Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
You
see your
tomorrow
[Music]
Okay. Hi everybody. Again, I apologize
for being uh for being late. Uh I have
three pages of announcements, but only a
few words per page. Uh number one,
praying for victory for aim and all the
fronts of the war as well as the lasting
unity of Ami Israel and for all of those
whose health has been affected by the
war. The safe return of all of our
hostages should be very very soon. Rafua
Schlma Borak Benfreda Bacha Batara and
again lasting unity and safety of
AmIrael safe return of the soldiers and
hostages. uh the full recovery of all
those who are wounded and shalom o
Israel aliat nama yishi alo ben ronit
rab aron ben mashulam the late husband
of Carol Stein and his yard site is the
eighth of a uh in memory of William
Furam
ben Shimon the father of Esther fyer
schnitzer his yard site is on the 10th
of A he came from Vienna after the
unulus without his family came to
America alone, joined the 82nd Airborne
to fight the Nazis, jumped into Normandy
on D-Day. So he left the war zone and
then rejoined uh as a soldier
participating in the uh defeat of the
Nazis.
Hashem uh then from Ari is a very dear
friend. Uh I know him as a little boy
who grew up in my bra. a very very fine
member of the Baltimore community and uh
recently his father was nifter so he
just said my parents were members of our
show in Silver Spring and Ryder would
spoke at both of their levas it would be
very meaningful to sponsor his share lei
nishmas s and Emil Bronn Sarah Basim
Salman Azriel bin Mosha Lezar um again I
could be Mar I could talk about I could
spend the whole year talking about them
they were a wonderful wonderful couple
they were their deaths were separated by
several years, but they absolutely were
pillars of the community in in Torahim.
Uh from my my st standpoint, very very
sorely missed.
Uh they left a wonderful wonderful
family uh behind. And finally, an
anonymous contribution was made for the
of our hostages to return safe and
totally healthy to their homes. Hashem's
protection for Kalisel for the gulma
vimera venu.
Um again obviously we're in the nine
days. Uh we are approaching the ninth of
a ninth of a is shabis Sunday. It is
still possible that we will be z to the
bin mikdash. uh and in that case we will
not have to fast on the 9th of AP the
9th of A will become a holiday a day of
joy and here I just want to point out uh
a preliminary
and that is kazal do teach us
>> I'm sorry okay
>> yeah kazal do teach us based on the puss
and zakaria
that when the gula comes all of the fast
days will no longer be fast days that's
fine but There will be days of joy.
Now one might wonder why does that
happen? I understand that once we have a
basikt there is no reason to be sad on
the 9th of A but why would the ninth of
Aav itself
become an especially joyous day? What
would make the 9th of A joyous when we
get back to Ba Miklas? Why would it be
more joyous than the eighth of a or the
eth of tes? And the short answer is that
it is the crying and the grieving that
we have over the
builds the bas mik. It is the very sense
of loss in which hashem sees how much we
yearn for his redemption. How much we
desire his presence that builds the basa
mikdash. So the very shedding of tears
in itself will be the source of the
gaul. The maral writes that is the
meaning of the famous mime kazal that
mashiach is born on tishabove.
It doesn't have to mean that the actual
birthday of mashiach will be on
tishabove. Maybe not. Maybe mashiach
will be born some other days. But it
means that the thing that brings
messianic redemption into the world is
the degree of mourning and yearning that
we connect through tishabove. And that
is why tishabove has a double character.
Do you know on one hand it is the
saddest day of the year. It's a day of
mourning, a day of crying, a day of
kinos. And at the same time we don't say
takan on tishab because it's considered
to be somewhat of a festive day. And in
fact there are many old men hugim some
of which are still practiced uh by
certain segments in which the afternoon
of tishab
certain activities are done besides the
fact you don't have to sit on a low
bench etc. But there were certain
minhagimay
that were connected to joy. For example,
there's an old min that women would
sweep and clean their houses tish
afternoon to honor the coming of
Mashiach.
There was even a minute brought down
which is actually against
but some gulam didn't want to stop it in
which women would wash their hair the
afternoon of tish in honor of Mashia.
