Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Okay, good morning everyone.
We're continuing
daf
siman kuf sameach zayin seif zayin.
Reuven was washing his hands to eat.
Yaakov was
making the bracha of hamotzi.
Yaakov had in mind to be motzi all the
listeners.
Me gave Reuven yadov.
After
Reuven washed his hands, he then dried
his hands and he made the bracha of al
netilas yadaim.
So, for Reuven, think about the order of
what happened. Reuven washed his hands,
he heard someone else say hamotzi, he
then dried his hands and made the
bracha. So, in the world of Reuven,
there was a major hefsek between washing
the hands, drying them, and making the
bracha
by listening to hamotzi. Lo ya'aveh
hefsek.
It's not a hefsek. Ve yoitzei be
bracha's Yaakov.
He's yoitzei with Yaakov's bracha ve ein
tzorech lachzor ul'varech bracha's
hamotzi. He doesn't have to make hamotzi
again.
It happens to be that I have ha'ara'ah
on this mechaber.
I've been waiting for this for 6 and 1/2
years.
On this mechaber.
In parsha's Vayechi,
there's a major discussion in the
acharonim, what exactly is parsha's
Vayechi?
Is Yaakov rebuking his children? Is
Yaakov speaking nevu'ah?
The Abarbanel has his classic p'shat.
No one explicitly calls what takes place
bracha's Yaakov.
In the yeshiva ketanas, they make you
memorize the bracha's Yaakov. Although,
there's no source
to to a subject or an a partial of the
Torah called Birchas Yaakov.
Except for this Machaber in Siman Kuf
Samech Zayin, Sif Zayin. You think it's
a coincidence that the Beis Yosef set up
the case
that Reuven is washing his hands and
Yaakov is making the Bracha and he
refers to it he's Yotzei be Birchas
Yaakov.
That's the first Torah. Ha'arah number
two.
Reuven never got a Bracha. Reuven was
lambasted.
Pachaz Kamayim al Toisar Keil Lisa
Mishkevei Avicha al Chilalto Yitzui
Allah.
Yeser Seis Yeser Yeser
Yeser Oz.
Reuven, you lost everything.
You lost Malchus. You lost the Bechira.
You're impetuous. You defiled my bread.
What did Reuven get out of it? Did he
get a Bracha? So, the Machaber just
wants you to know even Reuven got
Birchas Yaakov. You know, even it's not
a coincidence that he picked Reuven
either. Okay.
But in any event,
why not? Why is this not a Hefsek? Let's
see the Mishna
Berurah. Lo Itzi Hasoymim Ve'gam
Hasoymim Kivnu Be'brachasei Ve'ach
Reuven dried his hands. Ve'hu Ve'hu
Hadin Kishakol Hanetilah u'Birchas
Hanetilas Yadayim Haya Achar Kach.
The same thing would be when all the
Netilah
and the Bracha of Netilas Yadayim was
afterwards.
The same thing would apply
when all the Netilah
and the Bracha of Netilas Yadayim was
afterwards.
Meaning, let's say he first heard from
Yaakov on the Tilsi and then Reuven
washed his hands and made the bracha.
Gam Kinyan Yada have a hefsek. Why? Why
is it not a hefsek? How could it not be
a hefsek?
How could washing your hands, drying
them, and making on the Tilsi not be a
hefsek? No, it's a tzaruch suda.
It's a tzaruch suda. You're allowed to
be mafsik in between hamotzi and eating
with tzaruch suda v'chanal. So, why did
the mechaber pick this case and not all
the others and and only pick this case?
Ela l'hureisano to show us that in
birkas natilas yadaim b'sha'ah
she'Yaakov motzi. If Reuven was making
bracha natilas yadaim at the time that
Yaakov was saying hamotzi d'lo yatza
you're not yatza sarei.
Daharei tzaruch.
L'havin, you need to understand
v'lishmaya mashma ham'varech v'lo
l'hafsek b'divrei acherim.
