0:00 / 0:00
Rabbi David Kaplan - Weekly Torah Portion: Ki Tetzei - Forbidden Relationships
529 views
Follow us: https://www.hidabroot.com https://www.youtube.com/@Hidabrootcom https://www.instagram.com/hidabroot_global https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbCYZjl1CYoa4ulQIK2q Who is considered a mamzer? What are the halachick ramifications of forbidden relationships? Learn about the stringency and consequences of forbidden relationships. For more inspiring content: @Hidabrootcom
Categories:
Torah
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
so we're starting with the top it says a
little yellow top line in page 750 for
Louisville moms urbe Kahala Shem a
Monzer is not allowed into the the
congregation of a chef and to the Jewish
people Thank You Justin
Gondor Assyria ovolo bacala sham also
the 10th generation should not enter
into the congregation of a chef so what
it says here is a mom sir is not allowed
in to literally translate them I was not
allowed to into the Jewish people but
what that means is this is often
confused
is that a moms er is that allowed a
mother is Jewish if a mom whose father
is George's mother judge about his
mother is Jewish she's Jewish a man sir
means somebody who is born of an
adulterous relationship somebody is born
of an adulterous relationship now that
means like this adulterous relationship
in Judaism does not mean a child born
out of wedlock
a couple a man and a woman of a single
Jewish woman has a baby with a Jewish
man even if he's a married man that
child is simply a child born out of
wedlock that means he has no holic
limitations or a logic stigma whatsoever
if a father is a coin this child could
eventually become the coin gödel there
is no holic limitation on him the reason
why if a married man is involved it's
not considered adulterous relationship
because theoretically the married man
the married man could theoretically
married to women he could have a really
great asada and inherently prohibited
relationship Imams er is only if a
married a married Jewish woman is
involved only if a married Jewish woman
is involved that means that means that
if a Jewish woman who is married he has
a relationship with any man and she gets
pregnant as a child that child is a
mom's a limitation on our child our
child's Jewish the limit he's got to put
on tefillin he's got to keep Shabbos
he's got all the how long he obligations
the only limitation is on him is he is
not a lot to marry a mom's er may not
marry a standard Jew a mom's er could
marry another monser but then their
children are going to be moms Aaron and
could marry a convert somebody's
converted to Judaism but then their
children will be mom's area and there is
essentially no way for a mom's er to get
out of his mom's Ernest he had once a
moms are always about her the only way
that a mom tzer's children could become
nan mums er is if a mums er where mother
is allowed to bury a slave woman a
non-jewish slave woman so if he marries
a nine Jewish slave woman and they have
children the children are not Jewish
then he could free the children and they
automatically become Jewish and once
they become Jewish they lose their moms
or status but other than that a monster
is not a lot - marriage was a regular
Jewish women and it is not a good thing
to be a mom sir no the the the
ramifications are in the the obvious
question everybody else is but it's not
fair why is it his fault that as a
result of his parents doing something
wrong he became a mom sir all right so
the answer to any question is that it's
also not fair that one person should be
born poor his parents are poor so now
he's poor person is born without with
some sort of physical handicap is also
not fair if a person is born to a mother
who's a heroin addict so he's gonna be
your heroin addict that's also not fair
a lot of thing I get through one second
a lot of things in Torah that are not
fair it's not fair that you are any of
you Kohanim by the way anybody Ratko
hear me - what's your first name
great shyah shyah shyah great then you
have to wash our hands right and we get
to go into the base of me does you they
can't right now that's not fair I want
to be a Cohen but you can't be a coin mm
Elif cannot go where I could go in the
base of Megos mm l cannot serve the way
we conserve when my chef comes we'll go
into the basin maybe the Dove in our
milk cannot go in is it fair it's not a
lot of things are not true the question
of fair and out fair never applies in
Torah Imams there is somebody now you
went at the philosophical explanation so
you can always come into is if you need
an x-ray can always come out to the
kinds of a reincarnation that we don't
know who this child was in a previous
life and in a previous life it could
very well be
he himself fathered mom's Aaron then he
comes back as his Tico and his
rectification is that his neshama comes
back and he has to be brought back as a
mom to or could be God decided that
that's what he needs a Tolman for
something else or a challenging life we
don't know we never know in any
a specific instance why something is
happening to somebody in the absence of
prophecy we can only speculate I mean we
could we know the general I get a hold
of questions for a few minutes I'll get
talked about it we we can in the absence
of prophecy we can never say in any
specific situation why it's happening we
know general rules of white things could
be so for example we know that in
reincarnation a person who is a person
who is bad and immoral specifically
immoral in one life could be
reincarnated as a dog okay now being
reincarnated as a dog is bad right
because when you are reincarnated as a
human being you do not remember your
