Daf Hashavua - Nedarim 22b

This Torah class is brought to you by Torah anytime.com. Okay friends, now we're going to do anyone who gets angry. Even the itself is not valued significant to him. Russia the wicked man in the arrogance of his anger. He will not seek out Hashem is not in his musings. What does it mean? Um that means he says he says Hashem will not punish me. I am immune says Rashi says the in the height of his anger says the says he forgets his learning and he increases his foolishness. Anger rests in the lap of the fool and the fool increases his foolishness. So about he is like a fool and if he's a fool he will increase his foolishness says the ran. Um we see someone who gets angry is a fool. The Gmorra says the son says not sinned then all they would have been given is the five books of Moses and Yahushua. they would have only been given the five books of um and why the um Yeshua talks about the value of the way was divided. Why would the other books not be given? The other books are books of rebuke with a lot of wisdom is a lot of anger. What does that mean? The wisdom in the Naveim would be reflective that Hashem's angry at us. So the fact that we have these books shows Hashem was angry at us. Had he hashem not been angry at us, had we not sinned, we wouldn't have needed it. Says for Yeshua, the fundamental uh basis of the other was only to reprimand the Jewish people. for the sins in their possession. Had they not sinned, if they wouldn't have sinned, they would not have needed rebuke. Why only because it's the arrangement of safer of Joshua speaks about the cities in Israel and the inheritance. Therefore, even had we not sinned for we would have needed safer In the abundance of wisdom of the other prophets sim that is symbolic is reflective of the abundant anger that angered Hashem. The holy gar continues. Okay. Now uh we come back to the Indian of the darasi said now which it's not ai it's okay just pointing that outra we will not help we will not get involved if somebody literally made another tok Hey Israel. Now what does this mean? There's a basic over here. The run learns that when we say in it doesn't mean we don't matter the nether of someone who says Hashem's name. And if someone does not say Hashem's name, we won't be m the critical factor here is not saying Hashem's name, but rather um what we're talking about over here is versus meaning according to if somebody makes a we are not mate I but we could be mu If we did it, it's effective. But you can't be m What does it have to do with? Because very often people swear by the name of Hashem, but has nothing to do with the name of Hashem. We are madim even if you use the name of Mu even if you don't use the name of Hashem. The rush disagrees. The rash says that it's not dependent on versus. It's not that we're mad. we're not matter it is we will not be m anything that you mention Hashem's name and we will be m if you don't mention Hashem's name so it means as follows in other words according to the way the ram learns the ram learns means we don't matter okay except for except if a person says I asked her my wife from getting from me because she stole my wallet or she hit my son and it turns out that she didn't steal and she didn't hit him. So Raasi is saying two exceptions the two except the the exception is you know when we're not m you know when we are m the exception is if the ne was you answered your wife so now it's marital issue and you answered her for a reason and it turned out that the reason was proven to be false so if both of these conditions are met then we could be Even a take a look at the run. Now, you might ask a question. If it turns out, friends, that he made the nether because his wife stole the purse and it turns out she didn't, then what does it have to do? Then why would you even need a pesak? Shouldn't shouldn't it just be on its own? Because he did it for a certain reason and that reason proved to be not true. Look in the Some say that our is a mistake if it turned out that she didn't hit him and she didn't steal. How could we say, isn't this because the guy made the thinking that his wife hit the kid and he never she never hit the kid? Even if we're dealing with avoid said it's possible that we have the that which we learned in the Mishna then in such a circumstance we don't need a that's only if you say you know that's if the guy says I only made the nether cuz my wife stole my wallet but if but if she wouldn't have if I would have found out she didn't steal my wallet I never would have made the nether but what if the guy says I made the nether because she stole the wallet but I would make it even if she didn't steal the wallet then would be then one who upholds his words even so I don't want her to get enough from me then here the reason why it would be is because we're talking about where the guy says even if she didn't steal the um Oh, you is um sharing this thing. [Music] Yeah. I hear I think there's another place where discusses it further. Okay. Now according to this that the reason why you could be mate is because the guy says he would have done it regardless. So what's the exception here? Because in this case there are two things. There are two factors