Rabbi Shapiro Video Country Hollow

You talk about the Rebita about Zionism first we have to understand what Zionism is and most people don't understand and I want to tell you that when the Reb wrote Mosha a lot of people make a choice they think that Velish is the Reb's explanation of what's wrong with Zionism it's not not it that's not why he wrote Vel Mosha V moa was about making a Medina a Medina and Zionism are two different things. In fact, there's three different things. Thing number one, there's a hashkafid call what we call hashka sayita. It's a hashkov. It's a it's an ideology. You don't even need people should have it. The person can make an ideology on paper or whatever he wants. You don't even need a medina forism. There were there was counsism before Medina in fact one of the great atum wrote in an article in its magazine I think it was I don't remember but I saw it better Zionism without Zion than to have Zion without Zionism that means better we should be on a Medina than to be have a Medina and not beat that's what he said there's a There's and a medina three things and each one is a separate I'm going to write this down over here. [Music] three separate things. There's Zionism, Zionists and Medina. How we deal with Zionism is one para. How we deal with Zionists is another para and how we deal with the Medina is another para. So first what's Zionism? Now in the rebar he speaks ruba duba about either Zionists kim or the medina but there is a place now there's two until a few years ago there's only one where he tiches up claw what's zionism what's the ideology of zionism and I have over here from the kadushe mibus in paras Pinus. Now there's no tape on this Russia because this was set on Shabas. I think it was 1955 in ben brain mus and he's talking about ifit now terrible a he says has nothing to do with the if you speak you're going the you become a like and the a no shas with the shashu Yes. Yes. But that doesn't explain the here. He explains it. Now listen carefully. The the words Whoism [Music] har nationalism. [Music] And now listen to this because this is the quote. I'll tell you why it's whoever wrote this over didn't put the mocker in but these last words is a quote from whoever wrote this didn't write that it's [Music] a quote from and this was the China against Zionism Zionism was a ideology that said thatro is an that means that what makes the French people French France French food the French language um and whatever else French f they do in France. What makes the Italians Italians? The Italian language, the land, the culture. What makes the yidden the yidden? The the nothing else. There is nothing else that makes. No common land, no common language, no common culture. There was not something that made us into an what made us into anabol. Before there were no clus even if the were yidden right but there was no clus they were individual yidden but there was no such thing. It was but even was only the beginning of like the says was the beginning of and was the end of but made us the means if there wouldn't have been a satis we'd be yidden without a we wouldn't be yidden and if another arm would have been makab thera they would be the yidden whoever is makab the toyra is the yidden we get transformed only comes because of the nothing else. He didn't have a holy land. But that doesn't make us an It's not a national homeland. How do you say homeland ines? What is a homeland? People told me is a homeland. They don't even know what they're saying. And I asked them, if it's a homeland, there should be a word. What is the word for homeland? like means the place the was born and in the Israeli declaration of independence it says in this land the Jews Jewish nation was born that's aus we were not born because we went into the land we were born on our seni where in the midbar where there was no land and there was nothing because only is a tool for us to get closer to Hashem. It's not like English that makes us into Americans, Anglo, whatever you want to call it. The kesher that one American has with another is because they speak the same language, because they have the same country, because they have the same culture. The kesher that one has to another is only because they both. That's it. nothing else. The land was given as a tool to become to be the closer to Hashem. The language was a tool to become closer to Hashem. But only Hashem is the only thing that makes us yidden. The Hashem I'm using them interchangeably. Without the there are no yidden. If you don't believe in you don't believe just like when when the Tyra came down so there was that that all sorts of midrash and what happened one of the things that happened that all these refugees from Egypt we're Egyptian refugees we're now like that transformed into yiden kalistro it was created you want to know what's the t of a yid a yid in Judaism It's not a nationality. It's not. We have nothing in common as far as nationality is concerned. We speak the same language. Me and my Yemenite that lives around the corner from me. We don't speak this now. We all speak English, but we he speaks Yemenite to different culture. His mother is where Mame looks like Yemenite from the Alahim from Yemen. We only have one thing in common. We're both in mitzvah. That's it. And if you don't believe that there was such a thing as you don't believe that there's such a thing as there's no such thing that I'm a fri that means I'm not I don't believe in kabala but I love the Jews. What Jews? What's a Jew? You don't even believe there's such a thing as kalistro. So you have a different type of what's a Jew. Maybe you think a Jew is some kind of tribe. Or maybe you think Jews are some kind of nationality. You're this is this Zionism, this nationalism. This is the realist even because and if you say that Hashem is the the original said Hashem is different. They made a new Hashem, a physical Hashem. The Christians made a new so they made a new and made a new it's the same. If you say that we're a nationality, the Jews are n anybody that believes he's a Jew that doesn't believe in kabola, that's Zionism. That's the ideology. You don't need a to be a Jew. You have a you have a language. Now I understand what the Reb is talking about. It's nationalism. Later he says later in the same over there he says again listen to the who first he nationalism. This this is the kafira of Zionism. Zionism makes statement number one, the Jews are a nationality or the Jews are an ethnicity or the Jews are a race or the Jew different have different shittas because truth is as you're going to see in a moment if you don't hold that makes you're not going to have anything that makes any sense. What nationality what national characteristics did all Jews have? Jews have nothing in common. nothing except for one thing that wanted to make. No, no, no, no, no, no. We're in We have other things in common. We have a that's our national language. Now, you see what they're they're trying to transform from a thing that was created to we have a language and we have a land. Ro is not only not the holy land is a homeland the moet the place where the nation was born that's what their declaration of independence says that's zorus we were born on hari the land does not make us into an am and the does not make us into an am that's the that zionism means listen somebody asked you what's Judaism it's not an eth it's not even a religion it's a religion but it's more than that if Somebody asked you what's a kosher piece of flesh. So you say whatever the Tory says is kosher that's the T kosher that it's a religious doctrine. The Tory make it kosher. It's the same thing. What's a Yid? What's Jews? The Torah gave a status to certain people. They said they're Jews. Mitzvah more less mitzvah. Whatever the Torah gave his status to a Yid that makes him a Jew because the Tory says he's a Jew. If you don't believe in the you don't believe there's such a thing as a Jew and if you do believe that there's such a thing as a Jew and you don't believe in the that's Zionism that's Zionism you want to know the T what Zionism is means that it's sh to be Jews without religion how so now there all sorts of different shas amongst the but one thing is not it's not that's Zionism end of story anybody that believes that he's a Jew If he believes he's a good Jew and a proud Jew and he loves you but he doesn't believe in Hashem or he doesn't believe in he doesn't believe in the that's Zionism that's all the Reb just said that's that's the type Zionism the nationalism it says nationalism in the nationalism it says there that's Zionism and all the lit they had the same time writes on nationalism is That's Zionism Buddha say he says starts off what's Zionism nationalism that's what Zionism was and it's nothing to discuss which means that any connection that people think that Jews have besides Hashem and the Tory is a Jewish country, the Jewish land, the Jewish army, the Jewish flag, the Jewish language. It's all a there's only one thing, the Jewish mitz. Nothing else is Jewish. When you say a Jewish state, what does it mean a Jewish state? A person can be Jewish. It means like the French, it's a French state. That saying that anything is the state of the Jewish people. That's our Jewish people have no state. We never will have a state. We we have a holy land and [Music] they had a but was not a national state of the Jews. This is the most important in understanding Zionism. If you understand this, you understand everything about them. If you don't understand this, you understand nothing. Now, I want to tell you something. Step two. Step two, nationalism was a philosophy. It came up about in the 1800s, which is why Zionism developed in the 1800s. And just like other philosophies, let's take communism