Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
[Music]
thank you for coming
and uh this year tonight is dedicated
lia liat nishamat of rabbi bruce
raikkonen who is harav kodesh benjayim
contributed by michael and hannah
pietrokowski and again we hope the chair
should be eloy nishmatau
and
in addition a refuse leima
to bryan batrava
in honor of the 84th birthday of raqqa
leia batsville freyan fishel lorraine
black and
roccaleo should live a long and healthy
life in addition we have an anonymous
contributor
and he sent a little ins he or she sent
a little inscription it is taught that
the students of rabbi akiva
perished during the omer because they
did not allow show enough respect for
one another i would like to anonymously
show a small token of respect to ray
braitos and rabbi poston for all the
great work they do at the banan bina
thank you very much and again uh
may any may you and all who contribute
to the support of torah be given the
blessings that the kurdish broker for
those who do support
the torah of hashem
so we are approaching
once it's passed lag by omer we're
already in the second stretch of sphira
and in addition
this coming sunday is the 28th of er
and in case you don't know that's a very
very significant day in the modern
jewish calendar that is yom yusuf that
is the day in the six day war
that we finally regained after 19 years
of being separated
we regained the old city and even most
important in that the hierarchy
and those of you who are a little older
may remember the famous words of matagor
who was the officer who first got there
habayitz biodeno the temple mount is in
our hands
and there was such a tremendous
tremendous outpouring of joy that
yerushalayim was not once again eer
shachubra lawyer a city that was united
every part of yerushalayim was under the
control of the jewish people whether
we've moved backwards on that issue is
an interesting political point which i'm
not going to discuss
in particular but anyone that knows
remembers that the six day war the
aftermath of the six day war because it
really was so miraculous so amazing so
beyond the derek
was actually a major impetus
in the chuva movement in bringing many
many jews back to yiddish gay both asha
torah and your samara were essentially
founded in the aftermath of the six day
war but there were unfortunately two
different reactions one reaction was
this could only come from god
and that brought people closer and
closer to torah and yiddish which was a
wonderful thing
but there also had been an opposite
attitude wow we are really wonderful we
can defeat all of these arab nations you
know in a few days
and that exemplified the guyva the
arrogance of the attitude of kohi
viotsem yadi when a person says my
success comes from my strength and my
might so you had two opposite reactions
to the sixth day war you had this idea
that this could only come from god
and then you had an attitude we are like
superman we are the greatest military in
the world
which you know again i'm willing to say
is largely true but we still need hashem
to get us through this
so many say that the um kippur war of
1973 only uh five or six years after the
sixth day war was unfortunately the very
very sad corrective
to the attitude of kokhi of yosemite
which was really a devastating more or
less i mean
israel pulled through but it was a very
demoralizing defeat
which showed us how vulnerable we are
and as sad as that was as tragic as that
was
uh it was seen by some as
kind of a a spiritual corrective
to sober us up
to sober us up and make make us
recognize that
uh without god uh we're powerless with
god we can do any everything
and that's where we're holding now and
uh over the years we still remember the
glorious day when we were able after 19
years to go to the temple mount
to go to the uh or at least the wall
surrounding the temple mount some went
down the temple mount so i'm going to
temple mount to pray to our kurdish
kodesh
and that's yom yerushalayim which is the
28th of er that is the hebrew day
one little comment about the name of our
beloved city
the name of the city that is imprinted
on the consciousness
of every jew
yerushalayim yushalayim is actually a
merger of two different city areas just
like minneapolis st paul
and the like and that is the original
name of the city which is already in
biblical times was shalem
salem
we see
after avraham's victory
against the four powerful kings
the righteous king melech shalem the
king of shalem brought the abram
and yayan bread and wine for who kohan
lakelo yong this is way before military
was given
was a cohen
to the almighty gods
and basically even in ancient times
before the torah was given before there
was a jewish people
shalem was known as a holy place
a sacred place and the kings of shalem
were given the hereditary title
the king of righteousness just like
pirate was the hereditary title of the
kings of egypt in fact qazal tell us
that malchistic is none other than shame
the son of noah
but when he's king of shalem he is
called
zedek so the original name of the city
was said
i'm sorry shalem shalem
so where do we get the uru
because that's the other part of the
city mount moriah
when avraham avinu was willing
was willing to sacrifice his son yitzhak
he renamed haramaria the temple mount he
