Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Hechaltzu chptr 18a- Synthesis of Plurality & Singularity, Maamar Chasidus vs Essay- RC Dalfin
16 views
Categories:Torah/Chassidus
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
So good day. We're learning the
rabb
the
set in 1898
and we're on page 138 139 in the uh one
one lessons in lessons inu
introduction to chapters 18 to 20. Those
that have a previous edition would be
page 133.
Let's let me read this.
There's a common saying knowing the
ailment is half the cure.
Only when an ailment is recognized and
understood can it be treated.
Nevertheless, this awareness is only
half in italics the cure. There must
also be a working therapeutic remedy for
healing to occure to occur.
In the first 17 chapters of
the Reb identified the ailment
highlighting the problem of Yeseshus of
ego and the baseless hatred that results
from it
and
explaining how harmful those
characteristics can be to a person and
to a community. From chapter 18 onward,
the Reb Rashab spells out the remedy.
Okay, this he does so he does by
following a classic axiom inus.
Every concept in a in hands on divine
service has a paralleled
incala
the abstract comprehension of godliness.
A thorough comprehension of the relevant
concept in the abstract inspires and
guides its practical application in
Avalda. This hill I would say is an
axiom an ethos of kabad. this last
sentence
that by understanding and really
comprehending
and learning like you like you learn a
piece of Gamora where you want to
understand the rash and tas
understanding the spiritual
aspect of the issue at hand and
therefore that in that that includes
knowing
somewhat of what kabas says about it and
what says because
are the two parts of the that delve into
the spiritual the spiritual in the sense
of the
but the mechanics of the kabola is pure
mechanics
applies the mechanics to inab
intellectual way so yes
the concept is not a ofidus
is brought in and other places etc which
is books of
right
you know levels all of that's found in
the zores
and the the kadesh and the kisariz
Vital's explanation of all these things
as much as
moder
etc
kind of systemize kabola but it's still
cababola it's still very much feels
cababalistic
then comes a longus the andim
And they take that and they break it
down more in avoid
most of the as we know did it through
the emphasis on the avoid on the heart
i.eid
In the world we call the other
meaning the emotional
one with one with gur one with the
ferris different orientations but all an
orientation of emotions
emphasizes the
and this is what he said over here at
the end of this last second paragraph
that that the the understanding the
parallel
of the issue of avoided that we get to
to to to that we're dealing with. So for
example, he'll in this case Yesesh and
how to get rid of it, right? So the
Rashab will now go up, not go down,
he'll climb upward. He's taking us for a
ride into the godhead.
And and and and the alterba
believes that you could that we common
people who are not sadikim regular
regular people regular yen we can
understand
more about the godhead how hashem
operates
and and not to shy away from it and say
wait wait wait wait wait again we're not
learning kapala now we're learning
And thi and this this is what he means
here. So this this line I thought this
sentence brought out very well the kabad
ethos. Continuing paragraph three.
>> Yeah. Thank you. I I I agree. It's very
it's very concise.
>> Yes. Yes. after defining Yeshus as the
anti antithesis of the of the oneness of
God's name
which we learned about before the
devotes the following chapters to
showing how unity can coexist
with diversity.
Not only does he call for oneness, he
explains the spiritual dynamics that
make it possible. In this way, he
provides us with guidelines upon which
we can model such unity in our divine
service. Hashem's name, Havaya,
is identified with godliness of an
utterly transcendent nature. By
contrast, the name Elohim
is identified with the godliness that
permeates the world, bringing it into
being and granting it life. Thus, the
name Elleim
is the source of the plurality that
pervades the created realms. To enable a
plurality of created beings, the divine
energy filtered through the name Elohim
must vary. It must be enclosed within
each created being and adapted to it
according to its specific nature. And
because the name Elikim represents the
various life forces within each element
of existence, that name appears in a
plural form, Elohim, not Elohai, Elohim.
By contrast, Hashem's name, Havaya, is
transcendent. It reflects a level of
existence at which no distinction
between entities is apparent. That's why
it is singular.
Nevertheless,
it is the name Havaya
that is the ultimate source of all
existence.
If so, it is clear that diversity also
exists in potentia
within the name Havaya
itself. Indeed, each of his four letters
represents a distinct spiritual dynamic
and is manifest in one of the four
spiritual worlds of Tils, Bria, its
different levels define the structure of
all existence. However,
in in the name of Havaya, all four
levels exist in a state of perfect
synthesis and unity. So, this is a very
important point. It's not the
from the perspective of plur plurality
doesn't exist.
When we say that it exists in potentia,
THEN IT EXISTS.
