Review the weekly Daf Yomi Zevachim Pages 104 to 111 with Rav Yehuda Spitz

Okay, good morning everybody. We're going to pick up on the bottom. Get to the we're picking up where we stopped off last week. So continues with the sh over here. He has a what would be if it left before this would it become possible or not? Right away the questions might come very late. Rashi explains what's the question say so why in the world should you think it become possible on that and he explains as follows the whole sh is as follows the mand the sh is only the mand holds but in a scenario of kum where left before is and it's not do we say such that we understand over here before this. So that's why and now I'm going to bring it what are we discussing? We're talking about the perman that wanted to get burned by by the however what happened was and we're understanding so it's you see over there and over there with understanding there is the concept of says no over here what we're discussing rather it's the like we saw earlier last week we had a very similar term So here it's the and again we continue with now is that the animal t left the mdash however but if you look at the right it's very fascinating do we look at the a and therefore it's only a meat or we look at the animal and the animals right left so again right of the a's inside so what is the mouth do we say to the We go bus and therefore what is inside we go that's let's be real outside that says there's no to say that you should go the animal there's no sh that it's considered so what would be the shil It's smack in half. So where would be what would the sh be suddenly? However, if you go a where's the it's half and half but do you look at the not such a case and again see have half the body inside half the outside but the is outside. Oh, you on the topic of we go busting the animal and let's be real animal. We can't say there's outside and now we're going to b with a take. He explained the question. We're talking about the sh of is not about the rather it's about the but about the people carrying it. So you have five people [snorts] the animal however partial there's still two people inside therefore consider and the we all agree the is not considered outside therefore we're going to with a take so the discussing explains the we're talking about the tomb and therefore What happened was it left we all know there's then it's so the sh went back so what will be the shoo the second you left the mdish we said there's a trigger and what's the trigger the trigger is considered just like it never went back it's almost like we have a button we call the reset button like you press it again it's practice square one let's bring See these people slapping them with poles. What do we say earlier? This is the top of the base. What does it say? If you're going to tell me this concept, the ones who left the trigger is already there. Even in such a case where came back why is it not consider yes start over is this the whole where we come out this whole in order to say you become is the concept that you have to leave the what would be the sh right the sh is keep He says he brings down from the meet it's a maco like a staff like a stick. I'm picturing him more like a fishing hook. More of like something, you know, you grab that's easier to understand. What is the people are sending out to also and the person involved in the burning it is tells us to become however the itself the animal itself the carcass itself. However, however, no he says as follows. Is it going to be very fast and it comes out even though it's we're telling us it becomes however handle. However, we never find such a concept that mayor in such a case mayor then we understand he's not he puts who is he going like the was this time he says as follows it says in the call zer this is the talks out in the talking about the next says really need we all know the concept of and it says it lands on who why because there's no there's no such a concept of a zer of a seat to what to become which what is the However, if there is a concept that eventually could be anything that's eventually going to lead to that such a concept that so that we can understand that's going like if holds like the ton How do you understand that you want to be one towards the bottom of it? How do you understand if you hold the concept of if you don't hold this where would you have this type of concept on that what we're saying is need a from what it could be from it does not need to be if anything it doesn't need to be when we're saying it could mean for example however something that eventually will hit the which is what case the however we're saying that you don't need a What's the do we say? So we always have the concept that you need to have it really has to do with the if you don't have the it's taking up it's causing that you can't have this effect. So you have the case and you want it to be that it's do you want it to be it's the question becomes do we look at it as do we say so a person has what is According to our mayor, this is the shord there's no we don't have such a sh however because according to we all know the whole the whole is so what is what is everyone agrees that when it's sitting on the ground there's no sh that it doesn't come to when it's in your mouth. So where in the world do you have a when you're holding in your hand, you're about to eat it? Do we look how do you look at someone who's about to, you know, you see literally a still picture and he's holding it in the middle. What what is that or not? that we're on the topic of