0:00 / 0:00
Terumah: Rebbe Nachman, Esther and the Power of Choice
16 views
By: Rabbi Shmuel Silber Download the FREE All Parsha app: https://linktr.ee/alltorah Follow us on social media: https://linktr.ee/alltorah Join the All Torah Clips WhatsApp Community: https://chat.whatsapp.com/LhFsTY2R6Ll40SFdFmh8i6 Donate: https://alltorah.org/donate
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Dear friends, welcome to this week's
virtual Dasha. This week we have the
incredible privilege of Paras Truma. And
with it, we begin the incredible journey
into the Mishka. A journey that will
span the parish of Truma and Sav and
then Vayak Pak where the Torah spares no
detail, the fabrication of the Mishka,
the structure itself, the creation of
the utensils, the khanic vestments, the
big day kuna. But I want to draw your
attention to the opening phrase or the
second P of this week's parish. Hashem
says to Moshabenu, remember you can't
build the Mishkan without a fundraiser.
So we have to do the fundraiser.
This is chapter 2025 verse two. Hashem
says to Moshe, "Speak to the Jewish
people,
take a take a gift offering, take right,
take charity, take the contribution from
every person whose heart impels him to
give. Take shall you take shall you take
the offering from them." As many of them
are intrigued by this,
Moshe, go around and collect collect.
It's a fundraiser. You got to collect
the money from why do you have to say
take for me? So says
that was telling Moshe is something
amazing. I don't just want the people to
give without specific intent. I want
them to give lushma. I want them to give
because that act of connection, that act
of giving brings them closer to me. That
act of giving is a fulfillment of of of
adherence to the divine will. That act
of giving is something so much higher. I
don't want them to give because of peer
pressure, social pressure, mosh knocking
on their door. I want them to give with
a complete heart. I want them to give
because they want to give. I want them
to give because they feel that that act
of giving to the mish is in and of
itself a form of divine service. And
that's why he says when you take it from
them, when you collect it from them, it
has to be has to be from it has to be
asks a very interesting question. And he
says, "I don't understand why does the
act of have to be thema." So in other
words, remember it would appear that
Hashem is kind of creating a paradigm
here for how we give that apparently
when it comes to it's not enough to
give, but you have to give with the
right intent. You have to give with the
right. You have to give to make sure
that you understand that it's a service
of that it's not it's not a burden to
give. It's a privilege to give. It's not
it's not it's not a it's not annoying to
be asked but it's the greatest privilege
to be asked because if you could support
if you could help that's wants us to do
it with the right intentions is a divine
act of service why why in fact the posit
says I think actually is probably the
one mitzvah that does not require any on
the part of the giver why not and listen
to the words of the he says
Because the act of giving stuck is
meaningful even if you don't have intent
for the service of God. Why not?
Because whether you give with intent or
not with or not for a higher purpose or
not at the end of the day you're doing
something good. Right? The the Reb
illustrates this with an act of giving
to a poor person. If I give money to a
poor person, so whether again I have all
the most beautiful cavanas in the world
or have absolutely no cavanas, right?
Whe whether I have intentions, no
intentions, whether I do it because I
want to do it or because I'm forced to
do it, they're compelled to do it or
social pressure to do it. Who cares? At
the end of the day, your act did
something positive. There was a poor
person. Now the poor person has money.
And by the way, it's not just with a
poor person. You can extend logic into
everything. When you give sudaka, by
definition, you have affected change
with your generosity. So right whether
you're helping the you're helping a
yeshiva you're helping a shul you're
helping an organization what whatever it
is that you're doing whether you have
kavana specific intent higher intent
holy intent or not the act in and of
itself by definition is constructive
helpful and meaningful so the goes on he
says something amazing he says therefore
I think the is coming to teach us
something different so see understand
that every p in the Torah has its stated
meaning and then of is epinemius there's
a deeper meaning
is teaching us an additional lesson by
the listen to this he says
take it for me take take it right I want
I want you to take it for my sake the
posit is not talking to the giver rather
it's talking to the recipient see the
giver doesn't need cavana whether he has
kavana doesn't have kavana his act
stands alone as a profound act of
generosity that is going to affect good
in this world. But who does need kavana?