Now that that is actually a very
controversial thing because according to
the you're not allowed to wash any part
of your body on the nth of soakly that
was improper but it reflected
the inner simka that gul is going to
come as a result of our you know even in
the kinos it's very interesting thing
that uh the kinos are of course the
lamentation poems
uh and without a translation It's very
very difficult. I mean, I remember as a
kid these old Kenos books. Uh they're
still around. Uh they're not even
numbered. So the keynotes are just
unbroken. It's like 150 pages of
unbroken text. And maybe maybe you know
I understood I mean I was relatively
young. I understood like every 10th line
I saw I I saw some thought that was
coming out of it. Uh so the first thing
is get a kynos book that's numbered
because it's really 45 poems. I mean
once you have a sense that it's 45 poems
it becomes manageable. So a numbering of
kynos itself is extremely valuable even
without a translation and then get
yourself a translation. We have heart
scroll is probably the best one. Uh
there are actually some very very
excellent Hebrew translations of Kenos
that one should get in which the very
difficult poetic words are given a more
straightforward translation and uh Kenos
has a number of authors but the main
author was the great great religious
poet Rabi Lazar Hakalier who wrote a lot
of the pim of rashana yam kiper sukus
rashesh most of it we don't even say but
it's in the makers certain and and the
like and Rabar Khal has a very very
complicated style. He brings in many
many midrussian
uh but unless you know the medish you
wouldn't know it from the kina. So the
commentaries have to tell you oh this is
based on this medish this is based on
this gamorrah this is based on this
teaching very very fascinating limit but
the point I want to make is this Rabi
Lazar composed probably 60 or 70 kenos
for tishab
but in our books only 20 of them made it
meaning some congregations said other
things but the standard kinos has 20
kinos of khal But if you look at the
very early Sedorim
for example the sitter of Rome called
the moxer of Roma going back to the
1300s
uh and that has all the kinos and
everything else. You actually find that
after you finished the kinoshal
wrote 11
pakim of like I'm not going to call it
kinos of that's a contradiction but 11
poems of comfort dealing with ga dealing
with mashiach
21 kinos of aos
and then 11 kinos
thank 11 kos
of called pure
and they were actually said tish above
morning and later some kahilos move them
to tish above afternoon and eventually
what unfortunately happened was they
dropped out entirely if you were to ask
me where can I find the pure nama well
rest assured I've been searching for it
a very long time uh I found it in
makaroma makaroma is like old old old
moxer that's on Hebrewbooks.org. I mean,
it's not you can't get it in a bookstore
or whatever it is. So, it's really a
little sad that this concept of pure
dropped out of tishab but l it's part of
it. Even if we don't say it, it is part
of it. And that's the idea that through
our mourning, through our yearning, we
become closer to God. You know there's a
famous expression I think I think it's
from Shakespeare uh absence makes the
heart grow foundonder
and of course by the way there is a a
theory that Shakespeare might have been
the equivalent of an English morano some
actually say Shakespeare might have
might have been Jewish uh even though
Jews were not allowed to live in England
at the time but he was like a hidden Jew
his portrayal of Shillock whatever
different I have a a friend I know in
West Hartford who's kind of obsessed
with the idea
of arguing that Shakespeare is Jewish
and he's written books on it and and and
and the like. Uh but absence makes the
heart grow foundonder. Some means the
paradox of life that sometimes the
further you are from someone,
the more passionate is your connection.
And therefore the three weeks and the
nine days and the ninth of
are all about feeling our distance from
God.
But as we feel our distance from God,
we're actually closer to him. He cries
with us. He cries over our separation
from him.
We cry over our separation from him.
And that crying creates a closeness.
One way of visualizing this is if you're
on a circular path and you're leaving
a certain point. As you get further and
further from that point, you actually
get closer on the other side. Right? I'm
moving away from a point, but I'm
getting closer there. That's what it is.
The paradox
of closeness through distance. Well,
Futner was one to ask when he made
aliyah or lived here for a while.
Is there anything someone had the ask
him is there anything he missed about?
And his response was he missed the
yearning to come to
cuz you know you take things for granted
right taking things for granted. When
you're invar that's when you have this
great yearning to come and the challenge
we have to have is to have that yearning
even when you're here already and that
is why tishabove will become
a festive day a joyous day because all
that we invest in the yearning to be
connected to God is going to be the
source of our joy is going to be the
source of our redemption. As Maral said
that is the meaning of Mashiach
being born on tisha on tishabove
you know there's a a very nice
observation
from Rabbi Salvichek maybe do salivic
in which he points out that if you look
at the trajectory
of private mourning if god forbid
somebody loses a a parent or a relative
so private mourning always starts off
very very severe
and gets progressively relaxed with the
passage of time. So the shiva is much
much stricter and then 30 days and for
most relatives that's the end of the aut
lenient.
So you start off very very strict and
you get progressively more lenient till
the ais vanishes.
When it comes to the public morning for
the bikdash
the opposite is the case because we
start off with the three weeks which are
relatively lenient. No haircuts, no
music, no weddings and even that's a
according to the law of the Garra.
There's virtually no morning at all
connected to the three weeks and then
you get the nine days and then you get
the week of the ninth of a which this
year there isn't because tishab is
Sunday but the week of the nth of is
more than even the nine days and then
you get
and the crescendo is then tish you see
the movement is the opposite when it
comes to private morning I go from the
kamur to the
when it comes to the morning over the B
mikdash I go from the cow to the kamur
why is that so so he said that's because
the function of the mourning is
different in the two cases when a person
suffers a private loss
normally they are devastated their life
is shattered they feel they have no way
of going on uh they feel they want to
give up their life sometimes so aut is a
gentle way of gradually acclimating you
to be able to resume your life. So for
seven days stay at home people come to
you and then la you put your toe in the
water you go out a little bit more a
little bit more
the laws of aas are very therapeutic
they're designed to give you a sense of
healing
in a gradual way so you could eventually
rejoin life.
