Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
[Music]
okay hi everybody and thank you thank
you for coming again it's good to see uh
more people coming back face to face it
was a little difficult sometimes
just to speak to a wall or just speak to
a an empty room
and i'm happy that that you're here uh
today shir is again
dedicated uh for a reforeshalema
we're very grateful for their support
and in addition the sponsor of the uh
ganshir family
lizekhar nishmas in memory of uh
benjamin yes well ben as
as all of you know uh we were praying
for him
for a year and a half and unfortunately
he was tragically taken from us
but the family is continuing uh to
dedicate many shiurim
uh that it should be the elevation of
his nishama
in ghanaiden and we hope that that will
will be the case he was a pure nishama
and
in some ways he will have a very very
great place in ganeden
he will have a very great place in
ghanaiden
even without the sectors the
should bring it even higher in addition
i think
all of our hearts are very very
distressed
over the tragedy that happened in the
miami area
with the collapse of the building so
many people died and so many bad people
are still
unaccounted for it is possible that
there may be survivors you know
no one ever knows but still this was
extremely
unusual type of events
it gives all of us really a great great
concern
for the medal that is in the world and
and we pray
that uh people will be found who will be
survivors and for those who did lose
loved ones uh they should be comforted
and uh
strengthened in their time of adversity
and challenge i don't know the breakdown
is it you or nanjo how many people uh
were victims but as as we know from our
tradition
uh we commiserate and we feel the pain
of all human beings
who suffer and they are in our thoughts
and uh and in our and in our prayers
uh so today's parsha is really a
continuation
of last week you have to read the end of
last week's parsha to understand the
beginning
of this week's project uh just to remind
you
last week this is the the 40th year of
the jewish people
they are poised to enter the promised
land
and you will recall that last week the
king of moab
hired bilaam a professional sorcerer
to destroy the jewish people by cursing
them
bilaam had a very good reputation as an
effective
cursor an effective sorcerer
and miraculously god changed all of his
curses into blessings
and when bilaam opened his mouth to
curse out came the magnificent blessings
of the jewish people in fact they
pursued that in the sitter at least many
people don't say it but
it's the first thing you say when you
walk into show matovo
yakov mishkin osaka israel
how good are your tents jacob and your
dwelling places israel
right that in the sitter is the first
thing you say when you walk into the
bait kinesat
those are none other than the words of
bilaam harasha
that god gave him so bilaam is now
leaving in disgrace
because bildum was hired for a job he
didn't do it
and bullock says get out of here as i
mentioned last week i don't have a full
answer did bullock get a refund on his
deposit
we don't really know what bilham's
policy was but balak basically says get
out of here you're a disgrace
but bilaam is so devoted to the cause
of hurting the jewish people that he
comes up with an alternative plan
he says you know the cursing thing
didn't work very well
okay but i have another idea
let's devise a strategy where the jewish
people will be entrapped in sin
in aveira in fornication in idolatry
let the daughters of moab come and dress
up in beautiful garments
and entice the jewish people both to be
promiscuous
with the daughters of moab and
ultimately to worship
the gods of moab and
indeed that took the vinod's moaf came
and they dressed up et cetera and they
were
israel and there was a plague
and jews were dying left and right and
actually 24 000 jews had died
and then in the eyes of the entire
congregation the head of the tribe of
shimon
or one of the heads one of the
distinguished leaders of the tribe of
shimon
zimri ben sallu publicly
publicly means literally outside
publicly
fornicates with a mid united princess
cosby bassoon
and people are crying the torah says
people are seeing a leader
doing something and nobody can stop this
this is how bad things have become
pinchas who is the son of al-azhar the
son of aram
takes a sword and he kills them both
and this is actually exemplary of a
certain halacha which theoretically even
applies today but i would not advise
people to automatically apply it
the halacha has some very very severe
limitations
and that is the following if a
jewish man is publicly now publicly
means
outside in the presence of people not in
not in a hotel room or in an apartment
but if a jewish man is having sexual
intercourse
with a non-jewish woman
in the eyes of the public
then if you are a zealous person we'll
have to define that
who is acting for the sake of god you
are allowed to kill them
but only as they used to call it in
texas
in flagrante delicto which basically
means
only while they are actually doing
the sexual act once they separate it
you're not allowed to punish them they
would have to be taken to court or
baited
or whatever it is so note that there are
gazillions of conditions here
number one it is limited to jewish men
with
non-jewish women actually not not even
the reverse number two
it must be out in the open public
number three it must only be while they
are
physically together not when they
separate
and number four which is the most
amorphous ambiguous qualification
you must be a person whose motives are
totally for the sake of god
now how do you gauge that that's very
very difficult that's kind of a
subjective test
but god knows which means an act
if all of these conditions are met it's
a mitzvah
but if you're not acting for the sake of
god you are a murderer
in other words it goes from one extreme
to another extreme
on one hand it could be the great merits
of saving on
israel on the other hand it could be one
of the worst sins of all
the sin of murder and in fact it's
brought down that if you ask ishaima you
are
let's say you ask your rabbi should i
kill these people
once you ask the answer has to be no
it's only
you're so motivated for the glory of god
and
what happened was pinchas stopped
the plague i mean imagine a raging
plague
that is going through ami israel and