IT'S IT'S not in in manifest but it's in
potential potential.
So that's what he's saying. Cuz as soon
as you say youth v you're addressing the
yud of what
as it as it will be ultimately perceived
in the world.
So the of is as he says here so
eloquently it's not that it doesn't
exist it exists in potentia and
therefore however it's in perfect
synthesis and unity
and that is the ultimate the and and ho
that's the difference between hashem
and hashem
I'm sure you've learned this
yah means The only one, right? E means
one, which means you can count two and
three. And we say precisely. And which
is greater? Not.
Why? Because y
excludes
two and three and four. It excludes
plurality.
No. Okay. Big deal. It it's like you
know I'm going to lock myself away
somewhere and not have anything to do
with the world.
You know the expression they would use
they still use sometimes a sadic and
pelts. You've heard the expression
right? that sadi he appel says in Russia
they had these fur you know heavy coats
for the winter
and he puts it ON HE COVER HIMSELF IN in
in in this a person does so and he
doesn't think about everyone else who is
freezing cold but he he he has the pelts
on him that's what a sadic is so the
expression IS HE'S A SADIC IN PELTS IN
OTHER WORDS HE'S A SELFSERVING
sadic which means he's an egotist Okay,
AS GREAT AS IT'S A COMPEL listen
we first should reach and then get to
but we're talking about in in concept
is
exclusive of plurality. What's the
There's
sides of the world
seven heavens and the earth and they're
ALL INCORPORATED in al if of
so when we say that that means there is
and there is
and they're both incorporated in
potentia in alf that's aes
that means that the energy the energy is
so powerful
and that it's able to tolerate and more
than tolerate to include in a tolerate
is not the right word to include in a
positive way the and the dalid and to
bring unity into that that's a
tremendous
so it's
you know for a CEO of a company
to to exclude people who aren't kind of
his in his way of thinking is not a big
deal because you're the boss. You could
do it. The greatish is to bring people
in who don't have your way of thinking
and yet somehow you have them all be
part of the company and and go along
with the whatever you know you feel
needs to be. So that's the So the Reb
says over here the note is saying here
that that's the that's the the
novelty of of Havaya
versus Elohim.
Elohim is the energy of Hashem that is
guided by plurality. In other words,
plurality
controls elikim in a way. How much
godliness is given to the world from the
perspective of elikim? Whatever the
subject ma matter requires and needs or
doesn't need.
Hav is not you're not the subject matter
doesn't decide buddy
I decide
but I decide taking you into
consideration into my world I bring you
into my world
and in my world I find a way of you also
manifesting my world that's
continue.
Since the life energy emanating from
God's name Havaya passes through the
name Elohim,
Hashem Elohim,
the implicit diversity becomes actually
revealed.
However, because Havai and Elohim are
truly one, even the distinct created
beings whose separate identities stem
from the filter of Elohim are
characterized by the absolute oneness of
the name Havaya.
So just to clarify a point that he says
here, when Vaf
goes through the filter of of Elohim,
that's when we have manifestation.
on its own is too awesome to manifest,
right?
But Elohim is that energy of Hashem that
lends itself to manifestation.
So you would think that VK when it goes
through Elohim, it's then shackled by
Elohim.
And what we say is no Hashem
that ultimately ultimately and this is
the and the and the is to realize that
yes Hashem
needs Elohim for manifestation but
manifestation shouldn't be the
limitation of VK you hear the
in other words IT'S LIKE I HAVE to I
have to depend on you for whatever yet
right that thing that I have to depend
on you for whatever that is shouldn't
define me doesn't define me
V IS NOT DEFINED BY MANIFESTATION
because as soon as you say vfk is
defined by manifestation it's no longer
yud vki
havaya
I'm sorry. And let's continue the last
sentence. And by saying
in the
we highlight the unity of all created
beings.
That's what we're saying here.
What does he refer to? We highlight the
unity of all created beings. The fact
that in essence they are all permeated
by the singularity of God's essence.
That's the novelty
of Hashem
over even
in in in the Hashem part of the Schma,
we don't emphasize
the singularity
of Havaya
as it as even as it manifests in Elohim.
Hashem Elou you would say is the Elohim
kind OF HAVING THE UPPER hand over.
In other words, the manifestation
is and the is is is ancillary is whereas
ine
there we say that there's there and
they're all including the olive and
which is in the the
so the is a lot more uh deeper and
powerful and ultimately
more the kavana the purpose the purpose
now
although this was just a a written note
by the publishers
this idea over here
good morning good day this idea over
here is is
a a a very
important and discussed idea idea in
at length in in in discourses. This
mimemer that we're learning is one of
the
places where it's discussed
at length. There's another mimer. Maybe
>> what
>> do you know the uh the person who who
did this
Eliu Tower?
