Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Rabbi Efrem Goldberg hosted on Zev Brenner's Talkline on Abortion, Homosexuality & Transgender
1,859 views
Rabbi Efrem Goldberg discusses a host of topics, including abortions, homosexuals & transgenders in shul, and more. From an episode of Talkline With Zev Brenner.
Categories:Torah
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
you're listening to talk line with zev
brenner america's premier jewish
broadcast on the air since 1981
and now here's your host
welcome back to the program i'm zev
brenner
today is our historic first for our
program we've never entered rabbi from
goldberg the senior rabbi of the boca
raton synagogue in florida new york it's
a growing shul over 850 members the
first time he's appearing on the program
he's also one of the leading rabbis in
the united states he plays a role in not
just in the florida area but he's
involved in national organizations
including the biblical council of
america tibetan of america tradition
magazine aipac he has a very popular
podcast which gets all kinds of
prominent individuals including the
prime minister of israel probably from
goldberg thank you for joining us it's
an honor to be here thank you
thank you you've written some
fascinating articles i want to talk
about and pick your brain because what i
like is you're not afraid to speak out
not always are rabbis
it's a lot of rappers are reticent to
really speak out their position they'll
do it in sure but when you call them to
be public about it all of a sudden
they're they're they're reticent so
first i want to start with the abortion
issue the roe v wade that's the big
issue and people look at the jewish
community look at orthodox jews say well
the orthodox judaism has one position
when it comes to abortion it's not true
and you've written about it but let's
talk about the jewish position regarding
abortion absolutely every time someone
compliments me for having the courage to
speak out i'm not sure if it's courage
or foolishness it's a fine line between
the two um but you know to me i think
it's true and authentic and i think if
we if we speak respectfully and
sensitively and try our best to
represent what god wants on his torah
that's our responsibility and abortion
is a perfect case study you know we're
living in a time where we are
increasingly more partisan increasingly
divided increasingly politicized and our
rabbis warned us not to use torah as a
kardam lakhbor both they said don't take
torah don't take judaism and don't turn
it into a weapon an instrument don't use
it as a means to battle or fight with
others for other reasons or causes state
to true to torah and what it represents
so immediately when that leak came out
the leak itself is in gross violation of
torah egregious violation of morals and
ethics whomever leaked the consideration
of the supreme court but when the leak
came out you saw social media light up
and half of them said judaism is
absolutely pro-choice and the other half
said judaism is absolutely pro-life and
the answer is that judaism doesn't
conveniently fit into either of those
two it's nuanced and it's complex and
it's challenging and a person has to
immerse themselves in the study to
understand the details and understand
the minutia and the sources and to
understand that there are different
opinions
but we have a rich tradition of
disagreement so when you represent
judaism is this or is that you're
actually oversimplifying judaism torah
and judaism don't fit in 140 characters
on twitter they take a lot more than
that and we do a terrible terrible
disservice to advance whatever political
agenda to oversimplify or misrepresent
or distort where torah or judaism is on
something and i think our mission in
addition to the topic itself when we can
talk about abortion but the meta topic
even before you get into abortion per se
is that we should be advocating and we
should be examples of nuance that things
are complex and they're complicated
they're not black and white there's gray
we value life we believe abortion is
prohibited the default is that abortion
is wrong it's not a woman's right it's
not anyone's right to choose it's not a
function of your body it's a moral
decision it's part of the definition of
when life begins it falls under a legal
system and legal analysis certainly we
should feel strongly in a pro-life
context that we value life and advocate
for life and fight for life and we
protect the most vulnerable for their
lives however within that it's nuanced
it's nuanced so for example moshe
feinstein famously believed that
abortion was murder and therefore only
permissible when saving the life of the
mother only permissible in self-defense
if the baby is compromising the life of
the mother the viability of the mother
then you can abort the baby but there
are many other opinions and in fact i
personally as a rabbi have on several
occasions had to be involved in abortion
issues or questions of course never
deciding on my own my shoulders are not
nearly broad enough but turning to great
rabbis of our generation and really it's
the opinion of the titelies of oldenburg
who was more permissive and liberal on
abortion which i think many i won't say
most contemporary halachic authorities
follow in cases of rape and incest in
case