called it
hashem yerev
god will look down and see his people
god will remember the merit of the
al-qaeda he will look at his people with
compassion and love year
hashem
so consequently the temple mount was
called
year the rest of the city was called
shalem
so put the two words together you get
year ah shalem
well that's close but no cigars they say
ye is not uru
but the meforshim say
aleph and hey is close enough but aleph
and hay is gemachuri above so you can
merge the two letters to make yeru
but we're still not there yet
because that should mean that the name
should be pronounced
yerushalem just like which is mamish
jerusalem
where do you get the yud the second
yerushalayim
now in fact
in tanakh
yerushalayim is normally written
although we pronounce it jerusalem it is
commonly written without that second yet
so phonetically it actually spells
yerushalem
but where do you get the double so here
two of them before some say a beautiful
idea
the yud mem the yim sound is a plural
like yadda yim
raghlayim oznayim
yerushalayim means two
yerushalems
what what do we mean by two yerushalams
we don't mean east jerusalem
and west jerusalem but we mean there's a
heavenly jerusalem
and there's an earthly jerusalem
and when there is goula when there's a
bait makdash
the heavenly is in perfect alignment
with the earthly jerusalem
so yerushalam quite literally means you
shall rather quite literally means
two
yerushalems
and yushalem in turn is a combination of
the two cities so to speak two areas one
is shalem and the other is ye hashem
yirae which is what abraham avinu called
the temple mount together they become
you shall mind
these two names yera and shalem
are actually quite interesting
because they actually highlight
some contradictory aspects
of these cities
similar to what we talked about spherus
omer last week so this is going to
overlap a little bit and that is era
itself
is a bit of a double meaning
yera as avram avinu used it meant god
will see ye
god will see
but it has the same letters as the word
year o which is fear and reverence
and the medrush indeed does interpret ye
as not only referring to the verb of ye
god will see
but also a noun meaning fear and
reverence for god
shalem
is shalom peace
and you shall i am therefore is
described
as the city of divine reverence
the city of peace
and without
repeating everything we talked about
last week i i noted last week
that these two goals
are often in opposition to each other
because as we grow in our yirat hashem
we often fail to accept the ideas of
others
we fail to respect to be tolerant
to see the legitimacy of different types
of approaches
sometimes yeah
overpowers shalom
and sometimes shalom
overpowers iran which you compromise
on basic fundamental ideas
the combination of iran shalom
once again highlights the idea
that as we grow in yirat hashem
we must also grow in shalom
as we grow in shalom we cannot let it be
at the expense of era
we can't allow our religious enthusiasm
to denigrate others to look down at
others
to take away the sense of respect that
we can have for people
but at the same time we can't allow our
desire for shalom
to dilute our commitments and
kind of distort the truth
by which we live our lives
and
that kind of paradox a little bit
is the essence of what it means to live
in yerushalayim you know it's brought
down
that there are four although all of eric
israel is kadosh that's of course the
case but there are four special holy
cities
and the holy cities are yerushalayim
tavaria
you can either consider me the four holy
cities they correspond to the four
primeval elements
that uh
yerushalayim is the city of fire
and svath is the city of air ethereal
mystical kabbalistic lebron the place of
the graves of the arvos is the city of
dirt
tivaria is the city of water
each of the cities is
negative one of the elements
each of the cities is
one of the four letters of god's shame
havaya this had grammatical
the uk the ravque et cetera
but we see that in this typology
yerushalayim is described as the city of
fire
now fire
has a positive and a negative
fire gives light
fire gives warmth
fire enables you to do all sorts of
constructive things without fire we
would not be able to build civilization
that is why we celebrate the fact that
hashem gave adam harishan the gift of
fire mozai shabbat said it right after
shabbos and to this day we make a
barakah over the fire giving thanks that
hashem gave us something that enables
the creation of civilization
but we also know
fire can be destructive
fire can consume
yerushalayim is the city of fire
in yerushalayim there is light and there
is fire heat
there is comfort there is building there
is creativity
but at the same time
it can very easily turn into mach locus
hateful demonstrations
sometimes
hashem not that often but sometimes even
violence on the part of religious jews
there was a recent
kind of violence with the with garrett
hasidim which you're going through a
difficult difficult time right now
so
has to be balanced with shalom it is
shalom
that will be the corrective
to the excesses of age right so when we
as we approach you shalom
we should give thought about the two
names of jerusalem
what those two names represent
and how we can incorporate in our lives
both the idea of aish and the idea of
