Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Reb Yehudah Hanasi the gilgul of Yaakov Avinu
0 views
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
We just concluded the
encounter that Yaakov Avinu had together
with Esau.
And perhaps the pinnacle of this
encounter is when Yaakov meets not only
Esau in the flesh, but he meets the
spiritual pnimeus she'airish that of
Esau, and that is Esau the malach. And
lemaaseh Yaakov is successful against
both. Ki sa reisha Amalek
va Anochin va Tuval.
The medrish
in parshas Vayishlach, and Rashi and
Rabbeinu quotes the medrish,
says that Rabbeinu Hakadosh, as in
Rabbeinu Yehudah Hanasi, kad havi solek
lemalchusa, when he would descend to
Rome to meet with the kaisar of Rome,
havi mistakel ba ad parshas parshasa. He
would go through this parsha, he would
begin with parshas Vayishlach. So the
hakana that Rabbeinu Hakadosh would make
before he would meet with
the melech of Rome he was, he would sit
down and he would learn Chumash Rashi
and the Ramban, and he would go through
the beginning of parshas Vayishlach.
Parshas Vayishlach, which describes the
encounter between Yaakov and Esau, was
the hakana of Rabbeinu Hakadosh when he
would go ahead and he would meet with
the melech of Rome he in his time.
Poshet shat in this medrish is
based on something that the Ramban
repeats many times here in parshas
Vayishlach. First time he says it is in
his hakdama to parshas Vayishlach. So
you know the Ramban wrote a hakdama to
certain parshas, right? Certain parshas
have like a little keppel. There's a
little hakdama to the parsha. Parshas
Vayishlach is one of those parshas. And
the Ramban says as follows, that this
whole parsha that we're about to learn,
that we've just gone through, vi eish
ba'oid remez ledayos, there's a remez in
this parsha for future generations. Ki
kol asher era Avinu and Esau achiv,
because everything that happened between
Avinu Yaakov and his brother Esau
will repeat itself and happen to us with
the descendants of Esau.
And the Torah is writing this parsha for
US TO KNOW HOW TO handle with Zera shel
Esau. So not only specifically we should
prepare for three things.
The three things that Yaakov Avinu
prepared that Yaakov Avinu himself
prepared for and that was tfilo
But either way says the Ramban that the
reason we have this parsha is not only
to know the life and times of Yaakov and
Esau. But it's also a message l'doros.
And if you go through the Ramban's
Pirush haTorah here and parshas
Yitzchak, this is an idea that he
repeats at least five times. He keeps on
coming back to this. Says you see THIS
PASUK, OH, THIS is why that happened
then and that's why that happened here.
It's like a history course around the
world in a few psukim here. If you go
through the Ramban here we
quoting different episodes that happened
between Zera shel Yaakov and Zera shel
Esau and it's based on this idea
And that's of course pshat in this
medrash. Pshat in this medrash is that
Rabbeinu
So what did he do? Have a
because he understood THAT THIS IS THE
BLUEPRINT of exactly how you're supposed
to handle with Esau. So if he wants to
know what should my next move be let's
learn another kineged, another
piece of raid. Let me take out something
else, another lesson to extrapolate from
this story. Because the more you
understand this story hafokh ba hafokhba
the more you're going to know how you're
supposed to interact with the Bnei Esau
for future generations. But I saw
in the Megadim Chadashim from my going
with David Weiss that it could be
there's a a little bit of an ink in that
matters. That Rabbeinu Kadav
have a mistake about
and specifically what
wise is addressing is that why is it
when
this idea specifically by Rabbeinu as in
Rabbeinu
and why specifically as it relates to
when Rabbeinu went and he dealt with the
mouth of Remy and he says the heck an
idea that we've spoken about many times
over the years in the read the in base
matters
and that is that the
in
pay said that we know
as in Rabbeinu
Rabbeinu is known as
why was he called
is it because he's
in
and the
was
Rabbeinu
was a
of and
being that he was a of that's why
Rabbeinu
is referred to as
Rabbeinu
Russia
in
the
the bottom says that when you understand
that you understand a mattress the
mattress says in parshas
the
how you
Rabbeinu lived in
for 17 years but you
and used to say about himself that
just like
lived in
for 17 years so too I lived in for 17
years what's the what
17 17 says the
it's possible IT'S THIS
BECAUSE RABBEINU HAS a very very close
linkage to Rabbeinu he's
Rabbeinu that's what stands for and just
like Rabbeinu lived 17 years in
so too Rebino Hakadosh lived 17 years in
Tzipori. Another two stops. The Gemara
says in Kesubos kuf gimel amud aleph
that Reb Yehuda Nasi, right before his
petirah, so he commanded his family a
whole bunch of things. One thing he said
was, "Yehei neir yehei daluk bimkomi. I
want that there should always be a a
light that's lit where I sit. Shulchan
yehei oruch bimkomi and mitos yehei
mutza'os bimkomi." Meaning, "I want you
to prepare my dollar amos as if I'm
still alive." Says Reb Nachman bar
Yitzchak, "He wasn't alive anymore.