diseases that will give a very short
life
psychiatric ill
where the well-being of the mother may
be threatened in cases of production
there are many men
today where
she is not the mainstream and my point
is not to suggest that bush is not an
opinion doesn't mean it's
or those who follow it my point is it's
complex and when we simplify we do a
disservice so can politically land where
we may but if we represent torah and
judaism must begin by saying that we
don't neatly to either
the camps but rather we have something
in between
certainly stand for life portion the
default is is
we don't take it
we advocate
vulnerable however the the carve outs we
mentioned particularly the life of the
mother which even ramosa agrees but many
other carve-outs as well
i believe also if the mental health of
the mother of the state i believe that
sicily ezra says if the mother's mental
health is affected they're also an
abortion could be allowed i recently had
a case that a woman with a strong
psychiatric condition who had a history
of depression and knew the concern she
was not supposed to get pregnant again
the question the concern was with the
pregnancy and anxiety escalating she
could have suicidal ideation she was at
risk of suicide and i called them major
posing who told me the major postage
said to me ephraim it's not that it's
permissible she's obligated to have an
abortion if this pregnancy carries
forward and it could cost her her own
life because of her psychiatric
vulnerability she could take her own
life she's not only permissible she's
obligated to have an abortion
which is pretty strong language but
really there are a few different issues
that are a play and you're right about
it number one is that the problem is is
that people want abortion on demand as
opposed to looking at different
circumstances which is what you
delineate
the other issue is at what stage are we
talking about a few weeks a few months i
believe some some states want to have it
where you can abort the baby up until
birth
so these are all varying degrees and
this also has an impact on our
discussion about abortion absolutely
enormously we have demarcations before
40 days and after 40 days before 40 days
the talmud calls my obama embryonic
fluid that's not to minimize somebody
who's pregnant less than 40 days but it
means how logically the status of a
pregnancy less than 40 days is not a
full-fledged pregnancy with many many
consequences including a miscarriage
would the next child be epidemine there
are many consequences of it so 40 days
is a very significant delineation if a
woman were raped and she was able to
within 72 hours even prevent the
pregnancy from taking root let alone
aborting a viable pregnancy many more
postgame would be permissive so when you
can calculate tay sachs for example can
be diagnosed
within 40 days so that 48 to 40 day
delineation is a significant one others
see three months seven months the
facility is willing to go later into
pregnancy others only earlier into
pregnancy but that's why this area and
issue is so complex and complicated and
there's such divergent opinions among
our giants whom we accept them all and
recognize
ayluva elu that there can be multiple
truths there's a system we have to
follow it's a hierarchy we have to have
a fidelity to but there are multiple
truths that's why it's an injustice and
a disservice to simplify it certainly to
do so in the name of advancing a
political agenda but in general
though i would say and i don't want to
label but i will is the left tends to
portray orthodox jews as being barbaric
backwards not with the times so this
fits the narrative not just in the case
of abortion but otherwise say well
orthodoxy as well they have a different
perspective and some jews believe the
same thing too they don't know about our
heritage but how do we communicate this
message with what you have it's it's
it's very very much a message that they
know it's nuanced
yeah it is it is a nuanced message and
it's a message about nuance in this
partisan world where you're either with
me or against me you kill it there's no
in between there's no derek hazel the
middle way it doesn't exist correct i'll
give you an example actually at the risk
of uh upsetting some of your of your
listeners um because of that we're not
afraid of controversy here how difficult
it is for people to understand this it
goes back to the last administration
for some reason there were people who
were simply incapable
of
those including me to be able to
simultaneously say the trump
administration did unprecedentedly great
things for israel and for the jewish
people while i wholesale rejects so much
of his character or his behavior or
other aspects of what the administration
did a nuanced view that says i can
recognize the good be grateful for it
embrace it wish there was more of it why
simultaneously reject and be
disappointed in other aspects of an
administration or who a person was right
the last administration was a perfect
example of a world of with or against
you get it or you don't get it you're
either never trump or always trump you
had people who thought he was perfect
you had people who thought you're not
allowed to criticize how dare you and
you had others who said his
imperfections are so great how dare you
acknowledge anything good how dare you
