Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Why Wasn't Anyone Invited On To The Ark? [Noach]
14 views
Noach missed something that could have changed the course of history! What was it? Why was Avraham the start of Judaism while Noach wasn’t? The answer reveals the difference between faith and purpose.
Categories:Torah/Stories
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Okay friends, the story begins. Paras
Noah Noah was a very impressive person.
Noah was
somehow able to maintain
um his morality living among very
unmoral people. So unmoral that God
wanted to destroy them. All of them. Get
rid of all of them. And we know why God
wanted to destroy them. because they
were not treating each other with
respect. Their immorality impacted their
relationships. God doesn't like to
tolerate that. In contrast, like Rashi
says to the tower of Bavl, the
Babylonian tower, you God, they were
rebelling against God. So God says,
"Okay, I'll separate you guys. But if
you're rebelling against each other, I
have to totally dismiss you." God can
tolerate idolatry. He could tolerate if
we're rebelling against him, even though
that's not desired, but he's not going
to tolerate rebelling against each
other. But somehow Noah was able to
maintain
um his identity and be a righteous
person, not get influenced. The Torah
introduces Noah as an
a righteous person. He was
he was pure in his generation. And Rashi
asks the question, why was he pure in
his generation?
Um, just say he was pure. Like what are
we trying to insinuate?
You're pretty good. You're you're pretty
uh you're looking great today. Like
today,
what about the other days? Right? That's
what we're saying about Noah. You are
great today in this generation. Well,
what about the other generation? So
Rashi gives two answers.
based on various midrashim based on
various sources. Answer number one is in
this generation
he's righteous
despite how bad everybody else is.
Imagine what he would be like if he was
with righteous people. He'd probably be
even greater. That's the first
explanation. The second explanation
is he's righteous in this generation,
but were he to be in Abraham of
generation, he would not be considered
to be anything. And I say that with
quotes,
he would be nothing. If he were to be in
Abraham's generation, he would be
nothing. No. In other words, he's
relatively righteous because everybody
else is bad,
but he's not actually righteous compared
to righteous people. That's the second
explanation Rashi says. Okay, I I put
this in parenthesis because it's not
full point that I want to really discuss
today, but it's just interesting to note
that it says if he was in Abraham's
generation. Um, commentaries ask if you
look at the math, he was in Abraham's
generation. They over overlapped by 58
years.
Abraham was 58 years old when Noah died
and it it's they theoretically could
have met.
Um
unlikely that they did just but but they
were in the same generation. Okay,
that's a side point, different
discussion for a different time. Let's
take a step back for a second. Why was
Noah different than Abra? We don't
consider Judaism to be a noahide
religion. All human beings are
noahhides. All human beings are bound by
noahhide law. All human beings are
expected to uphold morality morality
like a Noahide as Noah did.
But Judaism is unique because Judaism
doesn't just attribute itself to the
Noahide lineage. We attribute ourselves
to the Abrahamic lineage. We are from
Abraham. Abraham is the patriarch not
Noah. Why is Abraham greater than Noah?
What was Noah missing that Abraham
uh compensated for? In other words, why
is it that he would not be considered
anything relative to Abraham to Abraham?
So, I'd like to share with you three
answers and each of these three answers
in its own right is going to teach us a
powerful lesson that we can hopefully
glean some sort of meaning from and
direction from.
Number one,
uh the the Zohoyar points out that
when God wanted to destroy Saddam, Sodom
Gomorrah,
Abrainu
begged with Abraham and tried to bargain
with Abraham, what if there's righteous
people there? What if there's innocent
people there? Um
maybe you should not destroy them. God
says, "Sorry, there's no righteous
people." and and they went through this
whole bargaining. Maybe there's 10
righteous people. Maybe there's 10
righteous people in each city. Maybe
there's nine in each city. Araminu was
begging and praying. What did Noah do
for everybody else? He said, "There's a
bunch of wicked people. Quick, there's a
flood coming." Instead of praying that
God reverse the decree or praying that
they do toua, instead he says, "Quick,
build an ark. Run everybody save
yourselves."
Okay? He was consed to build that ark.
Fine. But he didn't really concern
himself with everybody with with
everybody else. He didn't take anybody
else into consideration. He kind of just
did what God told him to do. Now, here's
an interesting thing. Why are we calling
him righteous? If he's righteous, why
didn't he pray for everybody? And if he
didn't pray for everybody, why would we
call this person a righteous person?
Maybe he just didn't think of it. Why
would I pray for him? So, one of the
answers I read from the
He explains that there's two types of
righteous people. There's the type of
righteous person who's very confident in
his faith in God. And then there's the
righteous person who is so confident in
his faith in God that that translates to
his faith in himself.