based. Therefore, what? Therefore, we're going to say it's we just said earlier that accord now we're going to show off the price. So, that's not so simple. We're gonna have actually the what is the one of them is in order what are we discussing? We're discussing that a person wants to bear a less than a to be the question is you want it to be. So he says as follows it needs to have you need to have intent to bear. However you don't need a we all know means to be why is like we just said earlier. So it's not a problem. What's the question? And it says over here clearly says my how could you in the world say here we clearly says no it's not arguing on that who's the one who says this mayor mayor mayor mayor where it says we learned this we learned the sugd it doesn't turn into that then what we learned this it's so it comes out very very answers in yes we find this many times say for you have to know again exactly how gummoras operate that sometimes the answer is yes sometimes it says because of that or gives on a new do not sit down I want you to stand until you can explain to me the what so we're discussing over here again according to mayor what mayor even we learned about the is going to However, what's the sh the is regarding do we say how do we look at it? Do we look at we all could turn into and then the could go and do with or maybe only has a power of and it's give it a sh as follows if it's if however and over here we all know what is going to be it's only with so we clearly it's So say and do we say very similar gave the same answer and and when it's not over here we understand that it's What is the when they both left? We saw the Misha tells us However, how do we know that we're saying in such a case that you're tell what are we discussing over here? We're discussing over here by the by the is talking about the that it says over there. We're discussing again we have over here the power of and the regular part this says that it's what does it say is says in the clearly tells us in the you have to remove what does that mean? It means however what does it say? You don't have to say this. Why already says this? And again we have another which you don't need to say this. Now says it clearly the tell us. So okay. So what do we have over here? We have two powers. We have the power. This is the first where it says by the power and we have by the power of so we're bringing from there we clearly see that once it leaves the and then we saw this by the power of the we saw this from all these that holds in our is only when you touch it he doesn't hold this concept What's he going to do with this? What's he going to do with this? This is the power of the clearly says over there. That's talking about again it's coming from the on the top which direction you going to attack it flows up we have a brace that says we're talking about the power of the where do you burn it let's soften your you burn it in the north like every type of you burn in the north let's soften your shalim however Where is it burnt? It needs to be where it was ready. However, it's a however that they both agree to the concept where it needs to be. However the is doesn't need to be and that will agree to what the point he's trying to bring agrees to the concept that it needs to be ready to play the ready was however the person who's burning in the telling us that a person's however the person that's lighting it THAT'S BUSY WITH THE fire is not another one is he's not either What is a person? says, "However, once once becomes a little char in a scenario where it's what it's where it gets very charred." So the is you could look it as apher because why it's not and it says however you say it's not okay we're going to start a brand new per which is discussing this per is going to discuss is basically if you don't mind bring on the way back it says that this is throughim through all the way through test with and a simple will discuss the and it says as follows through talks about all of so we clearly have the follow through Zion It says in of it's in par where it talks about and all the in the beginning which we're going to quote over and over. We're going to discuss very big is all but level talks about is it's to be and then it's going to discuss the last of so let's see it inside we're going to go eventually we're going to see throughout the throughout the next we're going to see all the how it correlates and we're going to be diet from the tok I think already last week we went through nu quite uh intense and well so let's jump right into the par So a person did where he did however said it depends if you did inside okay and then I can understand but we're going to discuss but if you Why? Because you're already outside. And if it's outside, it's a double ple and tell them I don't understand your basically you're trying to tell me whenever it leaves that it's every single case even the scenario where you did the second you left outside that wasn't who defended himself. We're going to see we're going to go through it and how is going to answer back this then we had another case the person's we already discussed this many times if a person's he cannot eat according to it doesn't make a difference whether the not the reality is your discuss we'll get there however No depends if I'm rely on that. I understand every time you want to eat something. How does it work? The second you touch it, however, Tyus does throw in you could have a scenario. You did it like as you stuck the the enals right down the throat. place says we don't want to say a case which is not it's not we're discussing a