previous incarnation this is all based
on Kabbalistic ideas when your ring card
is a human being you do not remember
your your previous incarnation you don't
remember who you were even though some
people think that the deja vu is is
reincarnation I think that they Chavo is
simply deja vu or it's drug flashback it
simply means that you're spacing out in
the middle of a shear it doesn't mean
any book so that we don't know anything
any and you don't know who you were in a
previous life waiting come back as an
animal that you remember that you were
once a human being and that's very
apparently very humiliating as
Kabbalistic lee that's very humiliating
and and you could be sitting at a table
listening to human beings talking and
you'd like to communicate all that comes
out as a bark right answer you could be
sitting at a table underneath the table
being thrown scraps by your wife and her
next her next husband while you're the
dog sitting at table now the having said
that having said that that doesn't mean
how's that for humiliation how having
said that everything that means John
Kerry John Kerry who's married to
Henrietta Heights or whatever her name
is you know some mr. Heights you know he
may have come back as a ketchup bottle
you know there he is at the table where
giant Curie's using his hands is Heinz
ketchup as a segue is it his hair Powell
is here what he caught so yeah it's
pretty humiliating one of the most
sobering one of most sobering lines I've
ever seen in a Meldrick this is a very
sobering line the meddra says a man
could spend his whole life accumulating
money only to leave it to now if the end
of the measure to leave it to his
children so bad plenty of people do that
but the man who does he could spend his
whole life
accumulating money and
leave it to his wife's next husband yeah
that's pretty that's pretty sobering you
know it's worth being bankrupt you know
bad very you mean you left you spent
your whole life making ketchup so that
this guy could finance an unsuccessful
presidential campaign okay you know it's
enough to make me eat mustard you know
hey forget about it you know next time
around I'm doing this differently so you
don't know so if you ever see a dog ever
see a dog okay so you've heard the
concept now so then you just wait till
everybody leaves the room and when
you're alone with the dog you know he
turns a come on wait what you do we
don't know we don't we don't apply it on
an individual level because we don't
know so there's an idea there is a
concept of there's a kind of
reincarnation so if somebody is troubled
by the fairness of it the fairness of it
is could always be answered with
reincarnation though in any individual
case we don't know hold for a few
minutes I just want to give a very
important point here a person has to
know somebody who's a child born out of
wedlock a couple is living together they
never got married she's not a married
woman and a child is born now this could
be a plaque applicable in our day and
age where even a Jewish couple may have
lived together and they never had a
proper hope and condition they never had
a proper Jewish marriage they thought
they did they didn't they may have had
so so I'll tell you an incredible an
incredible situation in a second bit
which is in Jewish history recorded in
Jewish history as well so a person has
to know that even if he finds out later
in life that his parents never had a
kosher holic marriage so I've met Bali
Chu bizarre often devastated by that
there's nothing to be devastated by
because you are a hundred percent kosher
Jew 100% kosher Jew it may be a social
stigma it has no holic bearing on your
status whatsoever that's number one
number two in the nine Jewish world a
child born out of let wedlock is off and
I see a mums er how does the arts go
translate it a month ago simply
translated amount to the non-jewish
world's translate is a bastard but
that's really not an accurate
translation because in a non-jewish
world a bastard is also referred to
somebody who is born out of wedlock and
that's not what we call a munzur child
born out of wedlock is simply a child
born out of wedlock
that's not a miser the major there's a
world of difference in the halacha
gratifications I remember when David
Kennedy remember where I was one of the
Kennedys who was killed on skis he hit a
tree it was rot one of Roberts sons hit
a tree a few years back he got killed
skiing is playing football on skis so
David Kennedy the Kennedys are Catholics
and David Kennedy David Kennedy was
married they had three kids and they had
a babysitter and following in the rich
Kennedy tradition he had an affair with
the babysitter and his wife when she
found out about it his wife was not
happy so they had some shell and bias
issues and and so what David caddies and
so will do what the Catholics and
Catholics did not believe in divorce
Gaylord will just get what's called the
what he called a an annulment will get
an annulment but she applying Keene Tom
Utica logic understood what an annulment
means is that you are retro actively
saying we were never married that's what
an annulment annulment means we were
never married not that you're getting
divorced the annulment means there was
never a marriage here and so she went
into a panic because she said well if we
were never married what does that make
the kids so from a Torah perspective all
it does is it make the kids born out of
wedlock whereas from a Catholic
perspective the kids are bastards
because they don't make distinguish in
understand but in the whole like realm
there's a world of difference
what what is he mums er a mom sure is a
limited in others our definition of a
bastard their translating the word
monster
