Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00

Journey to the Czech Republic 2024: Holishev - The Life of The Shach, Rav Shabsi Cohen

200 views
Rabbi Daniel Glatstein Official avatar
Rabbi Daniel Glatstein Official

Transcript

Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.

this Torah class is brought to you by Torah anytime.com okay shum everyone after that that short trip from the to the you know it's very noteworthy that we're going from the to the sh first of all the sh is the primary commentary on the and furthermore the Shak married the son the Shak married the daughter of the great grandson of the Rama so the Shak was married to descendant of the Rama and the Shak was born in 1622 the most extensive commentary on youra is the Shak does anybody know what year Shak was written in it was written in the year Backes Kesh is the year 1646 the greatest work ever written on y was written when the Shak was 24 years old brings the it's a dla the Shak wrote his commentary at 24 years old the further points out that if you read the sh you'll see that he had also written a commentary on the Torah in the which we don't have and that's something he wrote even before he was 24 years old I'm going to give you a little sampling because we know that the Taz was published the very same year and the Taz was much the Taz was much older than the Shak and in that very same year both of these were published I'm going to give you a little sampling of between the the so in that if more than animal all you need to do is to make one however if the talks and he's between Shing one animal and the next so if he speaks about something that's connected to the he does not have to make another but if he speaks about something not related to the he would have to make another bra that's the day that speaking is not a he it's not a separation and he should not make another the like the first that you always make another this is the the like the second comes the Taz and the Taz says that since the brings down both de and he doesn't give any conclusive ruling it has a d of a saf and we utilize the rule SA this is what the T says the sh on the other hand Pas like the first opinion now the sh in his humility wrote a commentary on the Taz called and in the reason why he called it he wanted to show humility to the Taz as if the Taz is zah the Taz is gold and he is merely kasf so he says no he says emphatically and unequivocally it's not a because many follow the first and therefore you need to make a now this is something which is not so well known who do we Pas like the Shak or the Taz whenever there's the the the in Po and follow the sh in Ash follow the Taz but in general we usually follow the rulings of the sh we're headed to the of the sh which was published in the year bakes bakes the Shak was published in the yeares 1646 so the little what city we in halev you've just experienced another another Torah class brought to you by Torah anytime.com