be grateful for anything that was done
there's nuanced views life does not
conveniently neatly fit into
boxes and and i think again
torah is a great platform of nuance and
part of the charge and the mandate to
the jewish people is not to fall into
the trap of what's happening all around
us in washington and everywhere else
where everything is for or against
everything is partisan everything is
divided everything is you're on a
different team i love unpredictable
people who come to a conclusion about
this this way that that way they're not
predictable most people today you could
ask them three questions you know
everything about what they believe on
anything or you could just look at how
they're voted how they're registered to
vote and you know almost everything
about what they believe
we weren't designed to be that way
the world is complex we're complex torah
is complex it's nuanced and we should
stand for represent advocate model that
nuance in this world but by the way you
mentioned donald trump i'll get
political for a moment i believe in the
last election if i remember in the
numbers it's approximately 90 percent of
the orthodox jewish community supported
and vote for donald trump he's almost
mashiach he talked about him today so
your nuance perspective is not the
mainstream of most the majority of
orthodox jews
that well the nuance
it's very lonely place i'll be honest
over that last administration i felt
like i was in a very lonely place
vilified by both sides including as a
rabbi if you didn't by those who were
forever trump and thought that he was
you know literally uh the messiah of the
jewish people if you said anything
critical if you alluded or hinted if
you're critical of of things that
deserve to be criticized and that we
torah personalities should recoil from
then you were vilified how dare you not
appreciate all the good he's done and on
the other hand if you said you know
there were some remarkable contributions
some incredible breakthrough some things
that we truly should be grateful for
that no one before him and and we don't
know if after him anyone will do then
you are vilified by the other side how
dare you if a torah character be willing
to say anything positive so that's not
limited to the trump administration i
believe you met with president barack
obama and
he was not liked and i'm putting it
mildly in the orthodox jewish community
but he did do some good the iron dome
and i said this publicly he has to be
thanked for his support of the iron drum
people didn't like that either so we
live in times very partisan people don't
want to look and they say everybody's
completely evil completely good they
don't look at banner they don't look at
everybody in between it's a dangerous
world we're living in in so many ways
the world is increasingly becoming
unrecognizable every day from our basic
definitions and
identities and interactions and policies
it's increasingly unrecognizable and our
job i think that hashem without without
being too dramatic i really believe that
god is telling we his children hey stand
up and speak for truth with nuance with
sensitivity and with love but defend the
principles through which i created this
world before we find ourselves in a
generation of the flood before we find
ourselves in a generation of egypt we're
becoming so morally corrupt and bankrupt
that with all the progress we've made
technologically in medicine and so many
other areas we've met we've regressed so
far back morally and i think it's up to
us to not necessarily not necessarily to
not fall prey to some of the definitions
or fears or canceling or political
correction of the time with sensitivity
with love with nuance with respect but
also with firmness
represent and stand up for hashem and
talk about how we believe he wants us to
behave and how we should defend his
world so today the world we're living
and i was i was talking recently to a
congressman
and he said to me he's a phenomenal
congressman richard taurus from the
bronx and oh yeah we had him on he's a
liberal progressive candidate who's a
very big supporter of israel exactly
he's a phenomenal person and he said you
know we're living in a world where
you're rewarded for the wrong behavior
and you're punished for the right
behavior if you make headlines by
calling the other person names by
cursing by saying radical outrageous
things you'll pick up another million
followers
online you'll raise another million
dollars you'll win another term and you
are rewarded for your being outrageous
you are you're rewarded for being
adversarial and on the other end if you
say hey let's work across the aisle we
have a lot in common the things that we
can get done let's speak respectfully to
and about one another you'll have no
followers you'll raise no money and
somebody will rise and knock you out of
office so we're living in a world that
you're noticed you're noticed and you're
rewarded for the wrong behavior and
you're invisible and you are eliminated
for the right behavior and it's up to us
to change you see that by the way even
among jewish personalities the ones who
have the biggest followings online or
make the most noise often are the ones
who say the most outrageous things
they're the ones who get the attention
and they get the followers and so on