He actually believes that his prayers
make a difference. He believes that he's
consequential. He believes that he can
actually make a difference.
Arainu believed he could make a
difference. Turns out he didn't make a
difference in that particular instance.
God destroyed Som anyways. Good thing
but Arama believed he could make a
difference by arguing with God. when it
Rashi points out by the way that when
Abrainu
confronted God it says Abraham Abraham
approached God and Rashi points out that
there's very few times we use that term
vayash in the Torah you know when else
we used it when Yehuda approached Ysef
right don't take as captain and we know
that Yuda was ready for war the same
word he approached
Arau was aggressive when he approached
God. He was aggressive in his prayers
because he believed that he can actually
make a difference. He didn't just
believe in God, which was huge. It was
huge to believe in God back then. It's
huge to believe in God now, but it's
become normalized over thousands of
years. It wasn't normal back then. But
he also believed in himself. He believed
he was consequential. We believe that
his prayers actually make a difference.
Noah
was a believer, a believer in God, but
not a believer in himself. And by the
way, this is alluded to in Rashi in this
week's para. Noah was told to enter the
ark. And Rashi asks the question, why is
he told to enter the ark?
He had been building this ark for 120
years. At the end of the 120 years, it's
began to rain. The flood is beginning.
And God says, "Get in the ark. get in
the ark. He knows he should go in the
ark. Why would he be told or prompted to
enter the ark? So Rashi says
he was a believer and he wasn't a
believer. He was a partial believer.
Well, if he's a partial believer, then
why are we calling him a he wasn't a
partial believer in God? He fully
believed in God, but he believed in God,
but didn't believe in himself. He was a
partial believer. He wasn't a complete
believer. A Ramav was a complete
believer. He believed not only in God,
he also believed in himself and his
ability to make a difference. This is
one difference between Noah and Abraham
where Noah had fallen short where Abra
had compensated. Number two, we know
from various midrashim
that Noah had
um attempted to inspire people. It took
him 120 years to build this ark. He got
it from IKEA. No, I'm kidding. It took
him 120 years to build this ark. And the
reason why God wanted it to take so long
was so people ask Noah while he's on his
front lawn doing his work every morning.
Uh what are you doing? What is that big
project you're working on for so long of
building an ark? Why? Because there's a
flood coming. Why is there a flood?
Because you guys are horrible. You
better do toua. You better repent. And
how many people did Noah manage to get
on that ark with him other than his
family? Zero. Which is crazy. Imagine a
Kabad center open for 120 years and you
don't get anybody through that door.
Anybody. That is crazy. Why couldn't he
get anybody through the door? Not one
person was interested.
Not one person was interested in
embracing truth. Contrast that to
Abrahamu. Arainu had recruited thousands
and thousands of people
in the ways of montheism.
Where are any of them today? I don't
know. I'm serious. I don't know. I'm I'm
cur I wonder is there anybody who traces
their lineage back? Can we call
Christianity and Islam Abrahamic
religions, but they're offshoots of
Judaism? They don't trace themselves
back directly to Abraham. Maybe the
Arabs do. Some of the Arabs do through
Ishmael. But where are the people that
Abra had converted? I don't know. But
Ara apparently had converted or or had
recruited inspired
thousands and thousands and thousands of
people in the ways of montheism. The
Rambam says by the way that he had even
authored books proving logically proving
the existence of God. He wrote
theological books. So somehow Arau
was able to recruit thousands of people.
Noah was not able to recruit anybody
for 120 years.
Why? What was the difference between the
two?
The answer is,
you're going to love this. It's the
food.
Abra served food.
Noah didn't serve food. Just stood at
his porch. Anybody want to repent before
you die for your sins? And apparently
that wasn't attractive to people.
Who opened up a restaurant? He fed
people.
And he said, "By the way,
you think I gave you this food, but
where do you think I got it from?" "From
the farmer." "Where do you think the
farmer got it from?" "From the ground."
But where do you think the ground came
from? It all comes from God. And he
inspired people and even compelled
people to thank God to recognize God.
The way the lab puts it to me, this is
so powerful because if you ever need to
give somebody critique, got to think
about this. Noah didn't succeed in his
critique of other people, his rebuke of
other people
because he didn't care about the people.
He cared about
the mission. I have a job.
My job is to get other people to do
tush, to get other people to repent, is
to get other people to believe, to buy
in. And if they don't, well, that's
their problem. They're not getting on
that arc. I am.
that but that that's that was Noah's
attitude. It wasn't about the people. It
was about the mission. Araminu
took interest not only in the mission.
It wasn't just this is what God told me
to do. It was taking interest in the
people, the individual people. It was
talking their language.