What's the point?" So, the Gemara says
because kol beishasim she every bein
hashmashos Erev Shabbos have a atzilus
beisnei.
Reb Yehuda Nasi would come back home.
And because he would come back home
every Erev Shabbos to spend Shabbos with
the family. So, for that reason he said,
"Neir yehei daluk bimkomi, shulchan
yehei oruch bimkomi, mitos yehei
mutza'os bimkomi." If you take a look at
Reb Akiva Eiger in Gilyon Hashas on Eilu
Amarim Kesubos kuf gimel amud aleph, he
quotes from the Sefer Chassidim that the
Sefer Chassidim says that when Reb
Yehuda Nasi would come back for Shabbos
bigdei chamudos shoyei loveish
beShabbos. He would come home wearing
his Shabbos clothing. U poiter es
harabanim beKiddush hayom. And he would
make Kiddush and he would be motzi the
family with Kiddush. Belo keishar
meisim, not like other people that die,
sheheym chofshiim mitzvos, that no
longer are chayavim mitzvos and as a
result in halacha don't have the ability
to be motzi someone else with a mitzvah.
You have to be a mitzuvah voiseh to be
able to be motzi someone else that's a
mitzuvah voiseh. And the reason he was
able to do it is because he said, "He
can chayem u poiter um Kiddush." Because
a tzaddik never dies. Tzaddikim are
always alive and because they're always
alive u poiter um as Kiddush, they would
have the ability to poiter the Kiddush.
So, the Sefer Chassidim is bothered that
how was Rabbeinu Hakadosh allowed to go
ahead and be motzi the rabbonim,
l'chera, he was a meis. If he's a meis,
he's an einam mitzuvah voiseh, he
doesn't have the ability to poiter. The
Torah SAYS HE'S A TZADDIK AND tzaddikim
can be sossim acherim chayim and it's
for that reason it's going to be okay.