That doesn't mean the pain ever
completely goes away. But what happens
in private ais hopefully hopefully is
that the pain becomes compartmentalized.
That's really how you go on with life.
Meaning yeah it's there. It's there but
you put it in a certain place and and
you're able to go on and you're able to
be productive.
That's extremely important. I'm not
going to say hala is all about
psychology. There are many many aspects
besides the psychological but there is
no doubt about it that hilosis is a very
very powerful psychological mechanism to
help people deal with loss loss because
of death and the like fact I remember
quite graphically
uh it was like it was in my sh but
before I became the rabbi like the week
before I was going to be the rev of a
shaw um a man who had married a
non-Jewish woman and had a son from that
non-Jewish woman. So, the son was a guy,
but the son converted.
The son tragically died at the age of of
10 or whatever it would be. So, it was a
bit of an awkward was the first Levia
that I had to officiate in in my shell
and it was kind of an awkward situation.
The mother is not Jewish, etc.
Yeah. And the one thing I remember very
very vividly and know of course
obviously I I spoke to the mother too
but I remember that at the end of the
funeral
and it was a little sad and I still feel
guilty that I didn't do more uh the
father sat down beginning Shiva and
people surrounded the father and they
remember that the mother was all by
herself and she simply because you know
Shiva was not her ritual per se and
she was leaving, you know, she just
left. You know, that was the end. It was
a funeral. It was the end of her son's
funeral and that was it.
And it made me realize besides the
halas, of course, she doesn't have to
sit Shiva. That's not the issue. Uh
she's a non non-Jew, but the idea is
that how therapeutic Shiva is. Now,
that's the private mourning. With the
public morning, it's exactly the
opposite. We don't need to be taken out
of our devastation.
How many of us, and I include myself,
are so devastated over the loss of the
Basa Mikdash that I can't go on. Right?
I'm thinking that would be a new excuse
a yeshiva student could offer why he
didn't come to Davening. Uh I couldn't
come. I couldn't come to Davening this
morning. I couldn't get out of bed. I'm
overwhelmed with the destruction of the
base mikash. I can't move.
Well, try that. But, you know, it's not
going to work so much. I mean, I I read
a rabbi once recounted that um he saw
some members of who were extremely very
very sad during the nine days.
And he went over to them and said, "I
know this is a such a sad time, but
bezras Hashem, there will be gula. There
will be redemption."
And they said something like, "Well,
we're really upset over the Yankees
losing the game yesterday."
Uh, or another story, this is a actually
a very, very great story. This was
written by um an Orthodox university
student in Germany in the 1800s. 1800s
like you know there were unlike Russia
Poland there were Orthodox Jewish
students who attended universities that
was our Persian Shita Torah.
So uh he he has a Jewish roommate, two
Jews, two Orthodox Jews and Tishabove is
a long afternoon.
So they're playing chess again. I mean
you know I can't blame them. It's a long
afternoon. So, uh, they're playing
chess, waiting for the fast to be over.
And as they're in the middle of their
chess game on Tishabove, there's a knock
on their door.
And who's at the door? Their Protestant
German professor, very rigid, tall,
thin, ramrod thin, wearing a black suit,
very devout Christian.
And the person says to them, he says, "I
am so sorry to come to you on your day
of bereiement,
on your day of sorrow, but I just want
you to know that God will bring you
redemption
and you should not cry anymore because
good times are going to come." And the
this person writes later, he says, "He
was so embarrassed. He was so
embarrassed because this professor
obviously felt much more strongly about
tishabuff
than they felt and he took from them. He
says they were just waiting, you know,
the fast was long. They were just
waiting for the fast to be over. So
they're playing chess to kill some time
and here you have a man who is broken up
with grief over the suffering of the
Jewish people. So the point is going
back to Abselves, I'm just adding some
stories as I go on. Going back to Absel
of Aging, we don't need to be taken out
of our grief.
We need to be put into our grief that
maybe by gradually increasing our
restrictions and our limitations
perhaps will move into a sense of loss.
We don't need to be taken out of our
loss in which in which case you go from
the to the cow. We need to go get into
our loss in which you go from the cow to
the kamore and Rafik says that is why
the trajectory of AOS moves in that
particular particular direction. Okay.