pinchas was zealous for the glory of god
and he stopped the magefa
now that is actually at the end of last
week's persia
this week's parsha god says
because pinchas acted to be zealous for
my name
i will make with pinchas
covenant of peace
we see shalom we'll have to define that
term
and for us and to him to he
and his children afterwards there's a
covenant of
eternal priesthood
now just in terms of simple shots
it's not so clear what is god giving to
pinchas
that he didn't already have pinchas is a
cohen because his father is a cohen
and his grandfather is a cohen ira so
god is now telling pinchas
because of what you did i am making the
giving you the covenant of priesthood
pinchas is already occurring
right so what exactly is the extra thing
so rashi actually points out a very
fascinating point
pinchas was not a coin because again uh
what makes a colleen a cohen is that
he's born from a culling
but here's the thing aron himself was
not born a cohen right iron was not a
cohen when he was born
aaron was made of colleen because he was
anointed with
divine oil and given a divine mission
and de lazar and his some are around's
two remaining sons
because none of one of you died were
also anointed
so they become kohanim from their
anointing
and any children born after they're
anointed are children born from cohen's
who are kohanan but pinchas was actually
born from eldazor
before elazor was anointed a coin
so pinchas was not born a cohen
pinterest was born a commoner or
technically penthouse would be born a
laby
and when a lazar and our own were
anointed
pinchas was not yet anointed so the
gemara actually says
pinchas was not a cohen
until he killed zimri and that's what
god is saying god is saying now i will
make you a calling why is that
so hilariously it's a very interesting
thing because there actually is a rule
that if a cohen it applies even today if
a cohen
kills a person the cohen is not allowed
to recite the priestly blessing even if
it was an accident or whatever it was
so if pinchas would have killed zimri as
a kohen
he would have been disqualified and
therefore god deferred the kahuna of
pinchas
until after he killed henry but the main
point i want to talk about is
it's kind of anomalous that the bracha
that god gives pinchas
is a bracha of shalom peace
reconciling the ability to bring people
together with god and together with each
other
pinchas action is an act of violence yes
it was done the shame shamayim it was
done for the sake of god
but it's a little paradoxical and
counter-intuitive
that an act of violence and an act of
murder
should be rewarded by what is called a
brit
shalom
as meritorious as it might be with all
the conditions
is not an act of peace
so to fully understand this let's go
back a little bit
you know alexander pope once remarked
that you know people knock hypocrisy
people say hypocrisy is no good i don't
want to do things
because i'm a hypocrite but pope pointed
out that hypocrisy
is the tribute that vice
pays to virtue think about that a little
bit
a meaning a hypocrite understands
there's a certain
standard of behavior that's right so
even if in the privacy of his house he's
not able to live with that standard
he at least acknowledges that there's a
standard right that's the
what you might call the positive side of
being a hypocrite there's a lot of
negatives of course
but hypocrisy basically means you're
doing the right
thing even if you're doing it for the
wrong reason you might be doing it to
fool people
you might be doing it to deceive people
but at least you're acknowledging
a standard and there is something to be
said
for the acknowledgement of standards now
i don't want to editorialize into all
sorts of other issues but you know the
issue of gay marriage would be a
parallel type of idea they've all
there's always been there has always
been
uh the practice of homosexuality
throughout history
if the torah forbids it it's because
people were doing it
and people did it and people did it and
people did it and whatever it is you
know we're not interested in going into
people's bedrooms
but there still was an acknowledgement
that it wasn't
you know what god wanted so people did
it
today it's a very different orientation
where people want to change
and redefine what is right and what is
wrong and there is a fundamental
difference between
saying i'm doing something wrong but
it's too hard for me to change
that's one level and saying i'm
redefining the wrong
to be right same thing with
intermarriage um probably
the older people remember this you know
uh there was intermarriage
you know 50 years ago 100 years ago
whatever it would be
but if i was making a bar mitzvah and i
was going to invite my uncle harry
who was married to a non-jewish woman it
was understood as a matter of basic
etiquette basic politeness basic derek
eretz
that the non-jewish spouse does not show
up for a jewish religious event
nobody was offended nobody was hurt
nobody was miffed
it was understood that you know yeah i'm
married to a non-jewish woman but you
know it's a religious event a jewish
religious event so you know
she's not today if there would be any
type of request made of that nature
there would be tremendous offense
because
it's not enough today to be tolerant you
have to accept you have to validate
you and and that's really the problem of
changing the standard and that's really
what pope is saying
that even if a person is a hypocrite is
it they're at least acknowledging a
standard
now let me bring you a very interesting
proof that hypocrisy on some level
is a virtue a virtue in the limited
sense i'm referring to that at least
you're acknowledging
you're giving lip service to a standard
of behavior
and it's from the daughters of moab uh
the terror says
in par in in safer dvaram but it's based
on these events
that a moabite who converts to judaism
is not allowed to marry into the jewish
people god basically said
the moabites are not welcomed into khloe
israel
and the reason is because when we are
trying to go through their land on the
way to israel and we ask them for food
and water
and we're willing to pay them for food
and water
they are cruel they lack compassion they
don't have a heart
and because of that cruelty
they are not worthy of entering on
israel this is what the torah says
and yet we know that this halacha only
applies to