they get the the air time and the ones
who are saying the right things well
nobody wants to hear that that doesn't
make a headline you know so it's a
challenging time but we need to model
for ourselves and most importantly for
our children the way that we're meant to
be behaving
our guest is not afraid to speak out
robbie ephrem goldberg is a senior rabbi
of the boca raton synagogue a rapidly
growing shul of over 850 families in
florida he's also well
sought after speaker lecturer one of the
top brown boys in the united states
involvement in different jewish
organizations
we're talking about consensus we tend to
either go right or left there's no
middle i believe you got criticized when
you came out supporting the rabbi who
was held hostage in texas people sent
you all kinds of things about what the
rabbi does in his viewpoints and you
basically said that your concern for him
is regardless of whatever his viewpoints
are for just being a jew it wasn't very
popular with some people out there
correct correct that rabbi while he was
held hostage universally we were all
praying for him but what happened was
soon after his heroic release he threw
that chair they got out
people as is want to do today
dig up whatever they could find online
that he had ever posted or written or
whatever his beliefs were and they found
politically he was outside the pale of
what they want now first of all even
while he was held hostage his own
theological religious beliefs are
outside of the pale of what i believe
but what does that have to do with
anything if i had a son or a daughter a
brother or sister whose life was
threatened or held hostage would i pause
to say what kind of yamaka do they wear
where do they send their kids to school
do they open cans on shabbos or do they
end at rabino tom like would you stop to
ask those questions or would you say a
fellow jews life is threatened our job
is to stop and pray for them so i
actually found it deeply disturbing and
offensive how quickly we pivoted from
caring about a fellow jew to then we
discovered that that fellow jew
politically on israel is different than
us so debate rigorously take him on
rigorously debate with him rigorously
advocate incredibly strongly for what
you believe of course i'm i'm i'm all
for that but in terms of our care and
our concern for a fellow jew review
went to the jails did he first check
everyone sits us did he first check
their yamaka do you want to know where
they are in a two-state solution that
wasn't a two-state solution then but i'm
just saying our greatest heroes the
biggest sadiq
of our time in the past time they saw
the heart of a jew they prayed for a jew
you'll get back later to debating plenty
of time and plenty of room to debate
call that rabbi from texas and have a
debate about peace in israel but but
while he's held hostage and right
afterwards should have only concern and
care you mentioned you know it was funny
you would think about as you mentioned
by arya levine i was thinking about him
as you were talking because he loved
everybody he came from a karate
background he was the rabbi to the iran
to the stern prisoners in british
prisons he loved them all in fact when
they saw him even if they were religious
and there was on shabbos if they were
smoking a cigarette they put it in their
mouth so you shouldn't be seen by them
by smoking on shabbos there's stories of
holding the hand of murderers and really
he reached out and and he's something an
example and i recommend the book of
sonic nerd times and i'm glad you
mentioned him because that's how we
should be is not be judgmental we always
look to find the fault in somebody we
should be looking to find the positive
in somebody exactly i'll tell you my
favorite environment story zev is he was
walking through nakhla the little
neighborhood in which he lived and there
was a boy who grew up in the
neighborhood who had been avoiding him
he was weaving in and out of alleys
every time ravi levin walked his way he
would disappear around the corner and
finally he couldn't help it once by
accident of ireland ran right into him
so he said to the young man he said you
know i haven't seen you in so long where
have you been so the young man
sheepishly he was shy he was ashamed he
said to the tadik he said you know
said a few months ago i became less
religious and i stopped wearing a
yarmulke and i was so afraid to run into
you i didn't want to disappoint you i
don't want to upset you i've been
avoiding you so raj levin looked at the
man and he said the young boy and he
said he said you know i'm a very short
man i can't see what's on your head all
i could see is what's in your heart and
that's how he lived his life i can't see
what's on your head all i see is what's
in your heart now again and this is what
i wrote about maybe a month ago um also
is is the nuance the nuance position and
it's a very very fine line to try to
weave how can we on the one hand say we
know what a man is we know what a woman
is we know what marriage is
we have these definitions they're as
basic to us as is that the world is
round and nobody can tell us differently
this is the way god created the world
the definitions he gave us
he built into the fabric of creation the
distinction between male and female
masculinity femininity basic biology but
