Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Maamar Lo Tiye Mishakela 1952, #4- is the world a reality or not? it depends- RC Dalfin
31 views
Categories:Torah/Chassidus
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Good day. We learn.
We're in chapter 2 towards the end uh
page 117 in lessons in my
just to uh recap briefly.
The Reb explains over here begins
answering his question.
Question is, is avoid relevant to Hashem
or not? Does Hashem get fathomemed by us
serving him or not? He brings
contradictory khazal's tabutic
teachings.
He also says logically doesn't make any
sense. Those were his questions. And he
this first answer
is that it depends what level of Hashem
you're talking about. In other words,
there's a concept I think we're going to
learn about it today called Elo and Das.
I assume you you remember those words
which means upper knowledge and lower
knowledge. But what does that mean? It's
like like like French, right? What what
does it mean if we don't
is the perspective from of God
is God is our perspective that God gives
us and wants. So the everything is from
even is not a human perspective.
It's only human in the sense that Hashem
chooses to allow humanity
to be part of it.
And the difference between das and das
is whether there is an existence or
there is no existence. Meaning
accepts the perspective or better said
better said is the is the perspective
that the world
is created
exists the yesesh a gashmi is a reality
because hashem wants it to be a reality
but that's it's a reality and being that
it's a reality
we view everything from that reality.
ity
understandably since it's it's from that
reality there are limitations because
the yesi is limited and conditioned so
everything that comes forth from that
reality is a tainted
view in comparison to tas which I'm
going to talk about now in a moment you
understand so when I say it's tainted
it's tainted in the sense in the
comparison to daselon.
What is das elen? Daselion is elen is
that the yeshiti the only true existence
is
and and we are in nothing. There's no
reality to our to our existence. In
other words, we don't exist.
But the po mameish we we're here. Of
course, we're here. The question is what
is your consciousness?
is your consciousness anoid mulvad and
not just anoid mulvad the way we filter
anoid mulvad the way we filter anoid
mulvad it's a limited anoid mulvado
I remember once the and I think it's
printed now in the
explained a fascinating difference
between anoid and anoid milvad
there are two expressions
one is there's nothing besides him.
Anoid mil. And there's another
expression anoid.
There's nothing else.
What's the difference between anoid and
an
I believe that this is one of the
differences or the difference the
perspective of das versus the spec
perspective of das.
When you say
there's nothing else besides him, guess
what is that means? With him
I exist.
There's nothing without him but with him
I'm also in existence. That's
a means nothing. No more nothing else.
In other words, even the milad doesn't
exist in the consciousness of anoid.
That's that's
so with with these two ideas, we're
going to continue now in the mimer
discussing
these two realities
as the place in which we say a void is
relevant or avoid is not relevant. And
basically in the realm and experience
of
over there a void is very relevant
and not only over there but both like we
learned yesterday in the kaleim and in
the R and in the R that's the mucker of
the R
and all of that they are all fathomemed
by avoid because they're excuse me
they are all part of of
however in
there which is the anoid over there is
not relevant so that that would be a way
to reconcile the contradictory
statements of let's look inside the text
now
page 117 last
This is because is relevant to what we
call.
Okay, I have to stop here and give you
another introduction.
It says in Cabola
that Hashem has 10 spheres.
Then it says also there's something
called kesser the crown right there is
the mind there's the heart and there's
the hands and the feet the action
but then there's a crown on top of the
head we call this in Russian kabala
kesser
now what does the crown Crown symbolic
of the crown is unique in that it's not
it's not the the in the brain the mind
it's above the mind it's on the head at
the same time it's on the head.
So when you say something is on the head
moa, you're already acknowledging
there's an association between the crown
and the head
otherwise they wouldn't be on the head.
Right? So what so what does explain
explains that there's two aspects to
kesser to the crown. There's something
called
the inner aspect of and the external
aspect or there's two words that are
used frequently inabis
and
ar means long from the word ar
and it's also at times called arin
long faces
compared to something called as I say
small faces
is that aspect of
that has an association
to the to the head to the to the to
everything that follows. In other words,
it's in the analogy that I gave you,
it's the uh
it's the um the part of the crown that's
on the head
associated with the head.