but there are two that I am unser is
when a woman who is married is involved
with someone other than her husband
that's a moms are or incestuous
relationships as well but that's not
it's common a woman who's married is
involved with another man and they have
a child that as a manager otherwise it's
over they have children those child is
born out of winners as I said he's got
no how lucky
stigma whatsoever he's not a monster a
corn in the divorce he is a hole the
child of a coin in a divorce you hold
which means he is a nan Cohen for all
kinds of purposes but he's not he's a
lot to Marius at youth rally route
they're very any other Jewish woman he's
simply at Halle front tons of purposes
he's not a he is not a toy he's a lot to
go to a cemetery he's that any Co hang
privileges he's got no coin limitations
he's simply a non Cohen but somebody
who's born out of wedlock he has no
holic stigma whatsoever another is a
case that I have documented at home I
have on my file I have somewhere in my
files at home I can't find it there was
a case here in Israel this was
documented this went to the this went to
the this went to the it was made it to
the papers a very strange story there
was a woman a woman came to Abbes did a
woman came to the rabbinic court and she
said to the Baisden that my son-in-law
who is married to my daughter and they
have 10 children was married to my older
daughter first for about three months
they got divorced then he married my
second daughter according to a law he
you're not allowed to marry your wife's
sister while the wife is alive a lot to
marry the wife sister and if you do
marry the wife sister than any children
our moms a room according to halakha
so what it happened was they traced the
story what it happened was this was an
Iraqi family and he was 17 and the
daughter with the older daughter was 16
they got married in Iraq they were
married for three months though they got
divorced the meantime the girl's family
came to Israel and they were living in
fuss he came to Israel some ten years
later and he married the second sister
how it happened I don't know
that's what happened those artifacts
attend children then this mother the
mother of the two daughters comes to the
basin and she says so the basin my
son-in-law Mary my second sister so the
day under several if this is true then
the whole entire family our mom's Arab
so then two weeks later she came to the
Bates as she said I just have to add one
detail I forgot to mention to you my my
first daughter was adopted I don't know
if that has any bearing on the case they
said well there's a lot of bearing and
they gave me God if you got the division
they're not blood sister so there's no
issue they said okay very good then she
came back to the base in two weeks later
she said I lied I lied
neither daughter has adopted my son
Allah threatened he would kill me if I
didn't make up that story but my
conscience leaves me no rest both of my
daughters are natural-born daughters the
daisen investigated and they passed him
that the entire family our mom's era now
what that means is that anybody who's
married and in one of the sons married a
guards they're married if they are
married so right they have to get
divorced
never get divorced so so it's a very
very severe situation Imams there's a
very very severe situation so so the
tourists as Imam did Allah to marry
regular Jewish woman now there have been
cases in Jewish history where there are
moms there there are big cases and it
has happened where there are people
whose mother was secular they if parents
got married child was got married they
got the boy they got married with a hope
in collusion with a good Torah marriage
got divorced she married somebody else
they only had a secular marriage and
then that child is 100% a 100 and a
mamzer with all the halacha
all the halacha ramifications so it's
it's a very there was a heartbreaking
case I'm I was a heartrending case after
the Holocaust there were certain
situations where you know women
disappeared now there's a lotta that if
a husband disappears
so the Bazin has to has to check to see
if the fine if there's enough evidence
of the husband's death and if there is
then the wife is allowed to remarry and
so she's an akuna
and I goona means a woman who is chained
because she can't remarry until they
know if there's evidence of the husband
has died now the
was a woman who was a dagoon a-- and
their habit you know the the problem is
that even if the Bayesian allows her to
remarry based on the evidence if the
husband does resurface then she has to
leave the second husband and she cannot
go back to the first husband so there
have been cases like that in Jewish
history she can't go back to her first
because she has been a woman who is
committed willing adultery even though
it was unintentional there's a
difference between forced and
unintentional a woman who's been
violated wound has been raped she could
go back to her husband unless he's a
co-ed a woman who is unwilling willingly
committed adultery but it was
unintentional she didn't think it was
adultery she is permitted to go back to
the first times we can't marry the
second element there's a terrible case
that came out of the Holocaust there was
a guy there was a rug in New Jersey I
think New York and in New York a Rebecca
fram-o shree and one day he comes to
elderly man walks in this is shortly
after the Holocaust
an elderly man comes in and he says look
there's a young rabbi in your town and
it's sometime after the Hawkeye says a
young rabbi in your town and his mother
was my wife before the war and she
thought I died in the war and she
remarried and she had him and she has
subsequently died and I am bitter and I