for example, there are many different madregas of nationalism. It's like communism. If you say that I know there should be a lot of welfare and the government should regulate businesses. So that's not mish communism but it's you know it's in the direction right then there's socialism and then there's Soviet communism. It's not even the most Chinese communism. Same thing with nationalism. There are a lot of different shittas. Nationalism in the most basic thing meant that there's such a thing as a nationality. It used to be in the olden days before nationalism there was no such thing. If I was in England, I didn't look at myself as an Englishman. I looked at myself as a subject of the king, King Eggert Lamsh, right? If I was in France, the French king, and I fought a war for my king, nationalism meant, no, I'm not just king ecert subject. I'm an Englishman. I'm a Frenchman. It's part of your identity. It's part of who you are and and and the group is is it it a little stronger matre of nationalism means that if you put the group together it's greater than the sum of its parts that uh the English people but you put them together it creates we're not just a bunch of people like a corporation is a bunch of people that have a connection with each other a business relationship a country a nationality is Not just that, it's something new. It it's a a that's German. I don't think they have that in English. It means that if you have something that's bigger than different than all the all the the parts, there's such a thing. You are a part of England in the sense that the cells are only the identity of a cell is only as a kaik of a goof. My fingers are not individual fingers. They're a kick of my gof. And we're all of our country. Yeah. Then there's even a stronger matrega where the people mameish don't even have any identity except as members of their country. These are the wild crazy philosophies. People don't believe them anymore. But but Zionism took the most strongest wildest they're different madregas in nationalism. But they have the strongest wildest type of nationalism. There's Aren Aaron David Gordon a frier pixia. He said he said this that all the Jews are cells in the body and the body is the Jewish nation. And and what happens with this is that Jews don't have interests as individuals. It's only the collective that has interests. It's like my finger doesn't have any individual interests. I do. Whatever's good for me is good for my finger. If something's bad, if there's a me, right? Now, who's the mei? The mi is the am the nation. Bengurian had this shittita. He called it mio. It means that the interests of Israel, whatever is good for Israel is good for the Jews by definition because Israel is the Jews. The Jews interests are not interests of us, not even interests of the frier. Whatever is good for Israel is the interests of the Jews. That's why he said when they took the um the uh money, the reparations from the Nazis and they asked them how you take these reparations mameish it's blood money what you're taking it's forapor over here. So he said, "No, if the Holocaust victims would be around today, they would say, "Whatever's good for Israel, that's what we want. Whatever's good for Israel is by not vice is good for the Jews." That's the ta it's good for the Jews because Israel is the Jews. This is what they want. Let me tell you what else comes out because of this. If you like Israel, you can hate the Jews, but you're a good good person. You're not an anti-semite. If you like Israel, why? Because Israel is the Jews. And if you don't like Israel, then you're an anti-semite. Even if you have nothing against Jews. Why? Because the spirit of is of the Jews is Israel. Whatever. If you don't like Israel, you are an anti-semite. Not it's assim you're an anti-semite. It means you're an anti-semite because the the spirit of the Jews is Israel. Israel is and and fake also. If you like Israel, you can hate Jews. It doesn't matter. You're okay. You're a good guy. We see this man. This is the ideology. This is tianism. This is what the Reb says. This is what he says. Nationalism. Now, two things I want to tell you about that piece in Pinus. Thing number one, they reprinted it in the mad in Paris Pinus, but they changed it a little. I mean, they wrote it over. Instead of nationalism, they wrote lumius. Okay? But they left out a few words. Remember I said that those words I said there's a quote from going even though they didn't siphon it over here. So in the oil they wrote That's it. They left out those four words which are from the which is literally that's the so today it's in two places the struure it's in the in but in the mus it's better it's better and there's no tape because it was set on chabas so that's the best you're going to get this is the most important now I want to tell you something else about that If you notice the Reb said what looks like a it's got it [Music] nationalism is that's the nationalism but he said twice both times in the same Russia these extra words mish Yeah. Isn't the new nationalism this thing? What does he mean to say by that? Then he repeats it again later on when he says to stay away that it's he says what why is he doing this? What what does he mean to say? You want to see something amazing? Mameish amazing. There are two things, two parts to the rebita. And so far, by the way, this is not the rebashita. As we said, everybody says this. This is all the litak. This was their main hazmism was the ravo that they all stelled on. But this thing with what is he saying twice he says it you want to hear something amazing there's two parts to the rebashita part one the itself and part two the mitas in every sha you have to know the mitsus and you have to know the d so there's two parts to zionism too there's the mitsus which the try to conceal all the time zionism is just the right of the Jews to a homeland. The Zionism is just getting away from it's all it's not true. It's all fake. We're going to get there. We have to know the Mitsas what they really mean, what they really want. And two, then there's the this idea that he said I have in front of me a copy from a cianistic book. It was written by a guy Rubenstein, a very left-wing Zionist. He was the head of a very anti-fr party called Shinui. Um he was a leftist and he wrote a book about Zionism. Now you remember the reb calling the floor guys. Listen to this. Listen to this. This is printed I know in lesson years after the Reb said this to Russia. >> He's explaining what Zionism is. He says quote to be a was the dominant theme of Zionist philosophy in the formative period. That means what the Zionists wanted the dominating of Zionism was to be a go. The idea was so forceful, so strong that it united all the waring factions and parties because amongst the there were all sorts of disagreements. They on everything else Zionists disagreed. Territorialists, they didn't want Eritis. They wanted maybe Uganda, right? Then there were practical Zionists. Then there was labor Zionism. Then there was the right-wing Zionism. One was more fascist. One was more communist. Even the very basic idea of a Jewish state did not escape dispute and much doubt was cast on its soundness and practicality. Not not everyone wanted a Medina. They said it's going to be hard to get a Medina. If we get it, who says we can keep it? There'll be wars. We don't need a Medina. One idea, one craving, one urge enjoyed a variable, veritable consensus. One thing was according to all to be a new people to escape the role that history imposed on the Jews to become in Herzel's word a wondrous breed of Jews which will spring forth from the earth. That means what is he saying? to the smile. All of that, no matter what they hold, they disagree with each other about everything. But one thing they're mas is nationalism that Zionism means that we have to become a new people. This is mamish. Mameish. When I saw this, I saw the Reb saying before this book. I got this. I got this book. I sat. This is mish mish. What the is saying the exact same thing. This is the icker Zionism. So Ma, you site number one, Zionism. If anybody says that there's a connection between the Jewish people and anything else, the Jewish rock, this rock has uh is Jewish. It's the Jewish rock, Jewish national rock. It's avoid the Jewish country. That's a Jewish flag. Avoid Jewish army avoid desor the Jews are only have one thing and mitzvah nothing else if you think that there's any brotherhood amongst the Jews besides Tyra then that's and if you don't believe in the you cannot believe in Israel if a person doesn't believe in the Tyra but he does believe that there's such a thing as the Yiddish folk or maybe he believes in the Tory but he says there's also Yudish that's Zionism that's of Zionism now even not only the the as I mentioned Bruain Raban fought against Zionist nationalism but even the Misraistan used to know this in the writings of Msrai Mosha Vikdam Mosha Vikd his name was he was uh the Misra of Tel Aiv and he had a very mad um and the Khaz once put one once saw his somebody went and saw a book on the floor covered with a towel and the Kaz said that's Mosha's book it's don't touch it but he said this Mosha Vik that the nationalism of the is And and don't also don't think you're going to make the fryer from the from are going to make the fry are going to make you the fry are going to make you fry and it's a ael of this nationalism and and don't think that the is only totally init forget about Medina because Hashem is just he wanted they should make a medina to make a safe place for Jews and gather the mismus was willing to take Uganda because if your whole tas is just to make a safe place for Jews what's a Palestine Uganda where they went is the most dangerous