0:00 / 0:00
Rav Shlomo Luria (1510 – November 7, 1573) Chochmos Shlomo
61 views
• Visit the Rav's site: https://www.rabbidg.com/ • Have a Question? Contact the Rav: https://www.rabbidg.com/contact • Order Rabbi Glatstein's Books: https://www.rabbidg.com/rabbi-glatstein-books
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
was born in brisk in poland which is now
uh today it's russia in 1510 he was
nifter you'd based kislee 1573.
here at the cover evan mikiritizak
vitega
the stone cries out from the wall
the tega and hayam and the downtrodden
are wearied kinafal abir haroyam the
chiefest of all the shepherds has fallen
virgo nagainam the
greatest scholar of scholars
here sinai refers to his wide knowledge
of torah of haram and his penetrating
analysis the author of the yam shel
well
the maharsha as he's known had
prestigious lineage that traced all the
way back to rashi
he was related to many of their
abundance times the rama maran padua
he studied under his father avichyal
under his mother's father abitra kleiber
and he became the son-in-law of kalman
habibirkistan now ravcom and
was a great balmoifes if you look in the
state for sham
you'll see that there was a a blood
libel that was actually created by the
yeshua elim
normally we know of it
christian blood libels it was created by
the ishmaelim and the entire jewish
community was in mortal danger well
we're calling themus with kleinemus
kamen the founder of the marshall
it was shabbos
but in order to save the jewish people
he
he used kabbalah and he darwin and the
child came back to life and the child
said the arabs killed me
but how did he use this kabul he had to
write certain shame ice
so when he was nifter he writes that
when i die
you should stone my kever as the kapara
but this is
common habbikistan the father-in-law of
the amsterdam now
the quran was common was rashiba in lava
and oyster
and the amsterdam succeeded his
father-in-law and oyster
and was then a raven rashiban brisk and
then he became the rashashiva in lublin
what about the rav no
shalom
sun
rabbisra was the rav and the marshal was
the russia shiva
now some of the greatest
of his era were his tamidem the lavush
the sma
rebecca and ben bitsala the brother of
prague and there is even a tradition
that the maharal himself was a student
of the amsho
his talmud was ravmosha moss but moshe
moss the mate maisha who records the
manhagem of the marshall now the yamashi
shulma was a trailblazer and unique in
his halachic reproach
approach and that is he refused to just
accept the
the sukim and the views of the old
masters of the rishonim that's not how
he operated he would look at the gemara
he would start from the gemara and see
which approach is the most reasonable
just because someone earlier said an
approach that didn't automatically mean
that was correct
he would not hesitate to argue on the
base yosef or even the rambam we
mentioned ravshalm shachna continued the
system of pilgrim of
palak while the marshall vehemently
disagreed with that system and opposed
that system
and
he preferred the plain meaning of the
talmudic
discussions
now the yamcha
was especially interested in determining
the correct text of the gemara and the
reshinam that was the that was like the
starting point for him not the logic of
the gemara not the halal what is the
correct text of the gemara and he would
often criticize his predecessors for
working off inaccurate texts in fact he
would criticize sometimes the basis
basically they've said
but it wasn't based on an accurate text
he would he would mention that
so he set out to establish the
correctness of the
text now
the marshall is in the back of the
gemara as well by the marshal
it's sometimes difficult to comprehend
first of all many of the publishers
truncated his comments and condensed
them
many of his amendations are already
incorporated in our text in the gemara
so sometimes it's hard to understand
what is the marshall in fact adding
and uh but the
marshall did not approve of shalom
shachna's texts and notes on the the
correct gersta in the gemara
so marshall also challenged he wrote
responsa he wrote a super commentary on
rashi called urious shloimai he wrote a
liturgical poem for shabbos he wrote a
pay rosh on the poem he wrote a
kabbalistic interpretation of psalm 67
of tehelem
and he arranged it in the form of a
menorah and he wrote a whole commentary
about the significance of this psalm
it's a psalm we say after many mitzo
especially
now the marshal had a very strong
personality
so he mentioned he did not accept
shakhna's amendations of shas he did not
agree with the system of pilpal
but
he was an exceptionally humble man right
the marshal had his own personal
own personal maggid who before he would
go to bazin every day this mahgod would
come and give him musar and reprimand
him and tell him his great acharyas and
marshall would sit before him like a
student that sits before his rebbe
as strong of a personality as he was he
was very complimentary of his younger
kinsmen and relative the rama
however his friendship with rama did not
deter him from criticizing rama he
didn't agree with the fact that there
must studied philosophy secular studies
and he did not like the fact that when
the rama wrote chuvas in the opinion of
the amstelman the ramo did not use
correct grammar
drama defended himself by saying he's
using
accepted idioms despite the fact that it
was not the proper grammar
however in later years the relationship
of the amsterdam rama became so much
strained because the rama wrote a safer
terrorist katas and in the tarshata
constantly consistently and strongly
challenged and argued with the amsterdam
somo
wrote back against rama in his
commentary to hulen now this is very
interesting it's something i was not
aware of some soifer writes in his
haskama to the safer tsai alabanian
something wondrous about the marshall
says of samsoy for the wisdom of
shloimai the wisdom of marshall
surpassed his predecessors
the earlier editions of shaas including
the lublin edition where malaya
kimshainen and the taiyos were full of
mistakes and thorns and this going
painstakingly sifted and corrected and
cleaned and cleansed the text of shas
made it making it a usable document
however human capacity is limited so
because he exerted so much effort to
correct the right text of shas he added
a small amount of hiddushem
it's enough it was daeloy that he
corrected the shas the marshal was able
to come along then
and he had a completely clean shot like
a shokhan
and now he was able to dig into a
perfected chasse but you should know
says some safer there are a few
massacres that marshall was not able to
correct you didn't get it get to me
rice ah now that marshall comes
can't dig in
because it's not accessible
and the reason is the revolution wanted
to show the world that without the
marshall we don't have a shots
so he left over two massacres to show
that while everyone's able to dig into
the massachusetts marshall cleaned the
massachusetts did not get to even the
marshall was not able to penetrate to
the same depth
well says the
first something i was not aware of
that most of the times where the martial
questions in marshall you can answer up
very easily that's what some server
writes
the marshall did not agree with the
basics formula we know the sheet of the
basic was you take the riff the rash the
rambam two out of three
now we should understand already that
the amsterdam was not pleased with that
we mean two out of three their all three
opinions are equal across the board in
every scenario and you just magically
take two out of three no you need to
weigh each alaha separately
weigh the weight and the value of each
opinion in each particular case you need
to learn the gemara yourself see maybe
in some cases the rambam is more
compelling and the riff is more
compelling so the absence