have one goal to be I was obviously very
bitter I wanted to destroy that young
man and I want to publicize to the world
that he's a monser and that his mother
married a man who when I was not yet
that it's on and so forth sir rabbi us
reset to this Rambla so you don't have
to publicize anything the fact that he's
a mama is already gonna destroy his life
that beats yes the divorce his wife is a
Liza's position and so on and so forth
those are the ramifications but these
were things that came up after the war
was very common Road moshe feinstein
himself by himself permitted over 2,000
women to remarry after the holocaust
were men people were disappeared left
right in saturday's questions were
coming up all over the place men
disappeared in Moshe fights in his Bazin
permitted over 2,000 women based on the
evidence to remarry and not once did a
husband resurface
the husband come back so they once a
show every bunch of fight scene how did
you have such a track record that do
thousand women and not one say you know
you're doing it based on circumstantial
evidence and it's a very tricky thing
because you know you have witnesses the
last time we saw this guy he was done
together he was in line to go into the
gas chambers at Austerlitz then if
somebody else's the last time we saw a
certain man he was on the train and the
way to office now is they had enough
evidence or not he hasn't been seen
since well they're playing people who
are on the trains and having it up not
dying and there plenty people who found
each other 50 years later so it's very
very tricky and bases enhance the
determined based on certain holic
framework when you permit her and when
you don't permit her so remote if I was
asked 2,000 women how come you never had
anyone who gives very much if I said
look I took on the responsibility of
Pascal Aloha
I studied the halacha and I ruled to the
best of my knowledge have to responsibly
doing what I had to do there's no way
that God is going to bring a disaster
through me if I've done everything
humanly possible with no ulterior
motivation so in in 9/11 these questions
came up in 9/11 because there are a lot
of men who were not who were killed in
9/11 and there were very very
heartbreaking questions one man one man
who actually called on the phone he
called his rubbish that I'm about to die
now then live again he died and then
they're good the quite they never found
the body now is that enough evidence the
fact that he call on the phone is they
had enough evidence how logically maybe
the guy's got an ulterior motivation
maybe he wants a mess his wife over
maybe once a disappear because he got
people he owes money to so these are all
questions that had to be had to be
determined there was one case where
Rafael Yasha was after we actually
actually sent a fact-finding mission
some of his closest disciples he had to
cite he sent them to New York after 9/11
because there were these questions came
up so there was one woman whose husband
disappeared husband worked in 9/11 he
worked in one of the one of the towers
and then they didn't find his body they
didn't find a body and they want to know
if she could get married really I should
said based on the available evidence she
could not get married
he said well obviously he died well not
obviously because sometimes a guy who
maybe guy owes a lot of money and fall
suddenly this is his opportunity to
disappear and everybody to think he died
he get away for his data sort of I said
he can't get married so so she they did
down allow her to get married about
months later she was walking through a
hospital she went to visit a friend of
hers the hospital she walks to the
hospital she looks into one of the rooms
there's her husband sitting on a
hospital bed reading a newspaper she
looked at his Hershel where have you
been you know you know you know men men
sometimes disappear with the newspapers
you know but this is a long time you
know her so her so where where have you
been and he's looking at her with a
blank look on his face it she's she's
you know she's just like not and then it
turned out that he didn't know who she
was when the building collapse he got a
clap on the head he had total amnesia
and no identity papers he was sitting in
that hospital for ten months now just
imagine if probably a she would have
just said okay we feel bad for a letter
remarry and she's married for she
remarries than the husband turns up you
understand uh I post a cast to go with
whatever whatever the evidence is that's
what the this whole concept of an akuna
and check you for they're gonna in so on
and so forth anyway that's what that's
what a monster is okay somebody had a
question earlier Gill did you have a
question so I mean yeah
good good good question
excellent question excellent question
that's actually the question like
they'll say a woman is is is inseminated
nap through an act of cohabitation
remember moshe feinstein was asked this
question it's a very good question and
the answer is that he found the
precedent for this in the talmud because
the talmud discusses a situation where a
man has bathed in a tub and he had a
emission at a seminal emission then a
woman bathes in the same tub and she
becomes pregnant from that and based on
the Talmud the child is not a mother the
child is not imagined there's even a
question oh they came through a boat to
find him by a couple that could not have
children and the wife went to a sperm
bank without her husband's knowledge and
she got herself impregnate as husband
could not have children and she went to
sprang got herself impregnated and then
became a question number one what is the
status of the child and number two does
the husband have financial
