Can A Kohein Who Converted To Another Religion & Did Teshuva Duchan? MB DH Siman 128 Seif 37-38

Correct. Okay. Good morning French. We're continuing in we're up to we're in middle of lammed Zion. Just want to begin by uh I have regards for all of you from mayor. He wishes you all and he gives you especially those who are learning brings an opinion a mumar cannot some say if he does he could there does that apply does this apply to the didn't bring down such a but say it applies eyes there as well. Um the says that is even if a person worshiped idols will help then and by the way the Rama says it works which is interesting that inif the Rama also said and he says but he didn't say that's the you know it's interesting said that there is a that if he if a murderer did chuva he could said you could be lenient and the min is to follow that here he says the ikarita is like the opinion that if you do chuva it helps Just to review one more time when it came to murder the did not bring down this which implies that he holds that by murder it's much worse because of the opinion of the butt and the who also sends regards says that it's that the isim By the way, in terms of our of why the Rama here, oh, let me just finish with the beh and I have an interesting pass by your murderer and he says that's the minhug even beed the pread and they hold that By maze you can't do chuva. So I just want to point out an interesting har to write it down in and this is a har which is not like the and the which is more mash like the namely in the rama brings down a that if you do chuv it helps and you could be and that's the midhug. However, in the Rama says more than that the is I think there's a difference in the between and in he brings down a he says that you could be and the min but he did not say the is that we're lenient by by a mumar he did say and I think that's because of of the namely that in meaning by murder the is not that we're lenient the maybe is that we're not lenient it's a to be lenient here the Rama doesn't say it's a ka to be lenient or the be lenient the says the is that we're in other words like the and in that case you know you can't assume that just because brought down aim in that that would apply in okay according to everyone if happened everyone says he could mean says even though the who's the first opinion The first opinion that Mumar loa kapav is the raam. The second opinion is rashi and raenoguine. Even though the Rambam who's the first opinion writes that if he served he can't that's he just converted but he didn't worship idols yet he acknowledged and he accepted as a god. So the Ram says even if he just converted even if he didn't worship yet even though conversion is like idolatry that if you do it intentionally was so when the says So the Mishra was bothered by a question. How could but the ra who's the first he says that the answer is here is talking that if somebody converted and under duress they would be able to if somebody um worshiped idols under duress then the rama would say you could but the rama would disagree If someone drank a ra of wine in one shot says if he drank it in two gulps what says Um we compare it to avoid and the you would be if you drank this amount. So too by if you drank raas you cannot do the avoid. Now this is very interesting because when it comes to all the surra even if you interrupt the of the raas it's still considered brings from the here it's different because it's only if you drink like the opinion of rabzar who dares that you're now to drink but once you interrupt in middle or you put a little water this is not in other words this is not going to help you when you drive if you can't say yeah I drank but I drank it in in two gulps or I put a little water of drinking in two gulps or putting a little water it's not considered Um, okay. Why does a lot of this have to do with the drinking versus what your state of mind is? Because there's no there's no about state of mind. There's no nowhere does it say that if you don't have the proper state of mind, you can't. It's not the state of mind is an issue. Can we say that? That's that's dava fora. I don't have it for other parts of there's no by that can't say it's only so if it's um so that doesn't apply to it's only no is not is something else this week's para you know you can't you can't you can't do So that's a that's not right. That's that's no that's we that's the says that's only so therefore if you interrupt by meaning for this is not going to necessarily help you. What about if you drank um it's so that is a but is not okay then it is in the mikdash you won't be it would only be to do the in the mikdash you're only if it's if it's not it's which is more lenient than it's so I wonder regarding the is it a let's say according to 4.42 42 oz or is it of 3.3 O this is a but you'd only be I would say you need it would only be if you drink the why because the whole this is that anything that in the mikdash you'd be isser by the mikdash you're so you'd only be if you drank a so you'd only be it would only be if you drank a share if you drank 3.3 o it would be to that's what maybe it would come out okay we'll hold it over here recording stopped