Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Tanya Igeres haTeshuva 1a, Its fundamentals as taught by the Alter Rebbe - R' Chaim Dalfin
30 views
Categories:Torah/Chassidus
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
okay so we're learning the sh UA on page
189 it's the third section of
Tanya
although in the tanas that we have that
we use it doesn't say an
introduction in
the in the uh in the back of Tanya it
says that the printer omitted
the the the brief introduction which
says which
says the name of this book T is called a
collection of of
sayings the
third
section that's
called B with the
name so we don't have that printed and
why they didn't insert it because in the
original the Alba wrote that the AL
himself wrote that I don't know but uh
this is a fact so what we know from this
is
thata is the third section of Tanya and
why am I saying that because you could
argue that each of the sections have
nothing to do with each
other the first
section
says that's called with the name the
book of the intermediates the the book
for the average person
sa is all
about you know the potential b as we
learned at length in the first 53
chapters the second section is about
faith in God Unity God reconciling
Creation With God what does that have to
do with the first section in other words
it it say though it's it's a separate
safer it's a separate book of 12
chapters and the same is with it get at
Chua as we will learn it's all about
chuva so what does it have to do with
the first section so the first thing you
have to know that the balat the author
himself self says no wrong it's all one
safer
called and so far I've divided into
three sections so
this this is coming from the author so
therefore we understand that there's a
relationship between the
three and the re once spoke about this
and I'll make it very brief I think you
you you have you have some of it in
lessons in Tanya already but basically
the re said the previous reab said
actually the Reb explained it the
previous Reb said that the four sections
of T
right and then the fourth
section
correspond to the
um then there's
um I'm
sorry also it corresponds to the four
letters of the
K the I explained at length I'll make it
just very brief
one in other words when we speak about
AB God's name the inevitable
name of
yut it's not just four letters put
together it's a composite of an of one
idea called God how God expresses
himself through UD first k v and the
last
K okay yes sir and this is explained at
L and I'm not going into that now either
just giving you the the
facts so so is also with the you know
the the code of Jewish
law it's not four separate
sections it's
one common thread of living a Jewish
holy life as dictated by God Almighty
expressed in four
ways daily law koser
law marriage law divorce
law
and monetary
law basically comprising all of one's
experiences so is
there using that
idea the same is with the safer
of it's not that the first section is
for the B and the second and third are
for
sadim or B TR
but and have no connection wrong they
all have a connection we have to find a
connection we have to work on that so
therefore the Al's opening words that
are omitted here in the printed Tanya we
have it as we have it today but we're in
the original therefore our valid is an
integral part to know
that is the third section of
so if one wants to have the full gamut
of which is the safer that the this
author the balatan wrote the third
section is important for the
understanding and follow through of
number of number one and number two and
just speaking out
loud the first section is
about okay if we had to sum up what is
the first section of Tanya about mind
over
matter right the second section that we
just
finished is about faith in
God
right both those two without the element
of Tashua are lacking are missing what
are they
missing practical Behavior shape up or
ship
out yeah in other
words say you sir you want to now follow
a a trajectory of
self-improvement
hey we know there were and there are and
ab you're from California all these
kinds of
self-improvement um approaches from the
60s and 70s War
airart and on and on I've met people
like that I'm sure you've met people
like
that so why do we need why do we
need go to a seminar read a book Dale
Carnegie and Company and you'll be
fine and so with regarding the second
section which is up the alley of of iser
philosophy
philosophies you know and hopefully
you'll come to some of the same
conclusions and if not okay so but in
other words why why why can't I read
Aristotle and Plato and and other
philosophers and then R going and and
and RAM you know Jewish philosophers so
Jewish philosophers lead you to T
Mitzvah Aristotle and Plato not not
don't necessarily lead you to
mitz
but why why must I have chuva and the
answer is because with philosophy you
either will get it right you'll get it
wrong I just was listening to a little
bit before this year to a podcast of two
former uh from people fully
from and kabad
Niks and and I know you know both one of
them I know one of them I know the
family name and very
bright
and completely
intellectually they they're not doing
chuva they're not doing a Chua they're
involved
in and
therefore they L certain teachers they
had and they even shed a tear and
they'll go to the o but when it comes to
practical life putting Onan putting on
the
muza give
surrendering which is chuva they won't
do not yet they did it once but now
they're in a mode of I know better and
you know and ab Khan for
example he didn't know nii he didn't
know
Newton he knew Al he knew R he knew all
that
and he was gifted in a genius there but
there are other disciplines and
philosophies that's where it geta comes
in and Cha tells the philosopher
of you want your philosophy to be in
accordance with God you have to do
chuva and what is chuva surrendering to
God the way he describes in Torah even