responsibilities as if it's his own
child to raise them to pay for the child
so remote refined she said no on both
counts if the child number 1 is not he's
not a momager and number two the husband
does not any of the financial
responsibility as it wasn't his idea
wasn't it's a Holika does not condone
that but this was this was post facto
this was post facto and you thought that
rabbis only get questions like what
happens if my flesh expel into my milk
fire right how do i how would you like
to have the answer to answer these
questions though they've had questions
they already have questions on on what
they call a with a surrogate mother
right now where she provides free womb
and board right and a woman a woman is a
woman is is the buddy called is
contracted to carry the baby and now
whose baby and then they've had cases
where she doesn't want to give up the
child now who does a child belong to are
logically so how it's like they have to
prosecute that gentleman you thought
there being a rabbi yeah once in a while
I forgot y'all of the elbow to Ice Age
ma yesterday again it's a lot more than
that these are the types of questions
that Rosa finds you the remote advising
and revolutions of the world have been
answering okay yeah yeah I gather
person is the reincarnation it could be
a dog or the person that sees regrinding
a person he can't remember stuff correct
but I don't know what he with all due
respect to anybody who said it I don't
know what was heard I don't know who
said it
I don't know I have a policy I don't
comment on anything anybody else anybody
else has said because I don't know what
was said how was said what can fix it
was said of how it was taken out of
context what his sources are and in the
fact that they think that with hypnosis
that that's recaudación well maybe the
right and maybe they're wrong maybe
they're bringing back something that he
heard in this life you know they it's
all speculation I only go with the Torah
sources I don't know what it could be it
okay it could all be right you know you
could all be correct ago of everything
but I only know what the Torah sources
and they've done in hypnosis they could
bring out you know the little of some
guy you know and he starts singing in
Italian you know when he never didn't to
Italy in his life yeah but you never
know maybe maybe he watches TV show when
he was little and in background some guy
say you know there's an Italian opera
where some woman was wailing and Italian
about how her husband killed her
boyfriend and in he any happened to what
he called he epithet he happy to hear
that he didn't even know that it
registered subconsciously so we don't
know you know we don't know okay in
anybody Li Rana could be that we were
both around in a previous incarnation
and you owe me money right so that needs
to be established right let's look at
some hypnosis here you know okay
take a look take a look at Pier Club
valid plus a plus a good test sorry
coffee mou test Kokomo your test and it
says like this page ten fifty six it
says low C echinacea need be no Cyril
a Jewish woman should not be a UH how
does he translate it a promiscuous woman
she should not be promiscuous is a woman
who just lets herself go with anybody
anybody
villarica database or the man should
also not allow himself to be to be
become immoral when he's used with four
other men then the next POSIX says like
this loss of e s nuns ona
do not bring the exchange of a harlot
whom appear caliph in the price of a dog
base Hashem Aloka
look hold Ned therefore any vow he saw
us at Chemeketa gosh damn it is the
abomination of God anybody who does it
that means as follows a person decides
one day whence a pledget offering when
the time it abase amitav just there you
know what I for example a guy says I
pledge I pledge a Corbin slummin I'm in
a good mood I did well on my test
yesterday I'm gonna bring a peace
offering to the base of mania so I have
to bring a sheep I'm gonna bring a lamb
as a peace offering okay no Amanda
there's a woman and a woman pledges such
a thing where did she get her lamb
she served she she works as a harlot and
somebody paid her for her services by
giving her a lamb
giving her a sheep a harlot is a Zona
and and what he call in and somebody has
paid her for her services by giving her
a sheep or a lamb
she's not allowed to bring that lamb to
the base of a dish it is considered not
only uncouth and I think it is
considered downright the turqoise as an
abomination it's abominable to bring
such a thing though you know where did
he get that from it's like the guy I
heard a story it's a true story
a guy was at a cemetery yes he has to
rub this Shila he went to a cemetery and
he saw that somebody had put flowers on
a grave now you know the Jewish
tradition is we don't put flowers on
grids and put a stone on a grave we
don't put a flowers on a grave don't put
him okay these guys at the cemetery and
he saw a secular Jew there visiting a
grave but a guy put a bouquet of roses
on I'm the great and the tombstone which
is not a proper according to halakha
this guy waits for them to leave and he
takes the bouquet of roses and he brings
it home to his wife he says here honey
for you for you alright
what's the occasion just a Tuesday
afternoon no kid you know yeah listen I
would I would go to seminary to get you
get you roses if I had so you know I
know the white boy though I've never
asked him and he never talked could you
imagine can you imagine a wife that
being asked a guy where did you get him
from I just plucked them off a grave so
bad
could you imagine though it would
probably be his last words right so you
didn't say any so let me came to a
locking authority to ask a lot of you
authority two questions number one is a