V'az shomei'a koheina.
So, the Mishna Berurah is saying the
reason why
you can't be saying natilas yadaim at
the time that the mashmi'a is saying is
hamotzi is because you need to
understand and listen what he's saying.
And if you're talking and you're saying
the bracha of natilas yadaim, you're not
listening. What if the guy says, "I was
listening."
I would have said to that, "It's not
possible. Trei koli lo mishtam'i." Yeah?
That's what I would have said.
Look in the Sha'ar HaTziyun mem gimmel.
U'mistabra d'afΧΧΧ im she'kivanti oz
b'libi l'varech al hamotzi, gam kein lo
yatza.
Why? Kivan d'masha yoitzei b'shmi'a hu
rak m'nei d'shomei'a koheina. The reason
you're yoitzei by listening is because
shomei'a koheina.
V'zeh shayeich davka k'she'shoseik.
Imagine if you you said like this.
You know, imagine if you braided inter
then
I don't I don't it's not possible that
you'd be yoitzei the bracha if you were
simultaneously stringing together two
different brachas.
Now, the Shulchan Aruch doesn't say my
reason.
Maybe he's he's giving a better reason.
Maybe the guy would say I could I could
listen to two things simultaneously.
There are people like that.
In the biography of Rav Menachem Ziemba
it brings that Rav Menachem Ziemba was
able to answer a shver Rambam while
people were talking to him.
While people were talking to him, he
would
answer a shver Rambam.
Okay, so even
but in this case, even if you claim you
could listen, it's still not going to be
okay.
What's the halacha by havdalah?
If
you say borei pri hagafen,
then you say borei minei besamim,
and you smell it, and by the time while
the besamim is going around,
you made a borei me'orei ha'eish in
between the time
you said borei minei besamim and the
other people smelled the besamim.
Is that a hefsek?
I would think so.
I would think it's a hefsek for them.
They heard borei minei besamim.
And before they smelled the besamim,
they said borei meorei ha'eish.
Is it a hefsek?
Do the poskim say you have to be careful
to wait until everyone smells the
besamim?
>> You can't listen and smell at the same
time. It's a little different than
hearing. You can't speak and listen.
>> No, before you smelled, you heard the
words borei meorei ha'eish. So, you're
mafsik with the the shemeia. Ke'ilu said
borei meorei ha'eish before they
smelled.
That's a hefsek.
Let's say somebody says
baruch atah Adonai Eloheinu Melech
ha'olam borei minei besamim.
And then they smell. So, the the bracha
doesn't work.
So, mali what did the Yankees do? And
mali borei meorei ha'eish has nothing to
do with with smelling the besamim.
Is that a tzorech of the besamim to make
lechaim or not?
Okay. It's only in this case
where
al netilat yadayim is not a In other
words,
you heard someone say hamotzi. I didn't
eat the bread yet, but meanwhile I'm
making al netilat yadayim. Okay, that's
not a hefsek. Al netilat yadayim is a
tzorech hasuda.
Okay.
>> case Mr. Borah says, I was saying I was
saying of Arabic.
Why is he mentioning kiddush now? I was
talking about hamotzi.
>> Where does this come from?
Yeah, I hear.
Where he Where did this come out of left
field?
>> Yeah.
>> So, right. Good point. The mission rule
concludes on the center of him. How do
we know someone was out below Shabbos
Kodesh K'shalah Balabayas Motzi B'nei
Beisai
B'Kiddush
What?
>> What?
People are washing already and making
out this is done during Kiddush.
>> I don't know.
I don't know what he means. Anyone have
a different Gersa?
Motzi B'nei Beisai B'Kiddush that the
what? The people are doing something
else? They're involved They're They're
singing the Ratzon? What's going on?
Okay.
U've on the Tilsi Dyum.
Ruben dries his hands and he says Tilsi
Dyum. We have forgotten the common lunch
in my corner.
