Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00

Noach: Birchas Hatzadik - Likutei Ben L'Ashri Al Hatorah Shiur

449 views
Rabbi Daniel Glatstein Official avatar
Rabbi Daniel Glatstein Official

Transcript

Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.

Welcome everyone to this week's edition of on parasyak. You could get with free shipping at our site rabbidgi.com. You could actually get the safer for free at saferyra.com. If you want to participate in the art scroll edition of please contact us as soon as possible. Paras I'm going to put the up on the screen and we're going to see two pieces inside this week and you could access the of the who says anyone who learns his says it over to others commits to for you says the on you come with your whole household to the writes. Why was it necessary for Hashem to save with the TVA? There are many ways Hashem could have saved Nyak. I'm sorry says the reason is is that Noak himself could have been saved any other means even without a children and wives who needed a to be saved here writes was a complete he could have been saved even without a his wives not sell. They were only able to be saved with the and the feels that this is very difficult with forgiveness for the honor of the splendor of the Torah. It almost seems like it's been hidden or forgotten that which say that why did only ask for 10? Why did excuse me why did Abraham only pray to save in the merit of 10 she didn't ask to save for less so he said was eight they were not able to save their generation from the what do we see from here we see that our sages held that even and his wives were complete. They could have even saved their generation, but they didn't have 10. They needed 10. But had there been 10, they would have been very high level to save the whole generation. The one even though they were they were only eight. They were only eight. So says the that implies had they been 10, they could have saved everyone but they're only eight but there was no question about their status as complete sadikim. So therefore asana on what does mean that only noak's children and wives needed the but not well they seem to have been as great as was although you could say to defender that the words do imply that only himself was a actually the the words of are that in some way is excluding his wife and children. So you could say that even if his wife and children were whole very high level sadikim but not quite the same level as nyak who is a sadik tim and he could have been saved even without a ta but maybe the wife and children they needed a ta although they too were a great great sadikim. Then theatalik has a fascinating piece which is reflective of his general approach to where there are many later events and even discoveries that are alluded to in the where on the heb this was the floating on the water like on two beams. What does that mean? That was floating on the water like two beams. It would seem this is a reference to the wisdom of railroad tracks that its ability and its entity, its creation was in potential. Meaning it the idea, the concept was in potential. It was in conception, but it did not come to fruition. It did not materialize until the time that Hashem designated in the in the sixth millennia. So, but there's nothing new. So sagana understands that the description of noyaka is a portrayal of what a railroad is. Why kazal using this terminology if not for to reference and to allude to the concept of the railroad which was in conception at that point but did not come out to fruition until its invention closer to our own time. Wishing everyone a successful week.