So uh some something to think about. We
just don't know. You know the Gmorrah
the medish the medish in is the book of
lamentations and there's a whole medish
on the book of lamentations. You know,
the ninth of Aav is a day in which we're
not supposed to learn regular Torah
subjects because that brings us joy and
happiness. But there's a lot of stuff we
can learn. We can learn about the we can
learn the book of the book of Job. Uh we
can learn a we can learn the med of a we
can learn in the Gmorrah the stories
about the base mikdash. You can even
learn the laws of mourning the laws of a
uh right those things are permitted. So
in med actually gives a story
that rebanan
would recount I don't remember the
numbers but he would recount
many many many when he would go over the
destruction of the temple he would
recount many many bad events
now the garra I'm sorry not the medish
asked the question raud hanasi
who is much closer to the
he would recount many fewer events. So,
how could it be that Raokan who was
later remembered not well he didn't
remember personally but he was able to
record many more tragic events than Rebi
and the Medish gives a very powerful
answer he says Rebi was so close to the
that as he was recounting the events it
broke him up after he just said a few
events
he became so distraught he was not able
to go
Rabi Yokohan already had enough distance
that he was able to tell a more complete
story without breaking up. Rebi could
not give the whole story.
Those of you well I mean those of you
that have uh parents or or family or
grandparents by now who survived the
Holocaust, who were in concentration
camps, uh it's very very common. All
kids who grew up with Holocaust
parents know how the parents very rarely
I'm generalizing but for the most part
they very rarely talked about their
experiences to their kids simply because
they couldn't they couldn't the pain was
so great they couldn't allow themselves
to go there wouldn't be able to go on
demedish describes that is what
Rudahanazi was like that he he only
started describing it and he broke
Ravioan was able to be more clinical and
go over all of these things.
So it's an interesting point that
tishabove is of course about mourning
about ais but another aspect that we
sometimes pay a little less attention to
is tishabove is also about chuva.
It's about repentance
and returning to God. In fact, it's
interesting if I could be a little
historical here as well. You know, if
you look in the the very earliest
sitters that we have, the Sidurim of
Ravaja Gaon
and Raon, which is a little later and
these are Sidurum that come from the
800s or the 900s way before Rashi, you
know, and the like. You actually see a
fascinating thing that the lurggical
addition that they used to say in tisha
was not kinos. They did not in the s of
sadone. There are no kenos for tishov.
But what are there solos
prayers for forgiveness with the 13 like
like we say before rashash shana and
during muva. In other words, solos was
the original prayer of ninth of a with
the 13 principles of mercy which
highlights that tishabove was seen as a
day of chuva returning to god but it's
ultimately very much connected because
there is a passage in the talmi that
says
every generation
in which the ba mikdash is not rebuilt
is as guilty as the generation
in which the BA mikdash was actually
destroyed.
Meaning, you might have thought, well,
those earlier generations were very
sinful and bad, so God destroyed the
temple. We're not so bad. We don't have
the merit to get it back, but but you
know, we certainly wouldn't have caused
its destruction. That's a mistake. What
the to shi is saying is if you don't get
back the basa mikdash
it is as if you are actively destroying
it. It's being destroyed.
It's being destroyed. It's as if the
basikdash is being destroyed every
single day. Now why is that an important
thought? Because when khazal say the
temple was destroyed because of x y and
z
that has to mean that the x y and z is
still here.
Because if the x y and z is not here
if we would not be guilty of the same
aos
that caused the basik even if we're not
so righteous. In other words, you don't
have to be righteous to get the temple
back. You simply have to remove the
reasons
that caused its destruction.
Right? So, so when say the B mikdash was
destroyed because of and we'll we'll go
over the because of in a minute.
It's a because of that's now. It's not
only a because of that's then. So, in
this connection, let me go over some of
the uh the very well-known kazal and add
a few comments.
Let's first talk about the two reasons
that are given. I mean there are more
than two but I'm going to focus on two
reasons that are given for the
destruction
of the first B mikdash on the 9th of A
by the Babylonians
and that is reason number one are the
worst of aos they were guilty of a desor
idolatry
gilarayas sexual immorality
in murder the worst of the worst of the
worst these are the three aos which A
Jew must give up his life before he
transgresses.
And the first B mikdash was
because of
but then there's another
which
seems to be much less of a sin.
The first BA mikt was destroyed. the
first and it's clearly the first that
it's talking about because they didn't
recite
the braos
before Torah learning.
It doesn't say they didn't learn, they
learned. They didn't recite the braos
over the Torah learning.
So the question is number one,
okay, that's not that's not hically
proper. But the truth is there is a
makus. The Ramban says there's a Torah
commandment to say before you learn
Torah. Most opinions say it's only
anyway. But is that such an a for which
there'll be a Bikash? And number two,
why does the Gammorrah have to identify
the seemingly lesser a
of not making blessings over the Torah
when you have the absolute worst of the
worst of the worst?
I mean you're telling me they did the
worst and then you add on a smaller vera
and they didn't watch my makronum you
know you wouldn't you wouldn't you
wouldn't combine them in that way why
are they combined
so the great balusra of lapyan
offers a very fascinating explanation
reconciling these two things and that is
the actual aos were auror
But when asked the question inim
or actually when the puss says why was
the land destroyed and God has to answer
they didn't say the blessings over the
Torah this is a question on top of the
question and that is the following we
believe that Torah elevates a person
Torah spiritualizes a
Torah brings a person closer to God. So
the question is this, how could Jews who
learn Torah
be guilty?
sin. We know what the sin is.