But, the Sfas Emes Hakadosh it in a
different shot is we know that Avinu was
loyal mace and if
was nothing
that means he wasn't
HE NEVER DIED THAT HE CAME DIED BUT
THAT'S
THAT TO BE
TO BE
NOW WHEN WOULD BE MANIFEST THAT YOU
COULD BE
BUT
IT'S NOT HE DIED BUT IT'S AS HE'S alive
he was LOYAL MACE HE'S
A
LOYAL MACE AND BY THE WAY TAKE A LOOK AT
THE AND THEN THE
and the and
both very much
talk about how this
is related to
loyal mace and that's why
he was called a
he's
called
he's the third of the others he's
considered which
but the bottom line is
he was able to go ahead and do this
he was loyal mace if that's the case
should also be allowed to do it because
is
another beautiful
there
brings is
the
say
alone mace
he got up from learning maces
he was learning
he was
learning
he was learning
he
was learning he was learning he was
learning he was learning he was learning
he was learning he was learning he was
learning he was learning he was learning
he was learning he was learning he was
learning he was learning he was learning
he was learning he was learning he was
learning
he was learning he was learning he was
learning he was learning he was learning
he was learning he was learning he was
learning he was learning he was learning
he was learning he was learning he was
learning he was learning he was learning
he was learning he was learning
he was learning he was learning he was
learning he was learning he was learning
he was learning
he was learning he was learning he was
learning he was learning he was learning
he was learning he was learning he was
learning he was learning he was learning
he was learning he was learning he was
learning he was learning he was learning
he was learning he was learning he was
learning he was learning he was learning
right? That close bond that we had is no
longer here anymore." He also was a
gilgul of somebody very famous. You know
he was a gilgul of He was a gilgul of
Esav Harasha. And in fact, the Megillah
says that's the pshat that when Rivka
has this very challenging pregnancy,
"Vatelech lidrosh es Hashem." So what
does the Novi say? The Novi says, "Shnei
bevitnech." "Al tikri ela
ge'im." Zeh Rebbi v'Antoninus. Rashi
quotes the Midrash Tanchuma. What's the
oimek? The oimek is because Yaakov and
Esav would one day be in the skalgul in
Rebbi and Antoninus. But the point is
Yaakov Avinu's neshamos
Rebenu Hakodesh's neshamos Yaakov Avinu.
And Antoninus is neshamos shel Esav. One
more remark in the Weiss tells us his
bekius in this piece is absolutely
staggering. But one more remark that he
brings here is that the Gemara says in
the Sifrei
Avodah Zarah daf yud amud beis. That's
where the Gemara details the
relationship between
Rebbi and Antoninus. So one of the
things the Gemara says is, "Kol yoma,
every day, have a meshamesh Rebbi,
Antoninus used to take care of Rebbi.
Machalei, he'd give him to eat. Mashkei,
he'd give him to drink.
When Rebbi wanted to go on his bed, have
a gochin kamai purya, so Antoninus would
bend down and he would tell Rebbi to
Right, on my way you would say, 'Sak
ilav layu depurya, step on top of me and
go on your bed.' So when Rebbi saw
Antoninus say that, he told him, "Lav
arav azulai b'malchus kulai ai, it's
inappropriate." Amalei Antoninus told
Rebbi, "Mi asi many matzi tachascha
l'olam haba? Asi be'avodah d'olam haba."
And if I'm going to do it in olam haba,
like this I'll be zocheh to be able to
do it in olam haba as well. The Baal
Shem Tov wrote
a sefer called Or Ha'olam. It's a
peirush on Yerushalmi. And in perek
daled of maseches Ma'aser Sheini, in his
peirush on Yerushalmi, Reb Dovid Weiss
says, "I found that he said that what's
the pshat that Antoninus was serving
Rebbi in this incredible way?" He said
because the Novi had told Rivka the Rav
Yavetz. The Maaseh you don't find
anywhere that Esav ended up serving
Yakov. You don't find it ever happening
during their lifetime. We just went
through pretty much the summation of
their encounter. Right? I mean Esav's
going to make a cameo appearance again,
but for the most part this is the story
of Esav. Where did it ever play itself
out that it was Rav Yavetz? It never
did. So said the Shevet Mussar, it was
important that Yakov and Esav be in a
Skol girl. And when they came back and
they were in a Skol in the form of
Rabbeinu Hakadosh and Antoninus, then it
was Rav Yavetz. Mach away. Masque away.
Have a Gochen Kame. Puria. Sakula Vayala
Puria. This was a Kium in this Inyan of
Rav Yavetz. Here is the bottom line.
