Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
How Can Torah Never Be Wrong? — Parshas Shoftim
957 views
Rashi comments on a verse in this week's portion that we should follow the rulings of Torah judges “even if the judge tells you that right is left, and that left is right." Does this mean that if reality is one way, and a rabbi makes a halachic decision the opposite way, the Torah wants us to go against reality? The answer can be found in the difference between laws that respond to reality and laws that create reality. Based on Likkutei Sichos vol. 5, pp. 127-8.
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
if a man speaks
alone in a forest and his wife's not
there to hear him
is he still wrong this week's
torah portion parsha shayft him tells us
something very interesting about when
rabbis teach us
and they are seemingly incorrect when
they're seemingly wrong
tata says
according to the law they instruct you
and according to the judgment they say
to you
you shall do
mean
you mean do not divert do not waver
from the word that they tell you right
or left whatever the rabbi's ruling is
don't divert from it stay to it don't
divert to the right or to the left
rashi in his commentary
takes those two words you mean us to the
right or to the left
and says
[Applause]
even if they tell you right is left and
left is right
that's what it means do not divert from
the word they tell you right or left
means even if they tell you the right is
the left and the left is the right
the kosher king so how much more so how
much more so
she's when they tell you mean val small
small when they tell you right is right
and left is left because even if they
would tell you right is left and left is
right you would
listen to them unwaveringly so how much
more so when they tell you that right is
right and left is left
you should listen to them unwaveringly
okay
so this is obviously very interesting
this is something that a thoughtful
intelligent person would want to
understand better because
at first glance at least it sounds like
we're supposed to be in denial of
reality and that's it you just
avoid reality deny reality um
if that's what it is that's what it is
but it it seems funny that that
it seems funny to think that that's what
it would mean so
um
i want to tell you a story but the story
is a story within a story
and then there's a side story before the
story
you'll see the story
is just a little bit of background
that over the years the
the rabbit would ask
many times that rabbis not just
congregational rabbis pulpit rabbis but
rabbis who
are um in a position to make halachic
authoritative halachic judgments what we
call a pasik
or a uh a halaq
judge or or ruler that such rabbis
should render halachic decisions stating
clearly
that according to shalhan according to
the code of jewish law
it is forbidden to give away land
in israel it is forbidden for the jewish
people
or any jewish person to give away land
in israel
to our enemies now just to clarify that
abba's position
and why the rabbit was saying this was a
halachic position
this has nothing to do with zionism
this has nothing to do with
nationalistic aspirations
um in fact it has nothing to do
specifically with the land of israel
it has to do with the preservation of
life as dictated by jewish law
specifically
chapter 329 of
uh 329
6. and over there it says that if jews
live in a border town that means a town
which is vulnerable because it's close
to
uh the border and the enemy
is mobilizing or showing any before they
even attack
but they are showing any type of uh
desire to to come to to go to combat
that even on shabbos we have to defend
ourselves even you know
the shabbos is pushed off in order to uh
to defend ourselves and we have to treat
the situation as a situation of life and
death
so the entire israel is on the border
it's not a very large country it's on
the border
and uh therefore it has to be treated
as a situation where there is
there's a threat to life and
therefore we are not allowed to increase
our vulnerability god forbid
and we have to defend ourselves so that
is a halal point just about
saving life and not having to do
anything necessarily with
with the holiness of the land or with
the nationalistic aspirations of the
jewish people to
to once more be in our homeland this is
just a simple law
of uh preserving life at any rate the
point is that there the rabbit many
times
many many times over the years asked
that people who are qualified to render
halal decisions should render a halachic
decision
that it is forbidden to compromise the
jewish
security in in the jewish land by giving
away
or even discussing uh giving away land
now that's the background on
one of these occasions when the rabbi
was asking
rabbis to render such rulings
specifically
this occasion was matsushabe sprecious
tough shin mem alef
the rabbi was saying that you know rabbi
should make such rulings and then ever
asked
a question asked now you might say
what's the point of this
because the people who are in a position
to give away the land are not
necessarily torah observant
or they necessarily are not torah
observant or many of them