It was talking to their hearts and
minds. That was his theological works
that he had authored. It was talking to
their stomachs.
I mean, I mean that literally. He was
talking to their animal soul.
He was talking to them. He was speaking
to people in a language that they can
understand.
He cared that they believe in God. He
didn't just care about God. You know
what they say that nobody cares how much
you know until they know how much you
care. It's great that Noah is inspired
and and has a mission from God.
and it's just going to do or okay that's
great but seems to have taken interest
in the actual people and when we care
not just about the mission but about the
people it's going to be a lot more
impactful
it's literally going to make a big
difference um this is probably the
secret to success of of any uh kabad
center or outreach center or really any
business
um If if you're doing outreach in sales
and you just care about selling and you
take no interest in the individual
you're trying to sell to, you're never
going to connect to that individual. It
just won't happen unless the person is
desperate for the product. But if
they're not desperate for the product or
they don't feel desperation for the
product and you're trying to bring them
awareness that they need this product,
you have to care about them and see what
their needs are and show how this
matches your needs. You actually need
this. This it's going to help you. This
is good for you. It's not just good for
God. It's good for you. There is not
just a right and wrong, which there is.
There is a right and wrong. That is what
Abraham came to effectively introduce
with God. That there's a right and
wrong. But there's not just a right and
wrong. There's a good and bad. In other
words, that which is objectively right
is good for you. That which is
objectively wrong
is bad. Not just for God, it's bad for
you. Abrainu matched truth with people,
the individual. Which is why it says, by
the way, the food thing. That's actually
what commentaries explain. It says
had planted an ael. What's an ael? An
ael is can mean one of two things. It
can mean like an inn. It could mean a
tree, like an apple tree, an orchard.
But in any case, he created some sort of
center with which to feed people.
That was one of his ways of inspiring
people. It wasn't manipulation like like
I'm I'm going to feed you now. I'll
slowly indoctrinate you now that I got
your It was taking interest in the
people more than he did the mission.
Number three, where did Noah fall short
in contrast to Abraham?
Okay, this one might appear to be not as
fair, but that life's not fair. So,
that's great. I'm kidding. Um,
you'll soon see what I mean. How did
Noah find out about God? Isn't that a
weird question? I'll tell you why it's a
weird question. Why should you need to
find out about God? The first human
being, Adam, did he ever find out about
God? He didn't find out about God. He
found out about people. He was created
by God. Of course, there's God. He made
me and I spoke to him and he spoke to me
and our first conversation was very
awkward or one of our first
conversations was very awkward. Why did
you eat from that fruit tree? And he
starts blaming his wife. Right? He had a
conversation with God. There was no such
thing as doubt. There was no such thing
as idolatry. There was no such thing as
serving anything else because God was
right there. It was two generations
later where Adam's grandson Enosh
suggested
that
you know God seems to give autonomy to
other powers.
The sun seems to shine pretty bright and
the moon seems to give us light at
night.
They deserve our thanks as well. And
here here was Enosh's plan. His plan was
not to totally cut out God. You know
what his plan was? He was being very
strategic. When you want to, let's say
you're selling a product
and you're selling a product to a large
company, a large corporation. You want
to sell a product to Facebook.
So, you know what you do? You open up
your Gmail. You type in Mark
Zuckerberg's email address. You say,
"Hey, Marky, I got a product for you.
You're going to love it." And you know
when he's going to respond? never
because he's the CEO of the company and
doesn't have time for my wonderful
product that he never thought of. So
what I do is I build a relationship not
with the CEO not with the top but
somewhere more on the bottom because the
people on the bottom are more
accessible. So Enosh thought
of course I believe in God but he's not
accessible but he does give
accessibility to the wind and to the sun
and to the moon
and he believed that they had autonomy
and he would pray to them not at the
expense of praying to God but in
addition to praying to God but what did
his children and grandchildren see they
didn't see him praying to God they saw
him praying to the sun to the stars and
to the moon and that evolved D into this
idolatrous belief that things have
power, independent power, and that there
is no god, there is no ultimate source,
there is no ultimate creator. And
because I can pray to things, I can
worship things and I don't have to
worship the creator, I can choose the
things
that fit my moral compass rather than
allowing my moral compass to object to
right and wrong. And that's where
corruption blew out. By the time Noah
came around 10 generations later from
Adam,
there was like so much corruption, so
much distortment,
so much confusion.
And for many, for most, the tradition of
God had been lost.
That wasn't the case for Noah. Noah had
somehow maintained that tradition. Noah
held on to that tradition of God. He had
received that tradition.
This is what the midashim say. He
received that tradition from Mushell.