regular case trying to bring out THE POINT EVERY SIMPLE CASE EVERY TIME YOU touch it you become possible again we're going to discuss this will the final case so let's jump right into the right into we understand that We're going to discuss how do we know this like it says in the very clearly what's it say in the this is the end this is the where it says in the so if you look inside of this it says and it clearly says he clearly is going to get so we know what his we know what his punishment Like it says [screaming] either the words or the words pen or last an say so you have both however however we can understand again we also have the we agree to this earlier where it says where it says where he says the it says in the anything to do with what we're trying to bring out the point anything to do with so tomorrow this is we discuss in where is throwing rocks on it even though he didn't do it the direct So where in the world he telling me that we're using this for that we have this needed to use this for the so we have to tell us both we still needed this for the price it says what are we talking about we're talking about ready we're standing base. It says this again this is talking about the tell on a simple level if we keep going back to this whatever really starts but the point is through discuss and the last discuss is talking about which is talking it says like we just learned what are we discussing when it's considered and this is says but what's the point this lengthy the point is we're clearly learning from the comes to tell us that it's therefore the so back to square one where do we know is hello we're learning this Where's this still? He says if you tell me this why do we have the world? Why in the world do you need to have that? What do we see? YOU CAN'T LEARN A from wants to say you can't learn out from he's saying it's not a good riot we all know it's not you learn he keeps trying to bring and try to tell we all know it's Even sorry even says even something so small. We all know continues. We never have it that it's ever going to be we could find it is however again we have could be this is what this is what would have the question is nicer nicer and you don't get cars. We clearly know the punishment we see from very clearly. You can't learn that can't learn. No, you can't learn from it's not a question. Why we all know this is the whole concept that has this whole this whole this whole concept is we could be let's take a step back. This is again Rashi brings out the whole how do we know the whole concept of sister over there even learn because he learns for something else he agrees that's on a simple level it's not we're not going to go through that whole but a simple level we all know over there the agrees We're going to go into we're not going to come into rather what we're going to do is we're going to make it says and it says doesn't use the if you look inside it says it says we all agree explicitly like we said earlier We're not learning from rather wants to say we're on the top of what does say there is a little different. It says in the isot. What does it say in the P? I'm going to read it inside. SAYS so the first is clearly what's the second when it says TALKING ABOUT WHAT IS YOU HAVE AND ALL THESE different of which is so we then we understand from the and then you took it outside we understand like it says in that we just like we just learned that what is discussing it's discussing something was however YOU TOOK IT OUTSIDE. SO THIS IS the so we find this whole concept of what he took it outside but how do you know in a scenario for example there was supposed to be outside and not even inside says this is talking about the beginning of paral and when it says in the ish This is the P of ready where it starts discussing and we're learning the P with learn it almost very interesting. We learn it like an where it's going upon them. It's going on. We just learned earlier with this continue with that concept right away. You know how to read it says it with it doesn't say with an that's the whole concept with depends how you learn it with an with an al. It's two separate meanings. It would say it was an iron. It doesn't have the lamb. That's the look of the we're coming from the what? coming from THE we all know this to tell us even we're learning the from coming from different again says and it says like we saw earlier by When you learn the it clearly goes through the goes through all 36 we have another one. There's two cases one and one and that again Rashi goes through that we do find out that even when it talks about the doesn't say she says because we find throughout where explains it explicitly in the here we don't have such a concept is nowhere so what are you talking doar is going to bide with a kasha We learned this in the mission. We're going to discuss this answer in a few minutes. It says if you do a little you didn't do you only did one application one. How do we know it's considered as reco says in the when it says in the coming. So again, we're going to see we're trying to figure out. So either we have which is coming from the when it says it's so we're going to have to remember this very well because we're going to keep going back. What is going to do with the other? What's going to do with whenever we have two different we have to know the back and forth what each one will say about the other. So it's okay. So you learning what do we find what's you don't think you need and it's good enough one of them. Ah you don't need he's coming from the he says what's the say what's he going to say for this