male moabite converts
it does not apply to female moabite
convert and the proof of course is
the story of ruse russ was a female
moabite convert she is the
great great grandmother of dubbin
hamillah
so the question is if the men are
excluded why aren't the women excluded
so the gemara gives the following reason
the men are excluded because they should
have given the jewish people food and
water
as a matter of elemental kindness but we
can't condemn the women
because it wouldn't have been modest
for the women to bring out food and
water
to a foreign army so we can't blame the
women
they were acting because of cenias
now think about this is it true that the
moabite women
didn't give us food and water because of
modesty considerations
when we read in this parsha how they
entice the jewish people
to promiscuity and fornication and
idolatry
but when it comes to giving water sorry
you know we don't talk to strange men
so obviously the moabite women had
nothing
their concern had nothing to do with
sneeze
but what's the point but their action
was a tsunua action meaning it wasn't it
wouldn't be proper for women to go out
to a foreign army
so they did the right thing even for the
wrong reason
and they still get rewarded for it right
you kind of see the idea that
yeah of course their motives were not
because of modesty but they did a modest
thing
so we'll give them some reward for it so
the idea that people often say you know
i don't want to put on to fill in
because i'm a hypocrite or i don't want
to you know keep
kosher in a restaurant because i'm a
hypocrite you know
it's okay to be a hypocrite a little bit
because you're trying to do
you know just be again the philosophy is
just because you're not doing the whole
thing
doesn't mean you can't do a little bit
of the thing mitzvos
everyone matters so to say i'm not going
to do mitzvoth
until i'm doing them 100 that's
voltaire's famous statement
that you can't allow the best to be the
enemy of the better
the person said i can't do the best
in fact uh um the founder of orthomark
was
not not alive i remember weinbach's
used to have a saying and it's a very
it's a very nice thing
you know everyone knows the saying
anything worth doing is worth doing good
everyone knows that he changed it a
little bit
anything worth doing is worth doing bad
and if you think about that the concept
basically says
even if i'm not going to be perfect it's
worthwhile doing it anyway
meaning better to do something bad or
incomplete let's say
than not to do it so on one hand
hypocrisy has its place do what you can
but there's one area where you can't be
a hypocrite
you've got to be totally devoted and
that's to be zealous for the glory of
god
if you're not doing it for god if you're
doing it out of anger if you're doing it
out of power
if you're doing it out of ego if you're
doing it out of self-advertisement
you're not going to get credit
for doing the meritorious action
in the case of pinchas you'll be a
murderer
kannauts kanoat means zealousness
for the sake of god has to be for the
sake of god
and i include in this all the different
modern forms barak hashem
zealousness today does not take the form
of murder
for the most part although we've had
some instances but british em
most of the time that's not gonna happen
but whether it's throwing rocks
whether it's lying in front of cars
whether it's blocking traffic
whether it's calling names if you're
doing it to disparage
if you're doing it to denigrate if
you're doing it to humiliate
if you're doing it just to give yourself
a sense that i'm better than
them whoever the them is then your
zealousness becomes illegitimate
and becomes sinful because it is not
being done for the glory of god
salvatrik used to point out that the
relationship between a legitimate zealot
and an illegitimate zealot is similar
to the relationship of a housewife who
buys a cat
to get rid of the mice that are in the
house let's say
now the housewife and the cat
have a common agenda if there are mice
now we want the cat to get it but the
difference between the i said household
i think it doesn't have to be the right
maybe the husband whoever is buying the
cat but the difference between the one
who buys the cat and the cat
is the person who buys the cat would be
a lot happier if there wouldn't be any
mice
the cat will be sorely disappointed
he says a legitimate zealot for the
glory of god
does not get joy in exposing the
shortcomings of other people
there's not like a gotcha moment i'm
exposing you i'm showing you
who you really are showing the world who
you really are
a person who acts for the glory of god
feels pain
that shabbos is desecrated feels
pain that there's immorality feels pain
that's whatever the issue is that people
are not honest in business although as
far as they know there are no
demonstrations for that although
there could be and there should be and
in fact they feel pain not only because
of god's name that's being desecrated
but they feel pain for the jews that are
being led astray
in other words the ideal feeling of the
kanawhi
when he sees a jew that's desecrating
shabbos
is not anger and hate and
self-righteousness
but it's pain and even love for a jew
that does not have
that is not connected to that heritage
and therefore i would be much happier
if there wouldn't be this thing i got to
expose
but the illegitimate kanoi
gets a great deal of joy
in uncovering the soft
underbelly of whatever it is they can
uncover this kind of a sense of
triumphalism a sense of
see how good we are sometimes you see
this i mean again you often see this in
eric israel when
when god forbids tragedies happen like
marone or whatever it is
so sometimes sometimes people jump to
ascribe the tragedy to some sin
that somebody's doing but it's always a
sin of somebody else
it says you see this happened because of
you again whoever the you is everyone
everyone's pointing a finger
in a different direction as opposed to
what did it what is it that i could do
to rectify the situation
now i remember many many years ago
before i was even a congregational rabbi
so i used to listen
to sermons more than i have to give them
so one shabbos shiva in baltimore
i went to two synagogues one was a very
what you call the charade yeshivasa
synagogue black hat kolo people
and the rav gave adrasha about the
importance of keeping shabbos
