Semuchim M'yad - Connecting Parshas Korach With the End of Shelach

Okay, good morning friends of Shabas. We're uh we have amazing shum this morning on par and other important topics. Here we go. The first uh subject that we're going to speak about is we're going to try to explain the juxiposition of paras to the end of parasal. Now actually I discovered something amazing because this whole series is based on the fact that there's a significance to the juxosition of the paris. Did you ever notice sometimes Rashi says let's say last week and I think in most people's minds Rashi does it every week but he really doesn't. He seldom does it. And yet, if you look in the medish, the medish always does it. And I never took notice. When does Rashi say? When does Rashi not say? Furthermore, Rashi this week explains the justosition, but he never asks. So, let's discuss that a little bit. This week's juosition, I'm sure you're all familiar with. It's it's very wellnown. We know that paras kak uh begins with the uh mutiny and it's juxtaposed to the uh topic of talis and at the end of and the medish says openly what did he take says what does it say above jumped and he tells is or potter. So Masha says says a talis that's old can't potter itself and four strings potter it and then says I always wondered how knew what my house looked like but is a house full of is it says says the whole Torah is 274 parasites doesn't the house one pars said you made the whole thing up by the way you ever wonder I understand how kazal know that kak started up with sitsus because the end of talks about sitsus and it says we got korak where did kazal get that korak started up with where they get that from that who where did that? So in the he brings from the who asks so he brings they made what says and it says byris but the cleer says something amazing. He says they got it from it says by they were what were they doing by the doorway? What were doing by the doorway? The answer is they were using the doorway to start up with what was their accusation? accusation was it's so now if you look in the now you see the medish the medish doesn't say the medish just says what did kak take by the way what did kak take me he took a talis that's what he took the medish is bothered what did he take the answer is he took a talis if you look in the rishim like the zanim just it's very interesting the rishim cuz now look at this made a he wrapped himself in a talis that's all and he said or not said was leg he said one string pers the whole thing and the whole if the whole bag is it doesn't bother itself but if you look in the one of the rauikdar he brings lus said to you jumped to his wife. He said so his wife said I'll make a talis all of she made the talis for him and she brought it to kayak that's according to raw now rashi did you notice does rashi in the beginning of kyak say no all rashi says is So the Rashi doesn't say the words. Now the says well if Rashi brings up that put on the pair of of that means Rash's dashing. Listen to this says Rashi doesn't always dash in par say no. You know why? Because Rashi's policy is so for instance you can't ask a question. Did you ever wonder why does the letter B come after A? You know why? Because it comes after it. That's what's next. You know why? Why does the number 30 come after 29? Cuz that's the next number. You can't ask a question. Why when you uh go from New York to Ohio, do you first hit Pennsylvania? You know why? Because that's the state in between. Rashi will only deal with the if it's out of order. So if it's out of order, why did it put it in this order? The principle of the isi in general does not explain the because you can only ask if the forer jump through hoops to put it in that order because it's out of order. So says why is Rashi asking after the came the sin of says says the uh because it's not true paras does not come after parl what was kak's fight what was karak's fight his his problem was he was challenging the the nus of elit saf. Yeah. Okay. Does anybody remember when moherenu appointed elitel? He appointed him in the beginning of bidbar. That's before. So then what's kra doing now? You hear the what's bothering rashi? Rashi in general. Let me get ash. Could you hear me? Rashi in general. Schlommo, >> come here. Bring me that at the end of the table, >> please. Over there. It's under the tim. Rashi in general does not explain unless there's something indicating that it should be explained because there's no reason to explain. You know why? because it happened in that order. Rashi only explains it if it's out of order and in this case it's out of order because appointed that was earlier on. So what's Karak doing now? The answer is it's to be to the now where now I want to add I didn't write this but it just occurred to me then it fits in beautifully. Rashi in the beginning of kayak does not ask lisk because not a question lan it happened then only after rashi brings in the third rashi that kak started up because of elite saf oh elite saffine but that happened earlier then rashi brings in immediately kayak took the talisim why does rashi only say it then because it's only of significance when you realize that if kayak was starting up because of elit saf so then The paras are not written. So what's doing? The answer is took the where did the get this rule from that rashi only ask if things are out of order. It's the rebel misrai who's the most important commentary on rashi in the beginning of this my son showed me last week. Last week we're talking about the so I figured I'll have the easiest time. Rashi himself says paresum and paresiam. So my son asked, "What do you mean lisk?" Because first was the sin of Miriam and then was the sin of the Maglam. That's not a question. And the answer is it's not true. The did not happen right after Miriam's episode. The the says actually the par of some say the par of happened first. By the way, look at the earlier in he says In other words, when does Rashi bring the midrashim that and when not? rais is only bringing the medish that's close to shikra by the way do you ever notice that if you look in the medish the medish will bring five perushim and rashi only brings one of them why because rash's job is to tell you he's only going to quote the midrashim that fit into the simple reading of the medish therefore those paris that didn't happen chronologically then rashi is going to bring the medish of lman and those midrash that are explaining two episodes that happened backto back that rashi will not explain fine now I want to offer another connection between the para And the para of very simple in par we say don't turn after your heart and after your eyes. Why did sin hit us? His eye led him astray. The purpose of titsus is so that your eye doesn't lead you astray. And Kyra's eye led him astray. So that's Kyak didn't learn the limit of titus. The limud of titus is that your eye should not lead you astray. Look in the hamar the explains why that sitsus was the point of contention between you can look over there he explains what was it about the titsus that uh incited kak um watch This this is a interesting idea. If if you remember when when we speak about the Indian of Yeshua we always ask if Yeshua is so important where in the Tyra does it say that there will be a gula where does it talk about it in the Kish? Here's a very unknown uh source. It's so unknown I didn't know it. I didn't put it in the safer. I was not aware of this. Twice it says why the answer is the first time. If you remember, we once discussed this at length that was right but not at the right time said what do we need you for everyone's holy. The truth is there will be a time that everyone will be holy when it will be and others speak about how thought that they reached the gul and therefore was not needed the way he's needed today. There's an idea that in the end meaning will have some type of redemption. All of his his Tina was right. It was just premature. That's why the number of kak is Daniel Simmon indicating Daniel was the one who knew the kates indicating that the para of kak has its place when in the future. That's the juxiposition. You ready for this? the ani hashem that's the p that articulates that hashem will redeem the Jewish people and when that day comes the whole will be true but the problem was it was premature but that's the josition then the whole par has standing here's one This is there is a kish from one of the pug called parades y you ever see paradis yo it's on bacius sham and vikra it's one of the classic from the pugam I want to tell you who wrote it and get his name uh correctly. Parades was written >> what? >> No salant wrote >> right. I'm sorry. >> Yeah. The paradise was Rabio Patanovski. Rabio Patanovski. Yeah. Here, look. I'll put up on the screen. Ravio Patanovski. You see this? Uh, this is what it looks like. Rabio Patanovski. Uh, anyway, Rab Patanovski only wrote David Abraam of Ben completed it on Bidbar and Devaram. Okay. In paras Rabbi Mandelb brings an amazing thing that said it's not found in any of the is published in a journal ready and I have here on the sheet. It was a journal called that brought that he heard from his The numerical value of is MS if you take the add the seven letters meaning the gumach plus the seven letters that's why we say ms meaning. So says now we understand the says that you're not behing to even in the itself it says MS. So why doesn't it say MS? We can't say the word MS in connection to Kyak. So we got to leave MS out of the but to the idea. And by the way, and the reason I'm mentioning this is this is an amazing MS. Okay, there you go. >> Recording stopped.