Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
PR okay good morning dear
friends today we're going to
analyze the r and the rivid uh not a
long share today but something uh
substantial in the sugya
of
[Music]
however if somebody makes in the TOA
then we say is making an by the
parchment it's meaningless but if you
say then you mean mean the names of
Hashem in it the way the ran learns the
Su you take a look in the
ran um it's
about eight lines
down the
is he says we're not talking about Nadar
we're talking about a you made a you
swore by the t t the
the call someone who swe someone who
makes like I wrote
earlier and the reason why thean says
that we're talking about a is because a
is not
a so how you supposed to swear by a
to the reason a to is it's not
a so talk and your intention is the
names of Hashem that are in it because
when you swear you have to mention the
name of hm there two ways to swear you
could say you swear or you could say by
the name of God I'm not going to do this
that's how the ran learns the ran learns
this whole Su is talking about shua we
mentioned that the rivid on the fourth
wide line disagrees and he learns the
gamar simply that we're referring to
making a NE I what NE are you
making how could you be madf by a Tyra
the answer is you could because the
names of
the r considers let's see the r inside
it's quoted in the on the fourth
line it's an
actual if you say this to me by
the it's
meaningless because you're only
being by the
parchment but if you
Say by what it's written in
it this Kar is to
me with what is written in
it
it's like someone
who
why because your mind is on the mentions
of's
name and then the mentions of's
name because through the
writing K and the preparation for kadus
Kad they're
holy so the rid learns the gamar is
simply we're we're not talking about the
subject of we're talking about the
subject
of I it's
not it is you are m
your mindset is for the mentions of's
name and the mentions are
why because by
writing preparing it for
Holiness if you say you mean the
sanctity of
that's not exactly like the rid the
rivid says the names of not
the okay that is the of the rivit that
the gar does not have to
be we don't have to learn the gar in an
unusual way but
means so so now the question is why
didn't the ran learn like like the rid
why would the ran uproot the simple
reading of the gar and say we're not
talking
about and you mean to swear by the names
of God that are mentioned in it why
doesn't the ran feel it's reasonable
that the names of hasem in a are
considered a so we have a few different
Pim we have the P of
rski in the
in his commentary to
Thea again we're trying to understand we
mentioned the rid learns
the that we're talking about somebody
who made a and you made a by the name of
hem which
is according to the rid why didn't the
ran learn this way and the ran was the
simple reading of the gar that we're
talking about soes abramsky says
that this would not be considered
a it's true that the Kad of the names
of the person creates but the person
creates it through
a not any kind of
Declaration that
he's designating it Kad it's through AA
so if you need AA that indicates it's
not a
says you can't make it in
a through what you say with your
lips only through an act of
writing
inski I just saw last
night said that of all the the one which
is
most uh glat in terms of it is rovski
the rski says
that we see from the
rivid that a certain position is taken
in the world
of the riv says
since
through SOI points out the names of AEM
Are
Holy but they're not
AER so how could you be
ma aren't you matus in the element of
the aspect of prohibition you're matus
in the element of Holiness so we see if
you could be from
we see that works even on something that
just has Holiness without any
prohibition so this would explain the
Ran's position the ran would hold no you
can't do hatasa on something that just
has Kad it has to be
with however rski points out if you look
in
the he brings from
that you're not allowed to be from that
are and even
itself that the shame of it is written B
so you can't get Han so there is in
the so it
is by the way so then the question would
be then why if you're
manad in the sa itself and the
is but the also
has I guess how would
toski is quoting fit into
aramara but again he's just bringing up
a that maybe the opinion of the ran is
you can't be mad on the because this
would be
a that maybe is not user again even
though he's bringing there is a that
there is an in the kadus maybe that's
not
unanimous here's a third interesting uh
aspect that the sa
brings you're being Mist in the name of
Hashem
okay so does that mean just like you
can't erase the name of Hashem you can't
destroy that Kar is there
an in the
kar are you to
be not just even if you want to say that
there's an okay you can't get Han on the
kar but if you're M from the is of the
shame of hem so does that mean you can't
be Mas the
kar he
says the names
of the Asar are only holy but there's no
iser simply you should not be able to be
m in Kad if there's no
is so he brings from
the that maybe your mat in
the so he says really your your matf
from
the the Kad which produces the is is
so you're going to learn out just like
you can't erase the name of hm you can't
eat how do you extrapolate from an to an
is a
so now the question is so would that
mean there's an when it comes to the
anyway these are two possibilities of
why the r did not want to learn the Su
like the r again the does
say so why did the r say we're talking
about a the rid was able to learn the
that we're talking about so either like
the says that is not in because it comes
not your words or like rovski points out
the are but they're not
necessarily they're not necessarily
unless like that
of that there
is that's just one point
in and this week we learn about
have a good day everyone