meticulously
in accordance with all of the halachos
and everybody loved that russia because
everybody in the show
was keeping shabbos so they're nodding
and saying yeah yeah
then i went to another show which was a
more modern orthodox orientation
and the rabbi spoke about the importance
of greeting people
welcoming people you know loving your
neighbor as you love yourself
and again people were nodding now um
maybe i have a cynical temperament a
little bit so maybe it's not so good but
i was thinking to myself you know the
the yeshiva shakha baby show
everybody they're already kept shabbos
but sometimes it was a little cold and
unwelcoming and the more modern orthodox
show
everybody was very nice and warm and
fuzzy but maybe they weren't always as
meticulous
in keeping shabbos and the ritual laws
so i thought to myself it would have
been a wonderful
thing if the dress shouts were switched
uh because you see what happens is when
when you're hearing a dress shirt that's
simply appealing it would call preaching
to the choir
so what does everybody think they're
thinking so the rabbi is talking about
keeping shoppers saying
yeah yeah that's why that show over
there you know
isn't doing its job and then when the
other rabbi is talking about the need to
be warm and friendly
yeah that yeshiva shield over there
isn't doing its job
because each one is using it to kind of
cast aspersions
on the other one instead of recognizing
our own our own our own our own work and
the light
so kanot has to be the shame shamayim
and not only the shame shamayim but i'm
adding another point
it has to be out of love and not out of
hate
it has to be out of a genuine care for
am israel and this explains
a famous beautiful beautiful vort
from ref cook that rav celibacy used to
i used to quote very very often of yosef
salvatrik of
yeshiva university shmona israel is
called the 18
blessings but actually it's actually 19
blessings during the week the weekday
amida
is 19 blessings and the gemara explains
originally it was 18
but in the time of rabban gamlio after
the destruction of the temple
rama gamlio wanted to make a special
blessing against the heretics and the
missionaries
it's not entirely clear who was the
people he was trying to make a bracha
against but many say it referred to the
early christian movements many of whom
most of whom were jews that were
infiltrating the bait knesset
and trying to bring jews away from the
torah
towards the belief in jesus and the like
these are called meenan mean em are
sectarians
and rabbit um leo says who can compose a
blessing against the sectarians
if he was really at a quandary who can
write such a blessing
until they finally identified a man
who is known as shemoil hakatan
that means shmuel the humble and he is
the one who authored
the bracha against sectarians
this is the 19th blessing of shmona
esray and this is
the blessing against informers against
missionaries against all of those things
this is the gemaran brachus this is the
gemara
so rav cook has the kasha what's
reverend kamil's
big question who can write a bracha
against the heretics and the
missionaries the same people who wrote
the other 18 could write this one what
is so unique about this blessing that we
have to find a special author
and what is so unique about shamu
al-khattan
that he is that special author
so cesaro cooked the following vlamal
shinim is very unique
it's very different than the rest of
shmona's rain
in all of shimon ashrae we are asking
god for blessings
give us forgiveness give us redemption
give us health give us parnassa we're
asking we know we're praising god of
course and we thank god but in the
middle
we're asking god for things there is no
barakah that talks about hurting other
people
the only brother that asks god to
destroy
the or at least the main content is
destruction
is almost so here is robin gamliel's
quandary
when you're asking god to destroy your
enemies
you can't be coming out of hate out of
anger
out of a desire to hurt that's treif
that's puzzle
that is not a legitimate kavanagh to
come
to god rather your motivation has to be
out of
love for um israel if i ask god to
destroy enemies
it's not because i want the enemies to
suffer
it's because i want the jewish people to
be saved
and to be rescued so rather galil says
who could possibly compose a blessing
with the requisite qabana that way
because the romans and the missionaries
and the informers have
it's like saying you know who could
compose a blessing that god should
defeat hitler
without feeling a personal animosity and
hatred towards hitler it's impossible
surah gamil says
we have so much hurt and so much
pain from these enemies then by
definition the bracha would incorporate
the anger and the hate
but that's not legitimate to turn to god
so who could do it
can do it why is that so we know very
little about shemola qatar and we know
he was an extremely righteous person
in fact the gemara gives us a story that
once the sages were sitting in a chamber
and a voice came out of heaven and said
there is a person in this room who is as
worthy of the shakina resting on him as
mosha rabeno
but the generation is undeserving and
everybody in the room looked at shmoel
hakutan very great very saintly
but there's very little that that that
of his sayings that are preserved
in fact there's only one saying of his
that is preserved
in pirkei of us and it's not even his
saying
it's apothecan proverbs
used to say the phrase means he said it
constantly this was his motto
this was his mission statement and it's
not even his own words it's the words of
mishlai
bina fal or yivaca
when your enemy experiences downfall
do not rejoice
in other words don't rejoice in the
sufferings of others
says that's the guy who can write
vlamal
because he's not acting out of a desire
that people should be hurt or humiliated
or destroyed
he's acting out of a love for amy israel
and that's pinhus in fact
many of you might have heard of the uh
now he's retired but uh
the very colorful and controversial
rabbi avi weiss
and happy west is a controversial guy
and i have to say at the outset
because i'm sure i'm going to get
now that these things are broadcast i
get all sorts of uh
critiques from all over the place so i
got to be careful
i certainly do not endorse everything
avi weiss does but as a person i i do
like him
