's nothing they could do
about it. Let the Let the Gemara address
that. But the bottom line is it's for
that reason it's going to be off limits.
Wait, the
the obvious question that really all of
us should have asked. And that is I
don't understand. To the extent that
there's something called Uva V'Chilulu.
And that's why there's no Raya to our
Sugya from the stones of the
that were defiled by the
Then how did Rebbe bring a Raya from
Achaz and
What
was his Raya? When Achaz went and he was
Avodah Zarah with his whole
Really
didn't make it Why didn't he make it
because it belongs to So
why are we hiding it? Oh must be there's
a sensitivity. What do you mean? Of
course he made it
Uva Peritzin V'Chilulu which made it
And to the extent that it made it
So now it's
and that's why you have to hide it.
There's no Raya to Rebbe from the
But there's a Raya to Rebbe In fact,
Rebbe himself is bringing a Raya to his
from Achaz and
This is the
famous
So the you have to say
that this is this
This idea of Uva Peritzin V'Chilulu is
an incredibly novel idea. The Peritzin
entered the
have become What does this even mean? So
says the It's possible to me that the
reason this works is with the Parsha of
So we know there's a Parsha of in the
Torah. You're not allowed to benefit
from If you do benefit from what
happens? The is Chulin. So says the
This idea of Uva Peritzin V'Chilulu it
works with the laws of Meaning you want
to understand a little bit better, learn
That's how this works. If that's the
case, it's
Says the The
Mishnah says in There's no
There's no
by
of the
Kodesh.
In other words, you're not allowed to be
after you already
in the
because
by the
Kodesh don't make the
go to Chulin. The
not really our Sugya because there's
only by
there's no by Kodesh.
And the of the are Kodesh and as a
result there's no
So he says half of a fellow.
>> [snorts]
>> Achaz and they were handling the killing
of the base hamikdash. The killing of
the base hamikdash in my life a mile
there's no me or above our principle
works with the
being that there's no me or such a
reason you had a business is not going
to work over the
is Kelly the
was
and that's why the is over there there
was a deal of
that's the terror to the
says the you can have to say one more
cuz it's
that only a year could be my one a guy
can't be my one this must be if that's
the case over
the killer law
is talking about the that were
it's not the
I mean
says the
because it's working with the
and only a year is able to be
so
in his
a sham he says the
what the
is saying mom is has no to me
he says why number one you're making
this distinction between killer and the
killer
man are not subject to me or that's why
there's no me or over the
is not a killer the is not a killer
ain't killer
the
killer
in the base was the
of course it's a killer and if there's
no over the killer
because there's no me or by killer then
they couldn't be over the killer by the
you see in the of course there was over
the killer by the
that's number one killer number two the
says
there's no me or on killer the killer
is
given
he said not just that it's clear that
over
the killer
the killer the killer of over the killer
is referring to the base what does it
mean over
where's the
the base killer the killer
what the base
the killer says the
is the base
base is definitely killer and the killer
yet you see there's over the killer if
it's working with the
so how could it work so says the it's
possible that over the killer
has nothing to do with me or what is it
it's a new killer
there's a new killer that's called over
the killer
that when the killer and says the man
after the killer
when those killer enter the base killer
they have an ability to be
I if that's the case then how come by
the
there was no over the killer
so
who was
office was a year he wasn't
there you had and that was being over
that has nothing to do with over the
killer
over the killer when the enemy attacks
when they come in over the killer the
killer say not I mean over the killer
the killer
they have the ability of the killer but
a year which was the
with the killer over there there's no
over the killer
I'll go upon him there's a lot going on
here in this between the
and the
number one what's the difference between
and
and between the
according to the
office of the killer
killer
killer there's no me or by killer the
there's me or by killer according to
office of the killer
were
as opposed to the story of the the
were not
they were over the killer man another
thing that's going on over here is
whether the over the killer is
by man
that's what the says cuz if it works
with the me or it has to be over by
or over by that's the killer
that's what the says but more
fundamentally the takeaway is we have
over the
in the
what's possible over the killer
according to
the man it's working with the me or
according to the
it's a killer called over the killer law
if you miss pointing in this for one
second
there's an incredible Indian going on
here the said that the of
over the killer
is referring to the base itself the
killer referring to the
end of the base
the killer law and they defiled it they
rendered it literally
right that's possible what's going on in
in this
we know
that there's a big killer arguably the
biggest
of all time right in the conversation
the killer the killer the killer law
this is
the the killer
different and talk about it in different
places
the killer law what happened to over the
killer
the was just
that the killer
in this in the
of over the killer
is referring to
the killer
for sure the killer became well if the
killer became
this should resolve the question the
killer the killer the killer law what
are you talking about the killer the
killer the killer law over the killer
it's game over this should be common
Islam it should be finished right but
how is it over cuz it's possible
over like this the says
there's a
a
himself and this is Marcus you test that
addresses this and that is
we've spoken over the years so many
times about the
killer over
the past over the killer the killer the
killer law but as it relates to
Jerusalem and the base killer the killer
the killer the killer law meaning
according to the
and over the killer and over the killer
but if you go over the killer killer
that should
over the killer the killer the killer as
it relates to the
but as it relates to the base
killer the killer the killer law
the rabbit is massive over the