Mushell was also one of the earlier
people, one of the oldest people to have
lived. And he learned about God from
Mushell. We know from Rashi, if you're
just reading this week's Torah portion
with Rashi, you're going to know that
Noah knew Torah
because God instructs him to take seven
males, seven females of the kosher
species on the ark and two of the
non-coosher species on the ark. And
Rashi says, "Well, how is he supposed to
know? He must have studied Torah even
though the Torah wasn't formally given
yet. But he must have had some sort of
relationship with God
who dictates what is right and what is
wrong, what is pure, what is impure,
what is holy, what isn't. There must be
some sort of objective morality that
Noah was born into.
So did Noah believe in God? Yes. Why did
he believe in God? Because he was taught
to. Not a bad thing. But let's compare
this to Arainu.
How did Abrainu who lived 10 generations
after Noah even though they over
overlapped by 58 years. How did
Aramavinu
discover God? Araminu asked questions
questions that were not popular.
Questions that were unacceptable
unacceptable questions like
who is the ultimate power? Because he
had that assumption.
Can't be the sun because that's being
blocked by the clouds.
It can't be the clouds because that's
being blown by the wind. And it can't be
the wind cuz that's being blocked by the
trees. And it can't be the trees because
that's being watered by the rain. And it
can't be the rain because that's coming
from the clouds. And it can't be the
clouds because they can't see the clouds
at night. Maybe it's the moon. The moon
is out at night, but the moon's not out
in the day. The moon trying to figure
out who is
who is the ultimate power. And through
deep thought Arab came to the logical
conclusion on his own independently
that there must be some sort of original
source which is the definition. This is
the Rambam's definition of God by the
way. How do you define God? Can't really
define God but the way of Ramavu's
conception of God just a primitive
definition of God. the original being
of which everything is dependent on
and whom he, she, it, whatever is not
dependent on anything. Right? It's the
question that every child asks is who
made Hashem and it's like how do I even
answer that question? The definition of
Hashem is someone who is not made but
only makes.
And Aramu literally figured this out
before God introduced himself to Ara.
Arau had a logical rational belief in
God. His mind took him there. When did
Aramavina, by the way, how old was he
when he discovered God? Anybody know?
It's there's different opinions
throughout the midrashim, throughout the
Rambam maintains that Ara was 40 years
old when he had discovered God. The
rivid. The rivid is one of the
commentaries on the Rambam and
it's like short little notes like
parenthesis where he just disagrees with
the Rambam. Disagrees with my monies.
You chose the Talmud that says 40.
There's another section of Talmud that
says three. Why not follow that one into
the riv that was more compelling that
discovered God at three. commentaries
reconcile it by saying that he began the
journey at three but he had become
confident
in sure at 40 but to the Rambam it was
more significant to highlight 40 than
three because if it's three
you could say he had some sort of
spiritual disposition he's a
three-year-old what does he know and
maybe he did have a spiritual
disposition but his mind took him there
and that's the significance of 40 is the
time of understanding some say you don't
learn cabala until you're 40 cuz that's
when you have complete mature
understanding that's why I'm very
immature
discovered God at 40 independently with
his mind and how did he teach others so
the Rambam says my moni says an
interesting um he uses interesting
language he says he planted faith in
people's hearts
doesn't say he preached at people or
even taught them about god I don't know
how he did this exact like in detail we
know that he taught and wrote books and
stuff like that and but it says you
plant it in people's hearts faith
because you know what you do when you
plant you drop a you soften up the soil
you drop a seed in and you allow it to
grow independently it doesn't need you
it needs a little water and stuff like
that but it grows on its own
allowed people to grow their faith on
their own somehow somehow he managed to
do that the reason why he was able to
manage to do that is because he wasn't
educated about God. He figured it out.
Noah did not figure it out. Noah was
just taught. In the when we reference
the voice when we reference the
patriarchs we say
and I don't know exactly how they
translate it in the sitter but if you
want to translate literally the god of
Abraham and the god of
and the god of why do you have to say
and each time or why do you even have to
say the god of each time just say the
god of
why the God of Abraham, the God of the
God of Jacob discovered God on his own.
Discovered God on his own and so did
Yakov even though they were educated
about God from their father. It was
their own discovery. It made sense to
them. They figured it out. Noah could
have figured it out even though it was
something he was taught. He could have
internalized it much deeper.
And if he did, if his internalization of
God, if his relationship with God had
that level of depth
where he also figured it out and didn't
just rely on a tradition, but it made
sense to him, he may have been like Ara.
He may have inspired tens of thousands
of people to change. And to me, this is
a powerful lesson. If we want to be an
inspiring influence,
are we just conveying things we know or
do we actually relate to it on a very
passionate level? Are we inspired
ourselves? Okay, that's my story and I'm
sticking to it.