place Uganda would be much better idea the fumat wanted Uganda it was Herzel that said no no no no it's bad for marketing you'll never get the Jews to jump into Zionism unless you say kaducious error they they stand there. It was a marketing thing. But but even the mistim even the mism knew this that this business and today man you know what happened it wasn't the made the national today you have these nationals they call says and rebuing too same same the same words that since nationalism lumius religious nationalism is mixed with That's all it is. And today you have them all over the place. The settlers, those crazy people, uh the the the kahanists, the the misn that they hold that no, the the land is it's it's it's from the pagans. The land has a con the physical land has a connection to you and it's your identity and and and everything the army is the Jewish army and the holy where did this you know who did this this idea of nationalism and there there were Jews even amongst the misrai that that liked nationalism it was a attractive thing but there was a one man who did a very bad thing he did the worst thing possible he not Ed nationalism he said nationalism that's Yiddish kite Rabbi Abraham Isaac Cook he was the one that not the Misrai it was him he was the one that said he took gishan nationalist philosophy mameish from the remember what I told you from Aaron David Gordon he says the same thing it's the exact same thing that you know this this this business of that that's the frier the came up with this idea there's something called the the ruo the spirit of the nation every nation has a spirit by me America has a spirit America is America has a culture but there's a ru like almost an almost like an is to a nation like we said that people are only aim the nation is the go so he took that and he said kalis is an arm like all the nations too and they also have And the of the means you're to the no the the um is connected and the is Hashem this words the um is Hashem and whoever works for the um is working for Hashem even if he doesn't know went this was mamish when the reb writes that he saw the cook's books and he saw Shrek and I don't know what he saw but I can just it could be any of these things just imagine he said that if you if you're a but you work for the another word he got from the go the nephe is higher than the nephesh of Israel who aren't. Now if you're a kyus and you're not at then your fanus like any other but if you're and you're also at then your nephesh is higher than the why because the it's the and hashem is connected to the not see we know that you have to be connected to hashem in order to be connected to the nationalism was if you're connected to the that means you're connected to hashem even if you don't know And more than that, remember we said that the Y has a a personality. Aah. So he also said that that the Y has a personality. This is from a Goyisha philosopher Hegel his name was the nations have a personality and they actually do things and history does things. We know history is just you know what happened in the past. Ms. No, no. This philosophy says history actually does things. And the players in this grand plan are not the people. They're the net nations. The people are just the fingers. And also is one of these nations that that that is doing things as a nation. And ma that's the all that is the avoid hashem. Ma if you are working for the nation that makes you connected to hashem. Listen before him was very our religion was very simple. You do mitzvah is good. You do a bad mitzvah. He turned the whole thing upside down. No, there's something called and it's all from the not he looked in the thera and even he was upon him even that he couldn't do because there was no toon that says such things like this. Nobody knows where he got this stuff from. There's a chisardi in in those days and he has a chuva on on it's called and he says look I I I don't know what's with him. Maybe him himself. Maybe he was possessed by a shade. He has crazy ideas. I don't know what's going on with the gabra but his stuff is mamish. It's where did he get? He calls him the ni because where did he get this stuff? You know if a guy is want so we know he took this was but here we're talking about it's not even it's just took the word for word the stuff put it in nice and now people think it's this because nobody knows what it is and nobody knows what it is must be kabola right it's no his own son Yehuda wrote to a big anti-semitic zionist Brener his name was that his father's two of his father's jas were based on on the uh essays of certain gvisa um goes philosophers it's all from the that's all it is that's the nationalism he's responsible not the misrai the misra is paid off they they want still want they wanted to make a medina against the we'll get there but the idea this nationalism that that faflance in not only you say it's mut This is Yiddish and Mao all the fry they loved him because this was their crazy philosophy that he did this. So they had a plan they wanted to now they had a reason they had a reason why they wanted to do this. Why did the want to do this? What do they gain by it? Well, in those days was the first days after people got freedom of religion and people got the Jews had a lot of more rights that they didn't have previously and the a lot of people wanted to be fry either because of reform assimilation whatever and they were fry and they had a problem problem was anti-semitism and they held that the reason the Goya beat the Jews is because of us just look at We don't look like Goyan. We don't think like That's why the Guyen hate us. If we would be more like the the Gyen would love us. So, first they tried assimilating. But it didn't work because in 1881 in Russia, there were a lot of pgrams and the assimilated ones were the victims of the pgrams even just as much as the as the F. So, they said, "No, no, no, no, no. We you know why? We're not goish enough." Now really when Hashem does this, Hashem is telling them assimilation is bad. Go back to the Tyra. They said assimilation is good but it's not good enough. That's why we're getting that's why we're suffering. We need to assimilate not only as individuals the whole needs to assimilate. We have to gun and make them assimilated. How do we do that? Nationalism. Let's get the Jews to think like Now, it wasn't easy. See, Jews have hashkuffs that are different than the G. Hashka number one. We're on because of the Tyra, not because of anything else. Hashka number two, we don't fight wars in golus. We do like Yakovu. We bow our heads to the G and therefore we're safe. Kalisaw survived for thousands of years. Everybody says it's a nest. And of course, it is. But it's it's only a nest because we have the instructions from Hashem. Hashem said when Jacob met Asov, right, Jacob bowed to Asov. That's the way Khalis did in Golish before they met the They hated that. They said, "What are you crazy? What are you crazy? People are going to kill you. You got to be strong. They're not going to respect you if you if you bow." Imm didn't understand. It's not even so hard to understand. You see, Hashem, Hashem said, "This is how we're going to survive." You know, if you you meet a if you're swimming in the ocean and a shark comes, so from what I see, I'm not a big expert, but you're supposed to hit the shark as hard as you can and then maybe he'll leave you alone. But if you meet a bear in the woods, you're not supposed to punch him. He's supposed to play dead and then he'll leave you alone, hopefully. It depends what type of animal you meet. You have different strategies and also there's different strategies. One to another got a whoever's stronger swords wins. But button didn't get that. And we don't win wars by swords. We win wars like grizzly bears either by the Ramban says either or prepare for the Ramban says prepare for means run away. It doesn't mean see in English let's see how it works in Yiddish. Let's see how it works in Yiddish. In English when you say uh it could mean prepare for war. This means bring your gun or it can mean prepare for a war. That means bring your passport because the word could be translated too. Either for war, start war or there's a war coming, run away. The Ramban says that's what it means. Run away. It's very simple. And and and then then we win. And even when we fought wars, you know the story. I I I don't even have time to say it, but I'm going to anyway because it's so important about when Klis's wars there's a story with Briska B said it over uh was then it was it was the days of the mascul and the mascul made a play to make from the the from they always did this and the play was and the mash came there and he said okay we're making we're making who wants to come to the m and I don't know thousands of people came he says but whoever got married let's go home people go home whoever built a house go home whoever is scared of war go home whoever go home someh only two people are left and risk and they're there and that was the end of the sto play and it was and they were laughing and they went they ran to and saidim we have to answer what do we say so said let me see the script so he looked at it and he said oh when he said go home the the people built houses very good this is true this is good you know what everything here is good it's right except for one thing they left out we won the war. That's how Kali won wars. No, they didn't have stronger armies. It was all that's all it was. We won with nothing else hated that noadus. Nowad we know the says everybody knows this that there's no such thing as when it comes to soul as a whole. An individual is is uh um Butalis as a whole only works with they get what they deserve. No mazalis as a whole. They hated that hated