0:00 / 0:00
Rabbinic Aristocracy or Nepotism | Rabbi Shai Finkelstein | July 8 2025
88 views
www.ouisrael.org facebook.com/ouisrael #OUisrael #torah #judaism #torahlectures
Categories:
Torah
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Hello everyone. Okay. So, uh first would
like obviously to um dedicate
by their families in memory obviously of
Mel and Sylvia David.
Hello everyone.
Welcome back to everyone who was away
and uh we are on page four. So
uh sorry three three
four
three page three page three yeah page
three what we saw last week was the
following anyone needs another one
I think they are outside
thank you
okay so what we saw the last few weeks,
we spoke about nepotism or aristocratia.
Uh we spoke about Mosher Rabenu wanting
to have a successor and he preferred his
own children. And then to his surprise
or maybe not to his surprise, God told
him uh no we will take someone else. And
we spoke about why is this someone else?
And then we start talking about is there
is something in halaka that basically
dictates requires uh expects that really
the successors will be the children and
we said the answer is yes but he needs
to be worthy. He needs to be worthy not
necessarily only in wisdom but more in
what? Ina mind. And we spoke about that.
So that's what we spoke last week as
well. So now take a look and and then we
sorry we started with Rabzar and Rabi
Joshua and we spoke about the the first
merit rebellious of the Talmid against
Raan Gaml they removed him from the from
his presidency. However in the process
of finding a replacement
even though Rabosa
was definitely a great pick they didn't
want him. Why? because he was the baliva
and then Rabaka was the scholar but he
did not have
a did not have and therefore they
skipped over him as well and they took
Benazar that is very great guy but he's
also 10th generation tora
so that's what we saw last week okay so
take a look at this story in the
in the
page Page three, the last source.
There's a story about one student.
So, as you know,
there's no question. It's a it's an
obligatory
especially if you say that
which means that we're created in
corresponding to the so we know that
invitan.
What do we do? We just burn the
leftovers and therefore
is not obligatory. It's rash. We
accepted it upon ourselves but it's
basically rash. So what I told you that
was after it was decided. Okay. Now we
are talking about the time that it was
before the decision. So someone come and
came and asked Yeshua what about
is obligatory or not?
Not obligatory.
So then the same as
what do you think is
or obligatory or nonobligatory? Uh you
know this is a Talmid who wants to
create a bit of a
a bit of a of let's call it a fireworks
between between the two. So
says it's obligatory
Yeshua in a shoot. He says, "But you
know your friend Raua says it's a
non-obligatory. So you know make up your
mind. Someone needs to make up his
mind."
So he told this said to that student,
"You know what? Tomorrow when we get
into the B midrash, you ask this
question. is obligatory or
non-obligatory.
So the next day comes
so this student stood up and says uh I
have a question is obligatory or
nonobligatory.
So is the head of the Sanhedrin. He's
the one to give the answer. He says
obligatory.
So the Talmid publicly says
you want to talk about
you think that everything was you know
in the past was so nice and gentle. You
have a tal in front of everyone says to
you say obligatory says nonobligatory.
By the way, you know who was that?
According to some sources,
interesting. Okay.
[Music]
You're the one who says that it's
nonobligatory.
Love. No. No. I didn't say that.
See your faces. Yes. Yes. It's okay to
react like that. What do you mean? You
just said yes. Okay.
Stand up. And this time it says he asked
you. So they will testify that you said
it's nonobligatory. So you are not
exactly saying the truth.
So sat down and gave a lecture and was
standing
and it's obviously it's embarrassing.
It's embarrassing. It's humiliating to
Rabi Yeshua. So they pressured spit who
was the translator to tell him let the
people go. So will stop talking and will
stop standing.
You see the is very elaborate much more
elaborate than the bubbly
is not like it's goodbye.
So he says to them says tell the people
to what to all stand. So not only Yeshua
but everyone can stand.
So then what did they do?
They removed
the evil doing that you did is gone. We
are done with you.
So
the always said that he was how old?
18. 18. Here it says 16.
and his hair became gray. So he looks
old in the bubbly. It's about what?
The beard, not the hair. Okay.
Now take a look at that.
That we don't have in the
basically said
and he was said why.
It's not that because of
smarter than me or is more of a sageim
but rather because he has whatus.