which we're going to see this is actually going to be a very big which we're going to see. SO WE'RE LEARN THIS TO TELL US THE only where does he know this when it says what's mean what's it mean all of it we need it for both so we're going to show us this is again we brought let's go back to how would he know this oh sorry now we have to go back to how is he going to work with ah where's going to learn in a scenario to tell us if a person is not considered anything outside. What's coming to teach us? think is not good. So we clearly see that for what again it's not that over there there's a whole learn from that doesn't need three that's good enough but the point is he learns it for a different of So where do we know this concept? This mish tells us that a person does [laughter] why you tell me why do I need where you tell ME WHERE'S THE TO TELL ME A in order to understand you first need understand you know where you should think you should learn from the what we all know what are discussing we all know if a person if a person's Not what's the case not it's coming from the says he has to be such a person where you don't have such a concept. [clears throat] So again, how it work? You want to learn? It's not going to work. Maybe you should learn from. Again, we're trying to find us. Why in the world should you think in order to question where's the you want to learn from like we just said you can learn how to taste him is what is again the reason why is because it needs to be it needs to be it needs to be ending is not. So again by and which they have after you won't be maybe you'll say the topic of maybe you shall learn out from what would be the would be what would be the what are you going to tell me you want to learn out from ah you're going to tell me has the concept of show there's no problem I'll tell you this is the both is bring so tomorrow I'll show you that we don't have a conv do you need IT LEARN ITSELF from and that we're saying doesn't work. They can't learn out from this concept of what is. So again to understand this we need to know where they're coming from what do we have we sort of either they're coming from or now on that we're trying to say is going to say is follows when you did and now you're coming from the what is talking about et because it's coming from the concept However, what is even accord which has nothing to do with the of however according to is coming like we just saw earlier which discusses also the concept of how and the third case then a scenario where you did you did and you did then according to everyone agrees because it's not relevant even according to that's coming from the you're going to tell for one they're going to put a together you have the concept of earlier. So tomorrow, however, however, in a scenario of says in the again to read the parentheses or not, it says in the How do you know? It's still therefore we can understand the point is we're trying to bring out in such a case over here it's you won't be you won't be a scenario where you did it by mistake wants to say therefore so a person did a where's that how do you look at it do you look at it's considered obeys and he says as follows. So I look at it in a simple level and therefore what is the whole coming to tell us to get context it sounds like as long as it's inside even though it's not maybe the but it's in we're understanding see go back and say the other way around. Maybe it's coming to the it's coming a scenario tomorrow. So who cares? So the case is other way around. on and that comes the can tell us in such a scenario that what is we're going to discuss in a simple level of we discussed this a few times throughout this concept on a simple level do we have today do we have you know do we have today or not so it's a big again we're going to discuss is actually if you have to be an on That's going to be the future. But on a simple level, what is someone who is non what would be the very simple this is the is the big if we Say till today we have name of this is actually what is when they built they built they had the curtains they however the question is where were the workers did you put on a simple level did you put the curtains to block the workers from viewing inside the therefore in such a scenario if you picture it you would have the wall and THEN THE WORKERS WORKING OUTSIDE THE WALL or the other way around almost like the not the sea but the workers working inside this is the it says so is going to tell us the what the concept of lovely argu and that's why what that's why you have to make this you have to make this because this is the brings down the discusses the is you need to have a physical structure so they started off with the least curtains that's why you need it whyever not for yes saying what they hurt you ask me ah if has nothing to do with why in the world you need the curtains I'LL TELL YOU VERY simplely it's very good there was no right now we're going to have a discuss discussion of the of or not. So now we're going to start off the shear of an is a bone bone is no however what is the we all know it could be more than that we're going to discuss if it's if if you should put it back if there's even a mitzvah we're going to see in a moment even by me where the Torah tells us explicitly to put it to make sure it's salted but ON A SIMPLE LEVEL ON ITS own agrees is not a question becomes what is when you have the which is a little less than gaz and you have which is a little less than gaz maybe look at it together and therefore what in a simple level an animal with who cares. So as follows [snorts