another thing. They hated the fact that by us faim they're not part of if we're brothers we're a nation of course we're part of kalisro. The goals of the tion were to knock out these hashkuffus. Knock them out of kaliso. Make kaliso normal. Normal like goyan, like anti-semmites, be normal. Jews didn't want a country. Napoleon offered the Jews in Medina. Jews could have had countries all over the place. Even near Buffalo, there was a place there was a Rabbi Noah that wanted to make uh uh Medina around I St. Lawrence River. I think it was near Buffalo. And they said no there you can't make a Medina even outside of but they hated this. What do you mean you don't want to be independent? You want to be always under the go. You're not normal. They looked at us not normal. They wanted to rise out of the Jewish people. How do you do it? I'll tell you how. Here's their plan. Brisk said he said they don't want a in order to make a Medina. They need to make a Medina in order to yiden. The Medina was not the end goal of Zionism. The end goal of Zionism was that the Yidden should tear out those hashkuffus and change their ideas. Here's what we're going to do. We're going to make the Jews think like a regular nation. We're going to give them a country. We're going to give them an army. It's going to be their army. All the Jews will think it's their army. All the Jews will look at the country as their country. We're going to give them a language. They're all going to look at the common language. And when the Jews have all of this, they'll start looking at themselves psychologically as a nation, a political nation. And what's going to be? Well, right now, we are a religion. Religions have goals. Toyota mitzvah. Nations also have goals. win gold medals, Nobel prizes, have a nice uh national anthem, win song contests, Olympics, strong army. And and that's what's going to happen to Kalistro. When we give these equipment, national equipment to the Jews, they'll start maybe one year, 10 years, 100 years, the Jews will start looking at themselves like a goish nation. And when Israel wins an Olympic gold medal, the Yidden in New York will be proud. Oh, Yidden. Now we can win gold medals because you connected the Jews to some country over there. The the uh the Jews when Israel wins a Nobel Prize, the Jews will brag. Israel won a Nobel Prize. Israel has a Mossad. Israel is strong. All these things. Well, what's I'm an American? What do I have to do with some stupid country in the Middle East? The terret says, "No, you're one arm. They're your country. It's your nation. It's your this." That's the avoid desor of Zionism. That's what they wanted. That was the goal of Zionism. Now, until now, we've been speaking only about Zionism. Let's talk about Zionists. There's a mba in 1955 in Montreal. He went to Montreal to to um for medish the chief rabbi of Montreal then was daring and he wanted to dash in something in honor of Sakma. So here's what he said. He said in days of the was regarding the tail says the polish wanted to be together with the bad Jews to make them better and the Hungarians wanted to separate with them and it was misus between the gdm and this was the misus in the between Abra and Sorum whether to throw about and Abram held like the gdm of Poland and litter let's keep him we'll make him better and Sorah held like the gelim of Hungary and Hashem Pasin like the of Hungary and that was his the Reb got up he interrupted him and he says there was no such and then he motioned for him to continue and he sat down then the Reb went over to him and said first of all you got your history warned. It was the days of the not the second of all when did the Jews say not to to to separate from the in the days of in the days of the sukim there is no such a thing. Now you should know if you take a look in the safer onish parlar has a like this um and had a kiss what to do with wanted to keep him because he held that he he's going to be in Amoritz he'll take care of like the gash is for for yak back of au his brother will be mar of him and and he'll have his his place in kalis rifka held no we got to throw him out the bos like rifka throw him out this is baron caut so clearly the rabbi was wrong about the literatur but I want to tell you a secret that no suffic in my mind that this is the story the backstory behind a certain piece in the dri You read this piece without knowing this story. This piece I think was said 1959, but you read this piece without knowing the story. You're not going to understand what the Reb is talking. Here's what he says. Russia, Poland. [Music] That's mish the whole thing including the last part that he told that chief that chief rabbi in the stories this is mish this is mish what he's referring to the idea one of the things the zionists wanted was to make sure that kim and considered equal members of the Jewish people because if you're a Greek and you don't believe in the avoidor Zeus you're less of a Greek. You're a Greek. You just don't believe in the religion. So the Jews have a religion and you don't believe in it, but you're an equal Jew because the Jew is a nationality. And they said one of the main goals of Zionism is that Kim and Aarim should be considered part of Kalis. Even the the Reb all over the place, Zionists, no, they're not part of Kalistro. And this was not his shittita yet either. We didn't even come close to his shittita. the because the said this boy said anybody should think that we say differently not only is not part of he's not even called zeriah he's not even called the also brings that from the boys and the but he's not even zer everybody agrees to this not theistan now we're getting a little theistan had a different sheet but the agistan They agree with this too. There was no mahus at all between the Reb and these other regarding Zionists and Zionism. Zionism is the nationalism. Zionists are not part of there's nothing to discuss. Nobody nobody I'm not talking. They're they're already out at this point. But from the Haga, nobody disagreed with this. Now, let us talk about Medina. Here's where things get interesting. The Zionists wanted to make a Medina in order to help the because if the Jews have a Medina, they'll start thinking that's the Jewish Medina. And it's going to be very, very good for the because um the Jews will support it. They'll look at it like their country. Anybody who's against it will be accused of being an anti-semite will be accused of being an anti-semite. Jews will support it from all over. Jews will they'll be able to influence other countries, say America, they'll be able to um twist the arms of politicians to do what Israel wants, not what America wants. Because the Jews are part of what do you mean? We're the Jewish nation. We're not Americans. We're Americans technically, but we're Jews. That's the you understand this is terrible is blum. And I want to tell you that Adolf Hitler in his book m chapter 2 when he says that Jews are not really Germans, they're another nation. He says, I'll prove it to you. Just ask the Zionists. He says, I see them. They dress differently. They this. So they look like another people, not Germans. But if you have any suffic there's a movement among them Zionists it's called and they say the Jews are a nationality and they're a nation and even the ones that aren't Zionist are not MOA they didn't kick them out of Kalis so they're ma that there's a Jewish idea of being their own nation and not Germans if they're not Germans what are they doing here kick them out kick them out are the Jews part and there was no Medina there then today where the go say the Jews carrying around Israeli flags in in the base medish they they celebrate yhat are more than the 4th of July and and and a guy like Jonathan Pard the spy when they asked him why he spied he said racial imperative meaning what do you mean I'm aid and his wife said we have no because we did the right thing as Zionists and Jews we have to mean Israel's our country susp So Hitler didn't even have a Medina that went around saying that they that they're the Jewish state, but there's such a thing as Zionism. This is what the Zionists want. But there's a problem with a Medina even without it's a it's a violation of the Sakas of the Schol. Those anybody who doesn't know made we're in this means we're to be all over the world says that the mitzvah that you're not allowed to live in doesn't apply in gol because the sagol says Jews have to live all over the world means even in mit that's a big fish you could have a golos even if the Jews aren't init because of the schol to go to that's the in there's no mit of yeshiva uh but that's about an individual but kalis together says the gammorra there's a gammorra repra uh didn't want to go to and the Gmorrah asks why didn't he want to go and it says because of the and then it says no he holds is only a collective that the Jews shouldn't come a big and mass to go to number two they're not allowed to rebel against nations invad brings the second to the shist and says if the Jews let's say in New York want to make a revolution we want to make self determination and and make New York ours you're not allowed and the third one I don't have time to explain the Reb says in Rashi but you look at Moshi you'll see it and obviously this these ass are making him Medina. Now this also was not the can somebody tell me someone who was on this not talk about. So let me tell you something this is a big lit he says he speaks a lot about the he says first of all this is why the holocaust world war II came was the when the were in England um they made revolutions to get a medina and there was the bolsheviks all of these baram he said they call this is a garra says the punishment the rebb says that's the worst means there's going