Atik is the other word for what we call
pmia
and that is from the word net. It's
removed.
It's removed from the consciousness of
the 10 spheros starting with
it's
called inabia.
So here the rebba is going to introduce
this these words as part of the
difference between where a void is
relevant or not. A void is relevant in
the in in practicality
in em in the emotions in the intellect
and also in that part of the crown
that's on the head because that part of
the crown is already impacted by the
head by intellect. So true, it's a crown
which by the way is explained in there's
the concept of the will of Hashem. But
there's there's the
you've heard these words the inner will
and there's the
the external will. What's the
difference? The external will is
tainted, controlled
and uh maneuvered
by the situation.
So the will follows
the and the emotions and various
whatever the situation is.
Means the inner will you don't control
me, I control you.
That's what we call. Now let's go back
to the text. So he says he says
relevant
the other level called
is the source for emanations.
and since by creations
and even emanations
service of God is relevant.
Therefore,
therefore, even at in in the source of
emanations in the parenthesis, what is
the source called
this level called
a is relevant there? And if you do
avoid, you're connecting. If you don't,
it makes a a a deficiency in the
relationship.
Conversely,
in the level of
the which is the inner level,
This was recorded before the medish.
Does God really care? Does Hashem really
care if you the animal from the neck or
you the the animal in the back? Come on.
You got to be kidding. Does that re
really fathom Hashem? says that Eba that
that statement in the medish
is referring to
the level of from Atik's perspective it
makes no difference
FROM ARIC'S PERSPECTIVE boy does it make
a difference why not
the level of is what we call the master
The the oneness, the one master, the
singular masterim,
the source of sources
says the term that's brought in uses THE
WORDS THE SOURCE OF THE SOURCES.
What does it mean?
Okay.
We have which means emanation.
Then we have
like this when we say
creatures.
The word
is only possible in the world of bria.
Hence the word nraim
created beings.
What about in Ailus?
In Ailus,
there's not created beings. There's only
emanations
known as net salim.
And then there's something that's called
the source of net.
So the Reb says that when it says in
that
is impacted
in the level of called
we're not talking about we're talking
about even higher the source of sources.
That's what he says here.
The level of the source of the source is
beyond the ability to be a source. Okay?
You see, when you talk about something
being a source, it has a rel it has an
association.
When you talk about something not being
the source, BUT BEING THE SOURCE OF THE
SOURCE, there's no ASSOCIATION BETWEEN
THE SOURCE of the source and the result
of the source.
That's what he says.
Let's continue.
Now, the Reb goes even further.
Truthfully speaking, he says, truthfully
speaking, you should know he says that
that
it's also separate.
It's also separate. It's it's
totally
um removed from any idea of source.
He goes back his argument is very
simple. The word
means removed removed from anything.
That's why I said before it's not
but with with him there is a world there
is a source. IT'S ANOID. THERE'S NOTHING
ELSE. There's something saying there's
nothing else except when as soon as you
say there's nothing else except you're
acknowledging there is a something. When
you say there's nothing else, there's
nothing more to say because there's
nothing else. That's the point.
meaning that this this level of is
completely removed from
if so the question is
why is it called the source of sources
make up your mind that's the point here
this is his rhetorical remark if there's
no association between this exper this
consciousness the supra consciousness
and lower then why do you call it A
SOURCE OF SOURCES? IT'S NOT A SOURCE.
That's his question. So the says you're
right.
It's a borrowed term. It's a figure of
speech.
And at this level is not relevant.
And regarding this level we we it is
written
If you've sinned, you haven't impacted
me.
And if you do an abundance of sin, you
haven't done anything to him.
If you do good, what have you given to
him? I want to read the note here
on page 119,
the the large paragraph here.