at the same time we also acknowledge and
recognize that not everyone feels that
they fit neatly into those definitions
so how can we maintain and preserve our
definitions and our policies
and at the same time show sensitivity
and welcoming and to confront bullying
of those who don't fit in that takes
nuance so you have segments of the
community you say this is what we
believe everything outside of that is
disgusting and it's a toeva and it's an
abomination and there's no room and
drive them away and you have others who
wholesale say this is the civil rights
issue of our time so therefore we
believe and we'll even officiate those
weddings and we make room and we will
reinterpret torah and what i'm
advocating for is that nuance position
to find to try to weave that fine line
it's very very difficult that says this
is our truth it's immutable it's not
debatable this is what we believe but
the fact that we believe it does not
mean that therefore we're a group of
bullies it doesn't mean that we're
insensitive or callous we care about and
we make space for the people who believe
differently even while we are
uncompromising what we believe that's a
very nuanced and a very difficult very
difficult but i think that the stakes
are very high to do that and to do it
now because i don't think it's a long
time and in some communities already
happening now
i believe that it's not a long time from
now in which we're gonna have
sensitivity training in jewish day
schools that talk about pronouns and
allowing children to choose their
pronouns and i don't think if we don't
stop this now and if we don't stand up
for what we believe now and again while
also developing curriculum against
bullying and while also making room with
sensitivity to those who are different
but
without being defensive and without
being apologetic standing up for what we
believe this is this slope is so
slippery and it's moving so fast that if
we don't act now we could have a lot of
regrets later i want to get to that do
you remind me of the sri dev who had a
relationship and a friendship a deep
friendship with i believe a professor at
the hebrew union college
who was criticized for having that
relationship and he says yes i know the
torah says somebody who's anti-torah i'm
supposed to hate them but i can't i
can't hate a fellow jew
and i think that's that's what we're
talking about over here
but how do we deal rabbi ephram gober
how do we deal with
gender sensitivity issues he she they
all the pronouns how do we deal with
gays with those that uh uh lesbians and
in the orthodox place because on the one
hand it's prohibited by the torah but
they belong to orthodox jewels a lot of
them are speaking out how should we deal
with it
it's a big question it's a big question
gender of course too right it's a big
question probably bigger for the time
that we have now um but we need to deal
with it thoughtfully and we need to deal
with it sensitively and we need to deal
with it uh in a principled way without
watering down or compromising what we
believe in so
i think to me those are the
um
principles that that drive us that we
have to have our truth and be
uncompromising in it but one of the
truths that we have is sensitivity
so for example the torah says that um
that gay relations gay intercourse is
clearly biblically prohibited it's
called the toevan abomination but so are
dishonest weights and skills so are
dishonest measures the people who don't
pay their taxes are are violating the
very same word of abomination or toeva
as those who experience these
interpersonal relations so the
interpersonal relationship we cannot be
material we cannot permit that which is
forbidden the torah doesn't recognize a
marriage other than between a husband
and a wife a man and a woman the torah
doesn't permit does not allow the union
the physical union of of two men
and to women is more complicated within
allah but also the torah is not uh does
not allow outright for that as well i'll
give you an example it happened to me
and i'm involved with different truths i
don't want to mention the name of the
shul but there was somebody who was
diving for the army when i walked in
they said take him off and he was at the
israeli day parade wearing a gay pride
button he's gay you can't have him down
before the audience the first one i
don't know who the person is never saw
me i'm not taking him off i'm not going
to embarrass somebody in the middle of
the show but there was a whole scene
about it so these are things which and i
understand where people are coming from
but to embarrass people it's not the way
the jewish way but we're seeing more of
that reactionary reactions in lots of
different places i just gave one small
example of that yeah you did the
advocacy is so strong that that's what i
think is creating you know for each
action is a reaction so the advocacy by
the gay community the transgender
community lgbtq these communities their
advocacy is so strong and so in
everyone's face so to say that it's
garnered an equal
reaction in the opposite direction but
that doesn't necessarily mean that's the
way we are meant to react so again is
there nuance is there room in the middle
that says that if somebody doesn't wear
it on their sleeve is not challenging
you they're not wearing their rainbow