to be a holocaust simp simply like that the rebb says also the holocaust came because of the the said the same thing heard it from him and there are other places too heard it from him this if you look at the holocaust and you look in the you look you see what matches it. There's only one thing in the that matches it what it was and it's no coincidence that this is mish what they were over but he says that they were says that held that the naya because I'll give you his reason shortly but he says didn't hold like that they held the on the by making finish end of story when he says right I know any either. I think he's saying because you know like the Reb says also um that you always say because you never know 100% you know it's called but I don't know anybody that that said differently the there's a shita there's the abna that says that um if it's the um going up to stroll is done peacefully so then you're not like the Reb says never said you're allowed to make a state that would be the and two this is very important this was not where they say the United Nations gave the the first of all see usually when when bad when people make a bad Tina or a Tina and bad faith, there's usually going to be two problems with it. One, it's not true. And two, even if it is true, it it's not anyway. So, both of those things are are are true over here. Number one, it's not true. The United Nations doesn't give anybody any land. You can't give somebody something unless you own it. The United Nations doesn't give anybody anything. They did not give them. There was a vote in the general assembly. Um uh and it was recommended that they should uh have a uh uh give it to the the TI. It did not even go to the security council which was supposed to. So it's not even official. It was only recommendation. They don't give anything. But more importantly, let's say that let's say the United Nations wanted to, you know, we learned in yeshiva in the when says it's when he says it's more when he says it's even more. And if you think if you understand the that's and you think it's you don't fully understand the and the is to say if it's and if it's in that spirit I have to say that this thing from the is stupid. I mean it's stupid. What the Arabs? What's the difference if China or Bulgaria says we votes that that the Jews should get a Medina? It says they can't do it. If the Arabs don't want the Arabs are going to fight, you have to fight to get in there. What's the difference? If China says you can go in, it was still and the Reb says this. And it's not just the Reb who says this. I want to read you something. Everybody knows that before the Medina was around the Aguda, the Raon and the Aguda had a vote about should they what should they do about a Medina and um the the bigger ones said you're not allowed to make a Medina even if it's from because it's Mashiach. There are others that said that you can and Jakob Rosenheim he was one of the big in the Auda then he wrote a letter that said that we know that the only meant that you can do it if the Arabs are mo if the Arabs are not musk then you're on the And Shui in a book that Rosenheim wrote regarding the aguda concerning a policy on Eritis he says the following. He says the na the allied nations especially England and United States will not be able to sherk their duty to force both Jews and Arabs to meet at a at a roundt conference in order to come up with an exact constitutional form which will be favorable to both nations meaning their the nations the go the US England their to make a zitong for by the Jews and the Arabs and everybody should be Muskim Because if not in deference to the solemn oath imposed upon the Jewish people of Ab by our Talmud for the entire period of Golis and also because of the realistic political considerations. We firmly reject any reference to milit military power in relations between Jews and Arabs. If there has to be fights between Jews and Arabs, it's against the schol and we are not Muskim. Only if the Arabs are masking even they were masked that that the the the creation in the Medina was against the shush and is subject to that terrible punishment. Now why don't people talk about it? There's a problem. reproven gravski writes in voyman ah we don't want to talk about the scholash because people won't be mabo better we should talk about people want to think that the medina is a yeshua whatever so better speak about how the yeah there were those blazer Gordon tells a rub 1904 wrote a cha about how the uh medina is going to be against the schol and he says also he says even if the eating don't want to understand the that said at least let them understand what a Russia herzel is and what malinus said against the Jews repu and Gordon everybody said that you can't talk about this so so they didn't talk much now we have a big problem they're ready to make a medina medina it's against the it's the biggest oish in the Tyra It's the gulb brings in the hak. I don't know anybody that disagrees with this amongst [Applause] even recently David Salvikov's son said the reason why people in Israel get killed so much neb and nobody cares. He said nobody cares people in Israel get killed tomorrow's another day. It's it's normal. He says when there was that terrible terrorist attack in the harsh he said it's for the everybody knows about this but if nobody wants to talk about and nobody wants to be m we are in big trouble came a man raesb and he said listen nobody wants to talk about this. I know. In fact, it's worse than that. The Shalashmus are a are a are in a worse position than just nobody wants to hear. Nobody learns them. It's not anybody's fault. As he brings in the haktoma, it was never kimad a thousand years gaps. It's not neg things that are not people don't learn the gum but ali even somebody that has noi come to him if he doesn't learn something because it's not lisa he's not going to know it and if it's not lisa we don't learn it he brings three rise from from the the malakor and from chuva that that if the things that are not nega people don't learn and it's not nega worse than that worse than that that nobody learned the there is no where is the is there is a but it's much more than just that it's not things in Russian all sorts of things and nobody put together anything so you don't really have a of the it's something that was never wasn't learned like in in in a thousand years came out nothing and nobody knows much about it and nobody even wants to hear. So he said, "You don't know what you had." So he comes to Satb and says, "I have a friend in Satma Vulkat. He used to be a rebi in yeshiva in Manhattan yeshiva and ramen zach who was the was the rebian myk but the didn't give he had a was my mir who's a member of the vulk gave the veh to mend a zach to see The mendlezac said came back same he said the same thing everybody else said in different words he said it's not he knows he said in Yiddisha it means he said that if you have a guy who goes into a grocery store so he wants to know where the soup is so he could find the soup he asks where's the soup makes looks on the signs where then there's a guy who comes in with his eyes closed he knows already the soup is here this is here at on his fingertips where he knew where everything is. You're talking about mashim fromasha from Yeshakasha. So something from the cash he had it on his fingertips and he said you know what I don't care what people want to hear and he said one day people are going to want to hear he says one day I'm telling you could very well be even though people don't want to hear now one day maybe people will want to hear between me and you I tell you from experience from 40 years ago to today people want to hear much more today because Israel in the 50s and the 60s everybody loved it. They didn't have any misnagom amongst the except the Arabs. Nobody was against them. After 1967 when the whole thing with the territory started 1977 when the militants manag and his got into office then people started hating Israel. But before that in the 50s everybody loved Israel. Now people are more yeden also. I know Ayid personally Abal Chuva was at Kohl's he wasn't from he wanted nothing to do with Yiddish kite because he associated Yiddish kite with Israel and nobody likes Israel and then when he found out that there are ye in New York that protest against Israel that against Zionism he said maybe I should find out about Yiddish kite and today he's learning in Kyo he's a younger man learning in Kyo and it's not only him there are plenty like that it's the worst thing for the Jew reputation of the Jews is Israel Bisman Haz and he said I'm going to do it and there are three times in history such a thing was done as far as I know somebody could find the fourth I'll be mak where somebody took a suga that didn't exist because it was spread throughout keroul and he put it together number one the ramban writes a letter to the rabbon of France praising the ramb and one of the things he says the rambom did a great thing. He made such a thing built as chuva. Before the Rambam, everybody knew there was such a thing as chuva. But where would you find the halas? Is there a barrack and shas that has chuva? Is there a raam went to and he made hilus? And the ram praises him for that. The second time did hilkah. Everybody knew there was such a thing as lush. But if you wanted to learn hilkash, where would you go? did it. The third time was when the Reb made the the it wasn't only and lash. The difference is though that was so people did learn it. The wasa so people did learn it and if a person wants to know the shash he has to come on to the rabbel. So the raarashi of Israel the has a sh about giving away the are you allowed to give away the say you're allowed to give away the to make