But the question is how do they come to
that sin? I mean an example I'd give you
uh is let's say you you're learning in
yeshiva and you have a very good morning
seder 4 hours of concentrated learning
then you have an hour break or an hour
and a half break. So you go into town,
you do some rapes, pillagages, bank
robberies and murders, but you make it
back in time for afternoon seder.
Unfortunately, the well not not in the
world, but but I'm saying but actually
sometimes that is actually the portrait
of these serial murderers. They they
kind of have a a normal life uh and then
they they do their killings in the
breaks. But
>> yeah, well yeah, Asa might be an
example. But the question is, doesn't
the Torah do anything to you? How can
you learn for four hours and then rape,
pillage, and murder in your break?
So this is where
comes in as explaining that even if you
learn, it's not going to change him. Do
you remember the beginning of
in the beginning of David towards the
end of his life is shivering. He is
cold.
He is being covered with blankets and
the blankets do not give him warmth
and kazal say why was he punished with
the blankets not giving him warmth
because he didn't treat clothing with
disrespect when when sha is pursuing him
and at one point sha went into a cave to
relieve himself he left his coat his
cloak outside and David Melik was close
enough to kill him but he cut off a
piece of the cloak and then he showed
Sha from a from a from a hilltop. You
see, I was this close to you and why do
you look at me as your enemy? But Khazal
say the cutting of the garment was a
sin. And he who treats clothing with
disrespect
will not get benefit from clothing. The
clothing will not give him warmth.
Things you treat with disdain, things
you treat with disrespect,
you will not get benefit from.
So if uh a wife sees her husband
throwing around his clothes, you know,
she could tell him this this.
So Revelia says, if it's true that if
you treat garments with disrespect,
the garments will not give you benefit.
If you treat the Torah with disdain,
the Torah will not elevate you. It will
not sanctify you. So the concept of not
making blessings over the Torah
means they didn't treat the Torah as a
gift. They learned Torah because they
felt they had to, but they didn't feel
it was precious enough that it merited
Abra. So Rellia's point is when the
Gomorrah says the B mikdash was
destroyed because they didn't make
blessings over the Torah, it doesn't
mean that that was the sin that caused
the destruction. The actual sin that
caused the destruction was a zara.
But how could they be capable of those
sins if they were learning Torah?
Answer, their attitude towards the Torah
was not one of gratitude, love, respect.
And therefore, the same way if you treat
garments poorly, the garments don't give
you warmth. If you don't love and
respect the Torah, the Torah will not
change you. And therefore, yeah, you
could have a good morning seder and then
rape, pillage, and murder in the hour
and a half in the afternoon. Now, this
is uh actually sadly an important
message for us, and that is obviously a
Jew has to keep the mitzvot. That's for
sure. But we have to endeavor in our
lives to keep the mitzvot with
enthusiasm,
with joy, with passion, to look at them
as a gift and a privilege
and not a burden. Because if we look at
them as burdensome,
it's not going to change us. It's not
going to elevate us. It's not going to
transform us. just like
they were capable of doing.
So this attitude is a very very big
deal. Uh again it's you know Feinstein
you know there's an old saying
so hard to be a Jew and Ravosha
Feinstein used to say maybe with some
exaggeration that that ruined a whole
generation of the children of European
immigrants because if the message that
they hear over and over again is how
hard it is to be a Jew then when they're
in a free country they can think well
why do I have to be one I'm hearing
every single day how hard it is. uh
pesar and shabasar and of course in
those days when when the saying
originated it originated at a time in
the United States when it was very hard
to be a Jew much harder than the Harvard
undergraduates who are crying because
okay well okay
I mean it's not I I I have Rahman but I
I do have Rahman for what college
students are going through uh on
American campuses u but you know okay
it's not the Holocaust it's not it's not
the Holocaust and it's not even what
Jews went through in the 1920s when they
couldn't get jobs and and the like. So,
as difficult as things might be, uh,
when the saying it's hard to be a Jew,
was coined, it was very hard to be a
Jew. And yet, Mosha Feinstein said that
kind of poisoned the message
that was being communicated to the next
generation. And that is why the children
of the uh World War I post World War I
uh uh immigrants largely became
non-religious
almost 100%. I mean you're talking about
maybe a very very small percentage
remained faithful. That that's called
the lost generation. that generation of
the children of the World War I,
preWorld War I slightly post World War I
uh almost have no affiliation. They're
not even reformed. I mean, basically at
some point they got intermarried and
they have disappeared
from Judaism. Uh that's why young
Israel, you know, people like in the
world in particular, people like to
knock or Yes, knock young Israel. Uh but
one has to recognize the vital role that
young Israel played in reclaiming a
small percentage of those youth. I mean
uh young Israel started precisely in
that period of time because the older
Scholes were European immigrants etc.