though you understand otherwise
oh so that is how get that we're about
to start learning
compliments the second section
of and the first section which is
self-improvement is it
clear you understand yeah no questions
because it's very important to get the
trajectory questions on the next part
on which
part wait wait I know is Sir you asked
me the same thing a year
ago and I'm so happy that you still have
the question and that you're still
learning at the shear that shows that
you're on the right path cuz we don't
know everything and guess what maybe I
won't have the answer for you or maybe
the answer won't be satisfactory but
that's get us saua you don't throw it
all out you know you know that's the
that's what makes a the difference
between the difference between a from
and someone who's not yet from is this
this point just because I don't
understand or I don't relate or I don't
feel I I Surrender that's the bottom
line do I surrender to God Almighty
although I don't get it and it's not
it's not it's not easy especially for
someone who's philosophically minded
intellectually oriented you know these
are for that type of person these
questions and these issues are very very
bothersome and it doesn't let you
rest but we learn from yeden who lived
life in the past and we read their works
or we heard we hear them speak and we
hear them teach and we see that they
also didn't have all answers beginning
withu I don't know do the voice he
admitted I don't
know the
r right we don't have all the
answers so anyway going back to the
point this is I I just wanted
to give an
introduction to the importance of a Chua
as it applies to section one and section
two of Tanya let's begin now
page8
p is brought in
a at the end of
track there are three
divisions categories of
atonement and with each one the CH
in
and Chua
is
necessary with each of the three and
let's learn continue from the
BR number
one say if someone desecrated a positive
Comm a positive commandment
V and the person did
cha the person regretted not fulfilling
the positive Commandment that God
instructed says the
BR one is not budged and moved from the
air in other words that TR is not
adequate until he return he he until
he's pardoned
we'll explain later that's number one
the second category
of what if someone desecrated a pro a
pro a
prohibited commandment Lo do not do this
and this and the person did it the and
the person regret it and the
Chua says the the BR
CH chuva keeps you
hanging the
and in that scenario yipper atones when
it comes
yipper and you and you and you
participate and you Kipper through
fasting and everything else the day
itself atones for your desecration of
a will continue later in the chapter
with the third section of the
BR but immediately here
says p in the in the parenthesis the
meaning of the previous
stated although regarding the
Fulfillment
of it is
greater because it pushes aside a proh
Prohibition for
example T says right in the you shall
wear
titas what of the titas is made of wool
and linen together which isness it's a
Prohibition you know what the
is I
say the MIT of wearing TI pushes aside
the
mitz of sh and you wear those
sissors what do we see from here
seemingly that which is more powerful I
say I say I say cuz the proof is when it
comes to a scenario where you have both
coming together the the sages teach
us what did we learn just before in the
tractate Yuma one second one second
please give me a minute what have you
learned at the end of traed Yuma which
it it says there that
for not doing a positive
commandment I'm sorry I learned it wrong
I I I I read it wrong before I said
chuva is not adequate wrong Chua is
enough and therefore you're
atoned but when it comes to desecrating
Al the the says
Tru Chu keeps you hanging kind of and
until yipper you don't have forgiveness
what does that imply which is which is
stronger Which is higher which is
greater a or or or a say Al so that's
why for Al you need your own keeper and
for not doing a say all you need is
trva so it seems to be a
contradiction this is what the AL is is
responding to in this parenthesis let me
just finish it first and then I'll take
your point the question
is answers the AL to his rhetorical
question the reason
why because through the Fulfillment of
an a you draw down light
energy and she influence to the upper
worlds from the elmination of the
infinite light of
God it says
in the
248 positive
Commandments they are allude to the
248 limbs of the king referring to God
the
King and not only do you draw down
energy to the spiritual worlds but you
draw down also
energy when you do a
say upon your your own Godly
Soul as it
says right when we make a
for we
say God has made us holy he Sanctified
us so in other words we is become holy
we
become through through his
mitz so what's the AL answering to his
rhetorical question that
regarding regarding
fulfillment I say is greater than lo I
say because I say draws down
light whereas say you don't draw down
any
light you don't draw down a light a say
means you positive
proactive Los means you're
abstaining so you know what a Los does
it cleans up the room
says it's analogous to Preparing a room
for a king what's the first thing you
have to do clean it up get rid of the
Schmutz
once you get rid of the you have to
bring in
Furniture Lo say is cleaning up the
room do not do this and if you do it you
have to clean up the
room with chuva and Y
Kipper but that's in other words for
what we will call
Tik so we have two things I want you to
hear this and think about
it and Tik as far asum as far as
fulfillment of
fulfillment I say is greater than Los
say because by a say you draw down a
light and lo say you don't draw down a
light as far as tick is concerned guess
what LO is greater than I
say because Lo say means I messed up and
when we mess up we leave a mark there's
DNA there's Blood on the glove from that
famous OJ Simpson uh Fiasco right there
