Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Women will conceive in one day! Mashiach Times- Igeres HaKodesh 26b- Rabbi Chaim Dalfin
53 views
Categories:Torah/Chassidus
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
so good day we're continuing the 26th
letter
Andes and um Al
here is explaining a nanic statement in
the whole the section
called which
says
that
the which seems to say that the study of
the revealed part of t which is called
nigla in
Hebrew comes from the
Tree of knowledge of good and
bad and that is very very uh difficult
to understand it's basically saying that
this part of Torah that's bad that that
can't be but that's that's the
implication that's what he's here in
this chapter here to
address
and to get to the answer he goes goes
through many
many
parenthetical and rhetorical remarks
so we have to go through them because to
get to the answer so we're holding
um I'm using the lessons in Tanya for
now just for this chapter a little bit
so
um the lessons in Tanya would
be um
it's on page 125 the the volume I'm
using the words
begin whever we find that dealt
considerably also with the argumentation
of problems and solutions
what the AL is saying here
is that don't tell me
that of the
Z didn't study
mishna and dealt with all the issues in
mishna and nevertheless it said that it
says that he didn't make an
interruption for a Mida from from when
when he was learning
Tyra because his Torah learning was his
occupation
called he didn't make an interruption
for so what do we see how great Tyra
learning is so maybe you want to argue
that the Tyra learning of shim was only
the Z was only
mysticism bar was only
Caba it's not true that's Del now
showing us it's not true he learned
mishna is he learned so so if it would
be if if if if it would be uh from the
Tree of knowledge of good and bad of
course you would make an
interruption from that type of Torah
learning for the amida
for and since he didn't it's proof that
his Torah learning was on a higher level
IE from the Tree of Life That's this is
the rhetorical question let's look
inside
and also all of the
questions that are associated with the
negative side the spirit of folly of imp
purification we find all that
by he studied much of
that even when he was in the
cave you know that that that shim had to
hide from the Romans 13 years in a
cave on the
contrary you know why he
merited receiving the oral tradition of
mysticism of
Caba during those 13 years is
because he was forced to
hide to save his life which was very
painful full the pain itself was the
springboard for
receiving the higher Revelation the
cabala and and and Al brings a piece of
T to support
that
[Music]
say said to a contemporary of
his every question that RAB Pinas asked
he gave him 24 answers for each of his
questions said
to if I would have not seen you in this
situation of hiding in the cave with the
pain associated with it with the
suffering I wouldn't be able to give you
24 answers to your one
question what is this piece of
tal that the SAR of the
Myra
caused him to be able to be mades to
come up with new Novelties in Torah to
the point that he had 24 different
answers for one
question so this shows again that the
shim's Torah
learning of of of nigla of of of of tal
of mishna
was justified not only Justified wanted
and pure not God forbid IE from the Tree
of Life not God forbid the tree of of
knowledge of bad of good and
bad another parenthetical
remark in truth
says what do you think they were
learning most of the time shim and his
son it wasn't only shim hiding it was
the son of Abazar why don't you think
they were learning most of the time
there you imagine talking about the
tunnels and the captives and everything
you guys are experiencing in Isel we're
experiencing as Jews all
together what were they learning there
they were learning most of the timeus
no they were learning most of their time
look what
says the
primary involvement of their
stud was the tah of
mish
600 SED orders of the
Mish which was during their time
till who compiled the mission in six
orders right in other words until he
compiled it it was scattered it was but
it was a total of
the so why can't we say the Primary
Learning of the author of The Zo with
his son was zo say because if it were
the
Z and the section of Z called
they could have finished that in two
three months they didn't need to spend
13 years studying
that surely they didn't say something
twice they didn't repeat each other you
know you go to real Scholars real real
good speakers real talkers real academic
they don't repeat themselves maybe
they'll you take an idea and balance it
this way and tweet it this way but
always trying to give some new nuance
and new you know new version Vision on
the issue so D says if there study would
have
been the Z and and and it wouldn't take
13 gears in two three months they can
finish it why because the style of the Z
is clear
non non kind of cuted non-challenging in
the sense of ppol pit means back and
forth MOS says this Rabin says this how
do you know what's where's mha coming
from where's doin coming from what's
mha's proof and what's doin's proof why
is mha's proof not good enough for
Dophin why is dolphin's proof not good
enough for mha so that's called
pull you don't have that in cabala
cabala what you have is what we
callbar to elaborate and explain there's
the for example the INF the infinite
light of God's called or
and what what why does it say or and it
should be and infinite so then you have
to ask yourself what is r what is light
what's the symbolism of a light so we
look at light the
sunlight and we see and we look at
different aspects of the sunlight
so all of that is part of cab Caba but
it's what we call
clarification pull is is not
clarification pull is
dissertation
dissertation is very
convoluted it's
argumentative it's it's in the world of
debate that takes a long long time
so when you have 600
missioners okay and you have to
debate 600 missioners it's going to take
you 13
years but when it comes to
straightforward statements of of cab of
the Z it takes you two three months
that's what he says here let's continue
inside another rhetorical question the
uses to prove his point that Torah is
not from the Tree of good of knowledge
of good and
bed the says the day that the BD was
