Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Okay, good morning dear friends. You
should be blessed. It's Arab Pes and
you're learning of Thank you for hanging
in there.
The Mishalid
discusses a woman who's aime
she's waiting to do. And now the
question is can the yam can the yam be
made for theim of this woman who falls
to him? So the garra says it's a
three-way mus
between
and Yeshua and Rabaka whether you could
be made for theim of maybe these three
when they were in Ben and they were
whether they uh maybe they discussed
this after the came and they said
so after shakus maybe they discussed
This by the way once we're on we said
over yesterday in Shabas that why does
the say that they were
and if they were in a lot it would make
a difference what difference does make
that that they were in furthermore
what's the significance
so writes in it's also in a footnote
that this was the of
Now Hmon try to be mat matzah. they had
to fast that year on PES and if there's
no matzah there's no
so in order to rectify the sin of their
ancestor there were
now what else did
he went in the morning says
so therefore the
were
they said
Anyway, but these tan also debated
whether a shimeas yam could be maf than
a darim of the woman who falls to them
in ya rabzar who says they could be maf.
He holds y zika
but the question is there is a tana that
holds even if there two in that fall he
could be made for the nadarim. So the
garra says we're talking about where the
one that you could be made for you did
to you did to that one and holds. Okay
fine. So all the rash yes
shakavid pavarski
rovski the stipler going they all asked
the following question. Even the
man only holds
but not.
So how would Zika explain how you could
be made for the nadarum of your wife?
Ifa
I could understand the ishos right
Michael we were discussing earlier
whether what allows a husband to be made
from the of his wife. Is it the fact
that he supports her and in lie of that
he can be made for nadarim or is that is
it a reality of the ishas? So in this
you see that it it seems like it's the
it's the reality of the bond that allows
him is
that's exchange for the livelihood. In
any event, the the rashiva asks since
the conclusion in yamus is only
why would yik explain how you could be
made for the nadarim of a of a wife. So
let's see if we could get this up on the
screen.
Um
Mhm.
I think
the there really two aspects of marriage
and therefore there are two aspects of
zika.
There's the relationship,
there's the relationship, there's the
ishus, the marriage, and there's the
kenyan.
There's the fact that this woman is user
to the whole world. She's your wife and
there's an isva to everybody else.
That's the ishus element of the
marriage. And then there's the kenyan
element. You own her. You you have a
kenyan. you have uh you have a certain
proprietary
right and ownership. There's a financial
aspect of it.
And what uh the rashisha say is that
zika therefore has two dimensions to it.
It has a dimension of ishus
and it has a dimension of kenyan.
The ability of a person to be may in a d
of a wife that comes from the kenyan not
from the ishas
and listen the when we say that zika if
you hold zika it's man that's only the
ishas is man and therefore if somebody
lives with her they're not living with a
isa they're not living with ana
they're living with an
but The Kenyan aspect. Everybody says
the Kenyan aspect is full-fledged. That
would entitle you to be made for the
Nadarim. The Nadarim come from the
Kenyan. Let's see if I could before we
see in
Let's see if I could read what it says.
He says that the rashish say
there's the fact that the woman is koi
to you and then there's an a a kurva a a
relation between the husband and the
wife that's created through the zika.
Um
the ability of Hafar's Nadarim emanates
from the Kenyan aspect
emanate from the ishos.
So even according to the zikan
that's the ishos and the isayasan.
But regarding the Kenyan
then
then the would be
here take a look at what says he former
even according to the accord
being it's worse
than a Kenyan. It's it's worse than
Kenyan.
However,
it's worse than that to inherit her
because inheriting this is interesting.
Inheriting a woman that comes not from
the it comes from the isos being tummy
to the woman is
the
bus.
Listen carefully. An has is considered
more of a than a zuka. A zuka is not
there's no basar at all to a zuka.
Therefore, a woman who you're zak to,
you don't inherit. You can't be mama to
her if you're a coen. Because the
ability to beame, the ability to that
comes from the
there are two aspects of zik there's the
aspect and there are two aspects aspects
of marriage. There's the ishus, the
basar, and there's the kenyan. The anus
is more of a even than a
even than a zuka.
We were discussing this that an arous do
we do we think that maybe something
happened? You see here the saying openly
there's more basar by even then as a
kuka tum the tum and the yusha are
dependent on
on isim
that's
then the zaka is more of a kenyan even
than an ara that's amazing because you
did a kenyan
it's almost counterintuitive somebody
were to ask what is and what is what is
nuin you would say is the kenyan and
nuin is the basar
but here the is saying there's more
by the
ken you wouldn't have expected that
because
that's the full kenyan but still
I guess the kenyion of ishas
is stronger
by a zuka.
Wow.
There's a canyon of there's there's a
byuka
that you don't have by but only
regarding things that are connected to
look at the unusual status of a zaka.
It's a very unusual status regarding
Isus.
There's less I ishos than Arusa.
regarding Kenyan there's almost Kenyan
Kenua
and therefore you could be made for an
that's again this is in the
we say
um
says
This is what we explained.
Okay, that's the
uh small point that I want to share with
you this morning
and stay tuned for this week's Dasha
schedule. Definitely Monday night,
whether we do Sunday night or Tuesday
night, stay tuned. Okay,
have a good day everyone. KV
