Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Shnayim Yomi - Vayigash - Shishi - #6 - Rabbi Mordechai Schiffman - How We Remember the Past
32 views
Check out our website https://www.shnayimyomi.org/ Join our WhatsApp group for a daily video https://chat.whatsapp.com/C3UORKddbCW64FkrvMPo8q?mode=ems_share_t Follow us on TorahAnytime https://torahanytime.com/organizations/165
Categories:Torah/Tanach
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
For the sixth aliyah of paras, I would
like to share with you an insight that I
wrote in my book psyched for Torah. When
we think about the past, there are facts
about what happened, but there's also
interpretation.
Psychology distinguishes between past
negative and past positive time
perspectives. A past negative
perspective focuses on trauma, loss,
failure. It is associated with
rumination, with depression. A past
positive perspective does not deny
difficulty but emphasizes survival,
protection and meaning. This orientation
supports engagement in the present and
planning for the future. Yakov's life
included several significant traumas. He
had threats from Asov, exploitations by
love, family conflict, Rachel's death,
and the presumed loss of Yoseph. When
Parro asks his age, Yakov responds that
his life has been short and bad. This is
an explicitly past negative framing. A
medish quoted by Dasan critiques Yakov's
response. Yakov should have shifted his
perspective. He was saved from Asov and
Lavan. Dino was returned. Yoseph was
alive. The measure states that for each
word Yakov spoke, a year was taken from
his life. Rabbi Dr. Abraham Jorski asks
that this seems to be in contradiction
to a different major. Another majorizes
Yakov for saying during Yoseph's
disappearance that Hashem turned away
from him. Yet that statement carries no
punishment. Why is Jacob accountable
here but not there? Rabbi Tski explains
that there's a difference between
experiencing a perspective during
suffering and a perspective after
suffering. During suffering the acute
pain, people may not be able to be held
to the same standard. But after
resolution, after safety, a shift in
perspective is expected. Yakov is held
accountable not for suffering, but for
how he evaluated the past once the
suffering has passed.
We cannot judge our forefathers, nor
should we judge how people respond to
trauma. But the badish presents a clear
lesson. To the extent that we can shift
from a past negative to a past positive
perspective, we function better in the
present and plan more effectively for
the future. As we saw earlier in the
para, this is precisely the capacity
that Yoseph demonstrates.