um so why would they care about a
halachic ruling
right oh you're going to have rabbis
come out with a halachic ruling
okay but these people don't follow
halakhah or
are they shamer shabbos
so those things in their own lives they
don't keep they're going to hear a
halachic ruling
for something that they under so much
pressure to do in diplomatic pressure
political pressure all of a sudden now
they're going to be from they're going
to listen to a halachic ruling
so the rabbi explained that's not the
point and how did the rabbi explain
with a story so here's the story within
the story
the story that ebba told is a story of
the raga chaver
gone
harav yasif rosen
who was known as the rugachovergon the
genius of rogachov because he was
that's where he lived most of his years
although the story i'm about to tell you
takes place in leningrad where he lives
for a short period of time
and gone means the genius and he was an
absolute genius he had
the entirety of the oral law
at his fingertips just a computer mind
and had
penetrating uh insight and and
depth and analysis uh he was a
he was a rov for many years in dvinsk
and he was he was known as just a a an
incredible
uh scholar and in fact there are
correspondences between the rabbi and
the raga chaver
when the when the rebel was much younger
they were contemporaneous the the roger
chavez
uh passed away in 1936
at any rate so this story takes place
when the rogue trevor was living in
leningrad
and in fact i told you there's a story
within a story and then a side story let
me tell you the side story first just
because i'm mentioning the ruger trevor
living in leningrad
so i'll tell you the side story about
leningrad um
this was in the 1920s it was actually
at the same time derogatory lived in
leningrad it was the same time for a
period
that that the sixth rabbit
the rebel yachts of yitzchak
lived in leningrad at the same time it
was after
the la babachirebas left the town of
lobavich
during world war one and uh which was
you know 1917 around the time of the
revolution
in russia so for for a short period of
time in the 1930s the the sixth rabbit
lived in leningrad
so anyways the story is that there was a
lubavitcher hosted
the simcha garadetsky and
he saw the rogotova when he was in
leningrad
and he when he introduced himself
he says i've come to lenigrad to the
rabbit.
and the raga trevor said to rebecca he
says you've come to the rabbit in
leningrad
he says yes i've come to leningrad to
the rabbit he said no no
did you come to the rabbit in leningrad
or do you come to leningrad
to the rabbit because there are 16
nafka means there are 16 differences
actually i'm sorry 17. there are 17
practical differences in halacha one of
them
that i'll tell you why i said 16 because
he says there are 17 in total
one of them is whether or not you are
obligated to eat in asuka
that's one of them the other 16
that's where i remember the number 16
from he says the other 16
if you care you can figure it out so
17 afghanistan there are 17 practical
halachic difference
differences that will emerge from
whether or not you formulate your
statement as
i've come to the rabbit in laningrad or
i came to leningrad to the rabbit
okay at any rate the point is you know
the mind of the raga chaver that he knew
17 practical differences in holocaust
all right
but here's the story that i want to tell
you so if you remember
i was saying that the rabbit was saying
that rabbanim that
that that rabbis should make halachic
uh decisions that you're not not allowed
to give away land
and then the demo asked well the people
who are in a position to give the
give away this land are not going to
listen anyways because they're not
necessarily holocally observant
okay so that ever said fine so i'll tell
you i'll tell you a story
and they never told the story that when
the dragon chaver was in leningrad
here's the story they want to tell you
that guitar was in leningrad and uh
so this was in the time
of the the the bolsheviks this is after
the revolution
so the communists
sent him a tax bill so he gets the tax
bill
and the tax bill was actually itemized
it was broken down
into two different taxes so the
dogetover had a grandson
who was also very very
intelligent i'm sure you know if he had
his grandfather's genes he was
you know we would consider him a genius
uh and he also was very
um well versed in
secular law and he just he knew he knew
things
you know he had a lot of worldly
knowledge so there ago chavez showed his
grandson this tax bill
and he asked him to he said explain to
me what these taxes are for
so his grandson was very world worldly
like like we mentioned so he was able to
explain
that this this taxes for this this taxes
for this and he explained to him
the nature of the taxes so you ever
heard this and he
looks to his grandson and he says this
tax
according to toyota i'm obligated to pay
if the government asks for such a tax
according to toyota
you have to pay it this tax i'm not
obligated to pay according to tata
you don't have to pay i'm not paying it
go pay pay the one that taylor says
you're obligated to pay don't pay the
one theta says you're not obligated to