The intent is that since all existence
ultimately comes from yin,
it can be called its source.
Nevertheless,
in a cause and in effect relationship,
a source usually shares a connection to
the entities that come into existence
from it. This is not true of atik. On
the contrary, it so utterly transcends
all existence that it cannot be termed
its source. Therefore, it is called the
source of sources. That is, it is the
root from which emanates the levels that
serve as sources for all existence.
Moreever the third the term source of
sources
itself is essentially improper
because
atic transcends those sources as well.
Nevertheless, the term is used because
ultimately in a unique mystic pattern,
these sources emanate from and this is
the most fitting term the sages of the
kabala could find to communicate that
fact. So in other words, the sages of
kabala
had no words other than this to express
this level. But the truth is, this is
what we're saying. The truth is that the
level that that that we're talking about
where God is not fathomemed is even
beyond this.
Okay.
What?
Look now at the bottom, the last note.
As the Reb proceeds to explain in the
subsequent sections of the mimer, this
resolution is unacceptable. In other
words, the Reba had here a a resolution
for the contradictory
midrashim.
The note is telling us what we're going
to be learning in the upcoming chapters
that it's unacceptable.
Why? Because the wording of the verse
reflects an unresolved difficulty.
That difficulty, however, goes far
beyond the textual inongruity.
It is fundamental to the core of our
relationship with God. According to the
explanation until now, our service
relates only to those dimensions of
godliness that are revealed not to his
essence. As such, it would imply THAT
THERE IS NO ACTIVE RELATIONSHIP between
man and God's essence. The Reb has a
very simple very simple logical argument
why he refuts this as as as an answer.
based on this
our avoida is is relevant to kind of a
lower aspect of God. How can you say
that
Hashem created us? All of Hashem created
us. And obviously to say that part of
Hashem that created us is not we don't
have an association with is is heresy in
a way
doesn't use the word heresy but that
that's the does it make a difference or
not. So you're telling me it makes a
difference only till here. It doesn't
make a difference here. If it doesn't
make a difference here, the higher
level, then you're cutting off that
higher level from us. That means and and
cutting that then it's an oxymoron. God
created Hashem in all of his
might and Hashem and his all of his uh
Hashem created us. That means he all of
God wants to have a relationship with
us. AND NOW YOU'RE TELLING ME NO, NO,
NO, NO. We the us don't have a
relationship with the essence of God.
That's that's an oxymoron.
And that's why the Reb doesn't accept
this as the ultimate answer.
Let's look at the summary. I'm bringing
the summary now.
The fulfillment of these blessings
depends on the Jews carrying out the
stipulation on which all these promises
are based. Quote, "And you shall serve
God your Lord." In other words, the the
the fulfillment of these blessings misha
refers to the p that we began the mimer
with you will be blessed with an
abundance of children, health and
sustenance. Those are the blessings
we're talking about. So
we learned and we're continuing to learn
that it depends on whether we serve God
or not. The concept of serving God is
problematic.
This is a kits or a summary of what we
learned in chapter 3. On this material
plane, a master has a servant perform
services for him because the servant can
enable the master to reach a level of
completeness that he lacked previously.
This is obviously not true with regard
to Hashem because he is the ultimate of
perfection. In that vein, our sages
state, quote, "Does it make a difference
to the holy one, blessed be he, whether
one slaughters from the front of the
neck or from the nape?
The mitzvah were given solely to refine
the created beings.
On the other hand,
there are sources that indicate that a
person's divine service, his aid has an
effect above, has an effect above that a
yea service can enhance it. Can enhance
or heaven forbid weaken the revelation
of godliness to godliness. In
resolution, it is explained that man's
service is significant regarding the
levels of godly light revealed in the
spiritual worlds and even to the sublime
levels that serve as sources for that
revelation.
However, God's essential light, however,
is above being affected by man's
service. This is a kiter of what we
learned in this chapter three.
