Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Okay, good morning everyone. We're
continuing in Mishna.
We're at the end of
we are we have to read a minimum of 10.
However, if after the creo you realize
you only read nine,
minimum of three for each. You don't go
back. Variah leav parasik
the raya is amalik.
You know if amalik would only have known
that he would be a riyah to a halaka.
You know there's a there's a gar arav
that says amalik sim. Soak emden says
amalik sim. How could malik be the sim?
You're going to use amalik to be the
simmon. You're supposed to forget
amalik. Now you're using it as a as
annemonic to remember. So then says,
"Yeah, because that's why the trap is
don't
forget." So literally it means don't
forget to erase him. But you greet it
don't
forget to erase him. Sometimes you have
to forget to race. When do you forget to
erase? If it helps you remember, if it
helps you learn. So here also
that the is only nuk
if you l less than nine you have to go
back says the
whole thing is only
since there we read n we mention the
reason is because it's
on other days
with nine
the and the
straight up argue on the
wow
that's amazing the straight up argues I
guess the
is saying his own
their opinion
10 is
if you do less you have to go back and
make
how much the says
so what do you do
even according to
even the would agree it's good to go
back and read another threeim
I don't know how the mission knows that
according to the it would be good to go
back. I would have said according to it
would not be good to go back. Since when
do we since when do you go back and read
without making a it's not so you could
just read without a I would not have
said that according to the
said
you mean that you don't have to but if
you want to it's good interesting so it
sounds like the mish is coming out
that that's what you should do in
deference to the pis you should go back
and read
But if you read if you read less than
nine
that is each one read less than each one
readim.
So how could each one have read three
but in total it was eightim? The numbers
don't add up. Yeah you have three three
and three is nine. The answer is
in other words the third Ali I went back
and read one of the that the previous
ones read you're still not why but we
read nine no it's a total of
still you're not now why is how do we
know this is the case maybe the case is
the third only red tube so can that we
already know doesn't work.
If the third only read
some say
in this case if you did three three and
three and one of the threes read one of
the of the earlier
that's the opinion of the
that you don't have to go back
and says
Don't we wouldn't pass in that way. Why?
Cuz the even holds if you read nine
straight up, you have to go back and
make a certainly if you read nine and
one of them was repeated.
The gr says we don't learn out from
Sorry.
>> What?
I had to mute everyone because there's a
I hear an echo.
>> Repeat.
>> Yeah, but it's not a problem because in
the total we're ling more than there's
nothing wrong with repeating. The
problem is you need to have a minimum
requisite total of
okay. So the the is not pleased to rely
on the
and the the
who say that if you read nine and you
repeat it you don't go back.
So it's really a total of eight because
the is even if you read a total of nine
you do go back with a brace
you have to go back and read again if
you read less than nine wrote
the one that read improperly
it's not they go back plural it's one
guy goes back.
Now, what who's the guy who read read
improperly?
Again, the case of the cases and Mr.
Shabu just pointed out in the previous
katan, nobody read improperly. It was 3
three3, but one of the threes repeated
another p. So apparently that's the one
that's improper. In other words, when
Misha, write this down. When the Misha
says,
you could ask nobody read
because the previous explained
that must be the
fine.
So
since parv is back to the
look in look is all about again even
though we talked about it in we're back
to it and the forel is the so we're
going to learn nowra
[Music]
Basically, you cut par's in half. You
rendered the paralum.
You didn't you didn't read the whole
thing.
Open it again.
Let me see. Let's see.
Let's The guy was reading par
and he started
and he's supposed to read 20
and instead he read
where did the guy app
not there. It doesn't mean there it
means the end of the
Okay. So the took it out took it uh took
it easy. So he read he read him probably
that's why he he picks that puk. So he
has to go back
So what did they do? And they did.
In other words, not only did they say
the final, they also were.
Let's see the mission of
many.
Many say that rolling it is the is did
he make the
so it's not enclosing it it's on the
that's what the spelled out earlier in
you go back to the beginning of the para
I you'll ask the question why do you
have to go back to the beginning of the
par why can't you just continue from
there's nothing wrong with the first
Korea
since you didn't read it from the
beginning the way ordained
this is not a
concur
if you skipped a
you don't go back.
We're going to read the para on the
shabas when you get up to
regarding if you skip the during the
that if you skip a p during a regular
shabas you go back but if you skip a p
by the mayadim you don't go back
however
this is all if you skip that is not one
of the fundamental obligations of the
meaning one of the earlier are not one
of the critical
or maybe he means those are the
critical. In other words, this is all if
he skipped from theim that are not
would be
right in other words the first 10 are
probably the critical
by the way that's very interesting out
of the whole par there's an
I think yeah you hear there are two ways
to read this but I think what the is
saying is
you got to go
regarding skipping the on the
if you skip the
carban if you skip one of those we for
sure have to go back
who he asks on the shim
that he's not he doesn't understand why
he just said no matter what if you skip
You don't go back. If you skip one of
the 10 critical, you would have to go
back. Okay, we'll hold it over here in
today's Mishnab
>> recording stopped. Right.