is a Remnant
leftover M Myers I got your attention I
see uh the the the there is a Remnant we
excuse the expression screw it up when
you mess
up there's there's blood left on a
glove no one wants to be around that you
got to clean it up
they see with October 7th now the
kadisha goes around cleaning up the
blood that's spilled and to put it into
the Cav has to be cleaned up so as far
as L is concerned a mess was made and a
mess is made it needs
tick but in no and and I
say put on filling you didn't put on
filling you didn't leave a stand you
know what you did you just didn't draw
down the energy that you could have
drawn down through putting on fill
in but you didn't leave a stain a pagam
in Hebrew you didn't leave a pagami sir
the P the pagam issue is through
Los the drawing down of energy is an a
issue that's what Al is saying here that
it's not a contradiction because when
Kaz say I say
that when you have a contradiction
between a like wearing TI while it's
shockness there you're talking about
drawing down energy so the energy
stronger it
outweighs the the the
prohibition but when it comes to doing
chuva for a stain for
aam there there the K say the end of
sofa what do they say they say there you
have to work twice as hard to to clean
up the mess and think of it just
practically let's be practical it's so
much harder to clean up a mess than to
draw down positive energy right you know
someone who's not religious you pull
them into aab house you pull him to a
Shool you say put your filling on here
come make a br sit by a table why not I
don't know what a brook is I don't know
what fill is you tell me to do it fine
years later you learn about it in other
words it's much easier to relate to a
say but it's so so much more difficult
to stop a bad
habit that's a lot more
difficult whatever it is whether it be
eating a cheeseburger or being a excuse
me a jerk and not a men and treating
another person properly which is also
a right that's much harder to
change so that's what Al says it's not a
contradiction the Miss is talking about
the stain part The Tick
part right the Mish is giving you three
categories of sins that need T the m is
not talking about the positive aspect of
doing
Mitzvah whereas when talk about mitz say
they're talking about the positive
aspect yes before I go further now Isa
what do you want to
say I never I never thought about this
but how do we how do we done
between I think the simple answer I say
simple is when you intentionally have
that in mind
when you but I know but I know that
shottis is an
iser and I intentionally put it on my
cus my w cus I put linen linen uh my
wool garment I put linen
SAS I I I think the answer is I I never
I never
right distinguish right it it's it's a
good point you're making it's something
that I want to think about it um thank
you for raising the question but I have
this this feeling this that the answer
is that
mitvah
means I'm going to do a Mitzvah knowing
quite well that it's a
by it's not that I want to do this way I
have to do it this
way I I'll give you give you a PR wait
wait wait wait wait wait is did you hear
you jumped did you hear what I said no I
did hear I did
hear come sukus time when people put
their suas on the sidewalks in the
streets without
permission
or well that that's that ex I don't know
that
example you're you're assuming that that
it's an a putting a Suk on a
sidewalk you have to have
permission okay so that so that go so
that goes into a thing
called
right that's that's a that's a whole
that's a Pandora's Box that there's a
lot of discussion about that okay you
know it's not that simple the way you're
saying it it could be the end will be
that you're right but it it's a big
discussion I looked into this years ago
this this topic of of of um
uh one as if if my memory serves me
well means that the government the the
malus says it must be this way what if
you do something that isn't a viol of
the way it must be but it's it's you do
it but it's it's like not the way they
they would want it but it's not against
what they would
want the
example I go on your property and put up
a su my property is different than
public
property my property
cannot okay and and and by the way is
and even that is not simple my neighbor
built out right here I'm point to the
backyard an extension blocking the
sun
now exactly
exactly and and you know there were I
went to samon and they said you have a a
you could take him to a
b before you know to go to court I mean
this is a serious violation
then someone else said well the the
speaks about just the blocking of the
window not the blocking of part of the
wall and and you know the sun is not an
argument the window might be hea all all
of that you know my point
is the the point I'm saying is that when
you say you know he builds it on your
property yeah initially that's that's
definitely wrong and and against I
agree but but but the
public property but why why are we
talking about this you wanted to give
this as an example I was just I never I
never considered how we distinguish
between right right okay I I will
[Music]
toal is Rule There are rules and you
find out just yeah AB you're following
our discussion is
discussion yeah I understand it yeah
okay so so so uh I want to discuss this
with some
big cuz it is a good point but I think
that there's the the Mitzvah very is
almost like
intentional that's and and and and
the is it's not coming from the
intentional point it's because
you're okay let let let me let me let me
let me get back b anyway let's go back
to the piece of T
here but regarding the aspect of
CH although one is
[Music]
pardoned oh one second what is the AL
saying now with the
words this is what he's he's he's
addressing if you're telling me that MIT
emphasizes the the
Fulfillment and
the the emphasizes the
ti so why must why does the mishna say
you have to do
chuva for for um for a say in other
