Rabbi Avi Neuberger speaking at Thursday Mishmar at Bais Medrash Ohr Chaim Parshas Terumah

it always comes out um yeah basically always that um the pares of is around time so it would be very good if we could combine the themes of Bor together with and there's one gar there's one gar that Mish makes a link from the Mish and the mikdash to like a direct connection and the is what the connection it says like this says had three MIT when they entered first one to establish a king the second thing was to destroy and the third thing was to to build and then supposed so says that those three Mitzvah um making a king destroying and theik the say is that means first you have to have a and then you have to destroy aik and then you have to B of M another way to formulate this would be that and here I think is a very important point and IT addresses another point and that is like this if I would ask you what's the between the and the Mish what's the B was fancier it was bigger it was more elaborate and the M was smaller and more portable that's what's what's the what's between the and the and the Mish so so this so maybe so this this tells you as long as a m is around you can't have a MD you could have a mish you can't that mean make a that has destroy a and then you can build the B that means a m can coexist with a and a cannot coexist with that's a very between the is why why is it that if a is around you could have a mish but not a mdash but once is gone you B MD what's what why is a stare the existence of a m so you could say it one of two ways one way you could say it is maybe simple more is that is that it say and when you look at the there when he inaugurates the he gives a whole speech about coming and they're GNA bringas and we're gonna accept theas andik that they took from the it was not only for even for recognize as being then if you have if you have an in the world then you can't have a because the bdash has to be something that's recognized by by by Nations and the most the the the highest the most terrible what maybe is so is in the world you can't have now so at this point you'll ask me but we never quite got rid of so how could we ever have gotten mdash the ter is that the fact is that we never really got the full-fledged B mdash had because we never fully got rid of our we got rid of amik as a nation right but as scattered people they still exist so if that we got rid of them as a nation we were able to have a mdash but the B this would have been got destroyed because it got destroyed because we didn't quite get we got we got as a nation as a identifiable Nation there's no identifiable Nation called anymore as a but as a that would be one one way of understanding what way understand it again that the Mish it talks about the relationship between CL Israel and and and who cares but we could still have a we could have a mish but we can't b b requires that's one approach now I want to say a more cabalistic approach more speculative but maybe maybe something there and that's like this um um there's there's a Rashi in Suka and Rashi in Suka is I think the only Rashi in as I know rash says like this is rash I think it is he says that there when we say we say right is comes from he says like this what what words mean so first says the same same then he says there are three you look it up there three Each of which has 72 letters if you take the first letter of the first p and the last letter of the SEC of the second p and the first letter of the third P whatever tell each 7 two letters and if you count if you take one the first one the last one and the first one you get one sh the second to the first the second to the last the pen ultimate and the and the second to the first you get the second sameem and you go you do like that 72 times and you get 72 sham of each one of three letters rashi rashi said that the first of these the first of these 72 is and the 37th is an So when you say an you're saying that's what said yeah okay now T over there says well there's 72 other Sheamus of like why are we saying um why are we taking these two Sheamus like what does it mean soash says says no these are the two Sheamus of because you said there's a that says and go and another that says and that's in reference to and that he was tied up in chain that when goes into is tied up in chain he comes with us into I go with you into so the is so that's so when we're saying what we're saying isem should save himself that means that should take his out of because he went into and and when we go he'll come out also if you look in the in the that used to be very common you can't find it anymore right said that he said that wrong and should say the middle thep because anyways so okay that's that's if you look at the when we it's quite clear it says right I will take you out and the I will go out with you because that's the whole me should bring out of so now here's my speculation my speculation is that why okay spec why are these the shamers of why are these the Sham like why why are these the Sham here's my here's my thought and talks about like when you take the whole idea of of of it means that the when into into so you know there's a there's a that we say before we do right to unify now if if you translate the words it sounds like you're saying me to uny the together with the that means it sounds like a duality sounds like two things and we're making and I'm not the first one to say this this is says that he making a a criticism of he because you can be in the tears because you don't know what you're saying you're saying there two there The Duality you know what you're saying he says he says of course it means it means something but you don't know what you're saying you be tear and he says have have before you do before you do good what does it mean I mean it comes from is not saying that it's not true just say if you know what you're saying you have to be careful about so what's says like this he says that by the way that um that very busy with that then when we talk about when we talk about simp that constricts himself and so forth it only means on our perception of theel not in devel onto itself that means really the whole world is who says want and and so it's all his his Essence fills the whole world so why don't we see him we look around we just see the return the ter is that if we would have such vision and we would see and we have no nothing right do us a favor and he he made a that can't see it but the simptom is only Clap by our perspective that's that's what talks about it's not it's only CL the way we see the world we don't we don't see the world the way it really is it's really one big we don't see it that way we see it it's a distortion it's a distortion of right but it's all one say says he says like this is the G of what the world really is the world really is all everything everything is him everything is him but but is how much it rests by us in our Consciousness that's a lot less right it's that's it's how we don't see that degree when you're doing a mitah you're doing that means that the perception should catch up to the reality to that how much he's Shen by us should be consistent with how much it really is which is the real way it is it should be consistent with the with the with the reality and is going to be like that is going to be and that's that's like the ultimate the ultimate is when you realize everything is is part of the everything and that's why eventually there'll be such a that you can't choose all the way around it's all it's all you know there's no there's no other choice um so so it's like this so I think maybe uh I'm not dasing that long I'm not finishing until every single piece of me to sent yeah um yeah so so uh it's like this so the maybe this is a total uh speculation but maybe the W the wood an means M it points to a duality there's a me and there a him there is a separation between but listen to this and says that is a construction of Weird Says it should be work means it's refering to how much it's related how much it by us because that the get is how much we perceive him how much we reflect him that's why we go into G so the that's R by us goes into also good and when you say when you have could point and say this is the biggest ever so then merge that say says we should realize that no two things there's only one thing in any case so it's like this but we know that going back to am so again what we're trying to explain is that one why is it that when aik in the you could have a but you you can't you have a mish but you can't have a m right so maybe say like this we know that the effect of am was that he made it's not me that means the then somehow and the idea is this Rashi says that right after the whole was from the existence it was like totally known and there was this hot bubbling bath of and what does do am is the people that say the heck with it and they jump into it right they jump to the bath and they cool off the bath what they cool off the bath says what it means is they cooling off that tremendous mean they made that the perception of the that was so overwhelming until our mother comes around they said the heck with it they called it off they called it off so they made a the you could have a mish and not a mdash because things pretty pretty clear me that the word Mish is associated to word and the word m is associated to word right it sounds like it in the world so then there's going to be aod so you have you have different levels of but you can't in the then you can't M we need a complete eradication of the for us to have to get rid of I think to the main I say I want to say I think you all will relate to I had a hard time always when when eradicate the whole people like a whole Nations kids come on ladies come on how could it be nobody has that Kasha after Gaza nobody now you see guys the heck with them the whole the every single person from the whole culture is sick and you see the we have to we have to get the guys to get there but the only way you can have a eradication a real from B the anyways