conservative deception is a Guinea Vaz
dasu number two is it inappropriate to
take it even if the guy
made a mistake putting on it there was
the Shila that he yes see understand
there's something uncouth certain things
in life are uncouth where did he get the
roses I got them off her grave yeah you
understand so the Torah complex as a
woman decides she wants applied to
corporate database so what does she do
she brings the land where'd you get the
land that was hers give it to her in
payment in exchange for her services
Thor says it's an abomination
furthermore over a few minutes to refer
the word to I says I I traded somebody I
got I have a dog vicious I have a dog
and I give you our baking exchange I'll
take a lamb for the dog and I saw you my
dog right a dog is considered by
definition a low creature a dog there's
certain animals are considered different
animals a lion is considered something
honorable you know if you ever called
ever refer to somebody by naming some
animals carry with them certain certain
connotations if you're ever in business
say that guy's a real snake right that's
generally not complimentary you know the
guy's a shark that's generally not
complimentary say that guy's a lion who
he's a lion
he's a llama he's a real llama llama
I guess this guy's chilled you know this
guy this guy takes a long nap after his
children's job it sees a llama so
there's certain thing to say somebody is
a dog if somebody is a dog usually used
in that usually used in the feminine
form direction it's generally considered
uncomplimentary to take something that
you've traded a dog for I gave you a dog
you gave me a sheep and I bring it to
the base I make gosh that's concerned
uncouth not only it's uncool two-thirds
it's an abomination what's wrong with it
is the commentaries say he could
sometimes turn into a rationalization
because I woman rationalize as well how
I'll go into this profession but after
all I'm giving a carbon to the base I'm
ENGLISH once in a while it serves as a
potential it's a potential
rationalization for inappropriate
behavior therefore the Torah says you
should not do it okay now I want to go
to the next okay this is one that it
needs a lot of clarification yes
a dog is a lowly creature so if I get a
lamb from you in exchange for a dog what
did I pay for that lamb you paid a dog
it's so it's just just so inappropriate
that's so inappropriate that's right our
dogs are getting a lowly creature dogs
are considered brazen my dogs have no
sense of shame dog dogs will meet in
public as opposed to other animals which
are much more discreet and therefore a
dog is always considered a lowly brazen
creature okay now take a look yeah
please go just here we're talk about
specifically asleep there is a special
holic class called a slave there's a
special holiday you have purchased it's
like there was a slave trade the old
days what a refugee nowadays would be
called what category falls into I really
don't know because now you're also
trying to super see wait you run into a
problem over here of superimposing a
secular situation which never existed
before is he considered an escaped slave
I don't know I don't know you have these
are what are called the eretrians in
Israel that of Jeff grant is a very
difficult to say but international law
they don't have passports what the
rights are what the rights aren't very
very difficult I couldn't even begin to
speculate you'd have to ask you
everybody I'd be curious if you ask
rabbi braid awaits and I'd like to hear
what he has to say I don't know here the
Torah specifically they are going to in
general when the Torah describes the law
before we go and start making
comparisons in in in the projecting and
at something else we have to know yes
otherwise we assume it's no because the
Torah is giving you a specific scenario
okay now they're too hot locals here
that I want to get to two laws over here
which are both very related pier 24
chapter 24 Pyrrhic Aleph 1058 okay and
both of these are questioned well these
are issues one of them is probably a
bigger issue that you will confront or
be confronted by somebody who's looking
for an explanation therefore it's
important they have this straight on
page 10 58 is four lines from the top
kikiki she should move along what a man
marries a woman and they live together
mahogany law seems arcane but you know
she does not fight favor in his eyes he
matzo by Airbus devar he found that her
behavior was questionable it doesn't
have to be that but this is one
situation the cus of look safer
creaseless he should give her a document
of severing what we call a get but get
the nos on biota he puts it in her hand
his she'll call me beso and he sends her
from his house that means the Tauri here
is talking about how divorce is
contracted a man is married to a woman
what's wrong I mean it's a Torah law the
torah law the man is married to a woman
and for some reason she does not find
favor in his eyes and they have a fight
whatever it is they want to get the
worst how do you divorce how do you
terminate a marriage in not hide law a
couple is married if they agree to live
together as husband and wife and a
couple terminates the marriage by
agreeing to go their separate ways
that's under Noahide law in torah law a
couple is married through Hoopa in
condition with two witnesses and they
terminate the marriage through a
document called a get it's very
interesting because the word get is the
only time in the Hebrew language that
you will find the letter gimel and the
letter tests next to each other it's the
only time that they find it you will
never find a word where a gimel is
followed by a test and what's
interesting is that they get it-get is