shalom i remember
one time
i had to take a cab
uh from svats back to yerushalayim
it was a north american event we were in
spots and i we needed to be back my wife
and i needed to back the new shallam
we left that swat like six in the
morning and we got to usher in whatever
it is 8 15 or 8 30
and kind of the beginning of rush hour
or not the beginning but middle of rush
hour and the horns are blaring all over
the place
and the swat cab driver just said to me
he has been a cab driver in spot for 50
years
and he had never once had to use his
horn in the car
he said he had never heard literally in
his life so many horns going off at the
same at the same time and that's the
difference right throughout you know
we're laid back you know uh stop your
car if a cow is crossing the street you
know you gotta you know be uh don't
dress uh you shalom right we're uh we're
on edge a little bit that's fire
now fire is a wonderful wonderful
necessary thing
but it can also be abused and we have to
be very very careful to use our fire for
light for warmth for creativity for
accomplishment
and not to create much locus and
sinatrina so that's just a little
thought
for yom yerushalayim
by the way yamiche lime is considered by
some to be such a significant day that
for example rabbi hershel shakhtar i had
mentioned he actually has a sock that
not to say halal on yo matsumoto for you
know various reasons but he does say
hallelujah
in recent years i guess people forget uh
yemi schleim's build has been a little
bit underplayed
people don't celebrate it with the same
enthusiasm
uh that they used to but again it's
something that's certainly very very
worthy of celebration i noticed that the
react just seeing it from the train they
put this gigantic gigantic gigantic uh
they cover the whole wall of the
building with uh without having to call
it a flag or a banner or something just
i've never seen such a big banner so
maybe this year perhaps they're planning
on doing a little bit a little bit more
okay
so now we move into yet another aspect
of actus we are beginning this week
the fourth
of the mushroom we finished last week
safer vayikra
we are beginning
this week the book of numbers safer by
midbor
now it is very interesting the hebrew
name for the book is by mid boy which
means in the desert
the english name
is numbers
and indeed what's interesting is the
english name does correspond with the
rabbinical name the rabbinical name
for
midbar is
of
census of counting i don't know if the
plural of census in latin
is sensai
but pikujim is plural
numbers countings is what it really
means
why is it called countings because the
book of bamidbor is bracketed with a
census at the beginning of the book
and it's bracketed with another census
at the end of the book
and they count two different populations
in the beginning of the book
moshe albania was commanded
to count the generation that left
mithraim
from 20 up
so that is a census
of yotsei mitzrayim
towards the end of the book
in parshas pinchas which is already
after the 40 years where the generation
of the desert dies
and the only people who are entering
erect israel except for yoshua and
colleagues
are those who are under 20 at the time
of the exodus or were born
in the 40-year period this is a new
generation this is the generation of
those who will be entering the land
interestingly enough the total of both
populations are the same the number of
the
of the otse mitzrayim
and the number of boyaris is the same
but the individual tribal totals are
different
in fact it's interesting to take a chart
and look at this meaning some tribes
actually had a big population growth
in the 40 years
other tribes had a big population
decline so the totals are the same
but the subtotals are very very
different
and it's worthwhile to compare the two
lists
and determine
who kind of increased their numbers in
the 40 years and who lost their numbers
and then see if there's any particular
reason
why that would be the case
we're going to focus tonight on the
first of those two sensai the census in
parashat bamidbor
and moshe rabeno and aron together are
commanded
to count the population of the jewish
people miben esrim shana vamala from the
age of 20. and they are given this
commandment rosh chodesh
eeyore of the second year
now the years begin in nissan in the
hamish
the mishkan was dedicated in nissan so
this is
one year and one month
or one year and two weeks really after
they left mitzrayim
and uh
one month after the mishkan was
dedicated
moshe is commanded to count the people
now rashi
makes a very interesting observation
that although
this is the first explicit counting of
the yo-sai mitzrayim
there in fact was an earlier counting
in the aftermath of the golden calf
uh when
the jewish people were contributing
money or gold for the building of the
michigan
because rashi points out that
when the mishkan was being constructed
everybody was commanded to give a half
shekel
and this would be an atonement
for the sin of the golden calf
and in parashat piku day
we are given the total number of shkalim
and hashem says everybody has to give
the same the rich man does not give more
the poor person does not give less
and the people who give the half shekel
are from the age of 20 and up
so that was after yom kippur