color gay advocacy shirt in shul right
ensure they're there as an evident
trying to daven so is there room that
says while we cannot permit things that
the torah says are forbidden while we as
a shul could never give a family
membership to two men or two women we
couldn't give we couldn't recognize a
family membership where judaism doesn't
endorse a familial connection but we
still can make room in space what do you
do like in a school where you have
two lesbians or two gay men have a child
in a yeshiva and you send out a no do
you call parent and parent you call mr
mister
how do you how do you deal with these
are issues which are coming more
prevalent in some of the modern
orthodoxy schools they're becoming more
prevalent every day each one has to deal
with it with their own process their own
rabbis their own lay leaders their own
policies but i think that what the tools
that we have to use to navigate this
question is uh we have to stay true to
the torah so you you cannot call um you
you cannot call
a gay couple a couple a family they're
not a husband and a husband
that's the torah doesn't recognize that
on the other hand do you punish a child
who's been adopted or the product who
who's jewish and who wants a jewish
education and a jewish future do we deny
or deprive that to that child so how do
we carefully navigate what i'll say and
again this is a topic much much bigger
and broader let's have it back
more in depth yeah but i'll just say
this i i think that both sides are going
to need to be willing to play ball
meaning the the gay couple or lgbt or
whatever the the transgender and in our
show we had um a case of a of a man who
man wore garthel and a black hat and
underwent surgery to become a woman and
i was guided by again by gedola israel i
would never make these decisions on my
own um
during that time period what we do and
which side of a majitsa what kind of a
membership and how we function and and
uh there were interesting answers to all
those questions but
both sides have to come in with the
spirit of a willing to work it out if
either one is going to come in as an
advocate if either one is coming in as
as virulent if either one is coming in
as overly vocal it's not gonna it's not
gonna be able to find that nuance that
space that gray where we can stay true
to our principles and our values
unapologetic for what the torah and
allah say and yet make space because we
love you if somebody's going to get up
and scream how dare you not accept my
family membership as a husband and a
husband my gay marriage then if you're
going to challenge us
would you wish them if they had let's
say that boy who
is either the gay or lesbian couple has
a bar mitzvah do you acknowledge the the
the two individuals that have this child
has do you wish some mazel tov from the
pulpit i've not been put in that
position yet i say yet because likely we
all will at some point um but yeah how
do you navigate that how do you wish
your muscles up to the boy and how do
you acknowledge uh these two men in his
life who nurture and love and care and
are devoted without acknowledging that
they are married how do you acknowledge
these two men in his life
it never comes up or how do you deal
with it i think there'll be a lot of
wordsmithing that will have to happen we
have had to deal with and i think every
rabbi has or will you know what happens
when a member of the shul has a child
who has the same gender marriage do you
wish a mazel tov in the announcements
for that what happens this is not nearly
the same it's a lot less complicated
what happens when a single woman
undergoes ivf to have a child you wish
her a mazel tov on the birth of her
child outside the context of a marriage
um because she's undergone ivf again
less much less controversial much less
halachically complicated but also not
normative in the world than what i find
what i find intriguing though if you
have a situation where you have a couple
who have a child and the child into
marriage you wouldn't even think to wish
mazel tov from the from the pulpit you
know
but yet with the same gender same sex
marriage takes place they expect it it's
just an interesting way of how people
have different expectations and with
younger with younger it's even stronger
go into almost any modern orthodox and i
would argue by the way it's not just
modern orthodox i would argue you can go
into certainly out of town more
yeshivish places and you ask these young
people if you have a good friend who's
having a same-sex marriage and invites
you would you go
and you will be shocked by the high
percentage who say
look i don't believe it it's against the
torah but i'm happy for them and i want
them to be happy and yes i would go or i
would acknowledge it or i would send a
gift or i would have them over and then
you say to them but would you go if your
friend intermarries would you attend
that wedding
and they'll all say no and then you say
well what's the difference why would you
not go to a close friends into marriage
wedding but you would go to a close
friend's same gender marriage wedding
and they struggle to come up with an
answer i i think it's partially that the
world has positioned the same gender
marriage as the civil rights issue of
our time and therefore it's
discriminatory not to and i don't want
to be part of that i just want them to