and clears throat] the however the is what we call even though it's on its own it's nothing but could be attached what is the how do we look at something that's attached therefore you're everyone agrees Okay, that's a case of what? That's a case of now we're going to discuss a case of however so we're discussing says we're discussing the more than that Rashi brings down says in the is even for whatever reason salt either went off it you forgot to do it you got to go dip it in salt and put it back maybe that's why I think today where comes in this So what is right away? because we can understand it much better. Everyone agrees. It's part of the part of the can even sometime it's somewhat of an animal which is like like I'll tell you if to go back then make sure to put it back on. However, like we saw earlier says to go back and dip it in the salt demolition and again what are you going to with? We're going to bl with the if it's considered a or not. So we saw in the beginning of the paragos on which we discuss he wanted to say if a person did and SAID I DON'T UNDERSTAND EVERY TIME what is the possible so what is tak going to be's response back. So the is going to bring for whatever reason we're not bringing response he didn't respond but we're GOING TO SEE ANSWERS for response to this and he says it follows don't compare your was every time goes outside how do you basically understand he says it follows we understand very and then that was one time actually back you can't compare it because over there had what we all agree even all agreed that at the time it was in it was good So right away my both sound in a simple level very similar. The point is what's cares if it's a which is the you need to be the point is that they both sound very simple as follows. I'll find you what would be of what is inside. So since according to what is it never had a moment however according to the second case it's still why again there's no that everyone agrees however still that will work we're going. We're going to the network again. What was our basic every time you touch to eat something you touch it, you become now we discussed already says he could find a case where you put IT IN YOUR MOUTH. SO WHAT what would answer to that? So right away is so on a simple level we all know and then we have we could have a you have to remember let's use the cases follow Sunday the person became Monday the became tummy So in such a case where in on Sunday you became tummy what is since you're tummy you can't eat what even now that you can't eat you had a plate that you saw was ready tummy but you tummy now we have a concept of teaches you that once you become this was already tummy doesn't make a DIFFERENCE IF I BECOME no however when you have a concept now that I became who the second portion becomes Now we can understand to make even something there was already tummy. So I want to say as follows there's no there's no on Sunday you were telling me why she came to the question becomes is what Sunday the bus became to then Monday you became going to come into the kinds However, basically no, we don't say. However, it's not going to work. Very nice. You don't have to come out. But you should find the concept of which is much more. He could go both ways. One has the concept very nice but there's always a concept of therefore you can't bring it out something each one has on a simple level each one has it's what's the which we're going to see in the isar is going to bring this all out and however throws in wait a second you're still either way for doing it for somebody else you know is where you did a for that person because you did amazed in a scenario you're but you in such a case however did it together. We have to see why. So therefore what is kept doing over and over and your memory keeps on going. So it's the point is you keep on forgetting we're discuss many many understand this accord does not need even it's good enough again needs to be on the right away. What does the telling me is like it says in the what does it say in the who is the problem? Okay, I get it. It's not gonna work. It says in the tell us even if you're right away more questions right away for tomorrow. Whoa, whoa, whoa. Why are you coming to tell me? What is the difference tomorrow? No. Shiny shiny. Awesome. What does it say in the over there in what does it say to tell us for tomorrow I don't understand this go look inside the test has the exact same notion of so on the top of [snorts] the scenario of you need to be the what in such a case comes to tell us otherwise actually if you look inside it says twice it says and then it says since it says both we can understand but this talking about what do you do with you don't need it says who twice which you're going to learn soon that is the tells us but still this is the you would think And that was saying who is this however to tell us what to do with the what is he going to do what does he learn now he learns that from the Where's again this has to with which we're not going to go so extensive saying the same say from where does it say which is [snorts] that tell We saw the we saw the says however argues says now we're going to see this and three actually four different we're going to see we're going to start with then we're going to see which itself has two and then we're going to see. So let's jump inside to stay focused of here because it's quite extensive. What is the what the whole is? We're talking about one animal but not one and chopped up pieces rather a bunch of different limbs. When it says in the to tell us there's no such thing