This is why I was not chosen to be the
head of the Sanhedrin because I don't
have
praiseworthy is the person that is that
has
and praiseworthy is a person who has a
anchor to hold on to meaning from his
ancestors.
What was his
which means we're not sure anything
about
father but we know for sure that his
great great great great grandfather was
Ezra and therefore even a 10th
generation
will be good for now. Now if I would
stop here for a second first and
foremost what do you see here that again
is obviously something that they took
into consideration. Okay.
B and that's might might be even more
interesting
is
that it seems to be that
can skip generations
which means again we don't know anything
about Azaria.
We know about we have nothing to do with
Aaria
and still because he was 10th generation
to Ezra
he got the job. Now
isn't that interesting
that I will put it like that if I was
so says that he was said
it it hurt him that he was not chosen
but he justified it by saying what
is something very important right
so what's the message that is trying to
convey to us
is very important. But you know someone
needs to be the first
which means
who was Benim according to the tradition
meaning his ancestors were converts and
there was no in terms of
Rabaka was the be the first one in his
family
to create to start creating.
Okay.
So in a way especially in the second
century we are talking here about the
second century all the tanim are here
from the second century already after
probably the destruction of the beta
mikdash
so which was in 70.
So you have you need to try some kind of
a balance between what between
but also the new movement of that even
if you don't have you are still consider
as
you with me meaning if you send a
message only so if I don't have one why
should I even bother right I'm not going
to study I'm not going to do anything I
will never get anything so why why do I
care however if I totally denyot
or ignores everyone understand that is
something important and why you saw
something at home some of the things
that your ancestors did and they were
not rewarded yet in their time maybe you
will get the reward meaning the idea is
also you were trained by them probably
or maybe so the idea of versus your own
uh I don't know personal accomplishments
we'll put it like that is Definitely
something that Raaka is trying to what
he's trying to emphasize. He's trying to
focus on what
and to develop. That's true. Yes. So
that's the
Oh, okay. What do we know about Rabbi
Ka's children?
Okay.
Right. So there is an agada that his
daughter was at the day of her marriage.
She took a needle and she put it in the
wall and she killed a snake.
And why did she did do it? Because at
the day of her wedding when everyone was
busy with makeup and all of that, she
gave uh bread to the poor and she was
saved by death. And why? Because the
astrolog astrologologist told Rabaka
that his daughter will die at the day of
her wedding. Sounds like a Cinderella,
right? And um and then she took the
needle, okay, and she put it in this uh
in the thing. And then then she killed
the snake. So she he has a daughter.
Okay. What else do we know about
children? Gished.
Clue.
Ben Zuma
who we're not sure. I think he was like
his son was supposed to be son-in-law.
He did not really married his daughter.
He also he says
he didn't get married. So we don't know
too much about
uh
to some extent it's a bit sad.
Yes,
there's a famous statement
that's an alternative
might but
he basically says that says that if
someone teaches um others they can be
considered like his own children. Now
that that's beautiful but everyone wants
to have his own. Yes.
children.
No, he might. I don't know. He might
because there are some Ben Rablazar, but
I don't know if that's Benazar or not.
There are many also when it can bear it.
It can be
benazar just so we we don't know really.
Um but that's the rushi. Now it's
interesting that the usami is more
elaborated than uh than the bavi and
also adds this interesting idea of
okay now now let's talk a little bit
about and some interesting questions. So
these
16th century in Israel says the
following.
If you your position is to be the rabbi
of that city or in the city
even if you basically took over a
position without being elected or
without being asked. Do you know people
like that? They're just taking a
position and they said that they were
appointed. You don't know anything about
it. Okay. Interesting.
You are not allowed to remove him from
his position.
Even though there is someone who is
greater than him,
even his son or his grandson are taking
precedent over someone else from the
outside.
And the condition is that they will
replace their their parents with what
with god-fearing um
abilities or or whatever attributes
and there also needs to be a bit smart
and in a places that what that you have
that you basically have a rabbi based on
a contract which means five years, seven
years, three years, two years, whatever
it
Oh, they have a a choice to make. They
have elections.
They are allowed to remove him after
that time.
But if they accepted it, accepted him
upon themselves, they cannot get rid of
him.
cannot fire a rabbi
unless
unless and the the unless of the list is
very long. Okay, so that's what the says
okay 16th century is so take a look at
um and he says the following
he was asked about one of the rabbis
that they wanted to remove and if he
says the following
The question that he was asked was the
following. The rabbi died probably or
retired and his son
wanted to take over and the father
wanted the son to take over
but the kahal the congregation
do not like him.