and i admire him and avi weiss made his
reputation
all the way back he was involved in the
struggle
to liberate soviet jewry when there was
a soviet union
he often got arrested etc he was a big
activist he was always getting in the
newspapers
on television he once said a remark that
i found
very very interesting he said
if you want to be a true activist
you have to hate what you're doing you
can't love what you're doing
because if you love getting your name in
the paper if you love being on
television
then it's no longer about the cause
it's about you a real activist
doesn't want the publicity he doesn't
want the glory he doesn't want the honor
but he says nebucha i gotta do this for
the greater good
and that's what pinchas says pinchas
didn't act
because he wanted to hurt with sha'im
he acted because he loved ami israel and
he saw them being destroyed
and the kasab sofia who is the son of
the hassam salfir
says this in a very beautiful way when
the torah describes pinchas
it says pinchas the son of al-azhar
the son of aram so most understand that
to mean
pinchas was the son of elazar and their
lazar is the son of iran
and that's the that's the genealogy and
then the
professor have a problem why are you
connecting him to his grandfather
normally when the torah
identifies a person it just says name
son of father it doesn't connect him to
the grandfather so the commentaries
go into different reasons why you
mention the grandfather
but you know what the kisab sopha says
the kasab sofa says
this is homolytical granted that you can
translate the passage in a different way
instead of saying pinchas is the son of
elazar
and al-azhar is the son of aram you can
translate the passage that pinchas has
two fathers
pinchas is biologically the son of
al-azhar
and pinchas spiritually
is the son of aaron pinchas
what is the point of connecting him to
our own because our own's outstanding
midah
is of course oh hey shalom varudev
shalom
a lover of peace a pursuer of peace
and the torah is telling me pinchas
was a man of peace not a man of war
pinchas did what he did not because it
was his nature
pinchas did what he did even though it
wasn't his nature
but it had to be done for the greater
good
penthouse was following exactly what abi
wise says
pinchas hated what he did but he had to
do it
out of the love that he had from himself
and this goes back to my original
question
and that is why god gave him the bracha
of peace because pinchas may have done a
violent act
but this was a violent act to excise a
cancer
that would have been destroying amy
israel and he acted
not out of hate and not out of
triumphalism
but he acted out of love for
israel and therefore hashem said you
will have the capacity to bring peace
between the jewish people and god and
between jews like ira
to be a lover of peace and a and a
a pursuer a pursuer of peace right so
this is kind of the
general understanding of kannauts of the
notion of
being zealous you know it's not a game i
have to say that it often
hurts me very much when i see
the various zealousness that goes on
whether it's throwing stones or blocking
a road or whatever it is
and often it's you know a young you know
not yet not very young but often
adolescents who are in yeshiva
and it kind of becomes like a game
they're laughing
you know it's kind of a nice you know a
nice game that we can block traffic on
yafa road and the like
and you know when you're turning into a
game even though people are being
inconvenienced and people
can't get to medical appointments
sometimes and the like
then you're not doing it out of a sense
of grief and pain
and the desire to bring jews together
and you become like the cat
that gets a perverse joy in finding the
mice
and that is the kanos that reframe
solavei who himself was a great kanoi
in fact that's a whole interesting story
yeah you know there's always the rav of
brisk
was the ancestor of of all the briskers
and uh they are very very zealous and
refrain was very zealous i have to be
honest rafael was
well this is a whole interesting story
maybe we'll we'll devote a shirt to it
one time
ruffham salvajic before he was the rev
of brisk
was the junior rosh yeshiva in the
world's famous velocinator yeshiva
and those were the happiest years of his
life with hayem was a wonderful rav
but his nishamah was that of a rosh
yeshiva rafael
those 12 years in belgium were the
greatest happiest years
of rafael's life and rafael was the
junior rosh yeshiva
uh the senior rosh shiva was the
grandfather of
hayem's wife and that's the nisiv of
naphtali tv
to berlin to berlin was russia
for 50 years and the last 12 years
he was joined with with hayan salvajic
they had a very different i mean they
were they were very different in so many
different ways
the natives approach to learning was
very
encyclopedic that it was a master of
every obscure reference
in the babylonian talmud the jerusalem
talmud the tysepta
the zoa or the madrish like and instead
of like knew everything
and would bring everything in so when
the nasiv would analyze a sugya
he would always bring every type of
obscure
little-known reference to bear rafchayam
on the other hand
was not into bringing so many references
ravqueyam was known for his depth
his acuity is going very very deep
and that's why in velojin there were
some students who gravitated to the
nasiv
and some students who gravitated to
refrain
most of the great rosh hashibas of the
next generation
were followers of rafael the analytical
in depth
ralph cook actually was very very close
to the mitsif
but the reason i'm bringing the sins a
little bit of a digression
is that there was another big difference
in my rifle
and then itsev and that is their
attitude to the zionist movement
as it was emerging uh and that is
the native was a kind of a supporter of
zionism now again he was very very
saddened
that so many zionists were secular and
they were not keeping the torah
but he saw zionism overall as a positive
force in on israel and he felt that if
more religious people would be involved
in the zionist movement they could make
it a more torah-based
uh ideology so he was a sport and he saw
that even in the secular zionist
he saw some positive developments this
of course was exactly the attitude that
ruff cook absorbed so
we sometimes think we've cooked like
invented all of these things
ref cook of course put his own stamp
