0:00 / 0:00
Tanya Kuntres Acharon 6a- Hairstyles, Detail of Torah makes the world thrive- Rabbi Chaim Dalfin
33 views
Categories:
Torah
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
So we're at contra last section of Tanya
essay 6 using lessons in Tanya 365.
Let's read here for the note. The last
two essays explained how the observance
of the commandments of the mitzvah seek
out
the ex seeks out the exiled sparks the
hidden in this world and thereby
suffices it with godliness. That's
what's accomplished through doing
mitzvah.
They also pointed out that the same is
true of the study of their laws. The
present essay which is essay 6 in
goes one step further and explains that
the laws of the transcend the world
beyond any possible comparison. the laws
of the Tyra
and it's it uses the following when
David Amelik when triumphantly brought
back the araides the ark from its
captivity in the hands of the
Philistines theim
it was placed on a wagon
David had momentarily forgotten the
stipulation of the quote on the shoulder
shall they carry it.
So commenting on this episode, our sages
say that David's forgetfulness came as a
punishment
for his having referred to the laws of
the Tyra
as songs
only songs.
your statue quote. This is from Kufutes.
Each verse there, each letter has eight
verses. So for the letter Z, there's a
verse that says,
"Your statutes were songs for me in my
place of terror."
So I ask, why should the expression be
regarded as an offense?
Why should David Melik's calling me
songs be considered an offense? Because
that's what that's what he says. And in
what way is it related to its
punishment?
What's the connection?
These are among the questions discussed
in this essay before us and at a greater
length and etc etc. So let's go into the
text.
David,
it's a question. When you read this
verse is and everyone else supposed to
read it really with a question. David,
do it. Exclamation mark. Do it. David,
you call them songs. That's all that you
see in the Tyra is songs.
Because he had referred to the laws of
the Ty as songs. David hat was punished
by being made to stumble in a matter
that even school children knew. No. And
that is that the artes
is to be carried on the shoulders. That
was his punishment. Next page.
So behold in the
says like this.
the praise of the Tyra and its song that
the Tyra is a him and a song to Hashem.
So why is quoting the Z because the Zah
does call Tyra
not only a praise it calls
a a song.
So here the gumar says that dwood was
punished
because he called tyra just songs and
desire attributes
the virtue of tyra to song. How do you
reconcile that? So obviously there are
levels that's the the short answer to
the question is it depends what level
you're talking about. Let's see how he
develops it.
[Music]
We need to understand what is the praise
of Hashem of God
that something's forbidden or permitted.
Um,
in other words,
it's it's a compared to
how great are your actions, God.
Your thoughts are very deep. Why does
the verse the question is why does the
Pik make the deed precede the thought?
Right? Normally you first have it in
your mak in your thought and for your
mak it comes to the p doesn't say that
number one
how great are your actions first the
emphasis is on my action and only
secondly
how deep is your
why is that
so we'll explain that from From an
appreciation of Hashem's great works,
one begins to understand the depth of
his thoughts.
Just for a second, I heard this from
Rabbi Gordon, but it's it's a good
thought, good way. We see that the
details of Msa
from the from knowing the action, we
understand the thought it works.
H how is that? How is that? He says,
take for example the computer. The
computer, if there's something missing
in the in the exact URL or if there's a
a period that's missing, you can't find
the the address.
In other words, the details of the
precise details of the mice of the
action
sets the right tone, gets you to the
right place.
So you could philosophize and have
thoughts and all of that but if it's not
associated with poel in messa and not
just in my in the details of messa the
thought is irrelevant and the thought
can be just a a superolous experience
that that's you know just ethereal and
has nothing to do with practicality.
Let's continue now.
It is known that all worlds,
the upper worlds and the lower worlds
depends on the meticulous performance of
one single mitzvah.
You know, we talk about tipping the
scales
in our favor in heaven.
It takes so it takes just but one
mitzvah.
We continue top of 367 that for example
if a carbon is to be valid
that causes what we call a superal
unification
and and causing that all worlds
ascend to receive their vitality
and their flow.
However,
if a person while bringing a sacrifice
change the detail
of the of the of the laws of bringing a
sacrifice or doing what for example
you know we have the aod service in in
the musf
and we also have an air of pes we read
say the pes when you the blood of the
animal
it had to be done with your right hand
for a righty
what if a righty was mabble the blood
with his left hand it's invalid
so this is the detailb says here what if
you did the carpet and you did
everything except one little detail
instead of the right you used your left
so the the iseladam
If you received ex the the blood with
your left hand, it's invalid.
For example,
another example,
the vessel that you used to for the for
the for the blood was not a kosher
vessel,
rendering the activity invalid.
O a third detail.