>> Of course I know him.
He lives today in Boca Ratan. He used to
live in Harov and before that in u in
Brooklyn. He's a genius.
>> Okay.
>> I I know him. Yeah. So,
>> yes. But but
I just want to say that there's another
mimer of the Reb Ashabad where this is
discussed if if my recolle if my memory
serves me well from my youth years and
that is um the mimer called um
Musk
it the mime was said by the reb
in 1896 probably the English 8
>> two years before this one
>> two. Yeah, cuz this was said 1898.
This one was said in 1896.
It's in Hebrews,
which would be 1897. I I don't remember
now what para it was. So it's either
it's 96 or 97, but be um it was said in
Moscow. So byidim it became known as
Vodita Musave. Muskav is that the
Yiddish or I don't know the velvet tell
us if that's the way the Russians
pronounce it but it that's the mimer and
in that mimemer he talks I believe also
about this concept of Hashem and Elohim
the energy of each and the and in a
sense the difference and then their
synthesis
and he you know he brings other concepts
and kayaku
But um here
>> the other words from the rashab was the
one on right
>> the yeah but that that that's a
different that's a
it's not like a it wasn't a massid
it was a an essay on education
>> okay
>> you know
>> difference
>> what
>> explain the difference
>> the diff the the difference says
in Kabad tradition the belief is is a a
saying
is is inspired by
and it comes out through the mouth of
the of the
so it's not a it's not to be looked at
as a ppull a dissertation.
In other words, there can be things in a
mimer that maybe on the face of it
doesn't doesn't um correspond with maybe
a rashi, a this or that, a piece, right?
Because that's not that's not the focus
of the mind. The mind is a it's
divinity.
It's divinity as as as the The divine
inspires the sadic who then releases it
by reciting it or at times writing it.
Okay.
Later on the people who hear it
translate it and transcribe it.
That's another that's another experience
that is not equal to the t to the actual
recitation coming from the holy mountic.
That's why
many times when I asked the khaz to
review a mimeis in sh in different shs
over my life I if it's a mimer that the
rebba said I will listen we have at
kabad.org or they have the myim. I'll
listen to the Reb's voice a few times if
I can. A to remember certain key words
that I hear him emphasize so that when I
review it, I can share that and and B it
to me to me to us to
that is the ems, right? Once it's
already transcribed,
it's going through the filter of the
transcriber. Now in every generation,
there were great including our
generation of Yan who were completely
dedicated and had the head and memory
and understood the mimer the correct
way. Just like the alterb that theic
writes on the cover page of Tyra which
you you've learned both of you if you
take a look on the cover page it says
there alterba did not write his own. Do
you know that he said to myim and his
brother his brothers
and one or two
they put it in writing.
They wrote down and that says that they
were
they were
able and trustworthy and to
write down what they heard. In other
words, they didn't add their own words
because if they add their own words,
it's not the Reb's m.
IT MIGHT BE A VERY NICE DISSERTATION,
it's not divine. So, we are now making
it I'm glad you brought this up.
Although it's a tangental point but
we're making a distinction between elus
which we in English is divinity and
nonus
which is galdic great mind but not
divine.
So the mimer aimed
in tradition is a divine communication.
The
was never said as a mimer. It it was
never said. It was a written document
that the saw was necessary for his
yeshiva. He had teachers. He had
students and in particular he introduced
in in a in a way that it belongs in a
yeshiva curriculum which never had had
been done before.
Right? So he saw that he needs to really
explain it. So the
that you refer to is a I call it an
essay an essay that's you know very
organized and and and very important but
it's not you know not aidus now truth be
told it could be that sometimes it's
called that I don't recall I have to
look at the the heading and and then I
have to verify if the rebba himself
wrote the heading and but but To my
knowledge
at this point, it's it's it's a it's a
essay written. So I don't believe it has
that it's not that divinity that we're
talking about where a reba reveals a
mimer. In other words, and and here's
another point. Our tradition believes
that whenus
he includes in there everything you need
at that time and the world needs and he
reveals it and sometimes we pick it up
and sometimes we don't pick it up
probably more times than others we don't
but in other words it's the way Hashem
says to the sadic all subconsciously
like this the world needs this right now
just and and he has it go through the
sadic and then
you know and and the story holed that
and I'll finish with this not with the
story but about the story in 1953 when
Stalin died
the Reb was sitting in Brooklyn Purim
and he said to myim
and and they say that around the time
when he said the mimemer and he told
over the story of hurah hooray HOORAY
HURAH HURAH HURAH lababatureba seems to
making theatrics in 770 Brooklyn
Kronheits
like what is this a show it's purim this
is the labavichb's way of doing purik
kabad that wasn't kabad style of purim
by the way I told you that rael once
said you know leave the for tishabove
and S and and the seriousness for Purim
Purim Kabad wasn't a day of silliness.