on things he had an amazing creative
individualistic stamp
but a lot of the basic foundations of
his ideology
were from the native now there's of
course a chicken and the egg problem
uh did rav cook become who he was
because of the nisiv or was he attracted
to the nasir because rafcook already had
that philosophy that you know that you
know i don't know rafchayam on the other
hand
considered zionism to be a rebellion
against god and refrain was an
absolute anti-zionist and he felt it was
sinful
to be involved and the point i'm making
is this that rafael was a very zealous
person
but rafael is the one that uses the
analogy
of the housewife and the cat that if
you're a zealous person
you have to be motivated out of love and
concern
and not a with the german word
schrodinger which is kind of a
joy in the failures exposing
the failures of others that is not a
positive attribute
so what i want to just mention a little
bit is i want to mention
that zealousness is sometimes justified
we do have to sometimes stand up against
wrong but it does have some costs and
one needs to be aware of the costs
and i i would like to identify four
negative
things that can happen to a person when
they develop
this tendency towards zealousness
as opposed to a tolerance and an
acceptance
and an openness first of all
when you constantly focus on the
negatives in other people
you develop a negative cynical attitude
that impairs your ability to respond to
ketucha
because if you look closely enough
everything can be traced you could
eventually create a world
where everybody to the right of you is a
fanatic
everybody to the left of you is an api
chorus
and you create a world that gets
increasingly narrow
narrow and narrow and your children's
rebbe is you know
not really teaching the ms and the rev
of your show isn't good and this scuttle
isn't good and this cuddle isn't good
and everybody keeps on getting excluded
and excluded and excluded
and excluded and at some point
you lose the capacity
to be inspired by holiness
because your eye has been trained
to see the negatives and see the notes
in everything that everybody does
and when you lose the ability to see the
good
in what people are doing and you focus
so much on the negative
that destroys your ability to appreciate
i remember reading this is maybe uh an
analogy out of the total left field mark
twain
in one of his book oh yes in life on the
mississippi you know mark twain his name
was samuel clemens and mark twain was
his pen name because that was something
if you were a riverboat pilot
on the mississippi river mark twain is
mark twain means two and you when you
had to
demarcate a certain area of the river
mark twain is what you would call
i have an affinity to mark twain because
mark twain spent his adult years
in hartford connecticut so the mark
twain house
for those of you who are ever planning
and traveling to west hartford
connecticut
is in west hartford and this was a
common school trip
when i was in elementary school
so mark twain writes in life on the
mississippi
he said he loved being a riverboat pilot
but he said he lost something very
precious
listen and again he says it much better
than i can say it he said
you know you look at a river and you see
a beautiful body of water that shimmers
and glimmers
and you know as the sun hits the water
at different places and the trees
create shade you see beauty and you see
grace but when you're a riverboat pilot
you realize all you're looking at is
the reason there's a shadow here is
because there's rocks
and there are fallen trees and there are
roots and you're so
focused on the negatives
and the dangers that you literally lose
the capacity
to see the beauty and he gave an analogy
of an orthopedic surgeon watching a
ballet
forgive me maybe it's not the most
similar example he says
a person could look at a dancer and you
i mean okay man
and you see movement and you see grace
and you see
fluidity now you're an orthopedic
surgeon saying
oh i see that ligament stretching and i
see that muscle tearing and i see that
he says and at some point you're only
seeing the negatives
and you don't see the beauty you know i
remember
a very dear friend of mine who was nifty
recently uh rabbi
yitzhak some of you might know him
he was the director of ncsy
in the atlantic seaboard in the
baltimore area
for many many years and he inspired
really generations he was a kasira
shiyid
and he was working with public school
kids but he inspired them tremendously
and i i in the 80s i used to work with
him
so i remember that what ncsy does they
still do it is
when they have shabbatons for public
school kids so mozai shabbas they have a
kumsits you know that they they close
and they shut the lights and
and the kids get up and they tell their
stories it's like true confession time
very very
emotional stories so i remember
a girl got up she was like 14 years old
and she was saying that not only are her
parents not religious
but they are absolutely opposed to her
keeping shabbos
so when she's at home what she has to do
is 11 o'clock at night
after her parents are asleep she goes
into the bathroom
she lights shabbos candles she recites
abraca
well then she blows out the candles
and turns on the fan so there won't be
any
any smell and then she goes to sleep now
you could actually give a smith
how many prohibitions did this girl
commit like how many melakos
did she do you know it would be a very
interesting you know you can come up
with 20 20 things you did wrong
plus a brocco in the bathroom you know a
million things
so i could look at this and i could say
uh
violated shabbos said blessings in vain
sin after sin after sin
that's true but on the other hand
look at how much she cared
look at how much she tried you know
she's a girl who doesn't have her own
place she's
totally under the control of her parents
and they're not letting her serve hashem
but she still so much wants to do so
i can't speak for god i don't have that
authority
but i can't help but think
that in hashem's book that counts not
just for something it counts for a lot
in spite of all the mistakes that she
made because she didn't know and i
my guess is i don't know i haven't been
following her my guess is that you know
maybe she's living in yerushalayim you
know a totally religious life
precisely because of her self-sacrifice