as and a bunch of different limbs. The only time is for one animal. Therefore, you keep it going. Picture you have a big animal and your im has chopped it up and you keep it thrown into the fire. The is only for what you look you don't look at the you don't look at it piece by piece rather you look at the whole animal from the that's what the IS TELLING ALL of it every single time. You're not throwing in one shot. you're doing but the point is you're only for the whole as a whole that is when it says what's it going on it's going on the entire however therefore you agree the limb itself if you chop it up into multiple pieces but the animal you break it up by limb this is who So on a simple level we're going we're going how do you look at it second to explain the basic is as follows the itself is a scenario. So the whole is talking about did all had one limb and what happened and where did you however again so would be is one where is is a third opinion. So what that's says the whole is And the last the fourth opinion which we're going to see is however this is where you have an animal on his back where bursting that is going now like who is this were holding such a case. What do we say were such a case? So it comes out on a simple level to give a quick summary we have four different opinions of the again we're going with the way we explain has a whole different it's not we're going to do it in a level we're going through we just saw a moment ago is when a person's a few limbs of one animal what is it's called no it's called then we is what we discussing that a person was a few little pieces of what of in [laughter] coming from just like we understand that if it bursted [laughter] you return it so too however is going to say because again the Tyra is not discussing in a scenario of a verb that were split up into a bunch of pieces. However, they both agree. So again the whole is according to is then we had is wants to say no is the why since we're understanding that when it says it's coming to be such a case that we're missing says no we're talking about and then we had which is basically is and then we had then we had that was very similar to but how do you understand that he's saying according to you don't return however is going to say you do it however we saw that according to what is you are you are wow Okay. We sought you only until it's on the So what is the if you needed to be the you know where is coming from? It says what does it say? It just says Iraq. It doesn't need to be How are you going to just don't need no arrive? If it comes to send back that's how you read it. Again, this is only we learned already. This is like the I don't think it means to mean maybe does mean the 32 but the 32 or it just means a square. Okay. Could be a simple level just means a square you don't need a carbon copy of the it's good enough. Okay. That we understand there. Therefore, you don't need a car. You don't need a K. You don't need aesh. We learned this. We had earlier. I think it was we discussed. We have certain animals that the puzzle nothing to do with the Bdash even beforehand. However, saying doesn't mean rather together. So it's why we're discussing the we're discussing and it gets completely burnt says this is again it says it's the the minister of we're discussing again which is the least of the and we're talking about says means then they went again. We all know the only two things you do on the top of the red line. Everything else the bottom of the red line. Tell us. So he said a person. What is what is in such a scenario? We make a however like the mission already tells us right away we can understand when it says really so we understand is completely burnt. So tomorrow we even find this in it says people. So therefore we clearly see this concept which is going to change we understand like says gets completely burnt. The question becomes on the people of tomorrow how do you understand why should it be different why should it be suddenly and again we're discussing why should it be to be with the we have the concept everyone agrees to that so more than that we have a price that clearly says that Ple and nicer. It is mitzarif. It's a law. So you have the against and the says on that answers no first we're going the where it talks about where it says it's ahead you ate it in a scenario where you ate it and what this price is discussing is And the reason why doesn't work, we've learned this already. You can't have the opposites again. What we all know is could only really happen. What are we talking about? We're talking about the nearest talking about and there was leftover Kaziah's Ber. Yeah, but you left over the bus. What is someone who has a kazh's buster left over? You can't throw it. And since you can't throw it, IT'S ALMOST LIKE SINCE YOU CAN'T THROW IT, YOU CAN'T HAVE NICER. It's not possible because I can't do why because I'm only left with the I don't throw out what you're left over with. Then you do throw it. If you throw it, you could have the concept of nice. Who is this? However, this is the point since he could do his could have nicer. However, tomorrow's pap you have the concept is what you are going to throw it all together. However, you lost you lost the bus of the you would think maybe throw out the because it was going to go that we don't look at as you wouldn't touch it because you don't have the bus the top of the However, he left. So again on a simple level we're going to discuss this extensively now but the Mish is telling us all these concepts you have the you have the we're talking about the and now