which means there was a census after yom
kippur
through the half shekel
and then there was a census after ear
which is the beginning of safer bamidbar
why would there be a need to count
the otse mitzrayim it's the same
population base
why would there be a need to count the
old same italian
twice
within a span
of seven months
it's the same population base the people
that were 20 years old
when they left with ryan
so rashi gives the following answer
rashi says
the notion of repetitive counting
is an expression of god's love for the
jewish people
just as a minor
i'm sorry just as a miser rather will
count and recount his money over and
over and over and over and over again
because he loves it so much
so too god counts the jewish people
like a miser would count his money or
his jewelry and the like
so rashi says there's no particular
reason
whenever there's a pivotal occasion
in the history of god's relationship
with the jewish people god counts them
after the eggel god counts them to
cherish the jews that survive
that was the half shekel at the time of
the ego
and then when he's coming to put his
shakina on us
with the building of the mishkan he
counts us again so rashi says it's derek
but then rashi raises another question
that's very interesting
rashi raises the question
if you add up the half shekels as
reported at the end of shamos
you will get a number that is the same
as the population in bamidbar
000 with a remainder
now here's the problem it really
shouldn't be the same because
you are included in the count when you
hit your 20th birthday
right until you're 20 you're not
included
when you hit your 20th birthday
you're included
now if the first count was yom kippur
and the second count is eeyore
then anybody that had a birthday between
the afternoon and not on yom kippur but
the contribution of the shekel was the
day after yom kippur anybody that had a
birthday
between yom kippur and eer
if they hit their 20th birthday between
those two dates the population base
should be higher
so how is it shaykh that in seven months
nobody
reached the age of 20
which would increase the second number
now one answer you might give is well
okay
maybe
birthdays were balanced by deaths maybe
a certain number of people died
in those seven months
and they happened on those interesting
coincidences they happened to be equal
to the people who had their 20th
birthday
in those seven months and that's why the
populations are the same that is
certainly a possibility
but uh the reshanam point out that in
their judgments and they have sources
for this there are there were no such
thing as natural deaths in the desert
the only deaths in the desert are the
deaths that the torah records
uh nobody else died i mean plenty of
people died because the torah records
their deaths but since there is no
description in the torah of anybody
dying
between eeyore
between yom kippur and dior
our assumption is there were no deaths
so rashi raises the question how could
it be possible
that the population wouldn't be larger
because anyone that was born between yom
kippur and eeyore
who hit their 20th birthday would make
the second census larger
than the first census
so rashi gives a fascinating answer
rashi's answer actually is
that
the determining whether you were 20 or
not 20 was not a function of your
birthday
everybody had a uniform birthday and
that is rosh hashanah every tishrei
you became one year older
which means the following
if you were born in ello
one month before tishrei when tishrei
came you were now one year old
and if another person was born like the
preceding tishrei he would also be one
year old
and from that point every birthday was a
lockstep progression
on tishrei
consequently since between yom kippur
and eeyore there is no rosh hashanah
nobody became one year older anybody
that was 20 already the first time had
become 20 last rosh hashanah
right just 10 days before that census
which was after yom kippur and nobody
got older
maybe you had your biological birthday
between then but that did not determine
if you were ben esrim
because there was no tishrei
rosh hashanah between yom kippur which
is census number one for the day after
the yom kippur and eeyore which was
census number two so rashi says lockstep
i understand lahavsail that they use
that for determining the ages of
racehorses
that they get a uniform january first
birthday even if it's the the horse is
born in december
and i think i'm not sure in which
context that uh
chinese compute age of population that
way as well that uh
maybe that was part of the communist
cultural revolution that everybody has
the same birthday or something like that
uh but at least at one time
china china did it that way
another approach would be which i think
is also very logical
that the age of 20 was defined by how
how old you were at the time of the
exodus meaning
we didn't care if you became 20 in
between meaning
in order to be included in both the
first count and the second count
you have to be 20 years old at the time
of the exodus
so therefore
at that point that would be a fixed
number of people that would not increase
between yom kippur and er okay
b visit may
this is how rashi and other commentaries
explain
the significance
of the same number
between the first census and the second
sentence