And the young generation just weren't
going to those synagogues at all. And
young Israel created uh congregational
singing. They created more
controversially social dancing. Okay, I
don't want to get into the justification
of it, but they created different
mechanisms that with all of its failures
managed to bring at least a small number
of people to be religious and observant
Jews, passing it over to the next
generation. So, young Israel has a very
an extremely important role in what you
might call pre-ashiva America, meaning
after World War II, it was a different
type of thing. Then many yeshivots were
started. Kolum were started uh etc. But
prior to World War II there was there
were a few. There was Torvidas and there
was um uh Wuh but not that many and
there weren't that there were not that
many day schools for sure on the
elementary level. So Young Israel was
one of the main things that kept
orthodoxy alive. So even though people
like to knock it, in fact I know a rabbi
kind of a modern Orthodox rabbi who told
me with some truth, some sad truth, he
says the sign of his success
is when his students no longer talk to
him because he's too modern. Uh meaning
like he made them religious
but then they go to yeshiva and they
become you know so observant. Huh that
guy, you know, I'm not going to talk to
him. He's too modern. So he said, "I
know that I'm successful when they don't
talk to me anymore." Right? And that's
uh Young Israel is kind of that way.
Young Israel produced many many
religious Jews, but now for many of the
people that it produced, they say Young
Israel is too uh too modern or not not
religious enough uh for for me. Okay.
Um but okay, I don't want it
autobiographically. I mean the truth of
the matter is I myself as a young person
was guilty of this to some degree and I
myself as an older person suffered from
it in the other direction. So what goes
around comes around uh as the saying
goes I experienced uh to this day uh
people who will not talk to me because
I'm too modern and I was guilty of that
behavior when I was younger. So it's
it's interesting mid mida in that in
that particular way. Okay. Now those are
the two aots
that are connected to the of the first
temple of the first temple
and then
now I just want to add a certain thing
though
how well I know how we we can relate to
the second idea because that that's the
idea of passion and joy in divine
service but how do I relate to the first
idea meaning okay
maybe there's a lot of stuff in my life
I got to correct but I don't worship a
vodara
I don't do gilorayas
I don't do meaning what is the utility
of thinking about those aot
if those are not the aot that we're
doing
which I'll get to okay that of course
for sure there's a lot to work on there
but is there a is there any type of
connection I have to the aos of
so the truth of the matter is it may be
so that in a very literal sense we're
not guilty of those sins
but in a symbolic way we actually are
for example kazal say anyone who gets
angry is as if they are worshiping idols
right so anger is considered to be a
form
And as the balatana explains, that is
because if you're angry, you're not
believing that God is running the world.
Cuz who are you angry at? I'm angry at
you because you hurt me. But if I
believe that nothing comes to me unless
God decreed it. Then how can I be angry
at you? Am I angry at God? Then I'm
denying that, you know, God makes
decisions that are righteous. So anger
is a vodora.
Humiliating someone
is described as murder and we talked I
think last week about the negative power
of speech to destroy a person and guilas
even if a person doesn't have sexual
intercourse with someone but we
certainly are you know bombarded
with all sorts of sexuality in
advertisements on the internet social
media and the like and kazal actually
say here hura Improper sexual fantasies
can be even more injurious than sexual
behavior. So lisa maybe we're not guilty
of these aos in the most literal way.
But there are many aspects of these
averos that we still struggle with even
today. We struggle with anger. We
sometimes let our words humiliate
people, hurt people, crush their spirit.
And then there are sexual fantasies that
go in the wrong direction and the like.
So yeah, we do have a shas we do have a
connection to a gay.
But there's maybe a deeper point in
which we're still connected to those aos
and that is Rav Saddok actually explains
that these aos are symptoms
of deeper spiritual illnesses
and even if I don't have the symptoms
I may have the illness
a asymptomatic
illness we know that Peryos tells us
that the three Great destroyers of
spirituality
is kina which is jealousy
which is lust
and kavote a desire for honor and ego
gratification
says what
they take a person out of the world they
destroy your world. So here's Rabuk's
correlation.
Jealousy when it manifests itself in its
extremity
could lead to murder.
Indeed, uh most murders if you factor
out terrorism and war obviously if
you're talking about just criminal
murders uh tend to be not to strangers.
They tend to be people that you know.
It's often a family fight uh in which
someone is jealous of something
sometimes jealous of someone's sneakers
or whatever it would be they murder. So
once again
even if I'm not aim
but kina is the shyish of
so I may have that root that I have to
work on. uh tya is lust obviously that
is the shyish of giloas.
Now cavote is the shyish of idolatry.
That's that's a little more subtle. But
here the message is what is idolatry?
Anything that you elevate in your life
above the worship of God.
Right? So if a person elevates their ego
and their comfort above serving God,
they're guilty of idolatry.
Who's what idol are they serving?