There was a separation
an intervention of a foreign body
between the coen and the vessel
that makes it also invalid. The point
being that is showing us here are three
examples
that if you did the act you slaughtered
the animal properly you went to your
line to the b mikdash you brought the
carbon but there's only one little thing
you did you you stuck out your left hand
to do instead of your right hand invalid
by mistake you took the kayie that's not
kosher that's tummy invalid
But I did everything else right
and I slept from
all the way to or wherever. You're
telling me
that all my hard work
was for not because I stuck my left hand
out instead of my right hand.
It's a very those are details but that's
the point. In the details you find the
the essence. Let's continue.
When when when
these details are violated,
you cause
a cization, a nullification
of the spiritual worlds
in receiving their energy and their flow
from the life of life, God, Hashem,
who is
Let's take the example of
it says in
when you put on a kosher parin you cause
the revelation of what's called
superernal
wisdom of zo we'll just leave it at that
but it's it's a high level
which is the source of life for all
worlds. Next page 368.
Yet through the omission when you put on
film of one required detail, they all
are invalidated
and the intellect departs.
The same applies to the detail
requirements of the prohibited
commandments.
The one who meditates, who reflects
on what?
How great are the works of God
that through the multiplicity of the
worlds and all of their hosts
and how everything is literally null
in comparison to the specific a a a
minute detail that's a requirement of of
of the title
the title
For this is the profoundity of the
supreme thought and divine wisdom. The
profontity is what mah it is the detail.
You know we think the profontity of
hashem is in the grandiose.
Oh the big zah the big mah.
It's the small guy. It's the small
detail.
Don't underestimate the power
of the minute of the detail because for
in the detail lies the kavana
and the entire the entire depth of
hashem the entire greatness of hashem
depends on the detail. So if if a detail
is invalid it's an invalid act. That's
the point he's making.
For through the observance of one minor
specification,
all worlds ascend
and receive their sustenance, their
energy, and their flow.
When you don't have it, if it's the
opposite, you make a change. You don't
go forbid.
It's not that way.
This
brings to mind the reflective
state of realizing how God is so deep.
which is in infinitely transcends the
vitality of all worlds.
He repeats the at least it sounds that
way that the entire vivifying power
issues forth from a minor requirement.
This requirement being drawn
from its source
is namely the depth of Hashem's thought
and he gives the example
hair. Everyone you have your hair you
like your hair. Yesterday we spoke about
not combing your hair making yourself
fancy and everything else. If you didn't
hear this she yesterday's shar it's the
only place in Tanya D speaks about hair
dos. Okay.
You know, I'll never forget when 19
91 or 1991 when we had our court case
for our Kabad House in Marin County. It
was a zoning zoning issue
and
for some reason we filed the the the the
homeowners association with some
individuals
took the county of Marin Marin County
to court
not kabad because they the county issued
us a use permit a variance
So they took them to court and we were
an accomplice. You don't understand.
Anyway, but the bottom line is we had to
defend ourselves.
That's a it's a whole story. I wrote a
whole book on it called Kabat House. All
the court proceedings. Do we have any
lawyers here? I don't think we have any
lawyers here. Anyway, it's really a
lawyer's book. You know, all the
details. Anyway, so
the
the the Superior Court, the Marine
County Superior Court judge,
he wrote a 42page
ruling against us, against the county,
and against us.
And um
you know, 42 pages is 42 pages. It's
not, you know, five pages.
And I remember picking up Rabbi Schlomma
Kunan, the the you know the head of
Kabad houses in in California. He came
he had to see a property of his in
Berkeley. The mikvah building at the
time was was owned by by Rabbi Cunin. He
bought it back in the early '7s. There
should be a mikvah in Berkeley
and that's where everyone went. All the
women went to the mikvah was in the
beginning. There was no there was only
one mikvah. It was there or San
Francisco. And in San Francisco, I don't
think it was a kabad mikva borab. And in
Berkeley, it was built by kabad. It was
borab. So everyone came from Marin, from
PaloAlto, from from, you know, East Bay,
North Bay, West Bay. Everyone came
there. Anyway,
um,
so I picked him up at the airport at the
San Francisco airport. I forgot what
it's called now, whatever.
And um
I told him, "Rabbi Cunan,
I'm in deep trouble. I had a 42page
court ruling against us having a
kabaras. What do I do now? You have any
advice? Can you help?"
So this is what he said to me. And and
this is where you see experience, life
experience is valuable. You know, us
already AKs with the white beards, you
know. Um, the young generation don't
want to hear don't want to hear about
us. You know, we're over the hill,
but there's something they don't have.
It's called experience. And they never
will have it.
And we have it. Our parents, the
grandparents have it more. But
experience is invaluable. It's uh you
can't you can't you can't buy it at
Sears and Alexander. Alexander doesn't
exist anymore. existed in my days in in
in Brooklyn.