Even though we hold Sh'may Koinu K'var
Pasak Amagaim Al B'sim Kofnin K'sif Y'ra
Avdim Koidim Sh'may Al the Tilsi Dyum.
B'racham Motzi Lo Yuchal Avarcho Al the
Tilsi Dyum.
We hold Sh'may Koinu and we already said
that if before you made Al the Tilsi
Dyum you made Hamotzi
you can't say Al the Tilsi Dyum again.
Once you make
If you made Hamotzi before the Tilsi
Dyum you can no longer and you Let's say
you washed you like this. You washed
your hands.
You said Hamotzi you can't say the Tilsi
Dyum. Once you dried it If you dried
your hands you could still say Al the
Tilsi Dyum. But once you said Hamotzi
you can't say the Tilsi Dyum. So, in In
case you washed your hands someone else
said hamotzi, it should be tantamount
like you said hamotzi, and now you
should not be able to say netilat
yadayim. No, shani hacha dol eini give
yadav.
Here, the guy didn't dry them yet, so
he's still in the he's still in the
process. Koidem b'racha hamotzi v'lo
eini g'mar mitzvah dain. Aval umekvar
eini give gam kein, if you're ready to
dry them, then taka, we would follow
what the Magen Avraham says, that if you
dried your hands and you either said
hamotzi or heard hamotzi say lo yochal
l'varech al netilat yadayim keivan
d'kvar yatza b'virchas hamotzi.
If you look in Sha'ar HaTziyon mem
daled, maybe I'm getting into trouble of
saying this over.
What if you dried your hands after
hamotzi
before you said netilat yadayim?
He says d'im hanegiva sh'lo haya acher
b'virchas hamotzi. If your drying was
after hamotzi
before you said netilat yadayim, there's
a question. Maybe this is better cuz at
the time that you said hamotzi, your
hands weren't dry.
So now the b'racha cannot prevent you
from saying netilat yadayim.
Meaning the Mishna Berurah is talking
about you didn't dry your hands
so what you could do is you could say
netilat yadayim
and then
dry your hands.
I don't understand what the Sha'ar
HaTziyon is saying.
Sha'ar HaTziyon seems to be saying that
if after you heard Hamotzi, you could
make Netilat Yadayim and then dry them,
but if you first dry them,
then maybe you can no longer make
Netilat Yadayim.
Right? That's what the Shulchan Aruch
Aruch seems to be saying.
But
I don't understand his question.
The Mechaber says openly
that the case is
after Kacha Ni gave Reuven Yadayim
and then said Netilat Yadayim. So, the
Shulchan Aruch says you could dry them
and then make Netilat Yadayim.
If anyone could explain Shulchan Aruch
Aruch Mem Daled,
Tavo Aleichem Bracha. What What exactly
is his Sefek? The Mecha- The case of the
Mechaber is
where you dry them and why is the
Shulchan Aruch Aruch unsure about this?
The Mishna In other words, the Shulchan
Aruch Aruch is explaining that which I
said, you know, the Magen Avraham said,
"Once you say Hamotzi, you can no longer
make Netilat Yadayim." Answers the
Mishna Berurah, "Here it's different cuz
you didn't dry your hands yet."
But if you dry them,
then you can make Netilat Yadayim.
>> The
The case of the of the Mechaber is where
Reuven
is not the one who's Mevarech Hamotzi.
Uh maybe there's a distinction that this
case of the Shulchan Aruch Aruch I
The same fellow
is not only
had had
the giver of the water and after that
the Motzi place the Bracha, he himself.
So, maybe that That would be in theory
lies a distinction.
Whether he's making the Hamotzi or or or
his uh
Reuven is involved
>> I think the Shulchan Aruch Aruch is
going I think the Shulchan Aruch Aruch
is going on the case of the Mishna Bora
and the mission Bora is talking about
our case where he's being you would say
how much he from from Yaakov.
Okay, let's we'll think about it.