It you know it's it's a happy day but
it's not a day of making yourself a fool
you know and in in all manners. So, so
the Neba surely didn't uh you know do
theatrics but nevertheless he did that
and it WAS AT THAT TIME THAT STALIN'S
ROCK DEAD. Stalin was announced dead
right. So again what we believe and no
one can prove it to you. We can just
give the facts and then take it the way
is that HASHEM WANTED STALIN TO DIE
AROUND then he was he was he was an
enemy making such problems. Shashem
revealed a certain
went through the mayus
and the results were the results. And I
personally had another story which I've
told you and I believe it's the same
thing even though it wasn't a mimer when
we were in Marin County and Hilo knows
about Marin County
you know we had a kabad house a shul and
our neighbors some were you know were
they were very upset cuz there wasn't
even a church in the 538 planned
community. There's no church and there's
going to be a shul.
It was a big fight. Okay, I'm not going
to go into the details. I've shared them
with you some. Anyway, I wrote about it.
I have a whole book about it called
Kabad House. So,
so
one Sunday the Reb was giving out
dollars
and my father you've met uh Velv. He's a
a Jew from Romania. He never landed in
this country. So he he the way he spoke
he speaks to the Reba and his it's
different than us Americans, you know.
It's like, you know, and also where he
comes from, it's like, you know, you
talk to him and you you exchange us
Americans, we were trained, you know, by
our teachers like, you know, the
reverence, you keep quiet. You know what
I'm saying?
So So my father bends over with me when
the Reb is giving us dollars. we have
this on video and and he says to my
father, "My son who has a kabad house
has terrible
problems that that uh uh is being made I
don't know if she he said by a woman
who's always finding she was the
secretary for the homeowners association
and whenever she was able to make
trouble for us she did by writing in
their weekly NEWSPAPER OH KABAD KIDS
threw uh the stones into the pool. KABAD
CHILDREN STEPPED ON THE FLOWERS. You
know, this was edging on the people. So
people read that were such terrible
people, right? So my father, I don't
know if he got into the details. I don't
think he did. He just said, "My son's
having, you know, in
which means terrible sorrows."
And he's and he's asking the devil for
So the Reb gave a braha. The Reb gave us
a that was Sunday. I came back to
California.
I think on Wednesday, Tuesday or
Wednesday, I think Wednesday. I got off
the plane. I called over and they said,
my secretary, whoever said to me, "Did
you hear the news?" I said, "What news?"
The secretary had a massive heart attack
yesterday and she died.
43 years old,
two days after the Reba gave the braha.
Okay, now
these are the facts. Whether you one
believes it's because of the Reb's braha
or not, that's everyone's choice. But
the fact is that she was 43. Fact is she
had a massive heart attack and she died
two days after the death. Right? So the
Reba didn't curse her. The Reb gave a
braha to after hearing the Torus that
I'm having for the Kabad house and it
was really her who was the core figure
again and I don't I'm not I I have to
check listen I'm not sure my father said
there's a lady that's causing it. It
might have been that he didn't even say
that but that's the bottom line. So what
why what am I saying? What I'm saying is
that even words that come out of a sadic
DON'T HAVE TO BE, HEY, I'M GOING TO
CURSE THIS. BY THE WAY, THERE WERE
certain sadikim hill that did use this,
you know, kind of
cursing the enemy.
They say the ribba,
you know, with different stories of of
that was not Jewish and godly, you know,
he would write the name and throw it
into fire and the person was gone. that
there's such stories. But this wasn't
the Reb's approach. It wasn't really the
lab approach. The approach was to be
to draw down light. And the more light
you draw down, the more light you draw
down,
Hashem will keep score and do this. So
this is a little bit to explain the
difference between and
on one hand how
is the inclusion of andal in the alif
which is the you which means that the
is the synthesis of plurality
that's the idea we'll learn tomorrow
have a great day
>> I won't be here tomorrow but I hope to
be there
Okay, good.
We'll see you. Drive safely. Shalom.
>> Bye-bye. Take care. Take care. Byebye.
Thank you.