Anyway, so so Kuna says like this. This
is listen what he says. Says, I always
ded I always prayed
that when my enemy when my opposition
will attack me, they'll do it in a big
way. In a big way with a big splurge all
over the newspapers.
So you're telling me you got a 42page?
You should be thankful the guy wrote 42
pages against you guys.
Imagine he would have written one page.
You wouldn't have what to poke holes in
and find his errors. But now that all 42
pages, you can choose page 12, page 17,
page 28, and you can find this thinking
is wrong and this thinking is wrong and
shoot down his argument.
That's what he said.
And he was so right. Because when we
appeal to the the state the state
appellet court,
they shot down the 42 pages like it was
excuse me toilet paper
mamish.
But why I'm saying this is because of
the hair
where this was after the 1989 San Franc
Bay Area earthquake for those that
remember. I mean I lived through it.
I remember exactly where I was standing
when the earthquake happened
and um
so the court building
was was dilapitated was was at a
commission was was you know you couldn't
go in was dangerous so where did they
have the court in a plush highrise
around San Francisco downtown San
Francisco
and I went in there I've told you this
many times I went in there was mish you
felt what the go says
the
the human court, the civil court below
is analogous has a similarity to
to the heavenly court to God's heavenly
court. Why do I feel that way? cuz we
came to such a fancy building and the
and the room the the plush the carpet
the the chairs it was like I never you
know I wasn't I wasn't in that world it
was very fancy a very rich feeling and
then they were the three judges were
seated on top on a day
it it was mish and we were all below it
just you know laavd I say laavd remind
me of the reb was faban. The Reb would
sit on top by the tables. Behind them
are the elders and we all were below
but in the basement of 770 with broken
benches. Okay.
And here it was in a a high-rise of San
Francisco new building.
And then came their lawyer who who
wasn't the law. I don't know if he was
the lawyer for the lower the lower
division.
Tall guy.
Uh I think he was Italian or Irish.
You know, this guy was a mover and a
shaker. He knew the body movements. He
knew he was like it was a show.
And what stood out another thing is why
I'm reminding myself about this and
telling this long drawn out story is
because of his hairo.
I remember he had so much hair but it
was stylish and it was like and we had
our lawyer was Sanford Rosen Sandy
Rosen. Look him up. He was the lead
lawyer in the 1974
Kent State Ohio case the shooting. The
lawyer there who won the case was Sandy
Rosen.
He was born in Crown Heights in the
Crown Heights Hospital on Lefforts and
Crown on Lefforts which is now base
Rifka.
And he was a Jewish boy and he was in
the same class as Alan Derswood's at
Yale.
And I remember meeting him and you know
he's a yeid and he comes from the east
coast and it was a really uh we we we
related you know
but I remember when the first time I met
him he had a a briefcase and that
briefcase reminded me of my rebies my
teachers who came to yeshiva in the 19
late in the 60s and 70s7s
and it was it was like so reminiscent of
80 years back, you know, that little
briefcase and you bent over and you walk
into your you know to your job. It was
like it was it it wasn't it wasn't those
the new briefcases the square ones that
you know had the locks. This was like
the I forget. It was
it was it was maybe stronger. It was uh
you know leather leather brief. You know
what I'm talking about those bags
briefcases
and and and and here it is. Sandy Rosen
in San Francisco
1990991.
He had such a briefcase. So I say to
myself, Hayam Dolphin, oh my gosh, how
is this guy going to put up with this
Italian stylish, you know, mafioso?
It's like going to be a wipeout.
He came into court,
he was quiet. The other guy was throwing
himself and making and shooting and
saying lies. And my lawyer just made one
point. I've told you this. They accused
us of
religious entanglement.
And that's against the United the United
States Constitution,
the separation of church and state. And
religion is not allowed to entangle
itself into church. And right
and look what this Yale Yale genius came
up with. He said it's not entanglement.
What the government did for you, what
the what the county of Marin did for
Kabad was it was religious
accommodation.
And guess what? The three judges bought
it and they said he was right and they
overturned the lower court's decision
and the rest is history. I mean they
went to the to the state supreme court
and was thrown out. It was not even a
case.
But one of the things that stands out
about this I forget his name, you know,
was there this hair do. So we're talking
here about hair.
Hair
can be very powerful
and the proof is that hair keeps on
growing
and it's attached to the skull. In other
words, hair has
has vitality, has life. If it wouldn't
have life, it couldn't grow. Yi, so the
fact that it's growing shows it has
life. But
it can easily be abused when you start
playing with your hair. That's what we
learned in yesterday's shar.
Now
doesn't talk about the this aspect of
hair, but he speaks about another
aspect. Look inside, please.