be happy no matter my beliefs i think
ramos feinstein was asked a question by
somebody whose child was intermarried
and he asked for moshe should he said
shiva for the child moshe said no
because if he's sitting shiva it means
he's dead the dead don't come back but
it's a chance you know they'll come back
a few moments left rabbi uh we're
looking at some very important issues
robbie here from goldberg is not afraid
to speak out the senior rabbi the boca
raton synagogue a well-sought-out
speaker across the united states
involved in so many different jewish
organizations and one of the issues that
you got yourself in trouble with robert
goldberg was an event that took place in
january of
2022 which had the united states
ambassador david friedman and you had
ben shapiro you also had latino
coalition fiscal president pastor mario
bromnick and people were attacking you
for saying how can you have a missionary
in your shul it was a very pro-israel
event and we do believe in reaching out
to the evangelical christian community
but you got a lot of flack for that so
tell us what that was all about and they
said rehearsal was opposed they forged a
letter right they're saying that he
didn't allow you to do it all fakery but
what's going on the people go to such
length as they'll spread lies and
misinformation and print things which
are not true and fabricate documents is
this the torah way of doing things i was
shocked when i saw that it was shocking
you know is that i had a full head of
dark hair before that event
that's not true but um you know
unfortunately very few things shocked me
anymore and this is a consequence of
trying to do the right thing there are
things i've learned or do differently
not that i regret or think that we did
anything wrong um but we did this night
for israel israel look at the wave of
terror that's going through israel now
israel is constantly under threat from
our outside and from inside and what
what i found fascinating was the people
who are throwing arrows at me the people
who are the most critical and willing to
violate every line of of ethics forging
a letter from republicans
there was violation how can you attack a
jew with lies distortions correct
without benefit of a doubt without
speaking to you i was just appalled when
i saw that
death threats death threats to me to my
family to the entire shul you know that
there we received a horrific chemical
weapon death threat that the whole show
we have to spend so much money on
security for that night and why were we
doing this event the whole event was for
israel we had a thousand people pack our
shul to your ambassador david freeman
and ben shapiro and we recognized our
congressman he couldn't be there that
night a democrat my beloved friend ted
deutsch we had words from governor
desantis and from senator scott it was
an amazing night for israel amazing
night for israel nothing religious about
it and mary abramnek is absolutely not a
missionary and the latino coalition for
israel has done more is is still until
today advocating for abraham accords in
other countries is pushing south
american countries to move their
embassies to jerusalem they are working
and fighting so hard for israel and the
jewish people it's shocking they haven't
given up that work because of the way
they were treated but we partnered with
them again under the guidance of godol
israel they were great great rabbis who
absolutely personally i believe gave you
he gave you a probation for it his two
sons came to the event to show support
actually came um and there was nothing
religious there was nothing uh
proselytizing there was nothing
missionizing about it whatsoever
what's ironic about it again you know
for whatever reason these people are
decided to make me enemy number one and
to try to gain popularity because as i
said before you're rewarded for being
outrageous so if you make video after
video after video where you call someone
a monster and deserving of death and
describe them as being a missionary and
you say outrageous things you can get a
lot of followers you're going to try to
build your own persona or brand in that
way certainly not the way i would ever
want to build my brand but it was based
on lies and falsehoods there was nothing
true about it we ended up with an
extraordinary event and an event that we
advocated and continued to advocate for
israel and israel itself was was very
grateful that we uh that we held that
event so there was nothing religious no
missionizing no proselytizing simply
cooperating and the irony is that that
the jewish community is regularly
partnering with with uh with the
christians and evangelicals absolutely
in new york
gave a lot of money to orthodox jewish
organization i know some of them in fact
americana was the first person to really
go after the evangelicals to get money
for them i know if you're aware of that
but yeah
pastor
pastor hagie the evangelicals have given
money to
um rabbi grossman the disco rabbi and
meg del oro mcdonald
the evangelicals just last year a couple
years ago they made a big donation to
the assans cloisenberg hospital with the
rebbe's uh permission oscar
these um
montiado hospital great life-saving
tools were purchased in the hospital
from evangelicals or how about the fact
that a good of new york works with the