The recipient needs kavana. The
recipient. The person who receives
requires
for the sake of hashem. What does that
mean? And the reb says very
interestingly theb says that ultimately
again
that if a person accepts
a person should never accept for the
sake of funding a luxurious lifestyle.
Other words, the Reba goes on and says
you're allowed to take stuck and you
have to take stuck if you don't have
what you need in order to meet your
needs, your basic needs in life. But if
you're taking stuck because you want
luxuries, you're taking stuck because
you want excess, that you're not allowed
to do. And the Reb that's
if you're going to take if you're going
to take then it has to be it has to be
for the right purposes. So amazingly
enough as much as everyone understands
the holy is talking about the giver
says no there's no of lashma there's no
obligation of specific holy intent by
the giver because even if the giver
doesn't give with intent his act is
still cathartic his act is still holy
his act his act still affects change but
who does have to have kavana who does
have to have specific intent the
recipient the if you're going to take if
you're going to take it's got to be lee
It's got to be thema. It's got to be for
sake of a mitzvah. Has to be because you
actually need it. And not because I'm
trying to go ahead and indulge some
additional appetite for excess. If you
need it, absolutely unequivocally take
it. And it's a mitzvah to do so. But if
you're not, if you don't need it, you
can't take it. It's got to be the act of
taking has to be a beautiful idea. But
perhaps we could also understand the
words of a little bit differently.
You know, I want to want to draw your
attention for a moment to migilster.
And there's because it's already so we
have to begin to get ready for the
there's an incredible episode. After
Mori sends word to Esther about the
decree of Hammon and Esther hears what
is about to happen to her people and her
maid servants come in. They tell her
everything that's happening and the
migill says as follows.
Esther was like shaking to her core.
And what did she do? She sent a change
of clothing to Morai. But Morai wouldn't
accept it, right? Because remember again
beforehand Morai heard already before
what Hmon was going to do and Morai
dawned sackcloth. He was sitting
sackcloth. He tore his clothing. He was
mourning. He was crying. He was dabbing.
So Esther hears the news. She's shaking
to her core. And the first thing she
does is send a change of clothing to
Morai that he should change out of his
sackloth. And the great dumps asks a
very simple question. He says, "I don't
understand.
Why did Esther send the change of
clothing to Morai? We understand why
Morai was wearing sackloth. Sackloth is
is symbolic of mourning. I understand
was he was broken. He just heard about
the decree to annihilate his people. So
Esther like what why exactly are you
sending him a change of clothing and
listen to the words of the Reb writes
he says because Esther
is ultimately when Esther hears that
Mori is crying and screaming for the
plight for the impending destruction of
what happens she sent him clothing
telling him you got to take off your
sackcloth perish
You can't be sad. You can't be sad. The
sackloth represents profound
personalistic sadness. You got to remove
your sackloth rather. Why?
because at the end of the day there is
only one way to deal with challenge and
that is
why because says
an incredible play on words you can't
come before the king in sackloth the
king representing if you want to affect
change with that the way to do it is not
with sacloth the way to do it is with
beautiful proper clothing.
Now, dear friends, sim doesn't
necessarily mean a big smile on your
face and clicking your heels. Sim means
a sense of hope, a sense of optimism.
That Esther was saying to Mori, when a
Yid faces crisis, we do not crumble.