peace of course as I the says there's a man to conquer he says it's not true because of the rabb of the ramban says even in the ram there's no such saying nobody holds up as a mid of contra. So because of he says so there's a chief rabbi then he says but in that only gay a thousand years well what's he going to do now it's a thing now it's not there's no chis to quote so he says go look and you'll see that doesn't mean that there's no other there's no other address to go the reb took from everywhere and he made a sa that didn't exist. Now so far as you can see the shoo also wasn't the rabbis and this is a big problem because people think that it it's and it was part of it was done purposely only the sat only sat from the shash a lot of this was done by a his name was man kasher who wrote a he was he was at He was uh and in there in his book. So there a lot of terrible things. He has he has like statements from Rabon that um uh that they signed on a certain date that the Medala. The problem is a lot of the Raanim never heard of this this settle that they signed. One of them was even dead. Vishas when he was supposed to have signed. What happened was he sent a letter to all these people said if you don't if he's not Mo I'll put your name on the Kur and this guy wasn't Mo because he was dead so he couldn't be Mo and not only that but he changed the lotion of the Kulkar he never even said to the when he sent it out he was a big zip ground I want to tell you that I saw he wrote a also a big uh encyclopedia on the Reb had it I saw it in 500 Bedford Avenue on the second floor in the and he got it not the whole set volume by volume because the old volumes were older and then they got newer and newer and in the old volumes it said by mendel kasha of shina then later he dropped mendle he became more Israeli so he's just kasha and then he started spelling kasha so you see like you know as he became a first volume say it was a and at the end you see how he he became and I heard from somebody that the Reb said that the Pakus is nice. He was a big bucky, but the perish is dry. But this guy, this this kasha who I heard the briskov would not even look at he was responsible that he said everybody even the holds the the it's only not that way. He was a Gosid and a lot of this was done specifically you know it's like it's like saying that only the holds you're not allowed to speak lion somebody today asked me why is it that from all the was the one that screamed about can seem okay it's a fair question Rab Va Miller answers he says because he had more courage everybody else is scared but I would question the questioner Nobody asks why the was the only one that seemed about Nobody would say well no nobody holds from only the nobody else every god will have their thing but they they they want to make believe that that only help is also because of the not only is it also but it's even also to exist because of the schol I know that people say Bashame the stipler that the stipler said in his kayon the garta that it was also to make the medina because of the he's talking about voting we'll get there shortly but to have the medina is not against the shash said that and I saw an article in makit called premorum I don't know if they still have it no years gone okay many years like 30 years ago I remember prior had a white and green cover where somebody in Saturn wrote a whole article and he understood the stiper saying this too. It's not what the stiple says. The stiper is talking about voting and the stiper says that is but when I vote I'm not voting whether I vote for this candidate or that candidate. The Medina still exists. So it's not the but the disciple would be that if you could get rid of the Medina because of too how to do it I don't know and a lot of things I don't know how to done how to bring Msiah if I could bring Mashia I'd be mu too if I get rid of the Medina I'd probably bring Msiah also I just don't know how okay but if you could you should and just to prove a point I wrote a letter to Pan Kfski and I said your father wrote this and this and this is what people Say this is another shot. Which shot is right? He says it's that was the second shot that I said the stipler everybody holds that the medina if it was made against the sh it is also to exist of because of the nothing to discuss. It's still not the I'll tell you what the reb doing in mo though the first part of mo is discussing the shed. Put that off the clock. Take this right. And he discusses about how it's also to make a medina because of the choice. What he did was [Applause] so now we're talking about Medina. We're not talking about we're not talking about Israel. We're talking even if would make a medina even the most would make a medina it would be against the hagus and like the worst in the worst how do I know the is the says that it's still a big so you see there's a connection between the and the you see in a lot of places so first he says it's what the rebb did was he took took all the disjointed places over here the shu a little there where's naya and what he did was he put it together like a puzzle and he made it all fit in so smoothly and perfectly he made it all all make sense there's mysteries there the maral says vyo um houses um the rashi that says The said it means a guy once came to the and said I only follow for the ghoul and nothing else. The Reb said that you're not allowed to do that. But what the Reb did was he took all the suki that nobody learned because it wasn't and that nobody wanted to hear about and that is nigashimada all over the place and image put it together like a puzzle. It's not he was malaki he answered cautious put pieces together that with these pieces all the dots are connected and everything makes sense. And here's what he to the moral says it's from and various different places that the in of the shus are not just shuis. What he did like this, there's the shu. He put the shu on the bottom. The shu. What he accomplished was that he said that the shu are an Indian of meaning that not only if you believe things could be if you do things could also be clear. and brings from the Radas and Pkim if you do something you doing things to be or even if you believe not what you're doing and he brings ras not for now everybody to see that it's now that put together all the pieces of the puzzle why it's Yav why Rashi says again that's an look it up it's I think it's it's the most piece of the whole first he put together a and it only works if it's I have to tell you I'm sorry I I can't the mash that you can't make a on something that's already unless you find one that's not and then the shoe is on and everything. It's not a gar like that from the gar. So when how could you have a if it's so you have to find one little that meaning getting out of g before the time is not how where you going to find that I got it like the there's a certain type of that's to happen what if you're in camp you're asking hashem and because of that the gula comes says he means that type of and once you have that type of now the can be on everything that's so everything fits in now it's but now that's step two and I don't know anybody who would want to be on that either face anybody would be on this step three is where the reba comes in until Now everything we said was not the reb this was like everybody's in agreement most everybody if you find somebody that wasn't this one was the rub here is what he did was until here nobody has a problem have a problem have a problem has a problem they have a lot of problems No problem. Then what he said was because of this anybody that has aatus in this matina is the in the if it was missionaries he says this it was missionaries would anybody join the missionaries it's an act of so you're not allowed to be in the kessus and you're not allowed to vote and I don't know honestly when he talks about the voting he he speaks about there are different of voting versus being in the kinesis itself voting is naiva bringing in the kinesis it may be I'm not sure about this I think so that he's saying this because in a democracy where you have votes the government is not just the people sitting in the chairs in power the voters are also part of the government they're part of they can we can tell the president what to We can vote him in, we can vote him out. In any case, whether I'm right or wrong with this theory, the voters are necessary to make the government. Without a certain amount of voters, you can't. And without the government, without certain amount of Knesset people, you can't have the laws. So first of all, anybody who's involved with the voting or the the kesset is now on this cuz your is your it's you did an act of an act of being involved with the you it's like a you're you're in the here comes the and right here is the reput The agodistimist disagreed here repu and the stipless say and now this is important. You know what happened over here? What happened over here was a very bad thing. There's a story I don't know if it's true where the went to kyois gritski and he asked him to sign and settle that said speaking hor is like eating kaz. So Kai said reportedly allegedly supposedly that you think that if I sign is settled it means people will stop speaking lash no it means people would start eating kaza okay now that doesn't mean that speaking lash is not like eating kaza it's just people are not always smart and they're not always good and this is what's going to happen what happened was a very bad thing because the sarba tied these things together. Anybody that disagreed with this little detail, they said no, they disagree with the whole thing. So the the the Broski and the disciple both have a defense why the is we'll get there in a minute why the Reb doesn't hold on from