words seemingly chuva is a is a is is is
wiping away the stain the the the the
mark the the pagam the
blemish and and we just finished
explaining that when it comes to Mitzvah
say it's not about a blemish it's about
you didn't draw down the light you could
have drawn down so why do you have to do
Chua that's what the AL addresses
now although the says for Say by
doing you won't get a punishment for not
doing what you were supposed to
do says here the idea of CH
is you know what CH helps when it comes
to MIT say for the Rebellion here's a
third the rebellion and as far as the
Rebellion Rebellion against God God says
put fill on and you say no I'm not
putting on fill you have rebelled forget
about whether you left a stain or Mark
or you didn't or whether you drew down
the light you you're you're now
right you have
audacity you are a moate a rebellion
rebellious for that you need to do
chuva says the AL now so though you do
Chua for the
Rebellion guess what it don't change the
facts on on on the ground what are the
facts on the ground the energy that you
were supposed to draw down through
putting
on is missing and
lacking as the sages
say there are certain sins that you
cannot
correct the sages teach this refers
to this refers to someone who desecrates
the nightly krishma the morning chrish
but not by not saying it you can't make
it
up I did jua I feel terrible that I
didn't say krishma at night the
bottom the bottom line is you didn't say
krishma you didn't draw down that
energy and
say it's amongst the sins that cannot be
corrected there's no tickle by the way
if you remember in chapter in section
one of Tanya chapter 7
spoke about a way where you can get Chua
for that too through chuaa but you know
Chu Mi Chua from great abundant love but
he's not he's not talking about that now
what do you want to say AB I see you
clicked yes what about if a person has a
opportunity to learn Torah they don't
they don't do
it it it you're asking me if it's in the
category
of what that apply
wouldn't bring down a light you wouldn't
it
[Music]
wouldn't I I I don't I I don't want to
answer without I think it does but I I
want to check that I think I heard
something but I have to the point is
like this that every MIT say when not
done the light is
lacking is comparing it to what say
about certain Mitzvah that if you don't
do them you can't make up you can't make
can't make them out up so he's saying
what's the logic why can't you make it
up because you missed today
krishma so do chuva very nice you'll do
chuva so you other words the fact that
you didn't say today and you rebelled
against God and you do chuva the trua
will help for the Rebellion but the
light wasn't drawn
down now you're asking asking if that
applies to every moment learning Torah
it could
be it could
be but is that supposed to make us feel
better or worse
AB cuz say brought it earlier in Tanya
there are three three Mitzvah that we
can't get away from
not desecrating them daily and one is
learning every moment so if the Kaz say
that God God it means god is saying and
God understands and he finds a way to to
Pardon
Us in other
words right what is it B
Torah but that thatal itself M that
kazal itself is telling us I understand
you people you're not you're not going
to be learning every moment I'm not
going to give you a free a free ride you
know you but but at the same time um I I
I'm understanding in the sense that uh
that's the way it
is okay we'll stop
here if you don't do say in the morning
right so that's that's that's
another question and Nuance this
is that that the question is whether you
don't doar all or you don't do it
BisMan I have to audience today yeah
yeah yeah I I I'm not going to jump to
answer that cuz plenty of people not
just in bemes but right here in good old
B Park in flatb and Toronto uh who miss
you know now shabas 8:30 is man is his
man so some people sleep in but I'll
tell you something it's it's it's a it's
a serious issue that I was trained and I
was raised to be cognizant of you know
and to it to take it very seriously and
and and the few times that I missed I I
I felt very bad you know in other words
it I could have been up all night and I
was planning on getting up and I or
there were times I remember I went I ran
and I I have a minute or two what do I
do I didn't say BR so I say right first
thing the point listen okay you know the
point is we got to take it seriously
go ahead I hear so the question I was
going to ask Rel is forgetting about the
specific
of in terms of if you miss a t if you
miss something that we should do are we
held accountable in Shay oh you didn't
do this you didn't do that you didn't do
this you know we're held accountable
it's on the it's on the scale it's on
the scale there's no question about it
but but but but but remember what it
says in P in chapter 7 the first section
of Tanya through CH MI through this
intense truva that even that's pardoned
the only thing that mentions there that
is like
impossible is the you know illicit
relationships where there's a drop of
semen going into another body you know
and
creating and even even that there are
stories of of of a way of Chua which
aren't Pleasant which I don't want to go
into right now but but outside of those
things as long as it's you and you you
can deal with it there there's a way
to to draw down the light but with but
again since he's not talking about it
here he doesn't he doesn't mention it so
the answer would be M to your point if
someone missed krishma and K say what
they say let him intensify his own
krishma let him get other people to get
up on time to say krishma and when you
show and you work hard then you show
that you're Chua really is is is deep
and meaningful and then it's a Chua Mi
with from great abundant love and uh you
you have atonement at that time as well
okay good learning we'll learn tomorrow
Z doesn't everyone have a great day
shalom byebye