ALL PARSHA - The Chasam Sofer on Parshas Vayeishev

welcome everyone to a special edition of this week we're going to examine the comments of the not specifically on actually on but are very much tied in and the story line and the main theme of it's reputed that the said this is quoted in the the official biography of the from The Grand as well as quote in the deals with the following famous question why is there no on khah there should be M that tells us the basic events of the story of Kaneka the basic where to light when to light how to light some reputed to have said that rebi the redactor of the mishna a descendant of did not want to have a dedicated for because inappropriately wrongfully usurped for themselves therefore as a Sion of the davidic dynasty rebi did not dedicate a because acted improperly against the family of rabi and many challenge this comment ofer because what rebbi acted at of a personal Vendetta to protect the honor of his family many challenge whether the in fact said this now in the newer edition of and this is actually how it's quoted in the it's brought not that rebi acted based on personal reasons but he did ites he was divinely directed not to compose a a however it's interesting in sh maharat written by vineberg in Sim he says that no re did not act out of a for personal reasons he did it he felt that it was inappropriate what the what the did and therefore it he didn't want it to be commemorated in a the essential argument of is based on the idea that acted wrongfully because they usurped the now what's wrong with the usurping the we know the says needs to remain in the family of sh Yehuda the Mal bed the ran learns can never be removed from the family of David and the and the sh ofuda this is a very important theme when it comes to this week's para the main theme of the par of course is and the obvious question is how could the whose names are inscribed on the how could they kidnap their brother sell their brother he was a sadik they were sikim it was their brother moreover they joined the in their not to reveal what happened why how could they bring the into this why would Hashem participate in this what is the rationale of what the did how could they do such a thing how could they bring Hashem into it and what's most perplexing is the medish tells us that when they discovered and Y revealed himself in the med says they said you're y we should have killed you the first time they wanted to kill him now how could that be after all the suffering that they endured because they sold him now they're going to kill him the advances the following remarkable approach says the when y seemed to have dreams of grandor that he would be the king they said you can't be the belongs to this and anyone who therefore they that was he's arguing not only on the M but on God himself and therefore they were able to join hasem into the and maybe later they regret and they said no maybe he really didn't want to be the M we shouldn't have jumped to that conclusion but when y revealed himself in and he said I'm the king of Egypt they said aha you want to be the M we were right in our original assumption you're being so it comes out the essential argument of the of why rebi did not want to dedicate is the very reason why the brothers sold because they held he was being it so this idea attributed to is a very important theme according to the and understanding wishing everyone a wonderful shabas and a