it. But so the say well no you see the is that mean Zionism is M. They held differently from Zionism. No, no, no, no. This they agree this they agree. This idea is where they disagree. Says very simple. He says nobody should think that the has any less hostility any less than that. So that's what he's talking about with David. He says no when Jacob went to he was making now everybody can do but you can't do at the same time right [Music] you can do by both so now which one are you going to pick well which would make which would work at the time you shut up you say psychologically is he going to take him out you give him if not you make says the only we have is that we hold is a better strategy. They hold mu is a better strategy they should say so okay said this over said I heard from many times that I have no about the medina everything he knows about the medina I hold except one thing hold if you don't vote if you don't be part of the government what are you going to you have to fight the so that's what we have to do reproving rivski is mo is mo that this is the default normal shittita. He feels that he has to defend himself. People think that no sat has to defend himself. Why? By every shittita, every maflo it's not every but many times there's a glatita and then there's a shittita. So who's the glatita and the so people think because of the propaganda that sat the and the glatita zven is not true. It's mish it's mish not true. He says he's first of all being in the in Israel you're being remember we had the not Zionism the Zionists you're being you're being with them you're you're you're being with them what's the for that and he says we are the ones that need a explanation says the explanation is number one you're right it's But the in our camp assessed that's like we're forced to do it. It's an it is also to think that it's anus with the Medina. That's he says it's also to think that it's a mitzvah. It's a good thing that we're in the No, you got to go and holding your nose because it's like like we have to do it like a shade. We have to understand that it's a terrible thing that because of our aus we were forced into this matzah but what are we going to do there as the said there was no there was never any for them to go into the kessa to get money for yeshivas or to get um assets for their communities it was only for one one then what are we going to do with the schma when they come make a vote to make the guillos of the the the n who's how are you going to fight them. You have to vote them out. He says if the communists the communists would have a government, you'd also put people in the communist government. Does that mean you masking to the communists or that the communist government should exist? Or as the Kazunish said, the Kazunish said, "Look, if a mugger comes to me and and and he says, "Give me your wallet." And I say, "All right, look, I'll give you my wallet. I'll give you my money, but let me have my car keys. Let me have the pictures of my kids." Right? Do I negotiate? Does that mean I'm asking I'm in his robbery? It's an a quote. Now, by the way, the Reb addresses this and I want to be mad in a lot of times Rebus like I did here. I was wondering, you know, maybe he shouldn't have been stupid about, but the Reb says did in he says like the the um no made a um uh he brought things from the Christians and uh in order to show that they don't make any sense to and he writes and this and that when he speaks about the he says he doesn't say he doesn't say this that's what he's talking about he says first of all well let me finish first with but says it's not enough he says the belt are dumb kadas and they're going to look at us and they're going to m zism because we're in the kess and they're going to say look they're not such against zionism like Sakma we have to deal with that. So says Abu we're only allowed to do this alinas. Number one we never ever allow anybody to think not only we shouldn't think nobody should think that we have any with nobody should think that we're Zionism the Medina is not Zionism is two different things. Nobody should think that we changed our because there's a Medina. Nobody should think we are to be more than even like when we speak about the because we have to make sure everybody understands that we're against them and we're just as against them against them without these forget it plus the people who are in the to be there so they have to be big right so says he says listen there's number one First of all, none of none of this works because you're still with none of this is a but two it's not going to work. he brings from the state uh and also about the machine masses that whenever you have a heter that's totally on conditions on controls at the end the controls are going to be forgotten and the heter is going to remain so what's going to happen is basically that the is going to remain you could be in the kesset and you're not going to have the the conditions you're not going be screaming against the says the newspaper has to say has to always shel the you're not going to shout them you're not going to this because there's a for this nationalism that you're go it's not it's not going to work it's not going to work and today didn't work there's a m one of the auda that came to the rabb to invite him to either meeting of the aguda or a convention herz frankle has one musf I heard from both kats a little different mus But they invited him to some audi said I don't want to come. Why don't I want to come? He says cuz with what the aguda became if I go there I'll be the only audist. Everybody else will be miser. And the prriskarov said the prriskarov said that they became they became all of these all of these and by the way by the way listen to this one of the tinas there ever has is that they has a whole bunch of tinas on the echod and they signed the declaration of independence which has all sorts of fear in it. First of all, they freedom of religion. Uh they're going to make freedom of religion which is against the they said that our nation was born here. All sorts of things. So now listen says no one's allowed to pay. But Lavine got up in the Knesset and said that you we have to keep the Tyra all this kind of things. Benagurian more than once responded no you guys signed the declaration of independence there it says this is not a medina of this is a secular medina [Music] everybody from the communists to the agodistan signed all of you signed what are you talking now and there was no response that well we're only here to fight the whole they're there to fight only the schma there's no heter to go get money. There's no blal unless they're fighting. There's no if they're not mak the tanoyan and gurian said it more than once. And how many people bisman say that since the audet must be they change their sheet about zionism said they're not allowed to let people think that if they let them think that it's this it's like being mo that was the told that he's worried not about the two in the mation the shar have two different stories says will make us stronger and said I'm not I'm not scared what I am worried about is that the Jews will start liking the medina even those that went into the medina and the government to to fight they went in holding their nose and then he says also that it's He says we have to have good reassess every time. It's a strategy. So maybe tomorrow today is the strategy. Maybe tomorrow will be the strategy. And then we have to garden even more than the karta. And by the way, that's what they're doing today by the they had a big minds and quoted this piece from Rubin that I just said and it says Rubin says that one day we may have to go out and see this is the time they they claim to be old audit and everybody says that they're the big I want to before I I'm going to Did I leave anything out? Is there something that I I should mention that I didn't mention? Well, there there there's more, but I I don't have time for the rest of it because there's part of the Reb maintained it. There were a lot of not a lot some I don't want to say any names but if you go down the olive phase you skip olive you'll get there very quick that used to be and now they're real real Zionists so something happened over there no the rebba implemented controls to make sure that doesn't happen from a ra and from a a this ser that ser and he brings this all also everything that he did that he survived to the extent that Sat was surviving is only because of of of of his uh understanding of the tiger. Now one more thing I want to say. I know that even though despite everything I said over here, people will still wonder how could we be sure about that the uh all these some so many people you know is so at the end of the first night he says but so I want to tell you something I want to demonstrate something there are two things number If a person tsy and he learns it. So what comes out is this let you know we're not to answer every kasha and every person in the world or every even go I'll give you a motion. Let's say I was giving a sh and I said right and somebody will come to memor and a guy's going to come to me and say no this 4:00 in the afternoon so what am I going to say I say you know what you have to ask him the kash it's not fair he's go ask him I don't know am I to answer that kasha I'm not you have a kite on you got to know where the kite is. Listen, if a if a guy's 100 gor is ais so if a guy knows how to learn, he knows he has a sheris. If a guy doesn't know how to learn, he thinks he doesn't have a sheris. He has 100. That's not so that after a person understands enough about this. So fine, there are the shittas. They're shittas. I'm to answer everybody's there's a that's it. But if a guy doesn't learn the Mishna and he doesn't