and the rabbit sheet is just the
opposite the rabbit holds the killer the
killer the killer law
lots of love I over the killer the
killer this is already a new is killer
the killer the killer law but only as it
relates to over the
as it relates to the and the base
it's like the killer
in other words according to the rabbit
today
is over the
killer the killer
over the
killer over the killer but today
according to somebody goes over the
right the rabbit famous is not going to
be doesn't mean it's
over the killer but the bottom line is
the rabbit sheet is the exact opposite
of the now over the years we've spoken
out the over the so many times cuz this
is over
what's over the there's no over the but
there is over the
over the
cuz over the was
over the killer
that as soon as the land was taken away
from us so we don't have it anymore but
over the and the base is
and the
never departed from the so that so that
remain but what's the rabbit the rabbit
holds just the opposite it's
the rabbit sheet is that over the is
over the law over the over the
law so the is the rabbit sheet is rooted
in the
one of those is Marcus you test take a
look at the in Marcus you test the
himself asks this
and the says one line ready it's one
line in the
the man
over the over the
killer law over the over the over the
killer
over the killer law
says the you want to know
in that sheet of
this is the that he may not worry about
over the
retain its killer where did it go if you
hold over the then go anywhere but
there's nothing to say that even if it's
retained but the base is gone you know
why because of this
managed because over
the killer law then cause that over the
should go away this is a
managed the is if you take another look
at that
that we've quoted so many times in your
over the
right before the over the says his word
of test
right we may also
right before he says
this the first line for
over the
maybe the rabbit's going to argue means
that rabbit holds over the
yeah but over the no over
over the killer the killer
the killer
over the killer the killer the killer
over the the killer the killer
the killer the killer I see here in the
the edition of the they bring that I'm
going to observe over the
of Pittsburgh fame the great Sinai said
on his on his over the I over the Marcus
the killer the killer the killer over
the the killer the killer the killer but
I'll go upon him it's really an over man
so what emerges over here is an
unbelievable that and that is that if
you hold like the over the in the
that over the killer is not me or
but there's a special over the
that when the
over the
end of the base it defiles the base
and it's true for the killer the base it
was true for the killer and over the
over the over the true for the base
itself cuz that's [laughter] what the
says over
over the killer the killer
says over the
are you ready this was all the
introduction says over
the over the
over the
I want to say over the over talking says
I'm going to tell you over the over
because it emerges if you hold over the
killer law you have to hold that as it
relates to over the
it's going to be like the killer
that's how the math works out cuz you
said what's the over the over the killer
the the over the over the killer is how
could it be over the killer over the
over the says the man we should tossed
obviously the Ramban literally tossed my
stuff your desk that's beside and that
that emerges from the singers that
are
is kitchen loss of love I not just a
mixed up the exact opposite of the sheet
of Rambam sheet that we understand
what's in this sheet right that mixed up
it's still beer about Shana still here
but how can it be here the
terrorists priests of the law and this
is
also
I eat that I write
maybe this is what the rabbis get title
Baba priests of the law right it has to
be if you hold up the Ramban's
priests of the law then what emerges
what emerges is there's no kosher with
my nose out soaked ready soaked
the more says in
normal days I'm
if somebody today would bring a carbon
outside of the doors are you
for holding a lot
of cookies
Rabbi said I have but Schlock he said
papa Rabbi said hi cuz
we showed kitchen of the kitchen loss of
love and what's the criteria to be
higher for
it has to be something that you could
have brought into the mixed up but it
says
so if you could have brought it into the
and you did it and you did it by you're
going to be high Rabbi said she does
your high but Schlock he says your papa
what do you see from
there Rabbi said she does your high
but not only regarding
regarding I mixed up as well because to
be high for being my love is my nose out
it's not enough that you hold that I
chose high for my stress you have to
hold my love of bias that is Rabbi
said she does exclusion I mixed up as my
nose out if this I mixed up as my nose
out what does that mean that means that
there's no for the law so for my simply
have to be my nose out to talk this way
Rabbi
obviously doesn't hold of
priests of the law cuz in the world of
the Ramban if you hold of priests of the
law there can't be I mixed up as my nose
out and if Rabbi
holds kitchen loss of love I for the
mixed up I'm my love is my nose out high
if that means Rabbi said she does that
there's no over priests of the law says
Rabbi
that's where Rabbi said I'm my love is
my nose out
like
a lot of Siri with Rubble by Mr.
What did the time know as how to the
what's the
what's the in the time of the
it's because priests of the law this
minute they came in they defiled it what
did we say is the
so what's Rabbi hold
Rabbi holds they didn't defile it Rabbi
said she does Rabbi
he doesn't hold of priests of the law
that's Rabbi
you want to hear just the shiny as I was
shown Rabbi this is the way he says it
but that's Rabbi said I buy this by Siri
we shouldn't be honest
the sort of days of the days I'll clean
sure is ball priests of the law the king
given she missed her bias lift got to
show us I the soul higher in this rough
by the show with my mission of the so it
comes out what was burning the show
mission of the ball priests of the law
so what's Rabbi said I love you so I
could advise
after
okay Rabbi meaning the Ramban the matter
of this matter is high if this walking
in came in this Siri the diet this is
all amazing this is what it means
portion is what it means he means the
Ramban and he means this whole
either way this is what we call a
classic
or a classic or a
mixed up or a mixed up