is the severing of the two the two are
never gonna be together again okay now I
mean gives us a wife again so people ask
all the time why is it no no it's not
related to get out of here no no why is
it why is it that only according to
halakha
by the letter of the law only a man
could give the get nowadays a woman
cannot be forced to accept to get
against her will unless the Basden was
the Bazin says that she has to accept it
by torah law a man can give his wife a
get against her will a wife cannot give
her husband a get number one there is a
Torah law if a Basden rules that a wife
is entitled to a get for example the
husband's not supporting her dozens not
providing her with her marital rights
the husband is beating her there are
certain times where the Bazin will rule
that the wife is to be given I get
nowadays since beza does nanny
the power of enforcing it a woman could
end up also being what's called used in
the vernacular it's not the / it's not
the it's not the pure meaning of the
word but a woman is referred to as an I
guna she is a woman who doesn't have a
husband but she can't marry somebody
else because I was holding her up for
again and sometimes the husband won't
want won't give her the get until the
family pays money he's actually
blackmailing her now in the time where
their Basden had Authority if they ruled
it her husband has to give it yet and he
didn't then the basin has a rights to
beat him and the way the Rambam the way
that law puts it as they get has to be
giving of your own free will and it says
: oh so they beat him I'd she Omer wrote
sunny until he says yes I want to give
the get so the Rambam asks one of the
famous questions around BOM asks well
obviously he doesn't and the only reason
he does is because you're putting him in
pain so the Rambam says no that's not
true every jewish man wants to do what's
right but he has a yates Ihara as an
evil inclination that is preventing him
so what we do is like infractions we
cancel out we cancel out the y8 Sahara
with a piece of rawhide and then what
you're left with is his free goodwill in
order to give the get that's what the
rounds have done you cannot hire thugs
you can I could only be done by Bey's
then there have been in recent years
even in Jewish and within within the
last even Haven that our day and age
there are certain basins that are
willing to give a rabbinic order there
I've met guys who have worked for basins
one guy who make do it men who worked
with a taser gun to convince
recalcitrant husbands to to pod to give
a get but that's only if they're sent by
a basin and it's a very very very
controversial thing because you're going
against the law of the land but there
have been cases where where men are
committed people are commissioned in
order to say to procure getting fabric
Elsa turned husbands there are people
who do it without the Taser guns they
just go in and try to convince the
husband's to give their wives getting
and this happens all the time
so the Torah says that only a man now
the question becomes why is only the
a lot to give they get why can't the
wife wants you by the letter to law she
has to get him to give the get why can't
the wife your husband get it seems on
one side it doesn't it seems very
one-sided here so the answer is very
logical answer very logical who did the
marrying who married whom he married her
in other words what happens under a
chuppah when you see a couple get
married when a husband gives a wife a
ring what she's doing for lack of a
better term for lack of a better term we
determine Inglis to describe it for lack
of a better term
she is transferring ownership of herself
to her husband that's what she's doing
that's why the husband has all the
responsibility in the marriage contract
he's got to provide for her support her
financially and otherwise because he has
taken her as his property and she is now
under his jurisdiction well if you've
purchased something the thing can't walk
away from if you buy a table the table
can't one day say well I want my liberty
right you have that you have to release
the table I'm gonna use that as an
example sorry okay you like that a Rolls
Royce okay if you bought a Rolls Royce
the Rolls Royce can't just leave on its
own you have to put the Rolls Royce out
say okay this rolls right as Hefner
anybody who wants could take it
so the halacha says very nice since you
were the one who acquired her you're the
one who would have to release her that's
why the husband only the husband can
give cannon each kid give again a wife
can initiate a get wife could addition
again but that would have to go through
a basin and a Bay's I knew I had a
friend who's whose sister was it was was
held up for I I remember when they got
here I was about I was about 15 this
guy's older sister was getting married
she was about 21 and she's marrying guy
was about 30 and his parents were
against the marriage parents are getting
severe I was at the wedding I remember
because the guy was dressed in white he
was so cool it's okay all draw all white
I just saw it is a wow that guy is
really cool and I get a year later they
had a baby and about a few months later
they were already separated and for
about nine years he felt that the family
has money which they did and I think at
the time he wanted a hundred thousand
dollars which is a lot of money and they
didn't want to pay him so one of our
brothers suggested just hiring somebody
to kill him which which by the way works
as far as releasing her but it's not
permissible oh yeah it's very efficient
you know if you killed a guy
so she no longer needs to get but but
but but it doesn't work according
although you can't do that and you can't
even hire thugs to beat him because if a