in those early years so cost number one
is that when you become negative cynical
and judgmental
it robs your ability to be inspired
by spiritual beauty and in fact here is
something that's scary
this even happened to pinchas himself
pinterest himself was victimized by his
very legitimate and pure zealousness
absolutely pure zealousness and that is
based on the rabbinic tradition
that pinchas never died pinchas morphed
and eventually became elio hanabi who
never died
and if you read the book of kings
you actually find that although yo navi
had the singular distinction
of going up to heaven alive great great
merit unparalleled merit
but essentially he did so because he was
fired if you remember
uh he did a great miracle at mount
carmel
where altars were built and fire came
down from heaven
and everybody said hashem okay hashem is
the god what we say after yom kippur
and he brought ami israel to chuva
and the next day ahav tells him the evil
king tells him that was a great show you
did yesterday
but don't think anything's changed i'm
still going to kill you
and the jews reverted back to idolatry
and at that point elio navi is broken
and he says to god get rid of these
people
forget about these people they annulled
your covenant
by the way the gemara says that's why
leonavi has to go to every bris because
he declared
they don't keep your breasts hashem says
oh yeah
you've got to go to everyone they do
keep the bris
right by and large brah hashem and
elianovi wanders in the desert and he
comes to haarseni
and there's a famous scene one of the
most famous scenes in tanakh
where there is an earthquake and god is
not in the earthquake
and there's a fire and god is not in the
fire and there's a hurricane and god is
not in the hurricane
but god is in a small quiet voice
and essentially he tells elio and navi
anoint your successor
you've lost faith in your people you
cannot lead them again in fact
indeed in some ways that was the sin of
moshe rabeno himself and there are many
interpretations
hitting the rock etc but ultimately it
came out the fact that he lost faith in
israel so essentially
the kannauts eventually turned into
losing faith in the people and the
leonabi was replaced
he was honored of course the tremendous
honor of his righteousness
but he was replaced so that's one idea
the second idea is that
when you're too focused on identifying
the flaws of other people
that gives us too much of an excuse
not to look at ourselves because i'm
always looking at
yeah he didn't right now you might like
my example with the two dresses of the
shows
right yeah in a way you know i always
feel a little guilty because i i might
be
you know guilty of the same thing i'm
talking about against if i'm giving you
a speech
about not looking at the flaws of others
so what gives me the right to talk about
the flaws of others
that's a good question that is a good
question and it's a question that
bothers me
all i can say is that what i hope to be
doing for myself
is to turn it inward and apply it to
myself i i don't mean to
look down at others i don't mean to be
critical of others i mean to simply
identify
processes that i think all of us are
prone to
and we need maybe to be a little more
conscious of it
in the sense of not paying such close
attention
to the flaws of others because that's
often a very convenient excuse
not to engage in our own introspection
and our own
and there's a third lesson that's very
relevant here
and that is you know the old english
saying
uh what i always he said what goes
around comes around or is it what comes
around goes around
which way you say it but there is a
concept
again uh a buddhist will talk about
karma i'm not going to use i'm not going
to use karma but
there is a concept that the pain that we
cause in the world
even if it's justifiable comes back to
bite us that if we do things
that cause pain embarrassment
humiliation
to others we will suffer from it even
though it's justifiable let me give you
the example you'll see from the example
what i mean
when haman and megillah tester
decrees that the jewish people
will be wiped out and mordechai gets the
news
of haman's decree so the passage tells
us
he cried mordechai cried aloud
and bitter cry
now point out that that
phrase a loud and bitter cry
only appears one other time in tanakh
and that is when asav discovers
that yaakov took the brachos that were
intended for him
and yakov took the brachus and asaf
comes back with the meats for yitzhak
and yitzhak says sorry i gave the
brachus away already however you
understand that
the gemara megillah says because
yaakov caused asaph
to cry a loud and bitter cry
the descendant of asaf that's harman
because i'm alike is a descendant of
descendant of and haman of course is a
descendant of amalek
causes the descendant of yaakov
mordechai
to have that bitterness in that crime
now this is not because of a punishment
because
the assumption is however we understand
that parsha that'll be a talk for
another time
if we assume that yaakov was justified
in what he did
yaakov did what he had to do if he did
what he had to do why is he suffering
negative consequences
for levitz explains that
the notion that when you cause pain
you will get pain is not because of
reward and punishment
it's a law of nature it's a law of
spiritual nature the example would be
let's say the following
let's imagine god forbid there's a fire
and a baby is trapped in the fire
and you dive in the fire and you rescue
the baby
did you do a good thing yes did you do a
mitzvah yes
does that mean you're not going to be
burnt no
because getting burnt when you dive into
a fire is not a question
of being punished it's just the natural
consequence
sometimes god may do a supernatural
miracle but usually not
usually god does not usually the way god
runs the world
he usually does not do a supernatural
miracle
which means if you dive into the fire
you're going to be burnt
whether you're diving in was justified
or not justified because it's a
consequence for if haims beloved says
causing pain to another human being
has a cosmic consequence that they'll
come back to bite you now
that doesn't mean you avoid it meaning
sometimes it's necessary for me to do
and i will do it
but i need to know that there's going to
be a cost
it's not a freebie and if it's not a
freebie
i better be very very certain that this
is the right thing to do again