learn the Torah, he doesn't learn the the he's not going to understand the difference between somebody who's mocked it on Daven or somebody who dins 4:00 in the afternoon chakras. He's going to think there's two sheetas and and I don't know if right people ding 4:00 in the afternoon. It's a no no no. That's not the way it works. But there's you have to understand you got to come to a place where you understand what's and what's I'm not saying there's no answer. I'm saying to give an answer. Now there's another thing and I want to demonstrate something. You know sometimes shilas come up and then I'm going to take questions. Sometimes sh come up and they about other religions from India or somebody has to go into a church to do voting or weight watchers program and you got to know the m them see another religion it happens so on Christianity the rebba has a chuva in past like the shame there's difference between different types of Christians but what what what what do I So you got to find out about another religion. So you open a book. How do you know books reliable? So I have a a trick that I do. I look in the section of the book about Yiddish kite and I see if it makes sense, if it's good. It's not a but it gives some credibility to the rest because that's something I know about. So if somebody says to themselves, you know what, Rabbi Shapiro, you made this whole Russia, I don't know what kafir is. I don't know what are. It's the time between is the shashu. I don't know from I don't know from from I don't know from anything. I only know what I know. This Reb says this, this Reb says that. So, let's go to an area where we can all know something. You don't need to know any title. Let's go to Israel's six- day war in 1967. So, Israel won the war. There are people raon that insists that Israel's victory was a neess that they had no chance. Now, First of all, every military expert and intelligence agency in the world predicted that Israel would win the war because they had the stronger side. If the Arabs would have won, maybe it would have been an S. But even if Israel was weaker, it wouldn't be an S because weaker sides sometimes win like the prim. But they had they were a stronger side. the the the Reb said I heard this from both cats too. He heard this from the Reb because President Johnson when Abi the Israeli ambassador came to President Johnson said they're going to wipe us in throw us into the sea. So he said to him, "Look, all our intelligence agencies say that you're going to whip them." And I'm saying that for Nikia and the CIA before the war said there may be a war and even if he just attacks first it'll take a few days maybe a week maybe a little more and it will wipe them all out all of the Arab armies. All of them because the Arab armies stand no chance. Everybody knew and the Reb writes in he says everybody knew the everybody knew Israel was going to win. I heard from both cuts he said if the war was a mess Johnson was another H if every scientist says look the nest this is what's going to happen and it happens that's not an S on Qurin everybody thought it wouldn't happen the Yeshua only Morai knew but everybody here everybody thought it would happen and everybody knows this and even people people who you tell them this sadic made a mist they'll say hey you believe these crazy stories but the sixth day war is a mess There's one person there was that said, "No, you're crazy. It's not a nest. It's the only mice of something there is that people think it's a it's it's a nest." The made up of bill that the Reb said it was a nest from the he never said that. He said it wasn't a nest. Six places approximately says it wasn't a nest that Satan does make in many places, but this was not one of them. And this was ava. Now you go to people people would say and they'll still say it was an how do you know it was an S? Well, this robe said it was an S. The only way to know if it was a nest or not is to assess the capabilities of both armies and decide that the military capabilities of the Arabs was much more than Israel and that Israel did something that they couldn't do. Which ro is going to say that he's capable of doing that? If you ask these if a if a dishwasher is a clichi or cliche, they'll say, "Oh, I got to know how it works. every little pro, you know, detail. But over here, no, it was an S. Everybody knew it was an S. What do you mean? Everybody knew. You This one man got up and said, "What are you crazy? It wasn't an S." Every scientist, every expert, every historian, everybody knows it wasn't. They knew Israel was going to win. Here is an example of the pupil hamus that takes place. And I want to tell you something, my book that I wrote. So I wrote all sorts of bad things about sanism medina. You know what bothers them the most? It's unbelievable the fact that I wrote the six day war wasn't an S and I quoted the the generals said it wasn't an S. One of the sons a son of one of the generals in the sixth day war read my book and he contacted me and I asked him if he heard anything from his father more by way his father I quoted his father. That's what father was interviewed for magazine after the war and he said this thing we were never even in Sakona. It was a bluff was bluff we wanted people to get scared and people were scared. So they told everybody it's a sakona and we wanted America to give us uh green lights to attack but I said did your did your father did you hear anything else from your father that we don't know? He said yeah. It says Egypt says everybody in the no knew that Egypt was ne would not be ready to fight anybody in a war for 18 months maybe two years. Now here's the question. Ask people ask them why do you say this war was a nest? Why? Why? Well, everybody said it was. No, no, no. That's not a reason, right? They will not have a reason. It's against everything. that that everybody knows and yet they insist with a mishesh know it was a nest if anybody can explain to me this except that some mice are s and here you have something that you don't need to be a big London to know and one man sata got up and said it's not an because simple he he he didn't say because of uh well he did have riots from sukim about the Arabs being bad fighters but he says the is all the everybody knew Israel would win. It's very simple. Here you have an example and that's easy. You don't got to be alarmed for that. And what happened? So clearly clearly it's no caution. See that's look at that. That's something that everybody here can understand. You know, look at newspaper, look it up. It's it's push and people with it kas. No, it was a nest. It was a nest. It was an S. Why would somebody think it's a nest? Why? Because everybody said, so the said nobody will ever figure out an explanation for this war. They wrote that in a newspaper in that in that z the two. He says, "Oh, this was a big nest like they came and made the whole thing is bubbers." Misha misers. Now these are the people on the in these people that say six day war was an second thing by the way that they can't stand. There's a story my I said was so I wrote him a story about my uh what he saw what said about Rabbi Cook uh had a table my was there with his father came to visit him in Iraq and he saw in a newspaper Polish newspaper I heard this from my share my schwagers heard this from my share my wife heard this for my after my was by the time he went to the briskov he said over this story of used to say this over in my it's in the Mishko shame my and repar he didn't know who got it from who rebel got it from my saw a speech that cook gave in a newspaper Polish newspaper about the soccer players kish hashem that he finally have soccer players. It was terrible. He clipped out the clipping and he put it on the table and picked it up and he started shaking uncontrollably. I said, that's ball in Polish cook. And he threw it down. other stories like that also but they can't be so it after the six day war this is the next thing they can't be so you see the sahara working you mish see it but this was the reb this little thing this little this was the that because the Indian of therefore the is an Indian of of 2 and therefore it's also to be from the they say no it's not the slightly said the said no that it's a way of fighting them. It's a way of not that's it. That little pro this is and you know why he wrote the emphasis and not on the other things you saw nationalism we had all the other places because everybody knew about the other stuff. Everybody knew the mist knew that nationalism was avoid every lit said it every litak said zionism is avoid and and and they're not part of there was no need for the reb to write anything here. knew there was a big need because the Reb held like this first of all the but then regarding the nobody knew there was no such safer so he did something that was necessary but it's not a safer onism and it's not even a safer on it's but it's a safer about making a medina and he needed it because of the went into the government and because of the yaga said that it's a mitzvah to vote And because the ag said it's a mitzvah to be in the to fight the kim and he needed because the was to everything else what did he need to write now lia what happened was was that the becomes the whole fight against the is only the and it's all this whole thing from beginning to end is only sat and because they ended up in the the knesset the the agura so Everybody holds like Bengurian that that shows that they're that they are uh not against the anymore. And there's a whole it's all fake news from the press and propaganda going on 100 years. But this this over here this is the rabbis. This is the Reb's This is the Reb's Tigra on the his heads on the shoo. This is something that everybody knew more or less.