He says even though you have a right
it's probably not the right thing to do.
No, no. You the the the son, you have
the right to take over the position of
your father, but if the congregation
don't like you,
we're going to do it anyway. Yeah. So,
it's not going to work. So, step down.
Let someone else do it.
So theam says like that. So what do we
have? The rabbi died. There is a son.
Says if the son is not likable,
the congregation do not like him. He
shouldn't step in. He should step down.
But if the kahal wants him, they like
him.
Even if they like him only in order to
what to appease the dead father and
there is someone else who came to town
and he is a great
we tell this great what find a different
city
now this is an interesting thing
because let's think about it let's say
the other rabbi is a mamesham
a great scholar so he will elevate the
city right he will teach people more and
so who cares about this
Why do you think it is so important to
keep that the son if the congregation
wants him that he should be the rabbi
not the other guy
tradition
stability
it's better to deal with
the rabbi you know you mean the rabbi
you know rather than the rabbi that you
don't know right okay now the problem is
the fair of the lot.
No, no. Two options. Two options. He
says two options. If they if they don't
like him, he shouldn't. If they like
him, even if the other guy is smarter,
so they should keep you. Now, I want to
ask you a question. It's a tricky
question. Be careful.
Who was
the most
stable leader in the world? I mean, the
head of a government, the head of a
country.
um that he was met never replaced until
he died.
Stunning. No, but years. Years. Talking
about many many years. No, like
more than 30 years.
Fidel Castro.
Do you know Fidel Castro?
Okay.
Oh, he did it with the army. He was a
dictator, right? One like many others.
But he was able to survive for I think
40 years or something like that. Now
stability for sure knowing the devil
that you know for sure. What did he do
to his country?
He destroyed this country which means
stability is a good thing but at the
same time it's also a barrier a barrier
for what? full of change
which and progress, development in
creativity, innovation,
which means it's good to have a rabbi
that you know his father and his
grandfather and yo when he spoke he
reminded me of his grandfather wonderful
but who says it's good for the community
in a way even with Moshe
was not the right leader to what to lead
the Jewish people into the land of
Israel, which means there is a balance
here that the rabbis try to address. On
one hand,
stability, honor,
you know, the business, all of that is
good.
At the same time, it's not necessarily
be um going to be what? Something that
will help the congregation.
In addition,
what do you do? And that we have
I don't know a lot but you can hear
about it inot
when you have more than one worthy son
or son-in-law
and then
and then sometimes you open up his own
somewhere else or there is a fight
which both options are not exactly in
favor of the Jewish people.
So we obviously understand if you
remember what we saw in one of the
sources that Rebi before he died he got
all three of his kids and he told him
okay you are but you should not be a
leader you are a leader you are not
thatam you are this you it's very hard
so sometimes it's good to start from the
beginning you just start from the
beginning you got a new guy and let him
do it but at the same time there is some
kind of rashiv to have something that
you had before So um so that was theam.
Now take a look at chudin now p turn to
page five
turn to page five. So this is
that coin
says the following
meaning that is the acceptable
Okay. Basically says every appointment
I don't know what else
whatever it is when you are appointed
it's for life and then you can basically
give it to whom? to your children and
and based on yusha the oldest and then
the next one. Now
if we go with this to the extreme
what do you have?
Nepotism. Exactly.
That's the list of my problems. You know
what's my main problem with that
is that I will never be able to break
into that circle because even if you are
the sages and your son comes after you
will never get a job unless you open up
a new community a new city which means
Rafuk and it's very interesting this is
uh 20th century beginning of the 20th
century he basically says if you
received an appointment it's for life
and you can basically give it to your
children. Now take a look at it. I don't
know if you were aware or not but when
you become a chief rabbi of a city or a
judge it's really what
it's for life. Now part of the issue was
that uh I think the wrote for bagats the
the appeals to bagat to the supreme
court was let's make it like a term
limit of 10 years and then every 10
years it will be an election
they are for eight eight 10
years and um so on one hand I think that
there is need to be some kind of a of a
of time that they need to know that they
are there because if not they will
always be what busy in trying to be
reelected you can't do a job okay that's
part of the problem I think in Congress
in Congress every two years or two
years
okay so the congressman's every two
years they are being elected the minute
the mean the meaning is the minute they
got elected they're starting their
campaign so when do you have time to
walk you know between in between So it's
not good. You need to have some kind of
time that you know you are there you can
put your mark now how many years it can
be three it can be five it can be seven
but after whatever years we can agree on
there is need to be some kind of a term
why because you get too comfortable and
then you say okay the same programs I
did the first year I will do the second
year the third year and you know what
maybe the same shoe I'll give the next
semester too right
why should I prepare new ones just gave
you the same thing. I'm going to stop
becoming lazy.