very crucial to understand this that the you were what did you do you did a biker and what is that means literally split I think it means and the point is a regular a regular is a would be means we're talking about So every morning what did you do? You had to do a this is when it says in such a scenario the mission comes to tell us in anybody's m even a kaz outside why we're discussing when it says again we learned this is coming to tell us what is aim is what of kaz we're going to have to see we're going to come out is going to tell us inami press might even be with we have to see the might even be but the point is however in such a case says no you have to be of anything the second you remove anything why he holds becomes poss comes possible [clears throat] is my potter. When it says over here is potter, my potter is what is on a simple level that if we're not talking about then who is it? Why are you put again? We're talking about when it says this is this is the so if so why am I in no doesn't mean the why because it's the other way around why in the world should you be aashi is that is the That's the point. And how could it be? What are we discussing again? The point is we're discussing how could be We're talking about the where where is it where you do it inside the there's going to tell us the says clearly in the Torah you need to do two handfuls two scoops where it talks about the so [snorts] how could you tell me that IT'S NOT THE OH, THE SHE'S NOTHING. WHAT DO YOU MEAN? It clearly explicitly tells us whenever tells us what ONE WORD. So is so what is going on argues in he says no that we agree that what you need? No one argues in that. So what would be talking about? But where did he do? [clears throat] We're talking about the is of which we're going to see in a moment. But the point is what is because the point is the Point we're trying to bring is that if he will learn out how could he tell me over here over here when you had just like what what is so to say the same thing because he says as follows we're talking about we designated two half the we're talking about we're talking And it's good. So what would be the case over here is where you have two half money designated and the topical is going to tell us and if it's a therefore therefore in such a case it'll be ple and if therefore if you're what do you understand? because he holds the what designating is a good designation. Therefore missing out a little is ple whenever it's needs to be no it's nothing and therefore what you got to understand the reason why in order to basically we have to understand if it's possible in the base of mdash I'm part outside because it needs to be equal and if I'm in if I'm not partial in the base of mdash I'm outside it's the opposites it comes out If we think about it, like we just said a moment ago. So, so there's a person and there's a few different depending on what type of animal it was. Was it an is it a C? Was it a lamb? The point was it a par and EACH ONE THE TORAH TELLS US we learned that we all know if it's a what does it need the Torah tells us if it's what if it's an isle for and if it's a it's but now that you're telling me this concept that the point is even if I put it in for a par for example parvan however but it's not designation it's worthless not worthless But the nation's nothing could work either for the or for the what or for the now they were saying this concept is not good enough which is the for the same. However, everyone agrees if you go under the sh which is giml then everyone agreed that slogan doesn't work you be however is going back to the kash earlier is going back to earlier was we saw the whole of don't bring me and you don't have a tashra I want to go like a bison earlier and we talk you can't compare the two. We discuss tells us So again, if you missed anything and you on the way down the stand you be would mean that if you didn't it's possible. That's the that's the two-way street. It left when it left it was good. Where did it become? For whatever reason, either piece got lost or something happened that it's now happened. So it's possible. It needs to be that right now. It needs to be even though it's needs to be full. What do you see from there? is then it needs to be complete. What is the whole shil? We're not going he's either way problematic. We can't even have the only love. Isn't this a scenario right away? No. We have a very similar says the same. No. We said now we're going explain how many and it needs to be tell us when we're burning sunba Allah. So we understand there needs to be mish touching them as fast. In fact tomorrow why is she flipped it. So again like we said ra wants to say we saw this type of concept. We saw this by the domin [snorts] but he didn't do the went back very fascinating such a case is why when it went back we're going to the last case in the Mishna where you did a bounced Why don't you have a problem? We all know about says we find this in where it says the took and he took the and we all know that the dama is. So therefore what we're making this concept next needs to go together again. What is the as follows? A person was what? A person was just and the point of is let me get halfway. I don't need full but only get halfway and we're going so do we say only on half maybe whatever but overall it's not even on half going to be why because it's going if you can on half. So according to say you could do pagle on half. This is the bring down there where a person have only but not there becomes. You go in the water. Who is this? Like the sh is over here. You're