0:00 / 0:00
Shnayim Yomi - Mishpatim - Sheni - #2 - Rabbi Akiva Zweig - If You Were on the Receiving End
32 views
Check out our website https://www.shnayimyomi.org/ Join our WhatsApp group for a daily video https://chat.whatsapp.com/C3UORKddbCW64FkrvMPo8q?mode=ems_share_t Follow us on TorahAnytime https://torahanytime.com/organizations/165
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Here
in the second aliyah of paraspim, the
Torah teaches us the famous law of an
eye for an eye.
Now the have always understood ever
since the Torah was given on that an eye
for an eye is not meant literally. The
legal definition of
Shane an eye for an eye or a tooth for a
tooth is to pay the damage of the value
that it would cost to have a servant
with an eye versus a servant without an
eye. A servant having the tooth or
missing the tooth. So it's always
defined in terms of monetary
compensation for the damage that was
done by a person to another person's
eye, another person's tooth or any other
limb, etc. Now the obvious question is
that the Torah could have easily found a
way to say pay for the damage that you
do to a human being. Like the Torah says
for example by an animal,
one who damages an animal needs to pay.
Why does the Torah go out of its way to
teach something that is not literally
true? We do not require that a eye be
knocked out by a person who knocked out
someone else's eye. And perhaps the
Torah is teaching us that we need to be
so careful in our understanding of
damage that we cause other people.
Sometimes we might think, okay, so we
hit another person's car. How much did
that really damage them? We can pay for
it. or god forbid we injured bodily
another person. What the Torah is
telling us is that the perspective of
every Jew needs to be that if that
damage happened to me, how would I feel?
What would I be willing to pay that that
damage should never happen to me?
Usually, it's going to be significantly
more than the cost of the actual damage.
So even though we try to make the other
person whole by paying monetarily for
the damages, the Torah is telling you
that on a metaphysical level, the
damager really does deserve as if to
lose his own eye if he knocked out
someone's eye. And the same would be
true of all damages. This is how careful
we need to be not to damage other
people. How much would we want to avoid
such a damage happening to our own eye?