guy gives a get under duress it's called
giving a get under the rest that is not
a valid yet and therefore she goes off
down til you feel good he gave her again
but she's a fully married woman I know
what case where where this was ratified
by the rub on him I don't know what the
limits are a woman whose husband also
had they'd split up and he wouldn't give
her again except if she would give him
some money
and she found out about his business
dealings and she proposed going to the
IRS to let them know what he's doing
unless to get is forthcoming and to get
was forthcoming so they had also
required rabbinic intervention to know
that it's not what's called a force yet
otherwise it's not a valid yet these are
not easy say what for the husband to
take money it's not it it's perfectly
acceptable it's perfectly acceptable
because that he's giving it over his own
free will it's perfectly acceptable it's
not the right thing to do he should give
the get once he decides to give the guys
I'm a nice thing to that's right the get
it doesn't invalidate to get though does
not invalidate to get the it is but he
should he's being a jerk but but there
are many husbands and many husbands who
do that some who either get married
never been cases where a guy got married
initially because he knew that I'm gonna
get married and we're gonna split up
really quickly because I want to hold up
her father and that was the most
efficient way to do it there have been
cases like so a guy who does that is
that certainly not something you give
sleazy to ensure you know he's not a
very nice person but to pay for the get
pretty to pay for to get is is
acceptable according to law but I give I
personally know of cases where guys were
guys were can I knew one one crew that
worked for a Basden they grabbed the guy
in the street to grab the husband and
they stuffed him into the trunk of a car
and he drove him to the East River in
New York didn't say a word
there's grabbing on Street put him in
the trunk oh god hold on didn't say a
word they drove him to the East River
they dangled him upside down over the
East River then they took it they
crumpled to makeup put him into the
trunk and drove him home and a couple
days later to get was forthcoming maybe
the guy got the hint right and then I
met this guy who's a taser gun
they said that you know they hit a guy
with about what is it how many bowls of
five thousand five thousand volts and
while he is apparently it's
uncomfortable and while he is writhing
around while he's writhing around on the
on the ground they used subliminal
suggestion and they say things like you
know there's a Jewish woman who needs to
get you know and then they get generally
threat but that's only if it has been
condoned by a basin and even then even
then Bay there have been bases they've
gotten in trouble with the law because
you don't have a right to do it there
have there was a case recently where a
couple was was doing it they're getting
paid for their services and again it
could work as a get but it might be
against the law and you might go to jail
and therefore in and certainly nothing
can be done on your own yeah Jessica for
The New Yorker New Jersey or something a
couple was just kid and I got the hint
real quick there your thing real quick
again if it's not they did get arrested
yeah kidnapping silly go if Gila gets
you one second if it's not ratified by a
business not a bail yet yeah he could
good question and other good question
the husband can do anything he wants
with the money because again what only
thing the Torah limits is what the Torah
limits is it a nice thing to do you know
that's are they you know it's it's it's
only what if the Torah doesn't limit it
for us to project and say well this is a
Content that's almost endless what about
a guy what about a guy who made money on
a shady business deal you know they're
there's so many things where a guy
squeezed somebody so even by the letter
to law he managed to squeeze them and it
wasn't unnie didn't stole if the money
is stolen no money is stolen oh the guar
so if you steal money to do a mitzvah
with it you don't get amid suits in
Aveiro but it's like making a bracha and
pork the guy he's gonna eat pork and he
says well at least I'm gonna make a
broth on it so you can wear says like
where you say it's on my example where
it says this not a maverick it's not
somebody that's a midnight 8th season at
agonizer
he's a provocateur he's he's in tagging
that's not a mitzvah to do a mitzvah
what are you doing in Aveiro it's not a
mitzvah guys gonna make you eat a piece
of pork he says I'll make a charcoal on
it it's not it's a guy steals money to
give it a sucker we don't believe in
robbing hoods it isn't there that's a
mitzvah hubbub Avira submits are done
throughout there that's not a mitzvah
but a guy who got the money so at the
end of the day by the letter laws I'm
prohibited to go and then say you can't
use it for certain means it'd be
difficult for us to it might not be nice
but to go and actually say that fits the
category we don't have the authority to
do okay
the Torah doesn't divert the yeah yeah
yeah yeah that's the that's the kid Asia
yeah yeah that's a good question what do
you do with stolen money what should you
ever do with stole the money generally
the generally the the if you steal money
you have to give it back to the best of
your ability you have to try to figure
out how to get it back whoever your
stolen from insurance company yeah give
it back to you the fact that the fact
that they also steal from people doesn't
justify you stealing from that other day
hey you know that's endless especially
for Jews you know there there there
there's absolutely
you