Why? Because my job is secured. Every
person knows that if you want to be if
you want to develop yourself, you need
to know that there is some kind of
uncertainty regarding your job. That is
in every other profession.
Besides
what are the professions that after you
reach the point you don't need to worry
too much
supreme courts are there for life
professors in the university after you
get the 10 years the 10 or 10 whatever
you are there unless you did something
horrible you are there basically
sometimes you can just recycle the same
over and over and over unless you can
stand yourself doing it. Yes.
What's it like to do?
Thank you.
But you know what, Lifka? I can't do it
to myself. That's the problem.
Oh, no. This was a joke. She said that I
can repeat I will repeat that joke too.
I will that I can repeat the same
classes because you will not not
everyone will remember. Let's put it
like that. Yes.
Okay. So, I'm not going to repeat the
question. So, so the thing Yes. So,
yeah. Kingdom. So, the question is what
about kingship? Kingship or kingdom?
kingdom goes from one generation to
another.
Yeah. But there it's different
for a while meaning Yeah. only for the
generation.
No, no, not only that.
stays in the family
stays in the family. But there I can
understand why I don't have any problems
with it. I need to have it's not so much
about it's about being trained as a
king. You need to be groomed as a king.
So you need to live in in a palace.
Musher Rabenu for example was put in
that palace. Why? So he will be um
accustomed to how to act like a king. He
couldn't be a slave. Mosher Rabenu. How
can I get commandments from a slave who
slept the same bricks with me? Like who
are you? But he was in the palace. He
looked like an Egyptian. So I can hear I
can hear what he has to say. So I can
understand why it should be.
There are certain people who were more
deserving and would have been made
better kings than the children of
uh probably not. Yeah, that's what it
seems to be. That's what it seems to be.
Schlam was chosen was handpicked by God
and then who was supposed to get it he
made a he made the wrong choice. I mean
whatever God determined for him but he
made the wrong choice. So Kuna also if
your father is a coin your grandfather
is a coin you are a coin even a million
dollar to the rabbi will not change it.
So the thing is what is that with these
two I can understand because it does not
affect me but
you would think that what
everyone can pick it up right and here
you say that basically by the
appointments this entire
is closed in in the door is closed for
me if I don't come with my ancestors
it's closed
so but that's what Rafuk says of says
that's and that's what you need to do
after
children.
I don't think he had I I don't know. I
don't think he had children.
He thought not only that it's fair, it's
the
Yeah. and he and he bring all the sauces
the ramb
now
I would
mama
it's not very democratic it's by just
it's not that democratic and also by the
way just as a side note at that time
there was a question about um in the
need if women can vote
yeah don't look at me like that
and ruff Ruff Cook was against it.
Cook.
Yeah.
By the way, Raf Cook was not such a
maker in many things. He was uh
sometimes he understood the reality but
in his and things like that you don't
find too many cool
raum
the what
husband and wife
no they cancel each other
so um no there are sources that uh a
woman should not be elected to any
position And uh that's what the Rambam
says. Now obviously the democratic world
changed things and we found a way to to
be but look what was the city that you
came from from what kind from what state
did you come? When did you make aliyah?
When
from when and where
New York Okay. When what was the year
that women in America were allowed to
vote?
Women were allowed to vote in America.
America Democratia when 100 years ago
maybe
in the 20s. 100 years ago. Yeah. Okay.
No.
Yeah. So, uh we progressed even before.
Okay. Good. Now,
Raovia
Ravadia has a different question.
Interesting question.