over here even when a scenario where it's one of them. You see from over here we have a doesn't help and that we're going to bl and we're talking about even that mixes in the The reason is therefore it's considered regular fmius that is in such a case he wants to say what do we see from then the point is where a person for example was doing the zikas and then it got lost had a heart that died whatever it is the point is you had to get a new one and where do you continue from the third za for example you don't start over what do you see from there otherwise you would have to start over how do we know This is talking about on the sixth day says what's the plural? So what do we see from there? We clearly see the what this concept is the he had a bunch of questions. She telling me that this is the right that's the right sounds like what again even with the look he should have said explicitly give a look. So they say now from before and the point is clearly says over here. What is the point? It's what is the when a person does if a person did what? If he did talk tomorrow, what's the difference if he felt what? What is this? that a person is what would be if you did FIVE even though what even though you filled it up why it's not a problem that the is not it's not a problem it's not says it has to be spits the WHAT IS THAT nothing for therefore what would be the if you filled up let's say fivean there it's not going to work it's not not going to be because that's not the more than that the has to be specific the unless it's right and more than is not right so that would be enough the top of the final this whole this is really totally So let's explain a little. We're not going to go too much into this but explain a little what does it mean the clearly tells us that when a person came when we came to we clearly had to do with the now the question is okay that's the question becomes was there in the midbar or not. Now if you're telling me that there was comes out that the is not coming to tell us anything new really we already had comes to tell us the what's the telling us really it's coming the is coming to tell us which is that's the whole point we're talking about the not coming rather the is coming to tell us by what now that became however everyone agrees It's not a sh that there was no kay there was no kay with it even when there's no cliches however but if you have there's no and therefore what comes the to tell us it's not going to the is not coming to tell us the only reason why you're telling us that the is talking about because you already had what else is the coming to tell us however if you hold there WAS NO IN THE COMING TO tell us right now the talking about rather a regular there by what was the was so it comes out if you do without your so again that's in a simple level what's it means that again is that he wants to tell us this will be the of if you hold again if you hold there was the midbar has to come in the house and if you did without the is not coming from rather it's coming from the and therefore you would be if you did without according to coming to tell us no and there's no clue so what's it mean and therefore you be like so what would be the shar I agree the question because you look at it the what was only had a so do you look at didn't have a cle therefore or maybe I'm sorry because had a cle or not do we look at or not and that way Everyone holds this all everyone agrees. The only is if you can learn and there has to be tomorrow. What is more than what is so means what happens when you overflow. So it's overflow and we all agree. The question is it is however it's not in Scottish. Why? because it needs to be in the again this is really you don't need a cle however the say like we saw earlier on the top of if there was real when it says in the when it talks about it says what's the telling us it says the And here recording from the end of the it says what's telling us what's that says in the now what is the underlying is that if there were or not we're going and he answered him what the lambs. saw that I'm now the question over here is going to tell me that it's easy out over here is not gal this whole parenthesis if you look rather if you look inside the way you read it is the gear of is they bring that over here in the rather answer is going I hold I hold but according to you you should agree that the What is the he did the very simple he did the inside what happens we all know is only doesn't usually work is worthless on the topic of base makes sense It comes out very fascinating that the right way is going to say you read it the really causing the because that's the inside. So again if you do inside which is the makes it that I'm outside when I do outside the opposite way. If I do inside he says. So it sounds like that if you did for example a con he says but if you do you're not in such a case right away what are you reading as a you got to read that's the one that's causing more easy out so what do we say Sounds like whatever outside what case is he going on what however on that says just like so tomorrow if so can't be going in the case >> [laughter] >> So what's the case of rather going to the rather tell he's going to just like we do if So you're going to go in the case of clear says explicitly otherwise. So what is the case that is going to be as follows? What is the also therefore you be and therefore what that However, except that wants to say, this is how you read it. However, So too you read it. read it. The the scenario is like he made a maliko outside. I'm going to pick up from the Mishna.