the the the response is not to say never
intervene
but to be aware there's a consequence to
your intervention
it's not just a game that you play
and this is something to realize that
canal woods
can often mean that the pain and the
embarrassment the shame and the hurt
that we inflict on others can come back
to haunt us
in various ways
i mentioned that was a very very
tolerant person i mean both refrain and
initiative were tremendous control and
by the way
i don't want god forbid say anything
negative about refuge if i am on a
personal level
was the paragon absolute paragon of
kindness
and tolerance and love it's recorded rev
the native's youngest son was of mayor
berlin
who changed his name hebrew sized his
name to mayor
bar elan right the famous barilon street
named after
rav mayor barilan it's interesting that
native had two sons
the older son who was kai in berlin who
was
kharedi kharedi kharedi and the younger
son was
mayor barilan who was religious zionist
religious i and this religious zionist
they were from different wives maybe
that may have something to do with it
as it were but mayor bariland was from
the native second
second wife but romero barilan wrote a
book of
fascinating memoirs because he knew
rafhaim salavaitrik
as a young boy right and and even though
his path was totally remember i
mentioned if heim considered zionism
to be opie corsus and kefira and heresy
but dr of mayor so everything rev mayor
bariland stood for rafael rejected
but you can see to me it's so
fascinating you can see the tremendous
affection
that existed between repair manager of
mayor berryland
how they loved each other so i don't i
don't want anyone
i mean even though i'm digressing i
don't want anyone to walk away with the
idea that rafael was
was a meanie he absolutely was not but
he had very strong ideas but the nitsir
as they say was was very open and very
tolerant and in the
math to his great commentary
hamikdabar he actually explains you know
everyone knows the famous gemara that
says
that the first pesa mikdash was
destroyed
because of the sins of avodahzara
idolatry gileario sexual immorality
and murder that's the first temple
and the second temple was destroyed
because of
irrational groundless hatred and
polarization among the jews
and the german goes on and says ah the
first temple that was destroyed for the
worst of eiros the gallaudet was only 70
years
the second temple that was destroyed
because of sinatra
nam we're still in the galut and we can
add a thousand years to the gemara state
more than that
etc so then it's this is the gemara this
is not the native
but then the tip says what was the
manifestation
of the s
and then it says because there were many
different religious groupings
and each religious grouping looked at
the other religious grouping
and said you're a heretic you're an api
chorus
and they were not willing to see the
good or the legitimacy
within the movements now i want to point
out the netsif
himself was severely criticized for
making that statement because
obviously the sid was applying it to
contemporary
situation in the 19th century so in a
sense
he got criticized for his criticism of
people who are critical it kind of goes
in a
circle it reminds me of when i think
the last pope pope benedict made a
statement
that too much of islam was violent and
he was met with
violent protests disagreeing with his
assessments
you know i've kind of kind of proved the
part in a way
uh so i don't mean to compare the two
the opposition to the native kind of
proves
exactly what the anitsiv was saying but
he says
that that was the sinatra nam of the
bayat cheney now
i just have to end that this is a
difficult difficult dilemma that one
faces in life because on one hand
we talk about the goodness of tolerance
and acceptance and openness
and seeing the good and striving to
look at other people in a favorable way
on the other hand there is a concept of
truth
and there is a concept of principle and
there is a concept of
not diluting the integrity
of one's core beliefs and the question
indeed becomes
how do you have one without the other
well one without the other guy but how
do you have both that's the problem
how do you become a man of intel person
of integrity
and at the same time to be open
receptive
positive to others right you can be one
or the other you can be a man of
integrity
and be a zealot that is always
protesting and lambasting
or you can be and i'm okay you're okay
everything goes
that's not good either gotta try to be
both at the same time
that's really quite a quite a very very
great challenge
but i think in many ways the great key
to this
is a pasuk and michele that again i have
used many many times so you've heard it
many times
command upon him upon him as water
reflects
the face that you show the water so
too the heart of man reflects that which
is shown to it and the biligon explains
when i look at water reflecting water
so the face that i show the water is the
face i will see in the water
i smile at the water i will get a
smiling face
i frown at the water i get a frowning
face
so the passage says the same way water
will reflect back
whatever you show the water the heart of
one human being
will reflect back that which i show that
human being
i show that human being love and
acceptance
and respect they will be open
to love and respect what i stand for
i show them denigration that they're
worthless that they're nothing that
they're
happy chorus they will look at me
and not see value in what i stand for
so in many many ways the best way to
promulgate
the ideas that you think are
authentically torah
that's always a question is to kind of
be open to see the good in others
because then you have and
melakh's promise
kamayam happaniya melt on him so we are
in the three
weeks it is our job in these three weeks
to try to rebuild the base of mikhtash
and one of the
most important ways we would build the
base of mechdash is not by bulldozing
the temple mount and getting rid of the
mosque although some people
do say that but we by and large told
that that's mashiach's job
but we have to do the internal work and
the internal work
is to rectify the sins and the
gamim the defects that caused the
kharban
sinatrinam is the greatest of them
may hashem give us the ability to do
that
may we be zoha to the binyan betamiktas
bim thank you
[Music]