Interesting question. There is a rabbi
who wrote a book and he basically
ordered his children to publish it. Now
when you publish a book and you start
selling it, you obviously get hopefully
someone is going to buy it and they're
going to pay, right? So there are some
uh there is a profit. So there are two
children let's say for for our case
there are two children one is the and
the other one is the second one. Okay
the question is is the get double in the
prophets.
Now you would say sure
which means only in things that are now
here in front of me
it takes double but in things that will
come later he does not. So for example,
let's say there is a a manaya a stock
okay that uh in the stock market okay
that the father invested and it will
expire only let's say three months from
now and the father is already dead. Is
that money considered as
potential money or it's already here
because we all know in three months many
things can change. It can go up it can
go down whatever it is here you have
what the kav the the book is already
written but it was never sold. So now
they need to publish it and to start
selling it. Is that considered as
something that is already here or this
is something that will come in the
future? And that obviously the
ramification is is the takes double. So
he says
we'll explain in a minute.
So he says like that. He says the two
opinions are like that. One opinion says
sure he has the ability to be mish
prophets to his firstborn. Why? Because
the Torah that I learn is mine. So if
it's mine, it's mine and I can give it
to you. The other rabbi, the other
opinion says when we say that when you
learn Torah, it's becoming yours. It
means just what? That you can be
that you can be if someone
hurt me. Yeah. Insult me. I can be say
okay whatever. Even though you insulted
my Torah, I can still be but it doesn't
mean that what that it's mine in terms
of what that I can sell it. Okay? So
it's not yours. Now do you see what's
going on here? We spoke about what
appointments
when you get an appointment when
appointment when you get an appointment
for a rabbitic position or whatever it
is it's yours and it's for your
children. Now we are talking also after
someone is dead
and he produced something Torah can he
be this of the prophets in the Torah to
his children.
Okay,
one more
uh at least for today
also had a very interesting question. By
the way, look at the date.
So, how many years ago?
close to 50 47 years ago. And what's the
Hebrew day there?
Interesting. What's the question? The
question is like that. A rabbi became a
rabbi without being appointed.
How does it work? You have a minion and
then you have a guy who ds and then
there's okay m you have seven minutes
between or 10 minutes, 15 minutes.
People start talking, start talking,
whatever it is. The guy comes along and
says, "Let me let's learn Mishna." Oh,
let's build is always good. Okay,
learning Mishna. First Sunday, Monday,
Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday on
Shabbat. There's no rabbi in the
congregation. He goes up. He says, "You
know what?" He goes to the gabba. He
says, "You know what? Maybe I will can
say a few words of sure." And then it
goes after a year or two. And he becomes
what the rabbi. After a few years, the
congregation says, "We want to have
First, a search committee. You can't
have a sh without a search committee.
Who here was not on a search committee?
You went to shu.
Okay. So, a search committee, you need
to be on a search committee. And the
search committee is first and foremost
searching for themselves, right? They're
looking for what they want, what they
need, blah blah blah. Okay. So, then you
have candidates and they come for a
what? for refer. Okay, this rabbi is
laughing. He says, "I'm the rabbi of the
show."
No, no, no, no payment. Let's say no
payment, no nothing for now. If it was
paid, it can change it because it seems
to be they agree to something. Okay?
Even though even if they pay, they can
still say we paid for your time. We
didn't pay for your position as the
rabbi. But he after doing that, let's
say five years, he assumed he is he is
the rabbi. For sure he's the rabbi.
So
take a look. He described the question.
He says something interesting. He says
someone who's a is a scholar.
So you have a guy, you have a rabbi
there who is a scholar and he did it for
many, many years. And now the
congregation says, "What? I don't know
who is this guy. He's a nice guy, but we
want a rabbi."
So we the question is he says, "I'm the
rabbi. You can't fire me and you can't
bring someone else." And they said,
"What do you mean you are the rabbi? You
were never appointed." Okay. Now
we described it like that also can be
described in a different way. Sometimes
for a congregation to become in a
congregation takes years. At the
beginning it's like a young couple's
whatever and the sh is important but
it's not that important to start hiring
a rabbi whatever but they want some shim
and then there is a guy who comes along
gives some shim
between and whatever. And then it's
interesting they can also might think
see him as the rabbi but he's a rabbi in
the community. He's not the communal
rabbi the congregational rabbi the
pulpit rabbi. So we can understand how
things can get lost in the translation.