here. Number one, one factor shalom bias that we're talking about a between him and her. So that's one reason to try to be mad and and another factor is it's somewhat similar to um but he writes that even if it turned out that she did steal it. it and we and meaning others say there's only one factor is needed the factor of the so why does the garra pick a case that it came out that she didn't steal it in other words like this the garra says that if somebody makes a nether that um he answers his wife to get ho because she stole the wallet then we'll be m the nether if Turns out she didn't steal the wallet. Some say, well, you need both factors. You need the factor that it's and you need the factor that it's somewhat like because it turned out that she didn't steal the wallet. That's how the raja learns. Other rishum learn. It's simply because it's between husband and wife. So why do why does it add that it turns out that she didn't steal the wallet? No, that's not davka. That's what the Mishna says, but it's lavka. But the Ran says he doesn't like the abshot. He prefers the shot of the rajbah that it's because you have two factors over here. The garra continues. Somebody came before Raasi. By the way, this is raasi. So just like on the previous you had ai and rai here also someone who came before. So he said how did you make the what did you say? So she said, "Hey, I swear by the God of Israel, if you just would have used the phrase, which is a then I would have been able to your now that you didn't make another then I can't help you now. So what exactly does this mean? Because we just said earlier that we don't matter any choice. This implies it's only when you swear like hey let's see the run is like we said in the first part but Um, we do not help out. We do not service. So basically this ga is saying different than our ga is if you would have just swore regularly which is a we would not have been we would have not been. So now that you swore with God meaning this is consistent with what said earlier. We are not we will not be mu ever ever even if you swore without using Hashem's name certainly if you use Hashem's name if you made we would service you this opinion holds for alone we would service since he mentioned Hashem's name and That's not consistent with what we said earlier. The Gmorra continues visited the house says taste something. He said no master of everything. I'm not going to eat it. said no by the master of everything you won't eat. Now what is going on who said no I'm not going to eat. Why did say no master of everything I'm not going to eat. What was Rab adding? Meaning Rab was the one who invited him. So why is he now swearing that you shouldn't eat? This is what he was saying to him. He was saying, "No, you're saying the master of everything, then you can't eat. If that's what you said, then you can't eat. He wasn't affirming. He was saying that if that is what your statement is, you're not going to be able to eat. Look around was swearing that can't eat. I know you said you really said that you're not going to be able to eat. So Gomorrah says what's the is you could even be with we had a shila on could you use could you use even only a quasi pes like if you would have known that 10 if 10 people would have calmed you down or could you have to use a pes proper soar is saying we use even look in Not only do we use, we even use for and the contin swears we will service their says. It doesn't matter if the guy was holding a even if he made a withholding a holy article is only making you swear to frighten you. But the main is with the name of Hashem or with a Okay. And here's the final stretch. Thank you for your patience. Ra praised toman about he's such a great person. said, "When he comes to you, bring him to me." Once had to be and he came to said, "Did you make another with this and this in mind?" Yeah, I did. Many times tried different things said, "Yeah, yeah, yeah, I knew that." of get angry. He's annoyed. Is that a he said to go to your canopy went out he opened up a he said look I annoyed somebody this is not good practice said what's the right path in life what's praiseworthy by hashem and by people What is the correct path? A person should choose. Whatever brings glory to he who does it and brings glory from other people. The correct path is if others are pleased with your actions. Got upset. I never made a nether with this in mind and m it for him. Um and mattered it for himself. One more he also had a to m. So he came from the did you make the with this and this in mind and many many times they said yeah yeah yeah the rabbis were distressed they were going from the sun to the shade and the shade to the sun they're trying to come up with a way to be m button braid But the son of said to listen if you would have known how much you're annoying the rabbis that they have to go from the sun to the shade for the sun would you said no and they were mate okay Rabai we did with the help of the almighty um maybe we should have and Ian share about kas. We should have like a ind depth about kas maybe. We'll see. Have a good night everyone. What? I'm looking. I can't. You've just experienced another Torah class brought to you by tora anytime.com.