What emerges is from the Torah of the
Megaleh Amukos and Oifen Pagemel is that
Rabbeinu Hakadosh was a Gilgul. He was
Nishmaso Shel Yakov Avinu. And Antoninus
was a Gilgul. He was Nishmaso Shel Esav
Harasha. So this wasn't just wasn't just
a Nasi of Klal Yisrael and a Melech of
Rome. The relationship between Rabbeinu
Hakadosh and Antoninus really traces
itself. It has its roots in the
relationship with Yakov and Esav. It's
actually interesting they got along
really really well. Which sounds like is
the end of the story of Yakov and Esav.
But the bottom line is and Rav Dovid
Weisz it's Poshut. That's the Oimek in
this Medrash. Rabbeinu had have a Solech
Lemalchusa that Rabbeinu Hakadosh when
he would go to the Melech of Rome. Who
is the Melech of Rome during the time
Rav Yehuda Nasi? For the most part it
was Antoninus. So this is Rabbeinu
Hakadosh going to Antoninus. What would
he do? Have a Mistakel Bad Parsha.
Parshas. He would go through this
Parsha. Why this Parsha? Because the
story of Yakov and Esav that the Ramban
says is Negaya L'Malchei Yisrael and all
Bnei Esav. But how much more so for been
Antonino's who themselves are Gilgulem
of Yaakov and Esau? And it's for that
reason of Megalitos this Indian
specifically when it comes to
specifically as it relates to his
relationship with Antonino's. But really
the whole episode just coming back
to wrap it up of the beginning of
like the says it's not just Yaakov.
It's not just
a story that took place but rather
of
Yaakov and Esau. Everything that
happened this entire story would play
itself out. It would play itself out in
the future generations.
The pinnacle of the story is when Yaakov
has it out with
how does that end? The way that ends is
it's a tough battle. It goes
they sweat it out literally.
Yaakov ends up being injured right? He's
limping right now Yaakov. He's going to
have a
but right now Yaakov is is still limping
the sciatic nerve right? Sciatic is very
painful. He's in a lot of pain right
now. So Yaakov right now is limping but
the end of the day at the end of the day
Yaakov made it out alive. It was
and if you take a if you take a look at
the
on that
the says this too is the mice of a
similar one and this too is prophetic
about what our relationship is going to
be with Yaakov and Esau. They're going
to hit us. They're going to bruise us.
They're going to gaze us. They're going
to do everything they can come up to
possibly do to try to harm us and
they're going to be very very successful
and there's going to be times throughout
Jewish history where the are going to be
limping but at the same time how does
the story of Yaakov and Esau end? By
and in the next year we're going TO SEE
YAAKOV IS ULTIMATELY GOING TO BE BECAUSE
THE end of the story is that everything
is going to play itself out exactly the
way it's supposed to play itself out.
We're going to end up being successful.
It's going to be a situation of
in
I think just to end with
of the
amidst of by the
why don't we eat? It's related to the
fact that Jacob was hurt in his good
that was by the
says the safe mission
of the show of this message get a shot
of the should be a reminder to the Jacob
even
if they're going to have to endure and
they're going to have to suffer terrible
big
throughout the
be out there I mean and specifically
over you but two shall we
they should be but two they should know
they're never going to be lost
ultimately this going to be a
ultimately at the end of the day the is
going to come and he's going to with
them
and then say and when the
are going to remember this
of
young Obama
will be
it's going to be a constant reminder a
constant reminder for the fact that even
though we're in
but we're going to make it out
what's the
because this of Jacob
he was
lucky
he wanted to uproot Jacob completely who
him and his children
he wasn't able to when you see him and
his children so say that he hit him
copy that's the lotion
right that's the of Jacob he tried
chopping with
and that's specifically
the place we went ahead and hit him the
Sarah
with
over
to them
she
has to
>> Just like you see the father, the tata,
Yakov Avinu, the sun shone for him and
he had a refuah then
and he was saved. Can you
So too the shemesh of mashiach is going
to rise from us and he will
and it's going to heal us and he will
and he will
be
Amen. That's exactly the way the safer
ends this piece.