They're serving themselves. There's
something called self idolatry. So Rab
Saddak's argument is that even if I'm
not guilty of the technical aa of a
zara,
I have ego in ga. Even if I'm not guilty
of the technical agile,
I have tyas.
Even if I'm not guilty of the literal
sin of
I'm guilty of jealousy. So when I go
through and I connect to the of the and
I think about the reasons for the
what is my job to try to rectify
those reasons. And as we said, once
enough of us try to work to eradicate
those reasons, the temple gets rebuilt
automatically. You don't need a special
merit for the beta mikdash. You simply
need to correct the flaws that caused
the so reflections or meditations that
we can think about in connection to the
first bas.
We now come to the second basin mikdash
and very very very very sadly it
actually is a much easier
not easier to do but it's more obvious a
much more obvious
to make cuz I'll say that the second bas
destroyed by the Romans exactly 490
years after the destruction of the first
490 day
9th of a late afternoon most of the
temple actually burnt on the 10th of of
but they the Romans set fire to it late
afternoon of the 9th above which by the
way is interesting paradox I'll just
throw this out for you to think about I
had mentioned before that after Mina is
when is a little more lenient and we
reduce some of the mornings.
If you think about it, based on when the
temple was actually destroyed,
one could have made the opposite
argument that the yut should intensify
after Mina because it's after Mina that
the actual temple was being burnt. Okay,
I'll leave that as a question to ponder.
were more makeo
but in terms of the history of it after
was this of the actual
base.
So here say that if the first temple was
destroyed because of
the second temple was destroyed because
of
needless groundless
irrational hatred between the Jewish
people.
Josephus
who wrote a history. Josephus was
literally an eyewitness testimony uh an
eyewitness to all of this all of this.
And Josephus is a controversial figure.
He was a Jew. On the other hand, he's
kind of like Benedict Arnold. He went
over to the Roman side and he's actually
writing this history from his vantage
point on the Roman side of things. But
he claims and you know again I don't
dismiss his claim entirely that he was
trying to protect and defend the Jewish
people from the other side and again
he's complicated. I I think there is
some truth to that. on the other hand uh
he was living in Titus's house as
Titus's house guest you know so it's a
little little difficult to reconcile
everything of someone who was a very
complicated character but he actually
records and in light of Kazal I think
this is an accurate recollection
that there were waring factions of Jews
who were fighting against each other for
control of the city and they were
shooting arrows from opposite sides of
the basikt over the heads of the kohanim
who were ducking the arrows in order to
bring the corbanos in the last weeks of
the basikt
and he quotes Titus Titus who was the
general who later became emperor but
Titus was the Roman general
who ordered the destruction of the
basiktas Titos right the kinos talk
about Titos entering the keshak dashim
that Titus said Josephus quotes him as
saying you know Maybe we don't have to
destroy the temple. If we just hang
around long enough, the Jews are going
to destroy it themselves.
Now, any quote that Josephus says, you
have to take with a grain of salt. But
the truth of the matter is in light of
this actually makes sense. That was the
situation. Now, the big problem with is
who hates for no reason? I mean I I mean
I if I ask anybody are you in favor of
says no I don't believe I should hate
people for no reason but the people I
hate I have plenty of good reason for
I mean who who is going to have
right I hate this person he's the arab
he's a moik he's an enemy of Torah I
hate this person because he's parasite.
He doesn't participate in the defense of
the Jewish people. You'll notice I'm
being an equal opportunity uh disperser
of of hate. Uh that's notam. I got a
real good reason.
The answer ultimately is
that even the reasons that we think are
good
are not valid. They're not valid. You
don't hate. You disagree.
You argue the point, you discuss, you
debate. Of course, um avat doesn't mean
you roll over and compromise
fundamental principles.
Jews have a very long tradition of
arguing. That is what the Babylonian is
about. And of course even before the
tomat we argue we discuss we debate
sometimes we compromise
and sometimes we can't compromise.
That's 100% true
but that doesn't mean it degenerates
into hatred.
I can look at a person or I should look
at a person even if their ideology is
totally different than mine and I can
deeply believe their ideology is flawed
and erroneous and even dangerous
but I can still respect their integrity
of trying to find
a good way in life even if they're
mistaken
and this is a very important avod which
is very difficult
particularly in this in the state of
Israel
which you separate the idea from the
person
just like Bura told Rabbi Mayor hate the
sinner I'm sorry hate the sin and not
the sinner
I can hate the idea or or learn from it
either way that doesn't translate
in hating the person
and
of course doesn't just mean active hate
It also refers to coldness.
It refers to indifference.
It refers to clickishness.
It refers to the idea that we have our
group, whoever our group is. And if
you're not in our group,
you don't quite count.
It exists on all levels of politics
and it exists in children's playgrounds.
Goes from
the highest levels of power
to the lowest levels of the classroom or
the playground.
Someone told me a story
of um
kind of a very religious kindergarten
that was right next door to I think a
secular kindergarten public school
kindergarten.