church when it came to corona and the
ability to reopen private and parochial
schools they work on a regular basis i
spoke to rabbi moshe sharer of blessed
memory who used to be regular cardinal
o'connor used to have breakfast meetings
on a regular basis it was confirmed for
me both by cardinal khan and by members
of their goodness so you need to have
relationships you need to work with
groups uh and especially in new york
where you have problems with
education and the state and the new york
state department of education getting
involved in curriculums this affects
jews and non-jews tuition tax relief
there are lots of issues that we're
working together with so uh people that
be aware of it but it exists
it was a manufactured controversy
because again it only benefits the
people putting out the fake news so it's
telling them
left you said you would do things
differently
with that event what would you have done
differently in retrospect yeah the one
thing i would have done differently is
not to at the boca raton synagogue
together with latino coalition of israel
i would have joined with other schools
in south florida i would have made a
much bigger broader night for israel
latino coalition for israel would be one
but that way all the focus and emphasis
would not just be on me and our shul
those who would gun for and hate what we
were doing let them take on all of us we
didn't do it alone now either we did it
with simon wiesenthal center was a
co-sponsor uh rabbi adlerstein who was
an expert in this area actually heads up
the interfaith work of the wiesenthal
center was a partner and a big supporter
in the event but that's really the only
thing i would have done differently i
don't regret working with the
evangelicals if we have to rely on the
jews for israel we're in big trouble
supporters of and by the way that's
changing the younger generation
evangelicals are not supportive of
israel unfortunately we have to work
about that too we need a birthright for
christians as well to go to israel
pastor mario brownlick what was his
reaction to all the brouhaha the
controversy did you speak to him about
it because i'm sure he was aware what
was going on yeah i did he was very
shaken by it he was very shaken by it he
was very deeply disturbed by it he had
his own expense hired private security
for several weeks because of the threats
that were going around
and it was deeply disturbing and as i
said we're lucky that he hasn't stopped
his work for israel he flies around
south american countries regularly
and he represents an enormous i believe
millions of of latinos for israel and
when he comes into a political office
and he advocates for moving the embassy
to jerusalem it carries weight and it's
a miracle that he hasn't abandoned all
this work because of the of the focus
and the lies that were spread about him
grateful for his work and the work of
others and again
we're not proselytizing we fight
missionaries we have to stand up to
missionaries but you have to be nuanced
and you have to be educated people are
not educated
especially if you're on the internet
people on social media on the internet
just because somebody sent you a link or
you watched a youtube video or they
what's apps you something doesn't mean
it's true be thoughtful be smart be
judicious in what you read and what you
listen to and what you watch know where
it's coming from and uh and know the
people that they're speaking about and
ask yourself does that sound like the
rabbi i know does that sound like the
community i know would they be in the
business of converting their entire
community to christianity does that make
any sense whatsoever so we have to be uh
judicious and educated consumers of
information will always be bad
characters they'll always be bad
characters spreading lies and
misinformation it puts even greater
responsibility on us to be careful in
how we access information we are from
goldberg senior rabbi to boca raton
synagogue he's a well sought out leader
one of the top jewish rabbis in the
united states and he has a very popular
podcast so what is the name of the
podcast robert goldberg podcast called
behind the bema an opportunity to hear
from a little bit these kinds of
discussions in the rabbinate what's life
like as a rabbi rabbi's children what
are the decisions we make how do we go
about the policies that we do
different holidays that come up how do
we prepare and the highlight is every
episode every week we interview another
major personality a jewish non-jewish
religious non-religious from whom we can
learn and gain and we've had really
diverse over 80 incredible leaders men
and women and uh we'd love if you
checked it out behind the bema
recommended and i apologize we never had
you on before this is the first but not
the last time i got to have you back
thanks to hear a voice not afraid to
speak out call look about keep on
speaking out thank you for having me
it's been a real honor and i really
appreciate the conversation
thanks for listening for continuous
jewish programs talklinenetwork.com or
our 24-hour day listen line at
641-741-0389
for past shows you can find us on itunes
spotify amazon youtube instagram and all
major podcast platforms or
jewishpodcast.org
thanks for listening to
thetalklinenetwork.com
us shows you can find