When a Jew faces overwhelming
circumstances, I don't curl up in the
fetal position and rock back and forth
in the corner. That's not what we do. We
don't put on the sackcloth and pretend
or not pretend or make it look like the
sky is falling even if it feels like the
sky is falling. The understands that the
way to go ahead and deal with any crisis
in life is
not
that's yes that's true also but with a
sense of optimism a sense of hope a
sense of belief I got this we got this
no matter what it is we will figure it
out I what's the plan I don't know what
the plan is how you going to resolve it
I have absolutely no idea but here's
what I do know that if I take the
sackcloth approach and I just I'm all
broken all mournful, all sorrowful, all
dark, all depressed,
nothing gets done. Sir Esther, amazingly
enough, after she is shaken to her core
about the impending destruction of her
people, gathers herself together, sends
Morai a change of life, said, "Mori, get
it together." We're not sackcloth Jews.
That's not what we do. That's not how we
deal with it. Put on beautiful clothing.
Come before the king. Gird yourself with
a sense of hopeful optimistic sim and
let's go incredible and overwhelming and
perhaps that's what Rabbi Aman is saying
over here as well. What does it mean
that the poor person has to accept?
So the Reb says what it means is only
take what you need. If you're taking,
you can't take for excess, but perhaps
taking stock of the Schma means
something else. If anyone's ever been on
the side of of the recipient, it's a
very unpleasant place to be. And it's
not just with money. Not just the money.
You know, anytime you're in a difficult
situation and you need other people to
help you. For most of us, that is a very
uncomfortable feeling because if I need
someone else, that generally means that
I'm deficient in some way. There's
something that's lacking from me.
Whether it's actual money or whether
it's other emotional or intellectual
resources that I don't have, I need
someone else. And that feeling of
needing someone else and not feeling
whole could often be incredibly
difficult. Perhaps could also be
teaching us is
when you have to receive from someone
else. When you need help because you
just don't have it together. when you
need help because things are just not
going the way that you need them to go.
The if you're going to take Lee, let it
be the Schma. And perhaps the Schma
means for the sake of Hashem means with
an incredible and overwhelming sense of
optimism and of hope. If you find
yourself in a ka, if you find yourself
in a situation in life where you can't
right now solve your problems, some
circumstances that you're encountering
are just so incredibly overwhelming.
And I don't even know what to do and I'm
going to need help. Whether it's
financial, emotional, whatever it might
be, it is so easy in those moments to
put on your sackloth to just cry, to
just mourn, to just say wo is says, "No,
Moshe is the tell that when they are in
a mat of of need, when they are in a mat
of a situation of difficulty, remind
them, leave, put on your clothing, get
rid of the sackcloth, reject the
sackloth, Gird yourself, clothe yourself
with intention for with beautiful holy
intentions, with a sense of optimism and
hope. When you encounter crisis, there's
only one way forward and that is the
path of hope. That is the path of
optimism. I don't mean false hope and
false optimism because that could be
delusional, but a real feeling that
somehow
things are going to come together. How?
I don't know. I'm not exactly sure how,
but I believe it. I have to believe it
because if I don't believe it, the other
only other alternative is to put on my
sackloth and to literally again just
fall into a pile of depression,
sadness, and despair.
So those are the options. Life comes
down to one of two wardrobe choices. You
can wear sackloth or you can wear
clothing. That's what Esther Mak told
Mori it's what she whispers in our ear
as well.
There are times in life when we're
really in need. There are times in life
that are really overwhelmingly
difficult. There are times in life that
are incredibly challenging. How do you
approach those circumstances? Lee lmi
with that with holy intention with
kavana. But what kind of kavana? The
kavana of optimism. The kavana of hope.
the kavana that says, "I got this. Some
way, somehow, I'm going to power
through. Some way, somehow, I'm going to
make it to the other end of this
difficulty, of these trials and
tribulations. Some way, somehow, I'll
get to a place of sin again." Morai took
Esther's advice, took off his sackloth
ultimately later on, not immediately.
Not immediately, right? In the beginning
is a low key bell. He wouldn't accept
it. But later on he accepts the
clothing. May we have the courage in
those difficult circumstances to reject
the sackloth. Put on the beautiful
garments of hope and optimism and find a
way through even the most acute of life
challenges. Wishing everyone a good nar
of Shabas and a beautiful Shabas kesh.