destroyed the only thing that's left
since the destruction of the
temple are the four cubits of Jewish law
so what do we see from
here that Jewish law and mishna is the
predecessor the Prelude to Jewish law is
based on the tal and tal is based on the
mishna so we see that all that's left
today is Jewish law God finds himself in
Jewish law and by extension in mishna
and you going to tell me mishna is not
godly that's that's his his that's his
next rhetorical
question now he goes
further look how you have over here in
these words three times the word p which
means
Wonder there's yet further cause to be
exceedingly
amazed
half again twice the word half fo three
times this is to underscore the
amazement
it's like wow wow wow wow or something
like that
okay and what is he
saying I hope you're following if you
don't
ask I'm not a mind reader so he
says
a How can there be the completion the
wholesomeness of
Mia that
Mia shouldn't have to that msia would
not should not have to know the details
of those things that are permissible and
forbidden impure and pure in other words
if we argue that part of Torah is from
the Tree of Knowledge from good and bad
when mesiah will come when the Mia will
come there will be only good that means
some part of Torah will dissipate will
go away will be
revoked how can you say that that's a
good how can you say
that look what he
says how will we Slaughter sacrifices in
the
temple during the time
Mia and also ordinary
things if one won't be aware of the laws
of of the knife used by the
sh
pressing passing and pausing these are
all details of how you're supposed
toally sh an animal if you stop in
middle of the of the of the of the
slaughter of the cut it's called Shia it
invalidates the animal and I've seen it
I was once in the slaughter house and I
saw it and and and I'm not a but I knew
enough to say wait a minute it and I
went over to the m and I said uhuh I
didn't like something I saw he was
supposed to give a cut straight and
instead he cut and he stopped and he
went back isn't that a problem
right and so too there's laws of pausing
of of of of pressing and uh and passing
different details the point is if you
don't know those details during
messiah's time guess what the animal
that's going to be slaughtered by the
slaughterer by the ritual slaughterer by
the is invalid it's puzzle you're not
allowed to eat from that meat mosha it's
considered non
kosher and by the way all of these
details are to lessen the pain of the
animal and to do the process in the most
hygienic and peaceful way contrary to
Peter's argument just for the
record so he
says all of these things if not done
properly invalidate
the the fourth thing is the um it's
called the
uh the dent if there's a dent on the
knife the the blade has to be smooth if
you ever noticed someone who's a
sh has a long
nail has a long
nail because with one of one of the with
his long nail is's able to put it on the
knife and to go like this to see if it's
glut if there's no
indent on the blade of the knife if
there's an indent on the blade of the
knife it's an invalid knife and when
when a comes to a to a rabbi who who
knows these laws for his
approval that his KN that his called
Stelling them
them it's meaning placing preparing your
knife
for that's a that's a that's a a most
important detail in a
kosher kosher who knows what he's doing
so the rabbi will take his nail and he
will check if the blade of the knife is
good or he'll ask the to do it and then
he'll do it as well to see if the has it
right so that's what we're talking about
here that's the words what it means over
here
look so you need to know all these laws
pausing and pressing and the and and and
and pressing and uh and the the the
smoothness of the
blade and that's going to be in the B
mikdash after mhia comes how you going
to know that you got to learn mnas you
got to learn law Messiah here Messiah
there if you don't know law you're not a
good during M's
times so proof is what do you mean that
Mish
there's a part that
is impure from the Tree of of of bad and
good it's all
good you need
it these are his questions that he's
asking on that initial statement that he
mentioned he started the chapter with
from the let's
continue and ask a
question can you find me a man who's
born with with a nature
that shs in a way that Slaughters in a
way without pausing and pressing in
other words the sh has to train himself
how
to it's not excuse me every Tom Dick and
Harry could be a and by the way we had
this here in America in Chicago in
Philly in Baltimore in New York in
Boston you know a large part of of of of
of writing Corpus of writing is about
scandals in the 20s and 30s in American
cities
with to the point that RAB Sal the r
yashab
salvic was almost imprisoned because he
stood up after he came to Boston in 32
and he saw the the the the terrible
situation how people who didn't know
what they were doing were slaughterers
and then it went into the kosher stores
and it said it said the sign bus our
kusher take a look on you can see
pictures on on on the
web from such stores in the 20s and 30s
and it was TR why was a TR sometimes
because the was didn't know what he's
doing he didn't know how to do these
things that we're discussing here other
times he did but they took in trfe meat
I mean it was it was terrible scandals
big scandal scandles big big scandles
there are books written about this and
and and and the mafia was involved so of
course you know they put pressure on the
Jews who were behind this and with the
unions it was this was a very very New
Jersey this was a large issue in our
communities and all from where we all
come from okay so the alus says you're
not
born with a natural tendency to know how
to sh an animal you have to train
yourself so if and if you don't have the
training I don't care if you're around
during Mah's times you won't be a good
your will be invalid so obviously you
need to learn the laws so the laws are
holy and and they're only good not bad
God forbid that's his point
oh and the and and the knife should
shouldn't have any in
dents the fat and the
blood and other prohibitions
the also the law surrounding a a corpse
a
body will need to
know the will die the age of
100 is showing different laws that'll be
necessary to know the laws of a woman