and why are there two countings rashi
says derek
that is the way god expresses
his love and affection
but
i want to take this matter a little
deeper
and that is it is true that there was a
census after yom kippur
in the aftermath of the golden calf
and it is true there was another
counting of the same population base
in eeyore after the hakamata mishkan
after the putting up to the mishkan
but there were some significant
differences
in how the counting took place
and it's worthwhile to ponder the
differences and not just the
similarities
the first counting
was in many ways what you might call an
anonymous counting
people who were 20
simply dropped a half shekel into a
pushka
and moshe counted the half skullen
there was no personal interaction so to
speak
the counting was indirect
through
the computation
of the number of half shekels and we
figured out a population of 603
thousand by contrast
the counting in the beginning of
bamidbar
the torah uses the phrase
mispar shamut
now mispar is a very interesting word in
hebrew ms pyre can mean the counting of
names
it can also mean the narration li saper
lispar
to count
lists appear
to
narrate ramban says the following idea
first of all it does not mention in
bamidbor
that the counting was through shekels at
all
so one possibility is moshe of benue
literally had to count people
but even if we say
the counting of bamidbor was through
shekels as well
it was not a shekel that you dropped in
a pushka
it was a shekel that you directly gave
to moshe rabbenu in arun
and the ramban says
that that is the meaning of miss
barshemos
div
moshe rabeno your name
hi i'm reuven
here's my half shekel
and the ramban says very beautifully
it was extremely important
that at least once in your life
you meet
moshe rabbenu in person think about this
how many jews
had any connection to moshe rabeno
he was the one who gave them the mitzvos
etc he was a presence
but the truth of the matter is the
average person
never had occasion
to talk to moshe robino
you know if your milk spoon got mixed in
with your felicia pot you didn't go to
moshe and ask him the question there
were judges there were rabbis they were
posting
around
was much more a man of the people our
own o wave shalom row they shalom if you
had a problem with a husband and wife
aaron would handle it moshe rabena was
really not of this world in
in many ways his whole face was covered
up when he would go out among the people
unless he was speaking the words of
hashem
you didn't even see his face he wore a
veil he wore a mask
i mean you could imagine if once in a
while you would see him walking what
type of reverence
what type of fear would you have
so moshe rabeno in many many ways
by necessity of his position
was distant from the people
but the ramban says it was so important
that at least once in your life
moshe saw your face
moshe heard your name
it was important for you
and it was important for moshe
that it's not enough for a leader
to represent the nation
of israel
the leader must know that he's
representing
the individual people as
moshe sharer of a goodness israel
used to say
you don't just help klaus israel
you also help rebel israel grab the
individual person reby israel
so
one difference between the first census
and the second census
is the second sentence was anonymous i
dropped my coin and they just counted
the coins
the second census
involved a personal relationship either
by not having skull him at all you were
directly counted or as the ramban says
in miss barcelona that even if you gave
your skull
you introduced yourself to moshe
moshe would put a face
instead of a faceless
a particular face
that's one difference between the first
census
and the second census
the second difference
is
that in the first census
there is no tribal breakdown
we know in the aggregate there were six
hundred and three thousand jews by
counting the shackles
but we don't know how many reubens how
many shimons how many yehudas how many
suckers
because all we have
is the money that we the silver that we
count
so we know how many people but there's
no tribal breakdown
by contrast
in parashats by midbar
not only do we know a total of the whole
people
but we know
the individual subtotals
of each tribe
so the two differences
between the first counting
and the second counting
which really stem from the same factor
is the first counting was anonymous
so individuals did not
give the coin to moshe they just put it
in a box of some sort some type of
receptacle
and there was no tribal breakdown
the second minion is miss parshamut you
declare your name
individuality
and breakdown by tribe
now
these events happened within six or
seven months of each other
what does it connote
so we understand
uh everyone understands the importance
of unity togetherness about israel the
very fact that the counting of the
jewish people is to a half shekel we
talked about this highlights the notion
that each of us are incomplete unless we
link up to others because a half is
incomplete unless you take another half
and join it
right so the whole process of counting
is an exercise in unity and togetherness
but here's the thing
there are two different models of unity
that one can imagine when you're trying
to create
a community
you're trying to create a unity you're