Man's hair issues issues forth from his
brain.
is known from.
So why does he bring this here?
In other words, he's bringing this here
to tell you is like this that on one
hand hair is an obstacle. You could use
it to to abuse abuse to to to
show off to show off to be playful with
your hair. Remember we learned yesterday
the language hill misal bisaro
I think he used the word frickling
freckling I forget the word you used
yesterday you know playing with your
hair
it means curling in Hebrew curling okay
in curling you know this yeah right
exactly sounds
so on one hand the hair is an obstacle
on the other hand hair comes from the
brain
And that's what makes it grow.
Is saying
that the same is true with this that
we're talking about here. The
of one mitzvah of one of of dict of one
piece of the detail
on one end you could say it's it's
nothing. It's like only a detail.
But he's saying that this detail in this
detail constitutes the entire
experience. That's the message he want
he's getting at over here in this
section in Tanya. We're going to uh stop
now and meet.
Um yeah, we'll learn more tomorrow.
We'll finish it. We'll see. Anyway, any
questions? I know I still one second. Um
Hil, I didn't get back to you yet. I
hope today to look into it. Yes, Misha.
Okay,
we've got long
to work it through. Okay. Yeah,
she and gone tomorrow.
What?
We can call today sheer here today and
gone tomorrow.
Yes. Ma,
what are we talking about? So, it's the
ultim speaking about the trip. You
speaking about the trip? Yeah,
definitely. Definitely. Yeah, I'm glad
you brought up that word cuz that's
that's what I heard growing up in from
my father. Get take it take your chup
off. I don't know. Chup is not an
English word. Troop what kind? It's a
Yiddish word. I don't know where it
comes from. What
you mean?
Moa, how do you explain what shook
means? Chup means that the front hair
here.
Yeah. But yeah, but yeah, but you see
it. You can see it very motion. You can
see it very see. Look at Brim and
Cotish. They come in with their hat like
this perched like this almost somehow
not falling off their head. They've got
their hair is short here and they get
this big bunch of hair right there.
Right. In English is called the qua.
It's called the qua.
qua. That's exactly it. Mosa, you
explained it well. Mosha, you said the
right word. That's called a ch. I don't
know if it's yiddish or polish or
Russian and and if you walk through what
if you walk through certain
neighborhoods, you cannot not see every
buffer whose pas are down like this.
They're just walking. They're constantly
playing with their pas constantly.
What does it have to do with?
Well, going back to the crinkling the
curling the hair. No, no. They Oh, what?
You're Wait, wait, wait, wait. You're
saying that they're they're be they're
be they're they're beautifying
themselves through through curling their
their payers. That's what you're saying.
Okay.
What what I what I grew up with is what
Misha Misha said before, the chup, you
know, and he said it well. You know, you
see their hats are back. It's it's
obvious they they they want to I never
thought I never thought of whatever I
never thought of that that that have
these payers that they're on the
contrary is what they do in Burough Park
also. I of course they do but but they
they they it's like a nervous hazard.
Wait. No, no, no. They believe it has to
do I have to check with these guys my
friends here. You think it's bitter? I
think No, they they say they say it has
to do something with I I I don't know. I
I I think there's something that they
they say that it's a soldier with
holiness. Whether it is or not, I don't
know. But I I I don't believe that
they're they're trying to show off
through curling the pace. That's what
you're saying, right?
I'm just I'm making an observation.
They're constantly playing with the pas
curling the pace. Walking down the
street. It's see it all the time when
I'm driving to work. Every is out
there playing with his pis. Okay,
everyone. Good conversation about chup
and pis. You have one tomorrow. Z is I
have an idea to answer. Hello, by the
way. What? Your grandson's question. Oh,
we we you want to hear it now? Yeah, you
got a minute.
each resides primarily primarily in a
part of the body right associated with
the brain the heart or the liver and
then spreads from those organs to the
other to the rest of the body. So and
any individual cell is replaced.
So when that when the the the the kayak
from the neuron
ceases in that cell, it's replaced by a
new cell that receives the receives the
the life force. Very good answer. Very
good. Very good. Hill, put your grandson
in touch with with Dr. Iser
Dr. Iser the cabalist. Classic. There's
a classic philosophical
uh puzzle. If you take a ship and you
have a pile of wood and nails next to
the ship, you take one nail out of the
ship and replace it with one of the
other nails. Then you take a board and
you replace with a board and you take
Right. It's an identity question because
essentially you you remove piece by
piece the original ship, but you rebuild
it. So which is this ship? the one that
has the new parts or the one that was
rebuilt with the old parts. It's a
classic philosophical
Yeah. Your grandson's question reminded
me of Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Have one
tomorrow. Byebye. Take care.