after she gives birth she becomes
spiritually impure until she goes to the
should be pregnant and and and and and
give
birth
together if a woman will give birth
every
day resulting from one marital
Union in time to come pregnancy will not
last nine months one second H look at
this listen this cuz this is something
very interesting to know I mean we're
all pretty much you know done with
having kids I think anyway in time to
come pregnany will not last n months on
the same day that a woman conceives she
will give birth whever additional
children will be born on successive days
from that same
conception yes H what do you want to
say we went by a line that I didn't
understand which
one what are we talking about there some
kind of reference from the navi but I
don't know what to referring to we had
been talking uh we've been talking about
um uh the law of the knife and and so
right no he's giving he's giving he's
giving other
examples is giving examples so what's
the example here the example here is
that
the laws of impurity will be
relevant even during that
time even during the the Messianic
time 100 years old I mean the
implication being will live so long that
a 100y old will be called a Nar is that
what the idea no no no that even someone
he's he's called a Nar even though he
and he'll die at 100 but
he's
impure in other the point out every want
that you have to you have to know the
laws of meaning there'll still be death
and there'll still be impurity from
Death is that okay and that that's
that's a question that I was thinking I
because as far as I know uh when during
Mia's time there won't be death so it
could be he means the the first stage is
different stages so probably he means
yes there'll be Death at a the Messianic
time are there's different periods that
the r writes in in
his so I assume what he means here that
even during the Messianic age the first
stage there'll be death and you'll need
to know the laws how to deal with it
because the body will be impure so if
you argue that
that that um in messiah's time there's
only good so how could it be impurity
still left from the body that dies even
at the age of a
100 is that is that clear is that
clear I think so and and that's why he
gives now another and he gives H he
gives now another example this example
that a woman even though it says during
mashiach's time a woman will give birth
right away not 9 months but still at a
certain stage of mhi's during that
period they'll she'll have to bring a
sacrifice because he'll be impure and go
to the mikah the point that the point
that he's making is he's giving us
examples showing that Tuma and Tara will
still be applicable during a certain
stage during mashiach's time and
therefore you cannot to argue that it
that that that part of Torah is
considered um impure is is is is wrong
that's his point it because if it's well
go ahead what we just flipped out for a
moment so I didn't hear the last minute
or
so I said that he's bringing these
different examples
in to that that they will apply even
during the first stage of mhi's coming
so therefore you need to be
knowledgeable in those laws and if we
are to accept the enigmatic statement of
The Zo that we began the chapter that
part of Torah is from the side of good
and bad well and the part that's bad is
associated with these laws of defilement
and impurity that why is IR relevant
during the time of mssiah and the answer
is cuz it's not bad it's only good and
the the and and the Torah wants us to
deal with with the death and and and and
the nid and all of
that that that's his line of thinking
Throughout the
chapter nevertheless the laws with
respect to the restrictions resulting
from her impurity will not change and
therefore you need to know the
laws there's no need to dwell on
something that's so
obvious it's public knowledge the
reverse is public knowledge that the
reverse meaning that it is important
throughout sh and medes the and he again
he's he's bringing more proof
to the there's a a question a a law for
the time of mhia in other words the
sometimes we'll ask what you're saying
seems to be applicable only when Messiah
comes so why is it relevant now so what
do we see from that question of the
talmud that that the law is relevant to
the time of Messiah then T wants to know
why we worrying about it now and
whatever the answer is it's not relevant
right now but the question itself is
indicative that that this is pure and
it's valid and it's only good and that's
why it'll apply even during Mia's
time Elijah will come to clarify all
doubts this all from the tamic
statements this section will be
clarified and expounded upon in the
future comes by Elijah
well another thing that says that I said
earlier that says that's not
comprehensible it's difficult to
understand quote the
says Scholars Torah Scholars won't be
sustained by
ignores and not by the mixed
multitude who eat something that is fit
impure and prohibited God
forbid so the AL says wait a
minute we find during the second
temple Scholars the were not didn't
depend on their
survival from
theoris who eat that
during the second temple the second
everyone knows they were wealthier they
had their own
Vineyards they had their own they had
their own
Fields just
like
even were involved in studying the laws
of things that are prohibited and
principle and impure and pure
call be made by sh all the pairs of of
the sages who lived at the time the
second
temple and they raised disciples in
thousands and 10
thousands and while and that's what they
taught them openly the other stuff the
cabala was was was concealed so we we
see from this that the toyra scholars
need not be sustained by the illiterate
by
ignoramuses which therefore you would
think you wouldn't study those laws
that's Al's Point don't tell me desire
seems to say that you know
why that there is some negativity to
certain parts of laws because it's
associated with ignoramuses with the
audits so says I'm sorry during the B
second BAS
the had their own fields and Vineyard
and were wealthy they didn't have to
come on and they still learned those
laws the point all of this is to
um to to this finalizes kind of his
questions on the zoharic statement tomor
will begin learning the answer s take
care everybody thank you byebye that's B