trying to get creative togetherness
whether it's within a family a large
family or whether it's within a
community or shoal or yeshiva or within
omni israel
right like mark twain once said it said
about the weather
everybody complains about the weather
but nobody does anything about it
well in some ways avast israel
is kind of a sinatrina
is a very similar phenomenon we all talk
about it we all complain about it we all
moan and i include myself we all moan
and groan about how bad things are
but what do we do
concretely
to try to make things better right
so you want to make things better you
want to create actors in a community but
there are two different models that you
can have for actives
one
we will call a melting pot
and the other we will call a salad bowl
melting pot which was the predominance
philosophy
of cultural assimilation in the united
states in the decades of the 20th
century and the medina israel
in the late 40s the early years and the
50s and even into the 60s
was the notion that when you have people
with different backgrounds different
cultures different philosophies
you gotta kind of homogenize them you
gotta blend them together so these
individual differences don't stick out
because the more differences you have
the less cohesiveness you have so the
notion of a melting pot
was emphasizing obliteration
of difference
in order to avoid conflict
so that would mean for example in the
united states there was no such concept
in the early in the early decades of the
20th century if a spanish-speaking
immigrant or a german immigrant would
say hey could i have instruction in
school in a foreign language you're
crazy english is the language and that's
it
and generic israel you had similar types
of issues
of kind of taking away the
distinctiveness of the tai manim and
then and whatever it would be to make
them part of the state in fact in many
many ways that was ben gurion's agenda
and again i don't speak ill of ben
gurion he was a great man in many ways
ben gurion david ben-gurion
but his vision was very much the notion
of homogenization the only way you
create
a society from so many cultures and so
many countries and so many backgrounds
is you gotta make them the same same
language same experiences in fact the
notion of universal conscription in the
military was not so much a security
measure as it was a cultural
homogenization measure he saw that as as
a very important goal
part of the opposition to those who
don't want to serve in the army is based
on looking at that as a destructive goal
but both sides are admitting that that
was a goal
at least one of the goals one of the
goals
of even the army right you know so when
you serve in the army together for three
years that kind of joins you it combines
you it gives you a shared experience it
gives you a history
right which in many ways is
fundamentally important we have a common
bond
so we'll call that melting pot because
melting pot says you achieve optimal
unity
by obliterating differences and creating
cultural sameness
in recent years
in all
many many countries united states israel
europe
there's an alternative model
to melting pot
and we can call that multiculturalism
which you know it's kind of a negative
word in many ways and that is the idea
that instead of creating societies
based on homogenization
you create societies that celebrate
difference and diversity
recognizing that communities are
enhanced
when there are many many different ways
of approaching things
now obviously the downside of
multiculturalism
is great great divisiveness i mean this
was the problem of the muslim presence
in europe and to some degree even in the
united states in which the muslim
refused to assimilate within the general
norms of society and as a result there
would be violence and and the like
so the two terms i would use as melting
pot when i think of melting pot what i
think of sometimes is chomans i'm going
to use gastronomic analogies let's
compare a choline to a salad
so a children's right so you mix
together the meat and the barley and the
potatoes and the beans
so at some point these do look distinct
but imagine
uh cholanth
monday by monday by tuesday by wednesday
okay you're kind of stretching it at
that point at that point it just gets
consolidated into kind of an
indistinguishable glock in which you
can't tell anything everything just
melts together
a salad
you combine
lettuce and tomatoes and cucumbers and
peppers and chickpeas and mushrooms
whatever you want alfalfa sprouts
so you have different colors
different textures
different tastes
each individual component retains its
identity
but together
they have a synergistic
effect a catalytic effect
in which each one contributes to the
other
in a very positive way
in other words there is a model of unity
that is not based on obliteration of
difference
but a model of unity that is based on a
celebration of difference
community does not have to be conformity
community does not have to be
sameness
there be a community in which each
separate ingredient
contributes to the whole now you can use
a lot of metaphors
to express this idea
you can talk about a salad bowl as i
just said you can talk about a tapestry
the beauty of a tapestry
are the different colors in the tapestry
you can talk about a mosaic
you can talk about a symphony if you