I mean and there was a chain link fence
separating the two playgrounds.
But what happened would be that kids
would talk to each other between the
links.
So the school decided to put a big heavy
black tarp
over the fence so there couldn't be any
communication
between them.
Okay. I I mean listen I I I don't want
to be guilty of sin myself. This is puts
me in a very uncomfortable role because
I I can understand the argument.
Bad influence is statue. 5-year-old star
5-year-old bad influence. Okay, bet.
But at the same time, what's the message
that's being communicated?
These are not real Jews. These are not
kids you should ever be connected to.
I've mentioned a million times so please
forgive me for mentioning it a million
and first the mishamay
as water reflects the face that you show
the water.
So too the heart of man
reflects that which you show.
And uh the meaning is I look into water.
Whatever face I show the reflecting
water is the face that I see. I smile at
the water. I get a smiling face. So too
I show a person love, respect,
legitimation,
validation.
They're going to feel that way about me.
I communicate to them that they're
nothing or they're a malik or whatever.
they will feel those negative feelings
about me. Part of why religious secular
conflicts never get diffused in Israel,
other places too, is precisely because
each side looks at the other
as a demon.
So you look at me as a demon, that's how
I'll look at you and it gets worse and
worse and worse and worse.
If on the other hand we could look at
each other with respect and even with
love
then we would get that love back too.
Now people say well let the other side
start with that. Why do I have to start
with that? They should start with that
and then I'll respond. The answer is
like same thing with marriage right
there's always the case you know
marriage counselors say do this is well
why do I have to do let let the let her
do it first. The answer is somebody has
to be the adult in the room. That's the
way life is. Somebody has to start.
Somebody has to be the adult. And if you
are a believer in Torah and you are a
believer that these are the imperatives
of a Torah Jew, then you start you make
the first gesture in whatever way you
can make that gesture. So I had to fetch
a little bit to explain how is
relevant for us even today and you know
hopefully I shared with how it is but
very very sadly very tragically I don't
have to really explain how
is relevant today because it is very
very very obvious
that we have it we We have it. It's
infected us.
It's killing us in many, many ways. For
a short time,
a few months after October 7,
the great dark day of great tragedy to
the Jewish people.
But the silver lining in that tragedy
was that for a short time we seem to
have been overcoming
all of those blockages to our unity.
If you remember before October 7,
remember before October 7, uh Israel is
being torn apart
by and people don't even remember this
although it's coming back a little bit,
judicial reform. NO's proposals for
judicial reform. Now that sounds like a
no an academic political issue. You have
to remember uh people were talking about
businesses were talking about leaving
the country. Uh there were some people
on the left who were talking about civil
war.
They looked at this as something your
mama would make a civil war over. Uh
there were soldiers in or in Miluim
who were threatening not to report to
me.
They did report but some have said I
don't know that maybe that emboldened
kamas into thinking there there would
not be a response. You know it's like
the kumar says the later sorrowos make
you forget the earlier sorrows. People
don't realize the turbulence that was
existing in Israel before October 7
domestically.
Then October 7 happened on Simasa
and then we realized you know we better
stick together or we will as uh Ben
Franklin said we have to hang together
or we'll be hung separately
and for a while there was a shining
period amidst the great tragedies of war
in which religious secular we all came
together because we were facing a common
enemy that was trying to destroy destroy
us and we have to be together
because there are not too many others
that are for us in the world.
But what happens is as the war goes on
and on and on and on and people get
exhausted
and when people get exhausted they
revert back to their old habits.
And therefore, unfortunately,
there's been a resurgence once again of
the
we had thought maybe we had gone beyond,
but not yet. We're not yet beyond it.
Which really compounds a tragedy on top
of a tragedy.
the tragedy, the war, the hostages,
all of the families that have been
dislocated, all of the that have died,
the also the hostages that have died and
the great heartbreak in so many
families.
But the tragedy on top of that is and
we're still stuck
with those mindsets
of
that are preventing the rebuilding of
the basiktas that are preventing the in
gathering of the exiles that is
preventing the coming of Mashiach.
So
tragically it is very easy to kind of
identify how we need to think about
in this in this context.
So it is a day of mourning
a day of feeling the distance from God
but through that distance we feel
closeness to Hashem as he cries with us.
But it's also a day of resolution,
a day of chuva, a day of looking at the
reasons for the and mikdash and trying
on our own individual level to try to
fix it up. And this is the meaning of
the idea that says every person
has to rebuild the basa mikdash. But how
does that work?
By trying to fix up the defects in my
own character, I'm adding a brick to the
celestial basa mikdash. So if I add a
brick and you add a brick and you add a
brick, eventually we have enough bricks
that the third mikdash will be
hashim.
So may it be God's will that even this
year we could bean
if
not may this be the last 9th of A that
will be day of sadness and mourning. May
we be za that it should be the great day
of redemption the day that Mashiach is
born the day that we experience the
gula.
You might
see your
body
[Music]