pay
now you don't want to mess around with
communists right they they weren't like
such nice
people not you know the bolsheviks
they're not like you know such
reasonable people right so
kind of bold to say this one tater says
pay this one tata says you don't have to
pay don't pay it right
but that's what that'll trevor says a
few days later
they get a letter in the mail correction
from the government from the or from the
communist party or you know i guess
that's the same thing
um sorry we we your
your tax bill was an error and you're
only obligated to pay this tax not the
other tax
so what's the point of the story
the point of the story is not just
that the raga chava was able to look at
a situation
and determine what would be the toyota
perspective in that situation
the point of the story is that the raga
chava was able to say what the tater
perspective is on the situation
and his saying it actually changed
the reality changed the reality
so when the traveler passkind when he
made a halachic ruling
this tax i have to pay this tax i don't
have to pay so therefore the reality
conformed
to the saktin to the halaq ruling
that episode that's the same point here
when we come out with rulings about what
the government should do
in in in the holy land it's not because
we necessarily think that they're
listening to halacha
but when arov makes up sakdin
when he makes a halachic ruling there's
a kayak
there's a power that trader has and
specifically
a halachic ruling
a practical legal rendering of the
toyota
and that that ruling actually
has the power to make things happen in
reality
we say i mean according to the zayer
that
stockholm that when hashem created the
world he looked into the toyota and he
created the world
there's a famous hayem yam that abby
wrote a book called
with their teaching every day so the
hayem for
base schwart which happens to also be
the
over there it says there are two kinds
of laws there are laws that create life
and laws that respond to life so secular
law
human law are laws that respond to life
you look at the world you see their
certain conditions
and you make laws to respond or to react
to
this situation then there's trader law
tater law isn't responding to the
conditions of this world tater law
actually is creating the conditions of
this world
and when there's a ruling according to
toyota it actually determines
that the reality should be that way so
now we can understand what rashi was
telling us
when rashi said even if the judge will
tell you that right is left and left is
right
does that mean that if reality is one
way
and the rabbi makes a halal decision and
tells you know reality is a different
way
that we should go against reality no
that's not what it means
it means that is actually changing
reality
it's not man-made laws that respond to a
pre-existing
reality tata is the blueprint for
reality
so this is what we have to understand
on one hand trader takes into account
the realities of this world for instance
classic example
when a rabbi has to rule whether or not
you break shabbos
for for a sick person so the rabbi will
base his ruling
on the advice of a doctor rabbi doesn't
decide whether or not the person's sick
enough the doctor decides
or when a rabbi has to make a ruling
about a certain technology whether it's
permissible use on shabbos for for
example
so you have to listen to the to the
scientists who understand how that
technology works
so when a rabbi makes a ruling he or
like the douga trevor who
asked his grandson who understood law
explain to me what what the the basis of
these taxes are
right so a rabbi has to take and take
into account the reality
but but
that doesn't mean that the the rabbi is
subservient
to the facts as they are presently it
means
you take into account those facts
and then peter gives its ruling
and then that ruling has the has the
power to influence reality
so based on all of this
maybe it won't surprise you if i will
tell you also
that in addition to the rulings that
that ever asked for
over the years that
rabbis should rule about safety and
security in the land of israel
there was something else that the rabbit
asked
that the rabbis should make halachic
rulings about
on many many occasions that ever asked
that the rabbis should rule
that according to it is time already for
mashiach to come
not just it's a nice thing we want
meshia we'd be very happy if meshiach
comes
no according to according to our
tradition
according to everything that we know
according to the to the to the oral law
as it's been transmitted to us
faithfully in an unbroken chain
our tradition shows us that it's time
for meshiach it's not just a feeling
it's not just a hope
it's time for mishir to come when
the the svardic chief rabbi of israel
of uh leo came to the river
so that was one of the things that i
never spoke with him about that he
and other rabbis who are in leadership
positions should make this ruling that
it's time already for meshich to come
and that when we make such a ruling or
when rabbis who are in a position to
make such a ruling
make these rulings that this actually
helps to bring about the reality may it
be
speedily now