were to simply play the same note over
and over again
same notes
you don't really have music music are
different notes
right different textures different
tastes
so there is unity based on conformity
and there is unity that is based on a
celebration
of differences that exist
so which is the better model
the torah is maramese
that sometimes you need one and
sometimes you need the other
and i would suggest the following
the first counting
represents the model of unity based on
melting pot
because the first counting
is anonymous there is no revenue there
is no shimon there is no laby there is
only jews
six hundred and three thousand
and we don't focus on individuals we
just count the money and we look at the
anonymous mass of people
that's the actus
that is based on melting pot
the second dominion seven months later
is an actos that is based on salad bowl
where the individual has an identity
the individual has a hachivas
and tribes are also important because
you know we sometimes forget how
important tribal affiliation is
in the torah scheme of things
tribes had their own nussie their own
prince
they had their own flag
they had their own position in the
desert
when they come to eric israel
tribes have their own sections of land
in fact in many ways you see in the book
of shoftim that sometimes tribes
regarded themselves as separate
countries
if you remember the very very sad story
at the end of the book of shofting
about pilage bhagiva there was a
concubine
who was raped and essentially murdered
mass raped gang raped and murdered
in
yemen's territory
and this was such an outrage that the
other tribes demanded extradition of the
wrongdoer to be tried for his crime
and the tribe of binyamin refused to
extradite claiming that they have
exclusive jurisdiction
over crimes committed in their
territory this is actually actually the
argument
and uh
this was a civil war the rest of quali
israel declared war
against the tribe of in yemen tribe in
yemen fought very valiantly and were
actually quite quite successful but but
obviously they were outnumbered
and eventually benjamin was on the verge
of being decimated being eradicated
yes yes yes
a civil war mamish in which the other
tribes waged war against the tribe of
binyamin
uh it is very similar to the american
civil war
you know people make a mistake people
think the american civil war was fought
over slavery
it was not lincoln was of course against
slavery but he would not fight a war
over slavery the american civil war was
fought over secession meaning to say the
southern states took the position they
have the right to proclaim themselves a
separate nation
the confederacy
uh lincoln said for that we have to
fight we cannot allow there and pelegus
bhagiva according to the ramban's
explanation
is exactly that issue
shavit benjamin consider themselves a
separate country it's like it's a very
interesting idea because essentially
david beyman's position is
every tribe is its own nation
we happen to have the same religion
okay so just like you have an italian
catholic and a german catholic and a
french catholic and an american catholic
so you have a benyamin jew and a ruvain
jew and the shimon jew but we're not one
nation and you don't have the right to
kind of give me orders
so
that was a wrong attitude but still
tribes are very important their tribal
consciousness was very strong now you
may ask
why does god introduce tribes
as a relevant criterion i mean don't we
have enough things that we fight over
that now i'm going to fight over ahmed
bin yeoman and you're a rubin
isn't it isn't the only thing that's
important that we're jews
why have tribal divisions okay colleen
levy i understand but beyond going levy
what difference does it make what tribe
i come from why does the torah make a
big deal
and the answer is
because the medrash tells us each tribe
had its own approach
in the service of god
each tribe had a unique spiritual
personality god did not want an ami
israel that's monolithic god did not
want an army israel where everybody is
the same there needs to be a ruvain and
a shimon and he is sacred as a bull and
tribes some tribes were devoted to
learning and subdrives were devoted to
commerce
and some were agriculture and some
served god through prayer and others
through charity
the very notion of a tribe
highlights the idea
that god wants the salad bowl
the tapestry the mosaic
the symphony
rather than the melting pot of
homogenization
and
that is ultimately what is desirable
so in fact the medrash makes the point
that the beauty of a garden
is in the diversity of flowers now there
are gardens
which only have one flower you can see a
garden that only has 10 000 red roses
that's not beautiful
but for most people they get they see
more beauty in different colors
than in one color
so now you'll ask me the question
so that's why the second census
is individualistic and tribal
because it represents a model of actus
that is based on diversity
and difference
so why was the first census
anonymous
the answer is
that the first census
was in the aftermath of a calamity that
threatens
the very survival of the jewish people
and god's covenant with the jewish
people
this was the faith
so what god is saying is this
there are going to be times of emergency