So the question is that function was
asked can they bring someone else or
really that position belongs to this
guy. So he says knew that he says it's
very simple in my opinion.
says this rabbi who was never appointed,
he doesn't need to be appointed. He was
and he is the rabbi of the congregation.
Why? Two reasons.
He says like that. He says I understand
the Rama says he says is based on the
Rama the Rama says
what does it mean
that he's the not necessarily that he
was appointed and there was a what do
you call it not an inauguration
installation yeah I always wanted to
call it coronation uh
yeah almost like a coronation from the
word keter
So um
so therefore says I don't need a an
installation coronation whatever it is
by the way installation is such a bad
use of language like you install the
rabbi like you install plumbing like I
don't know what
inauguration it's nice coronation it's
really nice
yeah But here it's like
installation installing
like you have like you have you have
something to fix like what am I a fixer
I'm a rabbi come on I'm a king
coronation
it's good that we can make fun of it
right so um fun off it and fun for but
um so the thing is he says so you don't
so even if you were not appointed it's
yours and then He says if the other
rabbi is very smart whatever you can
allow him to give shim but the
and the discretionary fund the programs
in the
rabbi of the community the rabbi of the
kahal
now so that's the first reason the
second ischech.
says he says especially when the knew
that he's there and
if they would tell him look you're going
to be the interm rabbi until we find
someone else
and they were very clear.
So here it says that they they didn't
they did not pay him and that's what he
did. So here he would say yes.
So I don't know it's a good question.
Here it says Shaimot
many years. I don't know what is many
years more than two less than 20 or
between 15 and 25. No idea. And but then
he says
that if they have not against this rabbi
then they should what?
Go to a bin, not ask him to leave yet.
Go to a bin
and present your claims and if the bait
would think that he is not worthy to be
a rabbi, they will remove him. And if he
they think that he is still worthy, you
are stuck with him. The only problem is
that with all and I will keep the other
two for the next time next next week we
don't have a sh only the following week.
I'm not here. Um so um
the problem that sometimes we have is
I'm not teaching maybe there's someone
else who's giving a shoe but I'm not
teaching
sometimes there is
a gap between
and reality and what do I mean by that
you have a rabbi you know what let's say
there is a beloved rabbi wonderful he
was there for 40 years. He married the
people. He gave names to their children
and grandchildren and he married them
and he buried their grandparent. He did
every wonderful rabbi. He died. His son
is also a wonderful person. Blah blah
blah. However, the sh changed
hashkafically,
educationally, socially, economically,
whatever it is.
And they want a new rabbi.
If they will go to a bathing, they're
going to lose.
But you want to tell me to be stuck with
a rabbi that I don't want.
What kind of a recipe for disaster that
can be?
That's what I'm saying. Sometimes there
is a gap between the halaka. I'm not
talking about if they have claims, valid
claims against the successor. He's
corrupt. is immoral. I'm not god forbid.
I'm not he's not he doesn't know how to
open. He doesn't know where to open it
for me. I mean I mean said I'm not
talking about that.
He's a nice guy. We like him. But he
doesn't fit to what we need today. We
want more. We want less tony. We want
with a beard, without a beard, with a
blackhead, with a white head. Whatever
it is, whatever congregation through the
years they change. Everyone changes. And
the question is in the name of stability
and honor, do you want to create
host hostility and animosity between
this poor guy and and the congregation?
Break away.
Okay, very good. And then you create a
breakaway and breakaways are never not
never I guess sometimes they were they
are not necessarily great news for
everyone for anyone. So what I want you
to think at least for another week is
here you have ala
and then you have reality and how do you
try to what to mitigate the gap and to
allow a smooth transition to the next
one
with the understanding that what that it
might be that the kahila needs some kind
of a of a change. I will throw to you
one idea that we do is a contract. In
the contract, when you do a contract
with the rabbi, you basically say,
"Okay, you have three years, five years,
seven years, whatever." And after three
or five years, you can say, "Look, we're
going to re-evaluate you." And the best
thing is to get receive a re-evaluation
every six months or every year in order
to understand what's going on. You know,
don't tell me after three years. Oh,
every day you tell me everything is
wonderful and after three years you tell
me what, get out. Right? So the idea is
is that you can do even if you don't
like that rabbi let's say the son of
that beloved rabbi you give him a
contract for I don't know two years
three years and then you do evaluation
that will be allowed and we will see
what's the basis for it but that we'll
discuss next