The note before that I read is the Reb's
rejection of this resolution as we will
learn in the next chapter. We have a few
minutes now. We'll stop over here as far
as the text
and talk about
a few idea. We just had two bishvat this
this this past week.
is what we call the you know the right
the birthday of the trees. It's
explained in
that a man based on the verse in the a
man is like a tree that the whole idea
of a tree is to grow and to give out
good fruit
and this is important because it's not
enough to give out wheat but fruit
right
what's the idea of the fruit tub
pleasure in other words The emphasis of
of tishvat is the the pleasure in your
life. It's the birthday of pleasure.
And it's to highlight that
when we do something Hashem's will, we
could do bare minimum, we can, you know,
kind of get away with it, find
loopholes,
that idea. And
there are hic loopholes for many things.
And there is you know doing a mitzvah
let's say but not mahadin mahadrin.
So tishvah teaches you it's not enough
just to not not enough to do it that way
but to really do it with the fruit of
the tree which is the delight and
pleasure gishmak.
So in in a hashem
it's this way just from the basic
getting up in the morning person goes to
sh even if they go to sh and they hear
the and they dab with talis and
but there needs to be a gashmak a
pleasure where you look forward every
morning to going to sh and dvening or if
for some reason you don't go to shul but
to daven and really find
delight pleasure in what you're doing.
And the same in every single mitzvah.
And when we exhibit this ourselves,
others, especially children,
grandchildren, see it and it makes an
impact. It makes a very big impact on
them later in life. And it makes an
impact on other people in shul too. I
I've told you over and over how
I come to sh I sit by the wall. I sit
facing a wall. I don't want to know
what's going on behind me. I don't need
to know. I need to focus on Hashem.
So
for me, the best thing is to sit and
look at the wall and dive in. You know,
if you have a talis and you put your
talis over your head, you you have to
block out all of theen
nonsense and even things that are not
nonsense.
And it's not easy. It's really not easy.
And I'm far from perfect. But that's the
idea to to to to avoid, you know,
disturbances
if if it's relevant. Someone's a gabbi,
a rabbi or you know and this morning you
know the the came to shul so person in
charge of the minion you know he wasn't
there so we said
he came in so the person announced so
you know there needs to be a person that
should let people know there's a here
now so you're exempt from here on okay
But but but if you're not in that
position,
just dive into yourself with kavana and
and say the words not you know say it
very loud but you know should should be
heard and sure that there's a there's a
minion not a cemetery here and you'll be
surprised how people are impacted and
people will respect you for again if
it's done in the right way if not done
you know in an aggressive loud way which
I
in Hish Kodes when I was there years ago
there were times when there were some
people who came in and were shouting
okay he wasn't well this young man I
understand but I'm just saying you know
to to to have a cobb
this is not it's not
you look into the alterb says it in
Tanya he says in the last chapter over
there in Tanya Before we make a matanya
you should sit you should stand around
the kazin. He says 10 people should
stand around the kazin and dav be
together with the kazin. That's what it
says. So therefore
when we do that you create what they
would call today good vibes.
You create good vibes and automatically
a lot of stuff would fall would fall
would fall would fall aside you know. So
let let us focus on that which is the
idea of the tishvat the pleasure and
delight the gishmach in davening and if
you're wondering and I conclude you know
but I don't have that gishmach so what
do they say there are three things that
if you don't have enough you have to
have more
if you say and uh you know you're not uh
not intoxicated but you don't get freak
you need more
and Um, if you learnis and you're not
turned on to Hashem, then you need to
learn moreidus.
And the third one, I'll I'll I'll give
my version of the third one for now, is
if you dab and and your dening is not
turning you on. You have to d with more.
You have to d with more.
I have a great shabas.
>> Number four.
>> No.
>> Fourth one. You know what the fourth one
is?
>> You fake it till you make it.
>> Yeah, fake it till you make it. Uh,
that's okay. It's one version.
>> HAVE A GREAT CHABAS EVERYONE. WE'LL SEE
EVERYONE NEXT MONDAY. Take care.