there are going to be times of calamity
there are going to be times where the
very existence of amicil is being
threatened
in those crucial times
you got to put aside your
individuality you got to sacrifice your
individual interests
right you know we say it's good to march
to the beat of a different drummer but
sometimes you got to put away the drum
think about the aftermath of the
holocaust
we had to work the other people
literally there were people literally
married like the first woman they met
basically you know that we have to
rebuild
by the way hashem those marriages turn
out to be very very successful
without courtship and romance there was
a sense of a shared responsibility
and
the holocaust survivors met that
responsibility
in a tremendous way
so the teres miramis
that there are times
that the
ah is so great
that you gotta put your private agendas
to the site
that's census number one
but that's temporary that's not the
long-term goal the long-term goal
as rashi says
when god wants to to truly put his
divine presence on us
you need the second census
melting pot
is a short-term necessity
in states of emergency
but the ultimate
goal of jewish unity
is a jewish unity
that is salable
rather than melting power
and that is the teaching of the second
sentence now i need to clarify this
because i've been saying the words that
god wants communities based on diversity
god wants communities based on
difference we celebrate differences we
don't try to squash them
now you understand that unfortunately
in the modern society we live in when
you see words like diversity like
difference
so
you think of that it's often connected
to
lifestyles
that are very very antagonistic to the
torah
i'm not referring to that now we have to
be kind and compassionate to all jews
religious and not religious like god for
it i'm not suggesting
any type of negative condemnations of
people
but when we talk about creating
communities that respect differences
i'm not referring to creating
anti-halakha communities
i'm referring to within the miscarriage
within the framework of allah
we have to appreciate differences
uh and
hashem we have them whether it's hasidim
different types of hussein different
types of muslim ashkenazim svardhan
different types of ashkenazim different
types of spartan
people sometimes say why are there so
many variations of even
judaism
that is not a weakness that's strength
that's the beauty of different
approaches in avodah hashem it turns
ugly
when it's a source of rancor and hatred
and maclocus
but in and of itself
it is the beauty
of many flowers in the garden
now we do have to understand that this
also means
we have to
enhance
respect
legitimate
the different personalities of people
particularly children
you know our educational system for no
other reason than sheer numbers
is basically based on a one size fit all
model
everybody gets the same instruction
everybody is pushed into the same way
let's imagine you have a child who likes
to write poetry or or likes to play
music
sometimes they will not have outlets
for those particular they'll be told
that's goish that's secular
that's not from enough
we want to make everybody into the same
model
but you know
when you try to put a square peg into a
round hole
something's going to break something's
going to give
shlo mohammed tells us
educate a child
a youth according to his way
his or her way
and what that means is the villenegon
says
every person has their way
their individual way
my goal whether it be as a parent
whether it be as a teacher
and in some ways even as a spouse
vis-a-vis my spouse
is to see the individuality and
uniqueness
of the other person
and not try to impose
some type of artificial model on that
person
that does not correspond
to the essence of their personality
that can break a person
that is one of the factors in the
phenomenon known as kids at risk where
kids go off the derrick
but it's worse than that
it's not only people who go off the
derrick even people who broke hashem
remain religious
but their spirit is broken
there's a depression maybe it's a
subclinical maybe it's not
you know classified psychologically as
depression
but a lack of enthusiasm
a lack of joy
in the abode of hashem
because they were never given
the opportunity the legitimacy
to express the individuality within
their personalities
we focus so much
on kind of a lockstep
in many many cases
that this aspect of personality
development
is very much frustrated
so we recognize there are going to be
times
in which you put aside your individual
quest
and you got to be a melting pot person
but the long-term
survival and flourishing of israel
is only when we recognize the
individuality
of each
[Music]
unit
each of us is needed
not only as an anonymous collectivity
we are needed
as individuals
and if we don't live the life that we
can as individuals
then hashem is not getting
what he needs from us
and the jewish people are not developing
as they should develop
so again this is once again something to
think about as we approach matantora
that has to be ish
that
does not mean conformity
but it means rejoicing and reveling
in the differences and the diversity
that can exist within the beauty of a
jewish community
and celebrating those differences so
miyako will help us
to achieve that thank you
[Music]
is